Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Mark Rober claims FSD doesn’t engage without a destination — this is false Mark Rober claims Autopilot and FSD are the same thing — this is false Can Tesla please sue this guy already?
180,156 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
10 Comments

He's the dumbest, most incompetent former NASA engineer ever. Just straight up lying at this point to cover his retarded ass.

Can't believe this motherfucker is an ex-NASA engineer. Even I know there's no fucking sensor for autopilot and FSD! It's called the Tesla Vision AI system(camera only), you dumb fuck! @MarkRober @TeslaBoomerMama @thejefflutz

Do you trust Mark Zuckerberg claims that Meta will now protect free speech?

1. You don't need a destination to engage FSD. 2. FSD and Autopilot run on completely different systems.

100%. I use FSD with no destination frequently because the planner doesn’t have local knowledge, so it chooses routes I know are sub-optimal. No problem with no set destination. On trips the planner works just fine.

He’s lying

@MarkRober you've really screwed up on this one. People have overlooked your associations with people like Jimmy Kimmel, because of who you were. But this has taken things too far. You've sold yourself like a cheap whore

The real question is: would Tesla with full FSD engaged have passed this test? Is seems many people critical of mark rober have no interest in actually finding this out 🤔

@MarkRober you are really stupid if you think we are this stupid. You messed with the wrong community.

It's somewhat sad to see him transition from a science expert to a clown.
