Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Meet BFM-Zero: A Promptable Humanoid Behavioral Foundation Model w/ Unsupervised RL👉 🧩ONE latent space for ALL tasks ⚡Zero-shot goal reaching, tracking, and reward optimization (any reward at test time), from ONE policy 🤖Natural recovery & transition

Yitang Li

1,124 subscribers

81,763 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

NVIDIA researchers present SONIC, a generalist humanoid controller: It scales motion tracking on a single policy to achieve natural, robust whole-body movement. The scalable foundation avoids manual reward engineering and features a universal token space and kinematic planner to seamlessly integrate diverse inputs, including VR/video teleoperation and VLA foundation models, for real-world tasks.

NVIDIA researchers present SONIC, a generalist humanoid controller: It scales motion tracking on a single policy to achieve natural, robust whole-body movement. The scalable foundation avoids manual reward engineering and features a universal token space and kinematic planner to seamlessly integrate diverse inputs, including VR/video teleoperation and VLA foundation models, for real-world tasks.

The Humanoid Hub

31,445 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The Segment Anything Model (SAM) by Meta AI is a step toward the first foundation model for image segmentation. SAM is capable of one-click segmentation of any object from photos or videos + zero-shot transfer to other segmentation tasks. Try the demo ➡️

The Segment Anything Model (SAM) by Meta AI is a step toward the first foundation model for image segmentation. SAM is capable of one-click segmentation of any object from photos or videos + zero-shot transfer to other segmentation tasks. Try the demo ➡️

AI at Meta

186,348 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Evo: a foundation model for genomics! Using a well suited architecture, Evo learns from billions of bp of genomic sequence and performs well on several zero-shot prediction tasks on RNA, DNA and protein. Beautiful paper from Brian Hie & Patrick Hsu at Arc Institute

Evo: a foundation model for genomics! Using a well suited architecture, Evo learns from billions of bp of genomic sequence and performs well on several zero-shot prediction tasks on RNA, DNA and protein. Beautiful paper from Brian Hie & Patrick Hsu at Arc Institute

Julia Bauman

52,367 просмотров • 2 лет назад

How can we build a general-purpose “foundation model” for robot motion? Zhengyi “Zen” Luo joins us to talk about SONIC, which uses motion tracking as a foundational task for humanoid robot control, and scales humanoid control training to 9k GPU hours and 100 million frames worth of data. The result: a model with a generally-useful embedding space that can be controlled by a VLA, or from human video, to perform a wide variety of humanoid whole-body-control tasks, including with zero-shot transfer to previously unseen motions. Watch episode 72 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Jiafei Duan, now!

How can we build a general-purpose “foundation model” for robot motion? Zhengyi “Zen” Luo joins us to talk about SONIC, which uses motion tracking as a foundational task for humanoid robot control, and scales humanoid control training to 9k GPU hours and 100 million frames worth of data. The result: a model with a generally-useful embedding space that can be controlled by a VLA, or from human video, to perform a wide variety of humanoid whole-body-control tasks, including with zero-shot transfer to previously unseen motions. Watch episode 72 of RoboPapers, with Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc and Jiafei Duan, now!

RoboPapers

24,802 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

How do you know your robot actually succeeded? In v0.6.0, you ask a VLM 🤖 LeRobot ships a new unified reward models API with two zero-shot additions. Robometer is a general-purpose reward model trained on 1M+ trajectories across 21 robot embodiments: point it at any LeRobot dataset and it scores task progress and success straight from video and a language instruction, no task-specific training needed. TOPReward goes even further: no reward weights at all. It wraps an off-the-shelf VLM and reads the log-probability of the token "True" given the video and the instruction. Both come with labeling scripts that write per-frame progress curves into your dataset, ready for reward-aware behavior cloning. More on how they work:

How do you know your robot actually succeeded? In v0.6.0, you ask a VLM 🤖 LeRobot ships a new unified reward models API with two zero-shot additions. Robometer is a general-purpose reward model trained on 1M+ trajectories across 21 robot embodiments: point it at any LeRobot dataset and it scores task progress and success straight from video and a language instruction, no task-specific training needed. TOPReward goes even further: no reward weights at all. It wraps an off-the-shelf VLM and reads the log-probability of the token "True" given the video and the instruction. Both come with labeling scripts that write per-frame progress curves into your dataset, ready for reward-aware behavior cloning. More on how they work:

LeRobot

22,072 просмотров • 14 дней назад

🤖Adding new RL algorithms to LeRobot just got much easier. Demo: HIL-SERL training with a SAC-based RL algorithm on an SO-100 for a hole-in-hand peg-in-hole task. Sparse reward, only 30 offline demos mixed with live robot experience, and ~1 hour of online training with human interventions only when the policy fails. The bottom graph tracks intervention rate: high at the start, steadily dropping as the policy improves. The refactor separates algorithm logic from training infrastructure: • RLAlgorithm owns learning logic • RLTrainer handles orchestration • DataMixer combines rollouts, demos, interventions, and future data sources Adding an RL algorithm now looks much closer to adding a policy: one algorithm file, one config, one registry entry. SAC is first. RLT, RECAP, ConRFT, QC-FQL, DSRL, and VLA RL fine-tuning next! Thomas Wolf clem 🤗

🤖Adding new RL algorithms to LeRobot just got much easier. Demo: HIL-SERL training with a SAC-based RL algorithm on an SO-100 for a hole-in-hand peg-in-hole task. Sparse reward, only 30 offline demos mixed with live robot experience, and ~1 hour of online training with human interventions only when the policy fails. The bottom graph tracks intervention rate: high at the start, steadily dropping as the policy improves. The refactor separates algorithm logic from training infrastructure: • RLAlgorithm owns learning logic • RLTrainer handles orchestration • DataMixer combines rollouts, demos, interventions, and future data sources Adding an RL algorithm now looks much closer to adding a policy: one algorithm file, one config, one registry entry. SAC is first. RLT, RECAP, ConRFT, QC-FQL, DSRL, and VLA RL fine-tuning next! Thomas Wolf clem 🤗

LeRobot

30,484 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

OpenClaw meets RL! OpenClaw Agents adapt through memory files and skills, but the base model weights never actually change. OpenClaw-RL solves this! It wraps a self-hosted model as an OpenAI-compatible API, intercepts live conversations from OpenClaw, and trains the policy in the background using RL. The architecture is fully async. This means serving, reward scoring, and training all run in parallel. Once done, weights get hot-swapped after every batch while the agent keeps responding. Currently, it has two training modes: - Binary RL (GRPO): A process reward model scores each turn as good, bad, or neutral. That scalar reward drives policy updates via a PPO-style clipped objective. - On-Policy Distillation: When concrete corrections come in like "you should have checked that file first," it uses that feedback as a richer, directional training signal at the token level. When to use OpenClaw-RL? To be fair, a lot of agent behavior can already be improved through better memory and skill design. OpenClaw's existing skill ecosystem and community-built self-improvement skills handle a wide range of use cases without touching model weights at all. If the agent keeps forgetting preferences, that's a memory problem. And if it doesn't know how to handle a specific workflow, that's a skill problem. Both are solvable at the prompt and context layer. Where RL becomes interesting is when the failure pattern lives deeper in the model's reasoning itself. Things like consistently poor tool selection order, weak multi-step planning, or failing to interpret ambiguous instructions the way a specific user intends. Research on agentic RL (like ARTIST and Agent-R1) has shown that these behavioral patterns hit a ceiling with prompt-based approaches alone, especially in complex multi-turn tasks where the model needs to recover from tool failures or adapt its strategy mid-execution. That's the layer OpenClaw-RL targets, and it's a meaningful distinction from what OpenClaw offers. I have shared the repo in the replies!

OpenClaw meets RL! OpenClaw Agents adapt through memory files and skills, but the base model weights never actually change. OpenClaw-RL solves this! It wraps a self-hosted model as an OpenAI-compatible API, intercepts live conversations from OpenClaw, and trains the policy in the background using RL. The architecture is fully async. This means serving, reward scoring, and training all run in parallel. Once done, weights get hot-swapped after every batch while the agent keeps responding. Currently, it has two training modes: - Binary RL (GRPO): A process reward model scores each turn as good, bad, or neutral. That scalar reward drives policy updates via a PPO-style clipped objective. - On-Policy Distillation: When concrete corrections come in like "you should have checked that file first," it uses that feedback as a richer, directional training signal at the token level. When to use OpenClaw-RL? To be fair, a lot of agent behavior can already be improved through better memory and skill design. OpenClaw's existing skill ecosystem and community-built self-improvement skills handle a wide range of use cases without touching model weights at all. If the agent keeps forgetting preferences, that's a memory problem. And if it doesn't know how to handle a specific workflow, that's a skill problem. Both are solvable at the prompt and context layer. Where RL becomes interesting is when the failure pattern lives deeper in the model's reasoning itself. Things like consistently poor tool selection order, weak multi-step planning, or failing to interpret ambiguous instructions the way a specific user intends. Research on agentic RL (like ARTIST and Agent-R1) has shown that these behavioral patterns hit a ceiling with prompt-based approaches alone, especially in complex multi-turn tasks where the model needs to recover from tool failures or adapt its strategy mid-execution. That's the layer OpenClaw-RL targets, and it's a meaningful distinction from what OpenClaw offers. I have shared the repo in the replies!

Avi Chawla

138,691 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

For the first time in human history, we are teaching a Foundation Model to master the diverse tasks of medicinal chemists, biologists, and computational scientists all in one place. In our latest collaboration with Liquid AI, we are moving away from fragmented, specialized tools toward a single, super-intelligent model. What surprised me most? This model isn't just performing at reasonable levels—it has started outperforming specialist models across physics-based tasks, imaging, and longitudinal data. Why this changes everything: -Synergy over Specialization: Fine-tuning on specific tasks has unlocked unexpected capabilities in synergetic areas, opening a new frontier in multimodal AI research. -Zero-Shot Potential: We are building a model that can perform out-of-scope tasks, moving us closer to an "AI deity" for drug discovery. -Quality First: The goal isn't just to bypass regulations to save time; it’s about using these synergies to develop better, more effective drugs. We are no longer just looking at linear regression or simple text; we are looking at the future of how humanity fights disease. #LiquidAI #InsilicoMedicine #GenerativeAI #DrugDiscovery #DeepTech #BiotechInnovation

For the first time in human history, we are teaching a Foundation Model to master the diverse tasks of medicinal chemists, biologists, and computational scientists all in one place. In our latest collaboration with Liquid AI, we are moving away from fragmented, specialized tools toward a single, super-intelligent model. What surprised me most? This model isn't just performing at reasonable levels—it has started outperforming specialist models across physics-based tasks, imaging, and longitudinal data. Why this changes everything: -Synergy over Specialization: Fine-tuning on specific tasks has unlocked unexpected capabilities in synergetic areas, opening a new frontier in multimodal AI research. -Zero-Shot Potential: We are building a model that can perform out-of-scope tasks, moving us closer to an "AI deity" for drug discovery. -Quality First: The goal isn't just to bypass regulations to save time; it’s about using these synergies to develop better, more effective drugs. We are no longer just looking at linear regression or simple text; we are looking at the future of how humanity fights disease. #LiquidAI #InsilicoMedicine #GenerativeAI #DrugDiscovery #DeepTech #BiotechInnovation

Alex Zhavoronkov, PhD (aka Aleksandrs Zavoronkovs)

10,544 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Why do most humanoid motion trackers still slip, skate, or clip through objects? Because the real bottleneck isn’t RL, it’s bad retargeting… OmniRetarget flips the script: instead of compensating with dozens of reward terms, it generates high-quality, interaction-preserving trajectories from human motions. The result is agile, human-like skills with minimal RL. ✅ 5 reward terms, 4 domain randomization terms, proprioception only, no history or curriculum ✅ Interaction mesh produces clean, contact-preserving motions with virtually no foot-skating ✅ Works across embodiments (Unitree H1, Booster T1) and scales from one demo to many scenes From carrying boxes to slope crawling to parkour-style rolls, policies trained on OmniRetarget data transfer zero-shot from sim to real hardware. Thanks for sharing, Zhen Wu! 📍Paper: Website: Dataset:

Why do most humanoid motion trackers still slip, skate, or clip through objects? Because the real bottleneck isn’t RL, it’s bad retargeting… OmniRetarget flips the script: instead of compensating with dozens of reward terms, it generates high-quality, interaction-preserving trajectories from human motions. The result is agile, human-like skills with minimal RL. ✅ 5 reward terms, 4 domain randomization terms, proprioception only, no history or curriculum ✅ Interaction mesh produces clean, contact-preserving motions with virtually no foot-skating ✅ Works across embodiments (Unitree H1, Booster T1) and scales from one demo to many scenes From carrying boxes to slope crawling to parkour-style rolls, policies trained on OmniRetarget data transfer zero-shot from sim to real hardware. Thanks for sharing, Zhen Wu! 📍Paper: Website: Dataset:

Ilir Aliu - eu/acc

61,491 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Karpathy's prediction about RL is coming true now! He called reward functions unreliable and argued that a single reward number is too low-dimensional to teach an agent what "good" means for complex tasks. To solve this, Agents need a knowledge-guided review as a higher-dimensional feedback channel. Every major AI lab trains models with RL today (OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek). And their key bottleneck has always been the reward functions. GRPO by DeepSeek worked well for math and code because the environment gave a binary signal. But for real agent tasks, someone still has to hand-code the scoring function. That takes days and breaks every time the pipeline changes. RULER (implemented in OpenPipe ART, 10k stars) addresses the exact problem Karpathy identified. The reward criteria are defined in plain English, and an LLM evaluates each trajectory against that description to provide feedback for training. I trained a Qwen3 1.4B agent that plays 2048 using GRPO with this exact workflow. In this case, the agent saw the board, picked a direction, and RULER evaluated the outcome, all from this natural language definition. You can see the full implementation on GitHub and try it yourself. Here's the ART Repo: (don't forget to star it ⭐ ) Just like RLHF replaced manual rankings and GRPO replaced the critic model, natural language rewards are replacing hand-coded scoring functions. RL reward engineering is now prompt engineering. I wrote a full walkthrough covering RL for LLM agents, from RLHF to GRPO to RULER, in the article below.

Karpathy's prediction about RL is coming true now! He called reward functions unreliable and argued that a single reward number is too low-dimensional to teach an agent what "good" means for complex tasks. To solve this, Agents need a knowledge-guided review as a higher-dimensional feedback channel. Every major AI lab trains models with RL today (OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek). And their key bottleneck has always been the reward functions. GRPO by DeepSeek worked well for math and code because the environment gave a binary signal. But for real agent tasks, someone still has to hand-code the scoring function. That takes days and breaks every time the pipeline changes. RULER (implemented in OpenPipe ART, 10k stars) addresses the exact problem Karpathy identified. The reward criteria are defined in plain English, and an LLM evaluates each trajectory against that description to provide feedback for training. I trained a Qwen3 1.4B agent that plays 2048 using GRPO with this exact workflow. In this case, the agent saw the board, picked a direction, and RULER evaluated the outcome, all from this natural language definition. You can see the full implementation on GitHub and try it yourself. Here's the ART Repo: (don't forget to star it ⭐ ) Just like RLHF replaced manual rankings and GRPO replaced the critic model, natural language rewards are replacing hand-coded scoring functions. RL reward engineering is now prompt engineering. I wrote a full walkthrough covering RL for LLM agents, from RLHF to GRPO to RULER, in the article below.

Avi Chawla

350,036 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

If you want to understand why RL struggles with long-horizon agent tasks, this is a good explanation. The core issue is that sparse rewards throw away most of the useful information in the trajectory. GEPA tries to learn from the trajectory itself, using reflection in text space, instead of only optimizing on the final reward. GEPA generates textual critiques of trajectories, proposes prompt edits, and then selects updates along a Pareto frontier between exploration and exploitation instead. Instead of collapsing everything into one reward number, it keeps more information about why a run failed and uses that to make legible changes. It’ll be interesting to see where this goes when people combine that kind of trajectory-level reflection with RL, using RL for optimization while preserving a much richer signal about why the agent succeeded or failed.

If you want to understand why RL struggles with long-horizon agent tasks, this is a good explanation. The core issue is that sparse rewards throw away most of the useful information in the trajectory. GEPA tries to learn from the trajectory itself, using reflection in text space, instead of only optimizing on the final reward. GEPA generates textual critiques of trajectories, proposes prompt edits, and then selects updates along a Pareto frontier between exploration and exploitation instead. Instead of collapsing everything into one reward number, it keeps more information about why a run failed and uses that to make legible changes. It’ll be interesting to see where this goes when people combine that kind of trajectory-level reflection with RL, using RL for optimization while preserving a much richer signal about why the agent succeeded or failed.

Ben Cohen

19,990 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Meet VLA-JEPA, the first world model policy in LeRobot 🌍 Most VLAs just learn observation → action. VLA-JEPA also learns action-relevant dynamics: during training, a JEPA world model has to predict upcoming frames in latent space from the model's own actions. Then, at inference, the world model disappears entirely, leaving a standard, fast VLA: Qwen backbone, action head, nothing extra. In our demo it was fine-tuned on just 13 examples and ran in real time on an NVIDIA DGX Spark. On a consumer RTX 3080, it hits 10Hz using under 6GB of VRAM. World-model supervision during training, zero extra cost at inference. That's the whole trick.

Meet VLA-JEPA, the first world model policy in LeRobot 🌍 Most VLAs just learn observation → action. VLA-JEPA also learns action-relevant dynamics: during training, a JEPA world model has to predict upcoming frames in latent space from the model's own actions. Then, at inference, the world model disappears entirely, leaving a standard, fast VLA: Qwen backbone, action head, nothing extra. In our demo it was fine-tuned on just 13 examples and ran in real time on an NVIDIA DGX Spark. On a consumer RTX 3080, it hits 10Hz using under 6GB of VRAM. World-model supervision during training, zero extra cost at inference. That's the whole trick.

LeRobot

42,109 просмотров • 19 дней назад

New Course: Post-training of LLMs Learn to post-train and customize an LLM in this short course, taught by Banghua Zhu, Assistant Professor at the University of Washington University of Washington, and co-founder of @NexusflowX. Training an LLM to follow instructions or answer questions has two key stages: pre-training and post-training. In pre-training, it learns to predict the next word or token from large amounts of unlabeled text. In post-training, it learns useful behaviors such as following instructions, tool use, and reasoning. Post-training transforms a general-purpose token predictor—trained on trillions of unlabeled text tokens—into an assistant that follows instructions and performs specific tasks. Because it is much cheaper than pre-training, it is practical for many more teams to incorporate post-training methods into their workflows than pre-training. In this course, you’ll learn three common post-training methods—Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and Online Reinforcement Learning (RL)—and how to use each one effectively. With SFT, you train the model on pairs of input and ideal output responses. With DPO, you provide both a preferred (chosen) and a less preferred (rejected) response and train the model to favor the preferred output. With RL, the model generates an output, receives a reward score based on human or automated feedback, and updates the model to improve performance. You’ll learn the basic concepts, common use cases, and principles for curating high-quality data for effective training. Through hands-on labs, you’ll download a pre-trained model from Hugging Face and post-train it using SFT, DPO, and RL to see how each technique shapes model behavior. In detail, you’ll: - Understand what post-training is, when to use it, and how it differs from pre-training. - Build an SFT pipeline to turn a base model into an instruct model. - Explore how DPO reshapes behavior by minimizing contrastive loss—penalizing poor responses and reinforcing preferred ones. - Implement a DPO pipeline to change the identity of a chat assistant. - Learn online RL methods such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), and how to design reward functions. - Train a model with GRPO to improve its math capabilities using a verifiable reward. Post-training is one of the most rapidly developing areas of LLM training. Whether you’re building a high-accuracy context-specific assistant, fine-tuning a model's tone, or improving task-specific accuracy, this course will give you experience with the most important techniques shaping how LLMs are post-trained today. Please sign up here:

New Course: Post-training of LLMs Learn to post-train and customize an LLM in this short course, taught by Banghua Zhu, Assistant Professor at the University of Washington University of Washington, and co-founder of @NexusflowX. Training an LLM to follow instructions or answer questions has two key stages: pre-training and post-training. In pre-training, it learns to predict the next word or token from large amounts of unlabeled text. In post-training, it learns useful behaviors such as following instructions, tool use, and reasoning. Post-training transforms a general-purpose token predictor—trained on trillions of unlabeled text tokens—into an assistant that follows instructions and performs specific tasks. Because it is much cheaper than pre-training, it is practical for many more teams to incorporate post-training methods into their workflows than pre-training. In this course, you’ll learn three common post-training methods—Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and Online Reinforcement Learning (RL)—and how to use each one effectively. With SFT, you train the model on pairs of input and ideal output responses. With DPO, you provide both a preferred (chosen) and a less preferred (rejected) response and train the model to favor the preferred output. With RL, the model generates an output, receives a reward score based on human or automated feedback, and updates the model to improve performance. You’ll learn the basic concepts, common use cases, and principles for curating high-quality data for effective training. Through hands-on labs, you’ll download a pre-trained model from Hugging Face and post-train it using SFT, DPO, and RL to see how each technique shapes model behavior. In detail, you’ll: - Understand what post-training is, when to use it, and how it differs from pre-training. - Build an SFT pipeline to turn a base model into an instruct model. - Explore how DPO reshapes behavior by minimizing contrastive loss—penalizing poor responses and reinforcing preferred ones. - Implement a DPO pipeline to change the identity of a chat assistant. - Learn online RL methods such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), and how to design reward functions. - Train a model with GRPO to improve its math capabilities using a verifiable reward. Post-training is one of the most rapidly developing areas of LLM training. Whether you’re building a high-accuracy context-specific assistant, fine-tuning a model's tone, or improving task-specific accuracy, this course will give you experience with the most important techniques shaping how LLMs are post-trained today. Please sign up here:

Andrew Ng

125,146 просмотров • 1 год назад

From Zero to One: The NodeOps Story In just two years, NodeOps has grown from a 3-person team into: → A protocol generating $4.4M+ in revenue → One of the leading DePIN projects → A community of 700K+ verified users → A network powering 23K+ deployments, 5K+ machines, and 1K+ providers Our mission is simple: make infrastructure invisible and empower builders to focus on what matters, their ideas. That’s why we built Autogen, a one-stop platform for deployment, scaling, and coordination. Autogen makes it seamless to go from idea to production with AI-powered deployment and zero downtime. NodeOps isn’t just infrastructure, it’s the foundation for the next wave of AI, data, and decentralized applications. At the core of it all is $NODE, with a dynamic burn/mint model directly tied to real network revenue. Watch Sheena break it all down 👇🏻

From Zero to One: The NodeOps Story In just two years, NodeOps has grown from a 3-person team into: → A protocol generating $4.4M+ in revenue → One of the leading DePIN projects → A community of 700K+ verified users → A network powering 23K+ deployments, 5K+ machines, and 1K+ providers Our mission is simple: make infrastructure invisible and empower builders to focus on what matters, their ideas. That’s why we built Autogen, a one-stop platform for deployment, scaling, and coordination. Autogen makes it seamless to go from idea to production with AI-powered deployment and zero downtime. NodeOps isn’t just infrastructure, it’s the foundation for the next wave of AI, data, and decentralized applications. At the core of it all is $NODE, with a dynamic burn/mint model directly tied to real network revenue. Watch Sheena break it all down 👇🏻

NodeOps

22,802 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Tracking Everything Everywhere All at Once paper page: present a new test-time optimization method for estimating dense and long-range motion from a video sequence. Prior optical flow or particle video tracking algorithms typically operate within limited temporal windows, struggling to track through occlusions and maintain global consistency of estimated motion trajectories. We propose a complete and globally consistent motion representation, dubbed OmniMotion, that allows for accurate, full-length motion estimation of every pixel in a video. OmniMotion represents a video using a quasi-3D canonical volume and performs pixel-wise tracking via bijections between local and canonical space. This representation allows us to ensure global consistency, track through occlusions, and model any combination of camera and object motion. Extensive evaluations on the TAP-Vid benchmark and real-world footage show that our approach outperforms prior state-of-the-art methods by a large margin both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Tracking Everything Everywhere All at Once paper page: present a new test-time optimization method for estimating dense and long-range motion from a video sequence. Prior optical flow or particle video tracking algorithms typically operate within limited temporal windows, struggling to track through occlusions and maintain global consistency of estimated motion trajectories. We propose a complete and globally consistent motion representation, dubbed OmniMotion, that allows for accurate, full-length motion estimation of every pixel in a video. OmniMotion represents a video using a quasi-3D canonical volume and performs pixel-wise tracking via bijections between local and canonical space. This representation allows us to ensure global consistency, track through occlusions, and model any combination of camera and object motion. Extensive evaluations on the TAP-Vid benchmark and real-world footage show that our approach outperforms prior state-of-the-art methods by a large margin both quantitatively and qualitatively.

AK

280,547 просмотров • 3 лет назад

Founders spending $30K/year on agencies in 2026 haven't found naïve yet. One prompt does everything they're charging you for. I opened Naive, typed one sentence, and a full team of AI employees spun up and started building my online brand, immediately. No agency pitch deck. No onboarding call. No monthly retainer. Here's my team right now: → Marketer: running content & outreach on autopilot, zero posts from me → Engineer: building the store, shipping updates, zero reviews from me → Finance: tracking every dollar, reconciling accounts, generating reports 24/7 Each agent has their own email, bank account, phone number, and workspace. They share context, delegate tasks, and coordinate as a real team. Every outcome feeds a self-improvement loop, they get smarter with every task and every sale. I set a budget. I set one goal: first sale within 7 days. Then I walked away. What one prompt replaced: ❌ $10K developer → Engineer agent ✔️ ❌ $8K marketing agency → Marketer agent ✔️ ❌ $5K finance consultant → Finance agent ✔️ What founders on this platform are seeing right now: • Real ARR generated with zero human employees • Active businesses growing 32% week over week • Tasks completed growing 42% week over week You're still paying agencies for work one prompt handles completely. Try it free at 👉 Your first AI team is one sentence away. #NaïveAI2B9YHR

Gina Acosta

23,648 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Check out our #ICRA2024 paper "Actor-Critic Model Predictive Control." Model-free #reinforcementlearning (RL) is known for its strong task performance and flexibility in optimizing general reward formulations. On the other hand, #ModelPredictiveControl (MPC) benefits from robustness and online replanning capabilities. We combine both approaches by introducing a new framework called Actor-Critic Model Predictive Control. The key idea is to embed a differentiable MPC within an Actor-Critic RL framework. The proposed approach leverages the short-term predictive optimization capabilities of MPC with the exploratory and end-to-end training properties of RL. The resulting policy effectively manages both short-term decisions through the MPC-based actor and long-term prediction via the critic network, unifying the benefits of both model-based control and end-to-end learning. We validate our method in simulation and the real world with a quadcopter across various high-level tasks. We show that the proposed architecture can achieve real-time control performance, learn complex behaviors via trial and error, and retain the predictive properties of the MPC to better handle out-of-distribution behavior. Paper: Full Video with more details: Kudos to Ángel Romero, Yunlong Song IEEE ICRA University of Zurich UZH Science UZH Space Hub Aerial Core AUTOASSESS European Research Council (ERC)

Check out our #ICRA2024 paper "Actor-Critic Model Predictive Control." Model-free #reinforcementlearning (RL) is known for its strong task performance and flexibility in optimizing general reward formulations. On the other hand, #ModelPredictiveControl (MPC) benefits from robustness and online replanning capabilities. We combine both approaches by introducing a new framework called Actor-Critic Model Predictive Control. The key idea is to embed a differentiable MPC within an Actor-Critic RL framework. The proposed approach leverages the short-term predictive optimization capabilities of MPC with the exploratory and end-to-end training properties of RL. The resulting policy effectively manages both short-term decisions through the MPC-based actor and long-term prediction via the critic network, unifying the benefits of both model-based control and end-to-end learning. We validate our method in simulation and the real world with a quadcopter across various high-level tasks. We show that the proposed architecture can achieve real-time control performance, learn complex behaviors via trial and error, and retain the predictive properties of the MPC to better handle out-of-distribution behavior. Paper: Full Video with more details: Kudos to Ángel Romero, Yunlong Song IEEE ICRA University of Zurich UZH Science UZH Space Hub Aerial Core AUTOASSESS European Research Council (ERC)

Davide Scaramuzza

34,889 просмотров • 2 лет назад

NEW: Higgs Audio V2 from BosonAI open, unified TTS model w/ voice cloning, beats GPT 4o mini tts and ElevenLabs v2 🔥 > Trained on 10M hours (speech, music, events) > Built on top of Llama 3.2 3B > Works real-time and on edge > Beats GPT-4o-mini-tts, ElevenLabs v2 in prosody & emotion Multi-speaker dialog > Zero-shot voice cloning 🤩 > Available on Hugging Face Kudos to folks at Boson AI for releasing such a brilliant work and all the details around the model! 🤗

NEW: Higgs Audio V2 from BosonAI open, unified TTS model w/ voice cloning, beats GPT 4o mini tts and ElevenLabs v2 🔥 > Trained on 10M hours (speech, music, events) > Built on top of Llama 3.2 3B > Works real-time and on edge > Beats GPT-4o-mini-tts, ElevenLabs v2 in prosody & emotion Multi-speaker dialog > Zero-shot voice cloning 🤩 > Available on Hugging Face Kudos to folks at Boson AI for releasing such a brilliant work and all the details around the model! 🤗

Vaibhav (VB) Srivastav

79,585 просмотров • 1 год назад

THIS GUY BUILT A COMMAND CENTER FOR MANAGING AI AGENT TEAMS he was running 20+ agents through openclaw. all from terminal tabs and Discord. 12 tabs open. still losing track of who's doing what. which cron failed. so he built a dashboard that gives you one place to see everything: > org map showing the full agent hierarchy, who reports to who and what tools each agent has > chat with any agent through a real UI instead of bouncing between terminals > kanban board for tracking tasks across all agents > cron monitor with pipeline visualizations so you can see which jobs are failing > memory browser to read through all agent knowledge files in one place you can even point it at your openclaw workspace and it auto-discovers every agent from their config files. zero setup. AND ITS OPEN SOURCE TOO.

THIS GUY BUILT A COMMAND CENTER FOR MANAGING AI AGENT TEAMS he was running 20+ agents through openclaw. all from terminal tabs and Discord. 12 tabs open. still losing track of who's doing what. which cron failed. so he built a dashboard that gives you one place to see everything: > org map showing the full agent hierarchy, who reports to who and what tools each agent has > chat with any agent through a real UI instead of bouncing between terminals > kanban board for tracking tasks across all agents > cron monitor with pipeline visualizations so you can see which jobs are failing > memory browser to read through all agent knowledge files in one place you can even point it at your openclaw workspace and it auto-discovers every agent from their config files. zero setup. AND ITS OPEN SOURCE TOO.

Om Patel

46,780 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

5 Steps w/o a dribble or a shot Mfs be talkin about Caitlin's skills and what not but this chick be traveling all over the court. How many times does she travel a game to step back and create space. And this one here is INSANE. 5 steps before a pass, so you can't claim she was gathering for a shot or that dumbass zero step cop out. I betchu even Caitlin was surprised with all the violations and fouls she got away with last night. I'ma have to look up Seattle's postgame presser - I bet they were flabbergasted at this traveling circus.

5 Steps w/o a dribble or a shot Mfs be talkin about Caitlin's skills and what not but this chick be traveling all over the court. How many times does she travel a game to step back and create space. And this one here is INSANE. 5 steps before a pass, so you can't claim she was gathering for a shot or that dumbass zero step cop out. I betchu even Caitlin was surprised with all the violations and fouls she got away with last night. I'ma have to look up Seattle's postgame presser - I bet they were flabbergasted at this traveling circus.

Apex Jones HACKED

35,926 просмотров • 9 дней назад