Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

**MH370x Science Supplemental** Macroscopic Decoherence - Bose Einstein Condensate We have figured out how they teleported Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. Macroscopic teleportation is real. A Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter of a dilute gas of bosons cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (that is,...

AshtonForbes's profile picture

Ashton Forbes

301,136 subscribers

41,742 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Roy
Royvor 2 Jahren

Euerka 😉

Profilbild von Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbesvor 2 Jahren

There you are. I almost credited you in the body but it felt awkward. Thanks again sir. For everyone reading, Roy helped put this all together for me. The phase change is what triggered me once I read about Bose Einstein condensate.

Profilbild von Larry Gerndt🦋
Larry Gerndt🦋vor 2 Jahren

I just finished doing a two-part video on the Reagan briefing, one thing that it confirms is that the scene in Close Encounters where the missing people come back, Director William Casey confirmed that that part of the movie was accurate in the sense that there was an exchange program. We may see these people again.

Profilbild von UAP Islander
UAP Islandervor 2 Jahren

This is all insane but I'm following closely with curiosity......seems like out of a movie. Seems scary when you think about the possibilities if this is all true.

Profilbild von Mitzi Tuvey
Mitzi Tuveyvor 2 Jahren

Just when I thought it couldn't get any stranger.....whatever is next? I can hardly wait!

Profilbild von UFO Sara
UFO Saravor 2 Jahren

So many thoughts. Are you saying the US has learned teleportation? Or NHI? Could this possibly be a test or were there previous tests?

Profilbild von Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbesvor 2 Jahren

This is 100% our tech. I’m absolutely certain now. I would have said it’s a test but this is MH370. I’m now leaning back on espionage, there had to be planning involved in this, I think. Wtf…

Profilbild von Sean Reid
Sean Reidvor 2 Jahren

You should really look at the Philadelphia experiment and Preston Nichols. This tech was being used in 1943…..

Profilbild von WallStreetAdvisor
WallStreetAdvisorvor 2 Jahren

But you need precision mapping of the object, it's material, states, and other properties that allow this material to "Exist" in this "field" (we call our universe). And theoretically inject into any other "field/universe" to recreate.

Profilbild von Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbesvor 2 Jahren

Yep, we have that too. This also requires Superconductivity, in 2014. Welcome to disclosure. This is MH370x.

Ähnliche Videos

The observer effect in quantum physics is the phenomenon where the act of measurement or observation alters the state of a quantum system, causing it to behave differently than it would if unobserved. This interaction often collapses a particle's wave-like potentiality into a definite, measurable state, challenging classical notions of objective reality.
0:26

The observer effect in quantum physics is the phenomenon where the act of measurement or observation alters the state of a quantum system, causing it to behave differently than it would if unobserved. This interaction often collapses a particle's wave-like potentiality into a definite, measurable state, challenging classical notions of objective reality.

Philosophy Of Physics

70,917 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The United States used a macroscopic quantum tunneling protocol on MH370 in a bizarre covert operation against China. They created a magnetic wormhole similar to a maglev train. It is a closed loop protocol that gets around retrocausality. I'm now 100% certain they teleported the plane to the West, backwards in the below video which has coordinates in it. Only problem is we don't know how far. It went to wherever the fourth entangled orb is located and I guarantee you they were filming on the other side.
0:22

The United States used a macroscopic quantum tunneling protocol on MH370 in a bizarre covert operation against China. They created a magnetic wormhole similar to a maglev train. It is a closed loop protocol that gets around retrocausality. I'm now 100% certain they teleported the plane to the West, backwards in the below video which has coordinates in it. Only problem is we don't know how far. It went to wherever the fourth entangled orb is located and I guarantee you they were filming on the other side.

Ashton Forbes

333,167 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A superfluid is a special state of matter that occurs when certain liquids are cooled to extremely low temperatures, causing them to behave in extraordinary ways—most notably flowing with zero viscosity, meaning they experience no internal friction at all. In this state, the liquid can move endlessly without losing energy, climb the walls of a container, pass through microscopic pores that would normally block liquids, and form swirling vortices with perfectly quantized rotation. Superfluidity arises from quantum mechanical effects becoming visible on a macroscopic scale, where a large number of particles act in perfect synchrony as a single quantum entity, as famously observed in liquid helium and in ultracold atomic gases.
0:49

A superfluid is a special state of matter that occurs when certain liquids are cooled to extremely low temperatures, causing them to behave in extraordinary ways—most notably flowing with zero viscosity, meaning they experience no internal friction at all. In this state, the liquid can move endlessly without losing energy, climb the walls of a container, pass through microscopic pores that would normally block liquids, and form swirling vortices with perfectly quantized rotation. Superfluidity arises from quantum mechanical effects becoming visible on a macroscopic scale, where a large number of particles act in perfect synchrony as a single quantum entity, as famously observed in liquid helium and in ultracold atomic gases.

Brian Roemmele

27,804 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

A new scientific understanding of human intuition: 1) We know the body engages in quantum processes despite being “warm, wet and noisy”, conditions for quantum decoherence. Quantum biology is a growing field encapsulating enzyme creation, bird navigation via avian cryptochromes and photosynthesis 2) In science and epistemology we have a problem: why do we see reality in its discrete, macroscopic form and not its probabilistic quantum form? 3) Roger Penrose hypothesized that the brain is a room temperature quantum system collapsing quantum reality into macroscopic reality. Hameroff followed up with a physical candidate for the “collapser”: the microtubules 4) Quantum systems engage in temporal non-locality (along with spatial non-locality). Some hypothesize that in a working quantum computer, we’ll be able to send information back in time. We already can reverse qubit positions in quantum computations! 5) So can the brain also engages in time travel? Why do humans need less information to make snap judgments (than, say, large language models)? Maybe because our brains can access the future. This would might explain remote viewing data as studied by the CIA’s stargate program and validated by President of the American Statistical Society, Jessica Utts (in a more physical model) *I think this this an interesting, generative theory but likely incomplete
1:34

A new scientific understanding of human intuition: 1) We know the body engages in quantum processes despite being “warm, wet and noisy”, conditions for quantum decoherence. Quantum biology is a growing field encapsulating enzyme creation, bird navigation via avian cryptochromes and photosynthesis 2) In science and epistemology we have a problem: why do we see reality in its discrete, macroscopic form and not its probabilistic quantum form? 3) Roger Penrose hypothesized that the brain is a room temperature quantum system collapsing quantum reality into macroscopic reality. Hameroff followed up with a physical candidate for the “collapser”: the microtubules 4) Quantum systems engage in temporal non-locality (along with spatial non-locality). Some hypothesize that in a working quantum computer, we’ll be able to send information back in time. We already can reverse qubit positions in quantum computations! 5) So can the brain also engages in time travel? Why do humans need less information to make snap judgments (than, say, large language models)? Maybe because our brains can access the future. This would might explain remote viewing data as studied by the CIA’s stargate program and validated by President of the American Statistical Society, Jessica Utts (in a more physical model) *I think this this an interesting, generative theory but likely incomplete

Jesse Michels

40,517 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This reminds me of how the orbs spin around the plane. I think they figured out how to teleport by scaling up quantum tunneling. The 'barrier' is spacetime itself. The ZPE that also causes mass/inertia. They thinned the barrier enough by causing vacuum decay when the orbs converge. Huge amount of EM flux pushed aside the ZPE for a brief moment. The false vacuum dropped to a lower energy state of a true vacuum, and the plane teleported.
1:27

This reminds me of how the orbs spin around the plane. I think they figured out how to teleport by scaling up quantum tunneling. The 'barrier' is spacetime itself. The ZPE that also causes mass/inertia. They thinned the barrier enough by causing vacuum decay when the orbs converge. Huge amount of EM flux pushed aside the ZPE for a brief moment. The false vacuum dropped to a lower energy state of a true vacuum, and the plane teleported.

Ashton Forbes

818,859 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Colorado is a national leader on quantum. And we continue pushing the boundaries of what is possible in quantum. We held a Quantum Summit at the Governor’s mansion with leaders from across our state — our leadership is being recognized at the federal level with Colorado’s designation as a TechHub for quantum. We are proud of this significant recognition, which stemmed from a competitive national process, and we expect an equally successful Phase 2 application, unlocking up to $70 million in federal resources for the region. To further boost quantum technologies here in Colorado we’re excited to pursue legislation that will provide meaningful incentives to support Colorado as a leader in quantum.
8:53

Colorado is a national leader on quantum. And we continue pushing the boundaries of what is possible in quantum. We held a Quantum Summit at the Governor’s mansion with leaders from across our state — our leadership is being recognized at the federal level with Colorado’s designation as a TechHub for quantum. We are proud of this significant recognition, which stemmed from a competitive national process, and we expect an equally successful Phase 2 application, unlocking up to $70 million in federal resources for the region. To further boost quantum technologies here in Colorado we’re excited to pursue legislation that will provide meaningful incentives to support Colorado as a leader in quantum.

Governor Jared Polis

20,752 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

6,100-Qubit Processor Shatters Quantum Computing Record | David Nield, ScienceAlert Another major quantum computing record has been broken, and by a considerable margin: physicists have now built an array containing 6,100 qubits, the largest of its type and way above the thousand or so qubits previous systems contained. It's the work of scientists from the California Institute of Technology, who used cesium atoms as their qubits, trapping them in place with a complex system of lasers that acted as tweezers to keep the atoms as stable as possible. Qubits differ from the classical bits of traditional computers by exploiting what's known as a superposition: not just binary states of 1 or 0, but a spread of probabilities that allows for algorithms that can solve problems considered out of reach of conventional computing methods. Related: Quantum Advantage: A Physicist Explains The Future of Computers A lot of qubits will be needed to make quantum algorithms practical, however. One reason for these large arrays is error correction, which helps overcome the inherent fragility of the qubit by providing a surplus to double-check the machine's operation. "This is an exciting moment for neutral-atom quantum computing," says physicist Manuel Endres. "We can now see a pathway to large error-corrected quantum computers. The building blocks are in place." There was no single breakthrough that enabled this jump in qubit numbers, but rather a series of engineering advancements in many key areas – from the laser tweezers to the ultra-high (very low pressure) vacuum chamber. Stability has also been a problem for quantum computing systems. The innovations in this latest array kept qubits in a superposition state for almost 13 seconds – almost ten times longer than previous configurations had managed. What's more, individual qubits could be manipulated with 99.98 percent accuracy, establishing a significant benchmark in the programmability of quantum technology. "Large scale, with more atoms, is often thought to come at the expense of accuracy, but our results show that we can do both," says physicist Gyohei Nomura. "Qubits aren't useful without quality. Now we have quantity and quality." To make quantum computers a practical alternative to modern supercomputers, more qubits and even greater levels of stability will be required. Experts are tackling the problem from several different angles, which is why records for some types of quantum computer don't necessarily apply to others. Next, the researchers need to work on exploiting entanglement, which will enable the system to make the leap from storing information to actually processing it. Not too far in the future, we could be using these computers to discover new materials, matter, and fundamental laws of physics. "It's exciting that we are creating machines to help us learn about the Universe in ways that only quantum mechanics can teach us," says physicist Hannah Manetsch. Read more:
1:54

6,100-Qubit Processor Shatters Quantum Computing Record | David Nield, ScienceAlert Another major quantum computing record has been broken, and by a considerable margin: physicists have now built an array containing 6,100 qubits, the largest of its type and way above the thousand or so qubits previous systems contained. It's the work of scientists from the California Institute of Technology, who used cesium atoms as their qubits, trapping them in place with a complex system of lasers that acted as tweezers to keep the atoms as stable as possible. Qubits differ from the classical bits of traditional computers by exploiting what's known as a superposition: not just binary states of 1 or 0, but a spread of probabilities that allows for algorithms that can solve problems considered out of reach of conventional computing methods. Related: Quantum Advantage: A Physicist Explains The Future of Computers A lot of qubits will be needed to make quantum algorithms practical, however. One reason for these large arrays is error correction, which helps overcome the inherent fragility of the qubit by providing a surplus to double-check the machine's operation. "This is an exciting moment for neutral-atom quantum computing," says physicist Manuel Endres. "We can now see a pathway to large error-corrected quantum computers. The building blocks are in place." There was no single breakthrough that enabled this jump in qubit numbers, but rather a series of engineering advancements in many key areas – from the laser tweezers to the ultra-high (very low pressure) vacuum chamber. Stability has also been a problem for quantum computing systems. The innovations in this latest array kept qubits in a superposition state for almost 13 seconds – almost ten times longer than previous configurations had managed. What's more, individual qubits could be manipulated with 99.98 percent accuracy, establishing a significant benchmark in the programmability of quantum technology. "Large scale, with more atoms, is often thought to come at the expense of accuracy, but our results show that we can do both," says physicist Gyohei Nomura. "Qubits aren't useful without quality. Now we have quantity and quality." To make quantum computers a practical alternative to modern supercomputers, more qubits and even greater levels of stability will be required. Experts are tackling the problem from several different angles, which is why records for some types of quantum computer don't necessarily apply to others. Next, the researchers need to work on exploiting entanglement, which will enable the system to make the leap from storing information to actually processing it. Not too far in the future, we could be using these computers to discover new materials, matter, and fundamental laws of physics. "It's exciting that we are creating machines to help us learn about the Universe in ways that only quantum mechanics can teach us," says physicist Hannah Manetsch. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

43,078 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The double-slit experiment is a key demonstration in quantum physics that reveals the strange behavior of particles like electrons and photons. In the experiment, particles are fired at a barrier with two slits, and a screen records where they land. If both slits are open and no measurement is made, the particles form an interference pattern, like waves overlapping, even when sent one at a time. This suggests that each particle passes through both slits at once in a state called superposition. However, if detectors are placed at the slits to observe which path the particle takes, the interference pattern disappears. The particles then behave like classical objects, going through one slit or the other. This change in behavior simply from observing the system is known as the observer effect, and it highlights a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: measurement affects the outcome. The experiment challenges our understanding of reality, showing that at the quantum level, particles don't have definite states until they are observed 🤓
0:24

The double-slit experiment is a key demonstration in quantum physics that reveals the strange behavior of particles like electrons and photons. In the experiment, particles are fired at a barrier with two slits, and a screen records where they land. If both slits are open and no measurement is made, the particles form an interference pattern, like waves overlapping, even when sent one at a time. This suggests that each particle passes through both slits at once in a state called superposition. However, if detectors are placed at the slits to observe which path the particle takes, the interference pattern disappears. The particles then behave like classical objects, going through one slit or the other. This change in behavior simply from observing the system is known as the observer effect, and it highlights a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: measurement affects the outcome. The experiment challenges our understanding of reality, showing that at the quantum level, particles don't have definite states until they are observed 🤓

𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚆𝙷𝙸𝚃𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙱𝙱𝙸𝚃

51,041 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

In LiveView, we keep the state in one place - the server - and it simplifies a lot. But sometimes the state on the client is preferred, or even necessary, and we can't use LiveView for that part. Unless we have a LiveView that runs on the client 👀 Using Popcorn, we managed to run LiveView fully in the browser – here's a POC 🎉 The approach is to have a fully client-side LiveView rendered by a server-side one, and they can communicate with each other. Try it out:
0:25

In LiveView, we keep the state in one place - the server - and it simplifies a lot. But sometimes the state on the client is preferred, or even necessary, and we can't use LiveView for that part. Unless we have a LiveView that runs on the client 👀 Using Popcorn, we managed to run LiveView fully in the browser – here's a POC 🎉 The approach is to have a fully client-side LiveView rendered by a server-side one, and they can communicate with each other. Try it out:

Elixir by Software Mansion

13,537 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This Remote Viewer Just Dropped a BOMBSHELL Warning of an UNEXPECTED Future U.S. President Change?! Edward Riordan was tasked to look at the future president of 2030 and the data that came back was surprising: "...the idea here is of a new leader stepping in. The person is ripe for the time and timing, feeding off of the angst of the people. This feels like a major shift. But why? I had to wonder. This person will come to power and signify a new phase has begun. This feels future based. Like this plan is being arranged and the person is being groomed now." "...Not not too far out. There seems to be more prep for the individual and the situation that is needed, but I had to wonder what kind of situation are we talking about here? And it seemed crisis based, like someone is brought down in this person is brought in...." "...it feels like a large shift in the structure of things in order out of chaos scenario like Venezuela, a chaotic environment that is being orchestrated into order." "...This person, this person is being presented for this time to the people and the world to see.... But here was this person. They were on a stage, but they didn't have a face. It was very, very strange. They didn't even have a they didn't have a face for some reason." "...It's like the death of a king or a ruler. The country stops. The world stops for a moment. An example would be if something happened to President Trump, the world would stop for a moment. This level of magnitude, the people don't know what to do next." "...Taking advantage of a heightened emotional state to push propaganda and a narrative, this person steps in at a high emotion period with a strong sense of filling someone's shoes or replacing them, possibly due to a death...."
3:41

This Remote Viewer Just Dropped a BOMBSHELL Warning of an UNEXPECTED Future U.S. President Change?! Edward Riordan was tasked to look at the future president of 2030 and the data that came back was surprising: "...the idea here is of a new leader stepping in. The person is ripe for the time and timing, feeding off of the angst of the people. This feels like a major shift. But why? I had to wonder. This person will come to power and signify a new phase has begun. This feels future based. Like this plan is being arranged and the person is being groomed now." "...Not not too far out. There seems to be more prep for the individual and the situation that is needed, but I had to wonder what kind of situation are we talking about here? And it seemed crisis based, like someone is brought down in this person is brought in...." "...it feels like a large shift in the structure of things in order out of chaos scenario like Venezuela, a chaotic environment that is being orchestrated into order." "...This person, this person is being presented for this time to the people and the world to see.... But here was this person. They were on a stage, but they didn't have a face. It was very, very strange. They didn't even have a they didn't have a face for some reason." "...It's like the death of a king or a ruler. The country stops. The world stops for a moment. An example would be if something happened to President Trump, the world would stop for a moment. This level of magnitude, the people don't know what to do next." "...Taking advantage of a heightened emotional state to push propaganda and a narrative, this person steps in at a high emotion period with a strong sense of filling someone's shoes or replacing them, possibly due to a death...."

Future Forecasting Group

64,699 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨To fight digital IDs in the U.S., you must ditch your REAL ID🚨 "The REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license...the federal gov't has hijacked the state DMVs...according to the law [gov't] can require it for anything...the [DHS] Secretary determines." This clip of Twila Brase (Twila Brase, RN, PHN, Author), author and co-founder of Citizens' Council for Health Freedom, is taken from a discussion with Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts) et al. posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 13, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Catherine Austin Fitts: "A REAL ID is something that evolved from an effort to get a national ID at the time of the Patriot Act, and it's been integrated with the driver's licenses in every state. So most people get a REAL ID attached or integrated into their driver's license, correct?" Brase: "Yeah. Although I'd like to say it sort of the other way around. What they have is a real ID, and the federal government is allowing the state to use it for driving. Driving purposes. And so, one of the things I just like to say to get people to understand how this is working is that when you have a REAL ID, the REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license. People see it looks just like their driver's license before they got a REAL ID, but they do notice that there's a star on it. So it's a— It's a whole masquerading process here which is keeping the American people from understanding what's happening. "And essentially the, the federal government has hijacked the state DMVs by virtue of the fact that the legislators around the country, have decided to bow to the federal government to give up the constitutional rights and the 10th Amendment rights of the people and the states and hand it over to the federal government. "So the federal government has nationalized identification and driving privileges. Or you could say that they have nationalized identification through the REAL ID and then told the states, yeah, you can use it as a, as a driver's license. We will allow you to use it as a driver's license, but we require it for getting on a plane, we require it for federal buildings, we require it for nuclear facilities. And according to the law, we can require it for anything that we want that the Secretary determines. "And so... It's a federal ID, and it could be a federal ID that you— that would be required for you to open a bank account, to access medical care, to go to college— or rent a hotel room or rent a car or get married or anything, because that's what the law says. The law says that its official purposes include any purpose that the Secretary of Homeland Security shall determine. So any purpose. And right now, the American people don't realize the system that's being set up here. "I think the other thing to understand about REAL ID is that the federal government is creating a facial recognition system for the country through the REAL ID, because the real ID requires a biometric, starting with the face. And so, you know, the idea that the government is going to— has claimed a right to collect and capture the coordinates of your body for their control should be anathema to every American. "But Americans don't realize this. They don't realize that the picture that's being taken is a digital picture for the creation of a facial recognition system. A government facial recognition system where all of people's faces are being put into a database. And I'm going to add here because a lot of people, they go to the DMV and they don't understand the picture that's being taken. They just think it's a picture, right? They don't, they don't understand. But what they do understand is that when they go to fly, they're being asked to stand in front of a camera there. So what I'd like to say about that is, so this whole facial recognition system is being created through the REAL ID and about 56% of the American public have their faces in the government database already."
3:45

🚨To fight digital IDs in the U.S., you must ditch your REAL ID🚨 "The REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license...the federal gov't has hijacked the state DMVs...according to the law [gov't] can require it for anything...the [DHS] Secretary determines." This clip of Twila Brase (Twila Brase, RN, PHN, Author), author and co-founder of Citizens' Council for Health Freedom, is taken from a discussion with Catherine Austin Fitts (The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts) et al. posted to the Children's Health Defense (Children’s Health Defense) Rumble channel on November 13, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- Catherine Austin Fitts: "A REAL ID is something that evolved from an effort to get a national ID at the time of the Patriot Act, and it's been integrated with the driver's licenses in every state. So most people get a REAL ID attached or integrated into their driver's license, correct?" Brase: "Yeah. Although I'd like to say it sort of the other way around. What they have is a real ID, and the federal government is allowing the state to use it for driving. Driving purposes. And so, one of the things I just like to say to get people to understand how this is working is that when you have a REAL ID, the REAL ID is a federal ID masquerading as a state driver's license. People see it looks just like their driver's license before they got a REAL ID, but they do notice that there's a star on it. So it's a— It's a whole masquerading process here which is keeping the American people from understanding what's happening. "And essentially the, the federal government has hijacked the state DMVs by virtue of the fact that the legislators around the country, have decided to bow to the federal government to give up the constitutional rights and the 10th Amendment rights of the people and the states and hand it over to the federal government. "So the federal government has nationalized identification and driving privileges. Or you could say that they have nationalized identification through the REAL ID and then told the states, yeah, you can use it as a, as a driver's license. We will allow you to use it as a driver's license, but we require it for getting on a plane, we require it for federal buildings, we require it for nuclear facilities. And according to the law, we can require it for anything that we want that the Secretary determines. "And so... It's a federal ID, and it could be a federal ID that you— that would be required for you to open a bank account, to access medical care, to go to college— or rent a hotel room or rent a car or get married or anything, because that's what the law says. The law says that its official purposes include any purpose that the Secretary of Homeland Security shall determine. So any purpose. And right now, the American people don't realize the system that's being set up here. "I think the other thing to understand about REAL ID is that the federal government is creating a facial recognition system for the country through the REAL ID, because the real ID requires a biometric, starting with the face. And so, you know, the idea that the government is going to— has claimed a right to collect and capture the coordinates of your body for their control should be anathema to every American. "But Americans don't realize this. They don't realize that the picture that's being taken is a digital picture for the creation of a facial recognition system. A government facial recognition system where all of people's faces are being put into a database. And I'm going to add here because a lot of people, they go to the DMV and they don't understand the picture that's being taken. They just think it's a picture, right? They don't, they don't understand. But what they do understand is that when they go to fly, they're being asked to stand in front of a camera there. So what I'd like to say about that is, so this whole facial recognition system is being created through the REAL ID and about 56% of the American public have their faces in the government database already."

Sense Receptor

47,212 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Question from journalist: “France says that they will support Palestinian statehood in the next short while. You’ve described that as a reward for Hamas here. Other countries like Australia are also walking down this path. Not quite there yet. How much of this is a reward for Hamas, and how much of it is actually countries like those who have repeatedly said Israel does have a right to defend itself, but are now struggling to stomach what they’re saying you and your military are doing in Gaza?” -- Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Response: “Well, first of all, those who say that Israel has a right to defend itself are also saying, but don’t exercise that right. When we do what any country would do, faced with this genocidal terrorist organization that has performed the worst attack on Jews since the Holocaust, I think we’re actually applying force judiciously. And they know it. They know what they would do if they’re right next to Melbourne or right next to Sydney. You had this horrific attacks. I think you would do it, at least what we’re doing, probably─ maybe not as efficiently and as precisely as we’re doing it. We’ve lost quite a few soldiers in that effort. But, that’s the first thing. I think that, the second thing you ask is a Palestinian state. Well, the assumption, the prevailing assumption, in this, is that the problem that we have with the Palestinians is the absence of a Palestinian state. And if they were given a Palestinian state, they would stop the efforts to destroy the Jewish state. But the Palestinians were offered a state many times, including in the partition resolution, and they turned it down. They were offered statehood by my predecessors with lavish, lavish concessions. They turned it down. Because the Palestinians are not about creating a state; they’re about destroying a state. That’s why they opposed the Jewish national movement to create a state. It’s called Zionism. They opposed it before the inception of the Jewish state, and they’ve opposed it since. They’ve opposed it when they had Judea and Samaria, the West Bank and Gaza in their whole. They didn’t say, let’s start, let’s create a state there. They didn’t say that, because, again, their goal is the destruction of a state. It defies imagination or understanding how intelligent people around the world, okay, including seasoned diplomats, government leaders and respected journalists, fall for this absurdity. It’s so easy to verify, you know. And look at the PA. Okay. Look at the Palestinian National movement today is divided between two forces: The Palestinian Authority in Judea and Samaria, and Hamas in Gaza. Okay. Hamas in Gaza had a de facto state. It had a state and it used it to launch a war of terror against Israel, because their doctrine, that is, that the destruction of Israel should proceed with forceful and direct military and terrorist moves. That’s what they did on October 7th. That’s what they’ll do again if we don’t destroy them. The Palestinian Authority, on the other hand, says, ‘No. First, Israel has to be reduced to indefensible boundaries. You’ve got to get them out. With the ICC, with the UN, with the Security Council resolutions: Drive them to indefensible boundaries and then deliver the blow, because Israel is too strong in its present configuration.’ These discussions are open. They’re held. Anybody─ you don’t need Israeli Intel for it, believe me. You can just scour the web, you’ll find it. Okay. So they have no difference about the goal. That’s why the Palestinian children in Judea and Samaria and the Palestinian children, that is, the Palestinian children under the PA, and the Palestinian children under Hamas are educated with exactly the same textbooks. That’s why the PA calls its public squares against mass killers of Jews. That’s why they have pay for slay: The more Jews you murder, the more you get paid. Or your family gets paid. I mean, so that that’s the crux of the problem. The real reason that this conflict persists is not because of the absence of a Palestinian state, but the persistent Palestinian refusal to recognize a Jewish state in any boundary. Now, when you give them a Palestinian state, when they haven’t abandoned the goal of destroying the Jewish state, all you’re doing is you’re making, you’re bringing the next war closer. Again, Hamas had a state. You just brought the war closer. And if you did the same thing in Judea and Samaria, right above Tel Aviv, enveloping Jerusalem, some say cutting Jerusalem into two, that’s all that’s gonna happen. You’re going to have the radicals again take it over, Iran, take it over, and start a state from improved boundaries, start a war with improved boundaries. That’s not going to happen. I think the solution to this problem is that the Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves in the places where they live, and none of the powers to threaten Israel. They should obviously reform their whole education system. They should reform their whole historical outlook and say, ‘All right, you know, we accept that Israel is here to stay,’ not as a fact, as a physical or geographic fact, but as a fact of historical equity. You know, if they want to live here, next to us, they have to stop seeking our destruction. And to give them an independent state, with all the trimmings, is to invite a future war and a certain war. And that’s something that, today the Israeli public forcefully opposes. Before the war, by the way, it was about, you know, a third [for a Palestinian state] / two thirds [against], in the overall population. Probably 60 [against a Palestinian state]/40 for a state. Or even more, against [a state] in the Jewish population. But now it’s changed more dramatically [to more against a state]. I mean, we had a vote in the Knesset, a few months ago, about the possibility, you know, of having a Palestinian state. And the result was 99 to 9. 99 to 9. And that covers a very broad spectrum. And today most of the Jewish public is committed – is against the Palestinian state for the simple reason that they know it won’t bring peace, but it’ll bring war. To have uh, European countries, and Australia, march into that rabbit hole – just like that, fall right into it ─ and buy this canard is disappointing. And I think it’s actually shameful. But it’s not going to change our position. Again, we will not commit national suicide to get a good op-ed for two minutes. We won’t do that. Thank you very much.”
6:53

Question from journalist: “France says that they will support Palestinian statehood in the next short while. You’ve described that as a reward for Hamas here. Other countries like Australia are also walking down this path. Not quite there yet. How much of this is a reward for Hamas, and how much of it is actually countries like those who have repeatedly said Israel does have a right to defend itself, but are now struggling to stomach what they’re saying you and your military are doing in Gaza?” -- Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Response: “Well, first of all, those who say that Israel has a right to defend itself are also saying, but don’t exercise that right. When we do what any country would do, faced with this genocidal terrorist organization that has performed the worst attack on Jews since the Holocaust, I think we’re actually applying force judiciously. And they know it. They know what they would do if they’re right next to Melbourne or right next to Sydney. You had this horrific attacks. I think you would do it, at least what we’re doing, probably─ maybe not as efficiently and as precisely as we’re doing it. We’ve lost quite a few soldiers in that effort. But, that’s the first thing. I think that, the second thing you ask is a Palestinian state. Well, the assumption, the prevailing assumption, in this, is that the problem that we have with the Palestinians is the absence of a Palestinian state. And if they were given a Palestinian state, they would stop the efforts to destroy the Jewish state. But the Palestinians were offered a state many times, including in the partition resolution, and they turned it down. They were offered statehood by my predecessors with lavish, lavish concessions. They turned it down. Because the Palestinians are not about creating a state; they’re about destroying a state. That’s why they opposed the Jewish national movement to create a state. It’s called Zionism. They opposed it before the inception of the Jewish state, and they’ve opposed it since. They’ve opposed it when they had Judea and Samaria, the West Bank and Gaza in their whole. They didn’t say, let’s start, let’s create a state there. They didn’t say that, because, again, their goal is the destruction of a state. It defies imagination or understanding how intelligent people around the world, okay, including seasoned diplomats, government leaders and respected journalists, fall for this absurdity. It’s so easy to verify, you know. And look at the PA. Okay. Look at the Palestinian National movement today is divided between two forces: The Palestinian Authority in Judea and Samaria, and Hamas in Gaza. Okay. Hamas in Gaza had a de facto state. It had a state and it used it to launch a war of terror against Israel, because their doctrine, that is, that the destruction of Israel should proceed with forceful and direct military and terrorist moves. That’s what they did on October 7th. That’s what they’ll do again if we don’t destroy them. The Palestinian Authority, on the other hand, says, ‘No. First, Israel has to be reduced to indefensible boundaries. You’ve got to get them out. With the ICC, with the UN, with the Security Council resolutions: Drive them to indefensible boundaries and then deliver the blow, because Israel is too strong in its present configuration.’ These discussions are open. They’re held. Anybody─ you don’t need Israeli Intel for it, believe me. You can just scour the web, you’ll find it. Okay. So they have no difference about the goal. That’s why the Palestinian children in Judea and Samaria and the Palestinian children, that is, the Palestinian children under the PA, and the Palestinian children under Hamas are educated with exactly the same textbooks. That’s why the PA calls its public squares against mass killers of Jews. That’s why they have pay for slay: The more Jews you murder, the more you get paid. Or your family gets paid. I mean, so that that’s the crux of the problem. The real reason that this conflict persists is not because of the absence of a Palestinian state, but the persistent Palestinian refusal to recognize a Jewish state in any boundary. Now, when you give them a Palestinian state, when they haven’t abandoned the goal of destroying the Jewish state, all you’re doing is you’re making, you’re bringing the next war closer. Again, Hamas had a state. You just brought the war closer. And if you did the same thing in Judea and Samaria, right above Tel Aviv, enveloping Jerusalem, some say cutting Jerusalem into two, that’s all that’s gonna happen. You’re going to have the radicals again take it over, Iran, take it over, and start a state from improved boundaries, start a war with improved boundaries. That’s not going to happen. I think the solution to this problem is that the Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves in the places where they live, and none of the powers to threaten Israel. They should obviously reform their whole education system. They should reform their whole historical outlook and say, ‘All right, you know, we accept that Israel is here to stay,’ not as a fact, as a physical or geographic fact, but as a fact of historical equity. You know, if they want to live here, next to us, they have to stop seeking our destruction. And to give them an independent state, with all the trimmings, is to invite a future war and a certain war. And that’s something that, today the Israeli public forcefully opposes. Before the war, by the way, it was about, you know, a third [for a Palestinian state] / two thirds [against], in the overall population. Probably 60 [against a Palestinian state]/40 for a state. Or even more, against [a state] in the Jewish population. But now it’s changed more dramatically [to more against a state]. I mean, we had a vote in the Knesset, a few months ago, about the possibility, you know, of having a Palestinian state. And the result was 99 to 9. 99 to 9. And that covers a very broad spectrum. And today most of the Jewish public is committed – is against the Palestinian state for the simple reason that they know it won’t bring peace, but it’ll bring war. To have uh, European countries, and Australia, march into that rabbit hole – just like that, fall right into it ─ and buy this canard is disappointing. And I think it’s actually shameful. But it’s not going to change our position. Again, we will not commit national suicide to get a good op-ed for two minutes. We won’t do that. Thank you very much.”

Max 📟

77,213 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

There is a well-known test for deciding whether a nation can become a state. When people come to me and ask, "Isn't it so unfair that the Palestinians don't have a state?" the first thing I tell them is they do have a state, it's called Jordan. That was broken off from the British Mandate of Palestine as a state from the Arabs in 1920 to create an Arab Palestinian state. The problem is that there's a four-part test that comes from the Montevideo Convention in 1933 that asks four simple questions to decide whether a nation is a legitimate state. 1. Do we have a defined population? 2. Do we have a defined borders? 3. Do we have one single effective government? 4. Do we have the capacity to conduct foreign relations? There is no dispute that Israel met all of those factors in 1948 when it was created, that it has met those four factors every single second of every day since 1948. By the way, interestingly, the supposed Palestinian state, which 140 some odd countries in the world have now recognized, fails at least two of those four factors. And there's really no dispute about that. It doesn't have defined borders. In fact, all of the European countries that recently recognized that state were unwilling in any of their press releases or subsequent statements to define what those borders are because they know that they don't know. And second, most importantly, it's not governed by one government, let alone an effective one. Hamas rules part of Gaza, Israel rules the other part. The Palestinian Authority rules some parts of the West Bank, Judea and Samaria, Israel rules other parts.
2:02

There is a well-known test for deciding whether a nation can become a state. When people come to me and ask, "Isn't it so unfair that the Palestinians don't have a state?" the first thing I tell them is they do have a state, it's called Jordan. That was broken off from the British Mandate of Palestine as a state from the Arabs in 1920 to create an Arab Palestinian state. The problem is that there's a four-part test that comes from the Montevideo Convention in 1933 that asks four simple questions to decide whether a nation is a legitimate state. 1. Do we have a defined population? 2. Do we have a defined borders? 3. Do we have one single effective government? 4. Do we have the capacity to conduct foreign relations? There is no dispute that Israel met all of those factors in 1948 when it was created, that it has met those four factors every single second of every day since 1948. By the way, interestingly, the supposed Palestinian state, which 140 some odd countries in the world have now recognized, fails at least two of those four factors. And there's really no dispute about that. It doesn't have defined borders. In fact, all of the European countries that recently recognized that state were unwilling in any of their press releases or subsequent statements to define what those borders are because they know that they don't know. And second, most importantly, it's not governed by one government, let alone an effective one. Hamas rules part of Gaza, Israel rules the other part. The Palestinian Authority rules some parts of the West Bank, Judea and Samaria, Israel rules other parts.

Roy K. Altman

49,639 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

There's a lot of bullshit in the UFO subject but as unbelievable as it may sound, there are things in our skies that can and do respond to human consciousness. Humans who are engaging in peaceful attempts to initiate a form of contact with other intelligences, using the human mind/consciousness as the communicatory medium through which an exchange of information can take place (Quantum Communication / Instantaneously at all points in spacetime) seem to be engaging in a form of bio-hacking and quantum effects scaling. The ancient meditative / mystic practices of our ancestors, who had a far more sophisticated science of consciousness than ourselves, allow the modern day participant to enter into a more receptive state of consciousness which, in a scientific framework, translates to increased intensity/amplitude of bio-energetic effects in the Human body (EM-Field, Biophotonic Output, Piezoelectric Output, Quantum Interactions within Microtubules etc. The orbs are real, whatever they are, and they respond to genuine moments of conscious expansion / heightened reception within human beings who are directing that energy towards the intention/desire to have a form of "contact" It happened to me, it can happen to you.
20:42

There's a lot of bullshit in the UFO subject but as unbelievable as it may sound, there are things in our skies that can and do respond to human consciousness. Humans who are engaging in peaceful attempts to initiate a form of contact with other intelligences, using the human mind/consciousness as the communicatory medium through which an exchange of information can take place (Quantum Communication / Instantaneously at all points in spacetime) seem to be engaging in a form of bio-hacking and quantum effects scaling. The ancient meditative / mystic practices of our ancestors, who had a far more sophisticated science of consciousness than ourselves, allow the modern day participant to enter into a more receptive state of consciousness which, in a scientific framework, translates to increased intensity/amplitude of bio-energetic effects in the Human body (EM-Field, Biophotonic Output, Piezoelectric Output, Quantum Interactions within Microtubules etc. The orbs are real, whatever they are, and they respond to genuine moments of conscious expansion / heightened reception within human beings who are directing that energy towards the intention/desire to have a form of "contact" It happened to me, it can happen to you.

Jay Anderson

29,118 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

🇺🇸 SEC. RUBIO: “UKRAINE HAS PUSHED RUSSIA BACK, BUT THIS IS NOW A WAR OF ATTRITION” Secretary of State Rubio reflected on Ukraine’s hard-fought gains and the brutal cost of the ongoing conflict, warning that the war has shifted into a devastating stalemate: “What people forget, Sean, is that at some point in this war, Russia controlled substantially more territory in Ukraine than they do now. If you look at the map from March or April after the invasion, or even May, compared to now, the Ukrainians have pushed the Russians way back from where they were. They’ve already achieved tremendous things because of their bravery, their courage, and how hard they’ve fought. But the reality is this has now become a war of attrition. And sadly, the Russians have shown their willingness to sacrifice 7,000 soldiers a week in an effort to achieve this. Putin said a couple of weeks ago it may take longer and cost more than they want, but they will get it done. That’s their mentality, and what we’re trying to see now is whether it’s possible to end the war in a way that protects Ukraine’s future.” Source: Sean Hannity 🇺🇸
1:25

🇺🇸 SEC. RUBIO: “UKRAINE HAS PUSHED RUSSIA BACK, BUT THIS IS NOW A WAR OF ATTRITION” Secretary of State Rubio reflected on Ukraine’s hard-fought gains and the brutal cost of the ongoing conflict, warning that the war has shifted into a devastating stalemate: “What people forget, Sean, is that at some point in this war, Russia controlled substantially more territory in Ukraine than they do now. If you look at the map from March or April after the invasion, or even May, compared to now, the Ukrainians have pushed the Russians way back from where they were. They’ve already achieved tremendous things because of their bravery, their courage, and how hard they’ve fought. But the reality is this has now become a war of attrition. And sadly, the Russians have shown their willingness to sacrifice 7,000 soldiers a week in an effort to achieve this. Putin said a couple of weeks ago it may take longer and cost more than they want, but they will get it done. That’s their mentality, and what we’re trying to see now is whether it’s possible to end the war in a way that protects Ukraine’s future.” Source: Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

Mario Nawfal

78,676 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This family checked into an Airbnb in San Diego, California They look at this well and there is a large picture of people at the beach. The dad looks at it and says, “That looks like me” about a guy in the water The picture is of them, the girls, the dad, the whole family is at the beach playing in the water in this painting on the wall of the Airbnb they just checked into According to AI, the odds of this happening are so extremely low it’s hard to comprehend The odds are 1 in hundreds of millions for a random booking to have this picture of you
1:32

This family checked into an Airbnb in San Diego, California They look at this well and there is a large picture of people at the beach. The dad looks at it and says, “That looks like me” about a guy in the water The picture is of them, the girls, the dad, the whole family is at the beach playing in the water in this painting on the wall of the Airbnb they just checked into According to AI, the odds of this happening are so extremely low it’s hard to comprehend The odds are 1 in hundreds of millions for a random booking to have this picture of you

Wall Street Apes

7,063,200 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen