Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Mikel #ARTETA - coaching methods - Explaining idea behind ”hexagon” shape field in positional game (6v6+4) Same exercise as down below ⬇️ - The fullback wide to wide winger pass can be an efficient press-trigger > wants to create better angles between ”wide players”

815,752 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

9 Yorum

Dr. Rajpal Brar, DPT profil fotoğrafı
Dr. Rajpal Brar, DPT3 yıl önce

Love this. Thanks for sharing

Ishan D profil fotoğrafı
Ishan D3 yıl önce

@clivepafc this is what you mentioned on saka on the pod it seems…

Diego Castillo profil fotoğrafı
Diego Castillo3 yıl önce

mira @elchefhugord

Ali Baba Abdulkarim profil fotoğrafı
Ali Baba Abdulkarim3 yıl önce

So complicated and detailed !! It makes me appreciate the work he is doing as manager

CES profil fotoğrafı
CES3 yıl önce

Are you authorized to post this?

Satyakiiii🔰 profil fotoğrafı
Satyakiiii🔰3 yıl önce

Interesting 🤔

Dani De Oliveira S. 🇻🇪🇧🇷🇪🇦| Insta @danideo7 profil fotoğrafı
Dani De Oliveira S. 🇻🇪🇧🇷🇪🇦| Insta @danideo73 yıl önce

What is new ? Do not see any difference with a positional progression excercise.

a de i ce profil fotoğrafı
a de i ce3 yıl önce

ssst..it must be confidential

JayMoe profil fotoğrafı
JayMoe3 yıl önce

Wow very impressive. But isn't analysing Arteta's tactics no the brightest thing to do with a big game on the horizon

Benzer Videolar

Hexagons and Octagons Those who follow football and coaching will be well aware that there are trends that emerge and become the great break through in coaching, only to vanish quite quickly. A few stick around and become a staple. Such as the rondo, or the 4v4+4 Guardiola rondo variation. One that did not stick around in the coaching collective consciousness that possible should have was Thomas Tuchel’s use of hexagonal and octagonal playing areas in training sessions. Tuchel explained that cutting off the corners and angling the pitch forced “sharp diagonal” passes that would help break the press. The positioning of players outside the hexagon/octagon or players close to the edges will be manipulated into an open body shape by the angles of the pitch. Players are impacted by environmental constraints and embodied cognition, where the geography of the playing area influences their actions. This influence spreads to the creation of triangles and diamonds within the playing area due to the “funnel” like nature of the playing area. We can use the cut outside angles by placing bounce or target players on the exterior, influencing the movement and organisation internally. The inside players will not have to move wide as those areas are occupied. The internal players will seek to create passing angles using the positioning of the outside players and their internal team mates. The diamonds and triangles will appear. If we leave the spaces on the outside empty players can move to fill the spaces. These act as free spaces to receive from the goalkeeper or open spaces for attackers to overlap into, encouraging attacking combination play and crosses. A different way of using the space is to remove goals and goalkeepers from the ends and place bounce/target players on the outside. Players now can combine with the outside players, when they do so they are then free to finish into the outside goals. The condition can be extended to combining with the target player in the opposite side of the pitch before scoring, adding an element of switching play. The hexagon and octagon are versatile spaces that help to replicate aspects of the game. By funneling the spaces we impact players body shape, ability to play forward quickly, team shape (or small group shapes), players cutting in, defending centrally, the types of combination used and the angles of line breaking pass (diagonals). The angles are hugely significant for teams that value combinations and possession football, Straight passes and receiving angles are much easier to intercept and carry high risks for being counter attacked. Short diagonals can bypass players and attacking shapes, creating angled connections. If an angles pass is given away there is still a risk of being counter attacked but there is more chance of having players around the ball to regain possession. To counter press. The question that emerges is should we then be using hexagons and octagons more? If they are of greater benefit than squares and rectangles, why use them? Should all pitches, including those of a small sided nature be hexagonal? Can the rondo square be replaced by the rondo octagon?

TheBeardedCoach

13,461 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce