正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 Mind-blowing stuff: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed—then they snap into particles. 🤯 What if our reality only "renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? Check out this episode from The Why Files breaking it down, tying it to... show more

Interstellar

102,321 subscribers

120,272 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 The double slit experiment keeps resurfacing for a reason particles behave like waves until they’re observed, then suddenly “choose” a state. Reality doesn’t just exist… it responds. If observation changes outcome, then consciousness isn’t just a passive observer ,it’s part of the system itself. That’s where simulation theory starts creeping in: a universe that only fully “renders” when measured. The deeper question isn’t whether this proves we’re in a simulation… it’s why reality behaves like it’s waiting to be seen.

🚨 The double slit experiment keeps resurfacing for a reason particles behave like waves until they’re observed, then suddenly “choose” a state. Reality doesn’t just exist… it responds. If observation changes outcome, then consciousness isn’t just a passive observer ,it’s part of the system itself. That’s where simulation theory starts creeping in: a universe that only fully “renders” when measured. The deeper question isn’t whether this proves we’re in a simulation… it’s why reality behaves like it’s waiting to be seen.

T R U T H P O L E

12,865 次观看 • 4 个月前

The double-slit experiment is a key demonstration in quantum physics that reveals the strange behavior of particles like electrons and photons. In the experiment, particles are fired at a barrier with two slits, and a screen records where they land. If both slits are open and no measurement is made, the particles form an interference pattern, like waves overlapping, even when sent one at a time. This suggests that each particle passes through both slits at once in a state called superposition. However, if detectors are placed at the slits to observe which path the particle takes, the interference pattern disappears. The particles then behave like classical objects, going through one slit or the other. This change in behavior simply from observing the system is known as the observer effect, and it highlights a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: measurement affects the outcome. The experiment challenges our understanding of reality, showing that at the quantum level, particles don't have definite states until they are observed 🤓

The double-slit experiment is a key demonstration in quantum physics that reveals the strange behavior of particles like electrons and photons. In the experiment, particles are fired at a barrier with two slits, and a screen records where they land. If both slits are open and no measurement is made, the particles form an interference pattern, like waves overlapping, even when sent one at a time. This suggests that each particle passes through both slits at once in a state called superposition. However, if detectors are placed at the slits to observe which path the particle takes, the interference pattern disappears. The particles then behave like classical objects, going through one slit or the other. This change in behavior simply from observing the system is known as the observer effect, and it highlights a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: measurement affects the outcome. The experiment challenges our understanding of reality, showing that at the quantum level, particles don't have definite states until they are observed 🤓

𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚆𝙷𝙸𝚃𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙱𝙱𝙸𝚃

51,041 次观看 • 6 个月前

NASA Physicist Thomas Campbell explains the proof that we live in a Simulation 100% - “We Live in a Simulation – And I Can Prove It With Physics” “In a virtual reality, the highest speed you can go contiguously — not teleporting, but actually moving — is one pixel of distance for one pixel of time. That’s the Planck length over Planck time. That’s why nothing can go faster than light. Entanglement isn’t two separate particles magically talking to each other. It’s one system. Think of a two-by-four a million miles long. When you flip one end, the other end flips at the same instant because it’s the same thing. This reality only renders what’s being observed. That’s why the double-slit experiment works the way it does — until something interacts with it, it stays as probability.”

NASA Physicist Thomas Campbell explains the proof that we live in a Simulation 100% - “We Live in a Simulation – And I Can Prove It With Physics” “In a virtual reality, the highest speed you can go contiguously — not teleporting, but actually moving — is one pixel of distance for one pixel of time. That’s the Planck length over Planck time. That’s why nothing can go faster than light. Entanglement isn’t two separate particles magically talking to each other. It’s one system. Think of a two-by-four a million miles long. When you flip one end, the other end flips at the same instant because it’s the same thing. This reality only renders what’s being observed. That’s why the double-slit experiment works the way it does — until something interacts with it, it stays as probability.”

Defiant Ghost

364,461 次观看 • 20 天前

Elon Musk: If simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like in this version of reality, on this layer of reality, when a simulation goes in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. I have a theory here. If simulation theory is correct, then there’s a tendency toward interesting outcomes. Because in this reality, when something is boring, we don’t keep paying for it. We stop the simulation. The boring ones don’t survive. As long as they’re interesting, they’ll keep paying the bills. Whatever the equivalent is of the cosmic AWS bill that this reality is running on, if things remain interesting enough, they’ll keep paying to keep it running.

Elon Musk: If simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like in this version of reality, on this layer of reality, when a simulation goes in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. I have a theory here. If simulation theory is correct, then there’s a tendency toward interesting outcomes. Because in this reality, when something is boring, we don’t keep paying for it. We stop the simulation. The boring ones don’t survive. As long as they’re interesting, they’ll keep paying the bills. Whatever the equivalent is of the cosmic AWS bill that this reality is running on, if things remain interesting enough, they’ll keep paying to keep it running.

Ian Miles Cheong

39,414 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 Linda Moulton Howe: "We are living in a Computer Simulated Universe" Physicist Jim Gates found ERROR-CORRECTING CODES in quarks & leptons... exactly like the ones running our computers on Earth! "A 2017 paper [gives] substantial evidence" we're in a HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE. "The projector cannot be in the same room with the holograms. Mathematically, it does not work... It's being projected by something you do not see... Like magic." This is the Simulation Theory clip from their mind-blowing Gaia interview. The great awakening is accelerating in 2026. "The odds are billions to one that we are in what is called a base universe, meaning natural evolution." - Elon Musk What "glitches" have YOU personally experienced in reality? Mandela effects? Déjà vu on steroids? Time slips? Do you buy the holographic projector theory — are we just light projections from another dimension? Is this why UFOs/NHI seem to bend physics? Drop your wildest simulation stories or theories below 👇

🚨 Linda Moulton Howe: "We are living in a Computer Simulated Universe" Physicist Jim Gates found ERROR-CORRECTING CODES in quarks & leptons... exactly like the ones running our computers on Earth! "A 2017 paper [gives] substantial evidence" we're in a HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE. "The projector cannot be in the same room with the holograms. Mathematically, it does not work... It's being projected by something you do not see... Like magic." This is the Simulation Theory clip from their mind-blowing Gaia interview. The great awakening is accelerating in 2026. "The odds are billions to one that we are in what is called a base universe, meaning natural evolution." - Elon Musk What "glitches" have YOU personally experienced in reality? Mandela effects? Déjà vu on steroids? Time slips? Do you buy the holographic projector theory — are we just light projections from another dimension? Is this why UFOs/NHI seem to bend physics? Drop your wildest simulation stories or theories below 👇

Interstellar

43,097 次观看 • 4 个月前

$Robert Edward Grant on Simulation Theory: "We don't manifest our future - We just remember the path we chose." 😱 "We live in a spiritual life simulation in the form of a dream" At the heart of reality lies hidden mathematical code of sacred geometry, fractals, and patterns echoing through da Vinci, ancient Egypt, and beyond. "Is Reality a Simulation?" Grant explores how math serves as the source code of existence, with consciousness tuning into a non local field like a radio. Thoughts aren't confined to the brain, and what we perceive as solid matter may be rendered reality. "Nothing's ever hidden so that it'll never be found." This mind bending discussion fuses science, spirituality, and ancient wisdom, showing we're on the edge of awakening to the true architecture of our world. What if becoming lucid in the simulation changes everything?$

Robert Edward Grant on Simulation Theory: "We don't manifest our future - We just remember the path we chose." 😱 "We live in a spiritual life simulation in the form of a dream" At the heart of reality lies hidden mathematical code of sacred geometry, fractals, and patterns echoing through da Vinci, ancient Egypt, and beyond. "Is Reality a Simulation?" Grant explores how math serves as the source code of existence, with consciousness tuning into a non local field like a radio. Thoughts aren't confined to the brain, and what we perceive as solid matter may be rendered reality. "Nothing's ever hidden so that it'll never be found." This mind bending discussion fuses science, spirituality, and ancient wisdom, showing we're on the edge of awakening to the true architecture of our world. What if becoming lucid in the simulation changes everything?

Interstellar

37,787 次观看 • 2 个月前

We were all lied to about our reality, it is not fixed. We live in a simulation and we are the projectors. Our beliefs and knowing creates our reality. This is a subject that I have deeply researched because I love physics. Everything is energy and nothing is solid. I could go on and on with proofs. Look up the double slit experiment and Donald Hoffman simulation on YouTube!

We were all lied to about our reality, it is not fixed. We live in a simulation and we are the projectors. Our beliefs and knowing creates our reality. This is a subject that I have deeply researched because I love physics. Everything is energy and nothing is solid. I could go on and on with proofs. Look up the double slit experiment and Donald Hoffman simulation on YouTube!

Diana ❤️🇺🇸🙏🐸

40,483 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 Roman Yampolsky: "We are DEFINITELY living in a simulation - the probability is pretty close to 100%" 😱 AI safety legend Roman Yampolskiy just broke it down: “I know never to say 100% but pretty close to that.” He’s got the paper too “How to Hack the Simulation.” His big question: Can superintelligent agents jailbreak out of their virtual box? Elon Musk’s one question to AGI? “What’s outside the simulation?” What if this whole reality is just a test… and the real challenge is realizing the world isn’t real? Have you ever felt the glitches? Do you think we can actually escape? What would YOU ask once you broke out? Drop your wildest theory below 👇

🚨 Roman Yampolsky: "We are DEFINITELY living in a simulation - the probability is pretty close to 100%" 😱 AI safety legend Roman Yampolskiy just broke it down: “I know never to say 100% but pretty close to that.” He’s got the paper too “How to Hack the Simulation.” His big question: Can superintelligent agents jailbreak out of their virtual box? Elon Musk’s one question to AGI? “What’s outside the simulation?” What if this whole reality is just a test… and the real challenge is realizing the world isn’t real? Have you ever felt the glitches? Do you think we can actually escape? What would YOU ask once you broke out? Drop your wildest theory below 👇

Interstellar

152,861 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 A BLUEBERRY MATERIALIZES INSIDE A BABY’S SPOON ON CAMERA - “GLITCH IN THE MATRIX” The spoon is empty. The kid moves it for half a second… and a blueberry suddenly appears inside it from nowhere. It just renders into reality like the simulation forgot to load a frame. Slow the footage down and it only gets more impossible. If this isn’t a glitch in the matrix, then explain it. What are we actually seeing happen here?

🚨 A BLUEBERRY MATERIALIZES INSIDE A BABY’S SPOON ON CAMERA - “GLITCH IN THE MATRIX” The spoon is empty. The kid moves it for half a second… and a blueberry suddenly appears inside it from nowhere. It just renders into reality like the simulation forgot to load a frame. Slow the footage down and it only gets more impossible. If this isn’t a glitch in the matrix, then explain it. What are we actually seeing happen here?

HustleBitch

143,533 次观看 • 8 个月前

Rizwan Virk: "All religions were started by someone looking outside the simulation" He says simulation theory and religion might be describing the same thing all along. Many of the world's religious traditions tell us that the world around us is an illusion created for our benefit. He believes most religions started when somebody peeked outside the simulation and saw what was really there. What if this life is like a video game we're all playing? Does rethinking reality this way change how you see your purpose or your beliefs? What's your take?

Rizwan Virk: "All religions were started by someone looking outside the simulation" He says simulation theory and religion might be describing the same thing all along. Many of the world's religious traditions tell us that the world around us is an illusion created for our benefit. He believes most religions started when somebody peeked outside the simulation and saw what was really there. What if this life is like a video game we're all playing? Does rethinking reality this way change how you see your purpose or your beliefs? What's your take?

Interstellar

11,295 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 Billy Carson : "We are living in a Simulation" Quantum physics doesn’t lie. “We’re living in the shadow of a higher dimension.” Scientists created an 8th dimensional quasi-crystal… angled it just right… and it cast a SHADOW SPHERE. That sphere? OUR UNIVERSE. “The angle of a higher multidimensional quasi crystal potentially could be what has created this gigantic sphere we call our universe.” Mind officially blown. Do YOU believe we’re in a simulation? Is this interview on Shawn Ryan Show the proof we’ve been waiting for… or is reality even wilder? Reply with your theory 👇 What if we’re all just NPCs in someone else’s game?

🚨 Billy Carson : "We are living in a Simulation" Quantum physics doesn’t lie. “We’re living in the shadow of a higher dimension.” Scientists created an 8th dimensional quasi-crystal… angled it just right… and it cast a SHADOW SPHERE. That sphere? OUR UNIVERSE. “The angle of a higher multidimensional quasi crystal potentially could be what has created this gigantic sphere we call our universe.” Mind officially blown. Do YOU believe we’re in a simulation? Is this interview on Shawn Ryan Show the proof we’ve been waiting for… or is reality even wilder? Reply with your theory 👇 What if we’re all just NPCs in someone else’s game?

Interstellar

121,082 次观看 • 4 个月前

Elon Musk reveals why he believes the most interesting outcome is always the most likely "If simulation theory is true, it is very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely, because only the simulations that are interesting will continue" "The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting" "In this reality, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations" "When we do millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right. We only care about where it goes wrong" "We keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us" "From a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones" "In order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is you must keep it interesting, or you will be terminated" "Video games have gone from Pong, with two rectangles in a square, to photorealistic with millions of people playing simultaneously, and all of that has occurred in our lifetime" "If that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality. You don't know if what you're seeing is a real video or a fake video" "If we're creating millions, if not billions, of photorealistic simulations of reality, then what are the odds that we're in base reality versus someone else's simulation?" "The most interesting and usually ironic outcome is the most likely. That's a good predictor of the future"

Elon Musk reveals why he believes the most interesting outcome is always the most likely "If simulation theory is true, it is very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely, because only the simulations that are interesting will continue" "The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting" "In this reality, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations" "When we do millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right. We only care about where it goes wrong" "We keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us" "From a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones" "In order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is you must keep it interesting, or you will be terminated" "Video games have gone from Pong, with two rectangles in a square, to photorealistic with millions of people playing simultaneously, and all of that has occurred in our lifetime" "If that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality. You don't know if what you're seeing is a real video or a fake video" "If we're creating millions, if not billions, of photorealistic simulations of reality, then what are the odds that we're in base reality versus someone else's simulation?" "The most interesting and usually ironic outcome is the most likely. That's a good predictor of the future"

Jaynit

10,440 次观看 • 24 天前

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

19,252 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 DeWalt Laser Reveals HIDDEN CODE on Walls Under DMT – Proof We're in a Simulation? 😱 Chase Hughes told Shawn Ryan: "A simple DeWalt laser turns into one of the strangest demonstrations of simulation theory you’ll ever see." "When you look at that, you can see through the wall... You can see through the wall where the laser is." "While you are in the DMT state, you get close to the wall and you can see code that looks kind of like alien writing... or some that look like kanji Japanese characters." "This is permanent solid... if you move your head, the code stays in the same place." "If you put your arm in front of it, the code completely changes, but only right where your arm is." "The first time I saw it, I wept. I wept." Multiple people see the exact same code – no explanation! Mind blown – is reality glitching right in front of us? Have you ever experienced anything like this on psychedelics? Do you think we're living in a simulation with visible code? What would seeing alien-like symbols do to your worldview? Drop your thoughts 👇 #SimulationTheory

🚨 DeWalt Laser Reveals HIDDEN CODE on Walls Under DMT – Proof We're in a Simulation? 😱 Chase Hughes told Shawn Ryan: "A simple DeWalt laser turns into one of the strangest demonstrations of simulation theory you’ll ever see." "When you look at that, you can see through the wall... You can see through the wall where the laser is." "While you are in the DMT state, you get close to the wall and you can see code that looks kind of like alien writing... or some that look like kanji Japanese characters." "This is permanent solid... if you move your head, the code stays in the same place." "If you put your arm in front of it, the code completely changes, but only right where your arm is." "The first time I saw it, I wept. I wept." Multiple people see the exact same code – no explanation! Mind blown – is reality glitching right in front of us? Have you ever experienced anything like this on psychedelics? Do you think we're living in a simulation with visible code? What would seeing alien-like symbols do to your worldview? Drop your thoughts 👇 #SimulationTheory

Interstellar

72,142 次观看 • 4 个月前

Astronomer Marc D'Antonio: UFO's & Flying Saucers are Particle Accelerators 🛸 "The outer ring of UFO's is an accelerator. Flying Saucers are particle accelerators and they're generating particles that surround the craft and close the loop with gravity." He told AJ from The Why Files - They generate fifth dimensional particles to pull the craft into the 5th dimension. "We could actually get to Alpha Centauri in about 20 minutes using this technology... you just hop into the fifth dimension and pop in." Oscillate in and out fast enough and you can sit on the ocean floor as long as you want with zero pressure. Mind-blowing or sci-fi? Is this the real secret behind UFOs? Could they be hiding in our oceans right now? What’s your theory?

Astronomer Marc D'Antonio: UFO's & Flying Saucers are Particle Accelerators 🛸 "The outer ring of UFO's is an accelerator. Flying Saucers are particle accelerators and they're generating particles that surround the craft and close the loop with gravity." He told AJ from The Why Files - They generate fifth dimensional particles to pull the craft into the 5th dimension. "We could actually get to Alpha Centauri in about 20 minutes using this technology... you just hop into the fifth dimension and pop in." Oscillate in and out fast enough and you can sit on the ocean floor as long as you want with zero pressure. Mind-blowing or sci-fi? Is this the real secret behind UFOs? Could they be hiding in our oceans right now? What’s your theory?

Interstellar

17,733 次观看 • 3 个月前

What if the internet isn’t what it used to be or what we think it is at all? The Dead Internet Theory suggests that most of what we see online today, from viral posts to entire discussions, might not even be real. Bots, AI content farms, and government controlled algorithms could be running the digital show, creating the illusion of a living, breathing internet when in reality, it’s a carefully curated simulation designed to shape public opinion and behavior.

What if the internet isn’t what it used to be or what we think it is at all? The Dead Internet Theory suggests that most of what we see online today, from viral posts to entire discussions, might not even be real. Bots, AI content farms, and government controlled algorithms could be running the digital show, creating the illusion of a living, breathing internet when in reality, it’s a carefully curated simulation designed to shape public opinion and behavior.

ConsciouSean

18,946 次观看 • 9 个月前

Elon Musk: “I do have this theory about predicting the future which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely… If simulation theory is accurate, it makes sense because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures, they’re going to stop the simulation when it gets boring… We could be an alien Netflix series and that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good.”

Elon Musk: “I do have this theory about predicting the future which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely… If simulation theory is accurate, it makes sense because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures, they’re going to stop the simulation when it gets boring… We could be an alien Netflix series and that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good.”

Wes Roth

63,562 次观看 • 7 个月前

One of the new conspiracy rabbit holes I've been exploring recently, as many of you have seen from my posts, is Simulation Theory. Part of the reason why I put it off for so long is because, frankly, I thought there wouldn't be that much to explore. "Our world is a video game and we're plugged in like Neo", was pretty much what I expected the long and short of it to be. I was very, very wrong. Simulation Theory has really surprised me, as not only does it tie together lots of head-scratcher open ends to other cosmology and history-related threads in a very logically-satisfying way, but just like the rabbit holes of Old World and Flat Earth, it completely changes the way you look at the world around you, expanding your mind in the process. (Which is beneficial IMO even if it turns out to be completely wrong). One of my favorite examples of how Simulation Theory (A) Changes how you look at your environment around you and (B) Provides satisfying answers to confusing unanswered questions, is the topic of ANCIENT CATHEDRALS. Listen to the below recording to see what I mean...🤯 Then, for a relevant follow-up, watch the QRT'd video by MY LUNCH BREAK exploring the extremely bizarre worldwide network of underground CATACOMBS ☠️ All of these pieces are a giant, interconnected puzzle, just waiting for us to put our heads together and solve 🧠🧩

One of the new conspiracy rabbit holes I've been exploring recently, as many of you have seen from my posts, is Simulation Theory. Part of the reason why I put it off for so long is because, frankly, I thought there wouldn't be that much to explore. "Our world is a video game and we're plugged in like Neo", was pretty much what I expected the long and short of it to be. I was very, very wrong. Simulation Theory has really surprised me, as not only does it tie together lots of head-scratcher open ends to other cosmology and history-related threads in a very logically-satisfying way, but just like the rabbit holes of Old World and Flat Earth, it completely changes the way you look at the world around you, expanding your mind in the process. (Which is beneficial IMO even if it turns out to be completely wrong). One of my favorite examples of how Simulation Theory (A) Changes how you look at your environment around you and (B) Provides satisfying answers to confusing unanswered questions, is the topic of ANCIENT CATHEDRALS. Listen to the below recording to see what I mean...🤯 Then, for a relevant follow-up, watch the QRT'd video by MY LUNCH BREAK exploring the extremely bizarre worldwide network of underground CATACOMBS ☠️ All of these pieces are a giant, interconnected puzzle, just waiting for us to put our heads together and solve 🧠🧩

₿en Wehrman

11,634 次观看 • 26 天前

Thomas Young's double-slit experiment, performed in 1801, is one of the most important demonstrations in physics. It provided strong evidence that light behaves as a wave by producing interference patterns. In the experiment, coherent light is directed at an opaque barrier with two closely spaced slits. The light waves passing through these slits interfere with one another, creating a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen positioned behind the slits. The spacing and location of these fringes depend on the light's wavelength, the distance between the two slits, and the distance to the screen. This experiment established the wave nature of light. The modern understanding of wave-particle duality, where light can also behave like particles (photons), developed in the early 20th century with quantum mechanics, and is beautifully illustrated by modern versions of the double-slit experiment performed with individual photons.

Thomas Young's double-slit experiment, performed in 1801, is one of the most important demonstrations in physics. It provided strong evidence that light behaves as a wave by producing interference patterns. In the experiment, coherent light is directed at an opaque barrier with two closely spaced slits. The light waves passing through these slits interfere with one another, creating a pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen positioned behind the slits. The spacing and location of these fringes depend on the light's wavelength, the distance between the two slits, and the distance to the screen. This experiment established the wave nature of light. The modern understanding of wave-particle duality, where light can also behave like particles (photons), developed in the early 20th century with quantum mechanics, and is beautifully illustrated by modern versions of the double-slit experiment performed with individual photons.

The Math Flow

13,424 次观看 • 5 个月前

Elon Musk: Boring simulations will be terminated. “I have a theory here that if the simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like on this layer of reality, if a simulation is going in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. Arguably the most important thing is to keep things interesting enough so that everyone paying the bills on some cosmic AWS are they going to pay their cosmic AWS bill or whatever the equivalent is that we're running in. And as long as we're interesting, they'll keep paying the bills.” Interview with John Collison and Dwarkesh Patel, February 5, 2026

Elon Musk: Boring simulations will be terminated. “I have a theory here that if the simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like on this layer of reality, if a simulation is going in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. Arguably the most important thing is to keep things interesting enough so that everyone paying the bills on some cosmic AWS are they going to pay their cosmic AWS bill or whatever the equivalent is that we're running in. And as long as we're interesting, they'll keep paying the bills.” Interview with John Collison and Dwarkesh Patel, February 5, 2026

ELON CLIPS

21,944 次观看 • 3 个月前