NASA Physicist Thomas Campbell explains the proof that we live in a Simulation 100% - “We Live in a Simulation – And I Can Prove It With Physics” “In a virtual reality, the highest speed you can go contiguously — not teleporting, but actually moving — is one pixel... of distance for one pixel of time. That’s the Planck length over Planck time. That’s why nothing can go faster than light. Entanglement isn’t two separate particles magically talking to each other. It’s one system. Think of a two-by-four a million miles long. When you flip one end, the other end flips at the same instant because it’s the same thing. This reality only renders what’s being observed. That’s why the double-slit experiment works the way it does — until something interacts with it, it stays as probability.”show more

I think I've seen this guy before

This is a clip from the latest @OMGTheWhyFiles video w/ NASA Physicist Thomas Campbell. You can watch the full video here:

Completely dumb examples. For example, flipping a two by four board cannot happen faster than light from one end to another. I’d bet my life we don’t live in a simulation. How many levels of simulation are above us? One, two, a trillion? If there’s one then there’s likely an extremely high number. That would put us at the bottom of the chain, which would make us unique and special. And we’ve learned through the centuries that we are not special (we used to think we were the center of everything, for example).

Interesting, but I don't see how that proves we are in a simulation? It may just speak to the nature of reality.

I'm going to keep saying this one: Once you can convince enough people they're living in some kind of virtual reality simulation, it will become a whole lot easier to get people to do fkd up sht to each other.

I pixel of distance * 1 pixel of time isn’t a limt, it’s a measurement. This guy’s full of shit.

No. Entangled particles are not "connected" by anything. Yes, they are opposite each other according to conservation of momentum, or particle decay or other, but once the first is measured and the second collapses inversely, entanglement collapses. The second of an entangled pair is simply probable in the opposite direction/momentum when it is measured independently. If measuring along the opposite access from the first measurement, it's 100%; if measuring from, say 45° askew of the first axis of measurement, it's something like 86 1/2% probable. Change either particle now, NOTHING happens to the other one. Bell's inequalities prove that quantum effects exceed any local hidden (connecting) variables. Prove.

the system is God’s mind. you’re welcome.

If it is a simulation, then physics don't apply. 'Physics' changes from computer game to game.

If you divide the length of a hammer by Hammer Time, does this prove a Hammer Hypothesis?

We are being farmed by non-human entities. We have a product, loosh, they consume the product. That is all.

If it's a simulation then that means the state exists of something not being a simulation. other wise theres no such thing as a simulation, it just is. Therefore it's not a simulation. Good try smarty left brain pants. All he's doing is making left brain connections.

In a nutshell:you are an individual portion of larger fractal pattern consisting of all that exists within a digital virtual reality based upon an evolving consciousness. Ch. 86 book 3 “My Big Toe”

What is so stupid about this argument is that it makes absolutely no difference whether a God created the universe as a simulation or as it is lmfao. From our perspective it's completely the same! It's such a pathetic non-argument.

"If this, then that." Is 🔥🔥🔥 Watching people this smart lets me know genetically I would never be more than a hunter gatherer or trades man. And I'm okay with that. 🤣😂🤣

The two by four point is inaccurate. Propagates at the speed of sound through the solid - there is a delay. It’s not instantaneous

The word simulation is not additionally meaningful here

“Think of a two-by-four a million miles long. When you flip one end, the other end flips at the same instant “ That is totally & completely wrong. The force energy to move the 2X4 does not travel instantly through the wood.

I have done hundreds of Chuck Missler bible studies, he has been saying this for close to 30 years

entertained these ideas in the past independently and came to the provisional conclusion that these arguments don’t account for all the data Unfortunately the first two are demonstrably wrong , third is unfalsifiable, still could be true but there’s no way of knowing while being inside , unless we figure out how to psyche nature to show what it doesn’t !! when unobserved !! and how would one know unless you measure that anyways ? Light is not locked to Planck units , can move slowly , Planck units stay the same inside oil , so unless there’s a variability in the pixels dictated by the existence of matter , this is highly doubtful , but a link between the two seems obvious is some way . Entangled particles don’t have a physical connection like a piece of wood , that is the precise problem , if it were so , it wouldnt be weird . Hidden variables are unfortunately unsupported , yet . You could however think of two entangled particles to lie on the opposite ends on a surface of a growing ring of a 3d sphere of EM fluctuation , I.e the 3 dimensional light wave growing in time and expanding. . Still no obvious reason why they should be necessarily retaining information from another point in space time where it was born . You have to invoke some weird instantaneous reset of the sphere when one particle is measured and therein lies the weirdness

I donated money to him to do a project that he said he would prove it’s truly a conscious observer that makes the wave turn into a particle. He started to do it and then just bounced out and ghosted.

He uses law of expectation but then contradicts the double slit observation experiment. It only proves that there are different forces beyond our scope. He doesn't explain improbabilty theory. Or better known law of inevitability. Or even newton's laws. Anyway enjoy the ride.

So if this is a simulation, how do I regenerate when my life functions cease? Will my death collapse the wave function if it’s not observed?

Because the wood in connected through matter. The complete thing that makes this wild is that they are not attached. He lost his credibility with that.

If the universal LLM (which I’ve trademarked as God’s GAN) renders only when necessary to be efficient, then efficiency implies a need to conserve which implies scarcity which implies an economy. Someone has spent a lot of compute tokens on you, so don’t fuck it up this time 😎

Entanglement happens because the process of observing itself changes reality in a manner that we are yet to understand. There is not such thing as "spooky action at a distance". There is no simulation.

1 pixel at a time is proof? why? You can't fall faster than terminal velocity, is that proof of the simulation too? Our lack of understanding of the universe doesn't prove a simulation, or God, or anything, only proves our limited capacities... and some people's Ego.

Self-refuting epistemic insanity. If we live in a simulation, then you could never conclusively prove it. After all, wouldn’t your so-called “proof” be simulated as well? How can simulacra even be regarded as evidentiary or epistemically trustworthy? Gnostic hogwash

We are in a simulation, now what? Is there any applications of this knowledge or is it another “god of the gaps” horseshit and metaphorical nonsense. If it’s a thought experiment then fine. It’s hard to prove anything is “real”, you have to define real first.

Pile of bs. Planck length isn't known to be a pixel, speed of light isn't derived from a simulation's refresh rate, entanglement doesn't imply particles are secretly the same object and double-slit experiment doesn't show that reality only exists when consciously observed

I’m sorry, but the map isn’t the terrain. His own million mile 2 x 4 analogy fails according to his “one unit of movement per time.” twisting a 2 x 4 would not affect the other end at the same instant. Those forces must travel along the length of the 2 x 4 for those million miles

It's a biological simulation, we're brain matter that represents a story that a living biological universe is telling

Well, he does resemble the architect

The first half of this makes sense and is correct. rendering speed is analogous to speed of light. In other words it's the maximum speed of information transfer. The maths is trivial and I'll show the maths in a few days. The second half about Entanglement is wrong. Entanglement is weirder than that.

There is no 'physics' in a simulation. It is just code. You cannot prove the existence of a simulation from WITHIN the simulation