Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨 Mind-blowing stuff: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed—then they snap into particles. 🤯 What if our reality only "renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? Check out this episode from The Why Files breaking it down, tying it to... show more

Interstellar

102,321 subscribers

120,272 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 The double slit experiment keeps resurfacing for a reason particles behave like waves until they’re observed, then suddenly “choose” a state. Reality doesn’t just exist… it responds. If observation changes outcome, then consciousness isn’t just a passive observer ,it’s part of the system itself. That’s where simulation theory starts creeping in: a universe that only fully “renders” when measured. The deeper question isn’t whether this proves we’re in a simulation… it’s why reality behaves like it’s waiting to be seen.

🚨 The double slit experiment keeps resurfacing for a reason particles behave like waves until they’re observed, then suddenly “choose” a state. Reality doesn’t just exist… it responds. If observation changes outcome, then consciousness isn’t just a passive observer ,it’s part of the system itself. That’s where simulation theory starts creeping in: a universe that only fully “renders” when measured. The deeper question isn’t whether this proves we’re in a simulation… it’s why reality behaves like it’s waiting to be seen.

T R U T H P O L E

12,865 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨Multiverse Theory: This Laser Experiment Glitched Reality on Live TV… and a Parallel Reality Appeared. What if every photon is actually traveling through thousands of realities at once? This is the double-slit experiment taken to the extreme — with dozens or even thousands of holes instead of just two. Physicist Dr. David Deutsch breaks it down perfectly: “This means there must be at least thousands of parallel universes. In fact, the theory tells us there are a lot more than that.” What do YOU think — Multiverse or Simulation Theory? Drop your thoughts below!

🚨Multiverse Theory: This Laser Experiment Glitched Reality on Live TV… and a Parallel Reality Appeared. What if every photon is actually traveling through thousands of realities at once? This is the double-slit experiment taken to the extreme — with dozens or even thousands of holes instead of just two. Physicist Dr. David Deutsch breaks it down perfectly: “This means there must be at least thousands of parallel universes. In fact, the theory tells us there are a lot more than that.” What do YOU think — Multiverse or Simulation Theory? Drop your thoughts below!

High Strangeness

48,712 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The double-slit experiment is a key demonstration in quantum physics that reveals the strange behavior of particles like electrons and photons. In the experiment, particles are fired at a barrier with two slits, and a screen records where they land. If both slits are open and no measurement is made, the particles form an interference pattern, like waves overlapping, even when sent one at a time. This suggests that each particle passes through both slits at once in a state called superposition. However, if detectors are placed at the slits to observe which path the particle takes, the interference pattern disappears. The particles then behave like classical objects, going through one slit or the other. This change in behavior simply from observing the system is known as the observer effect, and it highlights a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: measurement affects the outcome. The experiment challenges our understanding of reality, showing that at the quantum level, particles don't have definite states until they are observed 🤓

The double-slit experiment is a key demonstration in quantum physics that reveals the strange behavior of particles like electrons and photons. In the experiment, particles are fired at a barrier with two slits, and a screen records where they land. If both slits are open and no measurement is made, the particles form an interference pattern, like waves overlapping, even when sent one at a time. This suggests that each particle passes through both slits at once in a state called superposition. However, if detectors are placed at the slits to observe which path the particle takes, the interference pattern disappears. The particles then behave like classical objects, going through one slit or the other. This change in behavior simply from observing the system is known as the observer effect, and it highlights a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics: measurement affects the outcome. The experiment challenges our understanding of reality, showing that at the quantum level, particles don't have definite states until they are observed 🤓

𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚆𝙷𝙸𝚃𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙱𝙱𝙸𝚃

51,041 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Joe Rogan & Jesse Michels discuss how "Consciousness renders reality like a video game. Only what is observed gets computed" “There is no tree. There is no forest. If there’s nobody there and it’s not being observed, it’s not being rendered.” In the Copenhagen interpretation, measurement collapses the wave function. Reality stays probabilistic until observation forces a definite outcome. Campbell connects this directly to consciousness: the physical world is a multiplayer virtual reality computed by a larger consciousness system. Your body is the avatar. Your consciousness is the player receiving a personal data stream. Our reality is almost certainly a simulation. Nothing is rendered unless an observer needs the information. The brain itself is not even rendered unless someone opens a skull and looks. Turn your head and the previous scene stops being computed for you, just as a video game only draws what the player is currently facing. This is efficient computer science applied to existence. Probability until measurement. Collapse upon observation. Mind involved in the rendering. The same principle that explains the double slit experiment also explains why the world feels solid only when you engage with it.

Interstellar

22,054 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

NASA Physicist Thomas Campbell explains the proof that we live in a Simulation 100% - “We Live in a Simulation – And I Can Prove It With Physics” “In a virtual reality, the highest speed you can go contiguously — not teleporting, but actually moving — is one pixel of distance for one pixel of time. That’s the Planck length over Planck time. That’s why nothing can go faster than light. Entanglement isn’t two separate particles magically talking to each other. It’s one system. Think of a two-by-four a million miles long. When you flip one end, the other end flips at the same instant because it’s the same thing. This reality only renders what’s being observed. That’s why the double-slit experiment works the way it does — until something interacts with it, it stays as probability.”

NASA Physicist Thomas Campbell explains the proof that we live in a Simulation 100% - “We Live in a Simulation – And I Can Prove It With Physics” “In a virtual reality, the highest speed you can go contiguously — not teleporting, but actually moving — is one pixel of distance for one pixel of time. That’s the Planck length over Planck time. That’s why nothing can go faster than light. Entanglement isn’t two separate particles magically talking to each other. It’s one system. Think of a two-by-four a million miles long. When you flip one end, the other end flips at the same instant because it’s the same thing. This reality only renders what’s being observed. That’s why the double-slit experiment works the way it does — until something interacts with it, it stays as probability.”

Defiant Ghost

366,667 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 Linda Moulton Howe: "We are living in a Computer Simulated Universe" Physicist Jim Gates found ERROR-CORRECTING CODES in quarks & leptons... exactly like the ones running our computers on Earth! "A 2017 paper [gives] substantial evidence" we're in a HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE. "The projector cannot be in the same room with the holograms. Mathematically, it does not work... It's being projected by something you do not see... Like magic." This is the Simulation Theory clip from their mind-blowing Gaia interview. The great awakening is accelerating in 2026. "The odds are billions to one that we are in what is called a base universe, meaning natural evolution." - Elon Musk What "glitches" have YOU personally experienced in reality? Mandela effects? Déjà vu on steroids? Time slips? Do you buy the holographic projector theory — are we just light projections from another dimension? Is this why UFOs/NHI seem to bend physics? Drop your wildest simulation stories or theories below 👇

🚨 Linda Moulton Howe: "We are living in a Computer Simulated Universe" Physicist Jim Gates found ERROR-CORRECTING CODES in quarks & leptons... exactly like the ones running our computers on Earth! "A 2017 paper [gives] substantial evidence" we're in a HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE. "The projector cannot be in the same room with the holograms. Mathematically, it does not work... It's being projected by something you do not see... Like magic." This is the Simulation Theory clip from their mind-blowing Gaia interview. The great awakening is accelerating in 2026. "The odds are billions to one that we are in what is called a base universe, meaning natural evolution." - Elon Musk What "glitches" have YOU personally experienced in reality? Mandela effects? Déjà vu on steroids? Time slips? Do you buy the holographic projector theory — are we just light projections from another dimension? Is this why UFOs/NHI seem to bend physics? Drop your wildest simulation stories or theories below 👇

Interstellar

43,622 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Elon Musk: If simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like in this version of reality, on this layer of reality, when a simulation goes in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. I have a theory here. If simulation theory is correct, then there’s a tendency toward interesting outcomes. Because in this reality, when something is boring, we don’t keep paying for it. We stop the simulation. The boring ones don’t survive. As long as they’re interesting, they’ll keep paying the bills. Whatever the equivalent is of the cosmic AWS bill that this reality is running on, if things remain interesting enough, they’ll keep paying to keep it running.

Elon Musk: If simulation theory is correct, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. Because simulations that are not interesting will be terminated. Just like in this version of reality, on this layer of reality, when a simulation goes in a boring direction, we stop spending effort on it. We terminate the boring simulation. I have a theory here. If simulation theory is correct, then there’s a tendency toward interesting outcomes. Because in this reality, when something is boring, we don’t keep paying for it. We stop the simulation. The boring ones don’t survive. As long as they’re interesting, they’ll keep paying the bills. Whatever the equivalent is of the cosmic AWS bill that this reality is running on, if things remain interesting enough, they’ll keep paying to keep it running.

Ian Miles Cheong

39,414 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

$Robert Edward Grant on Simulation Theory: "We don't manifest our future - We just remember the path we chose." 😱 "We live in a spiritual life simulation in the form of a dream" At the heart of reality lies hidden mathematical code of sacred geometry, fractals, and patterns echoing through da Vinci, ancient Egypt, and beyond. "Is Reality a Simulation?" Grant explores how math serves as the source code of existence, with consciousness tuning into a non local field like a radio. Thoughts aren't confined to the brain, and what we perceive as solid matter may be rendered reality. "Nothing's ever hidden so that it'll never be found." This mind bending discussion fuses science, spirituality, and ancient wisdom, showing we're on the edge of awakening to the true architecture of our world. What if becoming lucid in the simulation changes everything?$

Robert Edward Grant on Simulation Theory: "We don't manifest our future - We just remember the path we chose." 😱 "We live in a spiritual life simulation in the form of a dream" At the heart of reality lies hidden mathematical code of sacred geometry, fractals, and patterns echoing through da Vinci, ancient Egypt, and beyond. "Is Reality a Simulation?" Grant explores how math serves as the source code of existence, with consciousness tuning into a non local field like a radio. Thoughts aren't confined to the brain, and what we perceive as solid matter may be rendered reality. "Nothing's ever hidden so that it'll never be found." This mind bending discussion fuses science, spirituality, and ancient wisdom, showing we're on the edge of awakening to the true architecture of our world. What if becoming lucid in the simulation changes everything?

Interstellar

37,987 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

We were all lied to about our reality, it is not fixed. We live in a simulation and we are the projectors. Our beliefs and knowing creates our reality. This is a subject that I have deeply researched because I love physics. Everything is energy and nothing is solid. I could go on and on with proofs. Look up the double slit experiment and Donald Hoffman simulation on YouTube!

We were all lied to about our reality, it is not fixed. We live in a simulation and we are the projectors. Our beliefs and knowing creates our reality. This is a subject that I have deeply researched because I love physics. Everything is energy and nothing is solid. I could go on and on with proofs. Look up the double slit experiment and Donald Hoffman simulation on YouTube!

Diana ❤️🇺🇸🙏🐸

40,483 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Elon Musk believes that we are in a simulation: "I do have this theory about predicting the future which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely" "If simulation theory is accurate this makes sense because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures they're going to stop the simulation when it gets boring" "This is what we do in reality. If SpaceX is doing simulations to understand how a rocket works we run all these simulations in the computer" "The simulations that we pay attention to are the ones that are the most interesting" "We could be an alien Netflix series and that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good" "If you apply Darwin to simulation theory then only the most interesting simulations will continue" "Therefore the most interesting outcome is the most likely because it's either that or annihilation" "So really we have one goal. Keep it interesting."

Elon Musk believes that we are in a simulation: "I do have this theory about predicting the future which is that the most interesting outcome is the most likely" "If simulation theory is accurate this makes sense because if anyone is simulating a wide range of futures they're going to stop the simulation when it gets boring" "This is what we do in reality. If SpaceX is doing simulations to understand how a rocket works we run all these simulations in the computer" "The simulations that we pay attention to are the ones that are the most interesting" "We could be an alien Netflix series and that series is only going to get continued if our ratings are good" "If you apply Darwin to simulation theory then only the most interesting simulations will continue" "Therefore the most interesting outcome is the most likely because it's either that or annihilation" "So really we have one goal. Keep it interesting."

Brad

143,269 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

🚨 Roman Yampolsky: "We are DEFINITELY living in a simulation - the probability is pretty close to 100%" 😱 AI safety legend Roman Yampolskiy just broke it down: “I know never to say 100% but pretty close to that.” He’s got the paper too “How to Hack the Simulation.” His big question: Can superintelligent agents jailbreak out of their virtual box? Elon Musk’s one question to AGI? “What’s outside the simulation?” What if this whole reality is just a test… and the real challenge is realizing the world isn’t real? Have you ever felt the glitches? Do you think we can actually escape? What would YOU ask once you broke out? Drop your wildest theory below 👇

🚨 Roman Yampolsky: "We are DEFINITELY living in a simulation - the probability is pretty close to 100%" 😱 AI safety legend Roman Yampolskiy just broke it down: “I know never to say 100% but pretty close to that.” He’s got the paper too “How to Hack the Simulation.” His big question: Can superintelligent agents jailbreak out of their virtual box? Elon Musk’s one question to AGI? “What’s outside the simulation?” What if this whole reality is just a test… and the real challenge is realizing the world isn’t real? Have you ever felt the glitches? Do you think we can actually escape? What would YOU ask once you broke out? Drop your wildest theory below 👇

Interstellar

152,955 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Tom Campbell: "The planets and the universe only render themselves when people are looking at them. It's like the video game 'No Man's Sky'. We are living in a simulation." Our reality computes on the fly whatever a player sees. Land on a planet and you get animals, shrubs, lakes and land features. Look away and it is no longer computed. Nothing is saved in memory. Only a set of values that can be regenerated if someone looks again. "It only computed what the person saw. As soon as you looked away, it wasn't computed anymore." "There is no tree. There is no forest. If nobody is there and it is not being observed, it is not being rendered." Stars are just little dots of light. They do not have to come from a sun 20 light years away. When the sun comes up or you go to sleep they stop being rendered for you. We are living in a simulation computed by consciousness.

Tom Campbell: "The planets and the universe only render themselves when people are looking at them. It's like the video game 'No Man's Sky'. We are living in a simulation." Our reality computes on the fly whatever a player sees. Land on a planet and you get animals, shrubs, lakes and land features. Look away and it is no longer computed. Nothing is saved in memory. Only a set of values that can be regenerated if someone looks again. "It only computed what the person saw. As soon as you looked away, it wasn't computed anymore." "There is no tree. There is no forest. If nobody is there and it is not being observed, it is not being rendered." Stars are just little dots of light. They do not have to come from a sun 20 light years away. When the sun comes up or you go to sleep they stop being rendered for you. We are living in a simulation computed by consciousness.

Interstellar

12,367 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Rizwan Virk: "All religions were started by someone looking outside the simulation" He says simulation theory and religion might be describing the same thing all along. Many of the world's religious traditions tell us that the world around us is an illusion created for our benefit. He believes most religions started when somebody peeked outside the simulation and saw what was really there. What if this life is like a video game we're all playing? Does rethinking reality this way change how you see your purpose or your beliefs? What's your take?

Rizwan Virk: "All religions were started by someone looking outside the simulation" He says simulation theory and religion might be describing the same thing all along. Many of the world's religious traditions tell us that the world around us is an illusion created for our benefit. He believes most religions started when somebody peeked outside the simulation and saw what was really there. What if this life is like a video game we're all playing? Does rethinking reality this way change how you see your purpose or your beliefs? What's your take?

Interstellar

11,295 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Elon Musk reveals why he believes the most interesting outcome is always the most likely "If simulation theory is true, it is very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely, because only the simulations that are interesting will continue" "The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting" "In this reality, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations" "When we do millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right. We only care about where it goes wrong" "We keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us" "From a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones" "In order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is you must keep it interesting, or you will be terminated" "Video games have gone from Pong, with two rectangles in a square, to photorealistic with millions of people playing simultaneously, and all of that has occurred in our lifetime" "If that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality. You don't know if what you're seeing is a real video or a fake video" "If we're creating millions, if not billions, of photorealistic simulations of reality, then what are the odds that we're in base reality versus someone else's simulation?" "The most interesting and usually ironic outcome is the most likely. That's a good predictor of the future"

Elon Musk reveals why he believes the most interesting outcome is always the most likely "If simulation theory is true, it is very likely that the most interesting outcome is the most likely, because only the simulations that are interesting will continue" "The simulators will stop any simulations that are boring because they're not interesting" "In this reality, we run simulations all the time. When we try to figure out if the rocket's going to make it, we run thousands, sometimes millions of simulations" "When we do millions of simulations of what can happen with the rocket, we ignore the ones where everything goes right. We only care about where it goes wrong" "We keep the simulations going that are the most interesting to us" "From a Darwinian perspective, the only surviving simulations will be the most interesting ones" "In order to avoid getting turned off, the only rule is you must keep it interesting, or you will be terminated" "Video games have gone from Pong, with two rectangles in a square, to photorealistic with millions of people playing simultaneously, and all of that has occurred in our lifetime" "If that trend continues, video games will be indistinguishable from reality. You don't know if what you're seeing is a real video or a fake video" "If we're creating millions, if not billions, of photorealistic simulations of reality, then what are the odds that we're in base reality versus someone else's simulation?" "The most interesting and usually ironic outcome is the most likely. That's a good predictor of the future"

Jaynit

10,440 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 Billy Carson : "We are living in a Simulation" Quantum physics doesn’t lie. “We’re living in the shadow of a higher dimension.” Scientists created an 8th dimensional quasi-crystal… angled it just right… and it cast a SHADOW SPHERE. That sphere? OUR UNIVERSE. “The angle of a higher multidimensional quasi crystal potentially could be what has created this gigantic sphere we call our universe.” Mind officially blown. Do YOU believe we’re in a simulation? Is this interview on Shawn Ryan Show the proof we’ve been waiting for… or is reality even wilder? Reply with your theory 👇 What if we’re all just NPCs in someone else’s game?

🚨 Billy Carson : "We are living in a Simulation" Quantum physics doesn’t lie. “We’re living in the shadow of a higher dimension.” Scientists created an 8th dimensional quasi-crystal… angled it just right… and it cast a SHADOW SPHERE. That sphere? OUR UNIVERSE. “The angle of a higher multidimensional quasi crystal potentially could be what has created this gigantic sphere we call our universe.” Mind officially blown. Do YOU believe we’re in a simulation? Is this interview on Shawn Ryan Show the proof we’ve been waiting for… or is reality even wilder? Reply with your theory 👇 What if we’re all just NPCs in someone else’s game?

Interstellar

121,082 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...

Are We In a Simulation? Well, it does work as if we are. So for all intents and purposes you should adopt this mentality! Life responds to you, primarily your thoughts, beliefs, energy and actions. Whether or not there's a giant computer doesn't matter; simulation can simply be an allegory for how this reality operates. As such, we can work with this simulation to create the reality that we desire, and improve our lives. Becoming conscious is the goal. Then, work to understand WHY we are in this "simulation", and what our aims should be...

⚡️🌞 Sol Brah 🌞🐬

19,252 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 DeWalt Laser Reveals HIDDEN CODE on Walls Under DMT – Proof We're in a Simulation? 😱 Chase Hughes told Shawn Ryan: "A simple DeWalt laser turns into one of the strangest demonstrations of simulation theory you’ll ever see." "When you look at that, you can see through the wall... You can see through the wall where the laser is." "While you are in the DMT state, you get close to the wall and you can see code that looks kind of like alien writing... or some that look like kanji Japanese characters." "This is permanent solid... if you move your head, the code stays in the same place." "If you put your arm in front of it, the code completely changes, but only right where your arm is." "The first time I saw it, I wept. I wept." Multiple people see the exact same code – no explanation! Mind blown – is reality glitching right in front of us? Have you ever experienced anything like this on psychedelics? Do you think we're living in a simulation with visible code? What would seeing alien-like symbols do to your worldview? Drop your thoughts 👇 #SimulationTheory

🚨 DeWalt Laser Reveals HIDDEN CODE on Walls Under DMT – Proof We're in a Simulation? 😱 Chase Hughes told Shawn Ryan: "A simple DeWalt laser turns into one of the strangest demonstrations of simulation theory you’ll ever see." "When you look at that, you can see through the wall... You can see through the wall where the laser is." "While you are in the DMT state, you get close to the wall and you can see code that looks kind of like alien writing... or some that look like kanji Japanese characters." "This is permanent solid... if you move your head, the code stays in the same place." "If you put your arm in front of it, the code completely changes, but only right where your arm is." "The first time I saw it, I wept. I wept." Multiple people see the exact same code – no explanation! Mind blown – is reality glitching right in front of us? Have you ever experienced anything like this on psychedelics? Do you think we're living in a simulation with visible code? What would seeing alien-like symbols do to your worldview? Drop your thoughts 👇 #SimulationTheory

Interstellar

73,687 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Astronomer Marc D'Antonio: UFO's & Flying Saucers are Particle Accelerators 🛸 "The outer ring of UFO's is an accelerator. Flying Saucers are particle accelerators and they're generating particles that surround the craft and close the loop with gravity." He told AJ from The Why Files - They generate fifth dimensional particles to pull the craft into the 5th dimension. "We could actually get to Alpha Centauri in about 20 minutes using this technology... you just hop into the fifth dimension and pop in." Oscillate in and out fast enough and you can sit on the ocean floor as long as you want with zero pressure. Mind-blowing or sci-fi? Is this the real secret behind UFOs? Could they be hiding in our oceans right now? What’s your theory?

Astronomer Marc D'Antonio: UFO's & Flying Saucers are Particle Accelerators 🛸 "The outer ring of UFO's is an accelerator. Flying Saucers are particle accelerators and they're generating particles that surround the craft and close the loop with gravity." He told AJ from The Why Files - They generate fifth dimensional particles to pull the craft into the 5th dimension. "We could actually get to Alpha Centauri in about 20 minutes using this technology... you just hop into the fifth dimension and pop in." Oscillate in and out fast enough and you can sit on the ocean floor as long as you want with zero pressure. Mind-blowing or sci-fi? Is this the real secret behind UFOs? Could they be hiding in our oceans right now? What’s your theory?

Interstellar

17,802 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 DID CERN JUST BRING A NEW ELEMENT INTO EXISTENCE — AND CHANGE REALITY IN THE PROCESS? Every time CERN smashes particles together, they’re attempting to create elements that don’t naturally exist on Earth, like Moscovium (element 115). One claim circulating is that the moment scientists successfully created a new element in the lab, researchers on the other side of the world “discovered” it at the exact same time. Some interpret this as the element being brought into our universe for the first time. Are they just making new particles… or are they altering what exists in our reality?

🚨 DID CERN JUST BRING A NEW ELEMENT INTO EXISTENCE — AND CHANGE REALITY IN THE PROCESS? Every time CERN smashes particles together, they’re attempting to create elements that don’t naturally exist on Earth, like Moscovium (element 115). One claim circulating is that the moment scientists successfully created a new element in the lab, researchers on the other side of the world “discovered” it at the exact same time. Some interpret this as the element being brought into our universe for the first time. Are they just making new particles… or are they altering what exists in our reality?

HustleBitch

15,915 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat