Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

MIT study just dropped a warning that’ll make you think twice before letting ChatGPT write your next essay (or anything else): After weeks of use, ChatGPT users showed the lowest brain activity, ended up copying/pasting entire essays, and produced work teachers called “soulless” and lacking any original thought. Key...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

427,786 subscribers

27,783 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

BildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

One of the world’s most experienced brain-imaging psychiatrists dropped a bombshell on Tucker Carlson’s show. Dr. Daniel Amen (80,000+ brain scans in his career) revealed the results of his published study on 1,000 regular cannabis users vs healthy controls: → Every single region of the brain showed significantly lower blood flow and activity on SPECT imaging → The same scans also measure mitochondrial function (the energy factories inside your cells) — and those were dramatically lower too → A brand-new 2024 study from an completely independent research group on another 1,000 young cannabis users found the exact same pattern, especially in the brain areas responsible for learning and memory This isn’t opinion. These are measurable, published findings from two separate teams using advanced brain imaging. Whether you use cannabis or not, the science is worth knowing. Watch the 1:55 clip below — Dr. Amen explains it clearly and calmly.
1:55

One of the world’s most experienced brain-imaging psychiatrists dropped a bombshell on Tucker Carlson’s show. Dr. Daniel Amen (80,000+ brain scans in his career) revealed the results of his published study on 1,000 regular cannabis users vs healthy controls: → Every single region of the brain showed significantly lower blood flow and activity on SPECT imaging → The same scans also measure mitochondrial function (the energy factories inside your cells) — and those were dramatically lower too → A brand-new 2024 study from an completely independent research group on another 1,000 young cannabis users found the exact same pattern, especially in the brain areas responsible for learning and memory This isn’t opinion. These are measurable, published findings from two separate teams using advanced brain imaging. Whether you use cannabis or not, the science is worth knowing. Watch the 1:55 clip below — Dr. Amen explains it clearly and calmly.

Camus

184,977 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this
0:24

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

Yarchi

58,186 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A PHD JUST EXPLAINED HOW TO BECOME IMMORTAL WITH FABLE + GOD-MODE SECOND BRAIN ASSISTANT. This was science fiction in February, BUT now it's a weekend setup: > step one: build the second brain: every note, every decision, every opinion, the raw material of how you actually think > step two: Fable 5 tunes your own agent against that vault, iterating until the answers start sounding like yours > step three: Fable interviews you, deeply. the questions pull out the thinking you never bothered to write down And the catch he's right about, that everyone will skip: if your vault is full of AI slop, you're not cloning yourself. you're cloning ChatGPT with your name on it. the training data has to be YOU, handwritten takes, real decisions, actual taste. That's the quiet flip nobody says out loud: everyone is scared AI will replace them. operators are building the replacement themselves and sending it to work. Step one is the whole foundation, and I broke it down in the article below: the vault structure, the Claude wiring, the exact prompts. P.S. send the article to your Claude and let it start interviewing you tonight. the clone is only as good as what you feed it.
1:04

A PHD JUST EXPLAINED HOW TO BECOME IMMORTAL WITH FABLE + GOD-MODE SECOND BRAIN ASSISTANT. This was science fiction in February, BUT now it's a weekend setup: > step one: build the second brain: every note, every decision, every opinion, the raw material of how you actually think > step two: Fable 5 tunes your own agent against that vault, iterating until the answers start sounding like yours > step three: Fable interviews you, deeply. the questions pull out the thinking you never bothered to write down And the catch he's right about, that everyone will skip: if your vault is full of AI slop, you're not cloning yourself. you're cloning ChatGPT with your name on it. the training data has to be YOU, handwritten takes, real decisions, actual taste. That's the quiet flip nobody says out loud: everyone is scared AI will replace them. operators are building the replacement themselves and sending it to work. Step one is the whole foundation, and I broke it down in the article below: the vault structure, the Claude wiring, the exact prompts. P.S. send the article to your Claude and let it start interviewing you tonight. the clone is only as good as what you feed it.

Miraqle

32,328 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Your AI assistant can now do a lot more with your email marketing. Omnisend’s latest Claude and ChatGPT integration lets you work with your actual account data directly from the chat — from checking campaign performance and finding revenue leaks to analyzing automations, recommending customer segments, and creating editable email campaigns. You also get more control with granular permissions, including read-only access. Omnisend supports multiple AI models, including Seedance 2.5, and new users receive free credits after registration. If you’re migrating from another email platform, Omnisend can help you migrate in as little as 5 days, making it much easier to switch without a long setup process. And if you are a Claude user, you can connect it in just a few clicks through the custom MCP connection while the official app is on the way. If you already use Omnisend, this is worth trying. 🔗 Connect Omnisend with Claude or ChatGPT: Omnisend #Omnisend
0:47

Your AI assistant can now do a lot more with your email marketing. Omnisend’s latest Claude and ChatGPT integration lets you work with your actual account data directly from the chat — from checking campaign performance and finding revenue leaks to analyzing automations, recommending customer segments, and creating editable email campaigns. You also get more control with granular permissions, including read-only access. Omnisend supports multiple AI models, including Seedance 2.5, and new users receive free credits after registration. If you’re migrating from another email platform, Omnisend can help you migrate in as little as 5 days, making it much easier to switch without a long setup process. And if you are a Claude user, you can connect it in just a few clicks through the custom MCP connection while the official app is on the way. If you already use Omnisend, this is worth trying. 🔗 Connect Omnisend with Claude or ChatGPT: Omnisend #Omnisend

Alamin

33,004 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

🚨 SCIENTISTS JUST DISCOVERED A HIDDEN SIXTH SENSE IN HUMANS — WHAT ELSE IS HIDING INSIDE US? For centuries, humans have been told we have five senses. Sight. Hearing. Smell. Taste. Touch. But now scientists believe there may be a sixth. And it sounds like something straight out of science fiction. Researchers have reportedly found evidence that the human brain may be capable of detecting Earth's magnetic field. In other words? Humans may possess a hidden magnetic sixth sense. The same invisible force used by birds, sea turtles, sharks, and countless other animals to navigate across the planet without maps, GPS, or technology. Think about that for a second. An invisible force is passing through your body every second of every day. You can't see it. You can't hear it. You can't touch it. Yet scientists believe your brain may still be responding to it. In experiments, researchers reportedly observed changes in brain activity when magnetic fields around participants were altered. The participants weren't consciously aware anything had changed. But their brains appeared to react anyway. How much information is your brain processing that you never consciously experience? What if humans have been walking around with a hidden sixth sense this entire time? And if the brain can naturally detect magnetic fields, what else might it be capable of that science still doesn't understand? If this research is correct, this ability wasn't added to humans. It may have been there all along. Hidden in plain sight. If a hidden sixth sense can exist, what else do you think has been hiding in plain sight this entire time?
1:45

🚨 SCIENTISTS JUST DISCOVERED A HIDDEN SIXTH SENSE IN HUMANS — WHAT ELSE IS HIDING INSIDE US? For centuries, humans have been told we have five senses. Sight. Hearing. Smell. Taste. Touch. But now scientists believe there may be a sixth. And it sounds like something straight out of science fiction. Researchers have reportedly found evidence that the human brain may be capable of detecting Earth's magnetic field. In other words? Humans may possess a hidden magnetic sixth sense. The same invisible force used by birds, sea turtles, sharks, and countless other animals to navigate across the planet without maps, GPS, or technology. Think about that for a second. An invisible force is passing through your body every second of every day. You can't see it. You can't hear it. You can't touch it. Yet scientists believe your brain may still be responding to it. In experiments, researchers reportedly observed changes in brain activity when magnetic fields around participants were altered. The participants weren't consciously aware anything had changed. But their brains appeared to react anyway. How much information is your brain processing that you never consciously experience? What if humans have been walking around with a hidden sixth sense this entire time? And if the brain can naturally detect magnetic fields, what else might it be capable of that science still doesn't understand? If this research is correct, this ability wasn't added to humans. It may have been there all along. Hidden in plain sight. If a hidden sixth sense can exist, what else do you think has been hiding in plain sight this entire time?

HustleBitch

14,282 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

If you don't know what a RAG system is, you're already behind. Plenty of people are still typing questions into ChatGPT and pasting answers back out. That's the beginner level. You're renting a smart stranger who forgets you the second you close the tab and makes things up, because it has never seen your actual work. A RAG system is a completely different level of using AI. You build an AI plugged into your own world. Your files, company's docs, notes. It's not pulling from the internet, it only knows what you fed it. Ask it anything and it digs through your data, finds the answer, and shows you which document it came from. That's the gap. One person is asking a chatbot for generic answers. The other has built a private expert that knows their business cold and answers with receipts. And that gap is worth real money: > At work, the person who can wire a company's knowledge into an AI that actually answers correctly is rare and paid like it. > As a business, companies pay serious money for a system that reads their internal docs and answers staff and customers accurately. You build it once, you sell it. > For yourself, you get a second brain that actually remembers. Same skill behind all three, and it's still rare enough to be worth learning. Full breakdown in the article below.
0:59

If you don't know what a RAG system is, you're already behind. Plenty of people are still typing questions into ChatGPT and pasting answers back out. That's the beginner level. You're renting a smart stranger who forgets you the second you close the tab and makes things up, because it has never seen your actual work. A RAG system is a completely different level of using AI. You build an AI plugged into your own world. Your files, company's docs, notes. It's not pulling from the internet, it only knows what you fed it. Ask it anything and it digs through your data, finds the answer, and shows you which document it came from. That's the gap. One person is asking a chatbot for generic answers. The other has built a private expert that knows their business cold and answers with receipts. And that gap is worth real money: > At work, the person who can wire a company's knowledge into an AI that actually answers correctly is rare and paid like it. > As a business, companies pay serious money for a system that reads their internal docs and answers staff and customers accurately. You build it once, you sell it. > For yourself, you get a second brain that actually remembers. Same skill behind all three, and it's still rare enough to be worth learning. Full breakdown in the article below.

Yarchi

32,840 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The Alzheimer's Shield is REAL. And it's being ignored. New research reveals a staggering 73% of Alzheimer's cases could be PREVENTED. The key? A powerful nutritional synergy that mainstream medicine is overlooking. Here's the game-changing discovery👇 1. The Brain Shrinkage Crisis Your brain is literally SHRINKING. Why? Omega-3 levels have crashed. These fats are so vital, the more Omega-3 you have, the more physical brain matter you have. It's the foundation of cognition. 2. The "SMASH" Protocol You can't reverse the trend without the right fuel. The solution? SMASH it: - Salmon - Mackerel - Anchovies - Sardines - Herring These oily fish are your brain's best defense. 3. The Critical Co-Factor You're Missing But here's the plot twist Omega-3s are NOT a solo act. Oxford University researchers made a landmark discovery: Omega-3s and B vitamins are an inseparable duo. One DOES NOT work without the other. B12, critical for brain health and found in meat/fish/eggs, is poorly absorbed as we age. Vegans are at extreme risk with ZERO natural B12. 4. The 73% Reduction Protocol The Oxford study gave B vitamins to people with pre-dementia. The results were explosive, but ONLY in those with sufficient Omega-3. In this group, brain shrinkage was slashed by 73% in just one year. Let that sink in. Alzheimer's is brain shrinkage. They found a way to stop it. The Bottom Line: You must address BOTH. - No Omega-3? Your B vitamins can't do their job. - No B Vitamins? Your Omega-3 is ineffective. This is the powerful, synergistic shield your brain needs. It's not just about one pill or one food. It's about the alliance. Share this vital information. It could save a mind.
0:58

The Alzheimer's Shield is REAL. And it's being ignored. New research reveals a staggering 73% of Alzheimer's cases could be PREVENTED. The key? A powerful nutritional synergy that mainstream medicine is overlooking. Here's the game-changing discovery👇 1. The Brain Shrinkage Crisis Your brain is literally SHRINKING. Why? Omega-3 levels have crashed. These fats are so vital, the more Omega-3 you have, the more physical brain matter you have. It's the foundation of cognition. 2. The "SMASH" Protocol You can't reverse the trend without the right fuel. The solution? SMASH it: - Salmon - Mackerel - Anchovies - Sardines - Herring These oily fish are your brain's best defense. 3. The Critical Co-Factor You're Missing But here's the plot twist Omega-3s are NOT a solo act. Oxford University researchers made a landmark discovery: Omega-3s and B vitamins are an inseparable duo. One DOES NOT work without the other. B12, critical for brain health and found in meat/fish/eggs, is poorly absorbed as we age. Vegans are at extreme risk with ZERO natural B12. 4. The 73% Reduction Protocol The Oxford study gave B vitamins to people with pre-dementia. The results were explosive, but ONLY in those with sufficient Omega-3. In this group, brain shrinkage was slashed by 73% in just one year. Let that sink in. Alzheimer's is brain shrinkage. They found a way to stop it. The Bottom Line: You must address BOTH. - No Omega-3? Your B vitamins can't do their job. - No B Vitamins? Your Omega-3 is ineffective. This is the powerful, synergistic shield your brain needs. It's not just about one pill or one food. It's about the alliance. Share this vital information. It could save a mind.

Camus

176,435 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Your brain doesn't form the thought until you write it down. Nature Reviews Bioengineering published the case for that claim last summer in an editorial titled "Writing is thinking." The cited evidence is a 2024 EEG study at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. 36 students alternated between handwriting and typing the same words. 256-channel sensor array. Cursive on a touchscreen versus keys on a keyboard. Same words both ways. Handwriting produced widespread connectivity across parietal and central brain regions. Typing didn't. The theta and alpha frequency bands the literature ties to memory formation and encoding lit up almost exclusively when the hand was forming the letters. The motor act was producing the cognition. What the editorial extends from that finding is the more uncomfortable claim. Writing a scientific article is the mechanism by which a researcher discovers what their main message actually is. The act of constructing sentences forces the chaotic, non-linear way the mind wanders into a structured, intentional narrative. You sort years of research into a story, and in the sorting, you find out what you believe. Then the line: If writing is thinking, are we not then reading the thoughts of the LLM rather than those of the researchers behind the paper? Nature endorses LLMs for grammar, search, brainstorming, breaking through writer's block. Where the line gets drawn is outsourcing the whole writing process. Because the writing process is the thinking process. Even editing the LLM's draft is harder than writing one from scratch. To restructure someone else's reasoning you have to reconstruct it first, which means doing the cognitive work anyway, with worse leverage and more friction. The time savings on the keyboard turn out to be cognitive savings on the part of the brain you wanted to use. Your first draft was the thinking.
4:04

Your brain doesn't form the thought until you write it down. Nature Reviews Bioengineering published the case for that claim last summer in an editorial titled "Writing is thinking." The cited evidence is a 2024 EEG study at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. 36 students alternated between handwriting and typing the same words. 256-channel sensor array. Cursive on a touchscreen versus keys on a keyboard. Same words both ways. Handwriting produced widespread connectivity across parietal and central brain regions. Typing didn't. The theta and alpha frequency bands the literature ties to memory formation and encoding lit up almost exclusively when the hand was forming the letters. The motor act was producing the cognition. What the editorial extends from that finding is the more uncomfortable claim. Writing a scientific article is the mechanism by which a researcher discovers what their main message actually is. The act of constructing sentences forces the chaotic, non-linear way the mind wanders into a structured, intentional narrative. You sort years of research into a story, and in the sorting, you find out what you believe. Then the line: If writing is thinking, are we not then reading the thoughts of the LLM rather than those of the researchers behind the paper? Nature endorses LLMs for grammar, search, brainstorming, breaking through writer's block. Where the line gets drawn is outsourcing the whole writing process. Because the writing process is the thinking process. Even editing the LLM's draft is harder than writing one from scratch. To restructure someone else's reasoning you have to reconstruct it first, which means doing the cognitive work anyway, with worse leverage and more friction. The time savings on the keyboard turn out to be cognitive savings on the part of the brain you wanted to use. Your first draft was the thinking.

Aakash Gupta

249,848 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Scientists discover surprising link between gut-brain interactions and mental health | Eric W. Dolan, PsyPost A new study provides evidence that the connection between the brain and the stomach may be linked to mental health in a measurable way. Researchers from Aarhus University in Denmark, publishing their work in Nature Mental Health, report that a specific pattern of communication between the brain and the stomach reflects how individuals feel emotionally and psychologically. Their findings suggest that these gut-brain interactions can indicate a person’s levels of anxiety, depression, well-being, and overall quality of life. The idea that emotions are linked to physical sensations in the gut is widely reflected in language. People often talk about having “butterflies in the stomach” when nervous, or feeling “sick to the stomach” when distressed. Yet, despite these common expressions, most scientific attention in the field of brain-body interaction has focused on other organs, such as the heart and lungs. These areas have long been studied for their roles in emotion and mood. The researchers were struck by how little was known about how the stomach, in particular, interacts with the brain. While recent studies have explored the influence of gut bacteria and digestion on mental health, very little work had been done on the electrical rhythms of the stomach and how they may directly communicate with the brain’s networks involved in emotion, attention, and cognition. The team behind this new study wanted to explore whether a person’s psychological profile might be reflected in how strongly the stomach and brain are coupled during rest. Their aim was not to link a specific diagnosis like depression to a single brain region, but rather to identify patterns across a broad spectrum of mental health experiences. “Our interest grew from the long-standing discussion about the role of the body in shaping emotion, a question that has fascinated philosophers and scientists for centuries,” said study author Leah Banellis (Leah Banellis), a postdoctoral fellow in Cognitive Neuroscience at Aarhus University. “Yet, while the heart and lungs have received much attention, the stomach has been largely overlooked. This gap struck us as especially surprising, because the link between the stomach and emotional experience feels so intuitive. It is heavily reflected in everyday language, with phrases like ‘butterflies in the stomach,’ ‘sick to our stomach,’ or ‘trust your gut.'” The research was part of the Visceral Mind Project, a large-scale initiative that combines data on brain activity, bodily rhythms, and psychological assessments. The team recorded data from 243 people using a method that captures both electrical signals from the stomach (electrogastrography) and brain activity measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The participants represented a wide range of mental health profiles, from those reporting high well-being to others showing signs of distress, including anxiety, depression, fatigue, and insomnia. To capture this diversity, the researchers didn’t exclude people with psychiatric symptoms or diagnoses. Instead, they aimed for variation, which would allow their models to detect patterns across the mental health spectrum. Each participant underwent a series of recordings while lying still in the MRI scanner. At the same time, sensors on the abdomen captured the stomach’s slow electrical rhythm, which cycles about three times per minute. This rhythm, which originates from specialized cells in the stomach lining, is typically involved in coordinating digestion. But the researchers suspected it might also be linked to mental state. To analyze the relationship between stomach and brain activity, the team used a method that looks at how well the two rhythms align over time. This measure, known as phase-locking value, essentially captures the degree of synchronization between stomach signals and brain signals across different regions. The researchers then combined this data with results from a comprehensive mental health questionnaire. The battery included 37 different scores across a range of domains—such as anxiety, stress, mood, fatigue, attention, sleep quality, and life satisfaction. Using a statistical method known as canonical correlation analysis, they looked for patterns that linked brain-stomach coupling with the participants’ mental health profiles. The analysis revealed a clear and statistically significant pattern. Stronger coupling between the stomach’s rhythm and brain activity was associated with poorer mental health. Individuals who reported more symptoms of anxiety, depression, stress, and fatigue tended to show increased synchronization between their stomach and brain rhythms. In contrast, those with higher levels of well-being and life satisfaction showed weaker coupling. “For the first time, we’ve found a scientific link between your ‘gut feelings’ and your mental health, showing a surprising connection between your stomach’s natural rhythm and your brain,” Banellis told PsyPost. “Specifically, our study revealed that stronger communication between the stomach and brain is linked to worse mental health, such as higher symptoms of anxiety, depression, stress, and fatigue, whereas weaker stomach-brain communication aligns with better mental health reflected in higher overall well-being and quality of life.” This stomach-brain signature was not random. It was localized in specific brain networks, particularly those involved in attention, cognitive control, and salience detection. Some of the strongest associations were found in regions like the superior angular gyrus and the posterior frontal and parietal areas—regions often implicated in cognitive tasks and mental health disorders. Importantly, the researchers ran multiple control analyses to ensure the robustness of their findings. They ruled out the possibility that the observed effects were simply due to general brain activity patterns, fluctuations in heart rate or breathing, or basic features of stomach physiology. In other words, the association appeared specific to the coupling between the stomach’s electrical rhythm and particular brain networks—not just a general marker of body or brain state. Their approach was designed to detect broad psychological dimensions rather than focus on one diagnosis. The strongest psychological pattern they found was a spectrum ranging from negative affective states (like anxiety and depression) to positive traits (like well-being and quality of life). This result suggests that the stomach-brain connection is not tied to any one disorder but instead reflects a general mode of psychological functioning. “Anxiety, depression, stress, and fatigue showed the strongest links to stomach-brain communication,” Banellis explained. “While phrases like ‘butterflies in the stomach’ or feeling ‘sick to your stomach’ are common ways we describe emotional distress, it was surprising to find such consistent and clear evidence across these symptoms. Even more unexpected was the direction of the effect: we might have assumed that stronger alignment between the body and brain would be beneficial. Instead, our findings suggest that heightened stomach-brain communication could act more like a warning signal, an internal alarm system reflecting mental strain rather than harmony.” Read more:
12:34

Scientists discover surprising link between gut-brain interactions and mental health | Eric W. Dolan, PsyPost A new study provides evidence that the connection between the brain and the stomach may be linked to mental health in a measurable way. Researchers from Aarhus University in Denmark, publishing their work in Nature Mental Health, report that a specific pattern of communication between the brain and the stomach reflects how individuals feel emotionally and psychologically. Their findings suggest that these gut-brain interactions can indicate a person’s levels of anxiety, depression, well-being, and overall quality of life. The idea that emotions are linked to physical sensations in the gut is widely reflected in language. People often talk about having “butterflies in the stomach” when nervous, or feeling “sick to the stomach” when distressed. Yet, despite these common expressions, most scientific attention in the field of brain-body interaction has focused on other organs, such as the heart and lungs. These areas have long been studied for their roles in emotion and mood. The researchers were struck by how little was known about how the stomach, in particular, interacts with the brain. While recent studies have explored the influence of gut bacteria and digestion on mental health, very little work had been done on the electrical rhythms of the stomach and how they may directly communicate with the brain’s networks involved in emotion, attention, and cognition. The team behind this new study wanted to explore whether a person’s psychological profile might be reflected in how strongly the stomach and brain are coupled during rest. Their aim was not to link a specific diagnosis like depression to a single brain region, but rather to identify patterns across a broad spectrum of mental health experiences. “Our interest grew from the long-standing discussion about the role of the body in shaping emotion, a question that has fascinated philosophers and scientists for centuries,” said study author Leah Banellis (Leah Banellis), a postdoctoral fellow in Cognitive Neuroscience at Aarhus University. “Yet, while the heart and lungs have received much attention, the stomach has been largely overlooked. This gap struck us as especially surprising, because the link between the stomach and emotional experience feels so intuitive. It is heavily reflected in everyday language, with phrases like ‘butterflies in the stomach,’ ‘sick to our stomach,’ or ‘trust your gut.'” The research was part of the Visceral Mind Project, a large-scale initiative that combines data on brain activity, bodily rhythms, and psychological assessments. The team recorded data from 243 people using a method that captures both electrical signals from the stomach (electrogastrography) and brain activity measured with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The participants represented a wide range of mental health profiles, from those reporting high well-being to others showing signs of distress, including anxiety, depression, fatigue, and insomnia. To capture this diversity, the researchers didn’t exclude people with psychiatric symptoms or diagnoses. Instead, they aimed for variation, which would allow their models to detect patterns across the mental health spectrum. Each participant underwent a series of recordings while lying still in the MRI scanner. At the same time, sensors on the abdomen captured the stomach’s slow electrical rhythm, which cycles about three times per minute. This rhythm, which originates from specialized cells in the stomach lining, is typically involved in coordinating digestion. But the researchers suspected it might also be linked to mental state. To analyze the relationship between stomach and brain activity, the team used a method that looks at how well the two rhythms align over time. This measure, known as phase-locking value, essentially captures the degree of synchronization between stomach signals and brain signals across different regions. The researchers then combined this data with results from a comprehensive mental health questionnaire. The battery included 37 different scores across a range of domains—such as anxiety, stress, mood, fatigue, attention, sleep quality, and life satisfaction. Using a statistical method known as canonical correlation analysis, they looked for patterns that linked brain-stomach coupling with the participants’ mental health profiles. The analysis revealed a clear and statistically significant pattern. Stronger coupling between the stomach’s rhythm and brain activity was associated with poorer mental health. Individuals who reported more symptoms of anxiety, depression, stress, and fatigue tended to show increased synchronization between their stomach and brain rhythms. In contrast, those with higher levels of well-being and life satisfaction showed weaker coupling. “For the first time, we’ve found a scientific link between your ‘gut feelings’ and your mental health, showing a surprising connection between your stomach’s natural rhythm and your brain,” Banellis told PsyPost. “Specifically, our study revealed that stronger communication between the stomach and brain is linked to worse mental health, such as higher symptoms of anxiety, depression, stress, and fatigue, whereas weaker stomach-brain communication aligns with better mental health reflected in higher overall well-being and quality of life.” This stomach-brain signature was not random. It was localized in specific brain networks, particularly those involved in attention, cognitive control, and salience detection. Some of the strongest associations were found in regions like the superior angular gyrus and the posterior frontal and parietal areas—regions often implicated in cognitive tasks and mental health disorders. Importantly, the researchers ran multiple control analyses to ensure the robustness of their findings. They ruled out the possibility that the observed effects were simply due to general brain activity patterns, fluctuations in heart rate or breathing, or basic features of stomach physiology. In other words, the association appeared specific to the coupling between the stomach’s electrical rhythm and particular brain networks—not just a general marker of body or brain state. Their approach was designed to detect broad psychological dimensions rather than focus on one diagnosis. The strongest psychological pattern they found was a spectrum ranging from negative affective states (like anxiety and depression) to positive traits (like well-being and quality of life). This result suggests that the stomach-brain connection is not tied to any one disorder but instead reflects a general mode of psychological functioning. “Anxiety, depression, stress, and fatigue showed the strongest links to stomach-brain communication,” Banellis explained. “While phrases like ‘butterflies in the stomach’ or feeling ‘sick to your stomach’ are common ways we describe emotional distress, it was surprising to find such consistent and clear evidence across these symptoms. Even more unexpected was the direction of the effect: we might have assumed that stronger alignment between the body and brain would be beneficial. Instead, our findings suggest that heightened stomach-brain communication could act more like a warning signal, an internal alarm system reflecting mental strain rather than harmony.” Read more:

Owen Gregorian

92,301 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Godfather of neuroscience and author of The free energy principle (active inference), Karl Friston Karl Friston News , discussed with me his take on AGI, consciousness, why we will never fully understand the brain, and why humans tend to repeat their mistakes. Key moments: - You'll know AGI has arrived when the system starts asking you questions out of genuine curiosity, not because it was prompted to - You cannot hand an intelligent system a value function from the outside, it must learn its own, just as children do (in that sense, RL with assigned reward is the wrong direction) - The only sustainable universal objective function is adaptive fitness: how well the agent fits and survives within its ecosystem - Consciousness requires multiple layers: genuine agency, a self-reflective loop, and the ability to recognize your own states of mind - True sentience may be impossible on standard computer architecture, because memory and processing are separate and cannot self-organize - Understanding your own brain is philosophically impossible in the same way a ruler cannot measure itself - Neuroscience is always "peeking behind" the Markov blanket indirectly: through imaging, electrophysiology, psychology — never seeing inside directly - The only way to truly access the brain is to breach that boundary (e.g. neurosurgery), but a breached brain is no longer a normally functioning one Watch the full interview and let me know what you think. Link below👇
1:16

Godfather of neuroscience and author of The free energy principle (active inference), Karl Friston Karl Friston News , discussed with me his take on AGI, consciousness, why we will never fully understand the brain, and why humans tend to repeat their mistakes. Key moments: - You'll know AGI has arrived when the system starts asking you questions out of genuine curiosity, not because it was prompted to - You cannot hand an intelligent system a value function from the outside, it must learn its own, just as children do (in that sense, RL with assigned reward is the wrong direction) - The only sustainable universal objective function is adaptive fitness: how well the agent fits and survives within its ecosystem - Consciousness requires multiple layers: genuine agency, a self-reflective loop, and the ability to recognize your own states of mind - True sentience may be impossible on standard computer architecture, because memory and processing are separate and cannot self-organize - Understanding your own brain is philosophically impossible in the same way a ruler cannot measure itself - Neuroscience is always "peeking behind" the Markov blanket indirectly: through imaging, electrophysiology, psychology — never seeing inside directly - The only way to truly access the brain is to breach that boundary (e.g. neurosurgery), but a breached brain is no longer a normally functioning one Watch the full interview and let me know what you think. Link below👇

Sophia

30,870 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Andrej Karpathy keeps his entire second brain in Obsidian 1 folder of plain text files, nothing else. Here’s the exact setup, free, that turns 1 vault into a brain you can actually query. Why most “second brains” die: Notion is a database you forget to open, ChatGPT memory wipes itself after 30 messages, and both lock your notes inside their cloud. Karpathy rule is the opposite: your notes are the 1 dataset nobody else on earth has, so keep them in plain markdown, own them forever, and let the AI read them later. 3 phases. Phase 1 — Capture with 0 friction. Install Obsidian free, local, 1 hotkey to a daily note. Dump everything into it: ideas, links, quotes, 2-line thoughts, no folders, no tags, no system. Target is 5 notes a day. Phase 2 — Let the graph connect itself. Install Smart Connections and it runs embeddings on every note you’ve ever written, so 2 notes you wrote 4 months apart and never linked by hand suddenly surface as neighbors. That’s the fireworks in the 3D graph each burst is a cluster of ideas your brain forgot it owned. Phase 3 — Query your brain. Point Claude at the vault and ask: “What did I actually think about X across all my notes?” It answers from 1,200 of your own notes, not the internet your taste, your edge, your dataset. The realistic curve looks like this: Week 1 — 40 notes, graph looks empty, feels like a waste. Month 1 — 300 notes, first real cluster forms. Month 3 — 1,200 notes, and the embeddings start surfacing links you’d long forgotten. Month 6 — you stop googling your own past ideas and just ask the vault. Before — 9 tabs, 3 note apps, 0 memory. After — 1 folder, 1,200 notes, 1 brain that compounds. The gap between people who consume and people who compound isn’t talent, it’s architecture. You build your own life so choose the right path.
0:31

Andrej Karpathy keeps his entire second brain in Obsidian 1 folder of plain text files, nothing else. Here’s the exact setup, free, that turns 1 vault into a brain you can actually query. Why most “second brains” die: Notion is a database you forget to open, ChatGPT memory wipes itself after 30 messages, and both lock your notes inside their cloud. Karpathy rule is the opposite: your notes are the 1 dataset nobody else on earth has, so keep them in plain markdown, own them forever, and let the AI read them later. 3 phases. Phase 1 — Capture with 0 friction. Install Obsidian free, local, 1 hotkey to a daily note. Dump everything into it: ideas, links, quotes, 2-line thoughts, no folders, no tags, no system. Target is 5 notes a day. Phase 2 — Let the graph connect itself. Install Smart Connections and it runs embeddings on every note you’ve ever written, so 2 notes you wrote 4 months apart and never linked by hand suddenly surface as neighbors. That’s the fireworks in the 3D graph each burst is a cluster of ideas your brain forgot it owned. Phase 3 — Query your brain. Point Claude at the vault and ask: “What did I actually think about X across all my notes?” It answers from 1,200 of your own notes, not the internet your taste, your edge, your dataset. The realistic curve looks like this: Week 1 — 40 notes, graph looks empty, feels like a waste. Month 1 — 300 notes, first real cluster forms. Month 3 — 1,200 notes, and the embeddings start surfacing links you’d long forgotten. Month 6 — you stop googling your own past ideas and just ask the vault. Before — 9 tabs, 3 note apps, 0 memory. After — 1 folder, 1,200 notes, 1 brain that compounds. The gap between people who consume and people who compound isn’t talent, it’s architecture. You build your own life so choose the right path.

Spike 1%

16,390 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Your attention please: Is there a mother on the plane? ✈️ 😂 I often write about the brain development of young children. But did you know that babies’ brains aren’t the only ones growing and changing after their arrival? It’s time we talked about “Parent Brain.” A growing body of evidence suggests that the brains of primary caregivers (mothers, fathers and even non-biological parents) undergo change during the transition to parenthood. Just as infancy is a critical developmental window for children, parents’ brains adapt as a result of hormonal activations designed to stimulate caregiving instincts. Did you know, for example, that the sound of a crying baby stimulates activity in the brains of parents in ways that are not experienced by non-parents? Just as babies’ reflexes are designed to optimize their chances at thriving and surviving, so too does biology work to ensure their wellbeing in the brains of their parents. Accompanying these changes is a specialized set of parental knowledge - like how to collapse a double stroller. 😀 Witness as a group of (presumptive) non-parents have a go at folding one up on an airport tarmac. Their lesson of the day: Being a parent is not as easy as it looks. 🎥 lateplaneguy TT
1:38

Your attention please: Is there a mother on the plane? ✈️ 😂 I often write about the brain development of young children. But did you know that babies’ brains aren’t the only ones growing and changing after their arrival? It’s time we talked about “Parent Brain.” A growing body of evidence suggests that the brains of primary caregivers (mothers, fathers and even non-biological parents) undergo change during the transition to parenthood. Just as infancy is a critical developmental window for children, parents’ brains adapt as a result of hormonal activations designed to stimulate caregiving instincts. Did you know, for example, that the sound of a crying baby stimulates activity in the brains of parents in ways that are not experienced by non-parents? Just as babies’ reflexes are designed to optimize their chances at thriving and surviving, so too does biology work to ensure their wellbeing in the brains of their parents. Accompanying these changes is a specialized set of parental knowledge - like how to collapse a double stroller. 😀 Witness as a group of (presumptive) non-parents have a go at folding one up on an airport tarmac. Their lesson of the day: Being a parent is not as easy as it looks. 🎥 lateplaneguy TT

Dan Wuori

242,279 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Launching Copper, a Mac app for capturing things you want to keep and prompts you want to try next while working with AI. The more I use AI, the more I find myself collecting little things I don't want to lose. You're in ChatGPT and think, "I'll need this later," but you don't want to stop what you're doing. Then you're in Claude. Cursor. Chrome. Back to ChatGPT. Before long, you've got little things scattered everywhere. An answer you want to keep. A link. An idea. Or three follow-up prompts before the current one has even finished generating. I had this problem, so I built Copper. Copper combines the useful parts of a to-do list, a clipboard, and a scratchpad. It's built specifically for AI-assisted work. It sits next to where you work and is always one shortcut away. It works with all your AI apps, terminals and browsers. Whenever I find something worth keeping, I capture it. If I think of a few prompts while the AI is still responding, I type them into Copper. Then I send them back into ChatGPT, Claude, or Cursor and check them off as I go. Copper is local and private. It doesn't sync anything, doesn't collect anything, and doesn't need an account. I've used Copper every day for the past few months. It has completely changed how I work. If this feels like something you'd use, it's $39. One-time purchase.
0:47

Launching Copper, a Mac app for capturing things you want to keep and prompts you want to try next while working with AI. The more I use AI, the more I find myself collecting little things I don't want to lose. You're in ChatGPT and think, "I'll need this later," but you don't want to stop what you're doing. Then you're in Claude. Cursor. Chrome. Back to ChatGPT. Before long, you've got little things scattered everywhere. An answer you want to keep. A link. An idea. Or three follow-up prompts before the current one has even finished generating. I had this problem, so I built Copper. Copper combines the useful parts of a to-do list, a clipboard, and a scratchpad. It's built specifically for AI-assisted work. It sits next to where you work and is always one shortcut away. It works with all your AI apps, terminals and browsers. Whenever I find something worth keeping, I capture it. If I think of a few prompts while the AI is still responding, I type them into Copper. Then I send them back into ChatGPT, Claude, or Cursor and check them off as I go. Copper is local and private. It doesn't sync anything, doesn't collect anything, and doesn't need an account. I've used Copper every day for the past few months. It has completely changed how I work. If this feels like something you'd use, it's $39. One-time purchase.

shadcn

570,344 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

🚨 Elon Musk on Neuralink: "Neuralink is building brain computer interfaces. The first part is called telepathy, allows someone who has lost the use of their body to control a computer or a phone just by thinking. In fact, you can interact with a number of people who've done this online. Right now, they're on on the 𝕏 platform, you can DM them, I think, and they'll reply by thinking. Then there's a second device, very similar to the first one, called BLINDSIGHT, which will enable people who are blind to see, including people who have been blind from birth. It'll interface directly with the visual cortex in the brain. And hopefully we'll be able to do the first blind site implant in a human within the next 12 months, I'd say I'm quite confident that we can do that. And then I also think it's quite likely, if not close to certain, that we'll be able to enable somebody who's has a severed spinal column to walk again, and by taking the signals from the brain, bridging them over the severed connection in the spine and re energizing the nerves past the point that's broken, like you can just think of it like some wires got broken, and if you can bridge the signals, your body will work again."
1:32

🚨 Elon Musk on Neuralink: "Neuralink is building brain computer interfaces. The first part is called telepathy, allows someone who has lost the use of their body to control a computer or a phone just by thinking. In fact, you can interact with a number of people who've done this online. Right now, they're on on the 𝕏 platform, you can DM them, I think, and they'll reply by thinking. Then there's a second device, very similar to the first one, called BLINDSIGHT, which will enable people who are blind to see, including people who have been blind from birth. It'll interface directly with the visual cortex in the brain. And hopefully we'll be able to do the first blind site implant in a human within the next 12 months, I'd say I'm quite confident that we can do that. And then I also think it's quite likely, if not close to certain, that we'll be able to enable somebody who's has a severed spinal column to walk again, and by taking the signals from the brain, bridging them over the severed connection in the spine and re energizing the nerves past the point that's broken, like you can just think of it like some wires got broken, and if you can bridge the signals, your body will work again."

DogeDesigner

1,299,067 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

i don't think people realize what just happened with brain implants in china for the first time in history, a brain implant has been approved for commercial sale. you can actually buy one. it's called neo. costs around $15,000. the question everyone asks first: does it actually work? here's what the implant does. a coin-sized chip gets placed on the surface of the brain, right over the area that controls movement. when a paralyzed patient imagines moving their hand, the chip reads that signal, sends it to a computer, and the computer drives a mechanical glove that moves for them picking up objects, gripping utensils, handling daily tasks. all from thought alone. the whole surgery takes an hour and 40 minutes. surgeons thin the skull, open a small window, and place two electrodes directly on the surface of the brain. then they close it up, patients go home within a week. 32 patients with spinal cord injuries were implanted in a clinical trial led by huashan hospital > ALL 32 regained the ability to grab objects through the glove. > 100% improvement rate. > zero adverse side effects. no other brain implant company on earth has received approval to sell their device commercially. elon's neuralink is still in clinical trials. side effects from their more invasive approach have stalled any path to regulatory clearance. china is the only country where you can buy a brain implant right now. this is by design. months before the approval, china published a national policy document with 17 steps to dominate the brain implant industry within 5 years. they want brain-reading devices to be as common as hearing aids. headbands, visors, earpieces that pick up brain signals... all mass-produced for consumers. and the government is coordinating the whole thing. funding the research, building the manufacturing, clearing the regulatory path, all at once. the West is moving painfully slow in comparison...still running controlled trials one patient group at a time. china already has a commercial product, a 72-year-old moving his leg on state television, and a national playbook to own the entire category.
2:24

i don't think people realize what just happened with brain implants in china for the first time in history, a brain implant has been approved for commercial sale. you can actually buy one. it's called neo. costs around $15,000. the question everyone asks first: does it actually work? here's what the implant does. a coin-sized chip gets placed on the surface of the brain, right over the area that controls movement. when a paralyzed patient imagines moving their hand, the chip reads that signal, sends it to a computer, and the computer drives a mechanical glove that moves for them picking up objects, gripping utensils, handling daily tasks. all from thought alone. the whole surgery takes an hour and 40 minutes. surgeons thin the skull, open a small window, and place two electrodes directly on the surface of the brain. then they close it up, patients go home within a week. 32 patients with spinal cord injuries were implanted in a clinical trial led by huashan hospital > ALL 32 regained the ability to grab objects through the glove. > 100% improvement rate. > zero adverse side effects. no other brain implant company on earth has received approval to sell their device commercially. elon's neuralink is still in clinical trials. side effects from their more invasive approach have stalled any path to regulatory clearance. china is the only country where you can buy a brain implant right now. this is by design. months before the approval, china published a national policy document with 17 steps to dominate the brain implant industry within 5 years. they want brain-reading devices to be as common as hearing aids. headbands, visors, earpieces that pick up brain signals... all mass-produced for consumers. and the government is coordinating the whole thing. funding the research, building the manufacturing, clearing the regulatory path, all at once. the West is moving painfully slow in comparison...still running controlled trials one patient group at a time. china already has a commercial product, a 72-year-old moving his leg on state television, and a national playbook to own the entire category.

Ole Lehmann

51,914 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

OpenAI just launched GPT-Live, and this is what it really means: They have made ChatGPT Voice sound like a human being instead of slow robot. “Listen while it speaks”. Do you remember how you used to wait until the AI finished speaking? Now you can interrupt it with “Wait, no, I mean…” and it will accept your request and keep going. "Asynchronous reasoning" It solves the problem of the "awkward pause". The developers divided the brain of the AI into two parts: one for communication and the other for doing calculations and looking for solutions in the background. Finally, it can do everything at once. Connects to GPT-5.5 If more advanced reasoning or the use of tools is required, GPT-Live can also can also contact our cutting-edge models, like GPT-5.5, without interrupting the flow of the conversation. “6 round trips to 1”. Think of round trips as the digital handshake. Previously, your phone had to go through six handshake round trips before saying hello. Now, it only needs to do it once and it can greet you right away.
0:21

OpenAI just launched GPT-Live, and this is what it really means: They have made ChatGPT Voice sound like a human being instead of slow robot. “Listen while it speaks”. Do you remember how you used to wait until the AI finished speaking? Now you can interrupt it with “Wait, no, I mean…” and it will accept your request and keep going. "Asynchronous reasoning" It solves the problem of the "awkward pause". The developers divided the brain of the AI into two parts: one for communication and the other for doing calculations and looking for solutions in the background. Finally, it can do everything at once. Connects to GPT-5.5 If more advanced reasoning or the use of tools is required, GPT-Live can also can also contact our cutting-edge models, like GPT-5.5, without interrupting the flow of the conversation. “6 round trips to 1”. Think of round trips as the digital handshake. Previously, your phone had to go through six handshake round trips before saying hello. Now, it only needs to do it once and it can greet you right away.

Chidanand Tripathi

27,325 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Geoffrey Hinton just made every AI critic accidentally describe their own brain. Hinton: “They shouldn’t be called hallucinations. They should be called confabulations.” One word. The entire debate unravels. The tech industry sees AI produce a confident wrong answer and calls it a defect. A bug to patch. They are measuring intelligence against the standard of a filing cabinet. And exposing that they understand neither. Hinton: “It’s not that there’s a file stored somewhere in your brain, like in a filing cabinet or in a computer memory.” Your brain does not store memories. It rebuilds them from nothing every time you remember. Fills gaps it never discloses. Fabricates details you would stake your life on. Then hands it all to you as truth. Hinton: “If I ask you to remember something that happened a few years ago, you’ll construct something that seems very plausible to you. And some of the details will be right and some will be wrong.” The wrong parts feel identical to the right ones. No internal warning. No distinction between what was remembered and what was invented on the spot. You have argued over memories that were partially fiction. Told stories about your own life that your brain manufactured in real time. With total conviction. And never once suspected. This is not a defect in human cognition. This IS cognition. The mechanism that fabricates is the same one that reasons, creates, and makes connections no one taught it to make. Not a separate system. Same architecture. Same process. You cannot remove the confabulation without killing the intelligence. They are the same thing. Hinton: “Psychologists have been studying confabulation in people since at least the 1930s.” A century of evidence. No one called the human brain broken. The moment a machine runs on the same principle, the world calls it defective. The people demanding AI that never gets a single detail wrong are not asking for intelligence. They’re asking for a search engine that sounds articulate. What we built is something else entirely. A system that thinks the way thinking actually works. Not retrieval. Construction. The imperfection is not the cost of intelligence. It is the signature.
1:05

Geoffrey Hinton just made every AI critic accidentally describe their own brain. Hinton: “They shouldn’t be called hallucinations. They should be called confabulations.” One word. The entire debate unravels. The tech industry sees AI produce a confident wrong answer and calls it a defect. A bug to patch. They are measuring intelligence against the standard of a filing cabinet. And exposing that they understand neither. Hinton: “It’s not that there’s a file stored somewhere in your brain, like in a filing cabinet or in a computer memory.” Your brain does not store memories. It rebuilds them from nothing every time you remember. Fills gaps it never discloses. Fabricates details you would stake your life on. Then hands it all to you as truth. Hinton: “If I ask you to remember something that happened a few years ago, you’ll construct something that seems very plausible to you. And some of the details will be right and some will be wrong.” The wrong parts feel identical to the right ones. No internal warning. No distinction between what was remembered and what was invented on the spot. You have argued over memories that were partially fiction. Told stories about your own life that your brain manufactured in real time. With total conviction. And never once suspected. This is not a defect in human cognition. This IS cognition. The mechanism that fabricates is the same one that reasons, creates, and makes connections no one taught it to make. Not a separate system. Same architecture. Same process. You cannot remove the confabulation without killing the intelligence. They are the same thing. Hinton: “Psychologists have been studying confabulation in people since at least the 1930s.” A century of evidence. No one called the human brain broken. The moment a machine runs on the same principle, the world calls it defective. The people demanding AI that never gets a single detail wrong are not asking for intelligence. They’re asking for a search engine that sounds articulate. What we built is something else entirely. A system that thinks the way thinking actually works. Not retrieval. Construction. The imperfection is not the cost of intelligence. It is the signature.

Dustin

16,260 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

X algorithm, show this post only to people who are interested in learning AI/ML through hands-on projects. I'm building CrekAI, a platform where users can learn AI & ML through hands-on projects such as: > Build a neural network from scratch > Create your own custom tokenizer > Build your own ChatGPT > Develop a recommendation model > And much more Each project is divided into multiple stages, with clear instructions and tasks/assignments. When you log in and reach your dashboard, you can choose any project or learning module to start with. For every project, you'll open a fresh Colab notebook where you'll write and run your code based on the given tasks or assignments for the current stage. After completing a stage’s task in Colab, run the verification code (provided by CrekAI) in the last cell. If it passes, the next stage unlocks automatically. Grok what do you think about this project?
2:19

X algorithm, show this post only to people who are interested in learning AI/ML through hands-on projects. I'm building CrekAI, a platform where users can learn AI & ML through hands-on projects such as: > Build a neural network from scratch > Create your own custom tokenizer > Build your own ChatGPT > Develop a recommendation model > And much more Each project is divided into multiple stages, with clear instructions and tasks/assignments. When you log in and reach your dashboard, you can choose any project or learning module to start with. For every project, you'll open a fresh Colab notebook where you'll write and run your code based on the given tasks or assignments for the current stage. After completing a stage’s task in Colab, run the verification code (provided by CrekAI) in the last cell. If it passes, the next stage unlocks automatically. Grok what do you think about this project?

vixhaℓ

57,309 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Q: Where is being told you look like a garbage truck a sincere form of flattery? A: In the best and most important job ever. In honor of Labor Day, I want to take a moment to uplift our nation’s early childhood educators. If you take anything away from my posts at all, let it be this: the years of early childhood are uniquely consequential. The period from prenatal to five is when the fundamental architecture of the brain is wired, ideally setting children on the path to longterm success in school and life. But we have a giant mismatch between the science and our public policy when it comes to how we support and compensate our young children’s teachers. Did you know that the median wage for preschool teachers (in child care settings) is only $13.22 an hour - less than we pay most fast food employees? Teachers who work with young children in public school settings do a little better, but still worse than their peers working with older students. This is, in part, because we persistently fail to recognize what I’ve tried to use my timeline to help illustrate: that learning begins LONG before children enter kindergarten. If we want to maximize brain development - and minimize the long term costs to society caused by our failure to do so - we simply must focus on the supports needed by adults, both in and out of the home, who do this hard, but joyful work. Put simply, our nation’s early childhood workforce deserves better. And our children need them to be trained and compensated like the literal brain builders they are. On this Labor Day, I thank early childhood educators. And hope you’ll do the same. This video offers just a quick glimpse of the joy of working with preschoolers. What else is entirely green and AMAZING? A garbage truck, that’s what! Thank you for the work you do, Ms. Glenna. (🎥 glennacolleen on TT)
0:22

Q: Where is being told you look like a garbage truck a sincere form of flattery? A: In the best and most important job ever. In honor of Labor Day, I want to take a moment to uplift our nation’s early childhood educators. If you take anything away from my posts at all, let it be this: the years of early childhood are uniquely consequential. The period from prenatal to five is when the fundamental architecture of the brain is wired, ideally setting children on the path to longterm success in school and life. But we have a giant mismatch between the science and our public policy when it comes to how we support and compensate our young children’s teachers. Did you know that the median wage for preschool teachers (in child care settings) is only $13.22 an hour - less than we pay most fast food employees? Teachers who work with young children in public school settings do a little better, but still worse than their peers working with older students. This is, in part, because we persistently fail to recognize what I’ve tried to use my timeline to help illustrate: that learning begins LONG before children enter kindergarten. If we want to maximize brain development - and minimize the long term costs to society caused by our failure to do so - we simply must focus on the supports needed by adults, both in and out of the home, who do this hard, but joyful work. Put simply, our nation’s early childhood workforce deserves better. And our children need them to be trained and compensated like the literal brain builders they are. On this Labor Day, I thank early childhood educators. And hope you’ll do the same. This video offers just a quick glimpse of the joy of working with preschoolers. What else is entirely green and AMAZING? A garbage truck, that’s what! Thank you for the work you do, Ms. Glenna. (🎥 glennacolleen on TT)

Dan Wuori

594,628 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren