Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

More wrong doings to cover up another wrong doing? This seems exactly what happened with the interview of former DG of #AssamRifles Lt Gen Pradeep Nair #PCNair. Please remember, whatever that is happening in Manipur was planned, executed and orchestrated by the #ChinKukiNarcoterrorists under his watch! Manipur Police IG...

Satsangi3523's profile picture

Satsangi

4,641 subscribers

12,990 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

#AssamRifles#PCNair
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

Sons of Manipur profil fotoğrafı
Sons of Manipur1 yıl önce

Watch the vid if anyone wants to know the true face of the AR. The video shows it all, imagine how much the narcos might have paid them.

Satsangi profil fotoğrafı
Satsangi1 yıl önce

Thank you for sharing this 🙏🏻

David 𝐊𝐮𝐤𝐢 profil fotoğrafı
David 𝐊𝐮𝐤𝐢1 yıl önce

#Manipur #ManipurTapes is the Pandora box that released all these k!llings and tragedies. It needs proper and fair investigation by an unbias agency. @nia_india

Highlander_Xo profil fotoğrafı
Highlander_Xo1 yıl önce

Where is this guy when guns were distributed in the valley? Where is he when meitei police under his watch led mobs to destroyed properties. Where is this guy when people get slaughter in the valley. The 1st week of May23 witnessed more than 70 Kuki-Zo casualties in imphal.

Indigenous_Insight profil fotoğrafı
Indigenous_Insight1 yıl önce

Nice to see someone from Meitei "elder brother" community upholding their propaganda.... Can't wait to see egg all over his face if #NIA actually investigates

H.k profil fotoğrafı
H.k1 yıl önce

Why are no meitei policeman in hill??why are no Kuki policeman in valley??

Mani profil fotoğrafı
Mani1 yıl önce

Mr PC Nair always instigated this crisis.

Leing K profil fotoğrafı
Leing K1 yıl önce

Uncle Biren the mastermind Osama Biren

Bornfree profil fotoğrafı
Bornfree1 yıl önce

What is the difference between Tangkhul Naga and Meitei? Manipur Police works under the Crime Minister Biren.Maipur Police personals are have some knowledge and speak

kikon_H_ Lotha NAGA profil fotoğrafı
kikon_H_ Lotha NAGA1 yıl önce

Biren Dog. Muivah sir is hungry in money and he sell his religion and dignity. But i'm very glad bcoz he is naga.@ikmuivah @ImphalFreePress

Benzer Videolar

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith: "We've all seen people that we may not even be able to stand. But we don't want to see them murdered." "At this moment, we're talking about exactly what happened to this man and how vile and awful that is." "You have some people out there saying, 'Well, two things could be true. You can feel that way. And in the same breath, you can abhor some of the things that he said and some of the elements of his ideology.' No!" "Not when he's been killed by an assassin's bullet from 200 yards away! No, that stuff doesn't matter right now! He was murdered! That's what matters!" Daily Caller
1:06

🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith: "We've all seen people that we may not even be able to stand. But we don't want to see them murdered." "At this moment, we're talking about exactly what happened to this man and how vile and awful that is." "You have some people out there saying, 'Well, two things could be true. You can feel that way. And in the same breath, you can abhor some of the things that he said and some of the elements of his ideology.' No!" "Not when he's been killed by an assassin's bullet from 200 yards away! No, that stuff doesn't matter right now! He was murdered! That's what matters!" Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

311,687 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

#WATCH | Shillong: On the Manipur situation, Assam Rifles Director General Lieutenant General PC Nair says, "...If videos are going around, these are doctored videos. I can tell you I have about 30 to 40 videos which have been circulating. Don't even belong to the northeast. They are from Myanmar, they are from other places. Some of them are from the Rohingya region. But some people who have a hidden agenda to create trouble here are doctoring that and showing them as security forces acting against people. Yes, there have been certain other instances where videos of Manipur have been shown. But amongst those videos also, it is only part of the incident. Let's say an incident has happened for about five to ten minutes. Let's say there are people been stopped and Assam riffle trying to stop them or whatever. In these videos that are being propagated, they only show part clippings which makes the story very different. Unless you see the entire video, unless you see the complete facts, you will tend to get carried away by what is coming. And that is precisely what is happening. Part of the story, part of the photograph, and part of the videos are what are being made and shown to drive a certain agenda which is wrong..." He further added "...From the first day, that is from the 3 May itself, Assam Rifle has maintained a neutral stand (in Manipur). So all these narratives that have been coming are agenda-driven. It makes me laugh when I read some of these stupid reports stating that the Assam riffle is favouring one community, not favouring the other. These are nothing but rumours, falsehoods, preposterous. There is no background to this and I can substantiate it with statistics...to call us being biased towards a particular community is wrong...."
5:14

Sensitive content

#WATCH | Shillong: On the Manipur situation, Assam Rifles Director General Lieutenant General PC Nair says, "...If videos are going around, these are doctored videos. I can tell you I have about 30 to 40 videos which have been circulating. Don't even belong to the northeast. They are from Myanmar, they are from other places. Some of them are from the Rohingya region. But some people who have a hidden agenda to create trouble here are doctoring that and showing them as security forces acting against people. Yes, there have been certain other instances where videos of Manipur have been shown. But amongst those videos also, it is only part of the incident. Let's say an incident has happened for about five to ten minutes. Let's say there are people been stopped and Assam riffle trying to stop them or whatever. In these videos that are being propagated, they only show part clippings which makes the story very different. Unless you see the entire video, unless you see the complete facts, you will tend to get carried away by what is coming. And that is precisely what is happening. Part of the story, part of the photograph, and part of the videos are what are being made and shown to drive a certain agenda which is wrong..." He further added "...From the first day, that is from the 3 May itself, Assam Rifle has maintained a neutral stand (in Manipur). So all these narratives that have been coming are agenda-driven. It makes me laugh when I read some of these stupid reports stating that the Assam riffle is favouring one community, not favouring the other. These are nothing but rumours, falsehoods, preposterous. There is no background to this and I can substantiate it with statistics...to call us being biased towards a particular community is wrong...."

ANI

124,720 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

#WATCH | On the allegation by RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav that his name is not there in the electoral roll, Patna DM Dr Thiyagarajan SM says, "The name of the leader of the opposition is definitely there. The claim that his name is not there is completely wrong. His name is still there at the booth where he used to vote, and it is there in the public domain, everyone can see it... I want to say very clearly that all the voters of Patna district are requested to have some patience. You can see your name in the draft by your name or EPIC number. So there is no confusion in this...In the affidavit filed by him during nomination in the 2020 election, he has given this EPIC number in it, this is the number that we are telling. Now, if he is looking at any other EPIC card, then we will have to look at it. He has also filed a nomination in 2020 on the basis of the EPIC card given, and it is still existing. There is no change in it. The EPIC number that you had earlier will remain the same..."
3:25

#WATCH | On the allegation by RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav that his name is not there in the electoral roll, Patna DM Dr Thiyagarajan SM says, "The name of the leader of the opposition is definitely there. The claim that his name is not there is completely wrong. His name is still there at the booth where he used to vote, and it is there in the public domain, everyone can see it... I want to say very clearly that all the voters of Patna district are requested to have some patience. You can see your name in the draft by your name or EPIC number. So there is no confusion in this...In the affidavit filed by him during nomination in the 2020 election, he has given this EPIC number in it, this is the number that we are telling. Now, if he is looking at any other EPIC card, then we will have to look at it. He has also filed a nomination in 2020 on the basis of the EPIC card given, and it is still existing. There is no change in it. The EPIC number that you had earlier will remain the same..."

ANI

57,278 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Vice President Vance masterfully navigates Sarah Haines’ attempt at claiming that he is excusing Trump’s behavior for power. Haines brought up a past quote from Vance comparing Trump to Hitler, but as Vance pointed out, he was spoon fed propaganda about Trump by the media that was not true. HAINES: “And you also explain your evolution, similarly, on Trump. From calling him America’s Hitler to America’s best hope...” “What are you willing to excuse in the name of power?”’ VANCE: “I would say fundamentally that one of the things I under appreciated about Donald Trump is that many of the things people said about him weren’t actually true.” “Again, you talk about humility. I see Donald Trump, I see a clip of him or not even a clip of him but reporting about something that he said and take it at face value.” “For example, let’s just go back to one of the most controversial things Donald Trump said during the first term said that I was wrong, during the first campaign, is that I was led to believe by the stories...that said Donald Trump said all Mexicans were rapists.” “He never said that.” “What he said is that the...certain South American countries, central American countries, were releasing criminals into our country, including Mexico.” “By the way, that was objectively true.”
0:56

Vice President Vance masterfully navigates Sarah Haines’ attempt at claiming that he is excusing Trump’s behavior for power. Haines brought up a past quote from Vance comparing Trump to Hitler, but as Vance pointed out, he was spoon fed propaganda about Trump by the media that was not true. HAINES: “And you also explain your evolution, similarly, on Trump. From calling him America’s Hitler to America’s best hope...” “What are you willing to excuse in the name of power?”’ VANCE: “I would say fundamentally that one of the things I under appreciated about Donald Trump is that many of the things people said about him weren’t actually true.” “Again, you talk about humility. I see Donald Trump, I see a clip of him or not even a clip of him but reporting about something that he said and take it at face value.” “For example, let’s just go back to one of the most controversial things Donald Trump said during the first term said that I was wrong, during the first campaign, is that I was led to believe by the stories...that said Donald Trump said all Mexicans were rapists.” “He never said that.” “What he said is that the...certain South American countries, central American countries, were releasing criminals into our country, including Mexico.” “By the way, that was objectively true.”

Overton

60,002 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

The country was told Peter Lynch was a violent right wing extremist thug. Watch this video. Listen to what he says and how he says it and you will see that he was in fact just a softly spoken grandfather with concerns about the governance and future of his country that are shared by millions. He was put in prison and now he is dead. Shame on the state and the media that is supposed to protect people from tyranny, not facilitate it. RIP Peter.
1:27

Sensitive content

The country was told Peter Lynch was a violent right wing extremist thug. Watch this video. Listen to what he says and how he says it and you will see that he was in fact just a softly spoken grandfather with concerns about the governance and future of his country that are shared by millions. He was put in prison and now he is dead. Shame on the state and the media that is supposed to protect people from tyranny, not facilitate it. RIP Peter.

Andrew Bridgen

771,908 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Gilbert Arenas says this NBA season didn’t seem that impactful: “I don’t know why. There was no real stories out there. There was really no drama. It just like it came and went to be honest. What was the real top five stories of this season? KD and the Şengün thing. Okay. Tanking is every year. You see what I’m saying? Like the Ivy story is kind of like the only thing that really got some noise. But for the most part, there was really nothing that happened this year that was like really impactful to the league in growth, right? Didn’t have a bunch of 60 points being scored by different people that like, you know what I mean? There was really no record breaking of any sort. I mean, but I’m saying there was the 83 from Bam, which nobody wanted to respect and kind of like made that 83 seem like anybody can do it.” (Via Gilbert Arenas)
2:26

Gilbert Arenas says this NBA season didn’t seem that impactful: “I don’t know why. There was no real stories out there. There was really no drama. It just like it came and went to be honest. What was the real top five stories of this season? KD and the Şengün thing. Okay. Tanking is every year. You see what I’m saying? Like the Ivy story is kind of like the only thing that really got some noise. But for the most part, there was really nothing that happened this year that was like really impactful to the league in growth, right? Didn’t have a bunch of 60 points being scored by different people that like, you know what I mean? There was really no record breaking of any sort. I mean, but I’m saying there was the 83 from Bam, which nobody wanted to respect and kind of like made that 83 seem like anybody can do it.” (Via Gilbert Arenas)

NBA Courtside

58,198 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”
1:41

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”

Curtis Houck

64,113 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

.Bari Weiss in her CBS Mornings debut, promoting her town hall tomorrow with Erika Kirk and taking aim at those who celebrated Charlie’s assassination and the conspiracy theorists claiming she had something to do it... “I think Erika Kirk is a victim of what could be a very, very disturbing version of America. In other words, her husband was speaking on a college campus. Whether you agreed with him or not, he was practicing the most fundamental of American rights, he was trying to persuade people with words and then he got a bullet to his neck as he was speaking to someone that disagreed with him. Someone, by the way, who was in the audience that night. In the days and weeks that followed, the number of people in this country and not just lunatics on the internet hiding behind anonymous accounts, but prominent people justified his death with the idea that words are violence rather than violence being violence signifies something quite alarming. The idea that he somehow had it coming because people disagreed with him.” “The second thing is that in — he was murdered three months ago. If you go on the internet and frankly it is leapt beyond the internet into real life and you talk to many seemingly sane people, they do not believe that the 22-year-old named Tyler Robinson that has been arrested and charged with his murder is the actual murderer. “They believe any number of theories. They believe Erika Kirk was his Mossad handler and he was killed by a foreign government. They believe she was tracked by Egyptian planes. They believe that the rings on her hand are signs of illuminati. The theories themselves are absurd. What matters is that because — she speaks about this in the interview, the brain rot that social media is allowing to spread, the way that it is detaching us from humanity, from our ability to talk to one another and our ability to discern the truth from just out and out lies is something that is incredibly important as a theme, I think. So, she was able to speak to both of those things in a way that’s incredibly compelling.”
2:01

.Bari Weiss in her CBS Mornings debut, promoting her town hall tomorrow with Erika Kirk and taking aim at those who celebrated Charlie’s assassination and the conspiracy theorists claiming she had something to do it... “I think Erika Kirk is a victim of what could be a very, very disturbing version of America. In other words, her husband was speaking on a college campus. Whether you agreed with him or not, he was practicing the most fundamental of American rights, he was trying to persuade people with words and then he got a bullet to his neck as he was speaking to someone that disagreed with him. Someone, by the way, who was in the audience that night. In the days and weeks that followed, the number of people in this country and not just lunatics on the internet hiding behind anonymous accounts, but prominent people justified his death with the idea that words are violence rather than violence being violence signifies something quite alarming. The idea that he somehow had it coming because people disagreed with him.” “The second thing is that in — he was murdered three months ago. If you go on the internet and frankly it is leapt beyond the internet into real life and you talk to many seemingly sane people, they do not believe that the 22-year-old named Tyler Robinson that has been arrested and charged with his murder is the actual murderer. “They believe any number of theories. They believe Erika Kirk was his Mossad handler and he was killed by a foreign government. They believe she was tracked by Egyptian planes. They believe that the rings on her hand are signs of illuminati. The theories themselves are absurd. What matters is that because — she speaks about this in the interview, the brain rot that social media is allowing to spread, the way that it is detaching us from humanity, from our ability to talk to one another and our ability to discern the truth from just out and out lies is something that is incredibly important as a theme, I think. So, she was able to speak to both of those things in a way that’s incredibly compelling.”

Curtis Houck

78,679 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

WATCH: CNN’s Scott Jennings goes NUCLEAR on Biden official Kate Bedingfield for saying both sides need to calm down and the left has NOTHING to do with the Kirk assassin’s motive: “‘Why did I do it? I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.’ He — he has a flat — that is — that is the message that the shooter Tyler Robinson sent to his roommate. That is what he said. He also engraved the word, ‘hey, fascist catch’ on the bullet. For ten years, we have heard nothing from the left but that Donald Trump is a fascist. Republicans are Nazis. Authoritarians destroy the Constitution. Bloodbath. Dictator for a day. And he wrote it on the bullet. And he’s been obviously marinating in some kind of information that radicalized him based on what he heard in the air in this country.” “Are you trying to equate [Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman]? I’m sorry.” “I’m here to argue. All I know is what the — the prosecutor said today. He read very lucid messages from a shooter who was motivated by political hate, who had a plan to get away with it. He did not sound like a deranged person. He sounded like someone who had decided to take it upon himself to rid the world of someone that he hated politically, that he thought that the world would be better off without. That’s different than some deranged lunatic showing up off the street.” “I don’t know that you’re right about what happened in Minnesota. I don’t.” “What I am not happy about is that we have the shooter's words. We know what he put on the bullets. It's very, very, very clear what happened here and there is a movement by some people to completely say, well, we have no idea. And we do.”
3:48

WATCH: CNN’s Scott Jennings goes NUCLEAR on Biden official Kate Bedingfield for saying both sides need to calm down and the left has NOTHING to do with the Kirk assassin’s motive: “‘Why did I do it? I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.’ He — he has a flat — that is — that is the message that the shooter Tyler Robinson sent to his roommate. That is what he said. He also engraved the word, ‘hey, fascist catch’ on the bullet. For ten years, we have heard nothing from the left but that Donald Trump is a fascist. Republicans are Nazis. Authoritarians destroy the Constitution. Bloodbath. Dictator for a day. And he wrote it on the bullet. And he’s been obviously marinating in some kind of information that radicalized him based on what he heard in the air in this country.” “Are you trying to equate [Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman]? I’m sorry.” “I’m here to argue. All I know is what the — the prosecutor said today. He read very lucid messages from a shooter who was motivated by political hate, who had a plan to get away with it. He did not sound like a deranged person. He sounded like someone who had decided to take it upon himself to rid the world of someone that he hated politically, that he thought that the world would be better off without. That’s different than some deranged lunatic showing up off the street.” “I don’t know that you’re right about what happened in Minnesota. I don’t.” “What I am not happy about is that we have the shooter's words. We know what he put on the bullets. It's very, very, very clear what happened here and there is a movement by some people to completely say, well, we have no idea. And we do.”

Curtis Houck

77,413 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.
2:18

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones

36,857 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.
6:07

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

21,983 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

"BUILT INTO IT FROM THE BEGINNING": Watch as former Fifth Fleet commander VADM Kevin Donegan (USN-RET) shuts down the media's ridiculous "failed to plan for the Hormuz Strait" narrative, as put forth by ABC's Martha Raddatz. MARTHA RADDATZ: But-- but- you say we knew about their capabilities. And certainly in the Strait. Are you surprised that we didn't do more or have a bigger plan for- for- against that? DONEGAN: I would say that if you look at the campaign CENTCOM initiated, this was built into it from the beginning. And when you think about it in terms of the things that- that the Chairman said and the things that Admiral Cooper said his mission was, one of the things in there was- was to go after the (Iranian) Navy. And what they really meant was Iran's capability to control the Straits when this is over, because we don't want them to have power projection capability. We also don't want them to have this leverage over this internet. You know, this- such an important chokehold so this effort that that that's being done and being waged by CENTCOM is specifically to get at their cruise missile threat, their ability to launch drones at boats, put mines in the water, all those things that when this is over you want then NOT to have, if that makes any sense.
1:03

"BUILT INTO IT FROM THE BEGINNING": Watch as former Fifth Fleet commander VADM Kevin Donegan (USN-RET) shuts down the media's ridiculous "failed to plan for the Hormuz Strait" narrative, as put forth by ABC's Martha Raddatz. MARTHA RADDATZ: But-- but- you say we knew about their capabilities. And certainly in the Strait. Are you surprised that we didn't do more or have a bigger plan for- for- against that? DONEGAN: I would say that if you look at the campaign CENTCOM initiated, this was built into it from the beginning. And when you think about it in terms of the things that- that the Chairman said and the things that Admiral Cooper said his mission was, one of the things in there was- was to go after the (Iranian) Navy. And what they really meant was Iran's capability to control the Straits when this is over, because we don't want them to have power projection capability. We also don't want them to have this leverage over this internet. You know, this- such an important chokehold so this effort that that that's being done and being waged by CENTCOM is specifically to get at their cruise missile threat, their ability to launch drones at boats, put mines in the water, all those things that when this is over you want then NOT to have, if that makes any sense.

Jorge Bonilla

259,256 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

If you wanna know what they’re looking for I have the answers to most of your questions. What they’re looking for is secondary bullet fragmentation. I strongly believe that they are looking for a secondary bullet fragments. In the first video, you’ll see proof that the front wound on the victim is an exit. As the bullet bounced off the table and hit the security guard. The second video shows some of the police/security from Charlie’s team congregating right where the man was struck then you will see them looking around, and then the officer grabs the microphone and pointed in the same direction that it appears that the secondary fragmentation may have flew off after it struck the security guard non-penetrating strike. The third video is showing more detail from when the security was struck with the secondary fragment it hit him so hard. It gave him a Charlie horse pun intended. But it hit him so hard he couldn’t use his arm to jump that gate. You could see him trying to slip it through in between the security gates and that’s the reason why his watch got scuffed and damaged. The screenshot is showing a better view of the officer saying this way that way if the shot came from the Losee Center then why are they directing people towards that direction? The enter is is he’s telling the other people that are congregated by the gate. That way it went that way I believe that is exactly what’s going on there.
0:53

If you wanna know what they’re looking for I have the answers to most of your questions. What they’re looking for is secondary bullet fragmentation. I strongly believe that they are looking for a secondary bullet fragments. In the first video, you’ll see proof that the front wound on the victim is an exit. As the bullet bounced off the table and hit the security guard. The second video shows some of the police/security from Charlie’s team congregating right where the man was struck then you will see them looking around, and then the officer grabs the microphone and pointed in the same direction that it appears that the secondary fragmentation may have flew off after it struck the security guard non-penetrating strike. The third video is showing more detail from when the security was struck with the secondary fragment it hit him so hard. It gave him a Charlie horse pun intended. But it hit him so hard he couldn’t use his arm to jump that gate. You could see him trying to slip it through in between the security gates and that’s the reason why his watch got scuffed and damaged. The screenshot is showing a better view of the officer saying this way that way if the shot came from the Losee Center then why are they directing people towards that direction? The enter is is he’s telling the other people that are congregated by the gate. That way it went that way I believe that is exactly what’s going on there.

ClydeMax369

18,548 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

WOW, I Can’t Believe These Details About The Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii Fires & BlackRock Are Being Reported By The Media, This Women Needs To Be Protected “It's stunning to monitor the media's lack of interest in the whole Maui story. I've been in this business for 30 years. I'm stunned, but I'm not surprised. The incident seems to be the story here, right? But the true story, the media knows it is not allowed to tell. Is it a coincidence that the Maui police chief is the same man who was in charge in Las Vegas during that massacre that killed 58 people? Is it a coincidence that the Maui property, owned by million and billionaires, wasn't touched by the flames while homes of the locals all burned? What she fails to also mention is how the media hasn't even once interviewed a grieving parent. Not a single parent looking for their children. Not a single interview with a child. Not a single interview with the schools. Was it a coincidence that the largest system of outdoor emergency sirens in the world never made a sound as the fire devoured Lahaina. Was it a coincidence that at the same time, very same time, all the water was turned off? Was it a coincidence that police were ordered to block off streets and to funnel all the cars trying to escape? Think about this coincidence. That governor also signed an emergency proclamation on July 17th, three weeks before the fire, about housing of all things. Is it a coincidence that the government put up a black fence around Lahaina? Or that the FAA grounded all drones from flying over the affected areas? Is it a coincidence that since at least 2011 there have been plans to make Maui the first smart city run by 100% renewable energy? And that it must be a coincidence then that the locals whose homes did not burn are now being evicted from their property? And of course, a total coincidence that all the fact checkers who are checking these facts who say everything I just told you is just a coincidence are also owned and run by BlackRock.” DEWs, Direct Energy Weapons #Hawaii #Maui #MauiFires #Lahaina #LahainaFires #DEWs #DirectedEnergyWeapons
1:48

WOW, I Can’t Believe These Details About The Lahaina, Maui, Hawaii Fires & BlackRock Are Being Reported By The Media, This Women Needs To Be Protected “It's stunning to monitor the media's lack of interest in the whole Maui story. I've been in this business for 30 years. I'm stunned, but I'm not surprised. The incident seems to be the story here, right? But the true story, the media knows it is not allowed to tell. Is it a coincidence that the Maui police chief is the same man who was in charge in Las Vegas during that massacre that killed 58 people? Is it a coincidence that the Maui property, owned by million and billionaires, wasn't touched by the flames while homes of the locals all burned? What she fails to also mention is how the media hasn't even once interviewed a grieving parent. Not a single parent looking for their children. Not a single interview with a child. Not a single interview with the schools. Was it a coincidence that the largest system of outdoor emergency sirens in the world never made a sound as the fire devoured Lahaina. Was it a coincidence that at the same time, very same time, all the water was turned off? Was it a coincidence that police were ordered to block off streets and to funnel all the cars trying to escape? Think about this coincidence. That governor also signed an emergency proclamation on July 17th, three weeks before the fire, about housing of all things. Is it a coincidence that the government put up a black fence around Lahaina? Or that the FAA grounded all drones from flying over the affected areas? Is it a coincidence that since at least 2011 there have been plans to make Maui the first smart city run by 100% renewable energy? And that it must be a coincidence then that the locals whose homes did not burn are now being evicted from their property? And of course, a total coincidence that all the fact checkers who are checking these facts who say everything I just told you is just a coincidence are also owned and run by BlackRock.” DEWs, Direct Energy Weapons #Hawaii #Maui #MauiFires #Lahaina #LahainaFires #DEWs #DirectedEnergyWeapons

Wall Street Apes

849,215 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein
2:10

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

695,930 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Ian Carroll I hope this is not the testimony you’re referring to. If so, it just further proves what a liar you are. Nestor: “But you don’t know what the K9 was tasked with?” Detective Hull: “My understanding was that it may have been used in an effort to track an individual that jumped off the roof, but I don’t know for certain.” Nestor: “Obviously that didn’t produce any results?” Detective Hull: “Not that I was made aware of.” The full account from Agent Faumina (SBI) of how the rifle was found is provided in this clip. Facts: 1) There is zero evidence the rifle was missed by any dogs. 2) There is no evidence that “bomb” dogs were ever tasked with finding the rifle. 3) There is zero evidence that FBI agents directed UT County Sheriff Deputies where to look for the rifle as claimed by Candace. 4) There is no evidence the “rifle was planted by the Feds” as claimed/insinuated by Candace. It’s another convenient, unverifiable BS story from an anonymous source, pushed by Candace Owens and her chief lying lapdog Ian Carroll. Those claims are contradicted by testimony and facts. Remember y’all, in 10 months Candace Owens has not produced a single piece of evidence that could be admitted in court. Also remember that Ian Carroll called the picture of the rifle a “stock photo” for over 10 months and still hasn’t corrected the record or admitted he lied (or was wrong). Wake up.
2:07

Ian Carroll I hope this is not the testimony you’re referring to. If so, it just further proves what a liar you are. Nestor: “But you don’t know what the K9 was tasked with?” Detective Hull: “My understanding was that it may have been used in an effort to track an individual that jumped off the roof, but I don’t know for certain.” Nestor: “Obviously that didn’t produce any results?” Detective Hull: “Not that I was made aware of.” The full account from Agent Faumina (SBI) of how the rifle was found is provided in this clip. Facts: 1) There is zero evidence the rifle was missed by any dogs. 2) There is no evidence that “bomb” dogs were ever tasked with finding the rifle. 3) There is zero evidence that FBI agents directed UT County Sheriff Deputies where to look for the rifle as claimed by Candace. 4) There is no evidence the “rifle was planted by the Feds” as claimed/insinuated by Candace. It’s another convenient, unverifiable BS story from an anonymous source, pushed by Candace Owens and her chief lying lapdog Ian Carroll. Those claims are contradicted by testimony and facts. Remember y’all, in 10 months Candace Owens has not produced a single piece of evidence that could be admitted in court. Also remember that Ian Carroll called the picture of the rifle a “stock photo” for over 10 months and still hasn’t corrected the record or admitted he lied (or was wrong). Wake up.

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

17,376 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.
1:26

“I can’t speak on whether he was close to converting…I do think from what I’ve been told that he was planning on signing up and starting that process [of becoming Catholic]. But I did not personally have that conversation with him…” A few things: Candace says she can’t speak on whether Charlie was close to converting to Catholicism—and then immediately goes on to speak about how she thinks he was close to converting. 🙄 Additionally, the first time she ever spoke about this (September 15th, see the 2nd clip below) she suggested he was close to converting. Because it’s Candace, she didn’t come right out and say, but she said he “was on the verge of changing some of his beliefs” and then went on to speak about how he was praying the rosary and attending mass. She also referenced him “taking that last step.” All of those things paired together imply (again without outright saying) he was close to converting. She also said in the same episode he was “too smart to be Protestant.” Mind you, this was FIVE DAYS after Charlie had been murdered. Charlie’s parents are Protestant. His wife was raised Catholic but is now Protestant. And whether you think he was close to converting or not, Charlie died Protestant. Her saying that FIVE DAYS after his murder was callous and tone deaf. This is how Candace makes things always and all about herself. This was in fact the first thing that clued me in that something was seriously wrong, after previously being her fan. Today, she doubled down on her implications that Charlie was close to converting (even though again she’d just said she couldn’t speak on that). She said she and Charlie were having conversations about it, but the only evidence she’s ever presented is a single vague text allegedly from him and dated February 2024. The problem is that Charlie went on to reiterate he was evangelical and all of his issues with the Catholic faith this year, in the months leading up to his death. Indeed, one of the final things he said on this earth the day he died was that he was evangelical. So even if he sent that text to Candace in February of 2024, it’s clear he wasn’t that convicted and that she read more into it than was actually meant. Because again, this year, in 2025, he was reaffirming his evangelical faith. Lastly, Candace admitted today that she heard from someone else that Charlie was becoming Catholic (likely Bishop Joseph Brennan). But if she and Charlie were already having conversations about the possibility of him converting (as she claims they were), why wouldn’t he tell Candace directly? Especially when again they allegedly were already having conversations about it? Please listen to what this woman actually says from one month, one week, one day to the next. And parse it out. Hear what she’s saying and also what she’s not saying. Determine what she’s implying. Compare herself to herself. And see if she makes sense to you, if she provides clarity to you, if she provides evidence. Not just on the subject of Charlie converting but on all subjects pertaining to this “investigation.” Finally, this has NOTHING to do with who murdered Charlie and why. I’m tired of talking about it, but she keeps being dishonest about what she actually said, again a mere five days after his murder.

Natalie Jean Beisner

42,513 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Jimmy Kimmel’s wife admits she’s lost relationships with her Trump-voting family - GregGutfeld explains why the only people to blame are herself and the fake news “How did you get to the point where people will no longer talk to their families over Trump? It’s because of stories like that that portray Trump in a way that was false. The ‘fine people’ hoax was like one of the biggest ones… If you were to talk to Mrs. Kimmel she would not know what you were talking about. She probably still believes the ‘fine people’ hoax… The truth came out. She said it was HER. SHE needed the de-programming, it was not their that there was something wrong with his relatives, she realized that she was exhausted by being angry all the time. But that’s on her. You have a choice of putting these things in your head. You don’t have to think of Trump all the time!”
2:03

Jimmy Kimmel’s wife admits she’s lost relationships with her Trump-voting family - GregGutfeld explains why the only people to blame are herself and the fake news “How did you get to the point where people will no longer talk to their families over Trump? It’s because of stories like that that portray Trump in a way that was false. The ‘fine people’ hoax was like one of the biggest ones… If you were to talk to Mrs. Kimmel she would not know what you were talking about. She probably still believes the ‘fine people’ hoax… The truth came out. She said it was HER. SHE needed the de-programming, it was not their that there was something wrong with his relatives, she realized that she was exhausted by being angry all the time. But that’s on her. You have a choice of putting these things in your head. You don’t have to think of Trump all the time!”

The Five

23,275 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce