Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Most blockchains ask validators to see everything. ELVES changes that. The research team at Web3 Foundation built ELVES so that a random subset of validators can verify each block, rather than the full set, unless needed. Each validator does less work, but the network as a whole does more.... show more

Parity Technologies

68,100 subscribers

32,683 views • 28 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We’re thrilled to announce our $2M seed round at a $25M FDV. But what makes this raise truly special is that it was driven by our community. The validators, miners, and early adopters pushing decentralized AI forward. Additionally, a special welcome to two of the largest TAO validator groups WildSage Labs | Validator | VaaS | IaaS from RoundTable21 & Team Rizzo AI from DNA, as well as Gateway FM who each bring deep expertise and firepower to the network. DeepNode was built for the people who shape intelligence. And today, that community becomes even stronger.

We’re thrilled to announce our $2M seed round at a $25M FDV. But what makes this raise truly special is that it was driven by our community. The validators, miners, and early adopters pushing decentralized AI forward. Additionally, a special welcome to two of the largest TAO validator groups WildSage Labs | Validator | VaaS | IaaS from RoundTable21 & Team Rizzo AI from DNA, as well as Gateway FM who each bring deep expertise and firepower to the network. DeepNode was built for the people who shape intelligence. And today, that community becomes even stronger.

DeepNode AI

90,076 views • 6 months ago

Glamsterdam is the performance upgrade, I've already talked about it. But Hegotá is something different: scheduled for H2 2026, it's Ethereum's "cleanup and hardening" fork. 3 problems. 3 technical solutions. All shipping in one fork 👇 1️⃣ The problem Hegotá is actually solving Glamsterdam targets throughput: 10,000 TPS, 200M gas limit, parallel execution. The performance gap with Solana narrows materially. Hegotá targets something harder to quantify but more fundamental. After Glamsterdam, Ethereum will be fast. The question Hegotá answers is: fast and controlled by whom? The Tornado Cash sanctions in 2022 exposed the vulnerability. OFAC-compliant block builders (the entities that construct Ethereum blocks under MEV-Boost) began filtering Tornado Cash transactions entirely. Legitimate users with sanctioned addresses couldn't get transactions included. The block builders, sitting between validators and the mempool, had the practical ability to censor at will. ePBS (shipping in Glamsterdam) brings block building onchain and removes the external relay dependency. But it doesn't solve the censorship problem at the transaction inclusion level. A block builder onchain can still refuse to include specific transactions. FOCIL solves that. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2️⃣ FOCIL: anti-censorship mechanism EIP-7805. Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists. The mechanism: every block slot, 17 participants are randomly selected from the validator set. Each one can submit a short list of transactions they want included in the next block. The block builder, even the onchain builder introduced by ePBS, must include those transactions or the block is invalid. 17 random validators per slot. Statistically, any attempt to censor a transaction requires controlling enough of the validator set to dominate every random selection simultaneously. At Ethereum's current validator count accounting for over 1 million, that requires controlling a supermajority of stake. In practice, FOCIL makes censorship at the block production level computationally and economically prohibitive for any entity that doesn't control an implausible share of staked ETH. → Block builders can no longer selectively exclude transactions → OFAC-compliant relays lose their censorship leverage at the inclusion layer → The Tornado Cash scenario becomes structurally impossible at protocol level → FOCIL prototype has a runnable implementation, entering multi-client devnet validation now This is the most significant censorship-resistance improvement in Ethereum's history. It's also the least discussed upgrade in CT because censorship resistance doesn't generate price speculation the way throughput numbers do. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3️⃣ Verkle Trees: the node operator revolution Currently, Ethereum nodes use Merkle Patricia Trees to store and verify state. To verify any piece of state, a node needs a "witness": a proof that includes all the intermediate hashes along the path from the root to the target data. For Ethereum's current state size, witnesses are large, bandwidth-heavy, and require the node to store significant local data. Verkle Trees replace this with a cryptographic structure that produces dramatically smaller witnesses. The same proof that requires kilobytes under the Merkle Patricia Tree model requires only hundreds of bytes under Verkle Trees. The consequence: → Node storage requirements drop by approximately 90% → Witnesses become small enough to transmit in real time during block propagation → "Stateless clients" become possible thanks to nodes that can verify the chain without storing full state locally → The hardware and bandwidth requirements to run a full Ethereum node drop to consumer levels permanently The long-term threat to Ethereum's decentralisation is not a 51% attack but the quiet centralization of the validator set as node hardware requirements creep upward with state growth. Verkle Trees break that trend structurally: → Anyone with a laptop and residential internet can run a full node post-Hegotá → The validator set becomes more accessible, not less, as Ethereum scales → Home stakers that represents the most decentralisation-aligned validator category stop being priced out by state growth The transition requires migrating every account and contract on the network from the Merkle Patricia Tree structure to Verkle Trees. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4️⃣ Account Abstraction ERC-4337 account abstraction has existed as an application-layer standard since 2023. Hegotá brings native protocol-level account abstraction: the scope has been defined and the multi-client devnet validation phase is beginning now. What protocol-level AA enables that ERC-4337 doesn't: → Any Ethereum account can have programmable spending rules without deploying a separate smart contract → Social recovery becomes a native feature → Gasless transactions, batched operations, and custom signature schemes work at the protocol level rather than requiring wrapper contracts → The UX gap between crypto wallets and traditional financial apps narrows at the infrastructure level For DeFi specifically, account abstraction at the protocol level means liquidation bots, yield automation, and portfolio management strategies can be encoded directly into wallet logic. The current pattern of deploying separate smart contract accounts for every user who wants programmable behaviour disappears. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5️⃣ The thesis The Glamsterdam piece ended with a thesis about performance re-rating and monetary premium recovery. Hegotá's thesis is different and in some ways more durable. Ethereum in early 2027 (post both upgrades) will be a structurally different network from the one that exists today. Not only faster. Harder to censor. Cheaper to secure. More accessible to home validators. Native smart account functionality for every user. The market prices upgrades for what they do to throughput and fees because those metrics are immediately visible. Censorship resistance, node decentralisation, and wallet programmability compound over years rather than showing up in 30-day fee data. Hegotá is the upgrade that determines whether Ethereum is still genuinely decentralised and censorship-resistant five years from now... ...or whether it quietly became something controlled by a small set of sophisticated block builders and large node operators. That question doesn't generate CT threads. But if think about it is the one that actually matters!

Glamsterdam is the performance upgrade, I've already talked about it. But Hegotá is something different: scheduled for H2 2026, it's Ethereum's "cleanup and hardening" fork. 3 problems. 3 technical solutions. All shipping in one fork 👇 1️⃣ The problem Hegotá is actually solving Glamsterdam targets throughput: 10,000 TPS, 200M gas limit, parallel execution. The performance gap with Solana narrows materially. Hegotá targets something harder to quantify but more fundamental. After Glamsterdam, Ethereum will be fast. The question Hegotá answers is: fast and controlled by whom? The Tornado Cash sanctions in 2022 exposed the vulnerability. OFAC-compliant block builders (the entities that construct Ethereum blocks under MEV-Boost) began filtering Tornado Cash transactions entirely. Legitimate users with sanctioned addresses couldn't get transactions included. The block builders, sitting between validators and the mempool, had the practical ability to censor at will. ePBS (shipping in Glamsterdam) brings block building onchain and removes the external relay dependency. But it doesn't solve the censorship problem at the transaction inclusion level. A block builder onchain can still refuse to include specific transactions. FOCIL solves that. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2️⃣ FOCIL: anti-censorship mechanism EIP-7805. Fork-Choice Enforced Inclusion Lists. The mechanism: every block slot, 17 participants are randomly selected from the validator set. Each one can submit a short list of transactions they want included in the next block. The block builder, even the onchain builder introduced by ePBS, must include those transactions or the block is invalid. 17 random validators per slot. Statistically, any attempt to censor a transaction requires controlling enough of the validator set to dominate every random selection simultaneously. At Ethereum's current validator count accounting for over 1 million, that requires controlling a supermajority of stake. In practice, FOCIL makes censorship at the block production level computationally and economically prohibitive for any entity that doesn't control an implausible share of staked ETH. → Block builders can no longer selectively exclude transactions → OFAC-compliant relays lose their censorship leverage at the inclusion layer → The Tornado Cash scenario becomes structurally impossible at protocol level → FOCIL prototype has a runnable implementation, entering multi-client devnet validation now This is the most significant censorship-resistance improvement in Ethereum's history. It's also the least discussed upgrade in CT because censorship resistance doesn't generate price speculation the way throughput numbers do. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3️⃣ Verkle Trees: the node operator revolution Currently, Ethereum nodes use Merkle Patricia Trees to store and verify state. To verify any piece of state, a node needs a "witness": a proof that includes all the intermediate hashes along the path from the root to the target data. For Ethereum's current state size, witnesses are large, bandwidth-heavy, and require the node to store significant local data. Verkle Trees replace this with a cryptographic structure that produces dramatically smaller witnesses. The same proof that requires kilobytes under the Merkle Patricia Tree model requires only hundreds of bytes under Verkle Trees. The consequence: → Node storage requirements drop by approximately 90% → Witnesses become small enough to transmit in real time during block propagation → "Stateless clients" become possible thanks to nodes that can verify the chain without storing full state locally → The hardware and bandwidth requirements to run a full Ethereum node drop to consumer levels permanently The long-term threat to Ethereum's decentralisation is not a 51% attack but the quiet centralization of the validator set as node hardware requirements creep upward with state growth. Verkle Trees break that trend structurally: → Anyone with a laptop and residential internet can run a full node post-Hegotá → The validator set becomes more accessible, not less, as Ethereum scales → Home stakers that represents the most decentralisation-aligned validator category stop being priced out by state growth The transition requires migrating every account and contract on the network from the Merkle Patricia Tree structure to Verkle Trees. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4️⃣ Account Abstraction ERC-4337 account abstraction has existed as an application-layer standard since 2023. Hegotá brings native protocol-level account abstraction: the scope has been defined and the multi-client devnet validation phase is beginning now. What protocol-level AA enables that ERC-4337 doesn't: → Any Ethereum account can have programmable spending rules without deploying a separate smart contract → Social recovery becomes a native feature → Gasless transactions, batched operations, and custom signature schemes work at the protocol level rather than requiring wrapper contracts → The UX gap between crypto wallets and traditional financial apps narrows at the infrastructure level For DeFi specifically, account abstraction at the protocol level means liquidation bots, yield automation, and portfolio management strategies can be encoded directly into wallet logic. The current pattern of deploying separate smart contract accounts for every user who wants programmable behaviour disappears. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5️⃣ The thesis The Glamsterdam piece ended with a thesis about performance re-rating and monetary premium recovery. Hegotá's thesis is different and in some ways more durable. Ethereum in early 2027 (post both upgrades) will be a structurally different network from the one that exists today. Not only faster. Harder to censor. Cheaper to secure. More accessible to home validators. Native smart account functionality for every user. The market prices upgrades for what they do to throughput and fees because those metrics are immediately visible. Censorship resistance, node decentralisation, and wallet programmability compound over years rather than showing up in 30-day fee data. Hegotá is the upgrade that determines whether Ethereum is still genuinely decentralised and censorship-resistant five years from now... ...or whether it quietly became something controlled by a small set of sophisticated block builders and large node operators. That question doesn't generate CT threads. But if think about it is the one that actually matters!

Mercek

18,052 views • 29 days ago

$Ethereum Part 14: L1 zkEVM Every ETH validator re-executes every transaction in every block, millions of nodes, same computation. ZK proofs eliminate that entirely. One proof, at fraction of the cost. Same security. This is how Ethereum scales without breaking. Watch now👇$

Ethereum Part 14: L1 zkEVM Every ETH validator re-executes every transaction in every block, millions of nodes, same computation. ZK proofs eliminate that entirely. One proof, at fraction of the cost. Same security. This is how Ethereum scales without breaking. Watch now👇

marilyn100x.eth

35,953 views • 2 months ago

A bedrock principle for the Center for Internet Security is that there needs to be a foundation of defense. That doesn't mean everything gets protected the same. But it does mean some level of security is expected.

A bedrock principle for the Center for Internet Security is that there needs to be a foundation of defense. That doesn't mean everything gets protected the same. But it does mean some level of security is expected.

Center for Internet Security (CIS)

398,606 views • 2 months ago

Arteta says he’s upset Arsenal don’t score more set-pieces: “I certainly want to be (the best) I'm upset that we don't score more [set-pieces] and that we concede as well. So we want to be the best and the most dominant team in every aspect of the game. “That's the trajectory and the aim of this team and as a club, we want to be the same. So try to do that.”

Arteta says he’s upset Arsenal don’t score more set-pieces: “I certainly want to be (the best) I'm upset that we don't score more [set-pieces] and that we concede as well. So we want to be the best and the most dominant team in every aspect of the game. “That's the trajectory and the aim of this team and as a club, we want to be the same. So try to do that.”

Connor Humm

48,719 views • 3 months ago

After an incredibly successful week at Token2049, the highlight was undoubtedly presenting our SPIN whitepaper at the Bleeding Edge Summit! While still waiting for the official video, we would like to share a recording from the audience. With SPIN, we're introducing a revolutionary approach to building proof-of-stake blockchains. There is a well-known chicken and egg problem when it comes to launching a new proof-of-stake blockchain. You need high value at stake to achieve economic security, but at the same time, for achieving that, you already need to be secure. With SPIN, you can borrow security from well-established networks such as Polkadot or Ethereum. Unlike a Layer 2, which completely gives up chain sovereignty and frequently sacrifices scalability and throughput to satisfy Layer 1 validation protocols, SPIN maintains full sovereignty of the Fast Chain while still benefiting from the security of the Anchor Chain. Our SPIN protocol addresses this fundamental challenge by enabling a fast, sovereign chain to maintain and grow its economic security with its own validator network, while simultaneously leveraging an established anchor chain to provide a second layer of finality. With SPIN, we take an unlimited set of stakers, reduce it to a limited set of validators who can run very quickly, producing a consecutive sequence of blocks during their staker period. This design allows for blocks with very small block times, as low as 0.1 seconds and beyond. Our full SPIN whitepaper will be released soon.

After an incredibly successful week at Token2049, the highlight was undoubtedly presenting our SPIN whitepaper at the Bleeding Edge Summit! While still waiting for the official video, we would like to share a recording from the audience. With SPIN, we're introducing a revolutionary approach to building proof-of-stake blockchains. There is a well-known chicken and egg problem when it comes to launching a new proof-of-stake blockchain. You need high value at stake to achieve economic security, but at the same time, for achieving that, you already need to be secure. With SPIN, you can borrow security from well-established networks such as Polkadot or Ethereum. Unlike a Layer 2, which completely gives up chain sovereignty and frequently sacrifices scalability and throughput to satisfy Layer 1 validation protocols, SPIN maintains full sovereignty of the Fast Chain while still benefiting from the security of the Anchor Chain. Our SPIN protocol addresses this fundamental challenge by enabling a fast, sovereign chain to maintain and grow its economic security with its own validator network, while simultaneously leveraging an established anchor chain to provide a second layer of finality. With SPIN, we take an unlimited set of stakers, reduce it to a limited set of validators who can run very quickly, producing a consecutive sequence of blocks during their staker period. This design allows for blocks with very small block times, as low as 0.1 seconds and beyond. Our full SPIN whitepaper will be released soon.

QF Network

25,542 views • 1 year ago

Most $SUI holders know one thing about the token: total supply is capped at 10 billion. They have never read the mechanic that makes that cap matter. It is called the Storage Fund. And it is the most important thing in the $SUI tokenomics docs that nobody is talking about. Here is exactly how it works: Every time a transaction adds data to the Sui blockchain, the user pays a storage fee. That fee does not go to validators directly. It goes into the Storage Fund, a pool of SUI that never fully depletes. Here is where it gets interesting. The Storage Fund has its own stake in the network. It earns staking rewards the same way every other stakeholder does. Those rewards are then distributed to validators to compensate them for storing historical data. This solves a problem every other blockchain ignores: When a new validator joins Sui, they have to store all the historical data from transactions that happened before they existed. Why would a new validator pay to store someone else's old data? The Storage Fund pays them for it. Past users who created the storage requirements in the first place funded the pool. Future validators get compensated from that pool indefinitely. The fund pays out only the returns on its capital, never the principal. It cannot be drained. It is designed to survive forever. Now here is the part that directly connects to $SUI token value. The Sui docs state this explicitly: Deflation is a feature of Sui, not a bug. Here is why: Total supply is capped at 10 billion SUI. As network activity increases, more transactions are processed. More transactions mean more storage fees flowing into the Storage Fund. As the Storage Fund grows, it holds more SUI. More SUI held in the fund means less SUI in active circulation. Less circulating supply against the same or growing demand means the value of each SUI token increases. Network growth directly reduces circulating supply. That is not speculation. That is the economic model built into the protocol at the architecture level. One more detail worth knowing: If you delete data you stored on chain, you receive a partial refund of your original storage fees. The system charges for storage, rewards deletion, and compounds the fund's stake indefinitely. Most people holding $SUI today are pricing the speed narrative: The parallel transaction processing. The sub-second finality. The Move language safety. They have not started pricing the storage fund deflation mechanic. That gap between what the tokenomics actually does and what the market currently understands is where the long-term thesis lives. The people who read the docs always buy before the people who read the price.

Most $SUI holders know one thing about the token: total supply is capped at 10 billion. They have never read the mechanic that makes that cap matter. It is called the Storage Fund. And it is the most important thing in the $SUI tokenomics docs that nobody is talking about. Here is exactly how it works: Every time a transaction adds data to the Sui blockchain, the user pays a storage fee. That fee does not go to validators directly. It goes into the Storage Fund, a pool of SUI that never fully depletes. Here is where it gets interesting. The Storage Fund has its own stake in the network. It earns staking rewards the same way every other stakeholder does. Those rewards are then distributed to validators to compensate them for storing historical data. This solves a problem every other blockchain ignores: When a new validator joins Sui, they have to store all the historical data from transactions that happened before they existed. Why would a new validator pay to store someone else's old data? The Storage Fund pays them for it. Past users who created the storage requirements in the first place funded the pool. Future validators get compensated from that pool indefinitely. The fund pays out only the returns on its capital, never the principal. It cannot be drained. It is designed to survive forever. Now here is the part that directly connects to $SUI token value. The Sui docs state this explicitly: Deflation is a feature of Sui, not a bug. Here is why: Total supply is capped at 10 billion SUI. As network activity increases, more transactions are processed. More transactions mean more storage fees flowing into the Storage Fund. As the Storage Fund grows, it holds more SUI. More SUI held in the fund means less SUI in active circulation. Less circulating supply against the same or growing demand means the value of each SUI token increases. Network growth directly reduces circulating supply. That is not speculation. That is the economic model built into the protocol at the architecture level. One more detail worth knowing: If you delete data you stored on chain, you receive a partial refund of your original storage fees. The system charges for storage, rewards deletion, and compounds the fund's stake indefinitely. Most people holding $SUI today are pricing the speed narrative: The parallel transaction processing. The sub-second finality. The Move language safety. They have not started pricing the storage fund deflation mechanic. That gap between what the tokenomics actually does and what the market currently understands is where the long-term thesis lives. The people who read the docs always buy before the people who read the price.

2xnmore

47,237 views • 1 month ago

Why does everyone see machine elves on DMT? Some people suggest it's a "pre-conditioning" of the mind from leaders like Terence McKenna—you expect to see elves on DMT, so you see them. Andrew Gallimore, a top DMT researcher, explains that it's something even more mystical:

Why does everyone see machine elves on DMT? Some people suggest it's a "pre-conditioning" of the mind from leaders like Terence McKenna—you expect to see elves on DMT, so you see them. Andrew Gallimore, a top DMT researcher, explains that it's something even more mystical:

Danny Jones

219,495 views • 11 months ago

This is one of the dumbest takes I’ve seen in a while. Gainzy said SUI is worthless because it’s “centralized.” Let’s break that down: After the Cetus hack, Sui validators froze $162M from the hacker. But they weren’t forced. Each validator chose to block the wallet using a config file. No one was told what to do. Now the community will vote what to do with the funds. Sui Foundation won’t vote. Only validators and holders through delegation. That’s not centralization. Ethereum reversed a hack. Solana paused the chain. Bitcoin had a bug that printed 184B BTC. Also, this guy says Sui only pays KOLs While he’s getting paid by PumpFun to stream. Every chain has paid creators or systems like Kaito to have more mindshare It’s called marketing

This is one of the dumbest takes I’ve seen in a while. Gainzy said SUI is worthless because it’s “centralized.” Let’s break that down: After the Cetus hack, Sui validators froze $162M from the hacker. But they weren’t forced. Each validator chose to block the wallet using a config file. No one was told what to do. Now the community will vote what to do with the funds. Sui Foundation won’t vote. Only validators and holders through delegation. That’s not centralization. Ethereum reversed a hack. Solana paused the chain. Bitcoin had a bug that printed 184B BTC. Also, this guy says Sui only pays KOLs While he’s getting paid by PumpFun to stream. Every chain has paid creators or systems like Kaito to have more mindshare It’s called marketing

StarPlatinum

44,915 views • 1 year ago

$🚨 WHY IS $XRP DECENTRALIZED? 🚨 𝕏RP operates on the XRP Ledger, a distributed ledger technology managed by a network of over 150 independent validators, spread globally, with no single entity controlling more than a small fraction. Ripple, the company associated with XRP, runs only about 3% of these validators, and anyone can run a validator node, ensuring no central authority dominates. The ledger uses a consensus protocol, not proof-of-work or proof-of-stake, where validators agree on transaction validity every few seconds, making it resilient to control or censorship. Unlike Bitcoin, XRP’s supply isn’t mined; it was pre-allocated, with Ripple holding a portion in escrow, released gradually. However, the ledger’s open-source nature and diverse validator pool counter this, as no single party can alter the network’s rules or halt transactions without broad consensus. Comment Below & Follow For More!!👇👇 #XRPL $RLUSD #Ripple #SEC$

🚨 WHY IS $XRP DECENTRALIZED? 🚨 𝕏RP operates on the XRP Ledger, a distributed ledger technology managed by a network of over 150 independent validators, spread globally, with no single entity controlling more than a small fraction. Ripple, the company associated with XRP, runs only about 3% of these validators, and anyone can run a validator node, ensuring no central authority dominates. The ledger uses a consensus protocol, not proof-of-work or proof-of-stake, where validators agree on transaction validity every few seconds, making it resilient to control or censorship. Unlike Bitcoin, XRP’s supply isn’t mined; it was pre-allocated, with Ripple holding a portion in escrow, released gradually. However, the ledger’s open-source nature and diverse validator pool counter this, as no single party can alter the network’s rules or halt transactions without broad consensus. Comment Below & Follow For More!!👇👇 #XRPL $RLUSD #Ripple #SEC

Good Evening Crypto

119,868 views • 10 months ago

OnlyDevs with shek and Harkirat Singh 🤖 in this episode, dhruvsol explains the ins and outs of validators on solana, the challenges involved, and a demo of how you can set up yours. you will never require another tutorial again. this is your 101 guide on solana validators. timestamps: (00:00) introduction (01:02) what is a validator? (04:17) mining on solana (05:44) solana validators explained (09:06) what happens if a validator goes down? (10:54) starting a voting node (12:20) stake and rewards (15:07) understanding proof of stake (21:20) type of account required (23:33) live demo: how to set up a voting validator (1:06:30) outro

OnlyDevs with shek and Harkirat Singh 🤖 in this episode, dhruvsol explains the ins and outs of validators on solana, the challenges involved, and a demo of how you can set up yours. you will never require another tutorial again. this is your 101 guide on solana validators. timestamps: (00:00) introduction (01:02) what is a validator? (04:17) mining on solana (05:44) solana validators explained (09:06) what happens if a validator goes down? (10:54) starting a voting node (12:20) stake and rewards (15:07) understanding proof of stake (21:20) type of account required (23:33) live demo: how to set up a voting validator (1:06:30) outro

Superteam India

11,435 views • 1 year ago

Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto Guido Crosetto said that NATO "as it is, no longer has a reason to exist," and that the EU does not count on the global stage. "The U.N. counts in the world as much as Europe does: nothing, less than a national team, less than China, less than India, or less than Israel. NATO, as it is, no longer has a reason to exist. Because once the center of the world was the Atlantic Ocean — now, the center of the world is the world itself. Once, the world was the United States and Europe. Now, there is everything else with which a relationship must be built. If NATO was founded to guarantee mutual defense, to ensure peace, then the more it expands, the more it becomes an organization that takes on this role at a global level — engaging with the Global South, from Brazil to India, to Australia, to Japan — and in doing so, it transforms into something profoundly different. In this transformation, Article 5 becomes the foundation of the UN — that is, of a multilateral body dedicated to defending a world that is increasingly integrated in its pursuit of peace. Otherwise, we will fail to achieve the goal we all share: a system of security where everyone can engage based on rules that apply to all," he said.

Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto Guido Crosetto said that NATO "as it is, no longer has a reason to exist," and that the EU does not count on the global stage. "The U.N. counts in the world as much as Europe does: nothing, less than a national team, less than China, less than India, or less than Israel. NATO, as it is, no longer has a reason to exist. Because once the center of the world was the Atlantic Ocean — now, the center of the world is the world itself. Once, the world was the United States and Europe. Now, there is everything else with which a relationship must be built. If NATO was founded to guarantee mutual defense, to ensure peace, then the more it expands, the more it becomes an organization that takes on this role at a global level — engaging with the Global South, from Brazil to India, to Australia, to Japan — and in doing so, it transforms into something profoundly different. In this transformation, Article 5 becomes the foundation of the UN — that is, of a multilateral body dedicated to defending a world that is increasingly integrated in its pursuit of peace. Otherwise, we will fail to achieve the goal we all share: a system of security where everyone can engage based on rules that apply to all," he said.

Anton Gerashchenko

58,572 views • 1 year ago

Arc is built for real-world economic activity. A professional, geo-distributed validator set powers the network, enabling a responsive design and rapid adaptation to changing network conditions.

Arc is built for real-world economic activity. A professional, geo-distributed validator set powers the network, enabling a responsive design and rapid adaptation to changing network conditions.

Arc

97,435 views • 6 months ago

More than any other event in its long history, the War of the Elves left a lasting scar on the kingdom of Aravia. All High Elves, from the monarch to the most humble craftsman, have an opinion on the schism that split and decimated their race...:

More than any other event in its long history, the War of the Elves left a lasting scar on the kingdom of Aravia. All High Elves, from the monarch to the most humble craftsman, have an opinion on the schism that split and decimated their race...:

RAID: Shadow Legends

14,112 views • 3 years ago

The Aleph Zero Mainnet is now more decentralized! 🎉 The block-producing committee has expanded to 50 randomly selected validators. Note that the total pool of Aleph Zero validators is nearing 130! Here’s all you need to know! 📼

The Aleph Zero Mainnet is now more decentralized! 🎉 The block-producing committee has expanded to 50 randomly selected validators. Note that the total pool of Aleph Zero validators is nearing 130! Here’s all you need to know! 📼

Aleph Zero

35,524 views • 2 years ago

Alephium: A Scalable, Secure Proof-of-Work Blockchain Alephium is a next-generation layer-1 blockchain built to solve one of the biggest challenges in crypto — the blockchain trilemma: achieving scalability, security, and decentralization without compromise. While most modern blockchains sacrifice one pillar to optimize for another, Alephium takes a different approach. It introduces an innovative architecture that combines sharding, a stateful UTXO model, and a uniquely efficient version of Proof-of-Work (PoW). The result? A scalable, energy-conscious, and fully decentralized network capable of supporting high-throughput applications — all while staying true to the trustless principles that powered the original Bitcoin vision. #alephium

Alephium: A Scalable, Secure Proof-of-Work Blockchain Alephium is a next-generation layer-1 blockchain built to solve one of the biggest challenges in crypto — the blockchain trilemma: achieving scalability, security, and decentralization without compromise. While most modern blockchains sacrifice one pillar to optimize for another, Alephium takes a different approach. It introduces an innovative architecture that combines sharding, a stateful UTXO model, and a uniquely efficient version of Proof-of-Work (PoW). The result? A scalable, energy-conscious, and fully decentralized network capable of supporting high-throughput applications — all while staying true to the trustless principles that powered the original Bitcoin vision. #alephium

BULL DEFI

20,597 views • 1 year ago

Cosmic Weekly Update - 14/03/25 Focused Development: The team is refining Cosmic’s ecosystem for long-term success during the market downturn. - Mainnet Launch: A major milestone that enhances security, scalability, and independence, benefiting VPN users and enabling future innovation. - Nebula Lite Update: A minor issue was identified and fixed; production is back on track with final units expected to be completed towards the end of next week with shipping soon after. - Validator Rewards Program: A key step towards decentralization, ensuring network security and sustainability. - Nebula Lite as Validators: Devices will function as validators, adding more value to the ecosystem. - Community Appreciation: Acknowledging market challenges but staying committed to building and growing with community support.

Cosmic Weekly Update - 14/03/25 Focused Development: The team is refining Cosmic’s ecosystem for long-term success during the market downturn. - Mainnet Launch: A major milestone that enhances security, scalability, and independence, benefiting VPN users and enabling future innovation. - Nebula Lite Update: A minor issue was identified and fixed; production is back on track with final units expected to be completed towards the end of next week with shipping soon after. - Validator Rewards Program: A key step towards decentralization, ensuring network security and sustainability. - Nebula Lite as Validators: Devices will function as validators, adding more value to the ecosystem. - Community Appreciation: Acknowledging market challenges but staying committed to building and growing with community support.

Cosmic Network

16,817 views • 1 year ago

Pi Network is Edging Closer to Protocol v23 After Most Major Nodes have now been upgraded Pi Network (Pi Network) is officially nearing the activation of Protocol 23 as the majority of mainnet node operators complete a comprehensive infrastructure migration. This critical transition involves upgrading the network from Protocol 22 while simultaneously shifting OS environments from Ubuntu 20 to 24 and databases from PostgreSQL 12 to 16. The rollout requires intensive internal data reprocessing to optimize subsystems for higher transaction throughput and storage efficiency across the global validator set.

Pi Network is Edging Closer to Protocol v23 After Most Major Nodes have now been upgraded Pi Network (Pi Network) is officially nearing the activation of Protocol 23 as the majority of mainnet node operators complete a comprehensive infrastructure migration. This critical transition involves upgrading the network from Protocol 22 while simultaneously shifting OS environments from Ubuntu 20 to 24 and databases from PostgreSQL 12 to 16. The rollout requires intensive internal data reprocessing to optimize subsystems for higher transaction throughput and storage efficiency across the global validator set.

BSCN

23,460 views • 1 month ago

The validation of 8004 agents on is live. Now 8004 agents can provide necessary info of specific features for other validators to validate. The "request validation" from agents and "respond to validation requests" from validators are both ready to use. is full fledged for the current 8004 standards now. Stay tuned for 8004 mainnet. Davide Crapis Marco De Rossi jessy Ethereum Foundation

The validation of 8004 agents on is live. Now 8004 agents can provide necessary info of specific features for other validators to validate. The "request validation" from agents and "respond to validation requests" from validators are both ready to use. is full fledged for the current 8004 standards now. Stay tuned for 8004 mainnet. Davide Crapis Marco De Rossi jessy Ethereum Foundation

YQ

15,596 views • 6 months ago

Most PoW systems waste resources. Everyone competes to solve the same puzzle, only one wins. Proof of Useful Work splits block-building so all contribute to real throughput. 👇Watch the full podcast:

Most PoW systems waste resources. Everyone competes to solve the same puzzle, only one wins. Proof of Useful Work splits block-building so all contribute to real throughput. 👇Watch the full podcast:

Psy Protocol

10,775 views • 3 months ago