正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Most industries face a moment when their products cause harm. Exploding gas tanks? They redesign the gas tank. Asbestos in building materials? They remove the asbestos. That’s how accountability normally works. ICAN lead attorney Aaron Siri tells Joe Rogan how vaccines took a different path. In 1986, Congress passed...

HighWireTalk's profile picture

The HighWire

253,328 subscribers

15,265 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

“Vaccines really sit in their own little universe.” Aaron Siri shares a shocking truth with Joe Rogan: Vaccines are the only product in the world where you can’t sue if they cause serious harm. “They’re unlike any other medical product.” “Every other product that exists, I can sue the company. I can hold them accountable.” “The only products in America where you cannot sue to say, had you made that product safer, my child wouldn’t be dead or seriously injured … are childhood vaccines and child vaccines used by adults.” “It’s the only one, and that’s because of a law called the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.” Joe Rogan Aaron Siri
1:20

“Vaccines really sit in their own little universe.” Aaron Siri shares a shocking truth with Joe Rogan: Vaccines are the only product in the world where you can’t sue if they cause serious harm. “They’re unlike any other medical product.” “Every other product that exists, I can sue the company. I can hold them accountable.” “The only products in America where you cannot sue to say, had you made that product safer, my child wouldn’t be dead or seriously injured … are childhood vaccines and child vaccines used by adults.” “It’s the only one, and that’s because of a law called the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.” Joe Rogan Aaron Siri

Children’s Health Defense

17,975 次观看 • 4 个月前

AARON SIRI: “For every product on the market, you can SUE the manufacturer for harm… There’s only ONE product in America you CANNOT sue the manufacturer to claim it could have been made safer—and that’s VACCINES.” Aaron Siri explained how the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act gave pharmaceutical companies sweeping immunity—not just for three vaccines, but for every new childhood shot added since. The result? A CDC schedule that ballooned from 3 shots to 29 in the first year of life and zero liability for injuries. “They don’t have the financial incentive to make them safer,” Siri said. “In fact, they have the disincentive.”
2:33

AARON SIRI: “For every product on the market, you can SUE the manufacturer for harm… There’s only ONE product in America you CANNOT sue the manufacturer to claim it could have been made safer—and that’s VACCINES.” Aaron Siri explained how the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act gave pharmaceutical companies sweeping immunity—not just for three vaccines, but for every new childhood shot added since. The result? A CDC schedule that ballooned from 3 shots to 29 in the first year of life and zero liability for injuries. “They don’t have the financial incentive to make them safer,” Siri said. “In fact, they have the disincentive.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

306,937 次观看 • 1 年前

Aaron Siri on the Unprecedented Immunity of Vaccine Manufacturers: Vaccines are the only product in America where manufacturers cannot be sued for design defects—even if their product harms or kills. Before 1986, there were just 3 routine vaccines. The damage they caused was so severe that manufacturers were abandoning the market. Congress responded not by demanding safer products, but by granting vaccine companies absolute immunity through the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. The result? An explosion in the vaccine schedule. In the 1980s, children received 3 injections by age one. Today, they receive 29. Every new vaccine since 1986 was developed by companies knowing they’d never be held accountable for the harm their products cause. A vaccine isn’t defined by its ability to stop disease—it’s defined by the fact that it causes so much harm, it can’t survive in the marketplace without government protection from lawsuits.
2:43

Aaron Siri on the Unprecedented Immunity of Vaccine Manufacturers: Vaccines are the only product in America where manufacturers cannot be sued for design defects—even if their product harms or kills. Before 1986, there were just 3 routine vaccines. The damage they caused was so severe that manufacturers were abandoning the market. Congress responded not by demanding safer products, but by granting vaccine companies absolute immunity through the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. The result? An explosion in the vaccine schedule. In the 1980s, children received 3 injections by age one. Today, they receive 29. Every new vaccine since 1986 was developed by companies knowing they’d never be held accountable for the harm their products cause. A vaccine isn’t defined by its ability to stop disease—it’s defined by the fact that it causes so much harm, it can’t survive in the marketplace without government protection from lawsuits.

Camus

26,020 次观看 • 8 个月前

Vaccines are the only medical product in America that can’t survive on the open market without special legal immunity granted in 1986. Aaron Siri to Joe Rogan: “If they were truly as safe as claimed after 40 years and billions of doses, why do they still need that shield? Drugs with serious side effects for tiny populations survive profitably by making them as safe as possible and fully disclosing risks. Why can’t vaccines do the same?” Steel-man countered: Without immunity, frivolous lawsuits would kill innovation. Siri: Then make them safer and disclose everything — like every other drug. The fact they can’t (or won’t) after decades tells you something. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a no-fault compensation system precisely because manufacturers threatened to stop producing vaccines due to liability. That system has paid out billions while shielding companies from design-defect lawsuits. Do you think vaccines should have the same liability rules as every other drug? Or is the 1986 immunity still necessary? Your take 👇
3:21

Vaccines are the only medical product in America that can’t survive on the open market without special legal immunity granted in 1986. Aaron Siri to Joe Rogan: “If they were truly as safe as claimed after 40 years and billions of doses, why do they still need that shield? Drugs with serious side effects for tiny populations survive profitably by making them as safe as possible and fully disclosing risks. Why can’t vaccines do the same?” Steel-man countered: Without immunity, frivolous lawsuits would kill innovation. Siri: Then make them safer and disclose everything — like every other drug. The fact they can’t (or won’t) after decades tells you something. The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a no-fault compensation system precisely because manufacturers threatened to stop producing vaccines due to liability. That system has paid out billions while shielding companies from design-defect lawsuits. Do you think vaccines should have the same liability rules as every other drug? Or is the 1986 immunity still necessary? Your take 👇

Camus

20,969 次观看 • 3 个月前

Aaron Siri opened his Kennedy Center address with a fact that stops most people cold: vaccines are the only product in America where you cannot sue the manufacturer for making a safer version that could have prevented your child's death or injury. That protection came from the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Before that law, only three routine vaccines existed: MMR, DTP, and OPV. The injuries caused by those three products were so severe that every company making them either went out of business or stopped production. Every other industry facing that outcome is forced to make a safer product. Congress chose a different path for vaccines. It eliminated liability entirely, not just for those three vaccines, but for every routine childhood vaccine developed from that point forward. "No person may bring a civil action against a vaccine administrator or manufacturer for damages arising from a vaccine related injury or death." That is the foundation everything else is built on.
2:12

Aaron Siri opened his Kennedy Center address with a fact that stops most people cold: vaccines are the only product in America where you cannot sue the manufacturer for making a safer version that could have prevented your child's death or injury. That protection came from the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Before that law, only three routine vaccines existed: MMR, DTP, and OPV. The injuries caused by those three products were so severe that every company making them either went out of business or stopped production. Every other industry facing that outcome is forced to make a safer product. Congress chose a different path for vaccines. It eliminated liability entirely, not just for those three vaccines, but for every routine childhood vaccine developed from that point forward. "No person may bring a civil action against a vaccine administrator or manufacturer for damages arising from a vaccine related injury or death." That is the foundation everything else is built on.

The HighWire

52,376 次观看 • 11 天前

Joe Rogan Raises SERIOUS Questions About the Childhood Vaccine Schedule “There are so many of them. They give them to them so quickly. Like, from the moment they're born, they want to bang them up with vaccines.” What very few people know about the childhood vaccine schedule is that, in the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money. For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing about $20 to injury lawsuits. So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably” unsafe. This led to the signing of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act, which gave vaccine manufacturers special liability protections. “And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” Robert Kennedy Jr. told Joe Rogan in a previous interview.
1:37

Joe Rogan Raises SERIOUS Questions About the Childhood Vaccine Schedule “There are so many of them. They give them to them so quickly. Like, from the moment they're born, they want to bang them up with vaccines.” What very few people know about the childhood vaccine schedule is that, in the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money. For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing about $20 to injury lawsuits. So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably” unsafe. This led to the signing of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act, which gave vaccine manufacturers special liability protections. “And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” Robert Kennedy Jr. told Joe Rogan in a previous interview.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,402,052 次观看 • 1 年前

Before COVID, Joe Rogan says he mocked anti-vaxxers. Like many people, he assumed vaccines were the one area of medicine that simply couldn’t be questioned. Then the pandemic happened. The censorship. The propaganda. The pressure to conform. And Rogan says it made him stop and ask a simple question: Why would vaccines be the one product where pharmaceutical companies, regulators, and institutions are completely beyond scrutiny? That question is exactly what ICAN lead attorney Aaron Siri explores in his new book “Vaccines: Amen.” Aaron Siri explains why vaccines occupy a unique place in our culture and our legal system. Unlike any other medical product, manufacturers are protected from traditional liability under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. And culturally, questioning them has often been treated as heresy. Which is why Siri calls it what many people have quietly started to notice: “The religion of vaccines.”
1:39

Before COVID, Joe Rogan says he mocked anti-vaxxers. Like many people, he assumed vaccines were the one area of medicine that simply couldn’t be questioned. Then the pandemic happened. The censorship. The propaganda. The pressure to conform. And Rogan says it made him stop and ask a simple question: Why would vaccines be the one product where pharmaceutical companies, regulators, and institutions are completely beyond scrutiny? That question is exactly what ICAN lead attorney Aaron Siri explores in his new book “Vaccines: Amen.” Aaron Siri explains why vaccines occupy a unique place in our culture and our legal system. Unlike any other medical product, manufacturers are protected from traditional liability under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. And culturally, questioning them has often been treated as heresy. Which is why Siri calls it what many people have quietly started to notice: “The religion of vaccines.”

The HighWire

17,670 次观看 • 4 个月前

From 7 Shots to 84: The 1986 Law That Made Vaccine Makers Untouchable Attorney Aaron Siri highlights a stark legal anomaly: vaccines are the only product where the US government, via DOJ attorneys, defends the manufacturer against injured consumers in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). This system was born from a crisis. Leading up to 1986, the CDC schedule included just 3 routine childhood vaccines (DTP, OPV, MMR) totaling 7 injections. Liability from these few products was so catastrophic that it drove every manufacturer to exit the market, risking the nation's vaccine supply. Congress's response was the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. But instead of mandating safer products, the law took a different path. Siri describes the "original sin" as two-fold: 1. It allowed companies to continue selling products known to cause harm without the pressure to make them safer. 2. It granted them comprehensive legal immunity for all future vaccines. This fundamental shift, Siri argues, altered the entire landscape. It changed how clinical trials are conducted and fostered a culture where regulators see themselves as "partners with manufacturers." The result of this protected, liability-free market? A childhood schedule that has ballooned from 3 vaccines and 7 injections to 19 vaccines and 84 injections. The law designed to save the vaccine supply may have also removed the core incentive for safety innovation, fueling an unprecedented expansion.
1:28

From 7 Shots to 84: The 1986 Law That Made Vaccine Makers Untouchable Attorney Aaron Siri highlights a stark legal anomaly: vaccines are the only product where the US government, via DOJ attorneys, defends the manufacturer against injured consumers in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). This system was born from a crisis. Leading up to 1986, the CDC schedule included just 3 routine childhood vaccines (DTP, OPV, MMR) totaling 7 injections. Liability from these few products was so catastrophic that it drove every manufacturer to exit the market, risking the nation's vaccine supply. Congress's response was the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. But instead of mandating safer products, the law took a different path. Siri describes the "original sin" as two-fold: 1. It allowed companies to continue selling products known to cause harm without the pressure to make them safer. 2. It granted them comprehensive legal immunity for all future vaccines. This fundamental shift, Siri argues, altered the entire landscape. It changed how clinical trials are conducted and fostered a culture where regulators see themselves as "partners with manufacturers." The result of this protected, liability-free market? A childhood schedule that has ballooned from 3 vaccines and 7 injections to 19 vaccines and 84 injections. The law designed to save the vaccine supply may have also removed the core incentive for safety innovation, fueling an unprecedented expansion.

Camus

38,411 次观看 • 7 个月前

Joe Rogan Drops Great Question “Isn’t it weird that you can just lie to people, and you could force people to take things, and you could hide the side effects, and you can’t sue them?” Vaccines are the ONLY product that you can’t sue the manufacturers directly. This is because, in the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money. For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing about $20 to injury lawsuits. So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” This led to the signing of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act, which gave vaccine manufacturers special liability protections. “And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr told Joe Rogan in a previous interview.
1:05

Joe Rogan Drops Great Question “Isn’t it weird that you can just lie to people, and you could force people to take things, and you could hide the side effects, and you can’t sue them?” Vaccines are the ONLY product that you can’t sue the manufacturers directly. This is because, in the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money. For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing about $20 to injury lawsuits. So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” This led to the signing of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act, which gave vaccine manufacturers special liability protections. “And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr told Joe Rogan in a previous interview.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

2,374,582 次观看 • 2 年前

Lawyer Aaron Siri is asking questions at the ACIP hearing that millions of parents have been asking for years about Big Pharma’s vaccine-injury liability shield. “Why do we need the 1986 act if vaccines are so safe?” “Why does a product need immunity if it doesn’t cause harm?” “And why do products that have been on the market for decades, like the Hepatitis B vaccine, still need that immunity?” “Do we still not know if they’re safe enough to lift the immunity on those products?”
1:25

Lawyer Aaron Siri is asking questions at the ACIP hearing that millions of parents have been asking for years about Big Pharma’s vaccine-injury liability shield. “Why do we need the 1986 act if vaccines are so safe?” “Why does a product need immunity if it doesn’t cause harm?” “And why do products that have been on the market for decades, like the Hepatitis B vaccine, still need that immunity?” “Do we still not know if they’re safe enough to lift the immunity on those products?”

MAHA Action

16,962 次观看 • 7 个月前

RFK Jr. Reveals the Shocking Reason Why Vaccine Makers Are Shielded from Liability After getting hammered with lawsuits over the DTP vaccine, Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to President Reagan with a warning: give us legal protection, or we’ll stop making vaccines. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. And Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” And that phrase—“unavoidably unsafe”—was written in the preamble of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) in 1986 when Congress passed the law to protect vaccine manufacturers from injury lawsuits. “And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” revealed Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
1:14

RFK Jr. Reveals the Shocking Reason Why Vaccine Makers Are Shielded from Liability After getting hammered with lawsuits over the DTP vaccine, Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to President Reagan with a warning: give us legal protection, or we’ll stop making vaccines. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. And Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” And that phrase—“unavoidably unsafe”—was written in the preamble of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) in 1986 when Congress passed the law to protect vaccine manufacturers from injury lawsuits. “And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” revealed Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

636,564 次观看 • 1 年前

Joe Rogan Drops Stunning Question on Big Pharma “Isn’t it weird that you can just lie to people, and you could force people to take things, and you could hide the side effects, and you can’t sue them?” It's true. You can’t sue vaccine manufacturers directly. This is because, in the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money. For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing about $20 to injury lawsuits. So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” This led to the signing of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act, which gave vaccine manufacturers special liability protections. “And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” Robert Kennedy Jr. told Joe Rogan in a previous interview.
3:57

Joe Rogan Drops Stunning Question on Big Pharma “Isn’t it weird that you can just lie to people, and you could force people to take things, and you could hide the side effects, and you can’t sue them?” It's true. You can’t sue vaccine manufacturers directly. This is because, in the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money. For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing about $20 to injury lawsuits. So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” This led to the signing of the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act, which gave vaccine manufacturers special liability protections. “And so, anybody who tells you vaccines are safe and effective, the industry itself got immunity from liability by convincing the President and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe,” Robert Kennedy Jr. told Joe Rogan in a previous interview.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

927,421 次观看 • 2 年前

In the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money. For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing $20 to injury lawsuits. So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act was then signed, which turned vaccines into a "dream product." Here's why: #1 - There's no liability, therefore no incentive to perform safety testing. #2 - No liability means no injury lawsuits, which means big savings for the vaccine manufacturers. #3 - The need for advertising and marketing is also eliminated because the products are mandated for kids to go to school. "If you could get your vaccine onto the CDC mandatory schedule. It's worth about a billion dollars in profit to your company for every vaccine every year," denoted Robert F. Kennedy Jr Repost and follow for more informative content. Related stories are attached in the thread below.
2:47

In the early 1980s, vaccine manufacturers were losing BIG money. For every $1 they made off the DTP vaccine, they were losing $20 to injury lawsuits. So Wyeth (now Pfizer) went to the Reagan White House and demanded liability protections with the threat of getting out of the vaccine business. President Reagan asked Wyeth why they couldn’t make safer vaccines. Wyeth answered that they couldn’t because vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act was then signed, which turned vaccines into a "dream product." Here's why: #1 - There's no liability, therefore no incentive to perform safety testing. #2 - No liability means no injury lawsuits, which means big savings for the vaccine manufacturers. #3 - The need for advertising and marketing is also eliminated because the products are mandated for kids to go to school. "If you could get your vaccine onto the CDC mandatory schedule. It's worth about a billion dollars in profit to your company for every vaccine every year," denoted Robert F. Kennedy Jr Repost and follow for more informative content. Related stories are attached in the thread below.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

889,941 次观看 • 2 年前

"You need to give 7 million Hepatitis B vaccines to prevent 1 death" HHS Sec. RFK Jr: "Vaccines are the only medical intervention [that] are exempt from pre licensing safety studies" Aaron Siri: "Why do we need the 1986 act if vaccines are so safe and effective? Why does a product need immunity if it doesn't cause harm? Why do products that have been on the market for decades, like the hepatitis B vaccine, still need immunity?"
1:02

"You need to give 7 million Hepatitis B vaccines to prevent 1 death" HHS Sec. RFK Jr: "Vaccines are the only medical intervention [that] are exempt from pre licensing safety studies" Aaron Siri: "Why do we need the 1986 act if vaccines are so safe and effective? Why does a product need immunity if it doesn't cause harm? Why do products that have been on the market for decades, like the hepatitis B vaccine, still need immunity?"

Humanspective

175,808 次观看 • 7 个月前

Vaccine Makers Admitted Vaccines Are Inherently Unsafe—So the Reagan Administration Gave Them Legal Immunity (Bret Weinstein on Joe Rogan) In a revelatory conversation on The Joe Rogan Experience, Bret Weinstein laid out the stunning backstory: Vaccine manufacturers admitted to the Reagan administration that their products were too risky to produce without legal protection. Their solution? A sweeping deal in 1986 that granted them total immunity from lawsuits. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act didn’t just create VAERS and a special court for injury claims—it removed all accountability. Weinstein and Rogan connected the dots: With no fear of lawsuits, pharmaceutical companies could expand the childhood vaccine schedule aggressively, injecting infants with an unprecedented number of doses from birth. The public was sold a story of safety and necessity, but the fine print told a different story: If vaccines were truly safe, why did manufacturers demand legal immunity? The answer, they argued, is profit. Without liability, there’s no incentive to prioritize safety over scale. And when mRNA technology arrived, it was marketed as a breakthrough under the trusted “vaccine” label—even though many rely on adjuvants that hyperactivate the immune system, potentially causing lifelong sensitivities. Yet, none of this is part of the public conversation. This isn’t about rejecting vaccines. It’s about facing an uncomfortable truth: A system built on legal immunity is a system that prioritizes corporate interests over public health. The Reagan administration’s deal didn’t just protect pharma—it set the stage for decades of unchecked expansion, where dissent is silenced and history is erased. The question we should all be asking: If vaccines are as safe as we’re told, why did they need legal protection in the first place?
2:48

Vaccine Makers Admitted Vaccines Are Inherently Unsafe—So the Reagan Administration Gave Them Legal Immunity (Bret Weinstein on Joe Rogan) In a revelatory conversation on The Joe Rogan Experience, Bret Weinstein laid out the stunning backstory: Vaccine manufacturers admitted to the Reagan administration that their products were too risky to produce without legal protection. Their solution? A sweeping deal in 1986 that granted them total immunity from lawsuits. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act didn’t just create VAERS and a special court for injury claims—it removed all accountability. Weinstein and Rogan connected the dots: With no fear of lawsuits, pharmaceutical companies could expand the childhood vaccine schedule aggressively, injecting infants with an unprecedented number of doses from birth. The public was sold a story of safety and necessity, but the fine print told a different story: If vaccines were truly safe, why did manufacturers demand legal immunity? The answer, they argued, is profit. Without liability, there’s no incentive to prioritize safety over scale. And when mRNA technology arrived, it was marketed as a breakthrough under the trusted “vaccine” label—even though many rely on adjuvants that hyperactivate the immune system, potentially causing lifelong sensitivities. Yet, none of this is part of the public conversation. This isn’t about rejecting vaccines. It’s about facing an uncomfortable truth: A system built on legal immunity is a system that prioritizes corporate interests over public health. The Reagan administration’s deal didn’t just protect pharma—it set the stage for decades of unchecked expansion, where dissent is silenced and history is erased. The question we should all be asking: If vaccines are as safe as we’re told, why did they need legal protection in the first place?

Camus

41,165 次观看 • 8 个月前

Civil rights attorney Aaron Siri explains why vaccines are the only product in America that cannot self-correct through the market. When companies can be sued, dangerous products get safer. Vaccines are different. Legal immunity removes accountability and forces parents to do their own research before making irreversible decisions for their children. Lara Logan notes how deeply we trust doctors. Aaron clarifies the problem. Most doctors are not lying. They are not given the full information. The real vaccine debate isn’t on TV. It’s in sworn depositions with Aaron, including nine hours questioning leading vaccinologist Stanley Plotkin. Aaron Siri Going Rogue with Lara Logan EP. 50 UNINFORMED CONSENT Watch Full Episode Below. ⬇️ #GoingRogue #AaronSiri #UninformedConsent #MedicalFreedom #InvestigativeJournalism
3:18

Civil rights attorney Aaron Siri explains why vaccines are the only product in America that cannot self-correct through the market. When companies can be sued, dangerous products get safer. Vaccines are different. Legal immunity removes accountability and forces parents to do their own research before making irreversible decisions for their children. Lara Logan notes how deeply we trust doctors. Aaron clarifies the problem. Most doctors are not lying. They are not given the full information. The real vaccine debate isn’t on TV. It’s in sworn depositions with Aaron, including nine hours questioning leading vaccinologist Stanley Plotkin. Aaron Siri Going Rogue with Lara Logan EP. 50 UNINFORMED CONSENT Watch Full Episode Below. ⬇️ #GoingRogue #AaronSiri #UninformedConsent #MedicalFreedom #InvestigativeJournalism

Lara Logan

22,717 次观看 • 7 个月前

Facts on facts: Aaron Siri delivers major TRUTH BOMBS at last week's ACIP meeting. “Why do we need the 1986 act if vaccines are so safe?” “When you take away somebody's right, you have made it, no longer just a medical question. You've made it a legal one, you've made it a political one.” “Why does a product need immunity if it doesn't cause harm?” “There's probably a reason that this immunity still needs to continue for these products, and pretending that that reason doesn't exist is not going to make the problem any better. And it's not going to safeguard the kids that are injured by these products.” Aaron Siri
1:56

Facts on facts: Aaron Siri delivers major TRUTH BOMBS at last week's ACIP meeting. “Why do we need the 1986 act if vaccines are so safe?” “When you take away somebody's right, you have made it, no longer just a medical question. You've made it a legal one, you've made it a political one.” “Why does a product need immunity if it doesn't cause harm?” “There's probably a reason that this immunity still needs to continue for these products, and pretending that that reason doesn't exist is not going to make the problem any better. And it's not going to safeguard the kids that are injured by these products.” Aaron Siri

Children’s Health Defense

19,385 次观看 • 7 个月前

📣 Attorney Aaron Siri GOES OFF: The PREP Act lets Pharma make BILLIONS from vaccines with ZERO accountability. “The PREP Act is a federal law that provides that … the Secretary of HHS, if they declare an emergency, they can also grant immunity.” “[Immunity] to any products developed to counteract that emergency.” “So if you go and you create a vaccine to counteract the emergency of Covid-19 … nobody can sue you if that vaccine causes an injury.” “No matter how unsafe, no matter pretty much anything you've done.” “They knew that their path to earn billions of dollars [was there].” “Safety issues that they brought up [weren’t] going to stop them from getting there.” “And they didn't have to worry about liability afterwards.” “That creates a horrible moral hazard, and it inverts the normal economic incentives that assure safety.” “And it's still in effect today, even though clearly there's no longer an emergency.” “In fact, right before the Biden administration ended, that immunity was extended for numerous years into the future.” Aaron Siri Dr. Drew
1:43

📣 Attorney Aaron Siri GOES OFF: The PREP Act lets Pharma make BILLIONS from vaccines with ZERO accountability. “The PREP Act is a federal law that provides that … the Secretary of HHS, if they declare an emergency, they can also grant immunity.” “[Immunity] to any products developed to counteract that emergency.” “So if you go and you create a vaccine to counteract the emergency of Covid-19 … nobody can sue you if that vaccine causes an injury.” “No matter how unsafe, no matter pretty much anything you've done.” “They knew that their path to earn billions of dollars [was there].” “Safety issues that they brought up [weren’t] going to stop them from getting there.” “And they didn't have to worry about liability afterwards.” “That creates a horrible moral hazard, and it inverts the normal economic incentives that assure safety.” “And it's still in effect today, even though clearly there's no longer an emergency.” “In fact, right before the Biden administration ended, that immunity was extended for numerous years into the future.” Aaron Siri Dr. Drew

Children’s Health Defense

23,910 次观看 • 5 个月前

In 1986, a one-year-old child received 3 vaccine injections. Today, that number has skyrocketed to 29. This exponential increase hasn't occurred in a vacuum; it's happened within a system deliberately engineered to remove corporate liability and critical oversight. As highlighted in a recent discussion, the core of the issue is a fundamental divergence in how products are regulated. For pharmaceuticals, companies face massive financial and legal repercussions for unsafe products. This necessitates rigorous, long-term, placebo-controlled trials. But for vaccines, the landscape is entirely different. As legal expert Aaron Siri often outlines, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a paradigm shift. Vaccine manufacturers were granted a critical shield: they would no longer be liable for injuries caused by their products. This changed everything. The incentive structure was flipped. Without the threat of class-action lawsuits or product liability claims—the primary drivers of corporate accountability in every other industry—what kind of safety trials were conducted? The answer, as detailed in numerous analyses, is trials that are profoundly inadequate: - Duration: Days or weeks of safety review. - Design: No true placebo controls. - Scale: Insufficient numbers of children to detect rarer, long-term adverse events. For 40 years, this industry has operated with virtually no meaningful pushback. When your car or a child's car seat has a defect, you hear about it because of massive legal action. That signal is silenced for vaccines. So, who is minding the ship? The two traditional guardians of public safety are both compromised: 1. The Legal System: Class-action attorneys have been entirely neutered by the 1986 law. 2. Federal Health Agencies: These bodies are caught in an irreconcilable conflict of interest. They are tasked with both promoting vaccination and defending vaccines in the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). They are, in effect, the cheerleader and the judge for the same product. The result is a system that operates on pure economic and bureaucratic momentum. Pharmaceutical companies, like any good business, promote their products through trusted intermediaries. There is no conspiracy—only a system operating exactly as designed, with conflicts of interest baked into its foundation. Understanding this framework—the lack of liability, the weakened trials, the neutered legal system, and the conflicted regulators—is key to demystifying the last four decades of vaccine policy. It’s not about the science; it’s about the structure.
1:55

In 1986, a one-year-old child received 3 vaccine injections. Today, that number has skyrocketed to 29. This exponential increase hasn't occurred in a vacuum; it's happened within a system deliberately engineered to remove corporate liability and critical oversight. As highlighted in a recent discussion, the core of the issue is a fundamental divergence in how products are regulated. For pharmaceuticals, companies face massive financial and legal repercussions for unsafe products. This necessitates rigorous, long-term, placebo-controlled trials. But for vaccines, the landscape is entirely different. As legal expert Aaron Siri often outlines, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act created a paradigm shift. Vaccine manufacturers were granted a critical shield: they would no longer be liable for injuries caused by their products. This changed everything. The incentive structure was flipped. Without the threat of class-action lawsuits or product liability claims—the primary drivers of corporate accountability in every other industry—what kind of safety trials were conducted? The answer, as detailed in numerous analyses, is trials that are profoundly inadequate: - Duration: Days or weeks of safety review. - Design: No true placebo controls. - Scale: Insufficient numbers of children to detect rarer, long-term adverse events. For 40 years, this industry has operated with virtually no meaningful pushback. When your car or a child's car seat has a defect, you hear about it because of massive legal action. That signal is silenced for vaccines. So, who is minding the ship? The two traditional guardians of public safety are both compromised: 1. The Legal System: Class-action attorneys have been entirely neutered by the 1986 law. 2. Federal Health Agencies: These bodies are caught in an irreconcilable conflict of interest. They are tasked with both promoting vaccination and defending vaccines in the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). They are, in effect, the cheerleader and the judge for the same product. The result is a system that operates on pure economic and bureaucratic momentum. Pharmaceutical companies, like any good business, promote their products through trusted intermediaries. There is no conspiracy—only a system operating exactly as designed, with conflicts of interest baked into its foundation. Understanding this framework—the lack of liability, the weakened trials, the neutered legal system, and the conflicted regulators—is key to demystifying the last four decades of vaccine policy. It’s not about the science; it’s about the structure.

Camus

103,492 次观看 • 8 个月前

RFK Jr. Drops a Bombshell: “The Autism Spike Began in 1989 — Right After Pharma Got Legal Immunity for Vaccines” RFK Jr. says the EPA, not the CDC or FDA, identified 1989 as the year autism rates exploded—and that moment wasn’t random. Three years earlier, Congress passed the 1986 Vaccine Act, granting vaccine makers full legal immunity for vaccines. No lawsuits. No accountability. Overnight, every barrier—testing costs, legal risks, marketing expenses—disappeared. What followed was a pharmaceutical gold rush. With mandatory schedules guaranteeing millions of customers, new vaccines poured in for everything from rotavirus to hepatitis B—even conditions that aren't contagious. RFK Jr. frames it bluntly: 1989 marked the year public health stopped being about health—and became about profit.
1:54

RFK Jr. Drops a Bombshell: “The Autism Spike Began in 1989 — Right After Pharma Got Legal Immunity for Vaccines” RFK Jr. says the EPA, not the CDC or FDA, identified 1989 as the year autism rates exploded—and that moment wasn’t random. Three years earlier, Congress passed the 1986 Vaccine Act, granting vaccine makers full legal immunity for vaccines. No lawsuits. No accountability. Overnight, every barrier—testing costs, legal risks, marketing expenses—disappeared. What followed was a pharmaceutical gold rush. With mandatory schedules guaranteeing millions of customers, new vaccines poured in for everything from rotavirus to hepatitis B—even conditions that aren't contagious. RFK Jr. frames it bluntly: 1989 marked the year public health stopped being about health—and became about profit.

Camus

465,959 次观看 • 8 个月前