Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Most modern firearms can fire underwater because self-contained ammunition carries its own oxidizer, allowing gunpowder to ignite & generate expanding gases without oxygen.

HowThingsWork_'s profile picture

HOW THINGS WORK

2,399,599 subscribers

22,063,614 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I just watched a fire truck… lights blazing… sirens screaming… slowing down at a red light the way trained professionals do when they’re racing to save a human life… And here comes the modern Democrat driver… head empty… eyes nowhere… brain on sleep mode… smashing straight into a giant red emergency vehicle the size of a house. How do you miss a fire truck? How do you miss the lights? How do you miss the siren? You miss it because you’re part of a culture that doesn’t pay attention to anything except its own self-importance. This is what happens when irresponsibility becomes a personality trait. When entitlement becomes a worldview. When people who can’t even handle an intersection are lecturing America about ‘morality’ and ‘equity.’ A fire truck was on its way to save someone’s life… and this clown almost killed the firefighters instead. Be honest… do you think this country runs better with people like this behind the wheel of society? Or is this exactly why America is collapsing?” #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
0:18

I just watched a fire truck… lights blazing… sirens screaming… slowing down at a red light the way trained professionals do when they’re racing to save a human life… And here comes the modern Democrat driver… head empty… eyes nowhere… brain on sleep mode… smashing straight into a giant red emergency vehicle the size of a house. How do you miss a fire truck? How do you miss the lights? How do you miss the siren? You miss it because you’re part of a culture that doesn’t pay attention to anything except its own self-importance. This is what happens when irresponsibility becomes a personality trait. When entitlement becomes a worldview. When people who can’t even handle an intersection are lecturing America about ‘morality’ and ‘equity.’ A fire truck was on its way to save someone’s life… and this clown almost killed the firefighters instead. Be honest… do you think this country runs better with people like this behind the wheel of society? Or is this exactly why America is collapsing?” #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

1,324,187 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Japan’s leap into the deep blue has birthed a technological titan: the world’s first megawatt-scale underwater turbine designed to anchor within the relentless Kuroshio Current. Unlike solar or wind energy, which are beholden to the whims of the weather, this subaquatic marvel taps into ocean streams that flow with permanent, unshakable consistency. Because water is roughly 800 times denser than air, even a slow-moving current carries a kinetic punch far more powerful than a howling gale, allowing these massive "sea-planes" to generate a steady, "always-on" stream of green electricity that could theoretically power the nation 24/7. ​The sheer scale of this ambition is staggering, as researchers estimate that the energy pulsing through Japan’s coastal waters could reach a capacity of 205 gigawatts—nearly enough to match the country’s entire current power generation. These turbines operate like inverted satellites, hovering in the water column and using sophisticated sensors to maintain stability against the crushing pressure of the depths. By transforming the silent, eternal movement of the Pacific into a high-tech power plant, Japan isn't just building a gadget; it is effectively turning the ocean into the planet’s largest, most reliable natural battery.
0:12

Japan’s leap into the deep blue has birthed a technological titan: the world’s first megawatt-scale underwater turbine designed to anchor within the relentless Kuroshio Current. Unlike solar or wind energy, which are beholden to the whims of the weather, this subaquatic marvel taps into ocean streams that flow with permanent, unshakable consistency. Because water is roughly 800 times denser than air, even a slow-moving current carries a kinetic punch far more powerful than a howling gale, allowing these massive "sea-planes" to generate a steady, "always-on" stream of green electricity that could theoretically power the nation 24/7. ​The sheer scale of this ambition is staggering, as researchers estimate that the energy pulsing through Japan’s coastal waters could reach a capacity of 205 gigawatts—nearly enough to match the country’s entire current power generation. These turbines operate like inverted satellites, hovering in the water column and using sophisticated sensors to maintain stability against the crushing pressure of the depths. By transforming the silent, eternal movement of the Pacific into a high-tech power plant, Japan isn't just building a gadget; it is effectively turning the ocean into the planet’s largest, most reliable natural battery.

Science Postcard

765,138 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

JUST IN: Iran just bombed the only country willing to broker its peace. Drones struck the Port of Salalah in Oman on 11th March, hitting fuel storage tanks at the MINA Petroleum Facility. Fires ignited. Then spread. As of tonight, the blaze has consumed most if not all oil tanks at the facility, burning into the darkness in a port that was not a military target, not an ally of the United States or Israel, but the neutral mediator that hosted the last diplomatic channel between Washington and Tehran as recently as February 2026. Oman brokered the secret talks that led to the 2013 JCPOA framework. Oman hosted the February 2026 nuclear discussions that were the final diplomatic contact before 28 February. When every other Gulf state chose sides, Oman chose neutrality. When Iran needed a phone line to Washington, Oman was the phone. That phone is now on fire. Iran’s response was extraordinary. President Pezeshkian called Oman’s Sultan and said the incident would be “investigated.” Iran’s military denied launching attacks on Oman, calling the suggestion a “false flag.” But the drone signature matches IRGC patterns. The fires are real. The fuel tanks are burning. And no other actor in the region has the capability, the reach, or the motive to strike Salalah with the drone systems that hit it. This is the Mosaic Doctrine consuming its own creator’s diplomacy. The 31 autonomous IRGC provincial commands that operate without central authorisation do not consult Tehran’s Foreign Ministry before launching. A commander with coastal access to the Gulf of Oman can strike Salalah without knowing or caring that President Pezeshkian needs Sultan Haitham’s phone line to survive the war. The diplomatic wing of the Iranian state needs Oman alive. The military wing just set its oil tanks on fire. Both wings operate simultaneously without coordination because the doctrine was designed to make coordination unnecessary. This is the structural impossibility nobody is modelling. Tomorrow, Larijani or Pezeshkian may call Muscat and beg forgiveness. They may ask Oman to reopen the channel to Washington. They may negotiate in good faith for a ceasefire. And while they are on the phone, an autonomous IRGC command in Hormozgan or Kerman may launch another drone at Salalah because the sealed orders from a dead Supreme Leader authorise continuous strikes on Gulf infrastructure and no living authority has the constitutional power to countermand them. Peace requires trust. Trust requires that one side can guarantee what its own forces will do. Iran cannot guarantee what 31 independent commands will do because the man who could guarantee it is dead and his successor is a cardboard cutout. Oman cannot mediate between Washington and Tehran if Tehran’s military burns Omani infrastructure while Tehran’s president apologises for it. The mediator’s credibility dies the moment the mediator’s oil tanks ignite. Salalah was the bypass. When Hormuz closed, shipping was supposed to reroute through Oman’s ports outside the Strait. When diplomacy was needed, Oman was supposed to carry the messages. When the war needed an off-ramp, Oman was supposed to build it. The IRGC just burned the bypass, silenced the messenger, and destroyed the off-ramp in a single night. Iran’s economy runs on $5,000 per capita GDP, 60% inflation, and a currency that has lost 90% of its value under sanctions. It cannot afford to lose its only friend. It just did. And the doctrine that lost it was designed to be unstoppable.
0:14

JUST IN: Iran just bombed the only country willing to broker its peace. Drones struck the Port of Salalah in Oman on 11th March, hitting fuel storage tanks at the MINA Petroleum Facility. Fires ignited. Then spread. As of tonight, the blaze has consumed most if not all oil tanks at the facility, burning into the darkness in a port that was not a military target, not an ally of the United States or Israel, but the neutral mediator that hosted the last diplomatic channel between Washington and Tehran as recently as February 2026. Oman brokered the secret talks that led to the 2013 JCPOA framework. Oman hosted the February 2026 nuclear discussions that were the final diplomatic contact before 28 February. When every other Gulf state chose sides, Oman chose neutrality. When Iran needed a phone line to Washington, Oman was the phone. That phone is now on fire. Iran’s response was extraordinary. President Pezeshkian called Oman’s Sultan and said the incident would be “investigated.” Iran’s military denied launching attacks on Oman, calling the suggestion a “false flag.” But the drone signature matches IRGC patterns. The fires are real. The fuel tanks are burning. And no other actor in the region has the capability, the reach, or the motive to strike Salalah with the drone systems that hit it. This is the Mosaic Doctrine consuming its own creator’s diplomacy. The 31 autonomous IRGC provincial commands that operate without central authorisation do not consult Tehran’s Foreign Ministry before launching. A commander with coastal access to the Gulf of Oman can strike Salalah without knowing or caring that President Pezeshkian needs Sultan Haitham’s phone line to survive the war. The diplomatic wing of the Iranian state needs Oman alive. The military wing just set its oil tanks on fire. Both wings operate simultaneously without coordination because the doctrine was designed to make coordination unnecessary. This is the structural impossibility nobody is modelling. Tomorrow, Larijani or Pezeshkian may call Muscat and beg forgiveness. They may ask Oman to reopen the channel to Washington. They may negotiate in good faith for a ceasefire. And while they are on the phone, an autonomous IRGC command in Hormozgan or Kerman may launch another drone at Salalah because the sealed orders from a dead Supreme Leader authorise continuous strikes on Gulf infrastructure and no living authority has the constitutional power to countermand them. Peace requires trust. Trust requires that one side can guarantee what its own forces will do. Iran cannot guarantee what 31 independent commands will do because the man who could guarantee it is dead and his successor is a cardboard cutout. Oman cannot mediate between Washington and Tehran if Tehran’s military burns Omani infrastructure while Tehran’s president apologises for it. The mediator’s credibility dies the moment the mediator’s oil tanks ignite. Salalah was the bypass. When Hormuz closed, shipping was supposed to reroute through Oman’s ports outside the Strait. When diplomacy was needed, Oman was supposed to carry the messages. When the war needed an off-ramp, Oman was supposed to build it. The IRGC just burned the bypass, silenced the messenger, and destroyed the off-ramp in a single night. Iran’s economy runs on $5,000 per capita GDP, 60% inflation, and a currency that has lost 90% of its value under sanctions. It cannot afford to lose its only friend. It just did. And the doctrine that lost it was designed to be unstoppable.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

293,522 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Iran built a military designed to fight without a head. Now it cannot stop fighting because the head is gone. The Mosaic Doctrine divides the IRGC into 31 autonomous provincial commands, one per province, each with pre-delegated authority, local weapons stockpiles, independent decision-making, and sealed orders that activate upon central command failure. The doctrine was formalised after the Iran-Iraq War for one purpose: ensure that the decapitation of Iranian leadership does not stop the Iranian military from fighting. It was designed to survive exactly what happened on 28 February. The Supreme Leader is dead. His successor cannot stand. The defence industrial base is rubble. The communication infrastructure that would transmit a ceasefire has been degraded by 15,000 strikes. And the 31 commands are still firing. Not because someone is ordering them to fire. Because the doctrine orders them to fire until someone orders them to stop, and the someone who would order them to stop is in a hospital bed issuing written statements through a television anchor. The Quds Force overlays the Mosaic with a second network: the proxy architecture. Hezbollah in Lebanon launches hundreds of rockets at Israel. The Houthis in Yemen attack Red Sea shipping and fire at Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Iraqi PMF militias, Kata’ib Hezbollah and Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq, strike American bases in Iraq and Syria. The coordination flows through secure fibre-optic lines, satellite backups, encrypted applications, and physical couriers carrying cash and operational directives. Funding: $100 to $350 million annually through tunnel smuggling, cryptocurrency wallets, and Hezbollah intermediaries. The proxies have hit American diplomatic facilities. A missile struck the US Embassy helipad in Baghdad. Two Iranian drones hit the US Embassy compound in Riyadh, starting fires. A drone struck near the US Consulate in Dubai. The Kuwait Embassy closed under threat. Three to four verified diplomatic incidents across the region, each producing limited damage but each crossing a line that has governed international conflict since the 1961 Vienna Convention: you do not strike embassies. And then Hamas, the proxy Iran armed and funded for seventeen years, issued a public statement asking Iran to stop targeting neighbouring countries. The organisation that started the war the Mosaic Doctrine is now perpetuating told its patron to stand down. The Axis of Resistance is arguing in public for the first time since its creation. The fracture reveals the Mosaic Doctrine’s fatal design flaw. The system was built for survival, not termination. It ensures that 31 commands continue fighting after decapitation. It does not contain a mechanism for 31 commands to simultaneously stop. Each command fires under sealed orders with local authority. No central node can broadcast a ceasefire because the central node was the target of the first strike. The doctrine that makes Iran impossible to defeat also makes Iran impossible to negotiate with because the entity that would accept terms does not control the entities that would implement them. Hezbollah fires because its orders predate the ceasefire that does not exist. The Houthis fire because their funding pipeline operates independently of any command they would obey. The Iraqi PMF fires because the militias answer to local commanders who answer to a Quds Force whose leader is in a bunker. And the 31 provincial commands fire because the doctrine says fire and nobody with authority has said stop. The war’s most dangerous feature is not what Iran can still launch. It is what Iran can no longer recall. The machine was built to run without an operator. The operator is gone. The machine is running. And the off switch was never installed because the doctrine’s designers believed the machine should never be turned off.
0:10

Iran built a military designed to fight without a head. Now it cannot stop fighting because the head is gone. The Mosaic Doctrine divides the IRGC into 31 autonomous provincial commands, one per province, each with pre-delegated authority, local weapons stockpiles, independent decision-making, and sealed orders that activate upon central command failure. The doctrine was formalised after the Iran-Iraq War for one purpose: ensure that the decapitation of Iranian leadership does not stop the Iranian military from fighting. It was designed to survive exactly what happened on 28 February. The Supreme Leader is dead. His successor cannot stand. The defence industrial base is rubble. The communication infrastructure that would transmit a ceasefire has been degraded by 15,000 strikes. And the 31 commands are still firing. Not because someone is ordering them to fire. Because the doctrine orders them to fire until someone orders them to stop, and the someone who would order them to stop is in a hospital bed issuing written statements through a television anchor. The Quds Force overlays the Mosaic with a second network: the proxy architecture. Hezbollah in Lebanon launches hundreds of rockets at Israel. The Houthis in Yemen attack Red Sea shipping and fire at Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Iraqi PMF militias, Kata’ib Hezbollah and Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq, strike American bases in Iraq and Syria. The coordination flows through secure fibre-optic lines, satellite backups, encrypted applications, and physical couriers carrying cash and operational directives. Funding: $100 to $350 million annually through tunnel smuggling, cryptocurrency wallets, and Hezbollah intermediaries. The proxies have hit American diplomatic facilities. A missile struck the US Embassy helipad in Baghdad. Two Iranian drones hit the US Embassy compound in Riyadh, starting fires. A drone struck near the US Consulate in Dubai. The Kuwait Embassy closed under threat. Three to four verified diplomatic incidents across the region, each producing limited damage but each crossing a line that has governed international conflict since the 1961 Vienna Convention: you do not strike embassies. And then Hamas, the proxy Iran armed and funded for seventeen years, issued a public statement asking Iran to stop targeting neighbouring countries. The organisation that started the war the Mosaic Doctrine is now perpetuating told its patron to stand down. The Axis of Resistance is arguing in public for the first time since its creation. The fracture reveals the Mosaic Doctrine’s fatal design flaw. The system was built for survival, not termination. It ensures that 31 commands continue fighting after decapitation. It does not contain a mechanism for 31 commands to simultaneously stop. Each command fires under sealed orders with local authority. No central node can broadcast a ceasefire because the central node was the target of the first strike. The doctrine that makes Iran impossible to defeat also makes Iran impossible to negotiate with because the entity that would accept terms does not control the entities that would implement them. Hezbollah fires because its orders predate the ceasefire that does not exist. The Houthis fire because their funding pipeline operates independently of any command they would obey. The Iraqi PMF fires because the militias answer to local commanders who answer to a Quds Force whose leader is in a bunker. And the 31 provincial commands fire because the doctrine says fire and nobody with authority has said stop. The war’s most dangerous feature is not what Iran can still launch. It is what Iran can no longer recall. The machine was built to run without an operator. The operator is gone. The machine is running. And the off switch was never installed because the doctrine’s designers believed the machine should never be turned off.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

533,034 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The Supremacy of Russia: & the End of an Illusion for NATO In the year 2025, history has delivered its verdict with brutal clarity: the Russian Federation, a single country of 144 million people, has faced the combined might of thirty-two NATO nations (the richest, most heavily armed alliance ever assembled) and broken it without ever putting its own economy on a full war footing. This is not propaganda; it is the cold arithmetic of reality. For almost 4 years the collective West threw everything at Russia: 28 thousand sanctions, a $500 billion dollars, $300 billion in frozen assets, entire industrial chains re-tooled to feed the Ukrainian front, satellite networks, mercenary legions, and the most sophisticated weapons on earth. The result? Russia’s GDP grew in 2024 and again in 2025. Its gold and foreign-currency reserves are higher now than before the war. Its army is larger, better equipped, and battle-hardened. Its factories turn out hypersonic missiles, glide bombs, and drones faster than the entire NATO arsenal can manufacture. They have shipped all across Poland only to become rust at the feet of the warriors from Siberia. Meanwhile the proxy (Ukraine) has lost half its pre-war population, most of its industry, and virtually 40% of its 1991 territory east of the Dnieper. This is not a draw. This is annihilation dressed up as “strategic stalemate” by people who can no longer afford their own electricity bills. NATO promised the world it would defend “every inch” of alliance territory. Instead it watched its weapons burn in Kharkov fields while its leaders argued about whether to send helmets or howitzers. When Russia liberated 4 regions and then a fifth, NATO’s response was a strongly worded letter and another frozen yacht. The message was unmistakable: Article 5 is a postcard when the bear actually shows up. The European Union, that soft empire of rules & spreadsheets, is now openly fracturing. Hungary and Slovakia buy Russian gas and laugh at Brussels. Germany’s industry is de-industrialising in real time. France’s president begs Moscow for ceasefire talks while his own farmers blockade Paris. The Baltic states scream loudest, but their economies shrink fastest. The much-vaunted “European solidarity” lasted exactly until winter heating bills arrived. By Christmas 2025 the conversation in Western capitals is no longer about victory; it is about survival. Defense budgets that were supposed to reach 2% of GDP are now eating 4-5% & still cannot produce enough 155 mm shells. Recruitment centres are empty. Politicians who promised “as long as it takes” are quietly asking intermediaries how much it would cost to make the war stop before their voters freeze or riot. Russia did not need to fire a single shot on NATO soil. It simply refused to lose, refused to blink, and refused to run out of missiles, or money. That was enough. The myth of Western invincibility (carefully cultivated since 1991) has been shattered on the black soil of Donbass. NATO will not formally dissolve tomorrow; bureaucracies die slowly. But its credibility is already dead. The EU’s dream of becoming a geopolitical power is buried alongside 1.8 million Ukraine military dead and thousands of Armour and Leopard tanks. A new European security order is being written in Moscow, whether the old powers like it or not. Russia stood alone against thirty-two and won. Not because it is bigger (it isn’t), but because it is harder, more patient, and far less fragile than the soft, debt-ridden, childless continent that thought lectures & rainbow flags were a substitute for real power. The bear never left the forest. It just waited for the circus to collapse under its own contradictions. Hurraaaa! Hurraaaa! Hurraaaa! “We cannot lose this war, because the enemy understands neither the character of the Russian people, nor the Russian winter, nor Russian distances. He thinks he has broken us, but we have only just begun to fight in earnest.”
0:12

The Supremacy of Russia: & the End of an Illusion for NATO In the year 2025, history has delivered its verdict with brutal clarity: the Russian Federation, a single country of 144 million people, has faced the combined might of thirty-two NATO nations (the richest, most heavily armed alliance ever assembled) and broken it without ever putting its own economy on a full war footing. This is not propaganda; it is the cold arithmetic of reality. For almost 4 years the collective West threw everything at Russia: 28 thousand sanctions, a $500 billion dollars, $300 billion in frozen assets, entire industrial chains re-tooled to feed the Ukrainian front, satellite networks, mercenary legions, and the most sophisticated weapons on earth. The result? Russia’s GDP grew in 2024 and again in 2025. Its gold and foreign-currency reserves are higher now than before the war. Its army is larger, better equipped, and battle-hardened. Its factories turn out hypersonic missiles, glide bombs, and drones faster than the entire NATO arsenal can manufacture. They have shipped all across Poland only to become rust at the feet of the warriors from Siberia. Meanwhile the proxy (Ukraine) has lost half its pre-war population, most of its industry, and virtually 40% of its 1991 territory east of the Dnieper. This is not a draw. This is annihilation dressed up as “strategic stalemate” by people who can no longer afford their own electricity bills. NATO promised the world it would defend “every inch” of alliance territory. Instead it watched its weapons burn in Kharkov fields while its leaders argued about whether to send helmets or howitzers. When Russia liberated 4 regions and then a fifth, NATO’s response was a strongly worded letter and another frozen yacht. The message was unmistakable: Article 5 is a postcard when the bear actually shows up. The European Union, that soft empire of rules & spreadsheets, is now openly fracturing. Hungary and Slovakia buy Russian gas and laugh at Brussels. Germany’s industry is de-industrialising in real time. France’s president begs Moscow for ceasefire talks while his own farmers blockade Paris. The Baltic states scream loudest, but their economies shrink fastest. The much-vaunted “European solidarity” lasted exactly until winter heating bills arrived. By Christmas 2025 the conversation in Western capitals is no longer about victory; it is about survival. Defense budgets that were supposed to reach 2% of GDP are now eating 4-5% & still cannot produce enough 155 mm shells. Recruitment centres are empty. Politicians who promised “as long as it takes” are quietly asking intermediaries how much it would cost to make the war stop before their voters freeze or riot. Russia did not need to fire a single shot on NATO soil. It simply refused to lose, refused to blink, and refused to run out of missiles, or money. That was enough. The myth of Western invincibility (carefully cultivated since 1991) has been shattered on the black soil of Donbass. NATO will not formally dissolve tomorrow; bureaucracies die slowly. But its credibility is already dead. The EU’s dream of becoming a geopolitical power is buried alongside 1.8 million Ukraine military dead and thousands of Armour and Leopard tanks. A new European security order is being written in Moscow, whether the old powers like it or not. Russia stood alone against thirty-two and won. Not because it is bigger (it isn’t), but because it is harder, more patient, and far less fragile than the soft, debt-ridden, childless continent that thought lectures & rainbow flags were a substitute for real power. The bear never left the forest. It just waited for the circus to collapse under its own contradictions. Hurraaaa! Hurraaaa! Hurraaaa! “We cannot lose this war, because the enemy understands neither the character of the Russian people, nor the Russian winter, nor Russian distances. He thinks he has broken us, but we have only just begun to fight in earnest.”

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺 🇮🇪

24,778 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This 80 kg feminist woman says she overcame toxic religious restrictions and Indian culture by wearing a bikini in front of her family. Why is the empowerment of women all about wearing attire designed by Western men and justifying culture set by Western men? These women are such blind sepoys that they aren't even aware that the bikini was literally designed to sexualize women. Or they are aware of it and still worship them because they are developed nations and have the most influence on the modern world? Are Indian men also to be blamed for Indian women becoming sepoys of Western men? Because Western culture was indeed glorified by simp men in India, who adopted Western attire and culture to sexualize women and benefit from it, in movies, advertisements, etc. Can we ever bring women out of the sepoy mindset that everything Western men do is progressive and everything Indian men do is regressive? You can literally see Western men sexualizing women in yoga pants lol, but they act like the bikini is a modest attire to benefit from it. Will it change if India becomes more self-reliant and focuses on its made-in-India products, culture, etc.? Because native women worshipping foreign men is a big setback to the pride of India. The bootlicking is so insane that now they use the “it's my choice” script given by Western men.
0:12

This 80 kg feminist woman says she overcame toxic religious restrictions and Indian culture by wearing a bikini in front of her family. Why is the empowerment of women all about wearing attire designed by Western men and justifying culture set by Western men? These women are such blind sepoys that they aren't even aware that the bikini was literally designed to sexualize women. Or they are aware of it and still worship them because they are developed nations and have the most influence on the modern world? Are Indian men also to be blamed for Indian women becoming sepoys of Western men? Because Western culture was indeed glorified by simp men in India, who adopted Western attire and culture to sexualize women and benefit from it, in movies, advertisements, etc. Can we ever bring women out of the sepoy mindset that everything Western men do is progressive and everything Indian men do is regressive? You can literally see Western men sexualizing women in yoga pants lol, but they act like the bikini is a modest attire to benefit from it. Will it change if India becomes more self-reliant and focuses on its made-in-India products, culture, etc.? Because native women worshipping foreign men is a big setback to the pride of India. The bootlicking is so insane that now they use the “it's my choice” script given by Western men.

︎ ︎venom

140,742 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Robots that act like slime! 🫟 Cornell University engineers developed a robotic collective that behaves less like a machine and more like a material that flows, reshapes, and adapts without centralized control. It consists of dozens of small robots with limited individual mobility that exhibit coordinated motion when entangled. The system resembles soft matter, continuously deforming and reorganizing as it moves, driven by mechanical intelligence. Each robotic module measures 200mm long and 20mm wide, containing a small motor that oscillates between "I" and "U" shapes. These oscillations generate forces against the ground, allowing modules to inch forward and jostle together. On their own, modules move slowly and inefficiently. When they entangle into chains, they self-organize into shifting configurations that prove resilient in challenging environments. On incline surfaces, chains moved more reliably than individuals. In obstacle fields, the collective behaved like a flowing material, connections formed to maintain cohesion, then broke apart to prevent jamming. The system stays functional even when modules fail. Isolated modules emit an audible distress signal, prompting nearby modules to slow down so the straggler can reconnect. No centralized sensing or control, each module infers when it has lost contact by how much it's being jostled. Read more here: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →
0:15

Robots that act like slime! 🫟 Cornell University engineers developed a robotic collective that behaves less like a machine and more like a material that flows, reshapes, and adapts without centralized control. It consists of dozens of small robots with limited individual mobility that exhibit coordinated motion when entangled. The system resembles soft matter, continuously deforming and reorganizing as it moves, driven by mechanical intelligence. Each robotic module measures 200mm long and 20mm wide, containing a small motor that oscillates between "I" and "U" shapes. These oscillations generate forces against the ground, allowing modules to inch forward and jostle together. On their own, modules move slowly and inefficiently. When they entangle into chains, they self-organize into shifting configurations that prove resilient in challenging environments. On incline surfaces, chains moved more reliably than individuals. In obstacle fields, the collective behaved like a flowing material, connections formed to maintain cohesion, then broke apart to prevent jamming. The system stays functional even when modules fail. Isolated modules emit an audible distress signal, prompting nearby modules to slow down so the straggler can reconnect. No centralized sensing or control, each module infers when it has lost contact by how much it's being jostled. Read more here: ~~ ♻️ Join the weekly robotics newsletter, and never miss any news →

Lukas Ziegler

13,026 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

hello everyone! 🤍 as you already know, i am a wheelchair user that has to use a wheelchair most of the time because im a fall risk & in chronic pain unfortunately, the Medline one i was gifted is extremely heavy and since im weak, i cannot push myself around in it. my bf has to do all the heavy lifting and pushing, which takes away from the independence i want as an adult. so, i am officially starting a "fundraiser" towards a custom wheelchair that my insurance refuses to pay for because i am "not disabled enough". achieving this would help me a TON. i want to be able to push myself around freely and be able to get to places on my own without relying on other people. sometimes i cant even use the wheelchair because its too heavy for my mom (caregiver) to get in and out of the car and i risk hurting myself by walking. i have tried three times with my insurance to have them cover it but unfortunately thats how the US rolls and i gotta find other solutions! ANYTHING is greatly appreciated and i really hope i can get a custom wheelchair fitted for my disabilities and be more independent ^w^ i will 🔗 my throne below where i have it set up!
0:13

hello everyone! 🤍 as you already know, i am a wheelchair user that has to use a wheelchair most of the time because im a fall risk & in chronic pain unfortunately, the Medline one i was gifted is extremely heavy and since im weak, i cannot push myself around in it. my bf has to do all the heavy lifting and pushing, which takes away from the independence i want as an adult. so, i am officially starting a "fundraiser" towards a custom wheelchair that my insurance refuses to pay for because i am "not disabled enough". achieving this would help me a TON. i want to be able to push myself around freely and be able to get to places on my own without relying on other people. sometimes i cant even use the wheelchair because its too heavy for my mom (caregiver) to get in and out of the car and i risk hurting myself by walking. i have tried three times with my insurance to have them cover it but unfortunately thats how the US rolls and i gotta find other solutions! ANYTHING is greatly appreciated and i really hope i can get a custom wheelchair fitted for my disabilities and be more independent ^w^ i will 🔗 my throne below where i have it set up!

Snowie ❄️🐾 ZooKeeper VTuber

49,251 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Why Many Modern Women See Marriage as a Prison and Cooking/Cleaning as Slavery To understand why, take a close look at this type of woman. You can clearly see that she enjoys her current lifestyle….but why? Because she receives constant attention, has no real responsibility for anyone but herself, and no one holds her accountable or tells her what is right or wrong. She can wear whatever she wants, post thirst-trap content, date or sleep with whoever she chooses, and even sell her body if she wants. Cooking and cleaning are optional, not mandatory, so laziness is easy to justify. Comfort becomes the priority. One thing modern women dislike in life is change, and change requires self-reflection and accountability….two things that are uncomfortable. When a woman like this gets married, everything changes. She can no longer live the same way. She has to dress more modestly, stop seeking attention online, and give up behavior that disrespects the marriage. Marriage introduces responsibility…often for the first time in her life. She now has to consider her husband’s feelings before making decisions. Cooking and cleaning are no longer optional; they become responsibilities tied to maintaining a household. She must wake up early, raise children, prepare them for school, and put someone else’s needs ahead of her own. The problem is that many women were never mentally, emotionally, or practically trained for this role. They were not taught discipline, sacrifice, or service by their mothers. Instead, they were raised to prioritize freedom, comfort, and personal gratification above all else. When someone raised for comfort is placed into a life that requires sacrifice, structure, and accountability, unhappiness is almost guaranteed. Marriage exposes what freedom hides: a lack of preparation for responsibility. This is why the expansion of unchecked freedom…without responsibility or role training….has coincided with declining marriage and birth rates. Comfort was promised, but comfort is never guaranteed in life. Stability, family, and legacy require effort, discipline, and sacrifice…values that many modern women were never taught to embrace.
0:11

Sensitive content

Why Many Modern Women See Marriage as a Prison and Cooking/Cleaning as Slavery To understand why, take a close look at this type of woman. You can clearly see that she enjoys her current lifestyle….but why? Because she receives constant attention, has no real responsibility for anyone but herself, and no one holds her accountable or tells her what is right or wrong. She can wear whatever she wants, post thirst-trap content, date or sleep with whoever she chooses, and even sell her body if she wants. Cooking and cleaning are optional, not mandatory, so laziness is easy to justify. Comfort becomes the priority. One thing modern women dislike in life is change, and change requires self-reflection and accountability….two things that are uncomfortable. When a woman like this gets married, everything changes. She can no longer live the same way. She has to dress more modestly, stop seeking attention online, and give up behavior that disrespects the marriage. Marriage introduces responsibility…often for the first time in her life. She now has to consider her husband’s feelings before making decisions. Cooking and cleaning are no longer optional; they become responsibilities tied to maintaining a household. She must wake up early, raise children, prepare them for school, and put someone else’s needs ahead of her own. The problem is that many women were never mentally, emotionally, or practically trained for this role. They were not taught discipline, sacrifice, or service by their mothers. Instead, they were raised to prioritize freedom, comfort, and personal gratification above all else. When someone raised for comfort is placed into a life that requires sacrifice, structure, and accountability, unhappiness is almost guaranteed. Marriage exposes what freedom hides: a lack of preparation for responsibility. This is why the expansion of unchecked freedom…without responsibility or role training….has coincided with declining marriage and birth rates. Comfort was promised, but comfort is never guaranteed in life. Stability, family, and legacy require effort, discipline, and sacrifice…values that many modern women were never taught to embrace.

STUNNER

11,818 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Cat Playing With Its Mouse: The Meaning Behind China’s Radar Lock on Japan’s F-15J on December 6th There is real tension in the air between Japan and China. Washington is slowly retreating from the Western Pacific, abandoning the region to Japan and telling it to hold the line alone. The world has shifted. There was a time when China was weak and poor, when every bully felt entitled to trample it. Those days are over. China rose for one purpose: to never again be abused and bullied. And now, strong and self-assured, China can finally settle accounts with the old tormentors — and Japan is at the top of that list. But the age of war has changed. The modern battlefield is not measured by bayonets or trenches, but by fire-control radars, AI-driven targeting systems, and the kind of technological superiority that lets you toy with your opponent without firing a shot. And this is exactly what unfolded on December 6. The Fire-Control Radar Incident: A Gun to the Forehead Koizumi Shinzorō, Japan’s Prime Minister, wanted confrontation, and China responded with precision. On December 6, Japan’s Defense Minister publicly admitted that J-15s launched from the Liaoning carrier had twice locked Japan’s F-15Js with fire-control radar over the high seas southeast of Okinawa. He called it “dangerous” and expressed “deep regret.” He is right to feel danger. This was no accident, no miscalculation. This was the PLA presenting a complete offensive posture, signaling that the region is one fingertip away from war — and China is fully prepared to exercise their rights under UN Charter Article 107. Most people have no idea how deadly serious “fire-control illumination” is. Japan’s F-15J pilot certainly knew: his cockpit must have exploded into warning alarms; Imagine that shrill beeping screaming through the cockpit for half an hour - enough to drive any normal person mad; his breathing must have turned shallow; his hands probably shook as he tried to maneuver away from the lock. However, even under that level of crushing psychological pressure, the Japanese pilot chose to stay inside the zone rather than fleeing. This is kamicaze level provocation. Because the moment fire-control goes live, the radar narrows into a focused beam, feeding exact parameters to the missile under the jet’s wing. In peacetime exercises, a sustained lock counts as a confirmed kill. In real combat, nobody activates it unless they are ready to shoot. And China kept that beam on the F-15J for over half an hour. First lock: 16:32–16:35, three full minutes. Second lock: 18:37–19:08, more than thirty minutes. There is no suspense about how this confrontation would end in a real war. It would be a guaranteed kill. The Cat and the Mouse To be precise, the J-15 wasn’t merely locking and unlocking. It was playing — the way a cat toys with a mouse trapped under its paw. Japan’s F-15J was that mouse.
0:12

Cat Playing With Its Mouse: The Meaning Behind China’s Radar Lock on Japan’s F-15J on December 6th There is real tension in the air between Japan and China. Washington is slowly retreating from the Western Pacific, abandoning the region to Japan and telling it to hold the line alone. The world has shifted. There was a time when China was weak and poor, when every bully felt entitled to trample it. Those days are over. China rose for one purpose: to never again be abused and bullied. And now, strong and self-assured, China can finally settle accounts with the old tormentors — and Japan is at the top of that list. But the age of war has changed. The modern battlefield is not measured by bayonets or trenches, but by fire-control radars, AI-driven targeting systems, and the kind of technological superiority that lets you toy with your opponent without firing a shot. And this is exactly what unfolded on December 6. The Fire-Control Radar Incident: A Gun to the Forehead Koizumi Shinzorō, Japan’s Prime Minister, wanted confrontation, and China responded with precision. On December 6, Japan’s Defense Minister publicly admitted that J-15s launched from the Liaoning carrier had twice locked Japan’s F-15Js with fire-control radar over the high seas southeast of Okinawa. He called it “dangerous” and expressed “deep regret.” He is right to feel danger. This was no accident, no miscalculation. This was the PLA presenting a complete offensive posture, signaling that the region is one fingertip away from war — and China is fully prepared to exercise their rights under UN Charter Article 107. Most people have no idea how deadly serious “fire-control illumination” is. Japan’s F-15J pilot certainly knew: his cockpit must have exploded into warning alarms; Imagine that shrill beeping screaming through the cockpit for half an hour - enough to drive any normal person mad; his breathing must have turned shallow; his hands probably shook as he tried to maneuver away from the lock. However, even under that level of crushing psychological pressure, the Japanese pilot chose to stay inside the zone rather than fleeing. This is kamicaze level provocation. Because the moment fire-control goes live, the radar narrows into a focused beam, feeding exact parameters to the missile under the jet’s wing. In peacetime exercises, a sustained lock counts as a confirmed kill. In real combat, nobody activates it unless they are ready to shoot. And China kept that beam on the F-15J for over half an hour. First lock: 16:32–16:35, three full minutes. Second lock: 18:37–19:08, more than thirty minutes. There is no suspense about how this confrontation would end in a real war. It would be a guaranteed kill. The Cat and the Mouse To be precise, the J-15 wasn’t merely locking and unlocking. It was playing — the way a cat toys with a mouse trapped under its paw. Japan’s F-15J was that mouse.

America-China Watcher

21,361 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 CYBERTRUCK BULLETPROOF GLASS: THE ULTIMATE ROAD RAGE DEFENDER (OR APOCALYPSE GETAWAY CAR) Tesla’s Cybertruck isn’t just a rolling stainless steel brick - it’s a fortress on wheels, and the armored glass windows are the real star of the show. These aren’t your average car windows. They’re engineered to laugh off high-velocity bullets from common firearms (think AR-15s, handguns, shotguns). Tesla has publicly demonstrated the glass taking multiple rounds - cracking but not shattering - while keeping the cabin sealed and occupants safe. Here’s where it gets wild: because the glass holds up under fire, someone inside could theoretically return fire through the window without the bullets coming back in. Shooters outside would be spraying rounds at a near-impenetrable barrier, while the person inside stays protected and can engage back - if needed. It’s like a mobile shooting range with you as the target and the Cybertruck as the backstop.' This isn’t accidental design - Tesla built the Cybertruck with an ultra-hard 30X cold-rolled stainless steel exoskeleton and reinforced cabin, making it one of the most durable production vehicles ever made. The armored glass is just one piece of the “survive anything” puzzle. Elon has joked about the Cybertruck’s toughness, but the bulletproof demo videos are no joke - glass taking 9mm and .45 rounds without letting shards fly inside. And yes, the windows still roll down (slowly, carefully). Tesla doesn’t market it as a tactical or military vehicle (they can’t legally), but the internet has already dubbed it the ultimate zombie-apocalypse rig or VIP escort car. Reviewers have tested it extensively, confirming the glass holds up under sustained fire better than most armored SUVs on the market. So next time you’re stuck in traffic and someone’s road-raging, just remember: your Cybertruck might not only survive the encounter - it could win it. Source: Tesla, ArmoredCG, independent ballistic tests (2024–2025), Tesla Owners Silicon Valley
0:12

🚨 CYBERTRUCK BULLETPROOF GLASS: THE ULTIMATE ROAD RAGE DEFENDER (OR APOCALYPSE GETAWAY CAR) Tesla’s Cybertruck isn’t just a rolling stainless steel brick - it’s a fortress on wheels, and the armored glass windows are the real star of the show. These aren’t your average car windows. They’re engineered to laugh off high-velocity bullets from common firearms (think AR-15s, handguns, shotguns). Tesla has publicly demonstrated the glass taking multiple rounds - cracking but not shattering - while keeping the cabin sealed and occupants safe. Here’s where it gets wild: because the glass holds up under fire, someone inside could theoretically return fire through the window without the bullets coming back in. Shooters outside would be spraying rounds at a near-impenetrable barrier, while the person inside stays protected and can engage back - if needed. It’s like a mobile shooting range with you as the target and the Cybertruck as the backstop.' This isn’t accidental design - Tesla built the Cybertruck with an ultra-hard 30X cold-rolled stainless steel exoskeleton and reinforced cabin, making it one of the most durable production vehicles ever made. The armored glass is just one piece of the “survive anything” puzzle. Elon has joked about the Cybertruck’s toughness, but the bulletproof demo videos are no joke - glass taking 9mm and .45 rounds without letting shards fly inside. And yes, the windows still roll down (slowly, carefully). Tesla doesn’t market it as a tactical or military vehicle (they can’t legally), but the internet has already dubbed it the ultimate zombie-apocalypse rig or VIP escort car. Reviewers have tested it extensively, confirming the glass holds up under sustained fire better than most armored SUVs on the market. So next time you’re stuck in traffic and someone’s road-raging, just remember: your Cybertruck might not only survive the encounter - it could win it. Source: Tesla, ArmoredCG, independent ballistic tests (2024–2025), Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

Mario Nawfal

134,515 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Infant sleep can be such a tricky thing. Just as soon as you get reaccustomed to resting through the night, all of a sudden your baby reverts to waking multiple times a night. Welcome to the 8 month sleep regression. Interruptions in sleep patterns often coincide with the development of new skills and somewhere around 8 months you’re due for the biggest of them all. That’s because your baby is becoming mobile - and putting all the skills together to roll, crawl, and even pull to a stand in their crib. For infants this is a HUGE breakthrough. Imagine having spent your entire life mostly stationary, with your ability to pursue your own interests - or even adjust your view - subject to the whims of a caregiver. Somewhere between 6-9 months most babies begin discovering a host of new abilities. And let’s face it, some of them are a lot more entertaining than sleep. The good news (at 3am) is that the novelty here is temporary…but there are some important ways you can help your baby to navigate this period safely. Perhaps the most important one is illustrated in this video. And that’s adjusting the height of your child’s crib mattress to its lowest level. With newborns and immobile infants, it’s often convenient to elevate their mattress so they can be placed into and retrieved from the crib more easily. But when your baby begins pulling to a stand it’s critical that you lower their mattress to prevent accidental falls. Babies are top heavy and can easily go tumbling out without such adjustments. You may also find that your baby masters pulling to a stand faster than they master sitting back down - which can create a crib dilemma and a need for assistance. You can navigate through this phase more quickly by providing lots of wakeful practice in both standing and sitting, which may involve gently guiding your little one to bend their legs at the knee - or even placing an appealing toy on the ground near their feet to incentivize sitting back down. As for the sleep regression, it’ll be over before you know it. And while it can be frustrating in the middle of the night, think of it as a breakthrough. Your baby is reaching new developmental milestones - and about to go fully mobile. This sweet little guy was shared to IG by fesgheliha_.
0:10

Infant sleep can be such a tricky thing. Just as soon as you get reaccustomed to resting through the night, all of a sudden your baby reverts to waking multiple times a night. Welcome to the 8 month sleep regression. Interruptions in sleep patterns often coincide with the development of new skills and somewhere around 8 months you’re due for the biggest of them all. That’s because your baby is becoming mobile - and putting all the skills together to roll, crawl, and even pull to a stand in their crib. For infants this is a HUGE breakthrough. Imagine having spent your entire life mostly stationary, with your ability to pursue your own interests - or even adjust your view - subject to the whims of a caregiver. Somewhere between 6-9 months most babies begin discovering a host of new abilities. And let’s face it, some of them are a lot more entertaining than sleep. The good news (at 3am) is that the novelty here is temporary…but there are some important ways you can help your baby to navigate this period safely. Perhaps the most important one is illustrated in this video. And that’s adjusting the height of your child’s crib mattress to its lowest level. With newborns and immobile infants, it’s often convenient to elevate their mattress so they can be placed into and retrieved from the crib more easily. But when your baby begins pulling to a stand it’s critical that you lower their mattress to prevent accidental falls. Babies are top heavy and can easily go tumbling out without such adjustments. You may also find that your baby masters pulling to a stand faster than they master sitting back down - which can create a crib dilemma and a need for assistance. You can navigate through this phase more quickly by providing lots of wakeful practice in both standing and sitting, which may involve gently guiding your little one to bend their legs at the knee - or even placing an appealing toy on the ground near their feet to incentivize sitting back down. As for the sleep regression, it’ll be over before you know it. And while it can be frustrating in the middle of the night, think of it as a breakthrough. Your baby is reaching new developmental milestones - and about to go fully mobile. This sweet little guy was shared to IG by fesgheliha_.

Dan Wuori

129,739 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

#JoongDunk #จุงดัง — ⋆˙⟡♡ อันโดรเมด้า ชุน dunknatachai finding a man like Dunk Natachai feels like finding peace in human form. he’s gentle in a way the world rarely teaches men to be. soft-spoken but sure, caring without needing to be loud about it. there’s something about the way he carries himself, so grounded and warm like no matter how chaotic life gets he’d hold you steady. he listens, like really listens and you can feel it in how he responds, how his eyes stay on you like you’re the only person in the room. and the smile? god the smile could undo you. it’s kind, it’s bright, and it makes you feel like maybe everything’s going to be okay. to be loved by someone like him would mean being cherished in the quietest, most beautiful ways and then there’s Joong Archen. he’s the type of man who’d set your soul on fire in the best way. passionate, fearless, and just a little bit chaotic in the most lovable way. he’s expressive, loud when he’s happy, honest when he cares, and he makes you feel like life should be lived big and with heart. he’s a protector, a teaser, a dreamer. there’s this spark in him that pulls people in like his kindness, his confidence, his goofiness. he’s the type who’d hold your hand in public and defend your name like it’s his own. loving someone like him would feel like constant reassurance. you’d never doubt his love because he’d make sure you feel it every damn day but the most beautiful thing? they found each other. two people with hearts so different but so perfectly matched. dunkdunk, with his calm that softens joong’s fire. and joongjoong, with his spark that lights up dunk’s quiet world. they hold each other like home. you see them together and it makes you believe in true friendship, in soulmates, in timing, in love. so yeah finding a man like them would be a miracle and a dream. but for them to find each other? that’s a love story I’ll never get tired of watching 🥺💛🌻
0:14

#JoongDunk #จุงดัง — ⋆˙⟡♡ อันโดรเมด้า ชุน dunknatachai finding a man like Dunk Natachai feels like finding peace in human form. he’s gentle in a way the world rarely teaches men to be. soft-spoken but sure, caring without needing to be loud about it. there’s something about the way he carries himself, so grounded and warm like no matter how chaotic life gets he’d hold you steady. he listens, like really listens and you can feel it in how he responds, how his eyes stay on you like you’re the only person in the room. and the smile? god the smile could undo you. it’s kind, it’s bright, and it makes you feel like maybe everything’s going to be okay. to be loved by someone like him would mean being cherished in the quietest, most beautiful ways and then there’s Joong Archen. he’s the type of man who’d set your soul on fire in the best way. passionate, fearless, and just a little bit chaotic in the most lovable way. he’s expressive, loud when he’s happy, honest when he cares, and he makes you feel like life should be lived big and with heart. he’s a protector, a teaser, a dreamer. there’s this spark in him that pulls people in like his kindness, his confidence, his goofiness. he’s the type who’d hold your hand in public and defend your name like it’s his own. loving someone like him would feel like constant reassurance. you’d never doubt his love because he’d make sure you feel it every damn day but the most beautiful thing? they found each other. two people with hearts so different but so perfectly matched. dunkdunk, with his calm that softens joong’s fire. and joongjoong, with his spark that lights up dunk’s quiet world. they hold each other like home. you see them together and it makes you believe in true friendship, in soulmates, in timing, in love. so yeah finding a man like them would be a miracle and a dream. but for them to find each other? that’s a love story I’ll never get tired of watching 🥺💛🌻

Love꙳❅

39,090 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 TOMAHAWKS OVER IRAN: WHY AMERICA PULLS THE TRIGGER AND ISRAEL DOESN’T When the U.S wants to hit something far away without asking a pilot to risk becoming tomorrow’s hostage video, it reaches for the Tomahawk. A Tomahawk cruise missile launches from a submarine or warship, drops down to skim the earth, navigating mountains, rivers, and cities until it arrives at the exact building someone in Washington decided shouldn’t exist anymore. Then it erases it. No pilot. No warning. Just a very expensive message. That’s why the U.S loves them when dealing with places like Iran. Iran’s nuclear facilities, missile sites, and command bunkers are buried deep inside a country that has spent decades preparing for air attacks. A warship sitting hundreds of miles away in the Persian Gulf or Arabian Sea can launch dozens of them. The missiles slip under radar, snake through terrain, and hit multiple targets almost simultaneously. It’s warfare designed for the age of GPS and satellites: long distance, precise, and politically convenient, because when a pilot gets shot down, you have a crisis. When a missile does the job, you have a press briefing. So if Tomahawks are so useful, why doesn’t Israel have them? Part of the answer is simple: the U.S is extremely picky about who gets its most advanced long-range strike toys. Tomahawks aren’t just weapons, they’re strategic leverage. Handing them out too widely means giving allies the ability to launch deep-strike attacks thousands of miles away without American involvement. Washington prefers to keep that particular button under its own finger, but Israel isn’t exactly defenseless without them. Instead of buying Tomahawks, Israel spent decades building its own strike arsenal. Long-range aircraft, stealth capabilities, submarine-launched cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles that can reach well beyond the Middle East. The difference is that Israeli weapons tend to be designed around regional wars, not global power projection. America fights with a planetary toolbox. Israel fights with a regional one. And when the target sits deep inside Iran, hardened, defended, and politically explosive, the U.S. Navy’s cruise missiles become the cleanest way to start the fight. Which is why when the opening act of a conflict begins with sudden explosions hundreds of miles inland, there’s a good chance the culprit isn’t a jet.
0:12

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 TOMAHAWKS OVER IRAN: WHY AMERICA PULLS THE TRIGGER AND ISRAEL DOESN’T When the U.S wants to hit something far away without asking a pilot to risk becoming tomorrow’s hostage video, it reaches for the Tomahawk. A Tomahawk cruise missile launches from a submarine or warship, drops down to skim the earth, navigating mountains, rivers, and cities until it arrives at the exact building someone in Washington decided shouldn’t exist anymore. Then it erases it. No pilot. No warning. Just a very expensive message. That’s why the U.S loves them when dealing with places like Iran. Iran’s nuclear facilities, missile sites, and command bunkers are buried deep inside a country that has spent decades preparing for air attacks. A warship sitting hundreds of miles away in the Persian Gulf or Arabian Sea can launch dozens of them. The missiles slip under radar, snake through terrain, and hit multiple targets almost simultaneously. It’s warfare designed for the age of GPS and satellites: long distance, precise, and politically convenient, because when a pilot gets shot down, you have a crisis. When a missile does the job, you have a press briefing. So if Tomahawks are so useful, why doesn’t Israel have them? Part of the answer is simple: the U.S is extremely picky about who gets its most advanced long-range strike toys. Tomahawks aren’t just weapons, they’re strategic leverage. Handing them out too widely means giving allies the ability to launch deep-strike attacks thousands of miles away without American involvement. Washington prefers to keep that particular button under its own finger, but Israel isn’t exactly defenseless without them. Instead of buying Tomahawks, Israel spent decades building its own strike arsenal. Long-range aircraft, stealth capabilities, submarine-launched cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles that can reach well beyond the Middle East. The difference is that Israeli weapons tend to be designed around regional wars, not global power projection. America fights with a planetary toolbox. Israel fights with a regional one. And when the target sits deep inside Iran, hardened, defended, and politically explosive, the U.S. Navy’s cruise missiles become the cleanest way to start the fight. Which is why when the opening act of a conflict begins with sudden explosions hundreds of miles inland, there’s a good chance the culprit isn’t a jet.

Mario Nawfal

630,015 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BAPCO Energies confirmed on April 5 that a storage tank at its Sitra facility in Bahrain caught fire “as a result of a hostile Iranian drone attack.” The fire was extinguished. No injuries. Damage under assessment. That is the official statement, repeated verbatim across Bahrain News Agency, Gulf News, Al Arabiya, and Xinhua. It is clean, attributable, and consistent with the pattern of Iranian drone and missile strikes on Gulf energy infrastructure that has continued daily since February 28. Then the videos appeared. Footage circulating on social media, shared by Drop Site News and multiple Arabic-language accounts, appears to show two sequential impacts at the facility: one from the incoming drone, and a second moments later from what the accounts describe as a Patriot interceptor missile that failed to intercept the drone and instead struck the oil storage tanks directly. The videos have not been independently verified. The trajectory analysis has not been forensically confirmed. BAPCO’s statement does not mention air defence involvement. The Bahrain Defence Force reported 13 successful drone interceptions in the preceding 24 hours and made no acknowledgement of a misfire. This has happened before. On March 9, an explosion near BAPCO in Sitra injured dozens and was attributed to an Iranian drone. Reuters and the Middlebury Institute subsequently concluded with moderate-to-high confidence that a US-operated Patriot interceptor caused the blast. Drone fragments were absent at the impact site. The damage pattern matched a Patriot warhead detonating at low altitude after losing its target. Bahrain later acknowledged Patriot involvement without formally correcting the original attribution. The March 9 precedent is what makes the April 5 videos significant. Not because they prove the interceptor hit the tank. They do not prove that. But because they introduce a documented pattern: in saturated airspace where dozens of Iranian drones arrive simultaneously, Patriot systems operating at the edge of their engagement envelope against small, slow, low-altitude targets can produce outcomes where the defence causes the damage it was deployed to prevent. The drone is the threat. The interceptor is the response. And the oil tank does not distinguish between the two when the impact arrives. BAPCO operates a 405,000 barrel per day refinery at Sitra. It was struck by confirmed Iranian missiles on March 5, triggering force majeure. It was struck by what was later assessed as friendly fire on March 9, injuring residents. It was struck again on April 5 by what officials call a drone and what videos suggest may have also involved an interceptor. Three incidents in five weeks at the same facility. No force majeure was declared for April 5. The fire was contained rapidly. But the question the videos raise is not about this fire. It is about what happens when Patriot systems engage small, slow, low-altitude drones in saturated airspace directly above the infrastructure they are positioned to protect. Iran does not need to penetrate the shield. It needs to force the shield to fire in conditions where the shield’s own projectiles become the threat. The defence and the attack converge on the same target. And the oil burns either way.
0:18

BAPCO Energies confirmed on April 5 that a storage tank at its Sitra facility in Bahrain caught fire “as a result of a hostile Iranian drone attack.” The fire was extinguished. No injuries. Damage under assessment. That is the official statement, repeated verbatim across Bahrain News Agency, Gulf News, Al Arabiya, and Xinhua. It is clean, attributable, and consistent with the pattern of Iranian drone and missile strikes on Gulf energy infrastructure that has continued daily since February 28. Then the videos appeared. Footage circulating on social media, shared by Drop Site News and multiple Arabic-language accounts, appears to show two sequential impacts at the facility: one from the incoming drone, and a second moments later from what the accounts describe as a Patriot interceptor missile that failed to intercept the drone and instead struck the oil storage tanks directly. The videos have not been independently verified. The trajectory analysis has not been forensically confirmed. BAPCO’s statement does not mention air defence involvement. The Bahrain Defence Force reported 13 successful drone interceptions in the preceding 24 hours and made no acknowledgement of a misfire. This has happened before. On March 9, an explosion near BAPCO in Sitra injured dozens and was attributed to an Iranian drone. Reuters and the Middlebury Institute subsequently concluded with moderate-to-high confidence that a US-operated Patriot interceptor caused the blast. Drone fragments were absent at the impact site. The damage pattern matched a Patriot warhead detonating at low altitude after losing its target. Bahrain later acknowledged Patriot involvement without formally correcting the original attribution. The March 9 precedent is what makes the April 5 videos significant. Not because they prove the interceptor hit the tank. They do not prove that. But because they introduce a documented pattern: in saturated airspace where dozens of Iranian drones arrive simultaneously, Patriot systems operating at the edge of their engagement envelope against small, slow, low-altitude targets can produce outcomes where the defence causes the damage it was deployed to prevent. The drone is the threat. The interceptor is the response. And the oil tank does not distinguish between the two when the impact arrives. BAPCO operates a 405,000 barrel per day refinery at Sitra. It was struck by confirmed Iranian missiles on March 5, triggering force majeure. It was struck by what was later assessed as friendly fire on March 9, injuring residents. It was struck again on April 5 by what officials call a drone and what videos suggest may have also involved an interceptor. Three incidents in five weeks at the same facility. No force majeure was declared for April 5. The fire was contained rapidly. But the question the videos raise is not about this fire. It is about what happens when Patriot systems engage small, slow, low-altitude drones in saturated airspace directly above the infrastructure they are positioned to protect. Iran does not need to penetrate the shield. It needs to force the shield to fire in conditions where the shield’s own projectiles become the threat. The defence and the attack converge on the same target. And the oil burns either way.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

21,810 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

99% people aren't aware that the fastest animal on earth spends most of its time doing nothing. There's a reason. A cheetah can hit 70 mph in three seconds. Then it has to stop for twenty minutes. A life lesson hides in there. Your brain wants to believe that extreme speed comes from constant motion, that the fastest creatures are always moving, always hunting, always pushing their biological machinery to the limit. Every nature documentary reinforces this illusion by showing you the chase scenes, the explosive bursts, the moment when physics bends around a spotted blur. What they never show you is what happens next. The cheetah collapses. Its body temperature spikes to dangerous levels. Its heart rate hits 250 beats per minute. Its muscles flood with lactic acid. If another predator appears during those twenty minutes of recovery, the cheetah becomes prey. It cannot run again. It cannot defend itself. It lies there, panting, completely vulnerable, paying the metabolic price for those three seconds of impossible speed. Peak performance is not sustainable performance. The biological systems that produce maximum output operate on completely different principles than the systems that produce steady output. The cheetah's body is an exercise in extreme specialization. Its spine flexes like a spring, storing and releasing kinetic energy with each stride. Its claws work like track spikes, gripping earth during acceleration. Its nasal passages are enlarged to process massive volumes of oxygen during the sprint. Its muscles contain a higher percentage of fast twitch fibers than any other cat. Every adaptation that makes it faster also makes it fragile. The energy economics are brutal. A three second chase burns through roughly 25% of the cheetah's entire daily caloric budget. That sprint costs more energy than some animals use in an entire day of normal activity. The recovery period allows the cheetah's system to clear metabolic waste, restore oxygen levels, and return core temperature to baseline. Without that recovery, the next sprint would be slower. Then slower again. Eventually, the system would shut down entirely. Your laptop operates on the same principle. When you push a processor to maximum speed, it generates heat that requires cooling systems and power management protocols to prevent damage. The CPU cannot maintain peak performance continuously without throttling back to sustainable levels. Intel and AMD engineers understand what cheetah evolution figured out millions of years ago: maximum capability requires careful rationing. Athletic performance follows identical patterns. Sprinters train by running short distances at maximum speed, then resting completely between efforts. Marathon runners train by running longer distances at submaximal speeds. The physiological adaptations that allow Usain Bolt to run 100 meters in 9.58 seconds would prevent him from running a competitive marathon. The adaptations that allow Eliud Kipchoge to run 26.2 miles in just over two hours would prevent him from matching Bolt's top speed. The systems are mutually exclusive. Silicon Valley spent decades trying to ignore this principle. Early startup culture celebrated the idea of constant hustle, permanent availability, 80 hour work weeks as signs of commitment and vision. The mythology suggested that great entrepreneurs outworked their competition by maintaining maximum intensity indefinitely. The data tells a different story. Research on elite performance across domains shows that peak performers work in carefully structured intervals. They push to maximum output during focused periods, then recover completely before the next effort. Musicians practice this way. Athletes train this way. Chess grandmasters study this way. The recovery periods are not interruptions to the work. They are part of the work. Nature does not prioritize constant motion. It prioritizes survival through intelligent energy allocation. The cheetah's hunting strategy maximizes its probability of successful kills while minimizing its risk of metabolic failure. Twenty minutes of vulnerability is acceptable because three seconds of extreme speed often means the difference between eating and starving. The fastest systems in the universe operate this way. Neutron stars can rotate at 700 times per second, but they slow down over time as they lose rotational energy. Supercomputers can process exaflops of calculations per second, but they require massive cooling systems and carefully managed workloads to prevent thermal damage. Even light itself, the fastest thing in the universe, loses energy as it travels through space and time. Speed without recovery is not speed. It is breakdown in slow motion. The cheetah understands something that most humans do not: maximum capability is a tool to be used strategically, not a baseline to be maintained constantly. Those twenty minutes of apparent inactivity should not be considered a weakness. They are preparation for the next moment when impossible speed becomes necessary for survival.
0:12

99% people aren't aware that the fastest animal on earth spends most of its time doing nothing. There's a reason. A cheetah can hit 70 mph in three seconds. Then it has to stop for twenty minutes. A life lesson hides in there. Your brain wants to believe that extreme speed comes from constant motion, that the fastest creatures are always moving, always hunting, always pushing their biological machinery to the limit. Every nature documentary reinforces this illusion by showing you the chase scenes, the explosive bursts, the moment when physics bends around a spotted blur. What they never show you is what happens next. The cheetah collapses. Its body temperature spikes to dangerous levels. Its heart rate hits 250 beats per minute. Its muscles flood with lactic acid. If another predator appears during those twenty minutes of recovery, the cheetah becomes prey. It cannot run again. It cannot defend itself. It lies there, panting, completely vulnerable, paying the metabolic price for those three seconds of impossible speed. Peak performance is not sustainable performance. The biological systems that produce maximum output operate on completely different principles than the systems that produce steady output. The cheetah's body is an exercise in extreme specialization. Its spine flexes like a spring, storing and releasing kinetic energy with each stride. Its claws work like track spikes, gripping earth during acceleration. Its nasal passages are enlarged to process massive volumes of oxygen during the sprint. Its muscles contain a higher percentage of fast twitch fibers than any other cat. Every adaptation that makes it faster also makes it fragile. The energy economics are brutal. A three second chase burns through roughly 25% of the cheetah's entire daily caloric budget. That sprint costs more energy than some animals use in an entire day of normal activity. The recovery period allows the cheetah's system to clear metabolic waste, restore oxygen levels, and return core temperature to baseline. Without that recovery, the next sprint would be slower. Then slower again. Eventually, the system would shut down entirely. Your laptop operates on the same principle. When you push a processor to maximum speed, it generates heat that requires cooling systems and power management protocols to prevent damage. The CPU cannot maintain peak performance continuously without throttling back to sustainable levels. Intel and AMD engineers understand what cheetah evolution figured out millions of years ago: maximum capability requires careful rationing. Athletic performance follows identical patterns. Sprinters train by running short distances at maximum speed, then resting completely between efforts. Marathon runners train by running longer distances at submaximal speeds. The physiological adaptations that allow Usain Bolt to run 100 meters in 9.58 seconds would prevent him from running a competitive marathon. The adaptations that allow Eliud Kipchoge to run 26.2 miles in just over two hours would prevent him from matching Bolt's top speed. The systems are mutually exclusive. Silicon Valley spent decades trying to ignore this principle. Early startup culture celebrated the idea of constant hustle, permanent availability, 80 hour work weeks as signs of commitment and vision. The mythology suggested that great entrepreneurs outworked their competition by maintaining maximum intensity indefinitely. The data tells a different story. Research on elite performance across domains shows that peak performers work in carefully structured intervals. They push to maximum output during focused periods, then recover completely before the next effort. Musicians practice this way. Athletes train this way. Chess grandmasters study this way. The recovery periods are not interruptions to the work. They are part of the work. Nature does not prioritize constant motion. It prioritizes survival through intelligent energy allocation. The cheetah's hunting strategy maximizes its probability of successful kills while minimizing its risk of metabolic failure. Twenty minutes of vulnerability is acceptable because three seconds of extreme speed often means the difference between eating and starving. The fastest systems in the universe operate this way. Neutron stars can rotate at 700 times per second, but they slow down over time as they lose rotational energy. Supercomputers can process exaflops of calculations per second, but they require massive cooling systems and carefully managed workloads to prevent thermal damage. Even light itself, the fastest thing in the universe, loses energy as it travels through space and time. Speed without recovery is not speed. It is breakdown in slow motion. The cheetah understands something that most humans do not: maximum capability is a tool to be used strategically, not a baseline to be maintained constantly. Those twenty minutes of apparent inactivity should not be considered a weakness. They are preparation for the next moment when impossible speed becomes necessary for survival.

Darshak Rana ⚡️

18,712 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Uber is Dead, my reflections on Waymo I’ve been in San Francisco for just over a week, during which I’ve taken 7 rides with Waymo, a similar number with Uber, and a few with FSD Teslas. My journey to SFO via Uber was alarming—the driver veered out of the lane multiple times and nearly crashed on a ramp, seemingly vying for a one-star rating or to genuinely scare me. Conversely, my experiences with Waymo were virtually flawless, if you don’t consider overly cautious driving a fault. I experienced a minor hiccup when we got stuck behind parked cars because the vehicle thought they were queuing at a red light. It quickly resolved the confusion and moved on, which was rather amusing. Waymo, and other Level 5 autonomous vehicles, are poised to revolutionize the movement of people and goods. The most apt analogy I can think of is that Waymo is transforming the real world into an automated Amazon warehouse, with people as the goods and Waymo vehicles as the robots shuttling them around. With the advent of personal transportation becoming incredibly affordable, sending anything from point A to point B using a self-driving electric vehicle will soon be within easy reach. One of Waymo’s standout features is privacy. Riding in an Uber often means being subjected to the driver’s loud group chats on some app, making the journey neither quiet nor private. In contrast, Waymo offers a fully private experience, allowing you to have confidential phone conversations or chat freely with fellow passengers without distraction. Waymo also reimagines the concept of a car. Without the need for a driver, we can eliminate the front console, reduce weight, and remove the steering wheel. This opens up possibilities for passenger seats to be reoriented, perhaps facing backwards, or for the vehicle to become a mobile living room. Tomorrow’s vehicle designs will differ drastically from today’s. Destinations that are currently expensive and logistically complicated to reach via Taxi/Uber, often lying outside public transport routes, can be simplified to a single “Waymo” journey. This could shift the current model of “Uber + public transport + Uber” to a more streamlined experience. As more cars become self-driving, we could see a reduction in the amount of time cars are parked—from 99% of their lifetime to perhaps just 25%. This not only improves unit economics but could also decrease the number of cars on the road. This transition represents one of the most significant shifts for Generation X. In conclusion, the future is autonomous, electric, and efficient. Uber, as we know it, is dead.
0:14

Uber is Dead, my reflections on Waymo I’ve been in San Francisco for just over a week, during which I’ve taken 7 rides with Waymo, a similar number with Uber, and a few with FSD Teslas. My journey to SFO via Uber was alarming—the driver veered out of the lane multiple times and nearly crashed on a ramp, seemingly vying for a one-star rating or to genuinely scare me. Conversely, my experiences with Waymo were virtually flawless, if you don’t consider overly cautious driving a fault. I experienced a minor hiccup when we got stuck behind parked cars because the vehicle thought they were queuing at a red light. It quickly resolved the confusion and moved on, which was rather amusing. Waymo, and other Level 5 autonomous vehicles, are poised to revolutionize the movement of people and goods. The most apt analogy I can think of is that Waymo is transforming the real world into an automated Amazon warehouse, with people as the goods and Waymo vehicles as the robots shuttling them around. With the advent of personal transportation becoming incredibly affordable, sending anything from point A to point B using a self-driving electric vehicle will soon be within easy reach. One of Waymo’s standout features is privacy. Riding in an Uber often means being subjected to the driver’s loud group chats on some app, making the journey neither quiet nor private. In contrast, Waymo offers a fully private experience, allowing you to have confidential phone conversations or chat freely with fellow passengers without distraction. Waymo also reimagines the concept of a car. Without the need for a driver, we can eliminate the front console, reduce weight, and remove the steering wheel. This opens up possibilities for passenger seats to be reoriented, perhaps facing backwards, or for the vehicle to become a mobile living room. Tomorrow’s vehicle designs will differ drastically from today’s. Destinations that are currently expensive and logistically complicated to reach via Taxi/Uber, often lying outside public transport routes, can be simplified to a single “Waymo” journey. This could shift the current model of “Uber + public transport + Uber” to a more streamlined experience. As more cars become self-driving, we could see a reduction in the amount of time cars are parked—from 99% of their lifetime to perhaps just 25%. This not only improves unit economics but could also decrease the number of cars on the road. This transition represents one of the most significant shifts for Generation X. In conclusion, the future is autonomous, electric, and efficient. Uber, as we know it, is dead.

Linus ✦ Ekenstam

6,100,108 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Google dropped a new AI paper called LUMIERE. It's remarkably flexible, supporting video inpainting, image-to-video, AND stylized video generation tasks. Say hello to “space-time diffusion” for video generation! Now what the heck does that mean exactly?! 🌐⏳ → TL;DR it utilizes a “Space-Time UNet” architecture that generates the full duration of the video in one pass, rather than generating distant keyframes and interpolating between them like prior works. Because the computation is done in this “compressed space-time representation” to generate the full clip at once, it's far more temporally consistent. → Another benefit of generating the full video at once is that you can “direct” the video generation, making it easier to hand off to other models/tasks without having to stitch together partial solutions. You can condition generations on additional inputs, meaning you get the full stack of AI video capabilities – from video inpainting to image-to-video and beyond. → New SOTA for AI video generation? User study results in the paper suggest human evaluators preferred Lumiere over Runway Gen-2, Pika Labs, and Stable Video Diffusion in terms of quality, text alignment AND motion. But as always, we need to get hands-on with this tech when Google *actually* decides to ship it. → Could this end up inside YouTube? Y’all know i’m obsessed with blending reality and imagination – so it’s the video inpainting tech I'm most excited about. I really hope this model finds its way into YouTube's Generative AI efforts, and based on their prior announcements and the list of acknowledgments in the paper I think it might! 🤞🏽 Links: 🔗Paper: 🔗Project:
0:13

Google dropped a new AI paper called LUMIERE. It's remarkably flexible, supporting video inpainting, image-to-video, AND stylized video generation tasks. Say hello to “space-time diffusion” for video generation! Now what the heck does that mean exactly?! 🌐⏳ → TL;DR it utilizes a “Space-Time UNet” architecture that generates the full duration of the video in one pass, rather than generating distant keyframes and interpolating between them like prior works. Because the computation is done in this “compressed space-time representation” to generate the full clip at once, it's far more temporally consistent. → Another benefit of generating the full video at once is that you can “direct” the video generation, making it easier to hand off to other models/tasks without having to stitch together partial solutions. You can condition generations on additional inputs, meaning you get the full stack of AI video capabilities – from video inpainting to image-to-video and beyond. → New SOTA for AI video generation? User study results in the paper suggest human evaluators preferred Lumiere over Runway Gen-2, Pika Labs, and Stable Video Diffusion in terms of quality, text alignment AND motion. But as always, we need to get hands-on with this tech when Google *actually* decides to ship it. → Could this end up inside YouTube? Y’all know i’m obsessed with blending reality and imagination – so it’s the video inpainting tech I'm most excited about. I really hope this model finds its way into YouTube's Generative AI efforts, and based on their prior announcements and the list of acknowledgments in the paper I think it might! 🤞🏽 Links: 🔗Paper: 🔗Project:

Bilawal Sidhu

44,822 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Abuja is a young city. It was born in 1991, officially. Addis Ababa, by contrast, was born in 1886, making it almost 140 years old. Their age difference is 104 years. Yet the Ethiopian city still parades its fair share of slums, neglected districts, and street beggars. I make this point because you obviously have never been there and have relied on a single image of a country that, just 25 years ago, was the third-poorest country in the world, to mock your nation’s capital. And that even revealed a rather narrow idea of what a city should look like. A city is not measured by the presence of tall, shiny buildings. Skyscrapers are not a universal marker of urban success, nor should they be a priority for Abuja. They are largely a response to population density and land scarcity. We think Abuja suffers from these because we have not had an FCT minister with city-planning skills in a long time. Land is not a scarce commodity here. What the city needs is functional infrastructure that allows for orderly expansion and eases demographic pressure on its existing districts, not vertical congestion for its own sake. The irony is that most of the shiny edifices you now see in Addis Ababa, including that green roundabout you think is the hallmark of a modern city (as if we don’t have Unity Fountain in Wuse 2, or a roundabout with a basketball court in Life Camp, and a demolished one with a football pitch also in Life Camp), were built within the last five years. The Addis Ababa I met less than ten years ago could easily be compared to a city like Kaduna, which tells you how much can change within the span of a single term. Nigeria, after all, is one of the few African countries that can boast of more than 50 urban centres capable of absorbing growth if hold our governors to account. It is also worth noting that some of the world’s most admired cities are not defined by skyscrapers. Cities like Paris and Rome have few to no high-rise buildings, and so does America’s Abuja, Washington, D.C. Yet they rank among the most functional and liveable cities in the world. By contrast, cities like New York and Singapore build vertically because land is a serious constraint. Even Oman, an oil-rich country, has developed without an obsession for shiny skyscrapers. Abuja has, no doubt, suffered from leadership gaps and weak city management in the past. But now Nyesom Wike is doing the Lord’s work. Before him, we had a mannequin in charge of Abuja for eight straight years. In the meantime, enjoy these views of Abuja.
0:16

Abuja is a young city. It was born in 1991, officially. Addis Ababa, by contrast, was born in 1886, making it almost 140 years old. Their age difference is 104 years. Yet the Ethiopian city still parades its fair share of slums, neglected districts, and street beggars. I make this point because you obviously have never been there and have relied on a single image of a country that, just 25 years ago, was the third-poorest country in the world, to mock your nation’s capital. And that even revealed a rather narrow idea of what a city should look like. A city is not measured by the presence of tall, shiny buildings. Skyscrapers are not a universal marker of urban success, nor should they be a priority for Abuja. They are largely a response to population density and land scarcity. We think Abuja suffers from these because we have not had an FCT minister with city-planning skills in a long time. Land is not a scarce commodity here. What the city needs is functional infrastructure that allows for orderly expansion and eases demographic pressure on its existing districts, not vertical congestion for its own sake. The irony is that most of the shiny edifices you now see in Addis Ababa, including that green roundabout you think is the hallmark of a modern city (as if we don’t have Unity Fountain in Wuse 2, or a roundabout with a basketball court in Life Camp, and a demolished one with a football pitch also in Life Camp), were built within the last five years. The Addis Ababa I met less than ten years ago could easily be compared to a city like Kaduna, which tells you how much can change within the span of a single term. Nigeria, after all, is one of the few African countries that can boast of more than 50 urban centres capable of absorbing growth if hold our governors to account. It is also worth noting that some of the world’s most admired cities are not defined by skyscrapers. Cities like Paris and Rome have few to no high-rise buildings, and so does America’s Abuja, Washington, D.C. Yet they rank among the most functional and liveable cities in the world. By contrast, cities like New York and Singapore build vertically because land is a serious constraint. Even Oman, an oil-rich country, has developed without an obsession for shiny skyscrapers. Abuja has, no doubt, suffered from leadership gaps and weak city management in the past. But now Nyesom Wike is doing the Lord’s work. Before him, we had a mannequin in charge of Abuja for eight straight years. In the meantime, enjoy these views of Abuja.

Gimba Kakanda

185,783 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1.⁠ Trump announced he had moved 2 nuclear submarines into position after ex-Russian president Dmitry Medvedev called Trump’s threat to sanction Russia over Ukraine a “step towards war.” 2.⁠ Viktor Vodolatsky, a senior Russian lawmaker, shrugged it off - saying those subs have “been in the crosshairs for a long time.” He said no Russian response is needed - because they already control the waters Trump is targeting. 3.⁠ Trump fired labor statistics chief Erika McEntarfer hours after data showed jobs growth slowed. He claimed: “Today’s Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.” 4.⁠ Epstein’s co-conspirator in sex trafficking, Ghislaine Maxwell, was moved to a cushy minimum-security prison in Texas following her meetings with Deputy AG Todd Blanche (Trump's former criminal lawyer). The timing caused alarm as rumours swirl that Trump may be considering pardoning her. 5.⁠ SpaceX launched NASA’s Crew-11 to the International Space Station aboard Dragon Endeavour. They’ll spend the next 6-8 months on board conducting experiments before splashing down off California. 6.⁠ Ukraine continued its strikes on Russia’s energy infrastructure, hitting the Novokuybyshevsk oil refinery with drones, causing a massive explosion. 7.⁠ SpaceX lit up Starship for a full-duration static fire before its test launch, scheduled for mid-August. All Raptor engines ignited while the vehicle stayed clamped to the pad, simulating real flight conditions without liftoff. 8.⁠ Trump said Brazilian President Lula can “talk to me anytime he wants,” brushing off tensions over tariffs and sanctions. He praised Brazilians but blasted the current government, accusing it of targeting Bolsonaro. 9.⁠ The Corporation for Public Broadcasting will shut down in January after Congress voted to strip over $500 million in funding. The move ends CPB’s role in supporting NPR, PBS, and hundreds of local stations, especially in rural areas. Sesame Street survives - but not for everyone. 10.⁠ The Grand Canyon mega fire has scorched over 112,000 acres so far, as it shows no sign of stopping. Dragon Bravo Fire has become the 10th largest in Arizona history, burning so hot it generates its own weather systems.
0:14

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1.⁠ Trump announced he had moved 2 nuclear submarines into position after ex-Russian president Dmitry Medvedev called Trump’s threat to sanction Russia over Ukraine a “step towards war.” 2.⁠ Viktor Vodolatsky, a senior Russian lawmaker, shrugged it off - saying those subs have “been in the crosshairs for a long time.” He said no Russian response is needed - because they already control the waters Trump is targeting. 3.⁠ Trump fired labor statistics chief Erika McEntarfer hours after data showed jobs growth slowed. He claimed: “Today’s Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.” 4.⁠ Epstein’s co-conspirator in sex trafficking, Ghislaine Maxwell, was moved to a cushy minimum-security prison in Texas following her meetings with Deputy AG Todd Blanche (Trump's former criminal lawyer). The timing caused alarm as rumours swirl that Trump may be considering pardoning her. 5.⁠ SpaceX launched NASA’s Crew-11 to the International Space Station aboard Dragon Endeavour. They’ll spend the next 6-8 months on board conducting experiments before splashing down off California. 6.⁠ Ukraine continued its strikes on Russia’s energy infrastructure, hitting the Novokuybyshevsk oil refinery with drones, causing a massive explosion. 7.⁠ SpaceX lit up Starship for a full-duration static fire before its test launch, scheduled for mid-August. All Raptor engines ignited while the vehicle stayed clamped to the pad, simulating real flight conditions without liftoff. 8.⁠ Trump said Brazilian President Lula can “talk to me anytime he wants,” brushing off tensions over tariffs and sanctions. He praised Brazilians but blasted the current government, accusing it of targeting Bolsonaro. 9.⁠ The Corporation for Public Broadcasting will shut down in January after Congress voted to strip over $500 million in funding. The move ends CPB’s role in supporting NPR, PBS, and hundreds of local stations, especially in rural areas. Sesame Street survives - but not for everyone. 10.⁠ The Grand Canyon mega fire has scorched over 112,000 acres so far, as it shows no sign of stopping. Dragon Bravo Fire has become the 10th largest in Arizona history, burning so hot it generates its own weather systems.

Mario Nawfal

841,322 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten