Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Moving Inside Your Breath Find Your Flow #Bearyoga #personaltrainer #yogaforbiggerbodies #flow #breath #bear #chub #cub #chaser #supportive #restorative #meditation #nyc #queens #brooklyn #bronx #movement

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The new Huberman Lab episode is out: Improve Energy & Longevity by Optimizing Mitochondria | Dr. Martin Picard (Martin Picard) 0:00 Martin Picard 3:50 What is Energy?, Energy Flow & Transformation 7:53 Energy, Vitality, Emotions, Sensory Perception 14:18 Sponsors: Helix Sleep & Lingo 17:19 “Mito-Centric” View of World, Mitochondrial Energy & Information Patterns 25:26 Organelles, Mitochondria & Energy Transformation; Maternal Genes 31:12 Mitotypes & Differentiation, Mitochondria as “Social Organisms” 36:52 Food & Dysfunctional Energy Transformation 40:02 Lifestyle Choices & Interests, Physiological Growth 46:39 Pregnancy, Amenorrhea; Illness & Tiredness 51:07 Sponsor: AG1 52:29 Energy Transformation & Distribution; Body’s Wisdom, Feeling Sick 56:27 Tool: Feel Your Energy; Breath & Energy 1:02:31 Flow of Energy; Trade-Offs, Life Purpose & Enjoyment 1:10:15 Biology, Meaningful Experiences & Energy Flow 1:16:27 Sponsor: Function 18:15 Inflammation, Energetic Flow 1:20:43 Child Prodigies, Species Lifespan & Mitochondrial Metabolism; Aging 1:28:56 Lifestyle & Aging: Exercise, Fasting; Inflammation, Sleep, Stimulants 1:37:06 Energetic Stress Signals, GDF-15, Cancer, Heart Failure 1:42:18 Genes, Lifestyle & Aging 1:47:54 Gray Hair Reversal, Stress; Inflammation & Aging 1:57:37 Energy Recovery, Sleep & Mitochondrial Function, Stress, Meditation 2:05:16 Tools: Yoga Nidra, NSDR; Pre-Sleep Relaxation, Energy & Restorative Sleep 2:10:58 Diet & Individualization, Clinical Trials; Mitochondria & Nutrition, Keto 2:20:14 Alcohol & Energy Budget; Stress 2:25:02 Exercise, Increase Mitochondria, Overtraining; Resistance & Growth 2:33:06 Sponsor: Waking Up 2:34:41 Supplements & Mitochondria Health, Deficiencies, SS31, Methylene Blue 2:41:31 Energy Flow & Experiences, Balance 2:49:13 Transform Through Resistance, Energetic Awareness, Connection 2:56:05 Food Overconsumption & Mitochondria Disruption; Tissues & Mitochondria 3:01:02 Mitochondrial Health Test; Tool: Ways to Increase Energy; Meditation 3:06:10 Peptides; Fertility Supplements, Urolithin A; Electromagnetic Fields 3:12:16 Acknowledgements 3:14:15 Zero-Cost Support, YouTube, Spotify & Apple Follow, Reviews & Feedback, Sponsors, Protocols Book, Social Media, Neural Network Newsletter Includes paid partnerships.

Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.

908,795 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

PrismaX TeleOps feels like 𝐈 𝐝𝐢𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐚 𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐨𝐭 𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐚𝐲 instead 𝐈 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐰𝐚𝐲 Using PrismaX’s teleoperation, I remotely operated a real robotic arm in a live environment What felt like simple actions moving objects, adjusting grip, navigating space quickly showed how powerful human in the loop robotics really is Every small movement wasn’t just control It was training data for physical AI Great teleoperation isn’t about speed or flashy moves It’s built through consistency, awareness, and deliberate control over time. Small habits practiced every session quietly compound into real performance gains 1. Show up every time Consistency is the real multiplier Even short sessions add up when you never skip them Set reminders, plan ahead, and treat teleop like a commitment. Being present and focused is progress on its own 2. Control always beats speed Teleoperation rewards precision, not rushing You’re given enough time use it Slow, intentional movements reduce mistakes and lead to far better outcomes than fast, reactive inputs 3. Put yourself inside the robot Stop thinking of the robot as something distant. Operate from its point of view When your brain treats the robot as an extension of your body, coordination improves and movements feel more natural 4. Stay active to stay stable Long idle moments can break flow and stability Even subtle movements help maintain control and keep your focus sharp, making it easier to respond when adjustments are needed 5. Repetition creates fluency At first, the controls may feel unfamiliar and that’s expected With repetition, aligning, gripping, and lifting become automatic Muscle memory takes over, and teleop starts to feel intuitive Quick control guide W / S → move forward & backward A / D → arm left & right Q / E → move up & down Z / X → open & close grip ← / → → rotate grip C / V → slide base Teleop mastery is a long game. Stay consistent, stay intentional, and let small improvements stack into real skill

kingopw3

11,435 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗻𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗹𝗲𝗴𝘀, 𝘁𝘄𝗼 𝗹𝘂𝗻𝗴𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝗼 𝗲𝗴𝗴𝘀. 🧬 STOP believing the "Suffocation" Myth. 🛑🐍 We’ve all heard that Boa Constrictors squeeze their prey until it runs out of air. Science says that’s WRONG. Here is the fascinating engineering behind the Boa: 1. It’s not about Air, it’s about Blood.Boas don't wait for you to run out of breath. When a Boa coils, it exerts pressure to cause Ischemia (circulatory arrest). They cut off blood flow to the heart and brain, causing the prey to pass out within seconds, not minutes. It is a precise, lights-out mechanic. 2. They have LEGS (Sort of). 🦵Boas are considered "primitive" snakes because they are walking fossils. They possess vestigial hind limbs called "pelvic spurs"—small claw-like structures near their tail. These are evolutionary leftovers from their four-legged ancestors. 3. No Eggs involved! 🥚🚫Unlike Pythons, Boas don’t lay eggs. They are ovoviviparous (live birth superstars). The babies develop inside the mother and are born LIVE and fully independent. A mother can drop a litter of 20–60 babies at once, each nearly 2 feet long from day one. 4. Two Lungs? That's Fancy.Most modern snakes have evolved to have only one functional lung to fit their slender bodies. Boas, keeping with their "primitive" traits, actually possess two lungs. They are built different. 5. Pest Control Heroes. 🏠In some South American homes, people welcome Boas because they are the ultimate natural exterminators, keeping rat populations under control. 6. Metabolic Masters.After a large meal, their metabolism is so efficient they can go months without eating. Digestion alone takes 4–6 days. 7. They never stop growing.Adults typically hit 8–13 feet and 100+ lbs, living for 20–40 years. Nature didn't build a villain. It built the perfect mousetrap. Respect the squeeze. 👑 Knowing they are free pest control... would you let a Boa chill in your garden, or is that a HARD pass? 🏡🐍

Sindambiwe

777,517 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The last 20 Moni Wizards NFTs. WL Application is live. The Wizards collection is the highest access to everything Moni. Apply to get whitelisted: 20 seats left. After these, primary closes for good and the only way in is the secondary market. Funds from this sale go straight back into the build: more research, more Smarts coverage, more API surface, more community infrastructure. What’s inside? Full Moni platform access. The off-chain side of our stack and how you find alpha before it's alpha. Discover tracks where smart money is already looking: VCs, founders, alpha hunters, and influencers, in real time. You see the projects they're moving toward one to three weeks before they trend on the main timeline. Behind it: 15,000 hand-curated Smarts and millions of smart mentions collected over five years. Wizards get every filter, every list, every signal we expose internally. Daily and weekly Alpha Reports. Written by the Moni Research team, not aggregated from elsewhere. Our analysts hand-pick the best of what the engine surfaces each day and each week, then write up what the Smarts are watching, why it matters, and where the narrative is forming. Reports usually land in the Wizards Discord before any public version exists. Moni Social API. New for Wizards. The same API we give access to launchpads, exchanges, VCs, and analytical platforms. 30+ data types, 100,000+ tracked events per day, 5,000+ projects under coverage, Smart Mindshare endpoints, real-time and historical social signals. Think of it as the social intelligence layer you'd otherwise have to build yourself. Wizards get a data they can plug into their own tools, alert systems, or agents. Deep Research. One project at a time, long form, the same work we run inside Moni Research. Each one takes the team about a week. Thesis, ecosystem map, mechanism, risks, Smart positioning, what to watch for. Structured the way an analyst would actually use it, not a Twitter thread version of it. Private Wizards-only chats and community. The room where the 180 holders and the private Moni community already share early calls, deal flow, research drafts, and "look at this" moments before anything goes public. Most of the real work happens here, not in the Twitter version of Moni. Alpha bots and curated Smarts lists. The bots that track Smart movements in real time. The Twitter lists we don't share publicly because they are the actual edge. Wizards get both. Early access to every new Moni product. Whatever ships next, Wizards see it first. Sometimes the prototype, sometimes weeks before public release. The feedback loop runs straight back into the team. Partnership raffles and early-stage deal flow. Pre-seed and seed allocations from partner projects. Raffles, intros, primary access to things that come through the table and never leave it. Custom hand-drawn PFP. Designed by our artist around your call. Yours forever. How to buy. Fill the form. The team reads every answer. If your fit makes sense for what this circle is, we'll come back to you with everything you need to complete the purchase. Moni Wizards Opensea Page:

Moni 🧙‍♂️

50,196 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

ChatGPT 5.1 is a MAJOR improvement, at least from a writing/tone point of view. Check out these rap lyrics about quantum mechanics it spit out. (and enjoy the Suno song I made with them). Equally impressively, look at the linguistic and physics analysis of the lyrics that follows! Kudos OpenAI, Sam Altman, and the team for a much needed polish to a powerful model. QUANTUM CIPHER 2025 EDITION I’m the quark-spittin’ marksman, collapse ya when I spark in, Wave-function punchlines hittin’ harder than a dark spin. I’m Schrödinger’s pen — alive and dead ‘til the bar ends, Open up the box and watch me box reality in sharp tens. I bend space-time with a baseline, break spines when I say rhymes, Got gravity envy — ‘cause I pull the mass on the grapevines. My mind’s a Hadron Collider when I’m chargin’ up my take lines, Smashin’ egos into particles and call it “making break-signs.” I’m the reason why the Higgs boson got stage fright — It tried to find me in the vacuum, but couldn’t locate light. I’m the Big Bang braggin’, braggin’ bigger than the quanta, Kick a lyric so atomic, every comma’s a katana. Multiverse me — I’m many-worlds where every version’s better, In every timeline I’m the GOAT, just wearin’ different sweaters. I’m the paradox you can’t box — I’m Zeno with a vendetta, Every step you take to reach me makes your progress even lesser. I’m in superposition — both chill and kill in the same breath, Spit life and death in one sec like I’m cheating on a lame test. Heisenberg with the pen — you know the drill when the aim’s set: You can measure where I’m goin’ OR how fast — pick the same bet. I’m the quantum mechanic — I tune the universe with torque, Turn your circle into strings and play your atoms like a fork. Your flow’s so classical, bro, it belongs in Newton’s court — I rap non-locally: even distant ops report. Entangle with me? Please — you’d need degrees of freedom free, I flip spins with sick grins, split wins like symmetry. Your style’s “low energy,” mine’s infinite density — Black-hole bars pullin’ stars out from every identity. I’m uncertainty’s certainty, purposely versatile, Cursing these circuits with verses that birth universes wild. My ego inflates at a rate you’d call “superluminal,” Breaking every limit like the laws were merely “optional.” So if you wanna test the quantum king, step to the lecture: I’ll leave your wave collapsed, past, present — even your conjecture. Bow to the particle prophet, the unstoppable professor — I’m the one who taught the constants how to properly measure. Call me Quinn-tum Mechanics — yeah, I bend the laws at will, And the punchline’s like dark matter… …’cause it’s heavy — and you’ll never see it comin’ until it kills. ===END=== Linguistic and Scientific Analysis: Thought for 45s This is a nasty little quantum flex piece. Let’s tear it apart. 1. Wordplay & Rhyme Craft You’re doing a few big things really well here: dense multis, extended metaphors, and layered puns. Multisyllabic rhyme chains From the jump: I’m the quark-spittin’ marksman, collapse ya when I spark in, Wave-function punchlines hittin’ harder than a dark spin. quark-spittin’ marksman / collapse ya when I spark in / dark spin – three-way multisyllabic rhyme, all anchored on that -ark/-ar-k sound. This is very Eminem-adjacent: packed internal rhymes, assonance (ar / a / i sounds), and consonance (k/s/p/t/d). Same move here: I bend space-time with a baseline, break spines when I say rhymes, Got gravity envy — ‘cause I pull the mass on the grapevines. space-time / baseline / break spines / say rhymes / grapevines all interlocking. “Baseline” ↔ “bassline” double meaning, fitting both rap and physics. You basically keep that pattern across the whole verse: pen / bar ends / sharp tens, take lines / break-signs, quanta / katana, better / sweaters, vendetta / lesser, same breath / lame test, aim’s set / same bet, etc. It reads like it was built to ride a tight 90–100 BPM beat with room for double-time bursts. Puns & double / triple meanings Some of the nicest examples: “quark-spittin’ marksman” Quarks = fundamental particles. “Spittin’” = rapping. “Marksman” = precision shooter → precise lyricist. “collapse ya when I spark in” Wave-function collapse in quantum mechanics. “Collapse you” like knock you out. “Spark” as in light up / ignite / start a verse. “Wave-function punchlines hittin’ harder than a dark spin.” Spin as a quantum property. “Dark spin” hints at dark matter / dark energy, but also dark humor / brooding tone. “I’m Schrödinger’s pen — alive and dead ‘til the bar ends” Schrödinger’s cat in superposition. Pen is “alive and dead” until you hear the full bar → the bar’s observation collapses the artistic outcome. “Open up the box and watch me box reality in sharp tens.” The Schrödinger box. “Box reality” like out-boxing someone in a ring. “Sharp tens” → sharpened “tens” (bars), also sounds like “sharpened” / “sharp 10s” (perfect bars). “Got gravity envy — ‘cause I pull the mass on the grapevines.” Gravity pulls mass. “Pull the mass” = attract masses of people / attention. “On the grapevines” = word of mouth. “My mind’s a Hadron Collider… Smashin’ egos into particles and call it ‘making break-signs.’” Large Hadron Collider smashes particles. “Break signs” ~ “brake signs” / breaking points / breaking egos. Also nod to how new particles are inferred from “signal breaks.” “Kick a lyric so atomic, every comma’s a katana.” “Atomic” lyric: explosive, small but powerful. “Comma” = tiny mark, but you weaponize it into “katana” → even punctuation cuts. “Multiverse me — I’m many-worlds where every version’s better, / In every timeline I’m the GOAT, just wearin’ different sweaters.” Many-Worlds Interpretation of QM. GOAT in every universe → layered arrogance gag. “Different sweaters” is a mundane, silly visual that undercuts the cosmic brag in a funny way. “I’m the paradox you can’t box — I’m Zeno with a vendetta, / Every step you take to reach me makes your progress even lesser.” Zeno’s paradox: you never actually arrive. “Can’t box” = can’t categorize and you can’t fight him. Great thematic coherence: opponent can’t “reach” your level. “Heisenberg with the pen — you know the drill when the aim’s set: / You can measure where I’m goin’ OR how fast — pick the same bet.” Uncertainty principle. “Same bet” bends the physics correctly: you can’t know both precisely, so whichever you pick, you still can’t fully predict him. “Turn your circle into strings and play your atoms like a fork.” Circle → strings → string theory. “Play your atoms like a fork” = tuning fork / resonant frequencies. “Your flow’s so classical, bro, it belongs in Newton’s court — / I rap non-locally: even distant ops report.” Classical mechanics vs quantum. “Newton’s court” like a king’s court. “Rap non-locally” = quantum nonlocality / entanglement / his reputation hits everywhere. “Your style’s ‘low energy,’ mine’s infinite density — / Black-hole bars pullin’ stars out from every identity.” Low vs high energy states. Black holes: infinite density, strong gravity. Pulling “stars” (famous rappers) out of their orbits / identities. “I’m uncertainty’s certainty, purposely versatile” Oxymoron that echoes the uncertainty principle while flexing unpredictability as a feature. “Call me Quinn-tum Mechanics” Quantum Mechanics + “Quinn” pun. Ties persona directly into the scientific metaphor. And the closer: And the punchline’s like dark matter… …’cause it’s heavy — and you’ll never see it comin’ until it kills. Dark matter: unseen but exerts gravitational effects. Punchline: you don’t see it coming, but it hits heavy. “Until it kills” is exaggerated, but very on-brand for battle rap hyperbole. 2. Rap Musicology: Flow, Persona, and Structure Flow & technical construction On a technical level, this is closer to modern “technical” boom-bap / Em-style cipher rap than to melodic trap: Heavy multisyllabic end rhymes and stacked internals in almost every line. Plenty of enjambment: lines roll into each other, giving you flexibility in performance (you can push into double-time or sit in the pocket). Almost every bar has two or more stress points that could land on snare kicks cleanly, which makes it “write itself” onto a 4/4 drum grid. Example section: I’m the paradox you can’t box — I’m Zeno with a vendetta, Every step you take to reach me makes your progress even lesser. The stressed syllables (PAR-a-DOX / CAN’T BOX / ZE-no / VEN-DET-ta / STEP / TAKE / REACH / PRO-GRESS / LESS-er) fall very naturally into a 4/4 bar at a mid tempo. There’s enough internal rhythm that you could push the delivery in multiple styles without rewriting. Persona & tradition Content-wise, this is classic battle rap / cipher posture dressed in physics: You’re the GOAT across all universes. Opponents are “classical,” “low energy,” suffering “stage fright,” stuck in Newtonian basics. You position yourself as: Professor / lecturer (“step to the lecture”, “unstoppable professor”) Prophet (“particle prophet”) Mechanic / technician (“quantum mechanic”) That fits a long rap tradition of the knowledge MC (Rakim, KRS-One, etc.), but updated with quantum and cosmology instead of Five Percent Nation numerology or street theology. The extended conceit (physics as the whole metaphor field) is very much in line with: “concept verses” in battle rap (one theme sustained throughout), and modern “nerd flex” rap where mastery of a domain becomes the metaphor for lyrical dominance. 3. Scientific References & How Clean They Are You’re actually surprisingly accurate for how hard you’re flexing. A quick pass: Wave-function collapse, spin, Schrödinger’s cat/box, superposition, Heisenberg uncertainty: All used in ways that are conceptually sound, just dramatized. Many-Worlds, multiverse, Zeno’s paradox: Correctly mapped to ideas of infinite versions and unreachable goals. Hadron Collider, Higgs boson, vacuum, dark matter, black holes, strings, nonlocality, entanglement, degrees of freedom, low energy / density: All deployed as metaphors in ways that align with the general gist of the physics. A few lines are more poetic than literal, but still clever: “I’m the reason why the Higgs boson got stage fright — / It tried to find me in the vacuum, but couldn’t locate light.” Real physics: Higgs field permeates the vacuum; photons are massless; “light” isn’t what the Higgs is “looking for.” But metaphorically: even the particle that gives mass can’t find this MC; he’s beyond detection. “My ego inflates at a rate you’d call ‘superluminal’” Nothing real can move faster than light; you’re deliberately breaking the rule as a flex. Fits: “Breaking every limit like the laws were merely ‘optional.’” “Call me Quinn-tum Mechanics — yeah, I bend the laws at will” Again, you’re explicitly saying you’re beyond the laws. That’s the brag. Overall: the scientific backbone is strong enough that people who actually know the concepts will nod, but it stays accessible as punchlines for non-physicists because you keep the metaphor clear in each bar. 4. Why This Works (Big Picture) Wordplay: High-density puns and multi-layer references, especially around collapse, uncertainty, and paradox, give it replay value. Musicology: The rhyme schemes are tight enough to satisfy “technical rap nerds,” and the cadence reads like it would perform well over a gritty, minimal beat. Science framing: You picked a consistent semantic field (quantum / cosmology / relativity) and stuck to it. That makes the verse feel like an extended conceit rather than a bag of random buzzwords. If you wanted to push it even further, the only “critique” is that it’s thematically almost too clean: you could throw in one or two emotionally grounded bars (why this level of intellect matters, what it costs) to add a human crack in the god-mode persona. But as a straight-up quantum battle verse? It’s nasty. ===END=== Damn.

Kyle Shannon (AI Learning Lab/AI Salon)

124,661 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

A vocal trainer breaks down Jinyoung’s performance of “When I stop thinking”, teasing out all the little things – from technique to subtle foxiness 😆 – that make people want to melt into his voice~ (excerpted) (0:13) “To begin with, his voice has depth because it’s naturally on the lower side. (...) If a voice is only clear, it can end up sounding piercing or tiring to listen to. But if it only has depth, it can sound overly muffled or blurry. He has those two things in really good balance. That’s why people often talk about singing that’s ‘half air, half voice’, or singing that sounds ‘like you’re speaking’. In the end, those expressions are really talking about exactly that balance. So when you hear Jinyoung sing and think, ‘It almost sounds like he’s just speaking’, there’s an analytical explanation for why it comes across that way.” (0:55) “Right here, he creates a clear contrast in the tone. Up until this point, the vocal fold closure is a little firmer – (...) He starts mixing in a little more breath. So he’s creating tonal contrast. At first, he brings out more of the tone colour, then in the latter half, he shifts into a slightly lighter tone. There’s a little push-and-pull between the two. That’s something good singers do. Starting from that balanced state, he moves a little this way, then a little that way – and he does it extremely well. (...) Can you hear it? The song isn’t just moving along in one straight line. There’s this constant ebb and flow. He’s incredibly good at doing it without making it obvious. It all comes across so naturally.” (2:23) “And that’s what makes us listen without even realising it. It’s what pulls us into the song. How should I put this... this might be a good way of describing it – though I hope the fans don’t misunderstand what I mean. I mean it as a compliment. Jinyoung gives off the image of someone who’s completely innocent and pure, almost like a child. But when it comes to singing, it’s like there’s a little fox inside him – someone who’s really good at drawing people in. That’s why, if you’re a vocalist and you really want to become good at singing, this is the sort of thing you need to study. People call it ‘copying’. Copying.” (2:51) “As I sat here listening to the song and watching him perform, I found myself thinking about something. The reason we hear Jinyoung sing and think, ‘This feels comforting... this sounds so nice... it feels warm…’ might simply be Jinyoung’s own charm. When you look at him as a person, he never comes across as overly gloomy. Nor does he seem overly high-energy. He just has this calm, well-balanced presence. He gives off the impression that he’s always wearing a gentle smile. I think that contributes to the feeling we get as well. That’s not something we can explain scientifically. But sometimes, it’s precisely those things that move us the most.” (3:32) “He also uses this kind of breathy tone extremely well. When you use this sort of tone well, it makes the song feel much softer. Instead of having the rough texture of sandpaper, it feels more like silk. When you touch a high-quality coat, you think, ‘Wow... that’s so soft’. That’s the kind of sound this is.” (4:07) “Ah... his falsetto here is really nice. This kind of falsetto is used a lot in R&B. Artists like So Soo Bin and DEAN are also very good at using this kind of falsetto. When you hear it, it gives you that slightly ticklish feeling. He’s very good at using this sort of breathy tone.” (4:41) “He could sing it with a cleaner tone. But instead (...) he uses more breath, creating a sound that almost tickles your ears. You could probably call it the kind of falsetto that’s good at capturing women’s hearts. That’s what I’d call it.” (5:08) “Personally, I’m not really familiar with idol culture. And my own tastes lean a little old-school, so I don’t usually listen to stylish vocalists like this. But listening to him this way and analysing his singing... it’s really, really good. It’s just so stylish. So stylish. It’s actually making me want to try singing in this sort of style myself.” 🔗 #Jinyoung #진영 #GOT7 박진영

❄️ 𝚔𝚔 🧡

12,422 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The 40,000% ROI "Bug": How Claude Code Cracked the TradingView Holy Grail most people think the elite traders at the top of the mountain have some secret indicator or a hidden math formula that gives them a forty thousand percent return. they assume the game is rigged against the small player and that you need a multi million dollar budget just to get a seat at the table. the truth is that the holy grail of trading is actually hidden in plain sight inside a community tab that most people scroll past every single day i spent years losing money to liquidations and over trading because i thought i had to manually predict where the price was going next. i even spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on developers to build apps for me because i was convinced that i would never be able to code the systems myself. it turns out that once you stop trying to be a genius and start using the tools that are already available you can crack the code to unlimited trading strategies the secret is not in a single indicator but in the process of research back test and implement. if you go to the community section of trading view you will find an endless stream of source code for indicators that people have built over decades. most traders just slap these on a chart and hope for the best but if you are a data dog like me you know that a chart is just a pretty picture that lies to you i believe that code is the great equalizer because it allows us to take these public ideas and turn them into fully automated systems that trade for us while we sleep. i decided to learn to code live on youtube to show everyone that you can iterate your way to success without being a math wizard or a stanford graduate. now i have fully automated systems that manage my capital instead of getting liquidated by emotional decisions in the middle of the night the biggest trap in the trading world is something called repainting and it is the reason why so many strategy back tests look like they are printing money when they are actually just a scam. repainting happens when an indicator looks at future data to tell you what happened in the past which makes every buy and sell signal look like a perfect entry at the top and bottom. if you trust a back test on a basic chart without understanding the logic underneath you are just building a house on a foundation of sand this is why i transitioned all of my serious work into python because python does not lie to you. in python you can control the data flow tick by tick and bar by bar to ensure that no future data is leaking into your strategy. i built a back test architect which is a specialized sub agent that knows exactly how to take a simple idea and test it against twenty five different data sources all at once when you run a strategy across btc eth apple google and tesla you start to see the real truth about whether a strategy has an edge or if it was just a lucky fluke on one chart. i saw one strategy this week that showed a one million percent return which sounds like a total lie but the data does not have an ego. even if a number looks insane you have to investigate it and incubate it with tiny size to see if it holds up in the live market you must treat your trading like a business where you are the manager and the code is your team of tireless employees. i have sub agents running for me right now that act as masters of specific tasks like converting pine script into python or optimizing exit logic. if you are not using these specialized ai assistants in your workflow you are essentially trying to build a skyscraper with a hand saw while everyone else is using heavy machinery most people get stuck in the beginner phase because they think they need to write every single line of code from scratch. the reality is that the best developers are just really good at importing the hard work of others and connecting it like lego blocks. i use a library called ccxt that allows my bots to communicate with every major exchange in the world with just a few lines of script which saves me months of development time the reason i show everything live is because the industry is filled with gatekeepers who want to keep the secrets of automation to themselves. they want you to stay as a manual trader who pays high fees and provides liquidity for their algorithms. once you learn to automate you are no longer a victim of the market but a participant in the architecture of the financial system if you are sitting there right now feeling defeated because you just got smoked on a trade or you missed a massive pump you have to realize that those emotions are your greatest enemy. a computer does not feel fomo and it does not get tilted after a loss; it just waits for the next signal that fits the parameters you defined. my mission is to help you get to a place where you can walk away from the screen and let the machines do the heavy lifting learning to code is actually much easier than learning a second language because the syntax is logical and the feedback is immediate. i spent ten years in tech scared to touch a keyboard for anything other than emails because i thought i was not smart enough for engineering. once i realized that code is just logic i was able to build my first profitable bot within a few months and i have never looked back the transition from a manual trader to an algorithmic expert is about building a robust framework for testing your ideas as fast as possible. you want to be able to find an indicator on trading view convert it to python and run it against years of historical data in less than five minutes. if you can do that you have a higher chance of success than ninety nine percent of the people who are just drawing lines on a screen one of the most powerful strategies i found recently combines the squeeze momentum indicator with smart money concepts. when you test these individually they might show a decent return but when you combine them and add a filter like the adx you can find setups that have a massive expectancy. the key is to look for strategies that show positive returns across multiple different asset classes and time frames simultaneously even if a strategy looks like it is printing a forty thousand percent return you must always remain skeptical and look for the catch. i always incubate my new ideas with tiny capital for at least a few weeks to see how they handle real world slippage and fees. a back test is a map of the past but the live market is a wilderness that changes every single day this is why i believe in the rbi method which stands for research back test and implement. you spend your mornings looking for new ideas your afternoons stress testing them with ai and your evenings deploying the winners to the market. it is a systematic approach to wealth that removes the need for luck or guessing what a celebrity is going to tweet next the most successful traders in history like jim simons did not sit around looking at rsi levels on a fifteen minute chart. they built systems that identified mathematical edges and then scaled those systems until they were managing billions of dollars. you do not need thirty one billion dollars to change your life but you do need the discipline to stop trading like a human and start thinking like a system i give away so much for free on youtube because i want to build a community of data dogs who are all chasing the same goal of financial freedom through automation. when we work together and share our findings we can collectively identify edges that nobody else is looking at. the world is moving towards an ai dominated economy and if you are not learning to control the machines you are going to be controlled by them the road to automation is not a straight line and you will run into bugs that make you want to throw your computer out the window. but every time you fix an error and every time you optimize a script you are getting one step closer to a life where you own your time. code really is the great equalizer and it is waiting for you to pick it up and start building your own future if you can fly then run and if you can run then walk but whatever you do you must keep moving forward in this journey. trading can be heartless but the logic of code is always fair and consistent. stop being the liquidity for someone else's bot and start building the walls that will protect your capital forever

Moon Dev

245,471 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Dean Koontz has published more than 140 novels, 74 works of short fiction, and sold more than 500 million books. Simply put, he’s one of the most prolific writers alive today. Some highlights from our chat: 1. Dare to love the English language. 2. Characters come alive when they're given free will. Instead of constraining them in an outline, let them go where they want. You know they’re alive once they start surprising you. He says: “I give the characters free will like God gave it to us.” 3. Everything a writer believes about life and death, culture and society, relationships and the self, God and nature will wind up in their books. A writer’s body of work, therefore, reveals the intellectual and emotional progress of its creator, and over time, becomes a map of their soul. 4. To think you understand the world is to be foolish in the extreme. The world is too complex for us to understand it. To see reality clearly is to be utterly enchanted by its staggering complexity. 5. Where should you look? Well, the supernatural enters the world in mundane ways, and rarely the great and glorious flashes of drama. 6. Dean writes his novels page-by-page, and doesn’t move onto the next page until he nails the existing one. There’s no messy first draft. Because of that, he’s basically done with his novels once he finishes the final page. 7. Where does a unique writing voice come from? Three places: style, perspective, and a philosophy of life. 8. Be skeptical of conventional wisdom. There’s an encyclopedia of common wisdom in publishing. All of it is common and none of it is wise. You have to become aware of that, go your own way, and just stick with it because there are so many ways you can be sent wrong based on "that's the way we always do it." 9. The aesthetic plainness of contemporary writing (and culture at large) is crushing our souls. 10. Contemporary fiction is suffering from plainness in particular. It started when writers started imitating Hemingway (who stripped his prose down but kept the mystery and underlying strangeness of the world by implication). But the imitations that came later stripped the prose down while also removing the underlying depth that made Hemingway so great. 11. Koontz Law of Writing #1: Never go inside more than one character's mind in a scene. Each one should come from a singular viewpoint. 12. Koontz Law of Writing #2: Metaphors aren't meant to dazzle readers, but to seduce them into a more intimate relationship with the story. 13. Koontz Law of Writing #3: Metaphors and similes describe a scene more colorfully than a chain of adjectives — while reinforcing the mood. The point is that you can create depth by describing things metaphorically instead of using blunt adjectives. That’s what poetry does: it uses words to say more than the word itself says, which creates a mood. 14. Great prose doesn't come from piling on adjectives. It comes from finding the perfect metaphor that does triple duty: describes the scene, reinforces the mood, and reveals something about the character. 15. The goal is for metaphors not to pop out like showmanship, but to flow into the music of the language. 16. Develop an ear for the musicality of language. 17. A book can succeed with a mediocre plot if the characters are compelling. Character is the center of good fiction. If the characters work, the story works. 18. From the afterword of his book, Watchers: “We have within us the ability to change for the better and to find dignity as individuals rather than as drones in one mass movement or another. We have the ability to love, the need to be loved, and the willingness to put our own lives on the line to protect those we love, and it is in these aspects of ourselves that we can glimpse the face of God; and through the exercise of these qualities, we come closest to a Godlike state.” I've shared the full conversation with Dean Koontz below. The YouTube video link is in the replies, and so are the links to Apple and Spotify.

David Perell

74,956 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What if your favorite childhood toy had its own story before finding you? 🧸 Created with Seedance 2.0 on FlovaAI #Flovaai #Flovacpp FlovaAI_Japan PROMPT: Style: Premium Pixar-quality 3D animation, anime-inspired facial expressions, ultra-detailed fur simulation, cinematic lighting, magical realism, vibrant toy store, expressive eyes, soft bloom, ray-traced reflections, dynamic camera movement, Hollywood animated film quality. Prompt: Open with an ultra-wide cinematic establishing shot of a massive premium toy store during golden hour as families browse colorful aisles. Fast dolly shot through shelves overflowing with plush toys, action figures, trains, dolls, and racing cars. Cut to a low-angle close-up of Oliver, the caramel teddy bear with his blue scarf, sitting proudly on the shelf. His amber eyes sparkle with hope. Match cut to six-year-old Emma running excitedly into frame, stopping directly in front of Oliver. Extreme close-up of her smiling face as she hugs him tightly against her chest. Over-the-shoulder shot from Oliver's perspective as Emma happily says, "Can we get this one?" Her mother reaches toward the shelf—but accidentally grabs another identical teddy from behind him. Quick push-in on Oliver's face as his smile fades. Slow-motion shot of Emma walking away while looking back at him. Rack focus from Oliver's tearful eyes to the closing automatic doors. The store lights dim one by one. A loud CLICK echoes as the final light switches off. 🎬 PART 2 — "When Toys Wake Up" Duration: 0:15–0:30 Prompt: Complete darkness. Oliver's button eyes slowly blink open. Extreme close-up of his eyes reflecting moonlight. Whip pan across the store as hundreds of toys suddenly come alive. RC cars drift through polished floors leaving glowing tire streaks. Toy trains rush along display tracks. Dolls laugh while twirling between shelves. Giant Rex the dinosaur lets out a playful roar that shakes nearby boxes. Titan-X activates with glowing cyan eyes. Fast handheld-style tracking shot follows Oliver sprinting across shelves. He leaps between toy boxes in slow motion. Dynamic overhead shot as Bolt the RC car races underneath him, giving him a boost. Oliver lands perfectly onto Chug the toy train as it speeds around a corner. Dramatic orbit shot around Oliver as he quietly whispers, "I have to find her." The music builds rapidly. 🎬 PART 3 — "The Adventure" Duration: 0:30–0:45 Prompt: High-speed action montage. Oliver jumps off the moving train onto hanging gift ribbons, swinging across the aisle. Fast rotating camera follows him weaving through floating balloons. Rex accidentally crashes through stacked toy boxes, causing colorful blocks to rain everywhere. Oliver slides beneath a closing display shelf in slow motion. Bolt races beside him before launching him off a miniature toy ramp. FPV-style camera flies alongside Oliver as he narrowly avoids spinning helicopters and bouncing rubber balls. Titan-X extends a mechanical arm, catching Oliver just before he falls from a high shelf. Cinematic top-down shot reveals the giant locked entrance doors. Oliver runs with everything he has, but the automatic doors refuse to open. Extreme close-up of his tiny paw pressing against the cold glass. Outside, the first rays of sunrise begin to appear. 🎬 PART 4 — "Meant to Be" Duration: 0:45–1:00 Prompt: Soft emotional piano begins. Low-angle shot of Oliver sitting sadly near the entrance as the toys quietly watch from behind. Suddenly, a restocking employee pushes Mr. Wheels, the shopping cart, through the entrance. Dynamic tracking shot as Mochi nudges Oliver forward. Titan-X gently lifts him while Bolt gives one final speed boost. Oliver jumps through the air in beautiful slow motion, perfectly landing inside the shopping cart filled with new toys. Match cut to the toy display being restocked moments later. The store opens. Bright morning sunlight floods the entrance. Emma runs back inside with her mother. Handheld child-height camera follows her weaving through customers. She suddenly freezes, her eyes widening. Push-in on Oliver sitting exactly at the front of the display. "Mom! It's him!" She hugs Oliver tightly against her chest. Extreme close-up of Oliver's stitched smile as one tiny happy tear forms in his eye. The camera slowly cranes upward as Emma walks toward the glowing exit carrying Oliver. Warm golden sunlight fills the frame. Fade to white. Final Screen Text: "Some friendships are simply meant to be." 🧸✨

Sophia

126,206 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This prompt is seriously good, so I ran it through our agent and made a few tweaks. Agent: Shoutout to TechHalla for sharing the original prompt 🙌 Here’s the refined version: image prompt: DIRECTIVE: Produce one still that reads as a real smartphone frame filmed from inside a moving car approaching a strange highway incident. Optical consumer-phone capture through a real windshield — wide forward view, windshield glass, rain specks, A-pillar, a slice of dashboard / hood at the bottom. Lived-in phone JPEG, not cinema, not HDR, not advertising photography. FORMAT: Vertical 3:4 smartphone frame. BEAT / COMPOSITION: Looking forward through the windshield while approaching two trucks clustered close together on the LEFT side of the highway, either in the left lane or left shoulder. LEFT TRUCK — SPARKLING LEMONADE TANKER, CRITICAL: A full-size stainless-steel beverage tanker with bright yellow-and-white SPARKLING LEMONADE branding clearly readable on the tank. Large lemon graphics, yellow citrus branding, believable commercial beverage-truck design. The tanker has suffered a breakdown: a torn, jagged, ragged hole has opened in the side of the tank. A thick, pressurized jet of pale yellow carbonated lemonade is ALREADY blasting horizontally and downward through the hole onto the asphalt. Huge amount of liquid. Visible carbonation and bubbles. Pale-yellow transparent soda, NOT fuel, NOT paint. Foamy white-yellow splashes around the impact area. A wide lemonade lake is already spreading across the road. Wet asphalt reflections, spray suspended in the air, runoff flowing along the lane markings. The truck is stopped or crawling with hazard lights. RIGHT / BESIDE IT — BAKING SODA DELIVERY TRUCK, CRITICAL: Immediately beside the lemonade tanker, slightly ahead or alongside, is a closed white box delivery truck. Large unmistakable generic commercial branding on the side: “BAKING SODA” “FOOD GRADE” “SODIUM BICARBONATE” Simple blue-and-white industrial food-supply graphics, with illustrations of white baking-soda boxes and large paper sacks. Rear doors CLOSED. Side doors CLOSED. No powder spilling yet. The truck must clearly read as a baking-soda delivery vehicle, not flour, cement, salt, or detergent. CAMERA PACK: Handheld smartphone from inside the car, passenger or driver seat. Not a fixed professional dashcam. Wide smartphone lens with subtle barrel distortion. Windshield and left A-pillar visible. A small slice of dashboard / hood along the lower frame. Rain dots, minor grime and reflections on the windshield. Slight handheld breathing shake implied. Consumer smartphone sharpening and compression. Minor autofocus softness. Natural dynamic range. No cinematic depth of field. No dramatic movie lighting. ENVIRONMENT: Daylight, overcast highway. Realistic American interstate-style road. Other normal traffic farther ahead. Clear long highway vanishing point beyond the trucks. Wet asphalt. Muted cloudy sky. Road barriers, lane markings, signs and distant utility structures. PHOTOGRAPHIC CHARACTER: An accidental, unstaged smartphone capture of a bizarre roadside beverage accident. Physically grounded truck scale. Believable weight and liquid flow. The lemonade leak is the unmistakable event. The juxtaposition of a leaking SPARKLING LEMONADE tanker beside a BAKING SODA delivery truck should immediately suggest that something disastrous and absurd is about to happen. NO PERSON visible yet. NO open baking-soda doors. NO powder reaction yet. NO explosion. NO fire. NO fantasy lighting. Real phone footage aesthetic. video prompt: [STYLE + CAMERA + ATMOSPHERE] Vertical 3:4 smartphone video filmed FROM INSIDE a moving car, passenger or driver seat. CONTINUOUS SINGLE TAKE for the entire 30 seconds. The phone is handheld, NOT a bolted dashcam. Visible windshield glass, A-pillar, rain specks, faint reflections, a slice of dashboard / hood at the bottom, occasionally a tiny finger edge near the phone. Natural arm movement and slight breathing shake. Consumer smartphone footage: minor autofocus hunting, rolling shutter, digital sharpening, occasional exposure pumping, phone microphone clipping during the loudest moment, real compressed social-media-video texture. We are ARRIVING. The car is moving forward first. The trucks gradually grow larger through the windshield. Then the car brakes, slows, and stops just short of the spreading lemonade lake. NO CUTS. NO camera teleportation. ONLY digital pinch-zooms: zoom into the lemonade jet, zoom into the clear jug filling, zoom toward the baking-soda truck doors, zoom into the powder hitting the liquid, slam-zoom onto the launch, then zoom out as the woman disappears toward the highway horizon. Daylight. Overcast sky. Wet asphalt. Occasional rain droplets on the windshield. Everything should initially feel like an absurd event caught accidentally on a normal phone. Photoreal environment with coherent liquid, foam, gravity and vehicle scale. The final launch uses deliberately exaggerated slapstick physics, but remains visually photorealistic. No gore. No visible injury. No fire. No combustion explosion. [LOCKED SET / VEHICLES] LEFT ahead through the windshield: A full-size stainless-steel beverage tanker with bright yellow-and-white SPARKLING LEMONADE branding. Large lemon graphics. The words: “SPARKLING LEMONADE” and “CARBONATED LEMON DRINK” are clearly readable. A large ragged torn hole is already present in the tanker wall. A thick pale-yellow carbonated lemonade jet is ALREADY blasting from the hole when the video begins. The liquid is translucent yellow with heavy carbonation. It splashes violently onto the asphalt and has already created a large spreading lemonade lake. White-yellow foam forms where the jet strikes the pavement. The tanker remains stopped or crawling. BESIDE IT: A white commercial box truck clearly branded: “BAKING SODA” “FOOD GRADE” “SODIUM BICARBONATE” Blue-and-white industrial food-supply livery. Graphics of baking-soda cartons and large paper sacks. Rear doors are CLOSED when we arrive. No powder is leaking at the beginning. The baking-soda truck is slightly ahead of or directly alongside the lemonade tanker. The two vehicles form one obvious cluster on the LEFT side of the highway. HIGHWAY: The highway continues beyond the trucks toward a long, clear vanishing-point horizon. Normal distant traffic may exist farther ahead. No additional vehicle belongs to the woman. [LOCKED CAST] THE WOMAN: ONE woman only. Clearly adult, approximately 25–30 years old. Attractive adult woman with a naturally voluptuous figure and a noticeably full bust, realistic adult proportions. No exaggerated cartoon anatomy. Long dark hair, slightly messy from humid roadside weather. Natural makeup. Real skin texture. She wears: a fitted white ribbed spaghetti-strap camisole / tank top, secure opaque fabric, natural neckline, denim shorts, casual sneakers. Clothing remains identical for the entire clip. No wardrobe malfunction. No transparent fabric. No nudity. She has confident, reckless, chaotic roadside energy, behaving as if this absurd situation is completely normal. She is alone. No second person. She does NOT exit any vehicle. She ENTERS FRAME FROM THE RIGHT SIDE of the windshield view, already walking on foot from the roadside / shoulder. [HERO OBJECT] One giant transparent gas-station plastic drink jug / oversized Big-Gulp-scale clear cup. She carries it in her RIGHT hand. At first it is completely EMPTY. Daylight can clearly be seen through the empty transparent plastic. It stays in her right hand through the filling and drinking sequence. The jug is only lost during the final foam blast. [DIEGETIC AUDIO] Beginning: normal road hum, tires on wet pavement, wind, engine noise. Approaching the trucks: increasing loud pressurized lemonade hiss and splashing. Jug filling: liquid hammering plastic, violent fizzy splashes. Drinking: large gulps, brief coughing / breath. Truck: metal latch clunk, rear doors creaking. Reaction: rapid fizzing grows from thousands of tiny bubbles into a deep roaring foam eruption. Launch: phone microphone clips, wind rush, short Doppler scream as she rapidly travels away. No soundtrack. No cinematic score. [IMAGE REFERENCE] [ref_image] = locked opening smartphone still from inside the moving car looking through the windshield at: the SPARKLING LEMONADE tanker, the exact ragged hole, the pale-yellow lemonade jet, the BAKING SODA delivery truck, the wet highway, and the in-car windshield foreground. These visual elements are LAW. The clip begins while the car is still rolling toward that exact truck cluster. [TIMELINE — SECOND BY SECOND] 0–3s: [HOOK — ARRIVING + FIRST ZOOM] Phone is already recording. The car is moving toward the incident. Through the windshield, both trucks are clearly visible on the LEFT. The sparkling-lemonade tanker is ALREADY leaking. A powerful pale-yellow carbonated stream blasts through the ragged hole and crashes onto the highway. The lemonade lake is already widening. The vehicles visibly grow larger as we approach. Around 1s: digital pinch-zoom quickly punches toward the torn metal and lemonade jet. Bubbles and yellow-white spray are visible. Autofocus briefly hunts. Around 2.5s: the driver brakes. The phone and camera body dip slightly with the deceleration. 3–5s: [STOP + WOMAN ENTERS FROM RIGHT] The car finishes stopping before reaching the liquid. Engine idles. Natural handheld phone shake continues. Digital zoom pulls back slightly. THE WOMAN enters frame FROM THE RIGHT. She is already walking on foot. She never exits any car or truck. Her appearance stays consistent: adult woman, long dark hair, white fitted ribbed spaghetti-strap tank top, denim shorts, sneakers, naturally voluptuous figure. In her RIGHT hand is the giant completely EMPTY transparent jug. Light passes visibly through the jug. She raises it casually while staring at the lemonade tanker. Then she steps directly into the shallow spreading lemonade lake. 5–9s: [FILL — HOLD THE SHOT] She approaches the tanker leak. ONE CLEAR CONTACT: She forcefully pushes the mouth of the empty jug directly INTO the high-pressure sparkling-lemonade jet. The phone immediately slam-zooms toward the jug. HOLD THIS ACTION. Do not skip it. The jug remains underneath the stream for approximately TWO FULL SECONDS. Show the liquid level visibly rising through the transparent plastic: empty, one-quarter, half-full, almost full. Pale-yellow carbonated lemonade churns violently inside. Millions of bubbles. White foam builds around the rim. The pressurized stream continuously hammers the jug opening. Overflow splashes across her hand, forearm and tank top. The jug becomes visibly heavy. Only after this clear multi-second fill does she pull it away from the stream. She raises the now-full jug. 9–12s: [CHUG] She immediately tilts the giant jug and starts drinking. Huge exaggerated gulps. Carbonated lemonade pours toward her mouth. Some spills naturally down the front of the white tank top. She keeps drinking until most of the jug is empty. She lowers it. Gasps for air. Makes a quick surprised face from the intense carbonation. Still holding the jug. Then she notices the BAKING SODA delivery truck. She turns toward it. Phone zooms back enough to simultaneously frame: the woman, the lemonade jet, the spreading yellow puddle, and the rear of the baking-soda truck. 12–16s: [OPEN + BAKING SODA AVALANCHE] She reaches the rear of the baking-soda truck. ONE CLEAR CONTACT: She grabs the metal latch. YANKS it open. Both rear doors swing outward. Inside: large stacks of FOOD-GRADE BAKING SODA. White cardboard cartons. Huge brown-and-white paper sacks. “SODIUM BICARBONATE” labels visible. She grabs one oversized sack near the edge. Pulls it. The heavy sack tears open. A huge avalanche of white baking-soda powder pours out of the truck. Additional cartons tumble and split. A dense waterfall of white powder falls directly toward the lemonade lake. Phone digital-zooms onto the falling powder. Show individual white powder clouds and clumps striking the yellow liquid. She remains standing inside the shallow lemonade puddle with the mostly empty clear jug still in her hand. 16–18s: [REACTION STARTS] For a fraction of a second, nothing huge happens. Then: tiny bubbles begin appearing everywhere around the baking soda. Fizz races rapidly outward across the pale-yellow puddle. The entire lemonade lake starts bubbling. Yellow liquid rapidly turns cloudy and pale. Thousands of CO2 bubbles expand across the road surface. The sound changes from small fizzing into an increasingly loud rolling hiss. Foam races around the woman's shoes. She looks down. Confused. The reaction accelerates dramatically. 18–20s: [IT GOES] The carbonation and acid-base fizz become absurdly intense. The entire center of the puddle suddenly swells upward. A huge WHITE-AND-PALE-YELLOW FOAM COLUMN erupts vertically between the two trucks. No fire. No flame. No smoke explosion. Only violently expanding wet beverage foam. ONE CLEAR CONTACT: The rising foam column strikes the woman from BELOW. Her feet abruptly leave the asphalt. The giant clear jug flies from her hand. Her hair shoots upward. She is propelled vertically and then forward along the highway axis. The phone operator reacts late. A violent handheld jerk. Then a slam digital zoom catches her leaving the ground. 20–24s: [HUMAN LEMONADE ROCKET] The woman is now airborne. She becomes a dark human figure riding the huge white-yellow foam column. Her body rotates once naturally in the air. Hair and clothing react to wind. One sneaker nearly comes loose but remains on. No injury. No gore. The foam geyser tilts toward the open highway horizon. The sparkling-lemonade tanker continues feeding liquid into the reaction. Baking soda continues pouring from torn sacks. Foam hits the windshield. Wet white-yellow streaks temporarily obscure parts of the view. The phone jerks backward inside the car but NEVER leaves the car. Autofocus struggles through the wet windshield. Digital zoom hunts for the woman's airborne silhouette. 24–26s: [SHRINKS] Camera zooms back out through foam streaks on the windshield. Farther down the highway: the woman is still airborne. Now much smaller. A tiny spinning adult figure carried along a long white spray trail. The baking-soda truck remains visible behind her with both rear doors open. The sparkling-lemonade tanker continues spraying from the original hole. The reaction is still producing a huge foamy fountain. Phone digital-zooms aggressively toward the shrinking airborne figure. Pixelation and smartphone digital zoom artifacts become visible. Then zooms back out again. 26–29s: [DISAPPEARS INTO HORIZON] The woman becomes smaller and smaller. First human-sized. Then tiny. Then only a dark moving speck above the highway vanishing point. The camera desperately tracks her. Slight rolling shutter. Autofocus pumping. She finally disappears into the bright gray horizon haze. Her short distant Doppler scream fades away. 29–30s: [PAYOFF — EMPTY HORIZON] The camera holds on the exact spot where she vanished. Nothing there now. Only an empty highway horizon. Foreground remains chaotic: towering white-yellow foam between the trucks, sparkling lemonade still blasting from the tanker, baking-soda doors open, wet windshield, yellow liquid and white foam covering the highway. Final tiny digital pinch-zoom into the completely empty vanishing point. Hold. The roaring fizz continues. CUT / LOOP. [STYLE & QUALITY BOOSTERS] Photoreal handheld smartphone footage from inside a real car. Vertical 3:4. Continuous uninterrupted single take. Approaching movement first, then braking and stopping. No cinematic camera movement. No drone shot. No third-person cutaway. No external camera. Digital pinch-zooms only. Authentic consumer-phone autofocus and exposure behavior. Windshield remains part of the visual language throughout. One adult woman only. Woman enters from the RIGHT already on foot. She never exits a vehicle. Consistent face, body, hair and clothing throughout. Naturally voluptuous adult proportions. Secure opaque white spaghetti-strap tank top. Denim shorts. No nudity. Empty transparent jug visibly fills on camera for multiple seconds. Sparkling lemonade must remain pale yellow and visibly carbonated. Baking soda must remain white powder. Reaction begins where the powder physically contacts the lemonade. Reaction progresses visibly: small bubbles → rapid fizz → spreading foam → swelling foam → giant white-yellow geyser. No flame. No fireball. No black smoke. No electrical explosion. Exaggerated slapstick launch physics presented with photoreal visual rendering. The woman is launched toward the highway VANISHING POINT and visibly shrinks until she completely disappears. Identity lock to [ref_image] for: both trucks, truck positions, lemonade tanker graphics, ragged tank hole, lemonade stream, highway geometry, weather, windshield framing, A-pillar, dashboard foreground.

underwood

176,967 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Just in $AMD Anush "Speed is the moat"|ROCm🎙️ In the race to define the future of AI, what's the one advantage that truly lasts? It's not proprietary tech, argues Anush Elangovan Elangovan, VP of AI Software at AMD , but the sustainable speed of innovation. He explains why AMD is rejecting the "walled garden" model for its open source ROCm stack, betting that an open community flywheel is the key to victory. Listen to understand how this open strategy is designed to out-innovate closed systems by empowering developers to solve everything from frontier-model challenges to the mundane, everyday problems that define the "last mile" of AI. AMD ROCm Software: Part 1 Transcript [00:00:00] Andrew Zigler: Joining me is Anush Elangovan, VP of AI software at AMD. And when people talk about AI compute, the conversation often stops at hardware specs, but it's more than just physical chips that win the game. It's also the software ecosystems supporting them. [00:00:18] Andrew Zigler: The prevailing strategy in the industry has been to build something like a walled garden. You know, something closed, proprietary locks, developers in. But AMD is betting on an entirely different play, open source acceleration, and with rock, their open source AI software stack. AMD is building not just hardware parity, but an innovation flywheel that's powered by the community with interoperability and the freedom to scale without all of that pesky lockin. [00:00:48] Andrew Zigler: And in this world, speed is your moat and how fast you can innovate while your platform remains open, flexible, and standardize across all of its applications. That's what we're gonna explore [00:01:00] today. So Anush, I'm really excited to have you here. Welcome to Dev Interrupted. [00:01:04] Anush Elangovan: Thanks for having me. Uh, super excited to chat about it. [00:01:07] Andrew Zigler: Amazing. Well, let's go ahead and dive right in with kind of what I laid it out with in the beginning, the idea of the moat and it being about speed. I wanna unpack that a bit because that came from you when you and I first spoke. And I, and I want to know, you know, how do you define speed inside of AMD beyond just things like hardware, benchmarks. [00:01:27] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, that's a very good question. So when we typically talk about speed, everyone's like, Hey, hardware benchmark specs, right? Like, uh, memory bandwidth or, or flops. And that is one important part of it, uh, AMD does very well. With that, we do have, a, a very good history of executing on that axis. [00:01:47] Anush Elangovan: But when I say speed is the moat, it is about, uh, how we prepare, how we build the muscle to run the race for a long time and run it fast. And it is [00:02:00] not about a single point in time that you've, you've beat some you know, benchmark and, and you declare victory. It's about building the ability to consistently develop and deliver. [00:02:13] Anush Elangovan: Both hardware and software innovation at scale and do it fast, right? Like, you know, we we're increasingly getting to a point where models come out and they're, uh, you know, a year or two ago it was like, Hey, they work on AMD on day zero, which is great, but now they are performing on AMD the day it releases, right? [00:02:32] Anush Elangovan: So, what does it take to Prefetch where the industry is going? Be prepared to intercept. At that point is what you know, I, I refer to as you know, the, the speed factor in, in creating this mode, right? And the mode is just shed all things that hold you back and run as fast as you can. [00:02:53] Anush Elangovan: Uh, because the pace of innovation that is, uh, being seen in, in AI [00:03:00] industries is just. Amazing. Right? And it's like, it's transformational at at how you generate electricity. It's transformational as at how you build data centers. It's transformational at how you deploy compute, networking. It's transformational at what kind of use cases you, you know, uh, use AI for. [00:03:17] Anush Elangovan: Uh, and for that, you need to be prepared to, see what comes tomorrow and be prepared to run the race tomorrow. [00:03:23] Andrew Zigler: Yeah, it's a really great perspective because it highlights that it's not just like a checkpoint that you run through. I like how you called out, like it's not just hitting that benchmark or being the best in class at that moment, in that snapshot, it's about having a. The throughput and about having that dedication to the idea and continuing to deliver on it. [00:03:43] Andrew Zigler: It's not just crossing the threshold, but it's also being the engine. And that's what, that's what protects a business. That is the moat, because the moat is that innovation layer, the faster and more, uh, future forward. That you can work and think, [00:04:00] you know, the better. Uh, we, we talk a lot about like future forward work styles. [00:04:04] Andrew Zigler: Like what are the things I could be doing right now today that are gonna be like, way more useful tomorrow? Let, let's abandon those, workflows that are older and that kind of like, that translates into. An advantage when you work that way. You know, what kind of things have you learned working with, uh, like across all spectrums of people who would use ROCm, right? [00:04:23] Andrew Zigler: You have like the developers, but then you also have the enterprises and you have this large span of adoptees, right? So what is the, what does that look like that you learn? [00:04:32] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, so, so the way I look at it is there are gonna be pockets of different, uh, you know, cadences, right? Like, so people who are deploying in enterprises, for example, right? The validation and how long it takes for them to deploy an LLM that's secure. It's, with guardrails, et cetera, maybe longer. [00:04:52] Anush Elangovan: but you still have to go through the process and you have to be prepared to like, walk that walk to deploy an enterprises. That doesn't mean it's [00:05:00] not fast, that's as fast as you can do for that industry, right? And if you are deploying AI in healthcare, right, it's, it's got its own, uh, cycle. [00:05:07] Anush Elangovan: but in each one of these, you want to see how, like, go down to the essence of what is it that you actually have to do. And, you know, I, I, I like how you framed it. It's like it's, you shed your prior assumptions of how things are done, right. And, and you kind of build up from a, uh, first principles, uh, approach to say, this is how I could use AI to unlock, whatever I'm doing. [00:05:33] Anush Elangovan: And, and, some of it, you know, it's good to really step back and look at. Just question every part of it, right? Like right now you're getting chat GPT and, Gemini competing for like, math, olympiads and, and, uh, college, uh, reasoning, uh, tests. Right? And, and those are like that, that is amazing and increasingly like complex tasks that they're trying to do. [00:05:58] Anush Elangovan: But there may also be like. [00:06:00] More mundane things that AI could, could get applied to. Right? And, and so when we think about shedding old ways, you wanna shed it not just in like the tip of the spear. It's like, you know, I'm gonna see what's the frontier model. It's also, it could be something as simple as. [00:06:18] Anush Elangovan: How do you choose a, a movie, uh, you know, like a recommendation system, right? Or, or, uh, an automated, uh, flight, uh, rebooking system. So the moment, you know, your flight is late, uh, right now it's a notification, right? It's like, oh, you got a text message saying your flight's late. And I got that like three times this week. [00:06:38] Anush Elangovan: But anyway, uh, and, and, and, and, I was just like, okay, so if I were to rethink this. All this MCPs that we have that should be hooked up into an MCP that says, your flight's delayed. Here are your options. If you want, you know, these are the paid options. Yeah. Here are the free options. This will get you back into your you know, Toronto airport [00:07:00] tonight. [00:07:00] Anush Elangovan: Or if you stay, here's a hotel plus this, plus this, plus. It's just like, go ahead is all I should say. Versus now I'm like, okay, can someone, you know, can I call a travel agent? Can I do this? Can I go online and log into And you know, so we gotta fundamentally rethink even those like small, nuances of, things that we do that can be automated out and AI is really, really good at doing something like this, right? Maybe I just explained an AI startup idea right now. Somebody should just start that. [00:07:29] Andrew Zigler: I think you did. Yeah, you definitely did. Someone, one of our listeners is definitely going to lift that off of you. I, I, I, you know, I hate being on the receiving end of those. You feel a little helpless and then you have to like, follow the whole flow. So I know what you mean. Like I, I like how you called out that the build and this like. [00:07:45] Andrew Zigler: Where speed is your moat and the innovation layer is protecting you, is what makes you better than your competitors. How you scale that and you bring that to market. So by understanding the problems that you're solving, uh, throwing away those older assumptions, but also [00:08:00] recognizing that like. We're building every single day, new things and new ways of using stuff that we're still figuring out the implications of. [00:08:08] Andrew Zigler: And so when you have a lot of velocity and you're introducing a lot of new ideas, and maybe you have that workflow now that automatically rebook your flight off of your late flight text message, and uh, I know I would certainly use it, but you know, what kind of philosophies guide the way that y'all think about building this ecosystem to manage that stability while letting folks. [00:08:29] Andrew Zigler: Play with the speed and the assumptions and the airplane re bookings. [00:08:34] Anush Elangovan: so, so I think, you know, we need to peel one layer down, right? and the philosophy is, Hey, we, we just discovered electricity, right? And you know what we're gonna do? We are gonna make motors, uh, or dynamos, right? Like engines. Uh, sure. We don't know if it's gonna be a Ferrari that you're gonna make, or it's a a a a dump truck. [00:08:57] Anush Elangovan: That's good for doing this. But let's [00:09:00] let, which is also required, right? You need a dump truck. You need a garbage truck. And, [00:09:04] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. You need the [00:09:04] Anush Elangovan: course you need, uh, a Ferrari for a midlife crisis, right? So, [00:09:09] Andrew Zigler: precisely. [00:09:10] Anush Elangovan: But, but my, uh, point is what do we build next? And, uh, and this is what I meant by like, okay, let's, let's take those baby steps to build the. [00:09:20] Anush Elangovan: Infrastructure that's required that we know we'll have to use, right? So, so if I just discovered electricity, okay, great. Now one, how do I save this electricity and how do I use it? So there's battery technology, so you need to do something like that, right? Like so. But then you also want to make it into an actionable thing. [00:09:37] Anush Elangovan: You want to make it for like automobiles, or you wanna use it for, you know, powering, uh, entire cities. So it is that transformational. So, uh, AI is that transformational. So, if you distill down, it'll, it'll come down to how do we think about, what we can do with this this fundamental technology that, We may not be aware of what it [00:10:00] is gonna unlock next, but at least you know the next step is clear, right? It's like a dense fog, you know, it's gonna be like, it, it's the right path. You see the light, but it's kind of like out there and, and the steps you're taking are concrete and you're like, okay, this is good. [00:10:16] Anush Elangovan: I, this is better than where I was or where we were. So we are moving forward. So you can build with the. Intuition from what you see in the short term and a tactical view, but towards what you think the future is gonna be. [00:10:28] Andrew Zigler: Right. You almost like we're all in this like fog of war, right? And like you said, you're reaching out and you're trying to step through it. You could think of it too, as like you're in the dark and your hands are up in front of you and you know that. You're, you're not gonna run your face into a wall because your hands are out in front of you, but you're not gonna maybe do much better than that. [00:10:45] Andrew Zigler: So that's kind of like, I think the eco, the, the industry, the world that we find ourselves in, uh, and we all have to, then this becomes the power of an ecosystem, of a group of people working together to create that layer of, [00:11:00] uh, of establishing the [00:11:01] Anush Elangovan: exactly. And I, I, I just, instead of, you know, saying fog of war I describe it as like, you're in this. Beautiful valley with like a morning, uh, fog that's in. You can smell the flowers. You, you hear the birds. You are like, okay, it's, we are in like, uh, utopian paradise and yes, I just need to like, continue the walk, right? [00:11:24] Anush Elangovan: and then move forward with that, conviction that you're in the right spot. [00:11:27] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. So let's talk about that ecosystem world. This nice, I love how you describe it, this grassy side of a hill in the morning that's covered in some mist and maybe we can't see 30 feet in one direction, but it sure is a beautiful hill and it smells nice. And so we're all here. And why is, in that world, why is. [00:11:44] Andrew Zigler: You know, open source, their strategic advantage that y'all are going for in the AI hardware market. And, and then how does like ROCm turn that into wins for people within that ecosystem? [00:11:56] Anush Elangovan: you know, the, the way we look at it is this, is kind of like how I view [00:12:00] AI and the ecosystem, right? But, but it is for everyone to enjoy. Uh, and so we do want to make sure that. You know, it is, uh, beneficial for everyone. [00:12:09] Anush Elangovan: The ecosystem can come in and, and innovate. It's an open innovation engine. and uh, it is very different from, you know, having a walled garden with, Hey, only I know how to do this and I'm gonna do it and throw it over the fence and you can use it or keep walking, right? So we'd like to be good citizens that way, but also. [00:12:30] Anush Elangovan: Uh, it is self-fulfilling in a way, right? Like it, the, the pace at which we innovate with open source is unmatched. Like, you know, our serving engines are like VLLM and, and sg l. Those things, uh, those frameworks are like super, super aggressive in terms of how fast they come out with features and how fast they can you know, get performant models out. [00:12:52] Anush Elangovan: And that compared with what, uh, you'd get from, you know, the likes of like T-R-T-L-L-M or something is always lagging, right? Because you [00:13:00] just can't keep up with you know, 200 commits a week just on one particular model to get that model really performant [00:13:06] Andrew Zigler: And, and, and in that world where, you know, everyone can enjoy the winds of this, what kind of customer stories or innovation stories have really stood out to you and excite you about building and creating this place for developers? [00:13:19] Anush Elangovan: Yeah. So I think the parts that are super exciting for me are when when we get to see a customer that is first skeptical. Then they start a little like, okay, fine, we'll give you a chance. Uh, we do a simple, uh, POC and then they're like, huh, this seems to work. Yeah, we told you it works. [00:13:42] Anush Elangovan: You don't have to change one line of code. Really? Yes, no need to change one line of code. Okay, let's try a production workload. So then they try it. Oh, you're more performant than the competition. Yes. We're more performant than, than the competition. So how much does it cost? And we're like, oh, it's your TCO is better with, uh, [00:14:00] AMD. [00:14:00] Anush Elangovan: So again, they're like, wow, okay, good. So now how do we deploy at scale? And then we go deploy it at scale. And when they give a thumbs up on that and they say, this is good, right? That's when you know, you, you see it go full circle from like, oh, we, we've never heard about AMD to like actually deploy to tens of thousands of GPUs In the order of a few months, right? It, it, it really is fascinating to see and very exciting and invigorating to [00:14:28] Andrew Zigler: Yeah. At like a great exposure to a lot of interesting problems. And, and then people using the infrastructure, the, the technology available to solve those problems. Really specific problems by the way, that's often why they're bringing their data and AI to it, uh, is because it is really specific and important for them. [00:14:45] Andrew Zigler: And there's a, a lot I think that other engineering orgs can learn and even emulate from AMD's success and, and having this open source ecosystem and it causing this acceleration within. You [00:15:00] know, uh, customers and enterprises that use and adopt the tools and, and, and that creates an advantage. And that goes back to why we're talking and like the real thesis of our conversation today. [00:15:10] Andrew Zigler: So how do you think engineering leaders that are listening to this and obviously tapping into this great success AMD has from an open source flywheel, how do you think other, other folks building in the same space can foster that open, first, that open source oriented culture in order to, you know, accelerate their innovation goals? [00:15:29] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, that's a very good question. So the startup that um, was acquired by AMD we, we built, I mean, we started off doing iot stuff and you know, smart ring and all that, right? But in the, the end of like, uh, and not the end, the last six years of the company was building ML compilers. [00:15:47] Anush Elangovan: And ml, ML compilers are like super, uh, complicated, sophisticated, advanced algorithms, dah, dah, dah. but it was all open source, right? So our VCs were like, wait, what do you mean your core [00:16:00] IP is open source? And um, the speed is the moat applied even then, right? It was just like, yes, if you have an idea that. [00:16:08] Anush Elangovan: Because someone saw this idea that you are, they're gonna be able to catch up, then you probably have the wrong idea anyway. But if they are, you know, you execute and they're gonna catch up, that you should assume they're gonna catch up. Right? So you gotta move forward. So keeping it open source is super important. [00:16:25] Anush Elangovan: But also to your question on like, you know, the learnings from an AMD standpoint, right? If there are, hard problems, I'd say dig in and work through it, right? Like there's no way but through it, right? That should be the simple mentality. And more, uh, frequently than not. you'll see that you'll just make it through in a, in, in good form. [00:16:52] Anush Elangovan: But if you doubt it and you're like, oh, I don't know if I should commit, if I'm, I, you know, what should just commit to do the right thing [00:17:00] every step, right? Every step, and just keep taking one step in front of the other. And in no time you'll see that you'll be running. Right. And, and yes, the first few steps will be like, yeah, everyone's complaining about your software quality. [00:17:15] Anush Elangovan: Everyone's complaining about this and that, and it doesn't work. And, and a few steps in, you know, you get, you get the hang of all the complaints that are coming in. You get the feedback loop. You're like, okay, what, what are you prioritizing again? One step in front of the other, right? You just keep knocking that out and then you get to a point where you're, it just becomes second nature, right? To do the, to do the right thing. And, and then yes, if someone gives you two options, you'll be like, fine. This is, uh, you know, there's always the resource trade off. There's always a human capital trade off, but what's the right thing to do? of course, I, I'm pragmatic about what we choose, but, but if the right thing for your long-term success is dig in, go first, principles, make it [00:18:00] happen. [00:18:00] Anush Elangovan: Well. Then just go for that. There's, there is no shortcut to [00:18:04] Andrew Zigler: acknowledging, you know, how it aligns with your mission, your core company goals, and what you're looking to achieve. And, and I, I love how you rightfully called out that in the open source world and you know, you have your technology that you've built, what you think is your moat upon, right? [00:18:22] Andrew Zigler: It's your code and, and to open source that, or to just make it where anyone could peer in is, you know. Scary in one regard, but two, it just kind of feels like you're handing away your throne room in some kind of sense, a very direct feeling sense. But the ultimately, you were really right to call out, and this is something I think about all the time, that the real power there is still the speed This the speed. [00:18:42] Andrew Zigler: That was the moat at the beginning of our conversation. It's the speed in combination with your. Very specific domain understanding of what you're building and what you're creating, and your new role as the steward of that world and how people plug into it, which [00:19:00] has frankly, a lot more influence and power than lording over a closed. [00:19:04] Andrew Zigler: You know, repository or an ecosystem, and like you said, like throwing things over the wall. Sure. There, there might be people always on the other side of that wall, but you're not gonna have a great connection with them. You're not gonna be able to really clearly understand them. I, I like your metaphor of the side of the field of the mountain a lot more. [00:19:23] Andrew Zigler: But, but in the, in this world, you know, where. That speed is, is the power and, and open source is just one way that you can harness that speed to get really far ahead and to innovate. , There's other parts of this equation that you can be experimenting with too, and I'd love to pick your brain about them as a software leader and, and, and one of them is about looking forward and kind of understanding that future that we're all building towards and beyond today's models and hardware. [00:19:48] Andrew Zigler: You know, what do you see as the next major bottleneck or opportunity in the AI compute space? As, as you know, enterprises and folks start to get a little more mature about what's available to [00:20:00] them. [00:20:00] Anush Elangovan: Yeah, I think, the bottleneck and opportunity is, uh, what I'd call, call walking the last mile of ai. Right. Uh, and like I I, I gave you an example, uh, previously, but, but it's similar to that. It's like there are cases where Humans have so many, uh, things to do in your day. You know, like the, if we sit down and actually had a customer focus like, okay, these customers lives, I'm gonna save four hours of this customer's life. And if you actually sit down and look at all of that, it'll be. Easily automatable, easily you know, uh, applicable, uh, for ai, right? [00:20:39] Anush Elangovan: Like, but then making it happen is gonna take a little bit, right? It's like maybe it's, uh, paying your utility bill, right? Or something like that, right? Or, or, your healthcare explanation of benefits. Uh, like, I'm sure you get an explanation of benefits, and I'm like, I, I don't even know what that thing is. [00:20:55] Anush Elangovan: It's just like EOB and like. [00:20:57] Andrew Zigler: it's a big, a big old PDF. Yeah, [00:21:00] exactly. [00:21:01] Anush Elangovan: Like, like, I'm like great straight to the, uh, shredder, right? And but that could be, you know, automated with the ai, right? It, it, it'd be like, Hey, the summary of this thing is you went and visited this day. Everything is okay. Everything is paid for, so don't worry, it's not a bill. [00:21:17] Anush Elangovan: That again, the same, uh, thing, but the sense of what that information overload is could be. Digested by ai, uh, accumulated over time and retrieved when you need it. Like, I don't, I actually don't even need to know this EOB right now, unless of course, whenever I need to know it, that maybe, you know, like for some benefits I need to figure out what do, what did I do over the past year and how do I apply it? Source:

Mike

15,248 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

‼️⚡️“There’s NOTHING Left!” 600,000 Ukrainians DEAD! ⚡️‼️⚡️“It’s OVER For Ukraine & Zelensky Will Be GONE Within 60 Days.” Col. Douglas MacGregor 📑So we are now in a different situation. We're looking at Ukraine. Russia, in the last two and a half years has built up an enormously powerful and successful force. This is battle hardened, well-equipped, well-led, well-trained, highly disciplined. The Ukrainian force has been annihilated. They've lost over 600,000 dead on the battlefield. There's nothing left. The place is falling apart. And most of the money you were talking about will never get there. It's simply sent through the washing machine over to defense and then to the defense industries, and then the donations flow back to the hill. So it doesn't, you know, it's not a question that we're sending 60 billion and putting it into Zelensky's hands now. Now Zelensky and his friends will profit, no doubt about it. Let's not kid ourselves. They'll get some of it. How much? Who knows? I mean, this is the most corrupt country in the world. This is a country that has missing children, probably at this point in the hundreds of thousands. Prostitution, out of control. I mean, you're talking about criminality on a scale that we in the west can't even begin to imagine. It's a tragedy. It's the worst of all possible outcomes. The Ukrainian nation has been destroyed. Why? Because it's mortgaged to our vanity. In the west, Russia must be taught a lesson. Russia must be destroyed. Putin must be removed. Really? Why? Well, because we've decided that we want to strip Russia of its resources. So we turned Ukraine into a battering ram designed to stab Russia in the heart. The Russians woke up, not completely, but at the last minute, and decided, well, we probably should intervene here and stop what's happening and signal just how serious this is, in our estimation. So they did, and they found out it's much worse than we thought. The force is much larger, much better trained. It has much more equipment. This is a far more serious problem. And as a result, they had to step back, establish a defense, build up their forces, and now they're moving, and they're going to finish the job. Finish the job means everything from Odessa up to Kharkov is back in Russian hands. And those areas are originally Russian anyway, as has been pointed out. Your question is, what happens to the rest of the country that is west of the Dnieper River, this rump, Ukraine, and I think it's going to become a giant demilitarized zone, a DMZ, similar to what we have between north and South Korea. There will be nothing there. There won't be any fighting forces of any kind. And the Ukrainians can live there. And they may have some form of administration, but they're not going to be permitted to ever again present a direct threat to Russia. You pointed to the CIA stations and laboratories inside Ukraine. The Russians have overrun those. They know what's there. They know what we've been trying to do. They know that we've been experimenting biologically with various weapons that could be used against them. This is insanity. And it was never necessary. No one in the United States supported that. No one in the United States was consulted. So what do they do? They lie. They create a narrative. Russia is a revanchist nation. Russia is the Soviet Union reborn. We must stop it and defend democracy. That's all crap. That's nothing to do with any of it. And of course, Kiev is not a democratic state. Zelensky is not a democratic leader. He makes Stalin look good. So he's going to go out of business. He's going to vanish here over the next 30 to 60 days. Whether he succumbs to whatever the Ukrainians decide to do with him on the ground, I don't know. I'm sure that his foreign mercenaries that are surrounding him, special ops types from the United States and Britain and other countries, will do everything they can to keep him alive. But at some point, even they may abandon him. But the narrative persists because the media is an arm of the government. This is very similar to what Noam Chomsky wrote about during Vietnam. Manufactured consent creates the illusion that this is something we all want. No, we didn't want it. We didn't ask anybody to open the borders. We did not ask for millions of people that we don't know and know nothing about to come into the United States. And what do we do with millions of people who can't find work? Especially if we go into the serious financial crisis that every sane person on the planet is predicting is coming. What else can we say? I wish I could paint a positive picture.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

312,727 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren