Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
MP Dr Nishikant Dubey explains Jan-Nalayak in 'precise' words. "Rahul Ghandy is such LoP that, if I were to use Hindi word, it would be very cheap word in Bihari terms. He's MAJOR FIGURE of Visheshra dance famous in Bihar" Ps: Visheshra dance means Vulgar लौंडा डांस😂😂 This comes... show more
30,455 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
![despite the weird question, jongseob’s answer on whether he would rather have a child with absolutely perfect qualities from birth or one born naturally as a ‘blank slate’ and just ‘normal’ is very well articulated 🙂↕️ 🐈⬛: ..if certain desirable characteristics were already universally agreed upon within society, there would likely be many objectively "perfect" people in the world. so in such a society, if i were to choose option b, and if my child who isn't born as exactly ‘perfect', were to enter said society, would that child think to themself, "am i a non-desirable being?" [..] i obviously wouldn't think in that way myself, but if one thought of it this way, then there could be a different answer to it. 🐈⬛: …but what i thought was, suppose if you were born as a truly exceptional person with all desirable genes and characteristics: truth be told, i don't think you'd have as many opportunities to learn new things. [..] when we put our time into studying and stuff, i think the sense of accomplishment gained from discovering, learning, understanding new things, and making them part of yourself is a very vital part of our lives in order to find such happiness as humans. so, if we don't have something like that, wouldn't there be something lacking in our lives, no matter how advantageous our genes might be? like, in terms of genetics, you might be perfect, but what i'm trying to say is that from a purely human perspective, looking at ethics and morality, i think that having some flaws is actually an essential part of being human. #종섭 #P1Harmony](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2039008038628008299/amplify_video_thumb/2039007832033599488/img/D2HNXGcPcxOoZAT4.jpg)
![Right to Recovery Treatment evidence sessions in Scottish Parliament with Third Sector With You and The Salvation Army. What wording should replace “addiction” in the Bill to ensure people can access treatment without requiring a formal diagnosis? @GraemeCall78170 instead of answering his reply focuses on systemic access issues and the limitations of the Bill’s scope. Dr Sandesh Gulhane reminds him that the bill has narrow scope due to it not being a government bill and has to ask again about the use of the word addiction. Director of Addictions of The Salvation Armysays, "I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing". (Yes, its like a scene from the Ministry of Funny Walks) only none of this is funny, but deadly serious. Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Just on the point of addiction being used as a diagnosis, we heard from the Royal College of Psychiatrists, it was clear that perhaps the word addiction is not the right word to be used, and I'm sure that Douglas Ross, who is he member in charge of the bill, would be looking into that. So if we were to amend this because we need to say that you have something, not necessarily a diagnosis, but what is it that we should be saying in, in your opinion, as a way to have the right to have a treatment. Is it simply you would like to receive treatment or what exactly would you suggest?" @GraemeCall78170 "I think it for us, it's always been about access, right, so treatment is there. We recognise as an organisation we have a full clinical offer in England, not in Scotland, so we understand the importance of clinical process processes and in certain circumstances diagnosis is absolutely critical because there are other things that are going on, underlying mental health, underlying physical problems, so we completely recognise that. But the reality of the system is that people can't get access to the system, it's not about treatment. So services like ours here, all we do is we try and find ways to navigate the system to try and get people to where they need to be. But a lot of people that we engage with don't need a medical intervention, they dont. They just some mutual aid, some support, they need some practical stuff around their housing. So I think it's the disappointing thing as I read the bill as it was presented, it did feel narrow to me. I can't deny that. And I think it didn't reflect the experiences that we have as organisation." Dr Sandesh Gulhane "Being a member's bill it does need to be very narrow. It's not a government bill. If it was a government bill, that that's fair enough that this really does need to have enough scope. But my question was, what wording would you use in instead of a diagnosis of addiction? What wording would you like to see for people who do want to access treatment?" Lee Ball [Director of Addictions, Salvation Army] "For me, I think it's the person's right to want treatment. I think to give it a word or a title, it’s a really difficult thing. I don't envy your job trying to come up with a word for this because there are so many words that have so many different meanings."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1923046258106568839/amplify_video_thumb/1923045470848389120/img/LwHT-PKj8KCk_q4K.jpg)