MSNOW is melting down again. Trump asks the Supreme Court to keep...

Uploaded: 2026-09-04T10:58:02.000Z
Duration: PT84.017S
Channel: Gunther Eagleman™

1:23

Parnas: Are you at all concerned about the USPS mail-in ballot rule they’re floating, where they may not send mail-in ballots to your state if you don’t comply with all of their directives, essentially by sending voter rolls and other information to the government? Fontes: I think the courts are going to put the kibosh on that. But also, a lot of people don’t know that the USPS has a universal service obligation. Once a piece of mail gets into their hands, they’re mandated by law to move it through their system and get it where it needs to go.

Acyn

32,165 views • 1 month ago

5:27

🇺🇸 HUGE MASSIVE WIN! - Remember the SAVE America Act? The bill to make sure only citizens vote that the Senate let die? Trump just went and did a big piece of it anyway! The Supreme Court cleared his mail-ballot order 6-3. Ballots go only to verified voters now, with barcodes on the envelopes and a citizenship check before they go out. An Obama judge in Boston tried to block the whole thing. The Court knocked her block right down! 23 Democrat-run states ran to court to stop it. Think about that. Whole states fighting to keep barcodes and verified voter lists off your ballot. And they lost. Couldn't get it through the Senate. So he did it with a pen, and the Court let it fly! Call it the SAVE America Act, travel size.

Bill Mitchell

162,192 views • 17 days ago

1:04

🚨 UPDATE: Sen. Mike Lee just said President Trump should invoke certiorari before judgment at the SUPREME COURT to RAPIDLY push a SCOTUS ruling on an activist judge's block against executive order-imposed Postal Service mail-in ballot integrity rules The USPS' mail-in rules will ensure a LIST is turned over if states want a ballot sent, and ballots require barcode tracking! "If necessary, seek 'certiorari before judgment' to get this case in front of SCOTUS immediately." 💯 This case is at SCOTUS, but the ruling might take too long to even matter for the midterms. They're running out the clock. This is MASSIVE for November. SCOTUS must act and SECURE OUR ELECTIONS 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

160,821 views • 18 days ago

0:43

🚨 MAJOR BREAKING: The US Supreme Court has sided with President Trump, LIFTING a lower court’s order that blocked President Trump’s mail-in ballot restrictions to go into effect Trump’s order requires: - Each USPS envelope to have a unique barcode with tracking - DHS & SSA create approved voter list - USPS ONLY sends ballots to that list Trump is now allowed to move forward with this while the full case is heard.

Nick Sortor

812,057 views • 17 days ago

1:43

Newsom is already threatening to sue again, calling Trump’s mail-in voting safeguards “Orwellian.” Pritzker is calling it an “unprecedented attempt to interfere in our elections.” They’re not upset that the Court let the order move forward. They’re upset that basic eligibility checks might actually get enforced. The same people who spent years screaming about “protecting democracy” are now losing their minds over verifying who gets a ballot. Priorities.

Gunther Eagleman™

62,863 views • 16 days ago

0:23

🚨 A MAJOR Mail In Ballot WIN: In case you missed it Supreme Court just sided with President Trump: Trumps Mail in Ballot Restrictions will go into effect - USPS ONLY sends ballots to that list - DHS & SSA create approved voter list - USPS envelopes have a unique tracking barcode The full case will still be heard but in the mean time Trump CAN move forward

MAGA Voice

87,869 views • 17 days ago

2:53

SCOTUS just cleared the way for Trump’s mail-in ballot security rules. Here’s the plan: • DHS builds state citizenship lists • States must hand the Postal Service their mail-ballot voter lists • No list = no ballots delivered Right now 8 states + D.C. run fully by mail. Another 29 let anyone request a ballot with zero excuse. That’s 37 states + D.C. handing out unrestricted mail ballots. 30% of the 2024 vote came by mail — still triple what it was in 2004. Midterms are 70 days out. Early voting starts even sooner. The clock is ticking. And Justice Thomas? He just reminded everyone why the race police hate him: “There are only two things I have to do: stay Black and die.” They keep trying to tell him how a Black man is supposed to think. He keeps declining the invitation. One justice who refuses the script. One president fighting for election integrity. One country that still has a chance to get this right.

Gunther Eagleman™

55,487 views • 15 days ago

0:43

🚨🚨 HISTORIC SUPREME COURT EARTHQUAKE!!! 🚨🚨 The US Supreme Court just CRUSHED the lower court and SIDED WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP — lifting the block on his ironclad mail-in ballot restrictions RIGHT NOW! This is MASSIVE. Trump’s order is UNLEASHED and can finally take effect while the full case plays out: 🔥 Every single USPS ballot envelope MUST carry a unique barcode with full tracking 🔥 DHS & SSA will create a locked, verified voter list 🔥 USPS is FORBIDDEN from sending ballots to anyone not on that list The walls are closing in on ballot chaos. The system just got a steel lockdown. This is the biggest election integrity win in years — and it’s only the beginning. The left is about to melt down. Who’s ready for secure elections? Drop a 🔥 if you’re celebrating this victory!

CONSTITUTION X 🇺🇸

13,723 views • 17 days ago

1:39

TRUMP IS TRYING TO RIG THE MIDTERMS IN PLAIN SIGHT. A USPS whistleblower says his administration secretly rushed an untested system that could block millions of mail ballots, even after a judge ordered the work halted. The Constitution gives election authority to states and Congress, not the president. This is not “election integrity.” It is voter suppression by executive decree.

Joe Walsh

16,599 views • 9 days ago

0:39

🚨 BREAKING — FRAUD STATES JUST SUED: President Trump has formally been sued AGAIN by New York, California and nearly TWO DOZEN other states to subvert the U.S. Supreme Court and strike down his mail-in ballot restrictions The suit is filed in a blue jurisdiction This is LAW FARE to protect voter fraud! Their goal is to get another injunction to make sure USPS can’t require voter lists to send mail-in ballots. They want fraud. THROW THE SUIT OUT!

Eric Daugherty

119,491 views • 15 days ago

2:37

CNN is acting like asking for a clean mail-in ballot system is some kind of national emergency. The Trump administration is back at the Supreme Court trying to let new Postal Service rules take effect before the midterms, including barcodes on envelopes, real tracking, and a portal for mail voter lists. CNN’s Betsy Klein wraps the whole thing in the usual lecture about “unsubstantiated claims,” as if wanting a clear chain of custody is an attack on democracy itself. Nearly 50 million Americans voted by mail in 2024, and that is exactly why the process should be airtight instead of foggy. If your election argument falls apart the second somebody asks for receipts, you are not defending voting rights. You are defending the fog.

Gunther Eagleman™

61,426 views • 3 days ago

0:34

President Trump's executive order on mail-in ballots is very simple: If states want to use the postal service in their elections, they need a bar code on the envelop, a postmark by election day, and to ensure the ballot was completed by a qualified registered voter.

Theo Wold

49,815 views • 5 months ago

2:20

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of allowing the implementation of President Trump's order targeting mail-in voting ahead of the midterms. The new mail-in ballot procedure: 1. States provide a list of the ballots they intend to mail out. 2. USPS assigns a unique barcode to each. 3. When the ballot is mailed out, the barcode is scanned to ensure uniqueness and that it matches. • If there is no match or it’s a duplicate, it is not delivered. 4. When the voter mails the ballot back, the USPS scans it again and checks to make sure it matches what went out and isn’t a duplicate. • Any ballots that don’t match won’t be delivered. 5. The barcode check is completely done on the exterior envelope. • The USPS isn’t determining eligibility or deciding who gets a ballot. • They can’t see the actual votes. • They are essentially just ensuring there are no duplicates, that the number mailed in isn’t greater than the number mailed out, and that the person mailing one in was the same person who received them. This process is a total common sense solution since states are continuing to insist on mail-in ballots. Of course, the Democrats and Socialists are rejecting this. They fought it hard and that is why SCOTUS had to rule on it!

C-Reason🇺🇸

10,980 views • 15 days ago

0:52

The Clark County Election Department is introducing a new step in the in-person voting process in 2026. The check-in process and voting machines (now called ballot marking devices) will remain the same as in recent elections. But now, once a voter makes their selections, they get a printout of their ballot to review before submitting it through the new tabulators. This change aligns with statewide security standards and national best practices. By producing a paper ballot, every voter can easily review their selections before casting their vote. Paper records are then safely stored for audits and recounts if needed.

Clark County Nevada

18,982 views • 8 months ago

2:24

🚨 NEW USPS BALLOT VERIFICATION PLAN COULD SHAKE UP MAIL-IN VOTING A new election security measure highlighted by Minnesota Lt. Gov. candidate @PhilipCParrish would require states to provide the U.S. Postal Service with voter lists, allowing USPS to verify that mailed ballots match the official records. The plan also includes trackable barcodes and ballot markings designed to improve election oversight. Parrish says the proposal could help expose what he described as ballot harvesting through identity theft, alleging that multiple ballots can be sent to a single address using the names of registered voters. "People haven't been talking about this enough... the Post Office should be able to get some of that under control."

LindellTV

12,765 views • 1 month ago

8:55

A Federal Judge Just Delivered Trump a MAJOR Win Against Universal Mail-In Ballots A D.C. Circuit Court is allowing USPS to allow serial number barcoded voting lists before ballots are mailed to the masses. This is a BIG win election integrity. No more mass Mail-In Ballots which allows for illegal ballot harvesting. Now the Senate needs to pass the SAVE America Act.

Benny Johnson

365,535 views • 1 month ago

0:41

Every American deserves to know their vote counts and their vote is protected. We cannot keep running elections through a system that has been compromised for who knows how long. Voter ID, paper ballots, no machines, no mail-in ballots. These are not radical ideas. They are common sense. Most of the world does it this way. The primaries are already underway and if we do not have safe and secure elections in place before the general elections, nothing changes. It is that simple. Secretary Markwayne Mullin Donald J. Trump

General Mike Flynn

67,212 views • 5 months ago

3:16

Postmaster General David Steiner told a Senate committee Wednesday that, if a proposed rule is adopted, the U.S. Postal Service would withhold mail ballots from states that do not hand over to the federal government lists of people who have requested absentee or mail ballots. Sen. Gary Peters, the top Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security Committee, asked Steiner if the Postal Service would deliver ballots to a state's voters if that state refuses to turn over its absentee voter roll. "Under our proposed regulation? No," Steiner said, adding that the Postal Service would "tell the state that we need the manifest." The proposed USPS rule will ask states to provide the agency with a list of people who have requested a mail-in or absentee ballot for an election. "This provision will help determine adherence to federal law and facilitate law enforcement efforts," the proposed rule states. The proposal cites President Donald Trump's March executive order that seeks to tighten mail voting rules and create eligible voter lists, even though the Constitution explicitly grants states the authority to run elections, while Congress has a limited oversight role in adopting election regulations. Despite the president's own use of mail ballots in past elections, he has called the voting method "cheating."

PBS News

13,856 views • 2 months ago

0:42

MAKE YOUR PLAN TO VOTE NOW. SCOTUS just allowed the Trump administration to move forward, for now, with major new restrictions on mail voting ahead of the midterms. The order would require states to provide voter lists to the federal government and could restrict USPS from delivering mail ballots to voters who aren’t on those lists. The Court did not rule on whether Trump’s order is ultimately constitutional, and separate litigation is still pending. Yes, there will be more lawsuits. Yes, parts of this could still be blocked. But I haven’t seen anything that gives me confidence we should sit around and hope the courts save us.

Christopher Webb

13,629 views • 17 days ago

0:45

🚨 JUST IN: US Appeals Court has just BLOCKED President Trump from implementing USPS mail-in ballot security rules and voter list for the midterms HURRY UP, SCOTUS! The SUPREME COURT still has this case, and could issue a ruling soon Absolutely huge for the midterms. It's also why we need the SAVE AMERICA ACT so we don't need this to be done by EO in future elections 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

105,052 views • 14 hours ago

Live Cam

Video Failed to Load

Gunther Eagleman™

Anya Rossi• Live Now

0 Comments

Related Videos

President Trump's executive order on mail-in ballots is very simple: If states want to use the postal service in their elections, they need a bar code on the envelop, a postmark by election day, and to ensure the ballot was completed by a qualified registered voter.