Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

“Muscles are torn down and built back bigger” That’s legitimately NOT how muscle growth works…like AT ALL See Video attached for how muscle growth ACTUALLY works 4 slides 4 seconds per slide 16 seconds total S/O John Jewett

Dean Turner

115,475 subscribers

50,410 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The bros will tell you to lower every weight over five slow, meaningful seconds. Big mistake. You are a third to a half stronger lowering a weight than lifting it. That is just how the body works. So if you can press the thing up at all, you own it on the way down. Easily. However slowly you lower it, you are babysitting a load the muscle already handles with room to spare. You cannot challenge a fibre that finds the weight comfortable. Take ten seconds if you like. It stays completely unbothered. And it gets worse, because the slow negative does not just fail to grow you, it actively costs you. Every long descent drains your energy, so you reach the concentric, the part that actually builds muscle, with fewer good reps left in you. You have spent yourself on the phase that stimulates nothing. Slow eccentrics are not a weak hypertrophy technique. They are hypertrophy in reverse. Lower it under control in two seconds. Then drive hard, where the muscle is weakest and the growth actually happens. The weight was never listening on the way down.

The bros will tell you to lower every weight over five slow, meaningful seconds. Big mistake. You are a third to a half stronger lowering a weight than lifting it. That is just how the body works. So if you can press the thing up at all, you own it on the way down. Easily. However slowly you lower it, you are babysitting a load the muscle already handles with room to spare. You cannot challenge a fibre that finds the weight comfortable. Take ten seconds if you like. It stays completely unbothered. And it gets worse, because the slow negative does not just fail to grow you, it actively costs you. Every long descent drains your energy, so you reach the concentric, the part that actually builds muscle, with fewer good reps left in you. You have spent yourself on the phase that stimulates nothing. Slow eccentrics are not a weak hypertrophy technique. They are hypertrophy in reverse. Lower it under control in two seconds. Then drive hard, where the muscle is weakest and the growth actually happens. The weight was never listening on the way down.

Sama Hoole

48,342 görüntüleme • 29 gün önce

Muscles are not torn down and built back bigger.⠀ ⠀ If they were, every car crash victim would leave hospital looking like Ronnie Coleman.⠀ ⠀ Muscle damage is a byproduct of training, not a mechanism. The driver of growth is mechanical tension on muscle fibres at high motor unit recruitment. Damage happens to occur alongside it. The two are correlated, not causal.⠀ ⠀ Soreness is even less useful. Soreness is mostly the muscle reporting that you did something it was not yet adapted to. A trained muscle stops getting sore from its regular work, and continues to grow. The training did not stop working. The novelty stopped existing.⠀ ⠀ Chasing soreness actively delays hypertrophy. It taxes recovery. It pushes back the next session because the tissue is still busy repairing structural damage instead of laying down new contractile protein. You spend days walking like you have aged forty years, and the only thing growing is your sense of grievance with the stairs.⠀ ⠀ Train hard enough to drive tension. Stop short of demolition. Recover. Repeat in 72 hours.⠀ ⠀ The fact this is news to most lifters tells you everything about who is writing the programmes.

Muscles are not torn down and built back bigger.⠀ ⠀ If they were, every car crash victim would leave hospital looking like Ronnie Coleman.⠀ ⠀ Muscle damage is a byproduct of training, not a mechanism. The driver of growth is mechanical tension on muscle fibres at high motor unit recruitment. Damage happens to occur alongside it. The two are correlated, not causal.⠀ ⠀ Soreness is even less useful. Soreness is mostly the muscle reporting that you did something it was not yet adapted to. A trained muscle stops getting sore from its regular work, and continues to grow. The training did not stop working. The novelty stopped existing.⠀ ⠀ Chasing soreness actively delays hypertrophy. It taxes recovery. It pushes back the next session because the tissue is still busy repairing structural damage instead of laying down new contractile protein. You spend days walking like you have aged forty years, and the only thing growing is your sense of grievance with the stairs.⠀ ⠀ Train hard enough to drive tension. Stop short of demolition. Recover. Repeat in 72 hours.⠀ ⠀ The fact this is news to most lifters tells you everything about who is writing the programmes.

Sama Hoole

30,088 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Time under tension is a red herring. If TUT mattered, planks would build massive abs. They don't. Because there's no progressive overload of mechanical tension. The plank gets longer. The abs don't. A 5-rep set takes around 15 seconds. A 15-rep set takes around 45 seconds. Both can produce the same hypertrophy if both are taken close enough to failure. The growth doesn't come from the duration. It comes from the mechanical tension in the hard reps. The ones at the end of the set where the bar is barely moving and the muscle is recruiting every available fibre to finish the rep. You can hold a light weight for 60 seconds and get nothing. You can lift a heavy weight for 15 seconds and grow. Time doesn't build muscle. Tension does. Stop counting seconds. Start counting how close you got to failure.

Time under tension is a red herring. If TUT mattered, planks would build massive abs. They don't. Because there's no progressive overload of mechanical tension. The plank gets longer. The abs don't. A 5-rep set takes around 15 seconds. A 15-rep set takes around 45 seconds. Both can produce the same hypertrophy if both are taken close enough to failure. The growth doesn't come from the duration. It comes from the mechanical tension in the hard reps. The ones at the end of the set where the bar is barely moving and the muscle is recruiting every available fibre to finish the rep. You can hold a light weight for 60 seconds and get nothing. You can lift a heavy weight for 15 seconds and grow. Time doesn't build muscle. Tension does. Stop counting seconds. Start counting how close you got to failure.

Sama Hoole

21,435 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

No time for long workouts? Here’s how to build muscle FAST in just 3–4 sessions a week 1️⃣ Go hard, not long . 40 minutes of focused lifting beats 2 hours of lazy reps 2️⃣ Prioritize compound lifts (squats, deadlifts, rows, presses) 3️⃣ Shorten your rest (45–60 sec) to boost growth and testosterone 4️⃣ Use smart intensity: supersets, drop sets, rest-pause 5️⃣ Eat before & after training (carbs + protein = power + recovery) 6️⃣ Recover like a pro: dial in your sleep, hydration, mobility, and stress Muscle isn’t built by doing more. It’s built by doing it right. Save time. Train smart. Grow fast.

No time for long workouts? Here’s how to build muscle FAST in just 3–4 sessions a week 1️⃣ Go hard, not long . 40 minutes of focused lifting beats 2 hours of lazy reps 2️⃣ Prioritize compound lifts (squats, deadlifts, rows, presses) 3️⃣ Shorten your rest (45–60 sec) to boost growth and testosterone 4️⃣ Use smart intensity: supersets, drop sets, rest-pause 5️⃣ Eat before & after training (carbs + protein = power + recovery) 6️⃣ Recover like a pro: dial in your sleep, hydration, mobility, and stress Muscle isn’t built by doing more. It’s built by doing it right. Save time. Train smart. Grow fast.

Sandy Biohacker

69,092 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Eby admits what we all know: he has no idea what he’s doing. He laughs, but it’s not funny. It’s a critical time for this sector in BC. and he’s outright telling the Association for Mineral Exploration he has “no idea”how mineral exploration works. Keep in mind, new mineral exploration claims are down 29% from the average of the past 7 years. The total mineral claim area applied for / registered is down 60% since B.C.’s new mineral claims consultation frameworktook effect. And the Premier laughs as he says “I have no idea how exploration works.” (Read more on this government’s flawed approach to mineral exploration here:

Eby admits what we all know: he has no idea what he’s doing. He laughs, but it’s not funny. It’s a critical time for this sector in BC. and he’s outright telling the Association for Mineral Exploration he has “no idea”how mineral exploration works. Keep in mind, new mineral exploration claims are down 29% from the average of the past 7 years. The total mineral claim area applied for / registered is down 60% since B.C.’s new mineral claims consultation frameworktook effect. And the Premier laughs as he says “I have no idea how exploration works.” (Read more on this government’s flawed approach to mineral exploration here:

Caroline Elliott

12,928 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

The Bro Split that every young lad gets sold on looks like this.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Chest⠀ Tuesday: Back⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Legs⠀ Friday: Shoulders⠀ Saturday: Arms⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ And yes, Arnold did it. Arnold also took enough drugs to sedate a medium-sized country, so perhaps not the most transferable template.⠀ ⠀ The problem is simple. Each muscle here gets hit once a week. Train hard enough and you'll trigger a window of muscle protein synthesis that runs for roughly 2-3 days. After that the window closes, and the muscle fibres begin to catabolise slowly. The back half of the week isn't neutral. It's quietly eroding the growth stimulus you picked up on Monday.⠀ ⠀ Once a week is not a holding pattern. It's a losing one.⠀ ⠀ The fix is training each muscle at least twice. An upper/lower split does this cleanly.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Upper⠀ Tuesday: Lower⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Upper⠀ Friday: Rest⠀ Saturday: Lower⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ Same days in the gym. Every muscle getting two shots at the growth window per week instead of one.⠀ ⠀ If there's a specific muscle you want to bring up faster, glutes being the obvious example, you can push that to three times a week with a full body approach, hitting the priority muscle first in every session when you're freshest.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Wednesday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Friday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ ⠀ More frequent stimulus. More growth windows captured. Less of the week spent sliding backwards.⠀ ⠀ The Bro Split isn't useless. It just isn't optimal. And if you're going to spend the time, you may as well spend it on something that actually works.⠀ ⠀ Minimum twice a week per muscle. Three if you're serious about a lagging group. The rest is just detail.

The Bro Split that every young lad gets sold on looks like this.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Chest⠀ Tuesday: Back⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Legs⠀ Friday: Shoulders⠀ Saturday: Arms⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ And yes, Arnold did it. Arnold also took enough drugs to sedate a medium-sized country, so perhaps not the most transferable template.⠀ ⠀ The problem is simple. Each muscle here gets hit once a week. Train hard enough and you'll trigger a window of muscle protein synthesis that runs for roughly 2-3 days. After that the window closes, and the muscle fibres begin to catabolise slowly. The back half of the week isn't neutral. It's quietly eroding the growth stimulus you picked up on Monday.⠀ ⠀ Once a week is not a holding pattern. It's a losing one.⠀ ⠀ The fix is training each muscle at least twice. An upper/lower split does this cleanly.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Upper⠀ Tuesday: Lower⠀ Wednesday: Rest⠀ Thursday: Upper⠀ Friday: Rest⠀ Saturday: Lower⠀ Sunday: Rest⠀ ⠀ Same days in the gym. Every muscle getting two shots at the growth window per week instead of one.⠀ ⠀ If there's a specific muscle you want to bring up faster, glutes being the obvious example, you can push that to three times a week with a full body approach, hitting the priority muscle first in every session when you're freshest.⠀ ⠀ Monday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Wednesday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ Friday: Full Body (glutes first)⠀ ⠀ More frequent stimulus. More growth windows captured. Less of the week spent sliding backwards.⠀ ⠀ The Bro Split isn't useless. It just isn't optimal. And if you're going to spend the time, you may as well spend it on something that actually works.⠀ ⠀ Minimum twice a week per muscle. Three if you're serious about a lagging group. The rest is just detail.

Sama Hoole

24,136 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Your metabolism isn’t broken. You’re just playing the wrong game. Post-chest day pump into a full Forbici feast: their largest pepperoni pizza, cacio e pepe, Caesar salad, double protein chicken bowl, and wine. This is what metabolic flexibility actually looks like. When you carry significant muscle mass at 12% body fat, your body becomes a completely different machine. You’re not just “lean”, you’re metabolically advantaged. Think of it like this: Fat cells are storage units. Muscle cells are furnaces. The more furnaces you have running 24/7, the more fuel you can throw at them without consequence. At 12% body fat with real muscle tissue, your insulin sensitivity is optimized. Nutrients partition preferentially into muscle, not fat. Your body actually PREFERS to burn fat for fuel at rest and shuttle carbs into muscle for growth and performance. This is why I can destroy an entire Italian feast on date night without anxiety or tomorrow’s cardio “punishment.” The muscle mass creates metabolic flexibility, the ability to efficiently use whatever fuel source you give it. Most people obsess over aggressive deficits and endless cardio, treating fat loss like an emergency. Yes, these tools work. Yes, you can preserve muscle if you’re smart about it. But you’re still playing defense, constantly fighting to maintain what little muscle you have while grinding through restriction. The game isn’t just getting lean. It’s building the engine that makes being lean effortless. When you prioritize muscle acquisition FIRST, you create a physique that burns more calories at rest, handles carbs better, and allows you to eat like someone who enjoys date night. Stop majoring in the minors. Build the metabolic advantage first, then reveal what you’ve built. Your grandmother was right - you need to eat. When you have the muscle mass to support it, food becomes fuel, not the enemy.

Your metabolism isn’t broken. You’re just playing the wrong game. Post-chest day pump into a full Forbici feast: their largest pepperoni pizza, cacio e pepe, Caesar salad, double protein chicken bowl, and wine. This is what metabolic flexibility actually looks like. When you carry significant muscle mass at 12% body fat, your body becomes a completely different machine. You’re not just “lean”, you’re metabolically advantaged. Think of it like this: Fat cells are storage units. Muscle cells are furnaces. The more furnaces you have running 24/7, the more fuel you can throw at them without consequence. At 12% body fat with real muscle tissue, your insulin sensitivity is optimized. Nutrients partition preferentially into muscle, not fat. Your body actually PREFERS to burn fat for fuel at rest and shuttle carbs into muscle for growth and performance. This is why I can destroy an entire Italian feast on date night without anxiety or tomorrow’s cardio “punishment.” The muscle mass creates metabolic flexibility, the ability to efficiently use whatever fuel source you give it. Most people obsess over aggressive deficits and endless cardio, treating fat loss like an emergency. Yes, these tools work. Yes, you can preserve muscle if you’re smart about it. But you’re still playing defense, constantly fighting to maintain what little muscle you have while grinding through restriction. The game isn’t just getting lean. It’s building the engine that makes being lean effortless. When you prioritize muscle acquisition FIRST, you create a physique that burns more calories at rest, handles carbs better, and allows you to eat like someone who enjoys date night. Stop majoring in the minors. Build the metabolic advantage first, then reveal what you’ve built. Your grandmother was right - you need to eat. When you have the muscle mass to support it, food becomes fuel, not the enemy.

Coach Paul

22,950 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

And for my next magic trick… I’ll teach you how to sculpt a thin waist and strong core in just one month; designed for even the laziest people. Do this for 1 minute, 3–5x per day. I know you’re busy, so I sped up the video in the hope that you’ll actually try it. You’re very smart; you’ll get the concept instantly. Video key: 🎈 = Inhale (full, deep belly breath) 🌬️ = Engage deep core muscles. Hold for 30 seconds while gently exhaling. Once fully exhaled, keep the engagement and continue breathing normally (do NOT hold your breath). The longer I hold, you can see the more muscles I recruit. Questions? Try it right now! (Unless you are ill or injured)

And for my next magic trick… I’ll teach you how to sculpt a thin waist and strong core in just one month; designed for even the laziest people. Do this for 1 minute, 3–5x per day. I know you’re busy, so I sped up the video in the hope that you’ll actually try it. You’re very smart; you’ll get the concept instantly. Video key: 🎈 = Inhale (full, deep belly breath) 🌬️ = Engage deep core muscles. Hold for 30 seconds while gently exhaling. Once fully exhaled, keep the engagement and continue breathing normally (do NOT hold your breath). The longer I hold, you can see the more muscles I recruit. Questions? Try it right now! (Unless you are ill or injured)

Jessica

42,718 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

From 25 Years of Data to 79% Winrate on Prediction Markets Indicators [38] - Moving averages: MA10, MA20, MA30 - RSI (overbought/oversold) - MACD / MACD_Signal (trend) - Bollinger Upper/Lower (volatility) - Volatility 10/20/30, OBV, momentum, sentiment, insider activity, etc Humans can't do that -> AI processes everything in seconds Here's how it works. The purpose of the model Not to predict the price It answers one question: “Will there be growth tomorrow?” Target1 = (close.shift(-1) > close).astype(int) # 1 → BUY, 0 → HOLD For the complete structure, you also need: - Neural network architecture - Monte Carlo Dropout (key point) - Trading logic Result: - Win rate 59–78% - 100+ trades per month → consistently profitable - The human brain is incapable of analyzing 38 indicators × 30 markets × 24/7 Therefore, this trader has already made $1.4 million in profit in 4 months You can find a full explanation of how this works at Noisy Original reading time: 15 min

From 25 Years of Data to 79% Winrate on Prediction Markets Indicators [38] - Moving averages: MA10, MA20, MA30 - RSI (overbought/oversold) - MACD / MACD_Signal (trend) - Bollinger Upper/Lower (volatility) - Volatility 10/20/30, OBV, momentum, sentiment, insider activity, etc Humans can't do that -> AI processes everything in seconds Here's how it works. The purpose of the model Not to predict the price It answers one question: “Will there be growth tomorrow?” Target1 = (close.shift(-1) > close).astype(int) # 1 → BUY, 0 → HOLD For the complete structure, you also need: - Neural network architecture - Monte Carlo Dropout (key point) - Trading logic Result: - Win rate 59–78% - 100+ trades per month → consistently profitable - The human brain is incapable of analyzing 38 indicators × 30 markets × 24/7 Therefore, this trader has already made $1.4 million in profit in 4 months You can find a full explanation of how this works at Noisy Original reading time: 15 min

Alex

95,335 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

How fast you can/should lose weight when cutting: - If you are > 20% body-fat, you should aim to lose 1-1.25% of your total bodyweight per week (less aggressive is fine too if that’s better for sustainability) - If you are 15-20% body-fat, you should aim to lose .75-1% of your total bodyweight per week (less aggressive is fine too if that’s better for sustainability) - If you are 10-15% body-fat, you should aim to lose .5-.75% of your total bodyweight per week - If you are < 10% body-fat, you should aim to lose .5% or < of your total bodyweight per week Note: These are the ideal theoretical figures but when the rubber actually meets the road…you may not be able to attain a .75, 1%, 1.25% rate of loss (if higher in body-fat) Should that be the case…DON’T freak out!!! If you’re losing .50, .55, .60, .65% of your total bodyweight per week and your approach feels sustainable…pat yourself on the back and KEEP GOING! The point of the ideal rates is to show you what you’ll PROBABLY be able to lose without risking muscle loss depending on where you’re sitting at as far as BF% goes

How fast you can/should lose weight when cutting: - If you are > 20% body-fat, you should aim to lose 1-1.25% of your total bodyweight per week (less aggressive is fine too if that’s better for sustainability) - If you are 15-20% body-fat, you should aim to lose .75-1% of your total bodyweight per week (less aggressive is fine too if that’s better for sustainability) - If you are 10-15% body-fat, you should aim to lose .5-.75% of your total bodyweight per week - If you are < 10% body-fat, you should aim to lose .5% or < of your total bodyweight per week Note: These are the ideal theoretical figures but when the rubber actually meets the road…you may not be able to attain a .75, 1%, 1.25% rate of loss (if higher in body-fat) Should that be the case…DON’T freak out!!! If you’re losing .50, .55, .60, .65% of your total bodyweight per week and your approach feels sustainable…pat yourself on the back and KEEP GOING! The point of the ideal rates is to show you what you’ll PROBABLY be able to lose without risking muscle loss depending on where you’re sitting at as far as BF% goes

Dean Turner

74,943 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Time under tension does not build muscle. You can move as slowly as you like. Control every millimetre. Turn a six-rep set into a 60-second ceremony. The muscle does not respond to the clock. It responds to mechanical tension applied close to failure by a load that is actually threatening it. No proximity to failure: no stimulus, regardless of how slowly you moved. And if you do push close to failure with a slow concentric, you have spent the whole set recruiting slow-twitch fibres, the ones built for endurance, while the fast-twitch fibres, the ones with genuine hypertrophic potential, wait at the side with nothing to do. They want heavy weight moved with maximum intent. They want the bar to slow because it is beating you, not because you chose to lose to it. Slow eccentrics compound this by generating damage without a proportional growth signal, because the muscle is at its strongest during the eccentric and nowhere near its limit. Feel free to move slowly. The fast-twitch fibres will remain exactly where they are.

Time under tension does not build muscle. You can move as slowly as you like. Control every millimetre. Turn a six-rep set into a 60-second ceremony. The muscle does not respond to the clock. It responds to mechanical tension applied close to failure by a load that is actually threatening it. No proximity to failure: no stimulus, regardless of how slowly you moved. And if you do push close to failure with a slow concentric, you have spent the whole set recruiting slow-twitch fibres, the ones built for endurance, while the fast-twitch fibres, the ones with genuine hypertrophic potential, wait at the side with nothing to do. They want heavy weight moved with maximum intent. They want the bar to slow because it is beating you, not because you chose to lose to it. Slow eccentrics compound this by generating damage without a proportional growth signal, because the muscle is at its strongest during the eccentric and nowhere near its limit. Feel free to move slowly. The fast-twitch fibres will remain exactly where they are.

Sama Hoole

44,777 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

When you train in the 10-12 rep range, most of your reps have no direct effect on growth. When you train in the 4-6 range, virtually all of your reps are growth reps. Both ranges can build muscle. The mechanism doesn't care about the rep count. It cares about how close you get to true failure on the reps where the high-threshold motor units are recruited and every available fibre is firing. Those are the stimulating reps. Everything else is filler. The catch with 10-12 is twofold. First, only the last 4-5 reps in a 12-rep set are actually stimulating. The first seven are buffer. They generate fatigue, lactic acid, and joint wear that the muscle has to push through before any growth signal arrives. Effort, yes. Stimulus, no. Second, and this is where the high-rep crowd quietly come undone: the long set produces so much afferent feedback (burning, gasping, the legs giving a small philosophical speech) that almost nobody actually takes the set to true failure. They stop two, three, sometimes four reps short, mistake the discomfort for the limit, and call it a hard set. The stimulating reps they were chasing never showed up. A set of 6 doesn't allow that confusion. Failure is mechanical. The weight either moves or it doesn't. No interpretive dance required. You'll grow on 10-12. You'll grow more on 4-6, with less joint wear, less recovery debt, and considerably less guesswork. One range tolerates your mistakes. The other doesn't have room for them.

When you train in the 10-12 rep range, most of your reps have no direct effect on growth. When you train in the 4-6 range, virtually all of your reps are growth reps. Both ranges can build muscle. The mechanism doesn't care about the rep count. It cares about how close you get to true failure on the reps where the high-threshold motor units are recruited and every available fibre is firing. Those are the stimulating reps. Everything else is filler. The catch with 10-12 is twofold. First, only the last 4-5 reps in a 12-rep set are actually stimulating. The first seven are buffer. They generate fatigue, lactic acid, and joint wear that the muscle has to push through before any growth signal arrives. Effort, yes. Stimulus, no. Second, and this is where the high-rep crowd quietly come undone: the long set produces so much afferent feedback (burning, gasping, the legs giving a small philosophical speech) that almost nobody actually takes the set to true failure. They stop two, three, sometimes four reps short, mistake the discomfort for the limit, and call it a hard set. The stimulating reps they were chasing never showed up. A set of 6 doesn't allow that confusion. Failure is mechanical. The weight either moves or it doesn't. No interpretive dance required. You'll grow on 10-12. You'll grow more on 4-6, with less joint wear, less recovery debt, and considerably less guesswork. One range tolerates your mistakes. The other doesn't have room for them.

Sama Hoole

62,986 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Here's that Conklin play at the end. You can see Saleh up top, standing 4 yards to our left from the ref. The end gets cut off, but you can see the ref start to run downfield toward the play and Saleh chasing behind him. I think the ref couldn't hear/see Saleh. Not great on the ref's part at all (he should be assuming Saleh wants to call it there and be more prepared for it: also how can you not hear him?) but why is Saleh not standing right next to the ref? Should be hovering over the man. Could've made this a whole lot easier To me this is a mix of both subpar officiating and a coaching mistake. Definitely not a great job by the ref, but also slightly on Saleh for making this harder by standing 4 yards away from the ref instead of right next to him. IMO But still, even at the very end of this clip there's ~17-16 seconds left. I find it very hard to believe Saleh didn't get the timeout in until 13 seconds. I say 80% bad officiating, 20% Saleh

Here's that Conklin play at the end. You can see Saleh up top, standing 4 yards to our left from the ref. The end gets cut off, but you can see the ref start to run downfield toward the play and Saleh chasing behind him. I think the ref couldn't hear/see Saleh. Not great on the ref's part at all (he should be assuming Saleh wants to call it there and be more prepared for it: also how can you not hear him?) but why is Saleh not standing right next to the ref? Should be hovering over the man. Could've made this a whole lot easier To me this is a mix of both subpar officiating and a coaching mistake. Definitely not a great job by the ref, but also slightly on Saleh for making this harder by standing 4 yards away from the ref instead of right next to him. IMO But still, even at the very end of this clip there's ~17-16 seconds left. I find it very hard to believe Saleh didn't get the timeout in until 13 seconds. I say 80% bad officiating, 20% Saleh

Michael Nania

208,375 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The thing I help hitters with the most.. (1 good way to train it👇🏼) They start on time but never actually get loaded to GO. They think they’re ready. They’re not. So they start earlier next time. Same problem. —— This is a conversation I have with almost every hitter. When is the right time for you? - Based on your load style - Based on how long your load takes - Based on the pitcher’s velo, windup, or slide step —— If that’s you, try a “loaded at release” type load. Bobby Witt. Judge. Get your hip and elbow loaded early. Then stride with it ready to fire. “The pitcher is up there for 20 seconds telling you to get ready. Shame on you if you’re not ready to swing.” ____ If I have you in the cage, what I’ll do is have you get into a no stride position, get ready to swing and I stand there for 1-4 seconds… Holding my hand out over the plate ready to snap my fingers. When I snap, you swing. Do that 4-5x. You get the quickness, readiness feeling. Then we go back to stride with moving ball and you’re trying to time up that same GO move with the ball With your foot up in the air and the GO will make the foot go down. Not foot down then swing. That typically kills quickness. This works 95% of the time I’d say! —— > Send this to a hitter who needs it > Save it for when you need it.

The thing I help hitters with the most.. (1 good way to train it👇🏼) They start on time but never actually get loaded to GO. They think they’re ready. They’re not. So they start earlier next time. Same problem. —— This is a conversation I have with almost every hitter. When is the right time for you? - Based on your load style - Based on how long your load takes - Based on the pitcher’s velo, windup, or slide step —— If that’s you, try a “loaded at release” type load. Bobby Witt. Judge. Get your hip and elbow loaded early. Then stride with it ready to fire. “The pitcher is up there for 20 seconds telling you to get ready. Shame on you if you’re not ready to swing.” ____ If I have you in the cage, what I’ll do is have you get into a no stride position, get ready to swing and I stand there for 1-4 seconds… Holding my hand out over the plate ready to snap my fingers. When I snap, you swing. Do that 4-5x. You get the quickness, readiness feeling. Then we go back to stride with moving ball and you’re trying to time up that same GO move with the ball With your foot up in the air and the GO will make the foot go down. Not foot down then swing. That typically kills quickness. This works 95% of the time I’d say! —— > Send this to a hitter who needs it > Save it for when you need it.

Trey Hannam

39,339 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

My girlfriend asked why I was smiling at 4 AM. Showed her the terminal. "What are all those green numbers?" +$11,400. Made while I slept. "Doing what?" Nothing. Claude scanned 86 million Polymarket trades, found the 47 wallets that never lose, and built me a bot that copies them live. She watched for 10 seconds: +$340 captured +$890 captured +$1,400 captured "It just keeps going?" Every few seconds. New market. New edge. New profit. "How much did you start with?" $25/month. Claude API + $5 VPS. Now the bot runs 24/7 in Germany and I haven’t touched it in 19 days. "What does it do?" Finds mispriced markets before the crowd, copies the smartest whales, exits at the perfect moment. 74% win rate. Sharpe 2.31. "That’s legal?" Polymarket is. The top wallets do this every day. I just have one screen. She looked at the P&L curve. Never dips. Just climbs. "Can you make me one?" Setting hers up now. She still doesn’t get how it works. The bot doesn’t care. You only need Claude + the 4 open-source repos + 1 hour this weekend. Giving the full step-by-step + my exact bot setup free for the next 24 hours. To get it: > Comment the word "BOT". > Like + Retweet this post. > Follow me slash1s (so I can DM you the link). > Bookmark this post.

My girlfriend asked why I was smiling at 4 AM. Showed her the terminal. "What are all those green numbers?" +$11,400. Made while I slept. "Doing what?" Nothing. Claude scanned 86 million Polymarket trades, found the 47 wallets that never lose, and built me a bot that copies them live. She watched for 10 seconds: +$340 captured +$890 captured +$1,400 captured "It just keeps going?" Every few seconds. New market. New edge. New profit. "How much did you start with?" $25/month. Claude API + $5 VPS. Now the bot runs 24/7 in Germany and I haven’t touched it in 19 days. "What does it do?" Finds mispriced markets before the crowd, copies the smartest whales, exits at the perfect moment. 74% win rate. Sharpe 2.31. "That’s legal?" Polymarket is. The top wallets do this every day. I just have one screen. She looked at the P&L curve. Never dips. Just climbs. "Can you make me one?" Setting hers up now. She still doesn’t get how it works. The bot doesn’t care. You only need Claude + the 4 open-source repos + 1 hour this weekend. Giving the full step-by-step + my exact bot setup free for the next 24 hours. To get it: > Comment the word "BOT". > Like + Retweet this post. > Follow me slash1s (so I can DM you the link). > Bookmark this post.

slash1s

85,017 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Elon Musk just described the one thing most founders in Silicon Valley have never actually done. Musk: “If you’re gonna create a company, the first thing you should try to do is create a working prototype.” Not a pitch deck. Not a business plan. Not a slide with a hockey stick growth curve and a TAM number invented over lunch. A working prototype. Musk: “Everything looks great on PowerPoint. You can make anything work on PowerPoint.” That line should follow people home. Because he’s right. Cold fusion works on PowerPoint. Faster-than-light travel works on PowerPoint. Your startup that burns $4 million a quarter with zero product-market fit works on PowerPoint. Slides don’t have physics. Slides don’t have friction. Slides don’t have consequences. That’s why people love them. Musk: “If you have an actual demonstration article, even if it’s in primitive form, that’s much, much more effective for convincing people.” Even if it’s ugly. Even if it crashes every third run and looks like it was assembled in a weekend. A crude prototype that limps through a demo will always destroy a beautiful deck that builds nothing. Always. Because a prototype can’t lie to you. A slide can promise the future. A prototype has to survive the present. The world is full of people who pitch. Nearly empty of people who build. School trained you to present. Corporate trained you to present. Venture capital trained you to present. The entire professional world is built to produce people who are brilliant in a conference room and useless in a garage. Musk builds rockets. Then talks about them. Everyone else talks about rockets. Then asks for funding to explore whether building one is even feasible. The distance between those two approaches is the distance between the people who actually reshape the world and the people who give TED talks about reshaping it. You’ve been trained your entire life to polish the pitch instead of build the thing. And you might not even know it. The most honest act left in business is to build something real, set it on a table, and let it speak for itself. No deck. No narrative. No spin. Just the work. PowerPoint is where ideas perform. The prototype is where they’re forced to be real. Most people spend entire careers in a world where the performance is enough. Until someone walks in with the thing that actually works. And every slide in the room goes quiet.

Elon Musk just described the one thing most founders in Silicon Valley have never actually done. Musk: “If you’re gonna create a company, the first thing you should try to do is create a working prototype.” Not a pitch deck. Not a business plan. Not a slide with a hockey stick growth curve and a TAM number invented over lunch. A working prototype. Musk: “Everything looks great on PowerPoint. You can make anything work on PowerPoint.” That line should follow people home. Because he’s right. Cold fusion works on PowerPoint. Faster-than-light travel works on PowerPoint. Your startup that burns $4 million a quarter with zero product-market fit works on PowerPoint. Slides don’t have physics. Slides don’t have friction. Slides don’t have consequences. That’s why people love them. Musk: “If you have an actual demonstration article, even if it’s in primitive form, that’s much, much more effective for convincing people.” Even if it’s ugly. Even if it crashes every third run and looks like it was assembled in a weekend. A crude prototype that limps through a demo will always destroy a beautiful deck that builds nothing. Always. Because a prototype can’t lie to you. A slide can promise the future. A prototype has to survive the present. The world is full of people who pitch. Nearly empty of people who build. School trained you to present. Corporate trained you to present. Venture capital trained you to present. The entire professional world is built to produce people who are brilliant in a conference room and useless in a garage. Musk builds rockets. Then talks about them. Everyone else talks about rockets. Then asks for funding to explore whether building one is even feasible. The distance between those two approaches is the distance between the people who actually reshape the world and the people who give TED talks about reshaping it. You’ve been trained your entire life to polish the pitch instead of build the thing. And you might not even know it. The most honest act left in business is to build something real, set it on a table, and let it speak for itself. No deck. No narrative. No spin. Just the work. PowerPoint is where ideas perform. The prototype is where they’re forced to be real. Most people spend entire careers in a world where the performance is enough. Until someone walks in with the thing that actually works. And every slide in the room goes quiet.

Dustin

35,963 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

hair loss after 40 isn't sudden and it's almost never random it's the result of a long, slow biological shift that most men don't see coming until it's already well underway and by the time they notice, they reach for the first product they find and wonder why nothing works here's what's actually happening: at the center of it is DHT, dihydrotestosterone, a potent androgen your body converts from testosterone via an enzyme called 5-alpha reductase DHT binds to receptors in your hair follicles, specifically in areas like the temples and crown, and slowly miniaturizes them it shortens the growth phase of each hair cycle and extends the resting phase over time your strands get thinner, weaker, and eventually the follicle goes dormant but dormant isn't dead that distinction matters more than most men realize the problem is DHT isn't working alone alongside the hormonal shift, your scalp environment is also deteriorating and this is the part almost nobody talks about chronic low-grade inflammation, fibrosis (the gradual stiffening of scalp tissue), and reduced microcirculation all compound the damage your follicles can't receive oxygen properly, can't absorb nutrients, can't respond to hormonal signals the way they used to so even follicles that aren't fully miniaturized start struggling to produce thick, pigmented hair which creates the illusion that the loss is worse or more permanent than it actually is then there's the cellular layer your dermal papilla cells, the structures at the base of each follicle that regulate hair growth, lose efficiency with age oxidative stress, reduced ATP production, slower cellular turnover it means even if you control DHT, the follicle still needs active stimulation to re-enter a real growth phase this is where most approaches break down they pick one variable, usually DHT and treat it in isolation but hair loss is a multi-variable problem hormonal, vascular, cellular, structural, all happening at once fix one and ignore the rest and you'll get limited results at best so what actually works mechanical stimulation is one of the most underrated tools available microneedling creates controlled micro-injury to the scalp, which triggers your body to upregulate growth factors like VEGF and activates something called the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, both of which are directly involved in initiating the growth phase and increasing follicular size it essentially wakes up follicles that have been suppressed but not destroyed it also increases blood flow and improves absorption of anything topical you apply afterward which brings up vascularization because hair follicles are some of the most metabolically active structures in the body they need a consistent supply of oxygen and nutrients to sustain growth anything that increases nitric oxide production, reduces calcification, and improves blood flow to the scalp will have an outsized impact on density and thickness over time internal support matters too, especially after 40 your body's ability to absorb and use key nutrients declines with age protein, iron, zinc, vitamin D, B vitamins, deficiencies in any of these directly affect keratin production, follicular cycling, and hair shaft integrity if you're not addressing what's happening internally, topical and external interventions will always hit a ceiling and then there's the timeline issue most men quit too early because they misunderstand how hair growth actually works each follicle cycles independently through growth, transition, and resting phases that span months you might see reduced shedding or improved thickness at 8–12 weeks but visible density changes take 4-6 months of consistent effort full results often take closer to 9-12 months the men who get results aren't doing something exotic they're doing the right things long enough and broadly enough to actually shift the biology that's the real unlock not a miracle ingredient, not a single device, a coordinated protocol that hits the hormonal, vascular, cellular, and structural levers at the same time most men fail not because they didn't try but because they tried one thing at a time, in fragments, for not long enough, and concluded that regrowth wasn't possible for them it usually is follicles that have been dormant for years can still be reactivated but only if the inhibitory signals are reduced and the growth environment is rebuilt that requires treating this like the biological process it is not a cosmetic problem you mask with a spray the men who approach it that way are the ones who don't just stop the progression they reverse it. and what makes that possible isn't just understanding the biology it's consistently applying a method that can actually influence it at the cellular level that's where low-level laser therapy comes in LLLT is one of the few clinically studied interventions shown to stimulate mitochondrial activity inside dermal papilla cells, increase ATP production, and improve blood flow to the scalp all of which directly support the transition of follicles back into the anagen phase devices like the Kiierr laser cap are built around this principle specific wavelengths of red light penetrate the scalp and activate these biological pathways in a way that's non-invasive and sustainable over long periods of use which matters because hair regrowth isn't about intensity it's about consistency tools that make consistency effortless will always outperform ones that rely on motivation or sporadic effort when you layer this kind of stimulation on top of DHT management, improved scalp health, and proper internal support, it stops being a single solution it becomes part of a system that actually aligns with how hair growth works and results from that kind of system compound over time instead of plateauing early like most surface-level treatments do the difference isn't whether you're over 40 it's whether you're finally addressing the problem at the level it was created

hair loss after 40 isn't sudden and it's almost never random it's the result of a long, slow biological shift that most men don't see coming until it's already well underway and by the time they notice, they reach for the first product they find and wonder why nothing works here's what's actually happening: at the center of it is DHT, dihydrotestosterone, a potent androgen your body converts from testosterone via an enzyme called 5-alpha reductase DHT binds to receptors in your hair follicles, specifically in areas like the temples and crown, and slowly miniaturizes them it shortens the growth phase of each hair cycle and extends the resting phase over time your strands get thinner, weaker, and eventually the follicle goes dormant but dormant isn't dead that distinction matters more than most men realize the problem is DHT isn't working alone alongside the hormonal shift, your scalp environment is also deteriorating and this is the part almost nobody talks about chronic low-grade inflammation, fibrosis (the gradual stiffening of scalp tissue), and reduced microcirculation all compound the damage your follicles can't receive oxygen properly, can't absorb nutrients, can't respond to hormonal signals the way they used to so even follicles that aren't fully miniaturized start struggling to produce thick, pigmented hair which creates the illusion that the loss is worse or more permanent than it actually is then there's the cellular layer your dermal papilla cells, the structures at the base of each follicle that regulate hair growth, lose efficiency with age oxidative stress, reduced ATP production, slower cellular turnover it means even if you control DHT, the follicle still needs active stimulation to re-enter a real growth phase this is where most approaches break down they pick one variable, usually DHT and treat it in isolation but hair loss is a multi-variable problem hormonal, vascular, cellular, structural, all happening at once fix one and ignore the rest and you'll get limited results at best so what actually works mechanical stimulation is one of the most underrated tools available microneedling creates controlled micro-injury to the scalp, which triggers your body to upregulate growth factors like VEGF and activates something called the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, both of which are directly involved in initiating the growth phase and increasing follicular size it essentially wakes up follicles that have been suppressed but not destroyed it also increases blood flow and improves absorption of anything topical you apply afterward which brings up vascularization because hair follicles are some of the most metabolically active structures in the body they need a consistent supply of oxygen and nutrients to sustain growth anything that increases nitric oxide production, reduces calcification, and improves blood flow to the scalp will have an outsized impact on density and thickness over time internal support matters too, especially after 40 your body's ability to absorb and use key nutrients declines with age protein, iron, zinc, vitamin D, B vitamins, deficiencies in any of these directly affect keratin production, follicular cycling, and hair shaft integrity if you're not addressing what's happening internally, topical and external interventions will always hit a ceiling and then there's the timeline issue most men quit too early because they misunderstand how hair growth actually works each follicle cycles independently through growth, transition, and resting phases that span months you might see reduced shedding or improved thickness at 8–12 weeks but visible density changes take 4-6 months of consistent effort full results often take closer to 9-12 months the men who get results aren't doing something exotic they're doing the right things long enough and broadly enough to actually shift the biology that's the real unlock not a miracle ingredient, not a single device, a coordinated protocol that hits the hormonal, vascular, cellular, and structural levers at the same time most men fail not because they didn't try but because they tried one thing at a time, in fragments, for not long enough, and concluded that regrowth wasn't possible for them it usually is follicles that have been dormant for years can still be reactivated but only if the inhibitory signals are reduced and the growth environment is rebuilt that requires treating this like the biological process it is not a cosmetic problem you mask with a spray the men who approach it that way are the ones who don't just stop the progression they reverse it. and what makes that possible isn't just understanding the biology it's consistently applying a method that can actually influence it at the cellular level that's where low-level laser therapy comes in LLLT is one of the few clinically studied interventions shown to stimulate mitochondrial activity inside dermal papilla cells, increase ATP production, and improve blood flow to the scalp all of which directly support the transition of follicles back into the anagen phase devices like the Kiierr laser cap are built around this principle specific wavelengths of red light penetrate the scalp and activate these biological pathways in a way that's non-invasive and sustainable over long periods of use which matters because hair regrowth isn't about intensity it's about consistency tools that make consistency effortless will always outperform ones that rely on motivation or sporadic effort when you layer this kind of stimulation on top of DHT management, improved scalp health, and proper internal support, it stops being a single solution it becomes part of a system that actually aligns with how hair growth works and results from that kind of system compound over time instead of plateauing early like most surface-level treatments do the difference isn't whether you're over 40 it's whether you're finally addressing the problem at the level it was created

Kiierr

28,418 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Everyone’s been asking me how I make TikTok slideshows for my apps that actually convert…. Here’s exactly what I do. I’ll use Cal AI as an example below: • Keep it to 5 slides Max • Find high quality images from Pinterest • Make the 1st slide a strong hook that makes people stop scrolling • Provide actual value throughout the slideshow, not just a promotion • On the 4th slide, add your CTA with 2 app screenshots ( Make it subtle the CTA, look at my reference below) • Include an App Store screenshot so viewers recognize your app icon if they see it again later, there more likely to download. • Use a viral sound that matches the aesthetic of the pictures. This simple format has consistently been one of the best performing organic growth strategies for one of my apps and it’s so easy.

Everyone’s been asking me how I make TikTok slideshows for my apps that actually convert…. Here’s exactly what I do. I’ll use Cal AI as an example below: • Keep it to 5 slides Max • Find high quality images from Pinterest • Make the 1st slide a strong hook that makes people stop scrolling • Provide actual value throughout the slideshow, not just a promotion • On the 4th slide, add your CTA with 2 app screenshots ( Make it subtle the CTA, look at my reference below) • Include an App Store screenshot so viewers recognize your app icon if they see it again later, there more likely to download. • Use a viral sound that matches the aesthetic of the pictures. This simple format has consistently been one of the best performing organic growth strategies for one of my apps and it’s so easy.

Lino

21,046 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

most AI chatbots break when you ask a question that requires info from multiple sources for example try asking: “which client contracts are finishing up this month?” you’ll get a half-answer — or none at all why? because traditional chatbots only look at small snippets of your docs - they don’t understand how things connect across clients, services, timelines that’s where knowledge graphs come in they let you turn messy contracts into a web of relationships — like: "Client → Contract Type → Service Provided → End Date" so instead of guessing from a few chunks of text, your chatbot can search across all your clients and contracts to give accurate answers I made a full walkthrough on how I built this: – how to organize your contracts so an AI can actually use them – how to define what matters (like who signed what, and when) – how to get the AI to figure out what info it needs and where to find it – and how to feed that back into your chatbot so it gives accurate answers reply “graph” and I’ll DM it to you (must be following)

most AI chatbots break when you ask a question that requires info from multiple sources for example try asking: “which client contracts are finishing up this month?” you’ll get a half-answer — or none at all why? because traditional chatbots only look at small snippets of your docs - they don’t understand how things connect across clients, services, timelines that’s where knowledge graphs come in they let you turn messy contracts into a web of relationships — like: "Client → Contract Type → Service Provided → End Date" so instead of guessing from a few chunks of text, your chatbot can search across all your clients and contracts to give accurate answers I made a full walkthrough on how I built this: – how to organize your contracts so an AI can actually use them – how to define what matters (like who signed what, and when) – how to get the AI to figure out what info it needs and where to find it – and how to feed that back into your chatbot so it gives accurate answers reply “graph” and I’ll DM it to you (must be following)

Tyler

24,994 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce