Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

My guy John Owning explains why a high end pass rush impacts way more than sacks. The Broncos edge duo forced offenses to change protections, which created easier coverage assignments for the entire defense. If Dallas develops that same kind of tandem with Ezeiruaku & Malachi Lawrence under Christian... show more

Skywalker Steele⚡️

19,456 subscribers

57,681 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Early in the draft process, Blake made the argument that a high-level defensive tackle would help Myles Garrett more than another high-level edge rusher like Abdul Carter. We asked Joe Thomas if he agreed or disagreed: "The more impactful position is the guy who's going to be right next to Myles. Having a dominant presence on the inside is going to help your defensive end pass rusher way more than a dominant defensive end on the other side." The Hall of Fame left tackle explained the difference from his perspective on the offensive line.

Early in the draft process, Blake made the argument that a high-level defensive tackle would help Myles Garrett more than another high-level edge rusher like Abdul Carter. We asked Joe Thomas if he agreed or disagreed: "The more impactful position is the guy who's going to be right next to Myles. Having a dominant presence on the inside is going to help your defensive end pass rusher way more than a dominant defensive end on the other side." The Hall of Fame left tackle explained the difference from his perspective on the offensive line.

The Dawgs - A Cleveland Browns Podcast

33,208 views • 1 year ago

DJ Akademiks explains why he thinks Jay-Z would be an easier rap battle opponent for Drake than Kendrick Lamar was, saying Drake would have more material to work with due to Jay-Z's highly public life 👀 "I do actually think that Jay-Z is an easier matchup for Drake than Kendrick was. I think Kendrick has lived a private personal life... He's not Jay-Z, who, yes, Jay-Z is kind of like, 'For the culture.' But I could list off 30 things now where he's a hypocrite."

DJ Akademiks explains why he thinks Jay-Z would be an easier rap battle opponent for Drake than Kendrick Lamar was, saying Drake would have more material to work with due to Jay-Z's highly public life 👀 "I do actually think that Jay-Z is an easier matchup for Drake than Kendrick was. I think Kendrick has lived a private personal life... He's not Jay-Z, who, yes, Jay-Z is kind of like, 'For the culture.' But I could list off 30 things now where he's a hypocrite."

HotNewHipHop

155,985 views • 3 months ago

John Fetterman with a simple heuristic: 'You're losing politically if you're telling people to not believe what their eyes are seeing': Joe Rogan: "It's this kind of bullshit way of communicating, that's not authentic. Trump is not polished, but you get a sense of who he is as a human being. There doesn't seem to be a veil. At least you know that he's the guy that is talking. People trust that, way more than they trust someone who is polished but full of shit." John Fetterman: "You're losing politically if you're telling people to not believe what their eyes are seeing" Newsflash: John Fetterman claims Democrats have been losing politically for the last 4 years.

John Fetterman with a simple heuristic: 'You're losing politically if you're telling people to not believe what their eyes are seeing': Joe Rogan: "It's this kind of bullshit way of communicating, that's not authentic. Trump is not polished, but you get a sense of who he is as a human being. There doesn't seem to be a veil. At least you know that he's the guy that is talking. People trust that, way more than they trust someone who is polished but full of shit." John Fetterman: "You're losing politically if you're telling people to not believe what their eyes are seeing" Newsflash: John Fetterman claims Democrats have been losing politically for the last 4 years.

Eric Abbenante

12,094,419 views • 1 year ago

John Bowers talking about Bell Labs ties directly into my $NOK thesis He said that Bell Labs worked because it had the experts for an entire network transition under one roof. When the world shifted from microwave transmission to optical networks, Bell Labs had the fibers, lasers, modulators, detectors, electronics, and system people close enough to move fast. That is why Bell Labs was so imporatnt. It was built for architecture shifts. AI has created another one. "The data center is becoming a machine". The network is becoming part of that machine. That is why Nokia owning Bell Labs is a massive differentiator and call option. Scroll to 10:09 if you want to hear some Bell Labs commentary

John Bowers talking about Bell Labs ties directly into my $NOK thesis He said that Bell Labs worked because it had the experts for an entire network transition under one roof. When the world shifted from microwave transmission to optical networks, Bell Labs had the fibers, lasers, modulators, detectors, electronics, and system people close enough to move fast. That is why Bell Labs was so imporatnt. It was built for architecture shifts. AI has created another one. "The data center is becoming a machine". The network is becoming part of that machine. That is why Nokia owning Bell Labs is a massive differentiator and call option. Scroll to 10:09 if you want to hear some Bell Labs commentary

Gaetano

72,556 views • 3 months ago

. G | Ethena explains Ethena Pay and lays out why owning the entire stack matters by pointing to how Coinbase captures 60% of Circle's USDC revenue "A lot of the products in the market haven't got the full vertical integration between owning the stablecoin infrastructure, the yield generation engine, and the front end that sits on top. Taking a debit card and putting it on someone else's stablecoin means you lose the most valuable piece of the entire chain, the stablecoin sitting in the background" "If you're creating one of these platforms and you don't own the whole stack, the issuance of the stablecoins, the generation of the yield, and all the UX and cards and spending on top of it, you've lost the beating heart of these businesses" "People speak a lot about the Coinbase and Circle deal, where Coinbase makes something like 60% of the revenues of the USDC sitting there. If you always depend on the distribution of others, there isn't that much margin left for you in the end. If you never own the user, you can never control that economic relationship in a much more powerful way" Ethena

. G | Ethena explains Ethena Pay and lays out why owning the entire stack matters by pointing to how Coinbase captures 60% of Circle's USDC revenue "A lot of the products in the market haven't got the full vertical integration between owning the stablecoin infrastructure, the yield generation engine, and the front end that sits on top. Taking a debit card and putting it on someone else's stablecoin means you lose the most valuable piece of the entire chain, the stablecoin sitting in the background" "If you're creating one of these platforms and you don't own the whole stack, the issuance of the stablecoins, the generation of the yield, and all the UX and cards and spending on top of it, you've lost the beating heart of these businesses" "People speak a lot about the Coinbase and Circle deal, where Coinbase makes something like 60% of the revenues of the USDC sitting there. If you always depend on the distribution of others, there isn't that much margin left for you in the end. If you never own the user, you can never control that economic relationship in a much more powerful way" Ethena

MR SHIFT 🦁

14,125 views • 11 days ago

NIL could have a new meaning in the NFL: National Insert League. I manually charted every snap of the entire 2025 Rams offense, the highest scoring team in the NFL. Insert action was everywhere: motions, alignments, blocks and play action, with both wide receivers and tight ends. Including the playoffs, roughly one third of their under center first and second down plays featured some kind of insert component. Duo accounted for nearly 40% of their run offense, the highest rate in the NFL according to Fantasy Points Data. Many of those runs featured insert blocks. On under center early downs, their runs with insert action produced 5.05 yards per play, a 53.5% success rate and +0.07 EPA per play. But their duo identity created an incredible dilemma for defenses: commit inside to stop it, and risk getting outflanked outside to that same side. Running outside zone toward the three player side of 3x1 formations, the Rams produced 565 yards on 81 carries: 7.0 yards per carry, a 61.7% success rate and +0.23 EPA per play. Watching those runs, what stood out was how often they got the edge of the defense for big gains. The frequency was staggering. Looking through at least a decade of data, I couldn’t find another team remotely close to that effectiveness on those runs. They could do it from 11 or 13 personnel, running both duo and outside zone and presenting the same problem with different personnel on the field. Widen to protect the edge, and they could come right back to duo. React aggressively to the insert action, and they could throw behind you. The insert wasn’t just a wrinkle. It helped tie the interior run, perimeter run and play action game together. My top offensive trend prediction for the 2026 season: more teams building around insert action, pairing duo inside with outside zone to the same side, and tying it together with play action. Examples below:

NIL could have a new meaning in the NFL: National Insert League. I manually charted every snap of the entire 2025 Rams offense, the highest scoring team in the NFL. Insert action was everywhere: motions, alignments, blocks and play action, with both wide receivers and tight ends. Including the playoffs, roughly one third of their under center first and second down plays featured some kind of insert component. Duo accounted for nearly 40% of their run offense, the highest rate in the NFL according to Fantasy Points Data. Many of those runs featured insert blocks. On under center early downs, their runs with insert action produced 5.05 yards per play, a 53.5% success rate and +0.07 EPA per play. But their duo identity created an incredible dilemma for defenses: commit inside to stop it, and risk getting outflanked outside to that same side. Running outside zone toward the three player side of 3x1 formations, the Rams produced 565 yards on 81 carries: 7.0 yards per carry, a 61.7% success rate and +0.23 EPA per play. Watching those runs, what stood out was how often they got the edge of the defense for big gains. The frequency was staggering. Looking through at least a decade of data, I couldn’t find another team remotely close to that effectiveness on those runs. They could do it from 11 or 13 personnel, running both duo and outside zone and presenting the same problem with different personnel on the field. Widen to protect the edge, and they could come right back to duo. React aggressively to the insert action, and they could throw behind you. The insert wasn’t just a wrinkle. It helped tie the interior run, perimeter run and play action game together. My top offensive trend prediction for the 2026 season: more teams building around insert action, pairing duo inside with outside zone to the same side, and tying it together with play action. Examples below:

Ryan Paganetti

299,291 views • 12 days ago

Ireland is racist…. The new kind of racism to bring about replacement migration. Selective outrage and selective attention. Two men die in the same city. The response couldn’t look more different. One case dominates headlines, sparks political statements, vigils, protests and international discussion. The other passes with barely more than local coverage and scattered online comments. Naturally, people begin asking why. It creates the awareness that some stories are elevated because they support a wider narrative — about racism, society, or institutions — while others are quietly forgotten. And when people notice that imbalance, trust starts to erode and the awakening begins. Not every event is framed the same way. Not every victim receives equal public sympathy or media focus. Increasingly, people feel the news is doing more than reporting facts, it’s shaping which stories matter….. but to whom…. and for what outcome?

Ireland is racist…. The new kind of racism to bring about replacement migration. Selective outrage and selective attention. Two men die in the same city. The response couldn’t look more different. One case dominates headlines, sparks political statements, vigils, protests and international discussion. The other passes with barely more than local coverage and scattered online comments. Naturally, people begin asking why. It creates the awareness that some stories are elevated because they support a wider narrative — about racism, society, or institutions — while others are quietly forgotten. And when people notice that imbalance, trust starts to erode and the awakening begins. Not every event is framed the same way. Not every victim receives equal public sympathy or media focus. Increasingly, people feel the news is doing more than reporting facts, it’s shaping which stories matter….. but to whom…. and for what outcome?

Melissa Ciummei

26,986 views • 3 months ago

I just caught this CBC segment addressing youth unemployment rates and tying it to boomers who won’t retire and clear room for the younger generations. If you’ve been following me I have said the same thing and I can’t believe the CBC sounds like me now. Boomers were hired out of high school and trained on the job then artificially created job security by developing the Human Resources Industrial Complex which made the exact same careers harder and harder to achieve with more regulations, more education, and more certifications. There are almost zero entry level jobs for Gen Z in order to build a resume with experience and references to move up in the world. Boomers need to get out of the way already. They predominantly voted for the policies that created the cost of living crisis. They need to own it and live in it.

I just caught this CBC segment addressing youth unemployment rates and tying it to boomers who won’t retire and clear room for the younger generations. If you’ve been following me I have said the same thing and I can’t believe the CBC sounds like me now. Boomers were hired out of high school and trained on the job then artificially created job security by developing the Human Resources Industrial Complex which made the exact same careers harder and harder to achieve with more regulations, more education, and more certifications. There are almost zero entry level jobs for Gen Z in order to build a resume with experience and references to move up in the world. Boomers need to get out of the way already. They predominantly voted for the policies that created the cost of living crisis. They need to own it and live in it.

Millennial Grump

168,050 views • 1 year ago

Clavicular says looks matter more than money for women and explains why incomemaxxing is a losing strategy for most men "The highest thing women look for is still looks over wealth. That's been very easily disproven by a lot of the self report studies and dating apps reporting their data." "A lot of women won't even give you the time of day to prove your value or your income if you're an ugly motherfucker. If you can't even have that first interaction go well, there's no way to build rapport." "Even making a million dollars a year, top 0.025 percentile in the United States, going against a good looking guy you're probably still going to be at a huge deficit in the dating market. Improving 20 percentiles in looks is much more achievable, which is why I think as a general rule of thumb looksmaxxing is a better way to improve yourself as a man than income and status."

Clavicular says looks matter more than money for women and explains why incomemaxxing is a losing strategy for most men "The highest thing women look for is still looks over wealth. That's been very easily disproven by a lot of the self report studies and dating apps reporting their data." "A lot of women won't even give you the time of day to prove your value or your income if you're an ugly motherfucker. If you can't even have that first interaction go well, there's no way to build rapport." "Even making a million dollars a year, top 0.025 percentile in the United States, going against a good looking guy you're probably still going to be at a huge deficit in the dating market. Improving 20 percentiles in looks is much more achievable, which is why I think as a general rule of thumb looksmaxxing is a better way to improve yourself as a man than income and status."

Kai

780,161 views • 5 months ago

One radical idea: end gerrymandering through at-large U.S. House seats apportioned by partisan voting patterns. Example: 30 percent of a state votes for Democrats? There are 10 seats in that state in total? 3 go to Democrats. The same would apply for my party. It’s fair, reflects the way people really vote and is more representative than the salamander shaped districts we currently see. Math is fair, everyone understands it, and if voters want to change the apportionment, they have to register and vote differently.

One radical idea: end gerrymandering through at-large U.S. House seats apportioned by partisan voting patterns. Example: 30 percent of a state votes for Democrats? There are 10 seats in that state in total? 3 go to Democrats. The same would apply for my party. It’s fair, reflects the way people really vote and is more representative than the salamander shaped districts we currently see. Math is fair, everyone understands it, and if voters want to change the apportionment, they have to register and vote differently.

Shermichael Singleton

146,815 views • 4 months ago

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Cowboy Space Corp. (fka Aetherflux) raises $275M From founder Baiju Bhatt (prev co-founder of Robinhood): "Our mission is to power humanity from the high frontier." "The concept is about building data centers in space. You can use the stage mass, the actual structure of the upper stage of the rocket to do the job of data centers in space." "You can reuse that mass and volume for the radiator, where our concept calls for actually deploying out the fairing of the rocket as a big radiator." "By going with one monolithic satellite, which is the upper stage of the rocket, you get more GPUs that are interconnected." "So rather than distributing it out over a bunch of smaller satellites, the simplest way to kind of think about that is if you had two racks of GPU servers, one was in this building and one was in that building across the street, that strictly worse than them being in the same building." @emmysteuer

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Cowboy Space Corp. (fka Aetherflux) raises $275M From founder Baiju Bhatt (prev co-founder of Robinhood): "Our mission is to power humanity from the high frontier." "The concept is about building data centers in space. You can use the stage mass, the actual structure of the upper stage of the rocket to do the job of data centers in space." "You can reuse that mass and volume for the radiator, where our concept calls for actually deploying out the fairing of the rocket as a big radiator." "By going with one monolithic satellite, which is the upper stage of the rocket, you get more GPUs that are interconnected." "So rather than distributing it out over a bunch of smaller satellites, the simplest way to kind of think about that is if you had two racks of GPU servers, one was in this building and one was in that building across the street, that strictly worse than them being in the same building." @emmysteuer

MTS

19,702 views • 4 months ago

Great explanation of the China-Japan altercation by Chas Freeman, imho the wisest diplomat ever produced by the US (he's had many roles, including Asst. Secretary of Defense and famously the main interpreter for Nixon during his epochal 1972 China visit) He first describes in his speech the origin of the altercation as being "Japan's threat to extend its defense perimeter to include Taiwan." Afterwards he goes into a longer explanation in the Q&A in which he said: "Prime Minister Takaichi... answer[ed] a hypothetical question in the Diet by suggesting that Taiwan was now once again part of Japan for defense purposes. And this of course would embolden people in Taiwan to continue to pursue independence rather than reassociation with the rest of China, and therefore it is a strategic change of some significance." In effect, as he explains, it's unacceptable to China in several ways: 1) With regards to Japan's colonial history vis a vis Taiwan, it's especially provocative to now once more make Taiwan part of Japan's territory for defense purposes. 2) Because it emboldens independentist forces in Taiwan and therefore makes war MORE likely. This is Japan basically telling independentists: you can go ahead and declare independence, if war breaks out as a result we have your back. If you want an analogy, it's as if Macron announced officially that the French army would militarily defend Catalonia from Spain if it's seceded. 3) Last but not least, it fundamentally challenges the post-WWII settlement, on which the world order is based. As Freeman explains, Taiwan was recovered from Japan under the Cairo and Potsdam declarations - Allied war aims that the U.S. and China fought and bled for together. By re-extending its defense perimeter to Taiwan, Japan is effectively seeking to reverse the outcome of WWII.

Great explanation of the China-Japan altercation by Chas Freeman, imho the wisest diplomat ever produced by the US (he's had many roles, including Asst. Secretary of Defense and famously the main interpreter for Nixon during his epochal 1972 China visit) He first describes in his speech the origin of the altercation as being "Japan's threat to extend its defense perimeter to include Taiwan." Afterwards he goes into a longer explanation in the Q&A in which he said: "Prime Minister Takaichi... answer[ed] a hypothetical question in the Diet by suggesting that Taiwan was now once again part of Japan for defense purposes. And this of course would embolden people in Taiwan to continue to pursue independence rather than reassociation with the rest of China, and therefore it is a strategic change of some significance." In effect, as he explains, it's unacceptable to China in several ways: 1) With regards to Japan's colonial history vis a vis Taiwan, it's especially provocative to now once more make Taiwan part of Japan's territory for defense purposes. 2) Because it emboldens independentist forces in Taiwan and therefore makes war MORE likely. This is Japan basically telling independentists: you can go ahead and declare independence, if war breaks out as a result we have your back. If you want an analogy, it's as if Macron announced officially that the French army would militarily defend Catalonia from Spain if it's seceded. 3) Last but not least, it fundamentally challenges the post-WWII settlement, on which the world order is based. As Freeman explains, Taiwan was recovered from Japan under the Cairo and Potsdam declarations - Allied war aims that the U.S. and China fought and bled for together. By re-extending its defense perimeter to Taiwan, Japan is effectively seeking to reverse the outcome of WWII.

Arnaud Bertrand

112,549 views • 9 months ago

.Palmer Luckey explains why Anthropic’s position is wrong: “Imagine if I said. ‘I would never sell to [some] country the US works with.’ How could the US ever rely on me? And if they get into a position where they have to rely on me— I end up with more power than the President.” “People have tried to push back and say, ‘Palmer, you do have a responsibility to have a position beyond that of Congress because no one held Dick Cheney to account for lying about weapons of mass destruction.’” “My point is— now you’re describing a flawed democracy. The fact someone wasn’t held to account just means America didn’t want to hold him to account.” “Who am I to… that’s almost spookier— ‘Oh, I’m going to be the guy that holds Dick Cheney accountable.’ No.” “There is a lot of power that rests with defense industry executives. That is WHY we need to stick to a position that this is in the hands of the people. It cannot be any other way.” “Anyone who says a defense company should be going beyond the law and beyond what legislators and elected leaders say— you’re effectively saying you do not believe in this democratic experiment and that you want a corporatocracy.” Via New York Post

.Palmer Luckey explains why Anthropic’s position is wrong: “Imagine if I said. ‘I would never sell to [some] country the US works with.’ How could the US ever rely on me? And if they get into a position where they have to rely on me— I end up with more power than the President.” “People have tried to push back and say, ‘Palmer, you do have a responsibility to have a position beyond that of Congress because no one held Dick Cheney to account for lying about weapons of mass destruction.’” “My point is— now you’re describing a flawed democracy. The fact someone wasn’t held to account just means America didn’t want to hold him to account.” “Who am I to… that’s almost spookier— ‘Oh, I’m going to be the guy that holds Dick Cheney accountable.’ No.” “There is a lot of power that rests with defense industry executives. That is WHY we need to stick to a position that this is in the hands of the people. It cannot be any other way.” “Anyone who says a defense company should be going beyond the law and beyond what legislators and elected leaders say— you’re effectively saying you do not believe in this democratic experiment and that you want a corporatocracy.” Via New York Post

Jawwwn

151,211 views • 6 months ago

Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni, tested under the same conditions 👀 I was working on a new storyboard. After generating it with Seedance 2.0, I gave the exact same prompt + storyboard reference + character reference to Gemini Omni as well. Result: Gemini Omni surprised me with style quality and got closer than I expected in prompt adherence. But Seedance still feels ahead for storyboard execution, motion energy, camera language and environmental interaction. Gemini looks good. Seedance feels directed. You can see them in the video and the storyboard sheet is shown at the end. Which one do you think is more useful for this kind of work?

Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni, tested under the same conditions 👀 I was working on a new storyboard. After generating it with Seedance 2.0, I gave the exact same prompt + storyboard reference + character reference to Gemini Omni as well. Result: Gemini Omni surprised me with style quality and got closer than I expected in prompt adherence. But Seedance still feels ahead for storyboard execution, motion energy, camera language and environmental interaction. Gemini looks good. Seedance feels directed. You can see them in the video and the storyboard sheet is shown at the end. Which one do you think is more useful for this kind of work?

Kōda

36,164 views • 4 months ago

If you’re making life harder than it needs to be in the kitchen, these 14 lazy (but amazing) hacks might just change the game for you. This is Part 1 of some seriously simple kitchen tricks — from shredding chicken in seconds with a mixer, to softening butter and cream cheese without waiting, reviving stale bread, and even turning almost-empty condiment jars into marinades (and jargaritas). These are the kind of low-effort, high-reward tips that make cooking feel way less annoying. Which one are you trying first?

If you’re making life harder than it needs to be in the kitchen, these 14 lazy (but amazing) hacks might just change the game for you. This is Part 1 of some seriously simple kitchen tricks — from shredding chicken in seconds with a mixer, to softening butter and cream cheese without waiting, reviving stale bread, and even turning almost-empty condiment jars into marinades (and jargaritas). These are the kind of low-effort, high-reward tips that make cooking feel way less annoying. Which one are you trying first?

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

10,968 views • 3 months ago

While the Mediterranean diet is certainly healthier for the brain than the so-called "Standard American Diet," it has some serious shortcomings. For example: Job #1 of a brain-healthy diet is to nourish the #brain properly by providing it with all essential nutrients. The foundation of the Mediterranean diet is starchy grains and legumes 🥖🥜, which are low in nutrients and high in anti-nutrients that can block the absorption of key minerals like magnesium, calcium, and zinc. If better brain health is your goal, you'll want to prioritize foods that nourish, protect, and energize your brain. 🍽️ Curious to learn which dietary changes are most worth making and why? That's what my book Change Your Diet, Change Your Mind is all about.

While the Mediterranean diet is certainly healthier for the brain than the so-called "Standard American Diet," it has some serious shortcomings. For example: Job #1 of a brain-healthy diet is to nourish the #brain properly by providing it with all essential nutrients. The foundation of the Mediterranean diet is starchy grains and legumes 🥖🥜, which are low in nutrients and high in anti-nutrients that can block the absorption of key minerals like magnesium, calcium, and zinc. If better brain health is your goal, you'll want to prioritize foods that nourish, protect, and energize your brain. 🍽️ Curious to learn which dietary changes are most worth making and why? That's what my book Change Your Diet, Change Your Mind is all about.

Georgia Ede MD

35,813 views • 2 years ago

Prediction time, because I’m not afraid to shoot my shot. I predict the jury will find Lindsay Clancy insane (not criminally responsible). There is also a possibility of a hung jury and a mistrial, but if that happens, the vote will be significantly in favor of the defense with only a few prosecution holdouts. My prediction is based on the law in Massachusetts, which requires to prosecution to prove a defendant is criminally responsible (sane) beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s a high burden and different than many states and federal law that put the burden on the defense to prove insanity by a preponderance or clear and convincing evidence. The defense presented enough evidence to satisfy both prongs of the insanity test: (1) not knowing right from wrong (thinking her kids would be safe), and (2) not being able to control her actions (male voice commanding her). Either is sufficient for insanity under the Model Penal Code, and the defense has raised reasonable doubt for both. 9 out of 12 female jurors is a good ratio for the defense too. The reality is that Clancy has more support among women. I spoke to Fox News about the possible jury verdicts. Spoiler alert: Lindsay being found not guilty and Patrick being prosecuted is not one of them. If you really believe that Patrick did it, then you may be insane.

Prediction time, because I’m not afraid to shoot my shot. I predict the jury will find Lindsay Clancy insane (not criminally responsible). There is also a possibility of a hung jury and a mistrial, but if that happens, the vote will be significantly in favor of the defense with only a few prosecution holdouts. My prediction is based on the law in Massachusetts, which requires to prosecution to prove a defendant is criminally responsible (sane) beyond a reasonable doubt. That’s a high burden and different than many states and federal law that put the burden on the defense to prove insanity by a preponderance or clear and convincing evidence. The defense presented enough evidence to satisfy both prongs of the insanity test: (1) not knowing right from wrong (thinking her kids would be safe), and (2) not being able to control her actions (male voice commanding her). Either is sufficient for insanity under the Model Penal Code, and the defense has raised reasonable doubt for both. 9 out of 12 female jurors is a good ratio for the defense too. The reality is that Clancy has more support among women. I spoke to Fox News about the possible jury verdicts. Spoiler alert: Lindsay being found not guilty and Patrick being prosecuted is not one of them. If you really believe that Patrick did it, then you may be insane.

Neama Rahmani

272,506 views • 23 days ago

🚨 The Interview That Raised More Questions Than Answers The first mistake Tabz made, in my view, was appearing on national TV while allegedly under the influence. Whether that appearance was intentional or not, it seems to have done more harm than good. Instead of clearing the air, it left many people with more questions than answers. For those who already suspected he could be a state agent, the interview did little to change that perception. If anything, Canary may have unintentionally reinforced the doubts. Many Ugandans have pointed out that, unlike other high-profile victims such as Eddie Mutwe and Alien Skin, Tabz still appeared with his dreadlocks intact after alleged five-day abduction!!! That contrast has fueled even more public speculation. Credibility is earned through transparency, not interviews that leave people with more questions than answers. The DNA | Blessed Friday | Chicken Chicken | Resemblance | Kafeero |

Nanyanzi Gladys

72,807 views • 2 months ago

Chris Williamson shared a difficult truth about changing your life that most people never talk about. “If you do it well, you might have to go through a period where you let go of all of your friends. But the really bad realization is if you do it really well, you might have to do that multiple times throughout your life.” He explains that every major transformation comes with hard decisions and most people think the hardest part of growth is taking the first step. It isn’t. The hardest part is realizing that every major chapter of your life may require you to leave behind people, places, and versions of yourself that no longer align with who you’re becoming. “If you’ve truly changed, don’t expect every friendship to come with you. Sometimes growth means finding your people more than once.” Every meaningful change eventually forces the same question: “Do I want to move forward on my own, or do I want to go back with my friends?” One of the most honest conversations I’ve heard about why so few people actually change.

Chris Williamson shared a difficult truth about changing your life that most people never talk about. “If you do it well, you might have to go through a period where you let go of all of your friends. But the really bad realization is if you do it really well, you might have to do that multiple times throughout your life.” He explains that every major transformation comes with hard decisions and most people think the hardest part of growth is taking the first step. It isn’t. The hardest part is realizing that every major chapter of your life may require you to leave behind people, places, and versions of yourself that no longer align with who you’re becoming. “If you’ve truly changed, don’t expect every friendship to come with you. Sometimes growth means finding your people more than once.” Every meaningful change eventually forces the same question: “Do I want to move forward on my own, or do I want to go back with my friends?” One of the most honest conversations I’ve heard about why so few people actually change.

gomi

40,416 views • 2 months ago