Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Nancy Guthrie Another point no one seems to be talking about: There is a kidnapper (at least 1) and a potential murderer (maybe more) on the streets. Who will be their next target? Yes, this seems to be very targeted abduction (like the Idaho murders), but you still have...

17,792 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Nancy Guthrie If you are following this story, you may want to watch the whole "Savannah goes Home" segment. (Linked below) With her family ruled out as suspects, who is in? I believe someone from Tuscon who crossed paths with Savannah is likely. I believe BAU has drawn up a profile of the abductor and is fasioning words to appeal to him based on the abductor's profile. Is it someone angry, like Bryan Kohberger was angry but not angry because he was a sadistic Loser, serial killer in making, but rather is Porch Guy angry because he feels slighted and wants Savannah to pay. Is this why Savannah is doing the pleas solo? Because they believe she is the target? This abduction never was about ransom money. With the family ruled out, we know the motive was not life insurance/ inheritance. We are down to the motive being far more twisted. We know about the "Talk to her and you will see" reference. What about, "It's never too late. You are not lost or alone." Does BAU believe this is a loner and a messed up type of individual, deeply unhappy with who he is and deeply jealous of Savannah? Someone capable of extreme violence, but hurting inside? I think we will be shocked at what we will come to know. What happened in that house between Porch Guy and Nancy for up to 41 minutes? Was the DNA found inside blood, hair, semen, sweat or touch? The motive of the ransom notes seems to be torturing Savannah as does the motive in the abduction. Could they be connected in this way?

Jennifer Coffindaffer

191,101 views • 5 months ago

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

Chris Unleashed

288,723 views • 10 months ago