Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

.Natalia rode so hard for Claude Code we devoted an episode to how she was using it to automate her job running Every 📧’s consulting practice. Fast forward to five months later, and she rides just as hard for Codex. I had her back on AI & I to...

danshipper's profile picture

Dan Shipper 📧

119,268 subscribers

25,406 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Three months ago, Codex was trash for knowledge work. Now it's my daily driver. I use it for writing, recruiting, deep engineering work, and everything in between. It even keeps me at inbox 0. I chatted with Every 📧's head of growth Austin Austin Tedesco on Every 📧's AI & I about what changed, and why he now spends 80% of his working time in the Codex desktop app too. We get into: - How Codex went from making Austin feel like an idiot to being the place he goes to get stuff done, including complex tasks like writing go-to-market plans using existing material from Slack, Notion, and meeting transcripts. - Why the Codex’s desktop app, which is faster and more reliable than Claude Desktop/Cowork, is the real differentiator. - How I source candidates with Codex by having it identify career arcs, not keywords—my go-to move is identifying organizations likely to teach the skills Every needs for a role, and then find candidates from that pool who have since gone on to work in AI. This is a must-watch for anyone who's wondering whether it’s finally time to give Codex a try. Watch below! Timestamps How Codex went from a tool for senior engineers to a daily driver for knowledge work: 00:00:57 How Claude Code proved that a great coding agent works for any knowledge work: 00:02:42 Austin's switch to Codex: 00:07:24 How Austin set up Codex with folders, keys, and reviewer agents: 00:13:48 Using Codex to brainstorm automations across Gmail, Slack, and Notion: 00:18:24 How Austin manages the human review step when Codex is drafting communications: 00:22:42 Using Codex to build specialized agents inspired by product executive Claire Vo: 00:28:54 Synthesizing meeting transcripts and Slack threads into a go-to-market plan: 00:31:09 Building a live KPI tracker in Notion that agents can read: 00:40:15 Using Codex for recruiting: 00:44:54
58:23

Three months ago, Codex was trash for knowledge work. Now it's my daily driver. I use it for writing, recruiting, deep engineering work, and everything in between. It even keeps me at inbox 0. I chatted with Every 📧's head of growth Austin Austin Tedesco on Every 📧's AI & I about what changed, and why he now spends 80% of his working time in the Codex desktop app too. We get into: - How Codex went from making Austin feel like an idiot to being the place he goes to get stuff done, including complex tasks like writing go-to-market plans using existing material from Slack, Notion, and meeting transcripts. - Why the Codex’s desktop app, which is faster and more reliable than Claude Desktop/Cowork, is the real differentiator. - How I source candidates with Codex by having it identify career arcs, not keywords—my go-to move is identifying organizations likely to teach the skills Every needs for a role, and then find candidates from that pool who have since gone on to work in AI. This is a must-watch for anyone who's wondering whether it’s finally time to give Codex a try. Watch below! Timestamps How Codex went from a tool for senior engineers to a daily driver for knowledge work: 00:00:57 How Claude Code proved that a great coding agent works for any knowledge work: 00:02:42 Austin's switch to Codex: 00:07:24 How Austin set up Codex with folders, keys, and reviewer agents: 00:13:48 Using Codex to brainstorm automations across Gmail, Slack, and Notion: 00:18:24 How Austin manages the human review step when Codex is drafting communications: 00:22:42 Using Codex to build specialized agents inspired by product executive Claire Vo: 00:28:54 Synthesizing meeting transcripts and Slack threads into a go-to-market plan: 00:31:09 Building a live KPI tracker in Notion that agents can read: 00:40:15 Using Codex for recruiting: 00:44:54

Dan Shipper 📧

55,221 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Natalia Quintero (Natalia) runs Every 📧’s seven-figure AI consulting practice, and she just automated her job with Claude Code. She built an AI project manager, Claudie, that cuts her weekly project management workload from 15 hours to just one. It manages the fleet of spreadsheets she uses to manage new clients, track what has been delivered and what hasn’t, and aggregate feedback to improve our services over time. A month ago she would’ve described herself as non-technical, but now she’s a ‘bonafide vibe code addict’—waking up at 6 a.m. everyday to work on Claudie before her meetings start. She’s not just personally neck-deep in AI—she’s also seen it work, and not, in the smartest enterprises in the world. As our head of consulting, she’s worked with top hedge funds, PE, firms, tech companies, and Fortune 500s to help drive AI adoption and automations. I had her on AI&I to talk about: - How to transition a big company into a truly AI-native org - Why enterprise AI adoption only goes as far as CEO adoption - How to empower AI early adopters inside your org - Why you have to carve out space to “play” with AI if you want real transformation If you’re trying to figure out how to actually put AI to work inside your company, this episode is for you. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:00:00 Why successful AI adoption requires coordinated, top-down effort: 00:01:30 How a private equity firm reduced investment memo creation from weeks to 30 minutes: 00:07:05 The benefits of connecting AI to proprietary context: 00:13:30 The plan-delegate-assess-compound framework for engineering teams: 00:15:20 How non-technical team members are becoming vibe coding addicts: 00:17:55 Building Claudie: an AI project manager from scratch: 00:20:50 Why creative exploration time outside the 9-to-5 is essential: 00:23:00 Live demo: How Claudie automates client onboarding and tracking: 00:27:50 The human side of AI: spending less time in spreadsheets, more time with people: 00:38:40
47:14

Natalia Quintero (Natalia) runs Every 📧’s seven-figure AI consulting practice, and she just automated her job with Claude Code. She built an AI project manager, Claudie, that cuts her weekly project management workload from 15 hours to just one. It manages the fleet of spreadsheets she uses to manage new clients, track what has been delivered and what hasn’t, and aggregate feedback to improve our services over time. A month ago she would’ve described herself as non-technical, but now she’s a ‘bonafide vibe code addict’—waking up at 6 a.m. everyday to work on Claudie before her meetings start. She’s not just personally neck-deep in AI—she’s also seen it work, and not, in the smartest enterprises in the world. As our head of consulting, she’s worked with top hedge funds, PE, firms, tech companies, and Fortune 500s to help drive AI adoption and automations. I had her on AI&I to talk about: - How to transition a big company into a truly AI-native org - Why enterprise AI adoption only goes as far as CEO adoption - How to empower AI early adopters inside your org - Why you have to carve out space to “play” with AI if you want real transformation If you’re trying to figure out how to actually put AI to work inside your company, this episode is for you. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:00:00 Why successful AI adoption requires coordinated, top-down effort: 00:01:30 How a private equity firm reduced investment memo creation from weeks to 30 minutes: 00:07:05 The benefits of connecting AI to proprietary context: 00:13:30 The plan-delegate-assess-compound framework for engineering teams: 00:15:20 How non-technical team members are becoming vibe coding addicts: 00:17:55 Building Claudie: an AI project manager from scratch: 00:20:50 Why creative exploration time outside the 9-to-5 is essential: 00:23:00 Live demo: How Claudie automates client onboarding and tracking: 00:27:50 The human side of AI: spending less time in spreadsheets, more time with people: 00:38:40

Dan Shipper 📧

31,655 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

People keep saying GPT-5.5 + Codex mogs Claude Code. So I got OpenAI PM Abhi Muchhal to show me exactly how to use Codex like a pro: 03:48 - What Codex unlocks for PM work 05:34 - How he built his growth dashboard 11:32 - How to build in Codex with Playwright 14:52 - Moving away from PRDs to Codex prototypes 21:23 - 3 automations running before his day starts 28:37 - WhatsApp computer use demo setup 33:05 - Codex takes action inside WhatsApp 37:00 - Building a 1040 tax filing app in Codex 43:42 - What drove ChatGPT to 1B WAU 47:18 - ImageGen 2, the biggest ELO jump of any model 59:26 - How to break into OpenAI as a PM
1:07:06

People keep saying GPT-5.5 + Codex mogs Claude Code. So I got OpenAI PM Abhi Muchhal to show me exactly how to use Codex like a pro: 03:48 - What Codex unlocks for PM work 05:34 - How he built his growth dashboard 11:32 - How to build in Codex with Playwright 14:52 - Moving away from PRDs to Codex prototypes 21:23 - 3 automations running before his day starts 28:37 - WhatsApp computer use demo setup 33:05 - Codex takes action inside WhatsApp 37:00 - Building a 1040 tax filing app in Codex 43:42 - What drove ChatGPT to 1B WAU 47:18 - ImageGen 2, the biggest ELO jump of any model 59:26 - How to break into OpenAI as a PM

Aakash Gupta

105,502 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Documentation used to eat my context window. Two MCPs cut that to 2,800 tokens. ref tools and exa ai 🕒 Key moments 00:00 Introducing ref tools and exa ai MCPs 02:08 Configuring ref tools in Claude Code 03:27 Configuring exa ai in Claude Code 04:37 Demo: Using MCPs to upgrade a Tailwind CSS project 07:22 How to configure MCPs in Cursor 10:14 Comparing Claude Code vs. Cursor performance 12:37 Setting up MCPs for Codex 15:41 Setting up MCPs for DroidFactory 16:40 Pro-tip: How to prompt agents to use MCPs 18:00 The future of AI coding and final thoughts
18:50

Documentation used to eat my context window. Two MCPs cut that to 2,800 tokens. ref tools and exa ai 🕒 Key moments 00:00 Introducing ref tools and exa ai MCPs 02:08 Configuring ref tools in Claude Code 03:27 Configuring exa ai in Claude Code 04:37 Demo: Using MCPs to upgrade a Tailwind CSS project 07:22 How to configure MCPs in Cursor 10:14 Comparing Claude Code vs. Cursor performance 12:37 Setting up MCPs for Codex 15:41 Setting up MCPs for DroidFactory 16:40 Pro-tip: How to prompt agents to use MCPs 18:00 The future of AI coding and final thoughts

Ray Fernando

17,919 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

I'm often asked for the best public example of AI evals done right for a real, production product. I finally have an answer. Teresa Torres shares how she shipped an AI interview coach, and used evals to rapidly squash bugs and improve the product. Teresa shows how she: 1. did error analysis FIRST to find real issues (instead of using generic metrics) 😍 2. used Jupyter notebooks to analyze errors 3. built custom annotation tools + custom widgets in notebooks 4. built a LLM-judge and assertions to test for specific errors 5. iterated through this feedback loop until it worked. 6. kept things simple the whole time It's also probably the best commercial for Jupyter notebooks you can imagine. 🥰 Chapter summary below. Link to YT in next thread 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:45 - The Product: Building an AI Interview Coach 00:06:34 - The Problem: How Do I Know if My AI Coach is Any Good? 00:10:15 - Using Airtable for Traces and Annotation 00:12:15 - Discovering Jupyter Notebooks and Designing the First Evals 00:15:15 - Example Evals: LLM-as-Judge vs. Code-Based Assertions 00:21:00 - Learning Python with ChatGPT to Analyze Eval Results 00:31:00 - VS Code, Custom Tools, and an Eval Investigation Notebook 00:39:45 - Building a Custom Annotation Tool with Claude 00:41:00 - From Personal Project to Production App 00:46:02 - How Should PMs and Engineers Collaborate on AI Products? 00:55:45 - Q&A: Capturing Feedback and Annotations from End Users 00:58:11 - Q&A: Is a Technical Background Necessary to Build AI? 01:02:28 - Q&A: What's Next for Teresa? 01:03:13 - Q&A: Unpacking the Micro-Decisions of Building an AI App
1:10:22

I'm often asked for the best public example of AI evals done right for a real, production product. I finally have an answer. Teresa Torres shares how she shipped an AI interview coach, and used evals to rapidly squash bugs and improve the product. Teresa shows how she: 1. did error analysis FIRST to find real issues (instead of using generic metrics) 😍 2. used Jupyter notebooks to analyze errors 3. built custom annotation tools + custom widgets in notebooks 4. built a LLM-judge and assertions to test for specific errors 5. iterated through this feedback loop until it worked. 6. kept things simple the whole time It's also probably the best commercial for Jupyter notebooks you can imagine. 🥰 Chapter summary below. Link to YT in next thread 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:45 - The Product: Building an AI Interview Coach 00:06:34 - The Problem: How Do I Know if My AI Coach is Any Good? 00:10:15 - Using Airtable for Traces and Annotation 00:12:15 - Discovering Jupyter Notebooks and Designing the First Evals 00:15:15 - Example Evals: LLM-as-Judge vs. Code-Based Assertions 00:21:00 - Learning Python with ChatGPT to Analyze Eval Results 00:31:00 - VS Code, Custom Tools, and an Eval Investigation Notebook 00:39:45 - Building a Custom Annotation Tool with Claude 00:41:00 - From Personal Project to Production App 00:46:02 - How Should PMs and Engineers Collaborate on AI Products? 00:55:45 - Q&A: Capturing Feedback and Annotations from End Users 00:58:11 - Q&A: Is a Technical Background Necessary to Build AI? 01:02:28 - Q&A: What's Next for Teresa? 01:03:13 - Q&A: Unpacking the Micro-Decisions of Building an AI App

Hamel Husain

51,376 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

OpenAI’s hottest app isn’t ChatGPT—it’s Codex. In the last few weeks alone, the Codex team shipped a desktop app, GPT-5.3 Codex (a new flagship model), and Spark, the fastest coding model I’ve ever used. Usage has grown fivefold since January and over a million people now use Codex weekly. Codex was also the app that OpenAI chose to run an ad for in the Super Bowl. I talked to Thibault (Tibo), head of Codex, and Andrew (Andrew Ambrosino), a member of technical staff who built the Codex app, for Every 📧’s AI & I about what OpenAI is building and how they’re using it internally. We get into: - Why they built a GUI instead of a terminal. Terminals work for quick tasks, they say, but feel limiting when you’re running multiple agents in parallel. The IDE, meanwhile, overwhelms users—and the Codex team wants the AI to dynamically decide which tools to show you for a given task. - How they’re teaching the model to read between the lines. Codex is great at following instructions, but optimize too hard in that direction, and it starts taking you literally—like copying a typo directly into the code. The team obsesses over this tradeoff, and is also introducing “personalities,” modes users can toggle between that control how blunt or supportive the model feels. - How OpenAI uses its own coding agent. Codex lets you schedule prompts to run on a recurring basis, and the team has dozens of automations running at all times. For example, one scans for merge conflicts every couple of hours so code is always ready to ship, and another picks a random file from the codebase multiple times a day and hunts for bugs no one would've gone looking for. - Why speed is a dimension of intelligence. OpenAI’s newest model (Spark) is so fast that they actually slow it down so you can read the output. They see the speed enabling three things: staying super in the flow, replacing brittle developer tools with intelligent ones that can adapt on the fly, and redirecting the model mid-task— especially with voice—so coding starts to feel more and more like a conversation. - Code review is the next bottleneck. Models can generate code faster than ever, but someone still has to verify that it works. The team is exploring a future where the model proves its own fix works—retracing the click path a user would take, screenshotting the results, and attaching the evidence to a pull request. This is a must-watch for anyone who uses AI coding agents—and is curious about the future of programming. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:27 OpenAI’s evolving bet on its coding agent: 00:05:27 The choice to invest in a GUI (over a terminal): 00:09:42 The AI workflows that the Codex team relies on to ship: 00:20:38 Teaching Codex how to read between the lines: 00:26:45 Building affordances for a lightening fast model: 00:28:45 Why speed is a dimension of intelligence: 00:33:15 Code review is the next bottleneck for coding agents: 00:36:30 How the Codex team positions against the competition: 00:41:24
46:40

OpenAI’s hottest app isn’t ChatGPT—it’s Codex. In the last few weeks alone, the Codex team shipped a desktop app, GPT-5.3 Codex (a new flagship model), and Spark, the fastest coding model I’ve ever used. Usage has grown fivefold since January and over a million people now use Codex weekly. Codex was also the app that OpenAI chose to run an ad for in the Super Bowl. I talked to Thibault (Tibo), head of Codex, and Andrew (Andrew Ambrosino), a member of technical staff who built the Codex app, for Every 📧’s AI & I about what OpenAI is building and how they’re using it internally. We get into: - Why they built a GUI instead of a terminal. Terminals work for quick tasks, they say, but feel limiting when you’re running multiple agents in parallel. The IDE, meanwhile, overwhelms users—and the Codex team wants the AI to dynamically decide which tools to show you for a given task. - How they’re teaching the model to read between the lines. Codex is great at following instructions, but optimize too hard in that direction, and it starts taking you literally—like copying a typo directly into the code. The team obsesses over this tradeoff, and is also introducing “personalities,” modes users can toggle between that control how blunt or supportive the model feels. - How OpenAI uses its own coding agent. Codex lets you schedule prompts to run on a recurring basis, and the team has dozens of automations running at all times. For example, one scans for merge conflicts every couple of hours so code is always ready to ship, and another picks a random file from the codebase multiple times a day and hunts for bugs no one would've gone looking for. - Why speed is a dimension of intelligence. OpenAI’s newest model (Spark) is so fast that they actually slow it down so you can read the output. They see the speed enabling three things: staying super in the flow, replacing brittle developer tools with intelligent ones that can adapt on the fly, and redirecting the model mid-task— especially with voice—so coding starts to feel more and more like a conversation. - Code review is the next bottleneck. Models can generate code faster than ever, but someone still has to verify that it works. The team is exploring a future where the model proves its own fix works—retracing the click path a user would take, screenshotting the results, and attaching the evidence to a pull request. This is a must-watch for anyone who uses AI coding agents—and is curious about the future of programming. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:27 OpenAI’s evolving bet on its coding agent: 00:05:27 The choice to invest in a GUI (over a terminal): 00:09:42 The AI workflows that the Codex team relies on to ship: 00:20:38 Teaching Codex how to read between the lines: 00:26:45 Building affordances for a lightening fast model: 00:28:45 Why speed is a dimension of intelligence: 00:33:15 Code review is the next bottleneck for coding agents: 00:36:30 How the Codex team positions against the competition: 00:41:24

Dan Shipper 📧

15,588 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Is Claude Code Better Than Cursor? This video is a crystal clear explanation on what makes Claude Code different than Cursor, Codex and Windsurf. A classic whiteboard conversation! Next time he's on the pod (soon) he's going to build an app from scratch that will blow your mind. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro to Claude Code 00:28 Why Claude Code Is Best 02:38 Comparing Cursor, Windsurf & Claude Code 07:41 Using Claude Code with Other IDEs 12:41 Future of AI Coding Tools & Claude’s SDK 19:58 Integrating Codex with Chat GPT 21:14 Best AI Code Review Tools (Devon, CodeRabbit 26:49 Building an App with Claude Code (Step-by-Step) 35:32 Future Plans
37:07

Is Claude Code Better Than Cursor? This video is a crystal clear explanation on what makes Claude Code different than Cursor, Codex and Windsurf. A classic whiteboard conversation! Next time he's on the pod (soon) he's going to build an app from scratch that will blow your mind. TIMESTAMPS: 00:00 Intro to Claude Code 00:28 Why Claude Code Is Best 02:38 Comparing Cursor, Windsurf & Claude Code 07:41 Using Claude Code with Other IDEs 12:41 Future of AI Coding Tools & Claude’s SDK 19:58 Integrating Codex with Chat GPT 21:14 Best AI Code Review Tools (Devon, CodeRabbit 26:49 Building an App with Claude Code (Step-by-Step) 35:32 Future Plans

Riley Brown

115,613 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

When I talk to serious software engineers, they tell me everyone is sleeping on Codex + GPT 5.2 from OpenAI Which is why I was hyped to get an insiders "how to" from Alexander Embiricos product lead for Codex, showing us how he and the team use Codex to ship almost everything at oai. He'll show us how to: - jump into a new repo and start contributing, even as a non-technical PM - run git worktrees to parallelize agent tasks across codex instances - use best practices and to spec out your work and let codex rip We also talk model vs. harness and how to spy on codex development (which is all OSS!) to understand how to optimize your own implementations. This episode is brought to you by our amazing sponsors 🧠🤑 Brex - The intelligent finance platform built for founders 🦎🐛 Greptile - Your AI code review platform Watch it here:
0:47

When I talk to serious software engineers, they tell me everyone is sleeping on Codex + GPT 5.2 from OpenAI Which is why I was hyped to get an insiders "how to" from Alexander Embiricos product lead for Codex, showing us how he and the team use Codex to ship almost everything at oai. He'll show us how to: - jump into a new repo and start contributing, even as a non-technical PM - run git worktrees to parallelize agent tasks across codex instances - use best practices and to spec out your work and let codex rip We also talk model vs. harness and how to spy on codex development (which is all OSS!) to understand how to optimize your own implementations. This episode is brought to you by our amazing sponsors 🧠🤑 Brex - The intelligent finance platform built for founders 🦎🐛 Greptile - Your AI code review platform Watch it here:

claire vo 🖤

48,050 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

THE 64 MINUTE OPENAI CODEX MASTERCLASS IS HERE if you've been meaning to learn Codex, this is the episode for you, we cover: 1/ Claude vs Codex (what's better?) 2/How to run Claude Code inside Codex (really cool) 3/Why GPT 5.5 changed everything for browser agents 4/How to create skills (reusable agents you build once and call by name forever) 5/How to connect Notion with surgical permissions (one database, not the whole workspace) 6/How to use Remotion inside Codex to create videos 7/ How to one-shot full mobile apps in Swift 8/The 4 projects to run on day one to get up to speed fast shoutout to Riley Brown for coming onto The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 for the 5th time. every episode he delivers. this one is the Codex masterclass. if you've been meaning to learn Codex, this is the episode. 100% free i just want to see you build your ideas. watch
1:04:40

THE 64 MINUTE OPENAI CODEX MASTERCLASS IS HERE if you've been meaning to learn Codex, this is the episode for you, we cover: 1/ Claude vs Codex (what's better?) 2/How to run Claude Code inside Codex (really cool) 3/Why GPT 5.5 changed everything for browser agents 4/How to create skills (reusable agents you build once and call by name forever) 5/How to connect Notion with surgical permissions (one database, not the whole workspace) 6/How to use Remotion inside Codex to create videos 7/ How to one-shot full mobile apps in Swift 8/The 4 projects to run on day one to get up to speed fast shoutout to Riley Brown for coming onto The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 for the 5th time. every episode he delivers. this one is the Codex masterclass. if you've been meaning to learn Codex, this is the episode. 100% free i just want to see you build your ideas. watch

GREG ISENBERG

198,339 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Claude Code cracked something open for us Every 📧. Now I ship to codebases I barely know, every feature we ship makes the next one easier, and non-technical members of the team use the terminal. I’m genuinely grateful. So I brought its creators, Cat Wu (cat) and Boris Cherny (Boris Cherny) from Anthropic, on AI & I to say thank you—and to talk about everything they’ve learned from building Claude Code. We get into: • The workflows Anthropic’s smartest engineers use to push Claude Code to its limits. Why they pit subagents against each other to get cleaner results, how they turn past code into leverage, and the slash commands and MCPs they rely on most. • The product lessons behind one of the most loved AI agents in the world. How the team balances simplicity and power—building a tool that anyone can use, but that experts can bend to their will—and their philosophy of “unshipping,” or cutting back whenever there’s a simpler, more intuitive path to user intent. • A peek into the future of coding with AI. The new form factors they’re experimenting with to make Claude Code more autonomous, more reliable, and more accessible to non-technical users This is a must-watch for anyone—both technical and non-technical—who wants to learn how to use Claude Code like the people who built it. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:26 Claude Code’s origin story: 00:02:25 How Anthropic dogfoods Claude Code: 00:07:03 Boris and Cat’s favorite slash commands: 00:14:06 How Boris uses Claude Code to plan feature development: 00:15:49 Everything Anthropic has learned about using sub-agents well: 00:21:53 Use Claude Code to turn past code into leverage: 00:26:16 The product decisions for building an agent that’s simple and powerful: 00:33:14 Making Claude Code accessible to the non-technical user: 00:36:38 The next form factor for coding with AI: 00:45:12
1:10:11

Claude Code cracked something open for us Every 📧. Now I ship to codebases I barely know, every feature we ship makes the next one easier, and non-technical members of the team use the terminal. I’m genuinely grateful. So I brought its creators, Cat Wu (cat) and Boris Cherny (Boris Cherny) from Anthropic, on AI & I to say thank you—and to talk about everything they’ve learned from building Claude Code. We get into: • The workflows Anthropic’s smartest engineers use to push Claude Code to its limits. Why they pit subagents against each other to get cleaner results, how they turn past code into leverage, and the slash commands and MCPs they rely on most. • The product lessons behind one of the most loved AI agents in the world. How the team balances simplicity and power—building a tool that anyone can use, but that experts can bend to their will—and their philosophy of “unshipping,” or cutting back whenever there’s a simpler, more intuitive path to user intent. • A peek into the future of coding with AI. The new form factors they’re experimenting with to make Claude Code more autonomous, more reliable, and more accessible to non-technical users This is a must-watch for anyone—both technical and non-technical—who wants to learn how to use Claude Code like the people who built it. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:26 Claude Code’s origin story: 00:02:25 How Anthropic dogfoods Claude Code: 00:07:03 Boris and Cat’s favorite slash commands: 00:14:06 How Boris uses Claude Code to plan feature development: 00:15:49 Everything Anthropic has learned about using sub-agents well: 00:21:53 Use Claude Code to turn past code into leverage: 00:26:16 The product decisions for building an agent that’s simple and powerful: 00:33:14 Making Claude Code accessible to the non-technical user: 00:36:38 The next form factor for coding with AI: 00:45:12

Dan Shipper 📧

57,568 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

SaaS isn’t dead, it just needs to become agent-native. Linear (Linear) is a great example of how: They pivoted the product to be used by both humans and agents, and that has made them one of the premier software tools in the agent-native era. I had Linear’s cofounder and CEO Karri Saarinen on Every 📧's AI & I to talk about how a product management tool for human software developers became an agent-native tool—and how Linear’s trajectory reveals a bright future for SaaS businesses: - Speed means decisions matter more, not less. AI makes it easy to have an idea and build it without considering whether its existence is justified. When ChatGPT was released, SaaS companies were launching their own chatbots left, right, and center. Instead of jumping on the bandwagon, Linear stopped to consider whether the application was useful. (It wasn’t.) - Just because the technology has changed doesn’t mean your mission should. Karri attributes Linear’s success to never losing sight of what matters: helping teams develop great software. Instead of chasing trends, Linear focused on understanding how AI was impacting its customers’ workflows—and updating its product accordingly. - Agents are now first-class users. Linear never tried to change what it was or did well; it just expanded the user base. Companies can now kick off agents inside Linear, manage them, and track what they're working on alongside the humans on the team, which explains why Codex, Coinbase, and Brex all run their agents on Linear. This is a must watch for anyone interested in how an agent-native SaaS company operates. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction and how Every first discovered Linear: 00:00:39 Why Linear waited to ship AI features instead of rushing to chatbots: 00:02:00 Linear's agent platform and becoming the system that guides AI agents: 00:05:06 Why "SaaS is dead" is a simplistic narrative: 00:07:42 How Linear adopted AI coding tools internally: 00:12:18 AI's impact on product building workflows—speed versus thoughtfulness: 00:17:45 The value of conceptual work and thinking before shipping: 00:22:18 How AI is reshaping Linear's product strategy: 00:29:30 Demo: Linear's agent skills, shared context, and code review workflow: 00:37:18 The future of product development and the enduring role of human judgment: 00:47:48
52:48

SaaS isn’t dead, it just needs to become agent-native. Linear (Linear) is a great example of how: They pivoted the product to be used by both humans and agents, and that has made them one of the premier software tools in the agent-native era. I had Linear’s cofounder and CEO Karri Saarinen on Every 📧's AI & I to talk about how a product management tool for human software developers became an agent-native tool—and how Linear’s trajectory reveals a bright future for SaaS businesses: - Speed means decisions matter more, not less. AI makes it easy to have an idea and build it without considering whether its existence is justified. When ChatGPT was released, SaaS companies were launching their own chatbots left, right, and center. Instead of jumping on the bandwagon, Linear stopped to consider whether the application was useful. (It wasn’t.) - Just because the technology has changed doesn’t mean your mission should. Karri attributes Linear’s success to never losing sight of what matters: helping teams develop great software. Instead of chasing trends, Linear focused on understanding how AI was impacting its customers’ workflows—and updating its product accordingly. - Agents are now first-class users. Linear never tried to change what it was or did well; it just expanded the user base. Companies can now kick off agents inside Linear, manage them, and track what they're working on alongside the humans on the team, which explains why Codex, Coinbase, and Brex all run their agents on Linear. This is a must watch for anyone interested in how an agent-native SaaS company operates. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction and how Every first discovered Linear: 00:00:39 Why Linear waited to ship AI features instead of rushing to chatbots: 00:02:00 Linear's agent platform and becoming the system that guides AI agents: 00:05:06 Why "SaaS is dead" is a simplistic narrative: 00:07:42 How Linear adopted AI coding tools internally: 00:12:18 AI's impact on product building workflows—speed versus thoughtfulness: 00:17:45 The value of conceptual work and thinking before shipping: 00:22:18 How AI is reshaping Linear's product strategy: 00:29:30 Demo: Linear's agent skills, shared context, and code review workflow: 00:37:18 The future of product development and the enduring role of human judgment: 00:47:48

Dan Shipper 📧

36,359 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

How OpenAI made Codex The full episode with Alexander Embiricos is now live: Timestamps 0:00:00 Intro: Meet the Codex Team 0:00:21 Origin Story of Codex 0:15:03 How Users Are Adopting Codex: Surprising Patterns 0:36:38 Is AI Eating Software Engineering? 1:00:05 Building a Startup in the Age of AI Agents 1:07:58 Why Some Students Excel with AI Tools 1:10:56 Hiring at OpenAI: What Stands Out
1:27:08

How OpenAI made Codex The full episode with Alexander Embiricos is now live: Timestamps 0:00:00 Intro: Meet the Codex Team 0:00:21 Origin Story of Codex 0:15:03 How Users Are Adopting Codex: Surprising Patterns 0:36:38 Is AI Eating Software Engineering? 1:00:05 Building a Startup in the Age of AI Agents 1:07:58 Why Some Students Excel with AI Tools 1:10:56 Hiring at OpenAI: What Stands Out

Anjney Midha

31,764 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

In the future, you’ll be able to accomplish a goal by just giving Claude an outcome and a budget. That’s the direction Anthropic is building in with its new Managed Agents features, announced at this week’s Code with Claude developer event. The basic idea: Claude, wrapped in a computer in the cloud, that you can spin up, scale, and manage as needed. Anthropic is taking on the infrastructure that kills most agent products, and making sure that it scales to meet the needs of agents running 24/7. On this week’s AI & I from Every 📧, I talk with Angela Jiang (Angela Jiang), head of product for the Claude platform, and Katelyn Lesse (Katelyn Lesse), head of engineering for the Claude platform, about what Anthropic is building and what it takes to make agents reliable in production. We get into: - Why the "build a generic harness, hot-swap any model behind it" playbook is already outdated. Angela points to eval data on Memory where the same task across different harnesses performed drastically differently. - The infrastructure wall every team hits in production—and why Katelyn thinks “my sandbox died and took the agent with it” is the real reason internal agents don't ship. - Why Anthropic is so bullish on using file systems and skills within Claude, including Angela's argument that those early design choices can compound for years. This is a must-watch for anyone trying to take an agent past the demo and into production. Watch below! Timestamps: How the Claude platform evolved from API to agents: 00:01:48 The primitives that make up Claude Managed Agents: 00:04:09 Why the harness and the model are becoming a single unit: 00:10:37 The infrastructure wall that kills most agent projects in production: 00:18:49 Why team agents need a different shape than individual productivity tools: 00:24:49 How Anthropic's legal team uses an agent to review marketing copy: 00:26:36 Using multi-agent orchestration for advisor strategies, adversarial pairs, and swarms: 00:34:24 How to measure agent success with outcome and budget as the end state: 00:35:50 What the platform looks like a year from now, when Claude writes its own harness: 00:39:11
43:20

In the future, you’ll be able to accomplish a goal by just giving Claude an outcome and a budget. That’s the direction Anthropic is building in with its new Managed Agents features, announced at this week’s Code with Claude developer event. The basic idea: Claude, wrapped in a computer in the cloud, that you can spin up, scale, and manage as needed. Anthropic is taking on the infrastructure that kills most agent products, and making sure that it scales to meet the needs of agents running 24/7. On this week’s AI & I from Every 📧, I talk with Angela Jiang (Angela Jiang), head of product for the Claude platform, and Katelyn Lesse (Katelyn Lesse), head of engineering for the Claude platform, about what Anthropic is building and what it takes to make agents reliable in production. We get into: - Why the "build a generic harness, hot-swap any model behind it" playbook is already outdated. Angela points to eval data on Memory where the same task across different harnesses performed drastically differently. - The infrastructure wall every team hits in production—and why Katelyn thinks “my sandbox died and took the agent with it” is the real reason internal agents don't ship. - Why Anthropic is so bullish on using file systems and skills within Claude, including Angela's argument that those early design choices can compound for years. This is a must-watch for anyone trying to take an agent past the demo and into production. Watch below! Timestamps: How the Claude platform evolved from API to agents: 00:01:48 The primitives that make up Claude Managed Agents: 00:04:09 Why the harness and the model are becoming a single unit: 00:10:37 The infrastructure wall that kills most agent projects in production: 00:18:49 Why team agents need a different shape than individual productivity tools: 00:24:49 How Anthropic's legal team uses an agent to review marketing copy: 00:26:36 Using multi-agent orchestration for advisor strategies, adversarial pairs, and swarms: 00:34:24 How to measure agent success with outcome and budget as the end state: 00:35:50 What the platform looks like a year from now, when Claude writes its own harness: 00:39:11

Dan Shipper 📧

66,339 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

We built an AI app that had 1,000 DAU and $2k MRR before it launched. It’s called Monologue and it’s a smart dictation app built by a single developer: Naveen Naidu. We just launched Monologue yesterday, and it’s one of the fastest-growing and stickiest AI apps that Every 📧 has ever built. Naveen and Monologue are compelling because he’s competing against companies that have raised $50m or more. Because of AI he was able to build an extremely polished, delightful app by himself in just a few months. I brought Naveen on to AI & I along with Every 📧 COO Brandon Gell (Brandon Gell) to talk about his journey with Monologue. We get into: - Why shipping fast is the only thing that matters in AI: Monologue might look like an overnight success, but it wasn’t Naveen’s first, second—or even third—app. Over time, he built a muscle to get quality apps out the door, iterate on them, and learn from what he was seeing. - How he got to PMF inside of Every: The mistake Naveen regrets most in his entrepreneurial journey is building in the dark. Inside of Every 📧 he has an environment where feedback is plentiful—and it let him iterate extremely quickly. - His stack for building production grade AI apps: Naveen breaks down how he used tools like OpenAI’s Codex to do the work of a whole engineering team, including solving hard technical problems like Mac hotkey handling. This is a must-watch for anyone who wants to see how far a single developer and some AI tools can really go. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:27 A live demo of Monologue: 00:03:51 Hard lessons from Naveen’s years in the wilderness: 00:06:27 Building a muscle to ship fast: 00:12:29 The spark that became Monologue: 00:21:11 Dogfooding your way to a killer feature: 00:26:09 Why the harshest product feedback is the most valuable: 00:29:45 Every’s strategy for launching an app in a crowded space: 00:31:47 Giving Monologue the Every “smell”: 00:40:08 Naveen’s one-person AI stack to build beautiful apps: 00:45:09
57:24

We built an AI app that had 1,000 DAU and $2k MRR before it launched. It’s called Monologue and it’s a smart dictation app built by a single developer: Naveen Naidu. We just launched Monologue yesterday, and it’s one of the fastest-growing and stickiest AI apps that Every 📧 has ever built. Naveen and Monologue are compelling because he’s competing against companies that have raised $50m or more. Because of AI he was able to build an extremely polished, delightful app by himself in just a few months. I brought Naveen on to AI & I along with Every 📧 COO Brandon Gell (Brandon Gell) to talk about his journey with Monologue. We get into: - Why shipping fast is the only thing that matters in AI: Monologue might look like an overnight success, but it wasn’t Naveen’s first, second—or even third—app. Over time, he built a muscle to get quality apps out the door, iterate on them, and learn from what he was seeing. - How he got to PMF inside of Every: The mistake Naveen regrets most in his entrepreneurial journey is building in the dark. Inside of Every 📧 he has an environment where feedback is plentiful—and it let him iterate extremely quickly. - His stack for building production grade AI apps: Naveen breaks down how he used tools like OpenAI’s Codex to do the work of a whole engineering team, including solving hard technical problems like Mac hotkey handling. This is a must-watch for anyone who wants to see how far a single developer and some AI tools can really go. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:27 A live demo of Monologue: 00:03:51 Hard lessons from Naveen’s years in the wilderness: 00:06:27 Building a muscle to ship fast: 00:12:29 The spark that became Monologue: 00:21:11 Dogfooding your way to a killer feature: 00:26:09 Why the harshest product feedback is the most valuable: 00:29:45 Every’s strategy for launching an app in a crowded space: 00:31:47 Giving Monologue the Every “smell”: 00:40:08 Naveen’s one-person AI stack to build beautiful apps: 00:45:09

Dan Shipper 📧

23,644 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

OpenAI released Codex Mobile App Directly on ChatGPT Here's everything you need to know: 1. How to set it up 2. How to fully vibecode from Codex Mobile 3. How to control your computer with Codex Mobile 00:00 Setting Up Codex Mobile on ChatGPT 02:15 Changing Settings - Chats First 03:01 Voice Mode 04:05 Plugins and Skills 05:07 Notifications and Permissions 06:52 Flaws of Vibe Coding Out of the Box 07:13 Vibe Coding Skill (Yolo Mode w Vercel) 10:28 Using ChatGPT app as Full Vibe Coding Platform 12:15 Using ChatGPT to Control my computer 13:33 Where I put all my Agent Skills @chorusskills
14:21

OpenAI released Codex Mobile App Directly on ChatGPT Here's everything you need to know: 1. How to set it up 2. How to fully vibecode from Codex Mobile 3. How to control your computer with Codex Mobile 00:00 Setting Up Codex Mobile on ChatGPT 02:15 Changing Settings - Chats First 03:01 Voice Mode 04:05 Plugins and Skills 05:07 Notifications and Permissions 06:52 Flaws of Vibe Coding Out of the Box 07:13 Vibe Coding Skill (Yolo Mode w Vercel) 10:28 Using ChatGPT app as Full Vibe Coding Platform 12:15 Using ChatGPT to Control my computer 13:33 Where I put all my Agent Skills @chorusskills

Riley Brown

91,912 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Michael Bolin (Michael Bolin) is the tech lead of the Codex open source repository at OpenAI and formerly a distinguished eng (E9) at Meta. I asked him for all the details on his career story and how he uses Codex for max benefit. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:56 - Chickenfoot 00:02:45 - Working at Google 00:06:34 - Overhauling Facebook's build system 00:16:36 - Rewriting Facebook's IDE 00:26:01 - Struggles after Principal Eng (E8) promo 00:28:39 - Building a virtual filesystem for Facebook 00:35:47 - Delayed Distinguished promo (E9) and learnings 00:39:56 - Joining OpenAI 00:43:05 - Research-led vs engineering-led cultures 00:44:53 - The story behind Codex 00:51:00 - How he uses Codex 00:57:00 - Why Codex's harness is open source 00:59:50 - Top technical book recommendations 01:05:02 - Why deep technical skills are still valuable (for now) 01:11:07 - How to start projects well 01:14:27 - Advice on writing better and career planning 01:17:06 - Advice for his younger self 01:19:10 - Outro He was a dream guest of mine and I'm excited to share his story with you all! Other places to watch: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple Podcasts: • Transcript:
1:20:03

Michael Bolin (Michael Bolin) is the tech lead of the Codex open source repository at OpenAI and formerly a distinguished eng (E9) at Meta. I asked him for all the details on his career story and how he uses Codex for max benefit. Timestamps: 00:00:00 - Intro 00:00:56 - Chickenfoot 00:02:45 - Working at Google 00:06:34 - Overhauling Facebook's build system 00:16:36 - Rewriting Facebook's IDE 00:26:01 - Struggles after Principal Eng (E8) promo 00:28:39 - Building a virtual filesystem for Facebook 00:35:47 - Delayed Distinguished promo (E9) and learnings 00:39:56 - Joining OpenAI 00:43:05 - Research-led vs engineering-led cultures 00:44:53 - The story behind Codex 00:51:00 - How he uses Codex 00:57:00 - Why Codex's harness is open source 00:59:50 - Top technical book recommendations 01:05:02 - Why deep technical skills are still valuable (for now) 01:11:07 - How to start projects well 01:14:27 - Advice on writing better and career planning 01:17:06 - Advice for his younger self 01:19:10 - Outro He was a dream guest of mine and I'm excited to share his story with you all! Other places to watch: • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple Podcasts: • Transcript:

Ryan Peterman

119,565 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 OpenAI just launched Codex, a brand-new autonomous coding agent that can build features and fix bugs on its own. We’ve been using it Every 📧 for a few days, and I’m impressed. I invited Alexander Embiricos (ben davies), a member of the product staff responsible for Codex, to demo Codex and talk about it live on a special edition of AI & I: What Codex is and how it works Codex is designed to be used by senior engineers—it performs coding tasks like adding features or fixing bugs autonomously. It's built to allow you to start many sessions at once, so you can have multiple agents working in parallel. Codex is built to have "taste" OpenAI trained Codex to have the taste of a senior software engineer. It knows how big codebases work, how to write a good PR, and uses clean, minimal code. Why an “abundance mindset” is best for interacting with agents Codex is designed to allow users to delegate many tasks at once without getting caught up in the details. This lets you point an abundance of agents at a specific task like a difficult bug—it’s worth it even if only one of them succeeds. How OpenAI is thinking about agents Codex is one piece of a unified super-assistant OpenAI wants to eventually build—an agent that helps users easily get things done by selecting the right tools for them behind the scenes. OpenAI’s vision for the future of programming In the future developers will probably spend less time writing routine code and more time guiding agents, reviewing their work, and making strategy decisions. Programming will become more social, letting teams easily delegate multiple tasks at once, allowing people to focus on ideas and collaboration instead of routine coding. Watch below!
44:33

🚨 OpenAI just launched Codex, a brand-new autonomous coding agent that can build features and fix bugs on its own. We’ve been using it Every 📧 for a few days, and I’m impressed. I invited Alexander Embiricos (ben davies), a member of the product staff responsible for Codex, to demo Codex and talk about it live on a special edition of AI & I: What Codex is and how it works Codex is designed to be used by senior engineers—it performs coding tasks like adding features or fixing bugs autonomously. It's built to allow you to start many sessions at once, so you can have multiple agents working in parallel. Codex is built to have "taste" OpenAI trained Codex to have the taste of a senior software engineer. It knows how big codebases work, how to write a good PR, and uses clean, minimal code. Why an “abundance mindset” is best for interacting with agents Codex is designed to allow users to delegate many tasks at once without getting caught up in the details. This lets you point an abundance of agents at a specific task like a difficult bug—it’s worth it even if only one of them succeeds. How OpenAI is thinking about agents Codex is one piece of a unified super-assistant OpenAI wants to eventually build—an agent that helps users easily get things done by selecting the right tools for them behind the scenes. OpenAI’s vision for the future of programming In the future developers will probably spend less time writing routine code and more time guiding agents, reviewing their work, and making strategy decisions. Programming will become more social, letting teams easily delegate multiple tasks at once, allowing people to focus on ideas and collaboration instead of routine coding. Watch below!

Dan Shipper 📧

145,487 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Noah Brier (Noah Brier) uses Claude Code as his second brain—it’s the coolest notetaking setup I’ve ever seen. He has Claude running on a server in his basement hooked up to a VPN. It stores, reads, and writes to thousands of notes in his Obsidian (Obsidian) vault. He does it all from his phone. I had him on the show to tell us exactly how he’s pulling this off. We get into: - The nuts and bolts of the Claude Code-Obsidian setup: Noah set up Claude Code on top of his Obsidian root directory, and he walked me through how he uses it to prep for an upcoming speech—creating a project folder, pulling in relevant research from his notes, saving transcripts from chats with other LLMs, and generating daily progress updates. - The “thinking partner” that lives inside Noah’s second brain: Noah points out that in the hype around AI’s ability to write, the fact that it can read is overlooked. That’s why he has an agent inside Claude Code with strict guardrails to stay in “thinking mode.” It logs his questions, tracks insights, and catches him up on research if he returns to a project after a few days away. - How Noah does deep work on his phone: Noah rigged a home server in his basement, put his Obsidian vault in it—and then runs Claude Code on top. Noah says that being able to think, write, research, and ship code from his phone has fundamentally changed the way he works. This episode of Every 📧’s AI & I is a must-watch for anyone curious about who wants to learn how to use Claude Code to build a true second brain. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:19 How you can do deep work on your phone: 00:04:28 Why Noah thinks Grok has the best voice AI: 00:06:14 The nuts and bolts of Noah’s Claude Code-Obsidian setup: 00:11:39 Using an agent in Claude Code as a “thinking partner”: 00:23:59 Noah’s Thomas’ English Muffin theory of AI: 00:35:07 The white space still left to explore in AI: 00:44:04 How Noah is preparing his kids for AI: 00:50:41 How he brought his Claude Code setup to mobile: 01:01:54
1:11:52

Noah Brier (Noah Brier) uses Claude Code as his second brain—it’s the coolest notetaking setup I’ve ever seen. He has Claude running on a server in his basement hooked up to a VPN. It stores, reads, and writes to thousands of notes in his Obsidian (Obsidian) vault. He does it all from his phone. I had him on the show to tell us exactly how he’s pulling this off. We get into: - The nuts and bolts of the Claude Code-Obsidian setup: Noah set up Claude Code on top of his Obsidian root directory, and he walked me through how he uses it to prep for an upcoming speech—creating a project folder, pulling in relevant research from his notes, saving transcripts from chats with other LLMs, and generating daily progress updates. - The “thinking partner” that lives inside Noah’s second brain: Noah points out that in the hype around AI’s ability to write, the fact that it can read is overlooked. That’s why he has an agent inside Claude Code with strict guardrails to stay in “thinking mode.” It logs his questions, tracks insights, and catches him up on research if he returns to a project after a few days away. - How Noah does deep work on his phone: Noah rigged a home server in his basement, put his Obsidian vault in it—and then runs Claude Code on top. Noah says that being able to think, write, research, and ship code from his phone has fundamentally changed the way he works. This episode of Every 📧’s AI & I is a must-watch for anyone curious about who wants to learn how to use Claude Code to build a true second brain. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:19 How you can do deep work on your phone: 00:04:28 Why Noah thinks Grok has the best voice AI: 00:06:14 The nuts and bolts of Noah’s Claude Code-Obsidian setup: 00:11:39 Using an agent in Claude Code as a “thinking partner”: 00:23:59 Noah’s Thomas’ English Muffin theory of AI: 00:35:07 The white space still left to explore in AI: 00:44:04 How Noah is preparing his kids for AI: 00:50:41 How he brought his Claude Code setup to mobile: 01:01:54

Dan Shipper 📧

30,792 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

"I ran a startup for 5 years. I thought we moved fast. Then I joined OpenAI—and realized I had no idea what fast actually meant." Head of Product for OpenAI's Codex Alexander Embiricos and I chat about: 🔸 How OpenAI built the Sora Android app (which hit #1) in just 18 days by using Codex 🔸 Codex growing 20x since August 🔸 How they're thinking about the dev bottleneck shifting from coding to reviewing AI-generated work 🔸 Why coding will be a core competency for every AI agent—because writing code is how agents use computers best 🔸 Why the bottleneck to AGI-level productivity isn’t model capability—it’s human typing speed 🔸 The vision of Codex, and how they plan to win Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 WorkOS — Modern identity platform for B2B SaaS, free up to 1 million MAUs: 🏆 Fin — The #1 AI agent for customer service: 🏆 Atlassian Jira Product Discovery — Confidence to build the right thing:
1:38

"I ran a startup for 5 years. I thought we moved fast. Then I joined OpenAI—and realized I had no idea what fast actually meant." Head of Product for OpenAI's Codex Alexander Embiricos and I chat about: 🔸 How OpenAI built the Sora Android app (which hit #1) in just 18 days by using Codex 🔸 Codex growing 20x since August 🔸 How they're thinking about the dev bottleneck shifting from coding to reviewing AI-generated work 🔸 Why coding will be a core competency for every AI agent—because writing code is how agents use computers best 🔸 Why the bottleneck to AGI-level productivity isn’t model capability—it’s human typing speed 🔸 The vision of Codex, and how they plan to win Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 WorkOS — Modern identity platform for B2B SaaS, free up to 1 million MAUs: 🏆 Fin — The #1 AI agent for customer service: 🏆 Atlassian Jira Product Discovery — Confidence to build the right thing:

Lenny Rachitsky

334,422 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

“Coding will eat all knowledge work” Peter Yang joins a16z’s Anish Acharya to discuss the post-AI future of work, why AI will create more solopreneurs, why human ambition means there will always be new jobs, and more. 00:00 Intro 01:56 Using OpenClaw for voice, memory & daily life 06:14 Will agents kill apps & SaaS? 11:57 Coding agents: Claude Code vs. Codex 17:00 Future of work: small teams, agents & company culture 24:00 How agents change consumer products & the economy Peter Yang Anish Acharya
29:44

“Coding will eat all knowledge work” Peter Yang joins a16z’s Anish Acharya to discuss the post-AI future of work, why AI will create more solopreneurs, why human ambition means there will always be new jobs, and more. 00:00 Intro 01:56 Using OpenClaw for voice, memory & daily life 06:14 Will agents kill apps & SaaS? 11:57 Coding agents: Claude Code vs. Codex 17:00 Future of work: small teams, agents & company culture 24:00 How agents change consumer products & the economy Peter Yang Anish Acharya

a16z

96,370 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten