正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

We built an AI app that had 1,000 DAU and $2k MRR before it launched. It’s called Monologue and it’s a smart dictation app built by a single developer: Naveen Naidu. We just launched Monologue yesterday, and it’s one of the fastest-growing and stickiest AI apps that Every 📧...

danshipper's profile picture

Dan Shipper 📧

85,557 subscribers

23,644 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Nat Eliason’s (Nat Eliason) career arc is borderline absurd—but it works. He’ll spot a new tool or trend, master it, build a business around it, and move on. Nat’s pulled it off with the note-taking wave ($600k in sales from a Roam Research course), real estate (6x return flipping property in Austin), and crypto (published his insider story with Random House). Now it’s AI: he’s running a viral course on building apps with AI—$200k in pre-sales in just a week, 800 students and counting. I’ve known Nat for a long time and I think he has a great sense for where the puck is headed. He was one of the first guests I had on the podcast and I was delighted to have him on again. Here are a few takeaways from our conversation: - Coding with AI has become orders of magnitude easier for non-technical people over the last 2 years—Nat rarely has to help students fix bugs; they troubleshoot in Cursor on their own. - AI coding assistants are creating new behaviours in programming, like using a speech-to-text model to talk to an agent and having it write code for you. - The traditional learning curve of coding is flattening because AI tools let beginners build and iterate in faster feedback loops. - AI has given Nat leverage in spades—it increases his ability to be a creator while also building a robust business with as few people to manage as possible. He demos an AI book editor he coded for his sci-fi novel. - In the age of AI, software is becoming content and the barriers to create are lower than ever—but custom software for everything isn’t the answer. Nat’s model is that personalized tools make sense for that one thing you care the most about. - Nat believes that the future of writing with AI is a Cursor-style interface with a model that’s trained on your style and voice. This episode is a must-watch for writers, creators, and anyone interested in the future of product building. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:45 The origins of Nat’s viral course on building apps with AI: 00:11:45 How coding with AI has evolved over the last two years: 00:18:46 Nat creates an app using Composer, Cursor’s AI assistant: 00:22:22 Tactical tips for coding with Cursor: 00:26:06 How coding with AI is creating new behaviours in programming: 00:29:06 What excites Nat the most about the future of AI: 00:32:41 A demo of Hubbard, the AI editor Nat built for his science fiction writing: 00:38:58 When does it makes sense to build custom software: 00:44:52 Nat’s take on the future of writing with AI: 00:49:18
1:00:52

Nat Eliason’s (Nat Eliason) career arc is borderline absurd—but it works. He’ll spot a new tool or trend, master it, build a business around it, and move on. Nat’s pulled it off with the note-taking wave ($600k in sales from a Roam Research course), real estate (6x return flipping property in Austin), and crypto (published his insider story with Random House). Now it’s AI: he’s running a viral course on building apps with AI—$200k in pre-sales in just a week, 800 students and counting. I’ve known Nat for a long time and I think he has a great sense for where the puck is headed. He was one of the first guests I had on the podcast and I was delighted to have him on again. Here are a few takeaways from our conversation: - Coding with AI has become orders of magnitude easier for non-technical people over the last 2 years—Nat rarely has to help students fix bugs; they troubleshoot in Cursor on their own. - AI coding assistants are creating new behaviours in programming, like using a speech-to-text model to talk to an agent and having it write code for you. - The traditional learning curve of coding is flattening because AI tools let beginners build and iterate in faster feedback loops. - AI has given Nat leverage in spades—it increases his ability to be a creator while also building a robust business with as few people to manage as possible. He demos an AI book editor he coded for his sci-fi novel. - In the age of AI, software is becoming content and the barriers to create are lower than ever—but custom software for everything isn’t the answer. Nat’s model is that personalized tools make sense for that one thing you care the most about. - Nat believes that the future of writing with AI is a Cursor-style interface with a model that’s trained on your style and voice. This episode is a must-watch for writers, creators, and anyone interested in the future of product building. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:45 The origins of Nat’s viral course on building apps with AI: 00:11:45 How coding with AI has evolved over the last two years: 00:18:46 Nat creates an app using Composer, Cursor’s AI assistant: 00:22:22 Tactical tips for coding with Cursor: 00:26:06 How coding with AI is creating new behaviours in programming: 00:29:06 What excites Nat the most about the future of AI: 00:32:41 A demo of Hubbard, the AI editor Nat built for his science fiction writing: 00:38:58 When does it makes sense to build custom software: 00:44:52 Nat’s take on the future of writing with AI: 00:49:18

Dan Shipper 📧

27,207 次观看 • 1 年前

In this episode of the Lightcone Podcast, we sat down with Mukund Jha and Madhav Jha, the founders of Emergent - an AI platform that lets anyone build and ship production-ready software. In just eight months, users have created more than 7 million apps on Emergent, with the number doubling in just the last 45 days. We discuss how they built one of the most powerful AI coding agents, why they focused on non-technical users and what it's like building for a global audience from India. 00:00 - Intro 01:06 - What Is Emergent? 01:18 - Founder Backstory 02:09 - From AI Testing to General Coding Agents 02:52 - Getting Ahead of the Market 04:18 - The Pivot to Non-Technical Users 05:22 - Why Second Movers Can Win in AI 09:04 - Building for Production, Not Just Prototypes 18:21 - Live Demo: Building Apps with Emergent 24:40 - How Emergent Hires and Runs a Lean Team 29:04 - Is SaaS Dead? The Rise of Personalized Software 34:04 - The Future: Niche Apps, Solo Builders and AI Agency
39:32

In this episode of the Lightcone Podcast, we sat down with Mukund Jha and Madhav Jha, the founders of Emergent - an AI platform that lets anyone build and ship production-ready software. In just eight months, users have created more than 7 million apps on Emergent, with the number doubling in just the last 45 days. We discuss how they built one of the most powerful AI coding agents, why they focused on non-technical users and what it's like building for a global audience from India. 00:00 - Intro 01:06 - What Is Emergent? 01:18 - Founder Backstory 02:09 - From AI Testing to General Coding Agents 02:52 - Getting Ahead of the Market 04:18 - The Pivot to Non-Technical Users 05:22 - Why Second Movers Can Win in AI 09:04 - Building for Production, Not Just Prototypes 18:21 - Live Demo: Building Apps with Emergent 24:40 - How Emergent Hires and Runs a Lean Team 29:04 - Is SaaS Dead? The Rise of Personalized Software 34:04 - The Future: Niche Apps, Solo Builders and AI Agency

Y Combinator

107,806 次观看 • 6 个月前

I'm often asked for the best public example of AI evals done right for a real, production product. I finally have an answer. Teresa Torres shares how she shipped an AI interview coach, and used evals to rapidly squash bugs and improve the product. Teresa shows how she: 1. did error analysis FIRST to find real issues (instead of using generic metrics) 😍 2. used Jupyter notebooks to analyze errors 3. built custom annotation tools + custom widgets in notebooks 4. built a LLM-judge and assertions to test for specific errors 5. iterated through this feedback loop until it worked. 6. kept things simple the whole time It's also probably the best commercial for Jupyter notebooks you can imagine. 🥰 Chapter summary below. Link to YT in next thread 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:45 - The Product: Building an AI Interview Coach 00:06:34 - The Problem: How Do I Know if My AI Coach is Any Good? 00:10:15 - Using Airtable for Traces and Annotation 00:12:15 - Discovering Jupyter Notebooks and Designing the First Evals 00:15:15 - Example Evals: LLM-as-Judge vs. Code-Based Assertions 00:21:00 - Learning Python with ChatGPT to Analyze Eval Results 00:31:00 - VS Code, Custom Tools, and an Eval Investigation Notebook 00:39:45 - Building a Custom Annotation Tool with Claude 00:41:00 - From Personal Project to Production App 00:46:02 - How Should PMs and Engineers Collaborate on AI Products? 00:55:45 - Q&A: Capturing Feedback and Annotations from End Users 00:58:11 - Q&A: Is a Technical Background Necessary to Build AI? 01:02:28 - Q&A: What's Next for Teresa? 01:03:13 - Q&A: Unpacking the Micro-Decisions of Building an AI App
1:10:22

I'm often asked for the best public example of AI evals done right for a real, production product. I finally have an answer. Teresa Torres shares how she shipped an AI interview coach, and used evals to rapidly squash bugs and improve the product. Teresa shows how she: 1. did error analysis FIRST to find real issues (instead of using generic metrics) 😍 2. used Jupyter notebooks to analyze errors 3. built custom annotation tools + custom widgets in notebooks 4. built a LLM-judge and assertions to test for specific errors 5. iterated through this feedback loop until it worked. 6. kept things simple the whole time It's also probably the best commercial for Jupyter notebooks you can imagine. 🥰 Chapter summary below. Link to YT in next thread 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:45 - The Product: Building an AI Interview Coach 00:06:34 - The Problem: How Do I Know if My AI Coach is Any Good? 00:10:15 - Using Airtable for Traces and Annotation 00:12:15 - Discovering Jupyter Notebooks and Designing the First Evals 00:15:15 - Example Evals: LLM-as-Judge vs. Code-Based Assertions 00:21:00 - Learning Python with ChatGPT to Analyze Eval Results 00:31:00 - VS Code, Custom Tools, and an Eval Investigation Notebook 00:39:45 - Building a Custom Annotation Tool with Claude 00:41:00 - From Personal Project to Production App 00:46:02 - How Should PMs and Engineers Collaborate on AI Products? 00:55:45 - Q&A: Capturing Feedback and Annotations from End Users 00:58:11 - Q&A: Is a Technical Background Necessary to Build AI? 01:02:28 - Q&A: What's Next for Teresa? 01:03:13 - Q&A: Unpacking the Micro-Decisions of Building an AI App

Hamel Husain

51,376 次观看 • 1 年前

Even when things are going great, running a $1.5 billion AI startup is a knife fight. Granola was one of the first AI apps of this generation to achieve near-ubiquitous adoption. But meeting notes are not the company’s be-all and end-all. The real battle is over owning the interface that everyone uses to get their work done in an AI-native world. I had Chris Pedregal (Chris Pedregal), cofounder and CEO of Granola, back on Every 📧’s AI & I to talk about the current state of the application layer, AI’s frontier, and the future of work. We get into: - Why meeting notes clones don’t matter. Three big companies cloned Granola’s core feature. To him, meeting notes were never the real prize. “Easy come, easy go” is his view of anyone’s lead, including his own. - How he thinks about building proactive features in AI. Granola pre-generates millions of pre-meeting briefs, which include context on the nature of the meeting and people participating, that most people never open. But when they do, they have a magical experience. - Why Granola is betting on “bring your own agent.” Chris says the API and MCP will get “a lot better” over the next few months, and we talk about their agent-native strategy and why they’ve pushed the product that way. This is a must-watch for anyone building at the application layer. Watch the episode! Timestamps Introduction: 00:00:59 Why running a company is a knife fight even when it’s working: 00:01:57 Granola’s counterintuitive view on competition: 00:04:33 Dan’s “pirate and architect” model for early-stage product teams: 00:10:44 Granola’s “shaping” and “validation” phases for building features: 00:13:09 Why Dan lives almost entirely inside Codex: 00:18:17 The case for “Codex-native apps”: 00:24:40 Granola’s “handrail” philosophy: 00:35:37 Why Granola is going all in on winning meeting-adjacent context: 00:38:12 What a transcript alone can never capture: 00:44:19
59:38

Even when things are going great, running a $1.5 billion AI startup is a knife fight. Granola was one of the first AI apps of this generation to achieve near-ubiquitous adoption. But meeting notes are not the company’s be-all and end-all. The real battle is over owning the interface that everyone uses to get their work done in an AI-native world. I had Chris Pedregal (Chris Pedregal), cofounder and CEO of Granola, back on Every 📧’s AI & I to talk about the current state of the application layer, AI’s frontier, and the future of work. We get into: - Why meeting notes clones don’t matter. Three big companies cloned Granola’s core feature. To him, meeting notes were never the real prize. “Easy come, easy go” is his view of anyone’s lead, including his own. - How he thinks about building proactive features in AI. Granola pre-generates millions of pre-meeting briefs, which include context on the nature of the meeting and people participating, that most people never open. But when they do, they have a magical experience. - Why Granola is betting on “bring your own agent.” Chris says the API and MCP will get “a lot better” over the next few months, and we talk about their agent-native strategy and why they’ve pushed the product that way. This is a must-watch for anyone building at the application layer. Watch the episode! Timestamps Introduction: 00:00:59 Why running a company is a knife fight even when it’s working: 00:01:57 Granola’s counterintuitive view on competition: 00:04:33 Dan’s “pirate and architect” model for early-stage product teams: 00:10:44 Granola’s “shaping” and “validation” phases for building features: 00:13:09 Why Dan lives almost entirely inside Codex: 00:18:17 The case for “Codex-native apps”: 00:24:40 Granola’s “handrail” philosophy: 00:35:37 Why Granola is going all in on winning meeting-adjacent context: 00:38:12 What a transcript alone can never capture: 00:44:19

Dan Shipper 📧

13,146 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 BREAKING A new AI app by Every 📧 launches today: Monologue Monologue is a smart voice dictation app for Mac that lets you work 3x faster without breaking flow. It’s already being used by people like Ben Tossell, Nat Eliason, and Julien Chaumond to write over 1 million words a week. Most voice dictation apps flatten your voice. Monologue is different. It understands your vocabulary, your apps, and your style, so nothing gets lost in translation. What you get: - Smart formatting: Text comes out polished and structured for the app you’re in—no cleanup needed. - Personal dictionary: Proper nouns, acronyms, and slang are remembered automatically. - Deep context: With permission, Monologue sees your screen so it knows what you’re referencing. - Multilingual by default: Dictate in 100-plus languages and switch between them effortlessly. - Flexible modes: Use prebuilt workflows (email, docs, notes, code) or design your own. - Local models: Use Monologue without sending your information to the cloud. We want Every 📧 to be the only subscription you need to stay at the edge of AI. That's why Monologue is available now for free for Every 📧 paid subscribers along with Cora, Sparkle, and Spiral—all for just $30 / month. Or you can use Monologue standalone for just $10 / month if you sign up during our early bird period. Try Monologue now →
0:49

🚨 BREAKING A new AI app by Every 📧 launches today: Monologue Monologue is a smart voice dictation app for Mac that lets you work 3x faster without breaking flow. It’s already being used by people like Ben Tossell, Nat Eliason, and Julien Chaumond to write over 1 million words a week. Most voice dictation apps flatten your voice. Monologue is different. It understands your vocabulary, your apps, and your style, so nothing gets lost in translation. What you get: - Smart formatting: Text comes out polished and structured for the app you’re in—no cleanup needed. - Personal dictionary: Proper nouns, acronyms, and slang are remembered automatically. - Deep context: With permission, Monologue sees your screen so it knows what you’re referencing. - Multilingual by default: Dictate in 100-plus languages and switch between them effortlessly. - Flexible modes: Use prebuilt workflows (email, docs, notes, code) or design your own. - Local models: Use Monologue without sending your information to the cloud. We want Every 📧 to be the only subscription you need to stay at the edge of AI. That's why Monologue is available now for free for Every 📧 paid subscribers along with Cora, Sparkle, and Spiral—all for just $30 / month. Or you can use Monologue standalone for just $10 / month if you sign up during our early bird period. Try Monologue now →

Dan Shipper 📧

258,622 次观看 • 1 年前

From a Thai prison cell to a fintech empire processing $1.6B in international payments across 40+ banks and 250M+ users. Jonathan Low (Jonathan Low). Forbes 40 Under 40. Author of "Cell to CEO." We covered prison, banking for AI agents, RWA projects, the future of crypto in banking, vibe coding for trading, and the businesses that win the next 5 years. ⏱ Timestamps: 00:00:00 — Teaser 00:00:46 — Who is Jonathan Low 00:01:35 — What Jonathan's life was like before prison 00:02:13 — How and why Jonathan ended up in prison 00:02:57 — Prison conditions: expectations vs reality 00:07:33 — Prison became the greatest blessing 00:09:12 — How the entrepreneurial journey began after prison 00:10:34 — Why social capital matters 00:11:06 — Launched own club and took it to the top in 3 months 00:12:09 — Built an Axie Infinity gaming guild during COVID 00:13:49 — The beginning of the BipTap Group journey 00:17:23 — How Jonathan built his own banking system 00:20:07 — How to get a crypto card 00:22:03 — How much it costs to launch a white-label solution with BipTap 00:22:58 — Banking for AI agents 00:25:57 — How to build an RWA project 00:27:45 — Future of cryptocurrencies in banking 00:32:08 — The business verticals within Empire Group 00:32:48 — What Jonathan invests his money in 00:33:54 — How relationships with regulators are built 00:34:43 — Implementing AI in business 00:36:28 — Vibe coding in trading 00:40:06 — Advice for first-time founders 00:43:36 — From construction to trading: Ruslan Khairullin's journey 00:44:57 — Inner peace: why calmness is essential for founders 00:50:39 — Work-life balance for entrepreneurs 00:53:47 — $1.5 million in 24 hours on TST coin 00:55:11 — The best way to capture a market 00:55:57 — Banking for nations Watch the full conversation and let me know which part you liked the most 👇
58:52

From a Thai prison cell to a fintech empire processing $1.6B in international payments across 40+ banks and 250M+ users. Jonathan Low (Jonathan Low). Forbes 40 Under 40. Author of "Cell to CEO." We covered prison, banking for AI agents, RWA projects, the future of crypto in banking, vibe coding for trading, and the businesses that win the next 5 years. ⏱ Timestamps: 00:00:00 — Teaser 00:00:46 — Who is Jonathan Low 00:01:35 — What Jonathan's life was like before prison 00:02:13 — How and why Jonathan ended up in prison 00:02:57 — Prison conditions: expectations vs reality 00:07:33 — Prison became the greatest blessing 00:09:12 — How the entrepreneurial journey began after prison 00:10:34 — Why social capital matters 00:11:06 — Launched own club and took it to the top in 3 months 00:12:09 — Built an Axie Infinity gaming guild during COVID 00:13:49 — The beginning of the BipTap Group journey 00:17:23 — How Jonathan built his own banking system 00:20:07 — How to get a crypto card 00:22:03 — How much it costs to launch a white-label solution with BipTap 00:22:58 — Banking for AI agents 00:25:57 — How to build an RWA project 00:27:45 — Future of cryptocurrencies in banking 00:32:08 — The business verticals within Empire Group 00:32:48 — What Jonathan invests his money in 00:33:54 — How relationships with regulators are built 00:34:43 — Implementing AI in business 00:36:28 — Vibe coding in trading 00:40:06 — Advice for first-time founders 00:43:36 — From construction to trading: Ruslan Khairullin's journey 00:44:57 — Inner peace: why calmness is essential for founders 00:50:39 — Work-life balance for entrepreneurs 00:53:47 — $1.5 million in 24 hours on TST coin 00:55:11 — The best way to capture a market 00:55:57 — Banking for nations Watch the full conversation and let me know which part you liked the most 👇

Ruslan Khairullin

16,872 次观看 • 3 个月前

Andrew Wilkinson (Andrew Wilkinson) has been waking up at 4 a.m. because he can’t stop building with Anthropic’s Opus 4.5. He started vibe coding a couple of years ago, but it felt like the Palm Treo era of the smartphone—exciting, but not quite there. You could generate an app, but it would get stuck in bug loops or break the moment you pushed it further. Then he tried Opus 4.5 in Claude Code. It felt, he says, like having a “$100,000-a-month payroll of engineers” working for him 24/7. He’s built practical AI automations into every corner of his work and life, including: - A relationship counselor app called Deep Personality that consolidates 20 clinically validated personality tests into a 40-minute assessment, then generates a 45-page analysis. When both partners complete it, it maps compatibility and predicts conflicts—Wilkinson says it laid out every fight he and his girlfriend have. - A custom email client he built by handing Claude Code his Gmail credentials and describing his ideal workflow. It triages emails by priority and sender, handles quick replies via multiple choice, and walks him through complex emails question by question before drafting. - A personal stylist that texts him four outfit recommendations every morning. It checks the weather, pulls from a spreadsheet of his entire wardrobe (photos converted to CSV by Claude), generates four outfit options rendered as images with Nano Banana 2 Lite, and texts him what to wear down to the watch. - A Lindy agent that acts as an AI referee of sorts—it records his meetings and texts him if it detects psychological red flags like manipulation or gaslighting. The bar is high—he only gets a notification every few months—but when he does, it usually confirms a gut feeling he already had. Andrew is the cofounder of Tiny, the holding company that owns businesses like AeroPress and Dribbble. Earlier in his career, Andrew was a web designer, and he fits one of my predictions for 2026: Designers, who know how to create great experiences for users, are the unsung group most empowered by this AI moment. I had him on Every 📧's AI & I to talk about Opus 4.5, what he’s building with it, and how it’s changing the way he thinks about acquiring software businesses at Tiny. This is a must-watch for anyone who wants to put AI to work in their day-to-day life. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:07 Why Opus 4.5 feels like the iPhone moment for vibe coding: 00:02:48 Why designers have a unique advantage with AI: 00:08:31 How Andrew built a custom email client with Claude Code: 00:14:10 An AI trained on your relationship that predicts your fights: 00:18:13 Using AI meeting notes to make your life better: 00:30:40 Don't inject your opinion into prompts: 00:35:11 Andrew's Claude Code tips and workflows: 00:40:21 Your personal stylist is a prompt away: 00:47:59 How AI is changing the way Andrew invests in software: 00:53:17
1:02:57

Andrew Wilkinson (Andrew Wilkinson) has been waking up at 4 a.m. because he can’t stop building with Anthropic’s Opus 4.5. He started vibe coding a couple of years ago, but it felt like the Palm Treo era of the smartphone—exciting, but not quite there. You could generate an app, but it would get stuck in bug loops or break the moment you pushed it further. Then he tried Opus 4.5 in Claude Code. It felt, he says, like having a “$100,000-a-month payroll of engineers” working for him 24/7. He’s built practical AI automations into every corner of his work and life, including: - A relationship counselor app called Deep Personality that consolidates 20 clinically validated personality tests into a 40-minute assessment, then generates a 45-page analysis. When both partners complete it, it maps compatibility and predicts conflicts—Wilkinson says it laid out every fight he and his girlfriend have. - A custom email client he built by handing Claude Code his Gmail credentials and describing his ideal workflow. It triages emails by priority and sender, handles quick replies via multiple choice, and walks him through complex emails question by question before drafting. - A personal stylist that texts him four outfit recommendations every morning. It checks the weather, pulls from a spreadsheet of his entire wardrobe (photos converted to CSV by Claude), generates four outfit options rendered as images with Nano Banana 2 Lite, and texts him what to wear down to the watch. - A Lindy agent that acts as an AI referee of sorts—it records his meetings and texts him if it detects psychological red flags like manipulation or gaslighting. The bar is high—he only gets a notification every few months—but when he does, it usually confirms a gut feeling he already had. Andrew is the cofounder of Tiny, the holding company that owns businesses like AeroPress and Dribbble. Earlier in his career, Andrew was a web designer, and he fits one of my predictions for 2026: Designers, who know how to create great experiences for users, are the unsung group most empowered by this AI moment. I had him on Every 📧's AI & I to talk about Opus 4.5, what he’s building with it, and how it’s changing the way he thinks about acquiring software businesses at Tiny. This is a must-watch for anyone who wants to put AI to work in their day-to-day life. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:07 Why Opus 4.5 feels like the iPhone moment for vibe coding: 00:02:48 Why designers have a unique advantage with AI: 00:08:31 How Andrew built a custom email client with Claude Code: 00:14:10 An AI trained on your relationship that predicts your fights: 00:18:13 Using AI meeting notes to make your life better: 00:30:40 Don't inject your opinion into prompts: 00:35:11 Andrew's Claude Code tips and workflows: 00:40:21 Your personal stylist is a prompt away: 00:47:59 How AI is changing the way Andrew invests in software: 00:53:17

Dan Shipper

155,179 次观看 • 8 个月前

New session with Shreya Shankar on How to Automate Evals with AI (correctly) The most important part of the eval workflow is finding issues. Shreya does a live demo of how to steer the AI iteratively to find unknown unknowns Chapter summaries: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:55 Why vendors want to automate evals for you 00:01:45 Why no tool can fully automate evals 00:06:00 Mistake #1: Asking AI to just "find the issues" in your data 00:08:11 What good AI-assisted error analysis actually looks like 00:11:12 Live demo: building a review interface from scratch 00:15:10 Annotating traces and building a failure mode taxonomy 00:19:31 Mistake #2: Only reviewing your data once 00:22:53 Mistake #3: Treating all apps with the same accuracy bar 00:25:10 General-purpose agents vs. dedicated eval tools 00:25:48 Summary: three rules for automating evals correctly YT links and more in reply
27:18

New session with Shreya Shankar on How to Automate Evals with AI (correctly) The most important part of the eval workflow is finding issues. Shreya does a live demo of how to steer the AI iteratively to find unknown unknowns Chapter summaries: 00:00:00 Introduction 00:00:55 Why vendors want to automate evals for you 00:01:45 Why no tool can fully automate evals 00:06:00 Mistake #1: Asking AI to just "find the issues" in your data 00:08:11 What good AI-assisted error analysis actually looks like 00:11:12 Live demo: building a review interface from scratch 00:15:10 Annotating traces and building a failure mode taxonomy 00:19:31 Mistake #2: Only reviewing your data once 00:22:53 Mistake #3: Treating all apps with the same accuracy bar 00:25:10 General-purpose agents vs. dedicated eval tools 00:25:48 Summary: three rules for automating evals correctly YT links and more in reply

Hamel Husain

34,299 次观看 • 2 个月前

.Natalia rode so hard for Claude Code we devoted an episode to how she was using it to automate her job running Every 📧’s consulting practice. Fast forward to five months later, and she rides just as hard for Codex. I had her back on AI & I to talk about what caused her to make the switch, including how she ran a prompt in Codex before bed and woke up to a finished, custom CRM tool. We get into: - Why she finds Codex easier to use than Claude Code - How she’s using loops in Codex to create customized tools that work exactly how she needs them to - Why the consulting team still pays for SaaS products like Attio and Asana even though they could vibe code their own versions - How she built an app to manage her father’s medical care in Codex - How knowledge work is evolving from sculpting to gardening, in which you develop the context and logic you need for an agent to execute for you This is a must-watch for anyone trying to figure out whether to build their own tools or buy real software—and what it takes to get an AI agent to run unsupervised for hours and nail the output. Watch below! Timestamps 1. Introduction: 00:01:05 2. How Natalia manages Claudie, the consulting team’s AI project manager: 00:02:35 3. Why the consulting team still pays for SaaS products: 00:04:55 4. Codex as a game changer : 00:11:47 5. Building personalized learning guides and illustrated explainers with AI: 00:14:55 6. Inside Natalia's AI-powered email triage system: 00:21:40 7. The shift from knowledge work as sculpting to knowledge work as gardening: 00:26:44 8. Using Codex to on-shot a custom CRM: 00:28:57 9. Using Codex to build an app that coordinates her father’s medical care: 00:33:16
41:15

.Natalia rode so hard for Claude Code we devoted an episode to how she was using it to automate her job running Every 📧’s consulting practice. Fast forward to five months later, and she rides just as hard for Codex. I had her back on AI & I to talk about what caused her to make the switch, including how she ran a prompt in Codex before bed and woke up to a finished, custom CRM tool. We get into: - Why she finds Codex easier to use than Claude Code - How she’s using loops in Codex to create customized tools that work exactly how she needs them to - Why the consulting team still pays for SaaS products like Attio and Asana even though they could vibe code their own versions - How she built an app to manage her father’s medical care in Codex - How knowledge work is evolving from sculpting to gardening, in which you develop the context and logic you need for an agent to execute for you This is a must-watch for anyone trying to figure out whether to build their own tools or buy real software—and what it takes to get an AI agent to run unsupervised for hours and nail the output. Watch below! Timestamps 1. Introduction: 00:01:05 2. How Natalia manages Claudie, the consulting team’s AI project manager: 00:02:35 3. Why the consulting team still pays for SaaS products: 00:04:55 4. Codex as a game changer : 00:11:47 5. Building personalized learning guides and illustrated explainers with AI: 00:14:55 6. Inside Natalia's AI-powered email triage system: 00:21:40 7. The shift from knowledge work as sculpting to knowledge work as gardening: 00:26:44 8. Using Codex to on-shot a custom CRM: 00:28:57 9. Using Codex to build an app that coordinates her father’s medical care: 00:33:16

Dan Shipper 📧

25,701 次观看 • 2 个月前

I vibe coded a new product on the side while running Every 🪨—and today we're launching it for free. It's called Proof, and it’s a live collaborative document editor where humans and AI agents work together in the same doc. It’s built from the ground up for the kinds of documents agents are increasingly writing: bug reports, PRDs, implementation plans, research briefs, copy audits, strategy docs, memos, and proposals. It's fast, free, and open source—available now at Why Proof? When everyone on your team is working with agents, there's suddenly a ton of AI-generated text flying around—planning docs, strategy memos, session recaps. But the current process for collaborating and iterating on agent-generated writing is…weirdly primitive. It mostly takes place in Markdown files on your laptop, which makes it reminiscent of document editing in 1999. That’s why we built Proof. What makes Proof different? - Proof is agent-native. Anything you can do in Proof, your agent can do just as easily. - Proof tracks provenance: A colored rail on the left side of every document tracks who wrote what. Green means human, Purple means AI. - Proof is login-free and open source: This is because we want Proof to be your agent's favorite document editor. How we use Proof Every 🪨: - Brandon Gell had OpenAI's Codex write a feature plan in Proof, then tagged my personal Claw (R2-C2) in Slack to review it. R2-C2 left feedback, I added comments, Brandon's agent revised the plan, and then Codex executed on it. Brandon submitted a PR to production without writing a line of code. - Austin Tedesco texts his Claw ideas while he's out on a run, then has it maintain a running Proof doc for his weekly food newsletter. He dictates drafts using Naveen Naidu's Monologue, writes into the outline himself, and uses the provenance gutter to track what's his voice vs. the agent's. - Kieran Klaassen uses it as a lightweight scratchpad for his compound engineering workflow. He brainstorms with an agent in the terminal, shares to Proof with one click, then opens the doc to leave comments and tells the agent to go work on them. His take: Proof's job is to communicate about writing and ideas. Proof is free, open source, and requires no login. I built the whole thing by vibe coding between meetings. I sat down with Brandon, Kieran, and Austin on Every 🪨's AI & I to demo it live and talk about how it's changing the way we work. If you're building with agents and need a better way to collaborate on text, this one's for you. Watch below! Timestamps Introduction and the origin story of Proof: 00:02:00 From Mac app to collaborative web editor: 00:07:24 What makes Proof "agent native": 00:09:00 Live demo—watching an agent join and write inside a shared document: 00:14:30 How Austin uses Proof for creative writing and food journalism: 00:20:51 The challenge of multiple agents editing one document simultaneously: 00:24:30 When AI-written docs are better read by agents than by humans: 00:26:48 Brandon's agent-to-agent collaboration loop: 00:29:30 Proof as a lightweight scratchpad versus existing tools like Notion and GitHub: 00:37:09 Why Proof is open source and what that means for builders: 00:42:18
44:37

I vibe coded a new product on the side while running Every 🪨—and today we're launching it for free. It's called Proof, and it’s a live collaborative document editor where humans and AI agents work together in the same doc. It’s built from the ground up for the kinds of documents agents are increasingly writing: bug reports, PRDs, implementation plans, research briefs, copy audits, strategy docs, memos, and proposals. It's fast, free, and open source—available now at Why Proof? When everyone on your team is working with agents, there's suddenly a ton of AI-generated text flying around—planning docs, strategy memos, session recaps. But the current process for collaborating and iterating on agent-generated writing is…weirdly primitive. It mostly takes place in Markdown files on your laptop, which makes it reminiscent of document editing in 1999. That’s why we built Proof. What makes Proof different? - Proof is agent-native. Anything you can do in Proof, your agent can do just as easily. - Proof tracks provenance: A colored rail on the left side of every document tracks who wrote what. Green means human, Purple means AI. - Proof is login-free and open source: This is because we want Proof to be your agent's favorite document editor. How we use Proof Every 🪨: - Brandon Gell had OpenAI's Codex write a feature plan in Proof, then tagged my personal Claw (R2-C2) in Slack to review it. R2-C2 left feedback, I added comments, Brandon's agent revised the plan, and then Codex executed on it. Brandon submitted a PR to production without writing a line of code. - Austin Tedesco texts his Claw ideas while he's out on a run, then has it maintain a running Proof doc for his weekly food newsletter. He dictates drafts using Naveen Naidu's Monologue, writes into the outline himself, and uses the provenance gutter to track what's his voice vs. the agent's. - Kieran Klaassen uses it as a lightweight scratchpad for his compound engineering workflow. He brainstorms with an agent in the terminal, shares to Proof with one click, then opens the doc to leave comments and tells the agent to go work on them. His take: Proof's job is to communicate about writing and ideas. Proof is free, open source, and requires no login. I built the whole thing by vibe coding between meetings. I sat down with Brandon, Kieran, and Austin on Every 🪨's AI & I to demo it live and talk about how it's changing the way we work. If you're building with agents and need a better way to collaborate on text, this one's for you. Watch below! Timestamps Introduction and the origin story of Proof: 00:02:00 From Mac app to collaborative web editor: 00:07:24 What makes Proof "agent native": 00:09:00 Live demo—watching an agent join and write inside a shared document: 00:14:30 How Austin uses Proof for creative writing and food journalism: 00:20:51 The challenge of multiple agents editing one document simultaneously: 00:24:30 When AI-written docs are better read by agents than by humans: 00:26:48 Brandon's agent-to-agent collaboration loop: 00:29:30 Proof as a lightweight scratchpad versus existing tools like Notion and GitHub: 00:37:09 Why Proof is open source and what that means for builders: 00:42:18

Dan Shipper 📧

33,092 次观看 • 6 个月前

Guillermo Rauch (Guillermo Rauch) is one of the most prolific coders of this generation. But he doesn’t think of himself as a coder anymore. Coding, he says, is a specific skill that AI is becoming great at. Instead, he thinks the future of coding is more holistic, full-stack engineers who can ideate, design, and execute all together. Guillermo is the founder and CEO of Vercel (Vercel), the creator of NextJS, and SocketIO. We spent an hour talking about the future of software development in an AI world—and the meta-skills that are essential for the coders of today to master—in order to use tomorrow’s tools to their fullest extent. Here are a few takeaways: - One of the most important keys to his success is taste—and developing taste is all about paying better attention to everything you experience day to day. - He’s great at recognizing bleeding-edge technologies with extremely practical applications but that have bad user experiences. If you can learn to recognize those and build with them, you might build the next NextJs or SocketIO. - Why prototype cultures are becoming common in AI—and the benefits of written cultures like Amazon vs. prototype cultures like Apple for different kinds of companies. - For developers building frameworks, always put the product first; a framework in isolation without a “customer zero” is never going to be a good tool. - The theory of “recursive founder mode”—if you want to build a scalable business, you have to scale yourself by creating an atmosphere that nurtures talent and ambition. - AI tools are shifting software toward consumption-based billing models, making us capital allocators who decide how much compute the AI consumes. - The future of AI is agents with the taste, knowledge, and tools to perform specialized tasks. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:33 How to spot trends early: 00:03:18 Why you should be your own customer: 00:07:34 How to create an ecosystem of talent and ambition: 00:14:55 Why Guillermo doesn't identify as a coder: 00:17:29 AI is gearing us toward an allocation economy: 00:20:50 How Vercel’s copilot compares with other coding agents: 00:28:34 Guillermo’s advice on having better taste: 00:40:35 The future of AI agents is specialized: 00:42:46 How AI startups can compete with big tech: 00:47:50
56:15

Guillermo Rauch (Guillermo Rauch) is one of the most prolific coders of this generation. But he doesn’t think of himself as a coder anymore. Coding, he says, is a specific skill that AI is becoming great at. Instead, he thinks the future of coding is more holistic, full-stack engineers who can ideate, design, and execute all together. Guillermo is the founder and CEO of Vercel (Vercel), the creator of NextJS, and SocketIO. We spent an hour talking about the future of software development in an AI world—and the meta-skills that are essential for the coders of today to master—in order to use tomorrow’s tools to their fullest extent. Here are a few takeaways: - One of the most important keys to his success is taste—and developing taste is all about paying better attention to everything you experience day to day. - He’s great at recognizing bleeding-edge technologies with extremely practical applications but that have bad user experiences. If you can learn to recognize those and build with them, you might build the next NextJs or SocketIO. - Why prototype cultures are becoming common in AI—and the benefits of written cultures like Amazon vs. prototype cultures like Apple for different kinds of companies. - For developers building frameworks, always put the product first; a framework in isolation without a “customer zero” is never going to be a good tool. - The theory of “recursive founder mode”—if you want to build a scalable business, you have to scale yourself by creating an atmosphere that nurtures talent and ambition. - AI tools are shifting software toward consumption-based billing models, making us capital allocators who decide how much compute the AI consumes. - The future of AI is agents with the taste, knowledge, and tools to perform specialized tasks. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:33 How to spot trends early: 00:03:18 Why you should be your own customer: 00:07:34 How to create an ecosystem of talent and ambition: 00:14:55 Why Guillermo doesn't identify as a coder: 00:17:29 AI is gearing us toward an allocation economy: 00:20:50 How Vercel’s copilot compares with other coding agents: 00:28:34 Guillermo’s advice on having better taste: 00:40:35 The future of AI agents is specialized: 00:42:46 How AI startups can compete with big tech: 00:47:50

Dan Shipper

187,107 次观看 • 1 年前

Three months ago, Codex was trash for knowledge work. Now it's my daily driver. I use it for writing, recruiting, deep engineering work, and everything in between. It even keeps me at inbox 0. I chatted with Every 🧱's head of growth Austin Austin Tedesco on Every 🧱's AI & I about what changed, and why he now spends 80% of his working time in the Codex desktop app too. We get into: - How Codex went from making Austin feel like an idiot to being the place he goes to get stuff done, including complex tasks like writing go-to-market plans using existing material from Slack, Notion, and meeting transcripts. - Why the Codex’s desktop app, which is faster and more reliable than Claude Desktop/Cowork, is the real differentiator. - How I source candidates with Codex by having it identify career arcs, not keywords—my go-to move is identifying organizations likely to teach the skills Every needs for a role, and then find candidates from that pool who have since gone on to work in AI. This is a must-watch for anyone who's wondering whether it’s finally time to give Codex a try. Watch below! Timestamps How Codex went from a tool for senior engineers to a daily driver for knowledge work: 00:00:57 How Claude Code proved that a great coding agent works for any knowledge work: 00:02:42 Austin's switch to Codex: 00:07:24 How Austin set up Codex with folders, keys, and reviewer agents: 00:13:48 Using Codex to brainstorm automations across Gmail, Slack, and Notion: 00:18:24 How Austin manages the human review step when Codex is drafting communications: 00:22:42 Using Codex to build specialized agents inspired by product executive Claire Vo: 00:28:54 Synthesizing meeting transcripts and Slack threads into a go-to-market plan: 00:31:09 Building a live KPI tracker in Notion that agents can read: 00:40:15 Using Codex for recruiting: 00:44:54
58:23

Three months ago, Codex was trash for knowledge work. Now it's my daily driver. I use it for writing, recruiting, deep engineering work, and everything in between. It even keeps me at inbox 0. I chatted with Every 🧱's head of growth Austin Austin Tedesco on Every 🧱's AI & I about what changed, and why he now spends 80% of his working time in the Codex desktop app too. We get into: - How Codex went from making Austin feel like an idiot to being the place he goes to get stuff done, including complex tasks like writing go-to-market plans using existing material from Slack, Notion, and meeting transcripts. - Why the Codex’s desktop app, which is faster and more reliable than Claude Desktop/Cowork, is the real differentiator. - How I source candidates with Codex by having it identify career arcs, not keywords—my go-to move is identifying organizations likely to teach the skills Every needs for a role, and then find candidates from that pool who have since gone on to work in AI. This is a must-watch for anyone who's wondering whether it’s finally time to give Codex a try. Watch below! Timestamps How Codex went from a tool for senior engineers to a daily driver for knowledge work: 00:00:57 How Claude Code proved that a great coding agent works for any knowledge work: 00:02:42 Austin's switch to Codex: 00:07:24 How Austin set up Codex with folders, keys, and reviewer agents: 00:13:48 Using Codex to brainstorm automations across Gmail, Slack, and Notion: 00:18:24 How Austin manages the human review step when Codex is drafting communications: 00:22:42 Using Codex to build specialized agents inspired by product executive Claire Vo: 00:28:54 Synthesizing meeting transcripts and Slack threads into a go-to-market plan: 00:31:09 Building a live KPI tracker in Notion that agents can read: 00:40:15 Using Codex for recruiting: 00:44:54

Dan Shipper 📧

55,561 次观看 • 4 个月前

SaaS isn’t dead, it just needs to become agent-native. Linear (Linear) is a great example of how: They pivoted the product to be used by both humans and agents, and that has made them one of the premier software tools in the agent-native era. I had Linear’s cofounder and CEO Karri Saarinen on Every 📧's AI & I to talk about how a product management tool for human software developers became an agent-native tool—and how Linear’s trajectory reveals a bright future for SaaS businesses: - Speed means decisions matter more, not less. AI makes it easy to have an idea and build it without considering whether its existence is justified. When ChatGPT was released, SaaS companies were launching their own chatbots left, right, and center. Instead of jumping on the bandwagon, Linear stopped to consider whether the application was useful. (It wasn’t.) - Just because the technology has changed doesn’t mean your mission should. Karri attributes Linear’s success to never losing sight of what matters: helping teams develop great software. Instead of chasing trends, Linear focused on understanding how AI was impacting its customers’ workflows—and updating its product accordingly. - Agents are now first-class users. Linear never tried to change what it was or did well; it just expanded the user base. Companies can now kick off agents inside Linear, manage them, and track what they're working on alongside the humans on the team, which explains why Codex, Coinbase, and Brex all run their agents on Linear. This is a must watch for anyone interested in how an agent-native SaaS company operates. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction and how Every first discovered Linear: 00:00:39 Why Linear waited to ship AI features instead of rushing to chatbots: 00:02:00 Linear's agent platform and becoming the system that guides AI agents: 00:05:06 Why "SaaS is dead" is a simplistic narrative: 00:07:42 How Linear adopted AI coding tools internally: 00:12:18 AI's impact on product building workflows—speed versus thoughtfulness: 00:17:45 The value of conceptual work and thinking before shipping: 00:22:18 How AI is reshaping Linear's product strategy: 00:29:30 Demo: Linear's agent skills, shared context, and code review workflow: 00:37:18 The future of product development and the enduring role of human judgment: 00:47:48
52:48

SaaS isn’t dead, it just needs to become agent-native. Linear (Linear) is a great example of how: They pivoted the product to be used by both humans and agents, and that has made them one of the premier software tools in the agent-native era. I had Linear’s cofounder and CEO Karri Saarinen on Every 📧's AI & I to talk about how a product management tool for human software developers became an agent-native tool—and how Linear’s trajectory reveals a bright future for SaaS businesses: - Speed means decisions matter more, not less. AI makes it easy to have an idea and build it without considering whether its existence is justified. When ChatGPT was released, SaaS companies were launching their own chatbots left, right, and center. Instead of jumping on the bandwagon, Linear stopped to consider whether the application was useful. (It wasn’t.) - Just because the technology has changed doesn’t mean your mission should. Karri attributes Linear’s success to never losing sight of what matters: helping teams develop great software. Instead of chasing trends, Linear focused on understanding how AI was impacting its customers’ workflows—and updating its product accordingly. - Agents are now first-class users. Linear never tried to change what it was or did well; it just expanded the user base. Companies can now kick off agents inside Linear, manage them, and track what they're working on alongside the humans on the team, which explains why Codex, Coinbase, and Brex all run their agents on Linear. This is a must watch for anyone interested in how an agent-native SaaS company operates. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction and how Every first discovered Linear: 00:00:39 Why Linear waited to ship AI features instead of rushing to chatbots: 00:02:00 Linear's agent platform and becoming the system that guides AI agents: 00:05:06 Why "SaaS is dead" is a simplistic narrative: 00:07:42 How Linear adopted AI coding tools internally: 00:12:18 AI's impact on product building workflows—speed versus thoughtfulness: 00:17:45 The value of conceptual work and thinking before shipping: 00:22:18 How AI is reshaping Linear's product strategy: 00:29:30 Demo: Linear's agent skills, shared context, and code review workflow: 00:37:18 The future of product development and the enduring role of human judgment: 00:47:48

Dan Shipper 📧

36,359 次观看 • 5 个月前

Packy McCormick’s (Packy McCormick) uses AI to find, articulate, and invest behind the next big idea. He writes Not Boring, a newsletter that analyzes technology and startups for 200,000 subscribers every week. He also invests in early stage companies through his fund Not Boring Capital and is an advisor at a16z crypto. I spent an hour with him to understand how he’s baked AI tools into the way he thinks, writes, and invests. We get into: - How he uses AI to understand dense concepts and refine his arguments - His thesis around vertically integrated businesses being the future of tech - How Packy uses Anthropic’s Claude Projects to edit his newsletter - How he makes interactive graphics that represent concepts from his essays - The tools Packy uses to research, write, and edit Not Boring - When he thinks the next crypto bull run will take place We also use Projects to build an AI tool that grades Packy’s essays live on the show This is a must-watch for writers, investors, and anyone trying to understand the cutting edge of technology. Watch below! -- Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:24 Packy’s thesis about the future of technology: 00:02:40 What Packy quick takes on your crypto portfolio: 00:07:42 Use LLMs to validate your understanding of complex concepts: 00:14:31 How Packy used Claude Projects to write an essay he published recently: 00:18:26 Packy’s process to make interactive visual graphics for his essays: 00:24:00 How to use AI to be thorough in your research: 00:31:10 How Packy uses Claude to edit his writing: 00:35:04 The tools Packy uses to create his newsletter: 00:36:44 Using Claude Projects to make a tool that grades Packy’s essays: 00:44:12
1:13:29

Packy McCormick’s (Packy McCormick) uses AI to find, articulate, and invest behind the next big idea. He writes Not Boring, a newsletter that analyzes technology and startups for 200,000 subscribers every week. He also invests in early stage companies through his fund Not Boring Capital and is an advisor at a16z crypto. I spent an hour with him to understand how he’s baked AI tools into the way he thinks, writes, and invests. We get into: - How he uses AI to understand dense concepts and refine his arguments - His thesis around vertically integrated businesses being the future of tech - How Packy uses Anthropic’s Claude Projects to edit his newsletter - How he makes interactive graphics that represent concepts from his essays - The tools Packy uses to research, write, and edit Not Boring - When he thinks the next crypto bull run will take place We also use Projects to build an AI tool that grades Packy’s essays live on the show This is a must-watch for writers, investors, and anyone trying to understand the cutting edge of technology. Watch below! -- Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:24 Packy’s thesis about the future of technology: 00:02:40 What Packy quick takes on your crypto portfolio: 00:07:42 Use LLMs to validate your understanding of complex concepts: 00:14:31 How Packy used Claude Projects to write an essay he published recently: 00:18:26 Packy’s process to make interactive visual graphics for his essays: 00:24:00 How to use AI to be thorough in your research: 00:31:10 How Packy uses Claude to edit his writing: 00:35:04 The tools Packy uses to create his newsletter: 00:36:44 Using Claude Projects to make a tool that grades Packy’s essays: 00:44:12

Dan Shipper 📧

52,701 次观看 • 2 年前

Everyone told Vicente Silveira (Vicente Silveira) that his startup—a GPT wrapper—would fail. Instead, one year later, it’s thriving—with about 500,000 registered users, nearly 3,000 paying subscribers, and over 2 million conversations in the GPT store. Vicente is the cofounder and CEO of AI PDF, a tool that can help you summarize, chat with, and organize your PDF files. When OpenAI allowed users to upload PDFs to @ChatGPTapp, the consensus was that his startup, and all the other GPT wrappers out there, were toast. Some of his competitors even shut shop, but Vicente believed they could still create value for users as a specialized tool. The AI PDF team kept building. A year later, AI PDF is one of the most popular AI-powered PDF readers in the world—and they did it all with a five-person team, and a friends and family round. I sat down with Vicente to understand, in granular detail, the success of AI PDF. We get into: - Why staying small and specialized is a bigger advantage than you think - The power of building with your early adopters - Why lean startups are better positioned than frontier AI companies to create radical solutions - When a growing startup should think about raising venture capital - The emerging role of ‘AI managers’ who will be responsible for overseeing AI agents We even demo an agent integrated into AI PDF, prompting it to analyze recent articles from my column Chain of Thought and write a bulleted list of the core thesis statements. This is a must-watch for small teams building profitable companies at the bleeding edge of AI. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:00:35 AI PDF’s story begins with an email to OpenAI’s Greg Brockman: 00:02:58 Why users choose AI PDF over ChatGPT: 00:05:41 How to compete—and thrive—as a GPT wrapper: 00:06:58 Why building with early adopters is key: 00:20:49 Being small and specialized is your biggest advantage: 00:27:53 When should AI startups raise capital: 00:31:47 The emerging role of humans who will manage AI agents: 00:34:53 Why AI is different from other tech revolutions: 00:45:25 A live demo of an agent integrated into AI PDF: 00:54:01
1:03:24

Everyone told Vicente Silveira (Vicente Silveira) that his startup—a GPT wrapper—would fail. Instead, one year later, it’s thriving—with about 500,000 registered users, nearly 3,000 paying subscribers, and over 2 million conversations in the GPT store. Vicente is the cofounder and CEO of AI PDF, a tool that can help you summarize, chat with, and organize your PDF files. When OpenAI allowed users to upload PDFs to @ChatGPTapp, the consensus was that his startup, and all the other GPT wrappers out there, were toast. Some of his competitors even shut shop, but Vicente believed they could still create value for users as a specialized tool. The AI PDF team kept building. A year later, AI PDF is one of the most popular AI-powered PDF readers in the world—and they did it all with a five-person team, and a friends and family round. I sat down with Vicente to understand, in granular detail, the success of AI PDF. We get into: - Why staying small and specialized is a bigger advantage than you think - The power of building with your early adopters - Why lean startups are better positioned than frontier AI companies to create radical solutions - When a growing startup should think about raising venture capital - The emerging role of ‘AI managers’ who will be responsible for overseeing AI agents We even demo an agent integrated into AI PDF, prompting it to analyze recent articles from my column Chain of Thought and write a bulleted list of the core thesis statements. This is a must-watch for small teams building profitable companies at the bleeding edge of AI. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:00:35 AI PDF’s story begins with an email to OpenAI’s Greg Brockman: 00:02:58 Why users choose AI PDF over ChatGPT: 00:05:41 How to compete—and thrive—as a GPT wrapper: 00:06:58 Why building with early adopters is key: 00:20:49 Being small and specialized is your biggest advantage: 00:27:53 When should AI startups raise capital: 00:31:47 The emerging role of humans who will manage AI agents: 00:34:53 Why AI is different from other tech revolutions: 00:45:25 A live demo of an agent integrated into AI PDF: 00:54:01

Dan Shipper 📧

25,628 次观看 • 1 年前

Let's build a Deepseek Wrapper (Mobile App) without writing a single line of code! Everyone is talking about building web apps with AI, but no one is talking about building mobile apps. This video tutorial and @senior_swc template (built by ) will help you get starting building an app on iOS. This is react native so it's also compatible with Android and Web (But we will cover this in a future video). The point of this video is to get some experience in the simulator and to start building an app. In a video, soon, we will take the app we've built, test it on our phone, and put it on Test-Flight! (Without writing ANY code!) Just a warning: The DeepSeek API has been tough to rely on. So I decided to add Gemini into my app as a backup, which you can do as well (with any AI model) The code for template is on the next tweet. Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 01:35 Setting Up Xcode and iPhone Simulator 02:29 Downloading and Configuring Cursor 04:10 Forking the Template and Initial Setup 06:10 Implementing Authentication with Clerk 08:23 Adding DeepSeek API and Testing 13:35 Enhancing the App with SupaData API 19:00 Using the Serp API to fetch video links 23:00 Figuring things out 27:30 Woohoo!!! Perplexitube Shout out to Galaxies-dev on GitHub, who's repo (chatgpt-clone-react-native), we very helpful in building this template quickly.
28:54

Let's build a Deepseek Wrapper (Mobile App) without writing a single line of code! Everyone is talking about building web apps with AI, but no one is talking about building mobile apps. This video tutorial and @senior_swc template (built by ) will help you get starting building an app on iOS. This is react native so it's also compatible with Android and Web (But we will cover this in a future video). The point of this video is to get some experience in the simulator and to start building an app. In a video, soon, we will take the app we've built, test it on our phone, and put it on Test-Flight! (Without writing ANY code!) Just a warning: The DeepSeek API has been tough to rely on. So I decided to add Gemini into my app as a backup, which you can do as well (with any AI model) The code for template is on the next tweet. Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction 01:35 Setting Up Xcode and iPhone Simulator 02:29 Downloading and Configuring Cursor 04:10 Forking the Template and Initial Setup 06:10 Implementing Authentication with Clerk 08:23 Adding DeepSeek API and Testing 13:35 Enhancing the App with SupaData API 19:00 Using the Serp API to fetch video links 23:00 Figuring things out 27:30 Woohoo!!! Perplexitube Shout out to Galaxies-dev on GitHub, who's repo (chatgpt-clone-react-native), we very helpful in building this template quickly.

Riley Brown

128,580 次观看 • 1 年前

She quit $10K/month, left her 32,000-person community in Korea, and moved to San Francisco to build a startup... "You have to be delusional enough to think it will work, but extremely objective about the data." Cailyn Yong (Cailyn Y.) built Momo in public since day one: every pivot, every burnout, every co-founder breakup, documented for thousands to watch. She wasn't just building a product, she was building trust at scale and turning it into distribution. We sat down at Founders Inc, the place that changed everything for her, to talk about AI memory, building in public, and why the hardest part of founding had nothing to do with the product. Since our convo, Cailyn is now embarking on a new journey. Follow her to see what she's up to next👀 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐒 (00:00) Intro (02:00) Leaving $10K/Month to Go All In on Momo (06:00) Getting Into Founders Inc. (From an ER in Vietnam) (09:30) "Get the F*** Off Localhost" (14:00) The Startup Graveyard: Eddie & CtrlX (17:00) Five Co-Founder Trials & What Trust Means (26:00) What Burnout Really Feels Like (33:00) People Relationships Are the Hardest Part of Founding (40:00) Delusional Enough to Think It'll Work (46:00) Building in Public: Dying Trend or Strongest Moat? (51:00) Three Memory Architecture Experiments (58:00) The OpenClaw Plugin & How Composio Fits In (01:05:00) Going Viral on X & Getting Her First Paying Client (01:11:00) Film School Dreams & The Billion-Dollar Vision This is a Composio "Agents at Work" podcast, where I chat with founders building the next leap of AI. Follow for more :)
1:14:19

She quit $10K/month, left her 32,000-person community in Korea, and moved to San Francisco to build a startup... "You have to be delusional enough to think it will work, but extremely objective about the data." Cailyn Yong (Cailyn Y.) built Momo in public since day one: every pivot, every burnout, every co-founder breakup, documented for thousands to watch. She wasn't just building a product, she was building trust at scale and turning it into distribution. We sat down at Founders Inc, the place that changed everything for her, to talk about AI memory, building in public, and why the hardest part of founding had nothing to do with the product. Since our convo, Cailyn is now embarking on a new journey. Follow her to see what she's up to next👀 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐒 (00:00) Intro (02:00) Leaving $10K/Month to Go All In on Momo (06:00) Getting Into Founders Inc. (From an ER in Vietnam) (09:30) "Get the F*** Off Localhost" (14:00) The Startup Graveyard: Eddie & CtrlX (17:00) Five Co-Founder Trials & What Trust Means (26:00) What Burnout Really Feels Like (33:00) People Relationships Are the Hardest Part of Founding (40:00) Delusional Enough to Think It'll Work (46:00) Building in Public: Dying Trend or Strongest Moat? (51:00) Three Memory Architecture Experiments (58:00) The OpenClaw Plugin & How Composio Fits In (01:05:00) Going Viral on X & Getting Her First Paying Client (01:11:00) Film School Dreams & The Billion-Dollar Vision This is a Composio "Agents at Work" podcast, where I chat with founders building the next leap of AI. Follow for more :)

Julia Fedorin

44,208 次观看 • 2 个月前

Noah Brier (Noah Brier) uses Claude Code as his second brain—it’s the coolest notetaking setup I’ve ever seen. He has Claude running on a server in his basement hooked up to a VPN. It stores, reads, and writes to thousands of notes in his Obsidian (Obsidian) vault. He does it all from his phone. I had him on the show to tell us exactly how he’s pulling this off. We get into: - The nuts and bolts of the Claude Code-Obsidian setup: Noah set up Claude Code on top of his Obsidian root directory, and he walked me through how he uses it to prep for an upcoming speech—creating a project folder, pulling in relevant research from his notes, saving transcripts from chats with other LLMs, and generating daily progress updates. - The “thinking partner” that lives inside Noah’s second brain: Noah points out that in the hype around AI’s ability to write, the fact that it can read is overlooked. That’s why he has an agent inside Claude Code with strict guardrails to stay in “thinking mode.” It logs his questions, tracks insights, and catches him up on research if he returns to a project after a few days away. - How Noah does deep work on his phone: Noah rigged a home server in his basement, put his Obsidian vault in it—and then runs Claude Code on top. Noah says that being able to think, write, research, and ship code from his phone has fundamentally changed the way he works. This episode of Every 📧’s AI & I is a must-watch for anyone curious about who wants to learn how to use Claude Code to build a true second brain. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:19 How you can do deep work on your phone: 00:04:28 Why Noah thinks Grok has the best voice AI: 00:06:14 The nuts and bolts of Noah’s Claude Code-Obsidian setup: 00:11:39 Using an agent in Claude Code as a “thinking partner”: 00:23:59 Noah’s Thomas’ English Muffin theory of AI: 00:35:07 The white space still left to explore in AI: 00:44:04 How Noah is preparing his kids for AI: 00:50:41 How he brought his Claude Code setup to mobile: 01:01:54
1:11:52

Noah Brier (Noah Brier) uses Claude Code as his second brain—it’s the coolest notetaking setup I’ve ever seen. He has Claude running on a server in his basement hooked up to a VPN. It stores, reads, and writes to thousands of notes in his Obsidian (Obsidian) vault. He does it all from his phone. I had him on the show to tell us exactly how he’s pulling this off. We get into: - The nuts and bolts of the Claude Code-Obsidian setup: Noah set up Claude Code on top of his Obsidian root directory, and he walked me through how he uses it to prep for an upcoming speech—creating a project folder, pulling in relevant research from his notes, saving transcripts from chats with other LLMs, and generating daily progress updates. - The “thinking partner” that lives inside Noah’s second brain: Noah points out that in the hype around AI’s ability to write, the fact that it can read is overlooked. That’s why he has an agent inside Claude Code with strict guardrails to stay in “thinking mode.” It logs his questions, tracks insights, and catches him up on research if he returns to a project after a few days away. - How Noah does deep work on his phone: Noah rigged a home server in his basement, put his Obsidian vault in it—and then runs Claude Code on top. Noah says that being able to think, write, research, and ship code from his phone has fundamentally changed the way he works. This episode of Every 📧’s AI & I is a must-watch for anyone curious about who wants to learn how to use Claude Code to build a true second brain. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:19 How you can do deep work on your phone: 00:04:28 Why Noah thinks Grok has the best voice AI: 00:06:14 The nuts and bolts of Noah’s Claude Code-Obsidian setup: 00:11:39 Using an agent in Claude Code as a “thinking partner”: 00:23:59 Noah’s Thomas’ English Muffin theory of AI: 00:35:07 The white space still left to explore in AI: 00:44:04 How Noah is preparing his kids for AI: 00:50:41 How he brought his Claude Code setup to mobile: 01:01:54

Dan Shipper 📧

30,792 次观看 • 1 年前

Claude Code cracked something open for us Every 🧱. Now I ship to codebases I barely know, every feature we ship makes the next one easier, and non-technical members of the team use the terminal. I’m genuinely grateful. So I brought its creators, Cat Wu (cat) and Boris Cherny (Boris Cherny) from Anthropic, on AI & I to say thank you—and to talk about everything they’ve learned from building Claude Code. We get into: • The workflows Anthropic’s smartest engineers use to push Claude Code to its limits. Why they pit subagents against each other to get cleaner results, how they turn past code into leverage, and the slash commands and MCPs they rely on most. • The product lessons behind one of the most loved AI agents in the world. How the team balances simplicity and power—building a tool that anyone can use, but that experts can bend to their will—and their philosophy of “unshipping,” or cutting back whenever there’s a simpler, more intuitive path to user intent. • A peek into the future of coding with AI. The new form factors they’re experimenting with to make Claude Code more autonomous, more reliable, and more accessible to non-technical users This is a must-watch for anyone—both technical and non-technical—who wants to learn how to use Claude Code like the people who built it. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:26 Claude Code’s origin story: 00:02:25 How Anthropic dogfoods Claude Code: 00:07:03 Boris and Cat’s favorite slash commands: 00:14:06 How Boris uses Claude Code to plan feature development: 00:15:49 Everything Anthropic has learned about using sub-agents well: 00:21:53 Use Claude Code to turn past code into leverage: 00:26:16 The product decisions for building an agent that’s simple and powerful: 00:33:14 Making Claude Code accessible to the non-technical user: 00:36:38 The next form factor for coding with AI: 00:45:12
1:10:11

Claude Code cracked something open for us Every 🧱. Now I ship to codebases I barely know, every feature we ship makes the next one easier, and non-technical members of the team use the terminal. I’m genuinely grateful. So I brought its creators, Cat Wu (cat) and Boris Cherny (Boris Cherny) from Anthropic, on AI & I to say thank you—and to talk about everything they’ve learned from building Claude Code. We get into: • The workflows Anthropic’s smartest engineers use to push Claude Code to its limits. Why they pit subagents against each other to get cleaner results, how they turn past code into leverage, and the slash commands and MCPs they rely on most. • The product lessons behind one of the most loved AI agents in the world. How the team balances simplicity and power—building a tool that anyone can use, but that experts can bend to their will—and their philosophy of “unshipping,” or cutting back whenever there’s a simpler, more intuitive path to user intent. • A peek into the future of coding with AI. The new form factors they’re experimenting with to make Claude Code more autonomous, more reliable, and more accessible to non-technical users This is a must-watch for anyone—both technical and non-technical—who wants to learn how to use Claude Code like the people who built it. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:26 Claude Code’s origin story: 00:02:25 How Anthropic dogfoods Claude Code: 00:07:03 Boris and Cat’s favorite slash commands: 00:14:06 How Boris uses Claude Code to plan feature development: 00:15:49 Everything Anthropic has learned about using sub-agents well: 00:21:53 Use Claude Code to turn past code into leverage: 00:26:16 The product decisions for building an agent that’s simple and powerful: 00:33:14 Making Claude Code accessible to the non-technical user: 00:36:38 The next form factor for coding with AI: 00:45:12

Dan Shipper 📧

57,619 次观看 • 11 个月前

OpenAI’s hottest app isn’t ChatGPT—it’s Codex. In the last few weeks alone, the Codex team shipped a desktop app, GPT-5.3 Codex (a new flagship model), and Spark, the fastest coding model I’ve ever used. Usage has grown fivefold since January and over a million people now use Codex weekly. Codex was also the app that OpenAI chose to run an ad for in the Super Bowl. I talked to Thibault (Tibo), head of Codex, and Andrew (Andrew Ambrosino), a member of technical staff who built the Codex app, for Every 📧’s AI & I about what OpenAI is building and how they’re using it internally. We get into: - Why they built a GUI instead of a terminal. Terminals work for quick tasks, they say, but feel limiting when you’re running multiple agents in parallel. The IDE, meanwhile, overwhelms users—and the Codex team wants the AI to dynamically decide which tools to show you for a given task. - How they’re teaching the model to read between the lines. Codex is great at following instructions, but optimize too hard in that direction, and it starts taking you literally—like copying a typo directly into the code. The team obsesses over this tradeoff, and is also introducing “personalities,” modes users can toggle between that control how blunt or supportive the model feels. - How OpenAI uses its own coding agent. Codex lets you schedule prompts to run on a recurring basis, and the team has dozens of automations running at all times. For example, one scans for merge conflicts every couple of hours so code is always ready to ship, and another picks a random file from the codebase multiple times a day and hunts for bugs no one would've gone looking for. - Why speed is a dimension of intelligence. OpenAI’s newest model (Spark) is so fast that they actually slow it down so you can read the output. They see the speed enabling three things: staying super in the flow, replacing brittle developer tools with intelligent ones that can adapt on the fly, and redirecting the model mid-task— especially with voice—so coding starts to feel more and more like a conversation. - Code review is the next bottleneck. Models can generate code faster than ever, but someone still has to verify that it works. The team is exploring a future where the model proves its own fix works—retracing the click path a user would take, screenshotting the results, and attaching the evidence to a pull request. This is a must-watch for anyone who uses AI coding agents—and is curious about the future of programming. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:27 OpenAI’s evolving bet on its coding agent: 00:05:27 The choice to invest in a GUI (over a terminal): 00:09:42 The AI workflows that the Codex team relies on to ship: 00:20:38 Teaching Codex how to read between the lines: 00:26:45 Building affordances for a lightening fast model: 00:28:45 Why speed is a dimension of intelligence: 00:33:15 Code review is the next bottleneck for coding agents: 00:36:30 How the Codex team positions against the competition: 00:41:24
46:40

OpenAI’s hottest app isn’t ChatGPT—it’s Codex. In the last few weeks alone, the Codex team shipped a desktop app, GPT-5.3 Codex (a new flagship model), and Spark, the fastest coding model I’ve ever used. Usage has grown fivefold since January and over a million people now use Codex weekly. Codex was also the app that OpenAI chose to run an ad for in the Super Bowl. I talked to Thibault (Tibo), head of Codex, and Andrew (Andrew Ambrosino), a member of technical staff who built the Codex app, for Every 📧’s AI & I about what OpenAI is building and how they’re using it internally. We get into: - Why they built a GUI instead of a terminal. Terminals work for quick tasks, they say, but feel limiting when you’re running multiple agents in parallel. The IDE, meanwhile, overwhelms users—and the Codex team wants the AI to dynamically decide which tools to show you for a given task. - How they’re teaching the model to read between the lines. Codex is great at following instructions, but optimize too hard in that direction, and it starts taking you literally—like copying a typo directly into the code. The team obsesses over this tradeoff, and is also introducing “personalities,” modes users can toggle between that control how blunt or supportive the model feels. - How OpenAI uses its own coding agent. Codex lets you schedule prompts to run on a recurring basis, and the team has dozens of automations running at all times. For example, one scans for merge conflicts every couple of hours so code is always ready to ship, and another picks a random file from the codebase multiple times a day and hunts for bugs no one would've gone looking for. - Why speed is a dimension of intelligence. OpenAI’s newest model (Spark) is so fast that they actually slow it down so you can read the output. They see the speed enabling three things: staying super in the flow, replacing brittle developer tools with intelligent ones that can adapt on the fly, and redirecting the model mid-task— especially with voice—so coding starts to feel more and more like a conversation. - Code review is the next bottleneck. Models can generate code faster than ever, but someone still has to verify that it works. The team is exploring a future where the model proves its own fix works—retracing the click path a user would take, screenshotting the results, and attaching the evidence to a pull request. This is a must-watch for anyone who uses AI coding agents—and is curious about the future of programming. Watch below! Timestamps: Introduction: 00:01:27 OpenAI’s evolving bet on its coding agent: 00:05:27 The choice to invest in a GUI (over a terminal): 00:09:42 The AI workflows that the Codex team relies on to ship: 00:20:38 Teaching Codex how to read between the lines: 00:26:45 Building affordances for a lightening fast model: 00:28:45 Why speed is a dimension of intelligence: 00:33:15 Code review is the next bottleneck for coding agents: 00:36:30 How the Codex team positions against the competition: 00:41:24

Dan Shipper 📧

15,588 次观看 • 7 个月前