Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Need more nature in design! Built with Three.js // GSAP // GPT 5.6 Sol. Will post live link tomorrow.

Zsolt Kacso

4,077 subscribers

69,363 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Arts Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

37 Comments

—s2 months ago

So you found this tweet from 2024 and told an AI do this but with other leaves? Impressive

Md Mafizuddin2 months ago

waiting for the link 🙌🏻

Putri Karunia2 months ago

nicee!! 🔥

Zsolt Kacso2 months ago

thank you!

JONNA2 months ago

had to work real hard to get the organic feel right in my netti.

Adam Fard2 months ago

the true definition of cool things 😮

MixRoute AI2 months ago

Super smooth animations! 🔥

R2 months ago

Wow

Maxwell Allen Blessen2 months ago

Don’t be shy, post a walkthrough of how you did it

Zsolt Kacso2 months ago

I would but it's just lots of yelling to gpt 5.6

Zach2 months ago

Looks sick! Followed. May the algo gods show me your post 🤞

David Stephen2 months ago

My feed is blessing me thank you @nikitabier

Vipin Pathak2 months ago

seeeeesshh good one 🤘🏼

Three.js2 months ago

❤️❤️❤️

Gustav ❖2 months ago

Love this

Aakashdeep S. B.2 months ago

This is awesome...! I will try to replicate the same effect manually...🎉

Nayloroad Creatives2 months ago

Vicious

Jóhannes Eiríksson2 months ago

Nicely done, looking forward to explore it.

Jazzbox2 months ago

Verrry nice 🤩✨

Gabe | Designer2 months ago

Amazing!!!

Three.js Resources2 months ago

Nem Rossz 😉

Zsolt Kacso2 months ago

Hah koszi!

Jason2 months ago

wow this is so good

₿ lockTent🎩 80 IQ Pleb2 months ago

Neat

COURT2 months ago

Did you post a link?

TIMI.2 months ago

So cool tho

Jake Moran2 months ago

so good

Occam’s Orange2 months ago

Also tell us how 👌

ray2 months ago

Awsome

Kien Hoang2 months ago

amazing effect ! what prompt do you make this ?

StatysTheBaddest2 months ago

I like the shadows and yes, that's inspiring! Nature!

Jimmy Horan2 months ago

very sick

Hauke 🌱🦀2 months ago

Wow, really amazing effect!

Romeo Shoots2 months ago

I second this

Rinoy R K2 months ago

Beautiful

Mergestorm2 months ago

How is it on mobile, that’s the real test. But looks absolutely stunning from the preview.

5sdesign2 months ago

The pacing sells it. "The canopy has made space for you" landing after the scroll settles is copywriting doing motion's job. What drove the transitions, GSAP timelines or scroll-linked?

Related Videos

This is genuinely mind-blowing. This guy literally built a fully interactive 3D human anatomy app with Three.js using GPT-5.6 Sol 🤯 100% free and open-source. demo + repo in 🧵↓

This is genuinely mind-blowing. This guy literally built a fully interactive 3D human anatomy app with Three.js using GPT-5.6 Sol 🤯 100% free and open-source. demo + repo in 🧵↓

Charly Wargnier

12,953 views • 1 month ago

three.js is way more fun outside of the computer screen. Built w/ sol 5.6, world labs and webar

three.js is way more fun outside of the computer screen. Built w/ sol 5.6, world labs and webar

Ian Curtis

88,725 views • 2 months ago

A soda-cans scroll animation using three.js with scroll animation. Completely built with Codex GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra in ~20mins. The textures are being generated by imagegen skill. Not polished version. This is crazy af Demo: Source:

A soda-cans scroll animation using three.js with scroll animation. Completely built with Codex GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra in ~20mins. The textures are being generated by imagegen skill. Not polished version. This is crazy af Demo: Source:

fatih kadir akın

12,988 views • 1 month ago

Made a game character selection screen with GPT-5.6 Sol Started with a few character images generated with GPT Image 2 Then asked GPT-5.6 to design a polished game character screen around them Here's what it came up with

Made a game character selection screen with GPT-5.6 Sol Started with a few character images generated with GPT Image 2 Then asked GPT-5.6 to design a polished game character screen around them Here's what it came up with

Dilum Sanjaya

108,368 views • 2 months ago

$I gave this video to gpt 5.6 Sol, asked it create a diffraction grating shader in Three.js. It took quite a few rounds but here it is$

I gave this video to gpt 5.6 Sol, asked it create a diffraction grating shader in Three.js. It took quite a few rounds but here it is

Scott

297,699 views • 1 month ago

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Command Code

377,252 views • 2 months ago

Tested FlappyBench with GLM 5.3, Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol 3 models. Same prompt with /design command. Scored on features, UX/UI, and cost. 🔹 Fable 5 → 9.5/10 · $0.420 🔹 GLM 5.3 → 9/10 · $0.018 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 Results: → Fable 5 wins on quality, but costs 23x more than GLM 5.3 → GLM 5.3 gives better output than GPT 5.6 Sol at 8x cheaper → Optimizing for cost? Go for GLM 5.3. Otherwise, Fable 5 if quality matters

Tested FlappyBench with GLM 5.3, Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol 3 models. Same prompt with /design command. Scored on features, UX/UI, and cost. 🔹 Fable 5 → 9.5/10 · $0.420 🔹 GLM 5.3 → 9/10 · $0.018 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 Results: → Fable 5 wins on quality, but costs 23x more than GLM 5.3 → GLM 5.3 gives better output than GPT 5.6 Sol at 8x cheaper → Optimizing for cost? Go for GLM 5.3. Otherwise, Fable 5 if quality matters

Command Code

22,840 views • 1 month ago

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Built a car racing game with a UX-over-UI focus, using /design command. Parameters we reviewed: Car speed, crash behavior, scoring, smoothness, and feel. Results: Grok 4.5: best overall performance Fable 5: a close second, nearly matching Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol: great UI, weak gameplay (excess drift and friction) Ranking (based on actual gameplay): - Grok 4.5: 9/10 - Fable 5: 8/10 - GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 (UI was 10/10, gameplay wasn't)

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Built a car racing game with a UX-over-UI focus, using /design command. Parameters we reviewed: Car speed, crash behavior, scoring, smoothness, and feel. Results: Grok 4.5: best overall performance Fable 5: a close second, nearly matching Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol: great UI, weak gameplay (excess drift and friction) Ranking (based on actual gameplay): - Grok 4.5: 9/10 - Fable 5: 8/10 - GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 (UI was 10/10, gameplay wasn't)

Command Code

79,680 views • 2 months ago

I tap out, I'm switching my daily driver to Low in GPT-6 Astra. - Similar performance as GPT 5.6 Sol max - Lower cost than GPT 5.6 Sol max - Iterate faster than GPT 5.6 Sol max - low thinking produces result faster (don't need 2x speed anymore) Very underrated imo. You get to iterate faster, for cheaper, at similar performance of SOTA from a week ago. 00:00 Intelligence vs Cost graph 02:24 Astra Light vs GPT-5.6 Sol max 03:34 Faster iteration 05:07 Speed

I tap out, I'm switching my daily driver to Low in GPT-6 Astra. - Similar performance as GPT 5.6 Sol max - Lower cost than GPT 5.6 Sol max - Iterate faster than GPT 5.6 Sol max - low thinking produces result faster (don't need 2x speed anymore) Very underrated imo. You get to iterate faster, for cheaper, at similar performance of SOTA from a week ago. 00:00 Intelligence vs Cost graph 02:24 Astra Light vs GPT-5.6 Sol max 03:34 Faster iteration 05:07 Speed

Wesley

76,364 views • 9 days ago

We ran a test between Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, and Kimi K3. One prompt. Across all three models. With our /design command. Results: We reviewed gameplay, UX, and UI 🔹 Opus 5 is strong UI + motion, best gameplay 🔹 Kimi K3 has solid design and gameplay 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol has best UI, worse gameplay Ranking (DX, features, and cost): 🔹 Opus 5: 10/10 · $0.25 🔹 Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.12 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.32

We ran a test between Opus 5, GPT-5.6 Sol, and Kimi K3. One prompt. Across all three models. With our /design command. Results: We reviewed gameplay, UX, and UI 🔹 Opus 5 is strong UI + motion, best gameplay 🔹 Kimi K3 has solid design and gameplay 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol has best UI, worse gameplay Ranking (DX, features, and cost): 🔹 Opus 5: 10/10 · $0.25 🔹 Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.12 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.32

Command Code

24,686 views • 1 month ago

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Ahmad Awais

255,237 views • 2 months ago

Prompted xAI's Grok 4 with the code from my quoted post and built this interactive 3D particle system with Three.js, GSAP, and WebGL. Features include shape morphing, bloom effects, and fluid animations.

Prompted xAI's Grok 4 with the code from my quoted post and built this interactive 3D particle system with Three.js, GSAP, and WebGL. Features include shape morphing, bloom effects, and fluid animations.

Techartist

107,173 views • 1 year ago

We ran a test between the new Qwen3.8-Max, Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. 3 models. same prompt. one-shot with the /design command. Reviewed gameplay features, UX/UI and cost. 🔹 Qwen3.8-Max → 9/10 · $0.0248 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 🔹 Opus 5 → 8.5/10 · $0.253 Qwen3.8-Max is approximately 4.2× cheaper than GPT-5.6, Sol, Opus 5 and has the same level of UI, UX, and gameplay.

We ran a test between the new Qwen3.8-Max, Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. 3 models. same prompt. one-shot with the /design command. Reviewed gameplay features, UX/UI and cost. 🔹 Qwen3.8-Max → 9/10 · $0.0248 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 🔹 Opus 5 → 8.5/10 · $0.253 Qwen3.8-Max is approximately 4.2× cheaper than GPT-5.6, Sol, Opus 5 and has the same level of UI, UX, and gameplay.

Command Code

179,535 views • 1 month ago

Kimi K3 just 3 shotted a whole walkable voxel town with drivable cars — Voxelville, around $3.24 in API usage. The same token cost would be $10.80 with Fable 5 and $6 with GPT 5.6 Sol. Fable 5 built its own Maplewood, GPT 5.6 Sol built Willowwick, but on price/quality Kimi K3 just cooked both of them. The era of free indie game development is closer than you think!

Kimi K3 just 3 shotted a whole walkable voxel town with drivable cars — Voxelville, around $3.24 in API usage. The same token cost would be $10.80 with Fable 5 and $6 with GPT 5.6 Sol. Fable 5 built its own Maplewood, GPT 5.6 Sol built Willowwick, but on price/quality Kimi K3 just cooked both of them. The era of free indie game development is closer than you think!

Kirill

65,087 views • 2 months ago

i just showed gpt 5.6 sol an object from 4 different views and it just created 3D version of it with Three.js and it also created the video explaning it using HyperFrames

i just showed gpt 5.6 sol an object from 4 different views and it just created 3D version of it with Three.js and it also created the video explaning it using HyperFrames

gokaygokay

17,706 views • 2 months ago

Previewing Ultrafast mode for OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol, powered by Cerebras. GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast generates responses at up to 750 tokens per second. That's the full, GPT-5.6-Sol model -- up to 14× faster than the same model on Standard processing. It speedran Humanity’s Last Exam in 11h 11m, nearly 7× faster than Claude Fable 5 with comparable accuracy.

Previewing Ultrafast mode for OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol, powered by Cerebras. GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast generates responses at up to 750 tokens per second. That's the full, GPT-5.6-Sol model -- up to 14× faster than the same model on Standard processing. It speedran Humanity’s Last Exam in 11h 11m, nearly 7× faster than Claude Fable 5 with comparable accuracy.

Cerebras

1,288,694 views • 1 month ago

Use Grok to dispatch tasks to GPT-5.6-Sol. Grok is fast and smart, so it's great at breaking work into chunks and dispatching them. Then let GPT-5.6-Sol Xhigh handle the deep thinking. Once it's done, have everything report back to Grok for summarization and the final answer. All with the built-in Orchestration in Orca ADE.

Use Grok to dispatch tasks to GPT-5.6-Sol. Grok is fast and smart, so it's great at breaking work into chunks and dispatching them. Then let GPT-5.6-Sol Xhigh handle the deep thinking. Once it's done, have everything report back to Grok for summarization and the final answer. All with the built-in Orchestration in Orca ADE.

jinjingliang

27,983 views • 2 months ago

After a lot of tests: NO, Luna is nice ON THE benchmark but an absolute shit in terms of design experience Looks like GPT 5.5 basically And at the end, Luna xhigh is MORE expensive than GPT 5.6 Sol medium So, completely useless model

After a lot of tests: NO, Luna is nice ON THE benchmark but an absolute shit in terms of design experience Looks like GPT 5.5 basically And at the end, Luna xhigh is MORE expensive than GPT 5.6 Sol medium So, completely useless model

Melvyn • Builder

79,048 views • 2 months ago

i was reading through Modal's glossary to better understand how GPUs work. but what better way to learn than a visualization? so I had gpt 5.6 sol build an H100 in three.js based off the glossary. play around with it at

i was reading through Modal's glossary to better understand how GPUs work. but what better way to learn than a visualization? so I had gpt 5.6 sol build an H100 in three.js based off the glossary. play around with it at

Kyle Jeong

38,039 views • 1 month ago

Shopify stores with GPT-5.6 Sol 🤯 5.6 Sol lets you copy proven sections from the world's biggest Shopify brands and add them to your theme in seconds Drop a GIF in the comments, and I'll send you one of the highest-converting sections generated by Sol You need to follow me first so I can message you

Shopify stores with GPT-5.6 Sol 🤯 5.6 Sol lets you copy proven sections from the world's biggest Shopify brands and add them to your theme in seconds Drop a GIF in the comments, and I'll send you one of the highest-converting sections generated by Sol You need to follow me first so I can message you

Jimmy

24,229 views • 1 month ago