Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Need more nature in design! Built with Three.js // GSAP // GPT 5.6 Sol. Will post live link tomorrow.

Zsolt Kacso

3,515 subscribers

67,237 views • 20 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Arts Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

three.js is way more fun outside of the computer screen. Built w/ sol 5.6, world labs and webar

three.js is way more fun outside of the computer screen. Built w/ sol 5.6, world labs and webar

Ian Curtis

88,469 views • 21 days ago

Made a game character selection screen with GPT-5.6 Sol Started with a few character images generated with GPT Image 2 Then asked GPT-5.6 to design a polished game character screen around them Here's what it came up with

Made a game character selection screen with GPT-5.6 Sol Started with a few character images generated with GPT Image 2 Then asked GPT-5.6 to design a polished game character screen around them Here's what it came up with

Dilum Sanjaya

105,646 views • 17 days ago

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Command Code

375,786 views • 19 days ago

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Built a car racing game with a UX-over-UI focus, using /design command. Parameters we reviewed: Car speed, crash behavior, scoring, smoothness, and feel. Results: Grok 4.5: best overall performance Fable 5: a close second, nearly matching Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol: great UI, weak gameplay (excess drift and friction) Ranking (based on actual gameplay): - Grok 4.5: 9/10 - Fable 5: 8/10 - GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 (UI was 10/10, gameplay wasn't)

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Built a car racing game with a UX-over-UI focus, using /design command. Parameters we reviewed: Car speed, crash behavior, scoring, smoothness, and feel. Results: Grok 4.5: best overall performance Fable 5: a close second, nearly matching Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol: great UI, weak gameplay (excess drift and friction) Ranking (based on actual gameplay): - Grok 4.5: 9/10 - Fable 5: 8/10 - GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 (UI was 10/10, gameplay wasn't)

Command Code

78,770 views • 25 days ago

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Ahmad Awais

255,093 views • 19 days ago

We ran a test between the new Qwen3.8-Max, Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. 3 models. same prompt. one-shot with the /design command. Reviewed gameplay features, UX/UI and cost. 🔹 Qwen3.8-Max → 9/10 · $0.0248 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 🔹 Opus 5 → 8.5/10 · $0.253 Qwen3.8-Max is approximately 4.2× cheaper than GPT-5.6, Sol, Opus 5 and has the same level of UI, UX, and gameplay.

We ran a test between the new Qwen3.8-Max, Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. 3 models. same prompt. one-shot with the /design command. Reviewed gameplay features, UX/UI and cost. 🔹 Qwen3.8-Max → 9/10 · $0.0248 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 🔹 Opus 5 → 8.5/10 · $0.253 Qwen3.8-Max is approximately 4.2× cheaper than GPT-5.6, Sol, Opus 5 and has the same level of UI, UX, and gameplay.

Command Code

153,657 views • 1 day ago

i just showed gpt 5.6 sol an object from 4 different views and it just created 3D version of it with Three.js and it also created the video explaning it using HyperFrames

i just showed gpt 5.6 sol an object from 4 different views and it just created 3D version of it with Three.js and it also created the video explaning it using HyperFrames

gokaygokay

17,459 views • 21 days ago

Kimi K3 just 3 shotted a whole walkable voxel town with drivable cars — Voxelville, around $3.24 in API usage. The same token cost would be $10.80 with Fable 5 and $6 with GPT 5.6 Sol. Fable 5 built its own Maplewood, GPT 5.6 Sol built Willowwick, but on price/quality Kimi K3 just cooked both of them. The era of free indie game development is closer than you think!

Kimi K3 just 3 shotted a whole walkable voxel town with drivable cars — Voxelville, around $3.24 in API usage. The same token cost would be $10.80 with Fable 5 and $6 with GPT 5.6 Sol. Fable 5 built its own Maplewood, GPT 5.6 Sol built Willowwick, but on price/quality Kimi K3 just cooked both of them. The era of free indie game development is closer than you think!

Kirill

63,180 views • 16 days ago

Prompted xAI's Grok 4 with the code from my quoted post and built this interactive 3D particle system with Three.js, GSAP, and WebGL. Features include shape morphing, bloom effects, and fluid animations.

Prompted xAI's Grok 4 with the code from my quoted post and built this interactive 3D particle system with Three.js, GSAP, and WebGL. Features include shape morphing, bloom effects, and fluid animations.

Techartist

106,082 views • 1 year ago

Use Grok to dispatch tasks to GPT-5.6-Sol. Grok is fast and smart, so it's great at breaking work into chunks and dispatching them. Then let GPT-5.6-Sol Xhigh handle the deep thinking. Once it's done, have everything report back to Grok for summarization and the final answer. All with the built-in Orchestration in Orca ADE.

Use Grok to dispatch tasks to GPT-5.6-Sol. Grok is fast and smart, so it's great at breaking work into chunks and dispatching them. Then let GPT-5.6-Sol Xhigh handle the deep thinking. Once it's done, have everything report back to Grok for summarization and the final answer. All with the built-in Orchestration in Orca ADE.

jinjingliang

27,983 views • 26 days ago

After a lot of tests: NO, Luna is nice ON THE benchmark but an absolute shit in terms of design experience Looks like GPT 5.5 basically And at the end, Luna xhigh is MORE expensive than GPT 5.6 Sol medium So, completely useless model

After a lot of tests: NO, Luna is nice ON THE benchmark but an absolute shit in terms of design experience Looks like GPT 5.5 basically And at the end, Luna xhigh is MORE expensive than GPT 5.6 Sol medium So, completely useless model

Melvyn • Builder

79,048 views • 23 days ago

Shopify stores with GPT-5.6 Sol 🤯 5.6 Sol lets you copy proven sections from the world's biggest Shopify brands and add them to your theme in seconds Drop a GIF in the comments, and I'll send you one of the highest-converting sections generated by Sol You need to follow me first so I can message you

Shopify stores with GPT-5.6 Sol 🤯 5.6 Sol lets you copy proven sections from the world's biggest Shopify brands and add them to your theme in seconds Drop a GIF in the comments, and I'll send you one of the highest-converting sections generated by Sol You need to follow me first so I can message you

Jimmy

22,897 views • 4 days ago

Testing sol 5.6 tonight. Built this using 8thWall webAR + sparkjs (open source) with a world labs gaussian splat generation of new interior design of my living room

Testing sol 5.6 tonight. Built this using 8thWall webAR + sparkjs (open source) with a world labs gaussian splat generation of new interior design of my living room

Ian Curtis

106,612 views • 22 days ago

⚡️OPENAI: GPT-5.6 SOL IS 54% MORE TOKEN EFFICIENT ON AGENTIC CODING Sam Altman says the new GPT-5.6 Sol model is 54% more token efficient on agentic coding tasks and is “as good or better” than competing models. He also said OpenAI aims to offer better value with “every enterprise now is thinking about spend and the value they’re getting in exchange for AI.”

⚡️OPENAI: GPT-5.6 SOL IS 54% MORE TOKEN EFFICIENT ON AGENTIC CODING Sam Altman says the new GPT-5.6 Sol model is 54% more token efficient on agentic coding tasks and is “as good or better” than competing models. He also said OpenAI aims to offer better value with “every enterprise now is thinking about spend and the value they’re getting in exchange for AI.”

Coin Bureau

33,775 views • 26 days ago

wow... GPT 5.6 Sol Passed the Replit Benchmark. In one prompt 5.6 on Codex created a full Replit clone with DB, Sandboxes, and an agent that builds and edits full web apps. Only Fable and GPT 5.6 have passed this benchmark. 5.6 is much better at designing iOS apps than 5.5 as well.

wow... GPT 5.6 Sol Passed the Replit Benchmark. In one prompt 5.6 on Codex created a full Replit clone with DB, Sandboxes, and an agent that builds and edits full web apps. Only Fable and GPT 5.6 have passed this benchmark. 5.6 is much better at designing iOS apps than 5.5 as well.

Riley Brown

123,242 views • 27 days ago

after 2 years, i finally decided to update my personal website 🤣 been procrastinatin, no more! in an age spoiled with gpt 5.6 sol and fable. built using Next.js 16.3 w/ instant navigation + ppr, open sourced too see if you can spot some easter eggs ;)

after 2 years, i finally decided to update my personal website 🤣 been procrastinatin, no more! in an age spoiled with gpt 5.6 sol and fable. built using Next.js 16.3 w/ instant navigation + ppr, open sourced too see if you can spot some easter eggs ;)

Cali Castle

46,533 views • 15 days ago

I tested my Blender character creation skill with Codex + GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra. The full prompt: “Create a Three.js game where the player explores different biomes. Create the character and animations with skill-blender-character.” Codex built the world, created the low-poly character in Blender, generated the outfit and integrated the animations into the game. One prompt, one custom skill, one playable prototype.

I tested my Blender character creation skill with Codex + GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra. The full prompt: “Create a Three.js game where the player explores different biomes. Create the character and animations with skill-blender-character.” Codex built the world, created the low-poly character in Blender, generated the outfit and integrated the animations into the game. One prompt, one custom skill, one playable prototype.

Givros

10,599 views • 21 days ago

GPT 5.6 Pro continues to mogs Fable in 3d test working on games one shot too , for comment check quote post and also share your prompts and fable output i will tag you with 5.6 pro results credit : Mirochill

GPT 5.6 Pro continues to mogs Fable in 3d test working on games one shot too , for comment check quote post and also share your prompts and fable output i will tag you with 5.6 pro results credit : Mirochill

Chetaslua

201,170 views • 1 month ago

Qwen 3.8 will be benchmaxxed slop second to fable 5 is such a hype statement , its not even close to kimi k3 and GPT-5.6 sol you can test it yourself on the qwen chat website currently available > token hungry > not that good as advertised , will test more The best part of kimi was that in blog they themselves wrote its not comparable to fable 5 and sol 5.6 in bunch of user experience stuff We need more truth like this in our industry , other than that i will run my vision test

Qwen 3.8 will be benchmaxxed slop second to fable 5 is such a hype statement , its not even close to kimi k3 and GPT-5.6 sol you can test it yourself on the qwen chat website currently available > token hungry > not that good as advertised , will test more The best part of kimi was that in blog they themselves wrote its not comparable to fable 5 and sol 5.6 in bunch of user experience stuff We need more truth like this in our industry , other than that i will run my vision test

Chetaslua

126,810 views • 17 days ago

Introducing autoresearch with GPT 5.6 We had GPT 5.6 Sol reproduce the key findings from “Towards Mechanistically Understanding Why Memorized Knowledge Fails to Generalize in LLM Finetuning” Compared to GPT-5.5 and even Fable 5, GPT-5.6 stayed more focused on a few, critical experiments and spent less time on peripheral details. It also asked fewer “clarification” questions and independently resolved ambiguities instead of pushing them back to us OpenAI pushing the boundaries of the automated research loop with models that don’t have handcuffs

Introducing autoresearch with GPT 5.6 We had GPT 5.6 Sol reproduce the key findings from “Towards Mechanistically Understanding Why Memorized Knowledge Fails to Generalize in LLM Finetuning” Compared to GPT-5.5 and even Fable 5, GPT-5.6 stayed more focused on a few, critical experiments and spent less time on peripheral details. It also asked fewer “clarification” questions and independently resolved ambiguities instead of pushing them back to us OpenAI pushing the boundaries of the automated research loop with models that don’t have handcuffs

alphaXiv

85,197 views • 22 days ago