Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Nepotism, Transparency, Accountability: Tehseen Poonawalla Raises Red Flags Over Women’s Quota Bill Political analyst Tehseen Poonawalla Official 🇮🇳 criticizes the proposed amendments to the Women's Reservation Bill, calling them a “distraction” rather than genuine reform. While supporting women’s reservation in principle, he questions the lack of transparency, arguing the... draft should be made public for debate and scrutiny. He warns that without safeguards, the bill may primarily benefit relatives of politicians, such as wives and daughters, rather than ordinary women. Drawing from local governance examples, he claims political families often dominate reserved seats. He also raises concerns about parliamentary efficiency and suggests stricter attendance and accountability rules for MPs to ensure meaningful representation and governance. #womensreservation #indiapolitics #tehseenpoonawalla #womenempowerment #parliamentreformshow more

The Times Of India

13,962,111 subscribers

34,516 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Women's Quota Bill A 'Trick' To Increase Lok Sabha Seats? | Delimitation | Slam Dunk With Tehseen Is the Women’s Reservation push also a numbers game? With the Modi government introducing the Bill in a special Parliament session, a larger question emerges: delimitation. The proposal could expand Lok Sabha seats to enable 33% reservation for women. The Opposition supports reservation in principle, but wants closer scrutiny of the process. Will an increase in seats change the balance of power? The Centre says all states will see around a 50% rise in representation, easing southern concerns. However, worries persist that northern states may gain more seats, potentially shifting political advantage. In Slam Dunk With Tehseen, Tehseen Poonawalla (Tehseen Poonawalla Official 🇮🇳) raises key questions and highlights the risk of reform turning into political strategy. #womenreservationbill #delimitation #parliament #bjp #congress #slamdunk #tehseenpoonawalla

Women's Quota Bill A 'Trick' To Increase Lok Sabha Seats? | Delimitation | Slam Dunk With Tehseen Is the Women’s Reservation push also a numbers game? With the Modi government introducing the Bill in a special Parliament session, a larger question emerges: delimitation. The proposal could expand Lok Sabha seats to enable 33% reservation for women. The Opposition supports reservation in principle, but wants closer scrutiny of the process. Will an increase in seats change the balance of power? The Centre says all states will see around a 50% rise in representation, easing southern concerns. However, worries persist that northern states may gain more seats, potentially shifting political advantage. In Slam Dunk With Tehseen, Tehseen Poonawalla (Tehseen Poonawalla Official 🇮🇳) raises key questions and highlights the risk of reform turning into political strategy. #womenreservationbill #delimitation #parliament #bjp #congress #slamdunk #tehseenpoonawalla

The Times Of India

13,438 views • 4 months ago

E20 Fuel Under Fire: Tehseen Poonawalla Demands Transparency, Attacks Nitin Gadkari Political analyst Tehseen Poonawalla has questioned the government's E20 fuel policy, while welcoming its reported decision not to introduce E25-blended fuel. He argued that the NITI Aayog had envisaged mandatory E20 rollout only by 2030 after adequate infrastructure was in place. Poonawalla demanded that all documents related to the E20 policy be made public and called for continued availability of E0 and E10 fuel, saying most vehicles on Indian roads are pre-2023 and E10-compliant. He also sought solutions for affected vehicle owners, questioned automakers' guidance on ethanol compatibility, alleged a conflict of interest involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari's family, and warned of further protests if the concerns remain unresolved. #e20fuel #ethanol #fuelpolicy #automobile #nitigadkari #nitiaayog #carnews #bikenews #breakingnews #indianews Tehseen Poonawalla Official 🇮🇳

E20 Fuel Under Fire: Tehseen Poonawalla Demands Transparency, Attacks Nitin Gadkari Political analyst Tehseen Poonawalla has questioned the government's E20 fuel policy, while welcoming its reported decision not to introduce E25-blended fuel. He argued that the NITI Aayog had envisaged mandatory E20 rollout only by 2030 after adequate infrastructure was in place. Poonawalla demanded that all documents related to the E20 policy be made public and called for continued availability of E0 and E10 fuel, saying most vehicles on Indian roads are pre-2023 and E10-compliant. He also sought solutions for affected vehicle owners, questioned automakers' guidance on ethanol compatibility, alleged a conflict of interest involving Union Minister Nitin Gadkari's family, and warned of further protests if the concerns remain unresolved. #e20fuel #ethanol #fuelpolicy #automobile #nitigadkari #nitiaayog #carnews #bikenews #breakingnews #indianews Tehseen Poonawalla Official 🇮🇳

The Times Of India

74,862 views • 1 month ago

Hon CM of Andhra Pradesh Thiru N Chandrababu Naidu avl in his press meeting in Chennai made it clear that the women’s reservation bill was not anti-South or anti-small states. It is a bill that provides a 50% increase in seats, with 33% reserved for women, and ensures no state loses representation. He also pointed out that Congress has repeatedly opposed women’s reservation in the past, including when the bill was introduced under former PMs Thiru Deve Gowda avl, Thiru Atal Bihari Vajpayee avl, and later even during their own Govt too. His question was simple: how can the DMK-Congress camp call this injustice to South India when the bill is designed to expand representation?

Hon CM of Andhra Pradesh Thiru N Chandrababu Naidu avl in his press meeting in Chennai made it clear that the women’s reservation bill was not anti-South or anti-small states. It is a bill that provides a 50% increase in seats, with 33% reserved for women, and ensures no state loses representation. He also pointed out that Congress has repeatedly opposed women’s reservation in the past, including when the bill was introduced under former PMs Thiru Deve Gowda avl, Thiru Atal Bihari Vajpayee avl, and later even during their own Govt too. His question was simple: how can the DMK-Congress camp call this injustice to South India when the bill is designed to expand representation?

K.Annamalai

121,569 views • 4 months ago

He is Dr. Prashant Nanda, a renowned actor/director and member of the Rajya Sabha representing Biju Janata Dal. He was part of the Joint Committee that endorsed the Forest (Conservation) Amendment Bill 2023. Despite the opposition's decision to boycott the session & his party's whip to support the Bill- Dr. Nanda's courage and effective utilization of parliamentary privilege demonstrate his commitment to raising pertinent questions. It serves as a testament to the understanding that being a parliamentarian is both an honor and a responsibility, transcending party alliances and opposition lines. Even amidst claims that there are no dissenting voices against the Bill, he stands as a beacon of hope, fearlessly voicing concerns and seeking clarity from the Minister. It is essential to express gratitude to politicians like him, who uphold the spirit of democracy and strive for transparency and accountability in governance. Nonetheless, his views have been duly noted in the annals of parliamentary history of the 2023 amendment to the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980. It is evident that history will be kinder to Dr. Nanda when it comes to the approval of Forest Bill of 2023. Sharing some glimpses of his speech during the Rajya Sabha debate on the Bill. #Forest #Conservation #ParliamentMonsoonSession

He is Dr. Prashant Nanda, a renowned actor/director and member of the Rajya Sabha representing Biju Janata Dal. He was part of the Joint Committee that endorsed the Forest (Conservation) Amendment Bill 2023. Despite the opposition's decision to boycott the session & his party's whip to support the Bill- Dr. Nanda's courage and effective utilization of parliamentary privilege demonstrate his commitment to raising pertinent questions. It serves as a testament to the understanding that being a parliamentarian is both an honor and a responsibility, transcending party alliances and opposition lines. Even amidst claims that there are no dissenting voices against the Bill, he stands as a beacon of hope, fearlessly voicing concerns and seeking clarity from the Minister. It is essential to express gratitude to politicians like him, who uphold the spirit of democracy and strive for transparency and accountability in governance. Nonetheless, his views have been duly noted in the annals of parliamentary history of the 2023 amendment to the Forest (Conservation) Act 1980. It is evident that history will be kinder to Dr. Nanda when it comes to the approval of Forest Bill of 2023. Sharing some glimpses of his speech during the Rajya Sabha debate on the Bill. #Forest #Conservation #ParliamentMonsoonSession

Debadityo Sinha

33,794 views • 3 years ago

The Barry Young interview should be compulsory viewing for everyone—but particularly for police officers, lawyers, prosecutors, and members of the judiciary. Whatever your views on COVID-19 vaccines, the issues and questions it raises about transparency, accountability, and the handling of public health data deserve careful consideration. Credit to FreeNZ for producing the interview, and to Liz Gunn for conducting the interview with Barry Young. Barry Young is regarded by many as a whistleblower, and supporters argue he should have been afforded whistleblower protections rather than being arrested after disclosing information he believed was in the public interest. Keep watching CLUB GRUBBERY - BULLSEYE

The Barry Young interview should be compulsory viewing for everyone—but particularly for police officers, lawyers, prosecutors, and members of the judiciary. Whatever your views on COVID-19 vaccines, the issues and questions it raises about transparency, accountability, and the handling of public health data deserve careful consideration. Credit to FreeNZ for producing the interview, and to Liz Gunn for conducting the interview with Barry Young. Barry Young is regarded by many as a whistleblower, and supporters argue he should have been afforded whistleblower protections rather than being arrested after disclosing information he believed was in the public interest. Keep watching CLUB GRUBBERY - BULLSEYE

John Larter

11,013 views • 29 days ago

The speaker argues that the current student protests over exam paper leaks should not be limited to demanding the resignation of the Education Minister. Instead, he claims the root cause lies with the central government, alleging that institutions such as the Election Commission and the electoral system have been compromised. Key themes include: Criticism of the Prime Minister, the BJP, RSS, and the Union government. Allegations that repeated exam paper leaks reflect systemic governance failures. Calls for a broader political movement rather than a single-issue protest. Strong criticism of EVMs and advocacy for a return to paper ballots. Claims that democratic institutions have been weakened. Criticism of India's foreign policy, particularly regarding the US, Israel, Iran, China, and oil imports. Appeals for youth and citizens to participate in peaceful, sustained democratic movements. The video primarily expresses political opinions and allegations, many of which are disputed or not established as fact. For example: Claims that elections cannot be won unless permitted by the Prime Minister are political assertions, not proven facts. Statements about the Election Commission being completely controlled or elections being predetermined remain matters of political debate rather than judicially established conclusions. References to exam paper leaks are grounded in real incidents, but the attribution of responsibility to specific political actors is the speaker's interpretation. This video is less a news report and more a political speech. It mixes genuine public concerns—such as exam paper leaks, unemployment, and institutional accountability—with strong political accusations and personal opinions. Some criticisms are based on real events, while many broader conclusions are contested and should not be accepted as established facts without independent evidence. A healthy democracy allows criticism of governments, but it also requires citizens to distinguish between verified facts, political opinion, and rhetorical claims.

The speaker argues that the current student protests over exam paper leaks should not be limited to demanding the resignation of the Education Minister. Instead, he claims the root cause lies with the central government, alleging that institutions such as the Election Commission and the electoral system have been compromised. Key themes include: Criticism of the Prime Minister, the BJP, RSS, and the Union government. Allegations that repeated exam paper leaks reflect systemic governance failures. Calls for a broader political movement rather than a single-issue protest. Strong criticism of EVMs and advocacy for a return to paper ballots. Claims that democratic institutions have been weakened. Criticism of India's foreign policy, particularly regarding the US, Israel, Iran, China, and oil imports. Appeals for youth and citizens to participate in peaceful, sustained democratic movements. The video primarily expresses political opinions and allegations, many of which are disputed or not established as fact. For example: Claims that elections cannot be won unless permitted by the Prime Minister are political assertions, not proven facts. Statements about the Election Commission being completely controlled or elections being predetermined remain matters of political debate rather than judicially established conclusions. References to exam paper leaks are grounded in real incidents, but the attribution of responsibility to specific political actors is the speaker's interpretation. This video is less a news report and more a political speech. It mixes genuine public concerns—such as exam paper leaks, unemployment, and institutional accountability—with strong political accusations and personal opinions. Some criticisms are based on real events, while many broader conclusions are contested and should not be accepted as established facts without independent evidence. A healthy democracy allows criticism of governments, but it also requires citizens to distinguish between verified facts, political opinion, and rhetorical claims.

Ashok Dadhwal

14,868 views • 1 month ago

🚨 “Ban Nick Shirley Bill” — AB 2624 A government that moves to limit transparency is a government that has something to hide. AB 2624: the “Ban Nick Shirley Bill” raises serious concerns about the future of investigative journalism in California. This bill would expand restrictions around recording and documenting inside certain facilities, including organizations that receive government funding. In practice, that means journalists and independent investigators could face legal penalties simply for documenting what’s happening inside taxpayer-funded operations. Think about that. The very people trying to expose fraud, abuse, or mismanagement could be the ones punished. This bill is backed by CHIRLA—an organization that has received millions in taxpayer funding over the years while also taking strong and often controversial positions on immigration policy and enforcement. Now the same ecosystem benefiting from public dollars is supporting legislation that could limit scrutiny and reduce transparency. Californians deserve the opposite. If taxpayer money is being spent, the public has a right to know how it’s being used. Journalists should be protected for exposing the truth—not threatened with penalties. Transparency isn’t optional

🚨 “Ban Nick Shirley Bill” — AB 2624 A government that moves to limit transparency is a government that has something to hide. AB 2624: the “Ban Nick Shirley Bill” raises serious concerns about the future of investigative journalism in California. This bill would expand restrictions around recording and documenting inside certain facilities, including organizations that receive government funding. In practice, that means journalists and independent investigators could face legal penalties simply for documenting what’s happening inside taxpayer-funded operations. Think about that. The very people trying to expose fraud, abuse, or mismanagement could be the ones punished. This bill is backed by CHIRLA—an organization that has received millions in taxpayer funding over the years while also taking strong and often controversial positions on immigration policy and enforcement. Now the same ecosystem benefiting from public dollars is supporting legislation that could limit scrutiny and reduce transparency. Californians deserve the opposite. If taxpayer money is being spent, the public has a right to know how it’s being used. Journalists should be protected for exposing the truth—not threatened with penalties. Transparency isn’t optional

David Tangipa

45,165 views • 4 months ago

I am glad that the National Assembly has approved the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal (Amendment) Bill, which I sponsored. Going forward, contracts below Ksh 1Billion will ONLY be awarded to local contractors. For contracts over ksh 1Billion, international firms will have to enter into joint ventures with local firms for them to be awarded contracts. This will ensure that our local firms benefit through capacity building and technology transfer from the international firms. Historically, Kenyan firms have been sidelined, and therefore, the Bill will ensure that local entrepreneurs are given a chance to compete effectively. Issues of delayed payment will be a thing of the past as the Bill seeks to provide efficient contractor payment, enabling a more vibrant entrepreneurship ecosystem and cashflow for sustaining economic activities. Overall, the Bill seeks to address the inefficiencies in the public procurement systems while promoting transparency and accountability. Most importantly, the Bill will empower local contractors and ensure their competitiveness by curbing monopolies and unfair competition. This will enhance inclusive growth for our local contractors. The Bill embodies our commitment to fostering economic inclusivity, promoting local enterprises, and ensuring public procurement serves as a strategic tool for national development. #KKSeason3Loading #Molo

I am glad that the National Assembly has approved the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal (Amendment) Bill, which I sponsored. Going forward, contracts below Ksh 1Billion will ONLY be awarded to local contractors. For contracts over ksh 1Billion, international firms will have to enter into joint ventures with local firms for them to be awarded contracts. This will ensure that our local firms benefit through capacity building and technology transfer from the international firms. Historically, Kenyan firms have been sidelined, and therefore, the Bill will ensure that local entrepreneurs are given a chance to compete effectively. Issues of delayed payment will be a thing of the past as the Bill seeks to provide efficient contractor payment, enabling a more vibrant entrepreneurship ecosystem and cashflow for sustaining economic activities. Overall, the Bill seeks to address the inefficiencies in the public procurement systems while promoting transparency and accountability. Most importantly, the Bill will empower local contractors and ensure their competitiveness by curbing monopolies and unfair competition. This will enhance inclusive growth for our local contractors. The Bill embodies our commitment to fostering economic inclusivity, promoting local enterprises, and ensuring public procurement serves as a strategic tool for national development. #KKSeason3Loading #Molo

Hon FCPA Kuria Kimani, CBS - MP Molo

81,453 views • 1 year ago

Alhaji Dr Oriyomi Hamzat has once again spoken boldly against the antics of desperate politicians whose only interest is personal gain rather than the progress of the people. In a strongly worded statement, the Accord flagbearer condemned the politics of desperation, deception, and manipulation, stressing that Oyo State deserves leaders with integrity, vision, and a genuine commitment to public service. According to him, the era of using propaganda, intimidation, and empty promises to deceive the electorate is gradually coming to an end. He urged the people of Oyo State to remain vigilant and refuse to be swayed by politicians who only remember the masses during election periods. The governorship candidate reaffirmed his dedication to transparent governance, accountability, and people-oriented policies that will improve the lives of citizens across the state. He maintained that true leadership is about service, not self-interest, and that the future of Oyo State must not be sacrificed on the altar of political desperation. As the political landscape continues to evolve, his message serves as a reminder that credibility, competence, and character remain the foundation of sustainable leadership and good governance.

Alhaji Dr Oriyomi Hamzat has once again spoken boldly against the antics of desperate politicians whose only interest is personal gain rather than the progress of the people. In a strongly worded statement, the Accord flagbearer condemned the politics of desperation, deception, and manipulation, stressing that Oyo State deserves leaders with integrity, vision, and a genuine commitment to public service. According to him, the era of using propaganda, intimidation, and empty promises to deceive the electorate is gradually coming to an end. He urged the people of Oyo State to remain vigilant and refuse to be swayed by politicians who only remember the masses during election periods. The governorship candidate reaffirmed his dedication to transparent governance, accountability, and people-oriented policies that will improve the lives of citizens across the state. He maintained that true leadership is about service, not self-interest, and that the future of Oyo State must not be sacrificed on the altar of political desperation. As the political landscape continues to evolve, his message serves as a reminder that credibility, competence, and character remain the foundation of sustainable leadership and good governance.

PRIME🥇😎🇳🇬

10,922 views • 2 months ago

The House of Reps today passed 39 constitutional amendment bills for a second reading. The bills are: A bill for General Elections to the Office of the President, State Governors, National Assembly, State Houses of Assembly and Local Government Area Councils shall be conducted simultaneously on the same date. A bill for the Establishment of State Police and Local Government Police. A bill to Establish the FCT House of Assembly. Court of Appeal the Final Appeal Court in Governorship, National and State Houses of Assembly Election Petitions. A bill to Provide for Compulsory Resignation of National and State Executive Members of Political Parties Seeking Elective Government Positions. A bill to Provide for the Determination of All Appeals Arising from Election Petition Tribunals Prior to Swearing-in of President-Elect, Vice-President-Elect, Governor-Elect, Deputy Governor-Elect, Members-Elect of the National and State Assembles. A bill to Vest the INEC with the Power to Conduct Local Government Area Council Elections. A bill to Require the Official Resignation from Political Party before Defection by Members of the National Assembly and State House of Assembly. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) to grant the National Assembly Power to Alter Timelines for Election Tribunals. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Cap. C23, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 to Establish the National Local Government Electoral Commission as an Independent Body Responsible for Organising, Conducting, and Supervising Elections into the Offices of Chairmen and Councilors of all the Local Governments Across the Federation, Including the Area Councils of the Federal Capital Territory, ensure the Credibility, Transparency, and Fairness of Local Government Elections and Promote Democratic Governance at the Grassroots Level. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to relieve the State Independent Electoral Commissions of the powers to conduct Local Government Council elections and bestow same on the Independent National Electoral Commission. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as altered) to Provide for Special Seats for the Physically Challenged Persons in Nigeria's Federal, State and Local Government Areas, and Legislative Houses. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as (amended) to provide for Six Special Seats for Special Interest Groups in the House of Representatives. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to Change the Name of the Auditor-General of the Federation to Auditor-General of the Federal Government. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 to Remove the Restriction Placed on Power and Duties of the Auditor-General of the Federation and States by Sections 85(2) and 125(2) Respectively and to Insert New Sections in the Constitution that Shall Provide for the Financial Autonomy of the Offices of the Auditor-General of the Federation and of the States. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to strengthen the Office of the Auditor-General of the Federation and the Auditor-General of a State. A Bill to Establish and Empower the Political Parties Registration and Regulatory Commission to Register, Regulate, and Monitor the Organization and Operation of Political Parties. A Bill to Expand the Number of Justices of the Supreme Court, enhance Service efficiency and timely dispensation of Justices, Improve Citizens' Access to Justice and Conform with Federal Character Principles. And other amendments bills.

The House of Reps today passed 39 constitutional amendment bills for a second reading. The bills are: A bill for General Elections to the Office of the President, State Governors, National Assembly, State Houses of Assembly and Local Government Area Councils shall be conducted simultaneously on the same date. A bill for the Establishment of State Police and Local Government Police. A bill to Establish the FCT House of Assembly. Court of Appeal the Final Appeal Court in Governorship, National and State Houses of Assembly Election Petitions. A bill to Provide for Compulsory Resignation of National and State Executive Members of Political Parties Seeking Elective Government Positions. A bill to Provide for the Determination of All Appeals Arising from Election Petition Tribunals Prior to Swearing-in of President-Elect, Vice-President-Elect, Governor-Elect, Deputy Governor-Elect, Members-Elect of the National and State Assembles. A bill to Vest the INEC with the Power to Conduct Local Government Area Council Elections. A bill to Require the Official Resignation from Political Party before Defection by Members of the National Assembly and State House of Assembly. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) to grant the National Assembly Power to Alter Timelines for Election Tribunals. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Cap. C23, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004 to Establish the National Local Government Electoral Commission as an Independent Body Responsible for Organising, Conducting, and Supervising Elections into the Offices of Chairmen and Councilors of all the Local Governments Across the Federation, Including the Area Councils of the Federal Capital Territory, ensure the Credibility, Transparency, and Fairness of Local Government Elections and Promote Democratic Governance at the Grassroots Level. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to relieve the State Independent Electoral Commissions of the powers to conduct Local Government Council elections and bestow same on the Independent National Electoral Commission. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as altered) to Provide for Special Seats for the Physically Challenged Persons in Nigeria's Federal, State and Local Government Areas, and Legislative Houses. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 as (amended) to provide for Six Special Seats for Special Interest Groups in the House of Representatives. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to Change the Name of the Auditor-General of the Federation to Auditor-General of the Federal Government. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 to Remove the Restriction Placed on Power and Duties of the Auditor-General of the Federation and States by Sections 85(2) and 125(2) Respectively and to Insert New Sections in the Constitution that Shall Provide for the Financial Autonomy of the Offices of the Auditor-General of the Federation and of the States. A Bill for an Act to Alter the Provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 to strengthen the Office of the Auditor-General of the Federation and the Auditor-General of a State. A Bill to Establish and Empower the Political Parties Registration and Regulatory Commission to Register, Regulate, and Monitor the Organization and Operation of Political Parties. A Bill to Expand the Number of Justices of the Supreme Court, enhance Service efficiency and timely dispensation of Justices, Improve Citizens' Access to Justice and Conform with Federal Character Principles. And other amendments bills.

Imran Muhammad

196,471 views • 1 year ago

Someone like Festus Keyamo should understand that public trust is built on consistency. Many Nigerians remember that he once questioned the credibility of Bola Ahmed Tinubu in 1999. Years later, he defended the President over questions about his academic records, arguing that great men can study and pass examinations from home. That history is why some people now question the consistency of his public positions. Now, he has turned his attention to Peter Obi. Whether you support Peter Obi or not, political criticism should be based on facts, fairness, and accountability—not selective standards. If Peter Obi had chosen to live like many traditional Nigerian politicians, would he be subjected to the same level of scrutiny over his personal lifestyle? Even some APC office holders, including local government officials, are not subjected to the same public treatment. One of the greatest challenges facing Nigeria today is that what should be normal—humility, accountability, and respect for due process—is sometimes portrayed as unusual, while conduct that should be questioned is normalized. As citizens, we should pay attention and demand the same standards for everyone, regardless of political affiliation. I still believe that one day we will have a Nigeria where fairness, accountability, and equal treatment under the law are the norm. Justice can never be cracked.

Someone like Festus Keyamo should understand that public trust is built on consistency. Many Nigerians remember that he once questioned the credibility of Bola Ahmed Tinubu in 1999. Years later, he defended the President over questions about his academic records, arguing that great men can study and pass examinations from home. That history is why some people now question the consistency of his public positions. Now, he has turned his attention to Peter Obi. Whether you support Peter Obi or not, political criticism should be based on facts, fairness, and accountability—not selective standards. If Peter Obi had chosen to live like many traditional Nigerian politicians, would he be subjected to the same level of scrutiny over his personal lifestyle? Even some APC office holders, including local government officials, are not subjected to the same public treatment. One of the greatest challenges facing Nigeria today is that what should be normal—humility, accountability, and respect for due process—is sometimes portrayed as unusual, while conduct that should be questioned is normalized. As citizens, we should pay attention and demand the same standards for everyone, regardless of political affiliation. I still believe that one day we will have a Nigeria where fairness, accountability, and equal treatment under the law are the norm. Justice can never be cracked.

JusticeCrack

30,988 views • 1 month ago

All the allegations and false narratives that have been used over the years to demarket Peter Obi are gradually being exposed for what they truly are political propaganda designed to distract Nigerians from competence, accountability, and good governance. Today, even respected northern voices and independent investigators who took time to carefully examine many of these accusations have openly clarified that several of the claims against His Excellency Peter Obi were either distorted, exaggerated, or completely false. Facts, records, and his track record in public office continue to speak louder than sponsored blackmail. From his prudent management of Anambra State resources, to his consistent advocacy for cutting the cost of governance, investing in education, supporting small businesses, and building a productive economy, Peter Obi has remained one of the few Nigerian leaders whose public and private records continue to reflect discipline, transparency, and accountability. Rather than wasting public funds on luxuries, unnecessary convoys, extravagant government spending, or personal comfort projects, he has consistently preached and practiced leadership built on sacrifice, prudence, and service to the people. This consistency is why many Nigerians across regions, tribes, and religions continue to believe in his vision for a better Nigeria. The truth will always prevail over propaganda. Nigerians are becoming more informed, more aware, and more determined to support leaders with proven competence, integrity, and genuine concern for the nation. A New Nigeria is POssible, and by the grace of God, Nigeria will be OK

All the allegations and false narratives that have been used over the years to demarket Peter Obi are gradually being exposed for what they truly are political propaganda designed to distract Nigerians from competence, accountability, and good governance. Today, even respected northern voices and independent investigators who took time to carefully examine many of these accusations have openly clarified that several of the claims against His Excellency Peter Obi were either distorted, exaggerated, or completely false. Facts, records, and his track record in public office continue to speak louder than sponsored blackmail. From his prudent management of Anambra State resources, to his consistent advocacy for cutting the cost of governance, investing in education, supporting small businesses, and building a productive economy, Peter Obi has remained one of the few Nigerian leaders whose public and private records continue to reflect discipline, transparency, and accountability. Rather than wasting public funds on luxuries, unnecessary convoys, extravagant government spending, or personal comfort projects, he has consistently preached and practiced leadership built on sacrifice, prudence, and service to the people. This consistency is why many Nigerians across regions, tribes, and religions continue to believe in his vision for a better Nigeria. The truth will always prevail over propaganda. Nigerians are becoming more informed, more aware, and more determined to support leaders with proven competence, integrity, and genuine concern for the nation. A New Nigeria is POssible, and by the grace of God, Nigeria will be OK

Dr Yunusa Tanko

18,124 views • 3 months ago

The highly controversial Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, which seeks to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term of office by an extra two years and increase the presidential term from five to seven years, has now formally entered the parliamentary process in Zimbabwe. Speaking in Parliament today, its official main driver, Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi, said all Members of Parliament would be given an opportunity to debate the Bill before it is eventually put to a vote. The Bill seeks to fundamentally alter key aspects of Zimbabwe’s governance system, including the structure of the executive, local government, and the composition of Parliament. The Bill will now be debated in Parliament and could either be passed or rejected. Those opposed to the proposed amendments within both ZANUPF and the country maintain that such far-reaching constitutional changes require a national referendum as provided for in the Constitution of Zimbabwe rather than being decided solely through Parliament. Retired military generals who met President Mnangagwa on two separate occasions say he rejected their pleas to either shelve the Bill or submit it to a referendum. According to the generals, the president dismissed their concerns by telling them, “Whoever wins, wins.” The retired generals have since declared that the Bill will never become law, setting the stage for what some fear could become a major bloody confrontation within ZANUPF between factions aligned to President Mnangagwa and Vice President General Constantino Chiwenga, involving the military. If the Bill becomes law and extends President Mnangagwa’s stay in office, it will effectively close General Chiwenga’s pathway to the presidency, deepening tensions within the ruling party over the question of succession, which in the past triggered the military coup that removed Robert Mugabe after thirty seven year in power. The battle over Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 is therefore not only about constitutional reform, but also about the future balance of power within Zimbabwe’s governing elite. According to Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi, the vote on the Bill will not be conducted by secret ballot. Instead, Members of Parliament will vote openly, either by a show of hands or by physically moving to one side of the chamber to vote in favour and to the other side to vote against the Bill. The Zimbabwean Constitutional Court will ultimately have to decide whether the Bill should be subjected to a referendum or not. That decision is likely to have profound political and constitutional consequences. If the court rules against a referendum, it could trigger a constitutional crisis and become a flashpoint for future political struggles over the legitimacy of the constitutional amendment process and the exercise of state power. If President Mnangagwa prevails, he will become the first leader of ZANUPF not to be removed from power by the military. The party’s first leader, Reverend Ndabaningi Sithole, was removed through ZANLA military action during the liberation struggle, while its second leader, Robert Mugabe, was removed by the Zimbabwean military in November 2017. If Mnangagwa emerges triumphant from this process and serves out his political ambitions without military intervention, he will become the first leader of ZANUPF to leave or die in office without being removed by the military, breaking a pattern that has shaped the party’s leadership history for decades.

The highly controversial Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, which seeks to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s term of office by an extra two years and increase the presidential term from five to seven years, has now formally entered the parliamentary process in Zimbabwe. Speaking in Parliament today, its official main driver, Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi, said all Members of Parliament would be given an opportunity to debate the Bill before it is eventually put to a vote. The Bill seeks to fundamentally alter key aspects of Zimbabwe’s governance system, including the structure of the executive, local government, and the composition of Parliament. The Bill will now be debated in Parliament and could either be passed or rejected. Those opposed to the proposed amendments within both ZANUPF and the country maintain that such far-reaching constitutional changes require a national referendum as provided for in the Constitution of Zimbabwe rather than being decided solely through Parliament. Retired military generals who met President Mnangagwa on two separate occasions say he rejected their pleas to either shelve the Bill or submit it to a referendum. According to the generals, the president dismissed their concerns by telling them, “Whoever wins, wins.” The retired generals have since declared that the Bill will never become law, setting the stage for what some fear could become a major bloody confrontation within ZANUPF between factions aligned to President Mnangagwa and Vice President General Constantino Chiwenga, involving the military. If the Bill becomes law and extends President Mnangagwa’s stay in office, it will effectively close General Chiwenga’s pathway to the presidency, deepening tensions within the ruling party over the question of succession, which in the past triggered the military coup that removed Robert Mugabe after thirty seven year in power. The battle over Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 is therefore not only about constitutional reform, but also about the future balance of power within Zimbabwe’s governing elite. According to Justice Minister Ziyambi Ziyambi, the vote on the Bill will not be conducted by secret ballot. Instead, Members of Parliament will vote openly, either by a show of hands or by physically moving to one side of the chamber to vote in favour and to the other side to vote against the Bill. The Zimbabwean Constitutional Court will ultimately have to decide whether the Bill should be subjected to a referendum or not. That decision is likely to have profound political and constitutional consequences. If the court rules against a referendum, it could trigger a constitutional crisis and become a flashpoint for future political struggles over the legitimacy of the constitutional amendment process and the exercise of state power. If President Mnangagwa prevails, he will become the first leader of ZANUPF not to be removed from power by the military. The party’s first leader, Reverend Ndabaningi Sithole, was removed through ZANLA military action during the liberation struggle, while its second leader, Robert Mugabe, was removed by the Zimbabwean military in November 2017. If Mnangagwa emerges triumphant from this process and serves out his political ambitions without military intervention, he will become the first leader of ZANUPF to leave or die in office without being removed by the military, breaking a pattern that has shaped the party’s leadership history for decades.

Hopewell Chin’ono

45,815 views • 2 months ago

Everything I have always said about His Excellency Peter Obi comes down to one thing leadership built on prudence, accountability, and genuine concern for the people. Peter Obi has consistently shown a careful and disciplined approach towards the economy. He understands that governance is not about luxury, waste, or enriching a few individuals while millions suffer. Governance must be done prudently, with every kobo accounted for and directed towards improving the lives of the people. One thing that stands him out is his consistency in advocating for the reduction of the cost of governance. At a time when many public office holders focus on buying unnecessary houses, luxury properties, and expensive lounges in states they do not even govern, Peter Obi continues to preach and practice simplicity, accountability, and responsible management of public resources. Nigeria does not need leaders who see public office as an opportunity for personal enjoyment. Nigeria needs leaders who will invest in education, healthcare, security, production, and human development. Leaders who understand that public funds belong to the people and must be used for the benefit of the people. A working economy is built through discipline, production, transparency, and sacrifice not reckless spending and selfish leadership. This is the consistency Peter Obi has continued to demonstrate over the years. A new Nigeria is possible, and by the grace of God, Nigeria will be OK

Everything I have always said about His Excellency Peter Obi comes down to one thing leadership built on prudence, accountability, and genuine concern for the people. Peter Obi has consistently shown a careful and disciplined approach towards the economy. He understands that governance is not about luxury, waste, or enriching a few individuals while millions suffer. Governance must be done prudently, with every kobo accounted for and directed towards improving the lives of the people. One thing that stands him out is his consistency in advocating for the reduction of the cost of governance. At a time when many public office holders focus on buying unnecessary houses, luxury properties, and expensive lounges in states they do not even govern, Peter Obi continues to preach and practice simplicity, accountability, and responsible management of public resources. Nigeria does not need leaders who see public office as an opportunity for personal enjoyment. Nigeria needs leaders who will invest in education, healthcare, security, production, and human development. Leaders who understand that public funds belong to the people and must be used for the benefit of the people. A working economy is built through discipline, production, transparency, and sacrifice not reckless spending and selfish leadership. This is the consistency Peter Obi has continued to demonstrate over the years. A new Nigeria is possible, and by the grace of God, Nigeria will be OK

Dr Yunusa Tanko

29,996 views • 3 months ago

Katie Telford, Katie Telford as Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, has been a central figure in a series of controversies that paint a troubling picture of governance under her watch. Her role in several high-profile controversies reveals significant issues of incompetence, lack of transparency, and questionable ethics within the Trudeau administration. One of the most glaring issues involving Telford is the WE Charity scandal. This scandal centers on the Canadian government awarding a $912 million student grant program to WE Charity, an organization with close ties to the Trudeau family. While Telford was not the central figure in this scandal, her position within the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) during this period made her complicit in the fallout. Both Telford and Trudeau faced intense scrutiny for failing to recuse themselves from the decision-making process, despite these connections. The scandal raised serious questions about conflicts of interest and the overall decision-making process within the PMO, revealing a troubling lack of ethical governance and transparency. Additionally, Telford's role came under scrutiny during allegations of foreign election interference, particularly concerning attempts by the Chinese government to influence Canadian elections. Her responsibilities included managing sensitive political information related to these allegations. The Liberal government’s handling of these serious issues, under her watch, has been criticized for a lack of decisive action and transparency. This failure to address the allegations adequately highlights broader concerns about the integrity of the political process and the administration's commitment to safeguarding democratic principles. The controversy surrounding moving expenses further complicates Telford’s record. She, along with her colleague Gerald Butts, was required to repay moving expenses deemed "unreasonable" by the government. While this may seem like an administrative issue, it contributes to a broader narrative of potential misuse of public funds by high-ranking officials. Such incidents, though perhaps not directly involving personal misconduct, reflect poorly on the fiscal responsibility and ethical standards within the PMO, adding to the accumulation of criticisms against Telford. Telford’s tenure as Trudeau’s Chief of Staff has also been marked by general political criticism. Opposition parties and critics frequently target her influence and decisions within the PMO. These criticisms, while sometimes broad or speculative, suggest a pattern of political maneuvering and possibly unethical behavior. Her long tenure in this position has made her a focal point for criticism regarding the broader issues of political dysfunction and the erosion of public trust in the administration. Social media platforms and public discourse often blur the lines between fact and speculation, and while they may contain mixed information about Telford’s involvement in political decisions or her personal life, the persistent themes of lack of transparency and ethical concerns are significant. Public figures in high-stakes roles are often subject to intense scrutiny, and Telford’s involvement in these controversies reflects broader problems within the Trudeau administration. In conclusion, while there may not be direct personal scandals involving Katie Telford, her role in significant political controversies and administrative missteps paints a picture of a troubled administration characterized by mismanagement and ethical lapses. The accumulation of controversies associated with her role reveals systemic issues within the Trudeau government, contributing to an environment of diminished trust and accountability in Canadian politics.

Vote Canada

73,438 views • 1 year ago

Tejasvi Surya just referred to women reservation as 'encroachment'! Unbelievably sick, but true (see video). He is arguing why seats need to increase to 'accommodate' women reservation. Giving example of #Kerala, he says that if after Census of 2027, delimitation happens on basis of 2027 Census, Kerala seats will come down from 20 to 14, if the total number of seats remain at 550. But then, he says that of these 14, 1/3rd will need to be reserved for women. MPs like K.C. Venugopal will lose their seat and the very clearly says that, "Narendra Modi government's proposal is to not only protect existing seats from 'encroachment' but also to ensure that Kerala doesn't lose out'. Women reservation is not encroachment, it is a constitutional imperative, a right. But well, it's expected of men to feel threatened every time women demand what is their due. But glad that Surya made it amply clear that all these Bills are really not about women, it's just about consolidating power! #womenreservation #delimitation

Tejasvi Surya just referred to women reservation as 'encroachment'! Unbelievably sick, but true (see video). He is arguing why seats need to increase to 'accommodate' women reservation. Giving example of #Kerala, he says that if after Census of 2027, delimitation happens on basis of 2027 Census, Kerala seats will come down from 20 to 14, if the total number of seats remain at 550. But then, he says that of these 14, 1/3rd will need to be reserved for women. MPs like K.C. Venugopal will lose their seat and the very clearly says that, "Narendra Modi government's proposal is to not only protect existing seats from 'encroachment' but also to ensure that Kerala doesn't lose out'. Women reservation is not encroachment, it is a constitutional imperative, a right. But well, it's expected of men to feel threatened every time women demand what is their due. But glad that Surya made it amply clear that all these Bills are really not about women, it's just about consolidating power! #womenreservation #delimitation

Maadhyam

26,013 views • 4 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On Rahul Gandhi's 'Chhatro Ki Goonj' program in Pune yesterday, Delhi State Haj Committee Chairperson Kausar Jahan says, "Rahul Gandhi speaks at length about women's rights and empowerment from the stage. However, when it actually comes to providing a 33% reservation for women in Parliament and state assemblies, the Congress party starts playing politics. By opposing the proposal regarding women's rights in April 2026, Rahul Gandhi has clearly demonstrated that his political self-interest matters more to him than women's empowerment. My point is that if Rahul Gandhi is genuinely concerned about women's rights and empowerment, he should convey this to the government clearly—especially when the issue of women's reservation is raised... Prime Minister Modi has already stated that the credit for this will be shared by all. If Mr. Rahul Gandhi were to convey his support, I believe the government would immediately call a special session to pass the bill, allowing it to be implemented by 2029..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Rahul Gandhi's 'Chhatro Ki Goonj' program in Pune yesterday, Delhi State Haj Committee Chairperson Kausar Jahan says, "Rahul Gandhi speaks at length about women's rights and empowerment from the stage. However, when it actually comes to providing a 33% reservation for women in Parliament and state assemblies, the Congress party starts playing politics. By opposing the proposal regarding women's rights in April 2026, Rahul Gandhi has clearly demonstrated that his political self-interest matters more to him than women's empowerment. My point is that if Rahul Gandhi is genuinely concerned about women's rights and empowerment, he should convey this to the government clearly—especially when the issue of women's reservation is raised... Prime Minister Modi has already stated that the credit for this will be shared by all. If Mr. Rahul Gandhi were to convey his support, I believe the government would immediately call a special session to pass the bill, allowing it to be implemented by 2029..."

ANI

95,432 views • 6 days ago

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼️ 🚨 RFK JR Sounds the Alarm on the WHO IHR Amendment's — A “Trojan Horse” is Quietly being Installed to implement Digital Health ID's and a Global Health Database • he expresses concerns about the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and their potential to "open the door" to "that kind of system of health IDs," suggesting a pathway to broader surveillance and control mechanisms. • He says the WHO is laying the groundwork for a CENTRALIZED Medical Database for every human being • He connects the potential for digital health IDs to broader issues of surveillance and industry influence. He Mentions Mass "surveillance" and he refers to "industry influence," implying that these IDs could be part of a larger mass surveillance framework that benefits certain industries while encroaching on individual privacy and freedoms. • Kennedy's concerns are framed within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where he believes critical information and criticisms were suppressed. He suggests that the amendments could perpetuate similar dynamics, potentially using digital health IDs as a tool for narrative management and censorship, as seen during the pandemic. - His overall stance is that such measures, including digital health IDs, could jeopardize civil liberties and national sovereignty. He argues that the U.S. should not sign over authority that could lead to lockdowns and other public health measures without thorough consideration, especially when these measures might invite a system that undermines individual rights. What’s next? - Proposal and Adoption Process: The amendments were proposed and negotiated through the World Health Organization (WHO) processes, in an agreement by the World Health Assembly in May 2024 [World Health Assembly, 2024]. However, the implementation of these amendments is not automatic and requires further steps. - Opt-Out Period: There is a specific window for member states to opt out of these amendments. The U.S. and other countries have until NEXT WEEK, to formally reject the amendments. This opt-out period is crucial because it allows countries to decide whether to be bound by the new regulations.

HOLEE SHIZZLES‼️ 🚨 RFK JR Sounds the Alarm on the WHO IHR Amendment's — A “Trojan Horse” is Quietly being Installed to implement Digital Health ID's and a Global Health Database • he expresses concerns about the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) and their potential to "open the door" to "that kind of system of health IDs," suggesting a pathway to broader surveillance and control mechanisms. • He says the WHO is laying the groundwork for a CENTRALIZED Medical Database for every human being • He connects the potential for digital health IDs to broader issues of surveillance and industry influence. He Mentions Mass "surveillance" and he refers to "industry influence," implying that these IDs could be part of a larger mass surveillance framework that benefits certain industries while encroaching on individual privacy and freedoms. • Kennedy's concerns are framed within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, where he believes critical information and criticisms were suppressed. He suggests that the amendments could perpetuate similar dynamics, potentially using digital health IDs as a tool for narrative management and censorship, as seen during the pandemic. - His overall stance is that such measures, including digital health IDs, could jeopardize civil liberties and national sovereignty. He argues that the U.S. should not sign over authority that could lead to lockdowns and other public health measures without thorough consideration, especially when these measures might invite a system that undermines individual rights. What’s next? - Proposal and Adoption Process: The amendments were proposed and negotiated through the World Health Organization (WHO) processes, in an agreement by the World Health Assembly in May 2024 [World Health Assembly, 2024]. However, the implementation of these amendments is not automatic and requires further steps. - Opt-Out Period: There is a specific window for member states to opt out of these amendments. The U.S. and other countries have until NEXT WEEK, to formally reject the amendments. This opt-out period is crucial because it allows countries to decide whether to be bound by the new regulations.

MJTruthUltra

437,422 views • 1 year ago

At plenary today, I gave my contributions on a lead debate about a bill that sought to amend the Constitution so each geo-political zone can have a President and Vice President after 8 years. While it sounded idealistic and nice, the realities seemed different. Each region has numerous ethnicities and tribes. I also leaned against it as it infringes on the rights of every eligible Nigerian to contest. What is more important than zoning is for we, political and appointed leaders, to dedicate our time and resources for our people to the best of our ability. The antidote to tribalism and mistrust is quality governance across board. The unwritten agreement of power rotating between the North and South is sacrosanct. Political parties and leaders must respect it, as was the case in the 1999 Presidential Elections when only Southern candidates emerged as Presidential candidates. It is a failure on the part of the political class and our political parties that we cannot do the same nowadays. I believe there is no need to have it stated in the constitution as the concept of Federal Character is there to serve as a reminder to some extent. We have more important issues like quality and affordable education, health care insurance to citizens, financial inclusion, tacking unemployment, decreasing our infrastructure deficit and increasing transparency in the public sector. The aspect of the bill was stepped down.

At plenary today, I gave my contributions on a lead debate about a bill that sought to amend the Constitution so each geo-political zone can have a President and Vice President after 8 years. While it sounded idealistic and nice, the realities seemed different. Each region has numerous ethnicities and tribes. I also leaned against it as it infringes on the rights of every eligible Nigerian to contest. What is more important than zoning is for we, political and appointed leaders, to dedicate our time and resources for our people to the best of our ability. The antidote to tribalism and mistrust is quality governance across board. The unwritten agreement of power rotating between the North and South is sacrosanct. Political parties and leaders must respect it, as was the case in the 1999 Presidential Elections when only Southern candidates emerged as Presidential candidates. It is a failure on the part of the political class and our political parties that we cannot do the same nowadays. I believe there is no need to have it stated in the constitution as the concept of Federal Character is there to serve as a reminder to some extent. We have more important issues like quality and affordable education, health care insurance to citizens, financial inclusion, tacking unemployment, decreasing our infrastructure deficit and increasing transparency in the public sector. The aspect of the bill was stepped down.

Hon. Mohammed Bello El-Rufai

107,719 views • 1 year ago