Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

New Sculpt tool for #Blender 5.2 alpha "Scene Project Brush" a tool (that its going to become a brush in the future) that projects the sculpting mesh into the mesh behind or near depending how its setup. Imagine a shrinkwrap in a brush. by Nicola Dessì

63,343 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

20 Comments

Ribbit's profile picture
Ribbit6 months ago

Credits to Pablo as well, this was in the dev branch way back when. I used it extensively

Nahuel Belich's profile picture
Nahuel Belich6 months ago

@YoItsMeSidar i forgot to mention also Sean Kim, he did the last adaptations to commit it, i look for them in Twitter but didn't find their accounts to tag them, if they have

南 道爾🇺🇸🇯🇵🇮🇱's profile picture
南 道爾🇺🇸🇯🇵🇮🇱6 months ago

Does it preserve the mesh thickness?

Nahuel Belich's profile picture
Nahuel Belich6 months ago

up to some point, im not sure if its a bug or how it works, if you use 100% strength its squish the mesh. In the commit an offset value its mentioned to keep volume, im not sure Im going to give it a few days before report or mention something, this is an alpha version after all

Majestic 🚀's profile picture
Majestic 🚀6 months ago

Finally!

VIAdvena's profile picture
VIAdvena6 months ago

Waaaat! 🔥

quads's profile picture
quads6 months ago

Niceee

Jakovicz's profile picture
Jakovicz6 months ago

Massive!

BSMAGPIE's profile picture
BSMAGPIE6 months ago

Goddamn! That's excellent.

BlenCoat's profile picture
BlenCoat6 months ago

this is wow

LightShift Studio's profile picture
LightShift Studio6 months ago

🎨 Love new Blender tools!

Nahuel Belich's profile picture
Nahuel Belich6 months ago

YAY! the new brush now has an asset/preset in #blender 5.2 alpha By Sean Kim

Mic Tony's profile picture
Mic Tony6 months ago

this will be so good for cloth

6ªmsunset ↭'s profile picture
6ªmsunset ↭6 months ago

let us fucking go

Tomi's profile picture
Tomi6 months ago

the brush we didn’t know we needed.. this is huge!

Wetterschneider's profile picture
Wetterschneider6 months ago

fantastic!

Trinumedia's profile picture
Trinumedia6 months ago

@jimmygunawanapp Exciting!

CoolCool79's profile picture
CoolCool796 months ago

ALERT ALERT FIRST GOOD ADDITION IN LIKE 10 VERSIONS INCOMING 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

Edge group's profile picture
Edge group6 months ago

looks promising

SonicHush's profile picture
SonicHush6 months ago

лента не облегает так! что за бред?!

Related Videos

I can’t believe this is real Woman who works for California State Parks says they are not legally allowed to clear the brush in Los Angeles “We're issuing a permit for the homeowners — she tells me that there's legislation saying that the California State Parks are not allowed to clear the brush — So they're quote, not allowed to clear the brush, but they're allowed to issue a permit so that homeowners can clear the brush behind their houses for 100 up to 130 feet. So all these homes that back up to state land that isn't clear and they're at a clear danger for a wildfire aren't allowed to touch it. They have to get a permit to clear their brush and pay for it, and it's not their land” Yes this is 100% true, California is making homeowners PAY to clear brush because Democrats passed legislation restricting it for the state State Parks, Cal Fire, Public land restrictions say State agencies face limitations on large-scale brush clearing due to - CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) requirements says clearing brush can require lengthy environmental reviews - Habitat protections for rare plants, animals, or cultural resources California law (Public Resources Code 4291) requires homeowners in high fire hazard areas to maintain defensible space of 100- 130+ of reduced vegetation around structures. When your property backs up to state land, you often need a permit to clear or thin brush on the state land side Democrats are corrupt

Wall Street Apes

172,988 views • 3 months ago