Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

New UGC rules challenged in SC: - Contention 1: Caste discrimination not limited to reserved categories. - Contention 2: Rules should protect the dignity of all citizens. - Contention 3: Upper castes also victims of bigotry & animosity. Amita Wadhwa🇮🇳 shares more details.

39,080 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

#WATCH | On UGC Regulations 2026, Dr Vikas Divyakirti, founder and MD of Drishti IAS, says, "...No one is even talking about what happened to one or two children from the Northeast in Delhi. While the preamble of the Equity Committee even mentions the word 'race,' and also mentions 'place of birth, ' someone's place of birth is Nagaland, or let's say Mizoram, every person in Delhi is using strange language towards them, and that's not even addressed in the Equity Committee. In the Equity Committee, there is no representation for the people of different races, and no one is addressing it...The Equity Committee lacks representation of linguistic diversity. There is no representation at all. Why is it only about the OBC versus the General Category, and not about other categories?... You initially took six bases: religion, race, caste, gender, place of birth, and disability...When discrimination is mentioned, a whole paragraph is written, and in the discrimination paragraph, it clearly states religion, race, caste, gender, place of birth, disability, and any of them – there are six. Why did you need to write a separate paragraph on caste-based discrimination? When discrimination was already mentioned, why write a separate paragraph on caste-based discrimination? And if you did, why didn't you write a paragraph on religion, on race, on gender? All the categories. You should have written about all of them. Why are you segregating only one basis as a special basis in the definitions? I think those who drafted these rules haven't read them very carefully...The Supreme Court date was approaching, so they passed it in a hurry..." Watch full interview at -

ANI

18,784 views • 5 months ago

I was watching this Bloomberg video, notice how they subtly insert the fact that this woman was born into the “lowest caste” in “India’s social hierarchy,” even if it’s irrelevant to the story. Keep in mind, this is not accidental—it’s a calculated effort to reinforce the narrative that the “caste system” defines India. The goal is to shape American perceptions, convincing their white audience that Indians are inherently bigoted and perpetuate “caste oppression.” What they deliberately ignore is that India has gigantic welfare programs exclusively designed to benefit the same “lower caste” communities, funded largely by “upper-caste” taxpayers. (Over $35 Billion/year spent for SC/ST welfare) They also avoid addressing how Tamil Nadu, despite being considered one of the most socially progressive states, has some of the highest levels of caste-based discrimination, because most of it is lower caste on lower caste violence, and there is no way to drag "upper castes" into it and start caste-baiting. At the end of the day, the suffering of these women stems from poverty & economic hardship, not caste. It deflects from deeper issues like the failures of Nehruvian socialist policies, as well as, how communist activists have annihilated manufacturing and industries, which is the real driver of poverty. Instead of acknowledging the nuances or the economic roots of poverty, they simplify the issue into a black-and-white story of Oppressors Vs Victims, attempting to dehumanize Indians as a whole. The core objective of all this is to lay groundwork for justifying their future political interference when India tries to stand up to America. They have been demonizing China for decades; now it’s India’s turn. Recognize the propaganda, call it out, and spread the word.

@drishtadyumna

15,189 views • 1 year ago

Big Cleanup in Bengal 📌500,000 illegal OBC certificates suspended 📌CPIM, TMC unconstitutionally added around 161 castes in OBC list. Of these only 4 were Hindu castes; rest 157 were all Muslim. 📌But 20,000 Muslims who got jobs via this order to stay, says SC Sourav Kumar Mishra explains how the CPM and then TMC tried everything to mariginalise Bengali Hindus and turn Bengal into Bangladesh. In 2010, when the CPIM government realised they were going to lose the 2011 assembly elections, the communists added 42 castes into the OBC list. This was done unconstitutionally without any surveys. Among these 42 castes, there was only one Hindu caste; the rest 41 were Muslim. In 2011, when Mamata Banerjee's TMC came to power, instead of cancelling the order, they doubled down and added 77 castes in the OBC list. Of these, just 2 were Hindu castes, and 75 were Muslim. Later, the TMC added another 42 castes into the OBC list. Of these, just 3 were Hindus, the rest were all Muslim. Ordinary citizens like Amal Chandra Das and Nilmadhab Karmakar filed PILs to protect the rights of Hindus. The High Court cancelled the new additions into the OBC list. In response, the TMC decided to waste the public's money and appealed in the Supreme Court. The apex court upheld the HC order. However, the Supreme Court gave respite to 20,000 (99% Muslim) employees who got jobs via the CPIM and TMC's illegal orders. That means 20,000 deserving Hindus were deprived of Government jobs because of the Muslim appeasement policy of the CPIM and TMC. These 20,000 undeserving employees who illegally entered the system continue to hold their jobs.

Rakesh Krishnan Simha

52,552 views • 1 month ago