Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
New video on format string vulnerabilities. It's the classic printf(user) bug. An attacker can read and write almost any memory in the process, from a single print statement. I walk through all of it in a live GDB session. Leaking the stack with %p, turning %n into an arbitrary... show more
12,610 просмотров • 7 дней назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 8

acidburn7 дней назад
java devs discovering printf can spawn a shell

tetsuo7 дней назад
I'll cover Apache Log4j next. 😂

Pitchfork & Torch ♞7 дней назад
Hello world?

BullBear.News7 дней назад
Using percent n for arbitrary write is a clean demonstration of classic memory corruption risks.

Path of Totality7 дней назад
Quite educational thanks

Robi7 дней назад
Idź mi stąd w pizdu -90 ty kurwa pajacu .

Ricci Research7 дней назад
Beautiful illustration of the real lesson: the bug isn't a missing bounds check, it's an API where the safe call and the catastrophic one differ by four characters. Compilers have warned about this for twenty years and it still ships, which says more about how warnings get triaged than about the developers.

why7 дней назад
The single-print-statement angle really shows why printf(user) is far more dangerous than a simple crash.

