Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Newly surfaced documentary footage from inside an Israeli police command center provides raw, real-time insight into the opening hours of the October 7 attack. Captured before official reporting and media censorship were established, the unedited video reveals how officials reacted during the chaos. As more original documentation comes to...

21,439 просмотров • 2 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

EXCLUSIVE — Video captures disputed statement during January 24 ICE protest Video recorded during a January 24 protest captures a moment that raises questions about how allegations of political violence are documented on scene and later characterized in local news reporting. In raw, unedited video recorded at Elizabeth Caruthers Park, a background voice can be heard saying, “The guy in the blue shirt punched Tommy.” The statement is partially obscured by crowd noise but remains audible in the footage. The voice appears to belong to Jennifer Singh (Jennifer Singh), a reporter for KATU who joined the station last fall and was present at the scene. The statement appears to reference Thomas Allen (Tommyboi4209), a counter-protester whom oceanplot recorded being followed by a dozen or more people for much of the protest as it moved through the park. Read in context, the background statement alleges that Allen was struck by another individual. Video from the same period shows Allen being closely trailed by members of the crowd, as well as a man wearing a blue shirt running aggressively toward him. The footage does not independently confirm that Allen was struck. In subsequent reporting attributed to Singh, the incident was characterized differently. KATU reported that “crews also observed a counter-protester identified as Thomas Allen pepper spraying at least three protesters, who seemingly attempted to keep him away from the rally,” and noted that Allen “was arrested by Portland Police in the past during other anti-ICE protests.” The report did not reference an allegation that Allen was struck and instead presented Allen primarily as the source of violence. Allegations of violence at political protests carry significant weight, particularly in a charged national climate where such claims can shape public perception and justify escalation. When on-scene statements are captured on video but later framed differently in broadcast reporting, questions arise about how real-time observations are translated into definitive public narratives. Accurate and complete characterization of these moments is critical to maintaining public trust and ensuring that claims of political violence are reported with appropriate context and care. oceanplot contacted Jennifer Singh for comment regarding the discrepancy between the statement captured on video and her subsequent reporting. She did not respond by publication time.

oceanplot

42,859 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: ISRAELI HOSTAGE EXPOSES DISTURBING ACCOUNT In a shocking revelation, Israeli hostage Yasmin Porat has raised disconcerting questions about the tragic events of October 7. The Testimony: In an exclusive interview, Porat disclosed that Israeli forces eliminated everyone, including hostages, amid heavy crossfire and tank shelling. Censorship Concerns and Unfiltered Truth: Porat's account mysteriously vanished from the "Haboker Hazeh" program, sparking questions of potential censorship. The full interview has also been completely censored off of all social media platforms and off of Kan's website. However, her unfiltered testimony has already resonated widely on social media. In her interviews, Porat reveals a shocking twist: Palestinian fighters treated the hostages humanely, offering them hope of a safe passage to Gaza, despite the chaos. The compassionate act stands in stark contrast to the chaos that unfolded. The captive group's relief was brutally disrupted as Israeli forces arrived, unleashing a storm of gunfire that wounded fighters and hostages alike. She said this about the Israeli forces to Israeli radio: "They eliminated everyone, including the hostages." Amid this revelation, questions arise about what truly transpired on October 7, shedding new light on a day marked by profound sorrow for both Israelis and Palestinians. The harrowing testimony of Yasmin Porat challenges the narrative, emphasizing the importance of a thorough, impartial investigation into the events of that fateful day. Source: Vox, Mondoweiss, Middle East Monitor, LN, & The Cradle

Mario Nawfal

8,078,497 просмотров • 2 лет назад

THE HANNIBAL DIRECTIVE HISTORY AND HOW IT WAS ACTIVATED DURING OCT. 7TH 🇮🇱🇵🇸 The Hannibal Directive, a controversial Israeli military policy introduced in 1986, was initially developed by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) in response to the capture of three soldiers by Hezbollah in Lebanon. Named after the Carthaginian general Hannibal, who chose death over capture, the directive aimed to prevent the abduction of Israeli soldiers by authorizing the use of maximum force, even if it risked the lives of the captured soldiers themselves. Drafted by Northern Command leaders following a series of costly prisoner exchanges—viewed as unfavorable to Israel—the policy reflected a strategic preference for thwarting enemy captures over preserving the lives of hostages, prioritizing national security and deterrence over individual safety. Kept secret for years under military censorship, the directive emerged from a context of asymmetric warfare, where captured soldiers could be leveraged for significant political concessions, as seen in exchanges like the 1985 Ahmad Jibril deal. Over time, its use sparked ethical debates, with critics arguing it violated the IDF’s moral code, leading to its official revocation in 2016 by then-Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot, though questions lingered about whether it was ever fully abandoned. On October 7, 2023, during Hamas’s attack on southern Israel, evidence suggests the Hannibal Directive was reactivated and expanded beyond its original scope. As Palestinian fighters breached Israeli borders, targeting military bases and settlements, the IDF faced chaos and uncertainty about the scale of abductions. Reports from Israeli media, including a detailed Haaretz investigation, indicate that the directive was invoked as early as 7:18 a.m. at the Erez crossing, with orders to use drones, helicopters, and tanks to prevent vehicles—potentially carrying Israeli captives—from returning to Gaza. A blanket order at 11:22 a.m. stated, “Not a single vehicle can return to Gaza,” implying a willingness to sacrifice civilians and soldiers alike to foil Hamas’s objectives. Testimonies from survivors, such as those from Kibbutz Be’eri, where tank shells killed hostages, and accounts of helicopter fire on fleeing civilians, align with admissions from former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant in 2025, who confirmed its “tactical” use in some areas. Video: Stew Peters Network

Kacee Allen

75,165 просмотров • 1 год назад