正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Newt Gingrich says Democrats just pulled off a DOUBLE NEGATIVE with this shutdown. He’s been in politics for over 45 years, but he says what Democrats are doing at the moment is one of the DUMBEST moves he’s ever witnessed. Things could not look more bleak: “This may be...

VigilantFox's profile picture

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,970,960 subscribers

564,122 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治财经喜剧
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Newt Gingrich bluntly explains why the “Schumer Shutdown” is going to BACKFIRE on Democrats. Listen closely to these words of wisdom. Democrats couldn’t write a worse playbook than this. “There are two things the American people feel about this shutdown:” 1.) They do not want increased spending. 2.) They do not want the government closed. “So what do you have? You have the Schumer shutdown, where Chuck gets up and says, ‘I’m going to close the government to get more money.’ Now, that means he’s on the wrong side of BOTH issues.”
0:28

Newt Gingrich bluntly explains why the “Schumer Shutdown” is going to BACKFIRE on Democrats. Listen closely to these words of wisdom. Democrats couldn’t write a worse playbook than this. “There are two things the American people feel about this shutdown:” 1.) They do not want increased spending. 2.) They do not want the government closed. “So what do you have? You have the Schumer shutdown, where Chuck gets up and says, ‘I’m going to close the government to get more money.’ Now, that means he’s on the wrong side of BOTH issues.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

438,498 次观看 • 10 个月前

Newt Gingrich blasts Democrats over the looming Schumer shutdown: "This is insanity. From the work we do at America’s New Majority Project, we know there are two things the American people feel about this shutdown. One, they do not want increased spending. Two, they do not want the government closed. So what do you have? You have the Schumer shutdown—where Chuck gets up and says he’s going to close the government to get more money. That means he is on the wrong side of both issues. I think Schumer and Jeffries are totally out of touch with America."
1:16

Newt Gingrich blasts Democrats over the looming Schumer shutdown: "This is insanity. From the work we do at America’s New Majority Project, we know there are two things the American people feel about this shutdown. One, they do not want increased spending. Two, they do not want the government closed. So what do you have? You have the Schumer shutdown—where Chuck gets up and says he’s going to close the government to get more money. That means he is on the wrong side of both issues. I think Schumer and Jeffries are totally out of touch with America."

Sean Hannity 🇺🇸

224,528 次观看 • 10 个月前

Rep. Roy on #SchumerShutdown: “Yesterday, Newt Gingrich (Newt Gingrich) said something that I thought was very important. He pointed out that the American people do not like additional government spending and that they're not fond of government shutdowns. Democrats are walking to a trap in which they're doing both. They're shutting down the government to spend more money.”
1:03

Rep. Roy on #SchumerShutdown: “Yesterday, Newt Gingrich (Newt Gingrich) said something that I thought was very important. He pointed out that the American people do not like additional government spending and that they're not fond of government shutdowns. Democrats are walking to a trap in which they're doing both. They're shutting down the government to spend more money.”

Rep. Chip Roy Press Office

13,895 次观看 • 10 个月前

Bill O’Reilly forces Stephen A. Smith to RETREAT with one clean shot at the Democrats’ shutdown strategy. Smith insisted the Democrats deployed a legitimate tactic that just “didn’t work” this time, but when O’Reilly pushed back, he instantly backed down and went quiet. SMITH: “The fact is, there have been plenty of times where there are things that have hurt the American people. But from a political perspective, if you see it as something that strategically could position somebody to be in a better position than they were before employing that strategy, you’d at least acknowledge, ‘Hey, they tried. It didn’t work.’ But that’s how it goes because it’s the world of politics.” I’ve seen you say that on many, many occasions.” O’REILLY: “No, I wouldn’t. I would say—” SMITH: “Yes, you have!” O’REILLY: “As an American patriot… I would say if your strategy is to win a political battle, but you’re hurting millions of Americans in the process, GET A NEW STRATEGY.” SMITH: “Okay.”
0:45

Bill O’Reilly forces Stephen A. Smith to RETREAT with one clean shot at the Democrats’ shutdown strategy. Smith insisted the Democrats deployed a legitimate tactic that just “didn’t work” this time, but when O’Reilly pushed back, he instantly backed down and went quiet. SMITH: “The fact is, there have been plenty of times where there are things that have hurt the American people. But from a political perspective, if you see it as something that strategically could position somebody to be in a better position than they were before employing that strategy, you’d at least acknowledge, ‘Hey, they tried. It didn’t work.’ But that’s how it goes because it’s the world of politics.” I’ve seen you say that on many, many occasions.” O’REILLY: “No, I wouldn’t. I would say—” SMITH: “Yes, you have!” O’REILLY: “As an American patriot… I would say if your strategy is to win a political battle, but you’re hurting millions of Americans in the process, GET A NEW STRATEGY.” SMITH: “Okay.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

441,050 次观看 • 9 个月前

This is the FIRST time in HISTORY that any party has chosen to CLOSE the government down over a CLEAN CR —but the Democrats did just that. 34 days ago, the House passed a totally clean, totally nonpartisan, good faith CR — Democrats have kept the government CLOSED because they REFUSE to vote for it. Do the right thing and OPEN the government.
0:50

This is the FIRST time in HISTORY that any party has chosen to CLOSE the government down over a CLEAN CR —but the Democrats did just that. 34 days ago, the House passed a totally clean, totally nonpartisan, good faith CR — Democrats have kept the government CLOSED because they REFUSE to vote for it. Do the right thing and OPEN the government.

Speaker Mike Johnson

356,574 次观看 • 10 个月前

Mark Zuckerberg on why he prefers to recruit people directly out of college In this interview from 2005, a 21-year-old Mark Zuckerberg is asked what he looks for in a new hire. There’s two things, he says. “Number one is raw intelligence. You can hire someone who has been doing software engineering for 10 years, and if they’ve been doing it for 10 years, that’s probably what they’ll be doing for the rest of their life. That’s cool — there are some things that that person can do and they’re definitely useful in an organization and can do a lot of stuff. But if you find someone whose raw intelligence exceeds theirs but has 10 years less experience, they can probably adapt and learn way quicker. Within a very short amount of time they’ll be able to do a lot of things that [the person with 10 years of experience] will never be able to do. So that’s the most important thing that I look for.” The second thing he looks for is alignment with what the company is trying to do: “People can be really smart or have skills that are directly applicable, but if they don’t really believe in it, then they’re not going to work hard or care enough to develop the relevant experience in order to succeed. The best people I’ve hired so far have been people who didn’t really have that much engineering experience. I hired a couple of electric engineers out of Stanford to do programming stuff, and they had very little programming experience going in, but they were really smart and really willing to go at it. The guy who just wrote photos was one of those guys, and if you’re willing to just do whatever it takes to get photos out, then you’re probably more valuable than someone who is just a career software engineer.” He concludes: “Those are the things I’m looking for and why I would rather recruit people out of college.” Video source: Stanford eCorner (2005)
1:50

Mark Zuckerberg on why he prefers to recruit people directly out of college In this interview from 2005, a 21-year-old Mark Zuckerberg is asked what he looks for in a new hire. There’s two things, he says. “Number one is raw intelligence. You can hire someone who has been doing software engineering for 10 years, and if they’ve been doing it for 10 years, that’s probably what they’ll be doing for the rest of their life. That’s cool — there are some things that that person can do and they’re definitely useful in an organization and can do a lot of stuff. But if you find someone whose raw intelligence exceeds theirs but has 10 years less experience, they can probably adapt and learn way quicker. Within a very short amount of time they’ll be able to do a lot of things that [the person with 10 years of experience] will never be able to do. So that’s the most important thing that I look for.” The second thing he looks for is alignment with what the company is trying to do: “People can be really smart or have skills that are directly applicable, but if they don’t really believe in it, then they’re not going to work hard or care enough to develop the relevant experience in order to succeed. The best people I’ve hired so far have been people who didn’t really have that much engineering experience. I hired a couple of electric engineers out of Stanford to do programming stuff, and they had very little programming experience going in, but they were really smart and really willing to go at it. The guy who just wrote photos was one of those guys, and if you’re willing to just do whatever it takes to get photos out, then you’re probably more valuable than someone who is just a career software engineer.” He concludes: “Those are the things I’m looking for and why I would rather recruit people out of college.” Video source: Stanford eCorner (2005)

Startup Archive

54,696 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: Senate Leader John Thune just ADMITTED that the Democrats may nuke the filibuster when they re-take power! But he doesn't have the votes to do it with a 53-seat Republican majority. We SHOULD NUKE IT! We are basically just going to be SITTING DUCKS waiting for Democrats to do it THUNE: "I don't disagree that there is a possibility. If the Democrats ever get the House, the Senate, and the White House, get unified control of the government, they might try to do that." "We don't know the answer to that. It's hypothetical. But what I will tell you is there are not the votes to nuke the filibuster in the United States Senate today." "It has protected Republicans through the years, conservative principles and priorities, by requiring a supermajority to get things done in the United States Senate. That's the way the founders designed it."
1:08

🚨 BREAKING: Senate Leader John Thune just ADMITTED that the Democrats may nuke the filibuster when they re-take power! But he doesn't have the votes to do it with a 53-seat Republican majority. We SHOULD NUKE IT! We are basically just going to be SITTING DUCKS waiting for Democrats to do it THUNE: "I don't disagree that there is a possibility. If the Democrats ever get the House, the Senate, and the White House, get unified control of the government, they might try to do that." "We don't know the answer to that. It's hypothetical. But what I will tell you is there are not the votes to nuke the filibuster in the United States Senate today." "It has protected Republicans through the years, conservative principles and priorities, by requiring a supermajority to get things done in the United States Senate. That's the way the founders designed it."

Eric Daugherty

454,651 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨NEW: David Friedberg has a direct message for Democratic Party "The Democratic party has an opportunity to stand up and say 'We don't want things like regulatory capture, or pork, or inside stuff going on...they can have all that and still align with increasing efficiency in Government. Efficiency in Government should not be a party issue. By allowing the Republicans to say 'We're for efficient government,' it implies that the Democrats are the opposite of that saying, 'We're for *inefficient government.' If the Democrats want to win this they can take this message and say we're for *more* efficient government and the way we're going to do it is by getting rid of regulatory capture, deals, etc. There's an opportunity for the Democrats to stand up and take the country in the direction that we *all* as Americans need it to go to, which is to have a sustainable federal Government. That's going to require some degree of fiscal conservatism and action, but they can take a different point of view on how they do it and have core beliefs around that." david friedberg The All-In Podcast
1:14

🚨NEW: David Friedberg has a direct message for Democratic Party "The Democratic party has an opportunity to stand up and say 'We don't want things like regulatory capture, or pork, or inside stuff going on...they can have all that and still align with increasing efficiency in Government. Efficiency in Government should not be a party issue. By allowing the Republicans to say 'We're for efficient government,' it implies that the Democrats are the opposite of that saying, 'We're for *inefficient government.' If the Democrats want to win this they can take this message and say we're for *more* efficient government and the way we're going to do it is by getting rid of regulatory capture, deals, etc. There's an opportunity for the Democrats to stand up and take the country in the direction that we *all* as Americans need it to go to, which is to have a sustainable federal Government. That's going to require some degree of fiscal conservatism and action, but they can take a different point of view on how they do it and have core beliefs around that." david friedberg The All-In Podcast

Autism Capital 🧩

93,886 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent SLAMMED the Democrats over their plan to shut down the government: "What's not good for this economy is this government shutdown. I don't know what Democrats are thinking here because they're going to own it." "The Democrats are in disarray; they're flailing, and this is the best they can do. If they want to take us into a shutdown, they're going to own it!"
0:38

🚨Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent SLAMMED the Democrats over their plan to shut down the government: "What's not good for this economy is this government shutdown. I don't know what Democrats are thinking here because they're going to own it." "The Democrats are in disarray; they're flailing, and this is the best they can do. If they want to take us into a shutdown, they're going to own it!"

Gunther Eagleman™

611,285 次观看 • 1 年前

Angry Democrat caller ERUPTS live on C-SPAN, torches Democrats over govt shutdown — announces he’s LEAVING the party. “I’m a Democrat, but I don’t understand what the party is doing… They’re holding out because THEY DON’T LIKE THE ORANGE MAN IN OFFICE. “So why are they blaming the other side when they’re the ones that have to come to the table and do the votes? They have to vote the right way to open the government and make sure that everybody has their checks and is getting paid. “And I think it’s kind of cruel to actually sit back and not participate because you don’t feel like the other party is doing what you want them to do. “There’s a trans section in there as well. They want to give money to afford trans surgeries for young kids. “And all this stuff that the Democrats have now gone into, which I am nowhere near. In fact, I think I’m going to be LEAVING the Democrat Party because this happens too often where they’re blaming the opposite party when they know they can do the right thing. “They need to do the right thing and reopen this government instead of keeping it shut down. Like they’re hijacking the American people. I’ve seen it before. We’ve seen them vote the right way when they’re in power, so why the hell can’t they vote the right way when they’re not in power? “So get this government back open. Get the American people what they deserve. And this is basically a Schumer shutdown. From what I’ve seen, from what I’ve been watching on C-SPAN, what they show [is] the Democrats whining and crying and blaming. That’s what I see.” The caller’s rant clearly left the C-SPAN host unamused. “All right, Jason,” she said before moving on to the next caller.
2:12

Angry Democrat caller ERUPTS live on C-SPAN, torches Democrats over govt shutdown — announces he’s LEAVING the party. “I’m a Democrat, but I don’t understand what the party is doing… They’re holding out because THEY DON’T LIKE THE ORANGE MAN IN OFFICE. “So why are they blaming the other side when they’re the ones that have to come to the table and do the votes? They have to vote the right way to open the government and make sure that everybody has their checks and is getting paid. “And I think it’s kind of cruel to actually sit back and not participate because you don’t feel like the other party is doing what you want them to do. “There’s a trans section in there as well. They want to give money to afford trans surgeries for young kids. “And all this stuff that the Democrats have now gone into, which I am nowhere near. In fact, I think I’m going to be LEAVING the Democrat Party because this happens too often where they’re blaming the opposite party when they know they can do the right thing. “They need to do the right thing and reopen this government instead of keeping it shut down. Like they’re hijacking the American people. I’ve seen it before. We’ve seen them vote the right way when they’re in power, so why the hell can’t they vote the right way when they’re not in power? “So get this government back open. Get the American people what they deserve. And this is basically a Schumer shutdown. From what I’ve seen, from what I’ve been watching on C-SPAN, what they show [is] the Democrats whining and crying and blaming. That’s what I see.” The caller’s rant clearly left the C-SPAN host unamused. “All right, Jason,” she said before moving on to the next caller.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

73,192 次观看 • 10 个月前

The biggest mistake I see people make when they start carnivore is the same mistake I made. Trying to do everything perfectly from day one. That is not a plan. That is a setup for failure. Here is what actually works. Stop trying to be perfect and start adding in the good things. More meat. More eggs. More real food. That is it. Something really cool happens when you do that. The more good things you add in, the less room there is for the things you are trying to crowd out. You are not white knuckling it. You are not depriving yourself. You are just filling your plate with better and better things until there is no space left for the rest. Progress is not just good enough. Progress IS the goal. You do not have to be perfect to change your life. You just have to start. 👑
0:30

The biggest mistake I see people make when they start carnivore is the same mistake I made. Trying to do everything perfectly from day one. That is not a plan. That is a setup for failure. Here is what actually works. Stop trying to be perfect and start adding in the good things. More meat. More eggs. More real food. That is it. Something really cool happens when you do that. The more good things you add in, the less room there is for the things you are trying to crowd out. You are not white knuckling it. You are not depriving yourself. You are just filling your plate with better and better things until there is no space left for the rest. Progress is not just good enough. Progress IS the goal. You do not have to be perfect to change your life. You just have to start. 👑

Queen of Carni

11,923 次观看 • 5 个月前

Democrats and their mainstream media say Elon Musk has taken over our Government and is doing whatever he wants Does this sound like someone who is power hungry and taking over? Elon Musk “Things I wanna be clear is like, I am looking for feedback. So it's not like I'm just going open loop here and doing whatever I want to do. I kind of wanna know what, what do the people want and what should we do? And, and then do it — as opposed to me just deciding on my own. But we also want to have extreme transparency, so like no shady back room deals or whatever, everything done in open total exposure. Like you can see the mistakes that are made, the good things that are done. You can comment on it, you can, you know, raise concerns. This is, we, we want to transparent, open government feedback, loop engaged. Transparency is key. Let's make decisions together, not in the shadows.“
0:43

Democrats and their mainstream media say Elon Musk has taken over our Government and is doing whatever he wants Does this sound like someone who is power hungry and taking over? Elon Musk “Things I wanna be clear is like, I am looking for feedback. So it's not like I'm just going open loop here and doing whatever I want to do. I kind of wanna know what, what do the people want and what should we do? And, and then do it — as opposed to me just deciding on my own. But we also want to have extreme transparency, so like no shady back room deals or whatever, everything done in open total exposure. Like you can see the mistakes that are made, the good things that are done. You can comment on it, you can, you know, raise concerns. This is, we, we want to transparent, open government feedback, loop engaged. Transparency is key. Let's make decisions together, not in the shadows.“

Wall Street Apes

155,292 次观看 • 1 年前

Former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss has an dire warning about Democrats “We're not dealing with a load of social Democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their aims are.” “You just can't win. And this is what Donald Trump understands, perhaps uniquely in the Western world. I think there are others who have taken on the deep state. You might point to Victor Orban, you might point to Bukele or Melaye. But really, Donald Trump to me is the playbook of how you need to behave because a lot of people in politics think Because it was the case in the 70s, 80s, that you could reason with the opposition, you could find a compromise, you could be bipartisan, you could persuade people, you could sell it in the media, you could roll the pitch, that that strategy can be adopted now. And I think they're wrong because the opposition have changed. We're not dealing with a load of social democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their aims are.” Again, this is from the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom
0:59

Former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss has an dire warning about Democrats “We're not dealing with a load of social Democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their aims are.” “You just can't win. And this is what Donald Trump understands, perhaps uniquely in the Western world. I think there are others who have taken on the deep state. You might point to Victor Orban, you might point to Bukele or Melaye. But really, Donald Trump to me is the playbook of how you need to behave because a lot of people in politics think Because it was the case in the 70s, 80s, that you could reason with the opposition, you could find a compromise, you could be bipartisan, you could persuade people, you could sell it in the media, you could roll the pitch, that that strategy can be adopted now. And I think they're wrong because the opposition have changed. We're not dealing with a load of social democrats who just want to raise taxes a bit and spend more on public spending. We're dealing with people who want to destroy Western civilization. This is what their aims are.” Again, this is from the former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

Wall Street Apes

905,507 次观看 • 7 个月前

The only things Senate Democrats have to show for the last two years are causing the two longest government shutdowns in history and opposing measures to advance safe, secure elections. I don’t know about Chuck Schumer, but that’s not a record I’d be proud of.
1:15

The only things Senate Democrats have to show for the last two years are causing the two longest government shutdowns in history and opposing measures to advance safe, secure elections. I don’t know about Chuck Schumer, but that’s not a record I’d be proud of.

Senator Bill Hagerty

14,428 次观看 • 11 天前

"While Democrats are bending over backward to pretend that the force the vote strategy is emblematic of a Republican pty in disarray, what this moment really shows is how fully controlled by the corporate Democratic party progressive Democrats really are"
7:13

"While Democrats are bending over backward to pretend that the force the vote strategy is emblematic of a Republican pty in disarray, what this moment really shows is how fully controlled by the corporate Democratic party progressive Democrats really are"

Briahna Joy Gray

792,982 次观看 • 3 年前

"This is not a conservative party. It's a nihilistic party ... This is mind-bending to some people, in that, people I think who are younger, may not understand it, but the conservative party today is the Democratic Party. Because as Democrats, we are trying to preserve, to conserve the things that we have created."
1:08

"This is not a conservative party. It's a nihilistic party ... This is mind-bending to some people, in that, people I think who are younger, may not understand it, but the conservative party today is the Democratic Party. Because as Democrats, we are trying to preserve, to conserve the things that we have created."

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸

50,198 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 Hasan Piker and Chris Rabb Lay Out the DSA Playbook for Using the Democratic Ballot Line Against the Party This clip is a clean look at the socialist left’s bizarre frenemy relationship with the Democratic Party. Hasan opens by attacking Democrats directly. They “don’t love you,” “don’t care about you,” and “don’t care about your interests.” But he does not tell people to leave the party. He tells them the Democratic primary is the battlefield because it “determines the trajectory of the Democratic Party.” Then Chris Rabb picks up the thread. Rabb says he “identif[ies] as a democratic socialist,” but is “running as a Democrat because the system creates this narrowness.” In other words, the Democratic label is not the identity. It is the vehicle. Rabb makes that even clearer moments later. He says Democrats may share the same label “in this moment,” but “we are very different.” Then he tells voters, “You don’t have to love the Democratic Party to vote for me. I do not care because I’m not here for the party. I’m here for the people.” The result is a strange but increasingly effective hostile partnership. The DSA needs the Democratic ballot line because third-party politics is a dead end. The Democratic Party keeps absorbing candidates who openly reject it. And over time, that one-way arrangement lets the socialist left take more ground inside the party while still pretending to be outsiders. But what do Democrats actually get out of this arrangement?
2:51

🚨 Hasan Piker and Chris Rabb Lay Out the DSA Playbook for Using the Democratic Ballot Line Against the Party This clip is a clean look at the socialist left’s bizarre frenemy relationship with the Democratic Party. Hasan opens by attacking Democrats directly. They “don’t love you,” “don’t care about you,” and “don’t care about your interests.” But he does not tell people to leave the party. He tells them the Democratic primary is the battlefield because it “determines the trajectory of the Democratic Party.” Then Chris Rabb picks up the thread. Rabb says he “identif[ies] as a democratic socialist,” but is “running as a Democrat because the system creates this narrowness.” In other words, the Democratic label is not the identity. It is the vehicle. Rabb makes that even clearer moments later. He says Democrats may share the same label “in this moment,” but “we are very different.” Then he tells voters, “You don’t have to love the Democratic Party to vote for me. I do not care because I’m not here for the party. I’m here for the people.” The result is a strange but increasingly effective hostile partnership. The DSA needs the Democratic ballot line because third-party politics is a dead end. The Democratic Party keeps absorbing candidates who openly reject it. And over time, that one-way arrangement lets the socialist left take more ground inside the party while still pretending to be outsiders. But what do Democrats actually get out of this arrangement?

Stu Smith

264,867 次观看 • 3 个月前