Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Nick O’Neill says MicroStrategy didn’t start looking like a Ponzi until it introduced $STRC "It wasn’t a Ponzi at the beginning. It actually wasn’t until they introduced Stretch" "As long as the ATM is being used to pay dividend holders, then objectively the new investors that are buying are...

ShadooowOnX's profile picture

Shadooow

2,089 subscribers

61,071 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

MSTR IS A PONZI - DEBUNKED IN UNDER 4 MINUTES! I am predicting that now we have seen the "HOW ARE THEY GONNA PAY THE DIVIDENDS?!?!?" argument totally destroyed by Saylor and company, we will begin to see the nonsense Ponzi FUD start again. Unfortunately for the troglodytes out there, Strategy does not meet the definition of a Ponzi scheme. HATERS AND BEARS IN SHAMBLES:
3:58

MSTR IS A PONZI - DEBUNKED IN UNDER 4 MINUTES! I am predicting that now we have seen the "HOW ARE THEY GONNA PAY THE DIVIDENDS?!?!?" argument totally destroyed by Saylor and company, we will begin to see the nonsense Ponzi FUD start again. Unfortunately for the troglodytes out there, Strategy does not meet the definition of a Ponzi scheme. HATERS AND BEARS IN SHAMBLES:

Adam Livingston

47,656 views • 8 months ago

For years, the biggest knock on Saylor was that the whole thing was a Ponzi. Issue stock, buy Bitcoin, issue more stock to pay the dividend. Yesterday, he killed that argument for good by funding it with Bitcoin itself. There is no honest way to call Strategy a Ponzi anymore.
1:17

For years, the biggest knock on Saylor was that the whole thing was a Ponzi. Issue stock, buy Bitcoin, issue more stock to pay the dividend. Yesterday, he killed that argument for good by funding it with Bitcoin itself. There is no honest way to call Strategy a Ponzi anymore.

Joe Consorti

52,652 views • 1 month ago

JUST IN: Strive's Jeff Walton (Jeff Walton) responds to Coffeezilla calling $STRC a Ponzi scheme. "The difference between a Ponzi scheme and a capital management vehicle is that a Ponzi scheme doesn't have reserves. A capital management vehicle does." "Almost 100% of insurance claims paid out are funded by premiums they collect. Does that make an insurance company a Ponzi scheme?"
5:36

JUST IN: Strive's Jeff Walton (Jeff Walton) responds to Coffeezilla calling $STRC a Ponzi scheme. "The difference between a Ponzi scheme and a capital management vehicle is that a Ponzi scheme doesn't have reserves. A capital management vehicle does." "Almost 100% of insurance claims paid out are funded by premiums they collect. Does that make an insurance company a Ponzi scheme?"

BitcoinTreasuries.NET

50,105 views • 3 months ago

Australia’s Housing Ponzi Cannot Last - Top CEO Issues Dire Warning Australia’s housing market is now being described as a Ponzi scheme, and everyone’s in on it. Investors, banks, politicians and pretty much everyone else. House prices are completely detached from reality, but no one wants to do anything because the whole system depends on this endless, reckless growth. However, you can only push it so far before the entire housing market collapses.
13:08

Australia’s Housing Ponzi Cannot Last - Top CEO Issues Dire Warning Australia’s housing market is now being described as a Ponzi scheme, and everyone’s in on it. Investors, banks, politicians and pretty much everyone else. House prices are completely detached from reality, but no one wants to do anything because the whole system depends on this endless, reckless growth. However, you can only push it so far before the entire housing market collapses.

Biko Konstantinos

14,961 views • 6 months ago

There is a price to Donald Trump’s corruption, and you are the ones paying it. You’ll pay it at the pump for $4/gallon. You’ll pay it through his cryptocurrency ventures where he makes out like a bandit. You’ll pay for it when the Trump kids are all of a sudden investors in new defense companies that are winning billions of dollars in contracts from the defense department for untested weapons.
1:36

There is a price to Donald Trump’s corruption, and you are the ones paying it. You’ll pay it at the pump for $4/gallon. You’ll pay it through his cryptocurrency ventures where he makes out like a bandit. You’ll pay for it when the Trump kids are all of a sudden investors in new defense companies that are winning billions of dollars in contracts from the defense department for untested weapons.

Rahm Emanuel

10,839 views • 1 month ago

"Constipated." That is the word now being used for the private credit market. And it is exactly what this looks like. The private credit story is changing. For months it was framed as a liquidity problem. Investors trying to pull their money out. That is still a huge problem. BlackRock just had a couple of funds suffering big runs. But there is a bigger one. It is no longer just the investors who want out. It is the investors outside who no longer want in. And that is the much bigger story. Because the private credit boom was built on flows. Constant inflows from wealth managers, pensions, insurance companies, and the general public. That is how big it got. The machine has to keep moving. Money comes in. Loans get made. Funds grow. Redemptions get handled. Managers collect their fees. Everyone pretends it is calm because the marks are smooth and the exits are limited. Now the machine is reversing. Reuters reported US direct lending issuance in the three months ending May was down roughly 40% from the first quarter. Issuance to private-equity-backed borrowers dropped nearly 37%. Volume tied to leveraged buyouts fell about 34%. So this is no longer just a redemption story. The exits are clogged. New money is hesitant. Sellers will not cut prices, and buyers will not pay yesterday's valuations. Credit funds are handling redemptions. Leveraged loans are showing strain. And publicly traded BDCs are not rebounding, even as the broader market soars. So the question is no longer whether investors are still withdrawing. They are, and it is accelerating. It is not about the people inside who want out. It is about the people outside who no longer want in. That is the bigger problem. It pushes us deeper into stage two, and the odds of stage three go up from here.
2:11

"Constipated." That is the word now being used for the private credit market. And it is exactly what this looks like. The private credit story is changing. For months it was framed as a liquidity problem. Investors trying to pull their money out. That is still a huge problem. BlackRock just had a couple of funds suffering big runs. But there is a bigger one. It is no longer just the investors who want out. It is the investors outside who no longer want in. And that is the much bigger story. Because the private credit boom was built on flows. Constant inflows from wealth managers, pensions, insurance companies, and the general public. That is how big it got. The machine has to keep moving. Money comes in. Loans get made. Funds grow. Redemptions get handled. Managers collect their fees. Everyone pretends it is calm because the marks are smooth and the exits are limited. Now the machine is reversing. Reuters reported US direct lending issuance in the three months ending May was down roughly 40% from the first quarter. Issuance to private-equity-backed borrowers dropped nearly 37%. Volume tied to leveraged buyouts fell about 34%. So this is no longer just a redemption story. The exits are clogged. New money is hesitant. Sellers will not cut prices, and buyers will not pay yesterday's valuations. Credit funds are handling redemptions. Leveraged loans are showing strain. And publicly traded BDCs are not rebounding, even as the broader market soars. So the question is no longer whether investors are still withdrawing. They are, and it is accelerating. It is not about the people inside who want out. It is about the people outside who no longer want in. That is the bigger problem. It pushes us deeper into stage two, and the odds of stage three go up from here.

Jeffrey P. Snider

24,551 views • 2 months ago

WOW 🚨 Virginia Democrats just introduced a new bill that makes it ILLEGAL for state agencies to vet the clients nonprofits give money to READ THAT AGAIN Democrats are making it illegal to know where your tax money is being sent “Abigail Spanberger — There is literally a bill that makes it illegal for state agencies to actually demand that the 501C3s and the charitable organizations that they give money to vet their clients to make sure that the money is going to people that are actually eligible. Like, wait a second, you made it illegal for a state agency to make sure that the tax dollars it gives out actually goes to the people that are supposed to get it, only the qualified people? Yes, that is the bill right before the General Assembly”
1:54

WOW 🚨 Virginia Democrats just introduced a new bill that makes it ILLEGAL for state agencies to vet the clients nonprofits give money to READ THAT AGAIN Democrats are making it illegal to know where your tax money is being sent “Abigail Spanberger — There is literally a bill that makes it illegal for state agencies to actually demand that the 501C3s and the charitable organizations that they give money to vet their clients to make sure that the money is going to people that are actually eligible. Like, wait a second, you made it illegal for a state agency to make sure that the tax dollars it gives out actually goes to the people that are supposed to get it, only the qualified people? Yes, that is the bill right before the General Assembly”

Wall Street Apes

347,904 views • 7 months ago

Jeff Walton: "Is an insurance company a Ponzi scheme?" Coffeezilla: "No. They have business activities that are providing cash flow. They're taking on risk." Walton: "Insurance companies have capital and they're taking on risk to pay liability into the future. Almost 100% of the claims that get paid out on insurance company balance sheets is from premiums that they're collecting in the door. So under your definition, you would call an insurance company a Ponzi scheme." Coffeezilla: "No, no. They have real profits. They have real cash flows." Walton: "The profits are the assets that are protected on their balance sheet." Coffeezilla: "People are paying for products." Walton: "What's the product?"
3:04

Jeff Walton: "Is an insurance company a Ponzi scheme?" Coffeezilla: "No. They have business activities that are providing cash flow. They're taking on risk." Walton: "Insurance companies have capital and they're taking on risk to pay liability into the future. Almost 100% of the claims that get paid out on insurance company balance sheets is from premiums that they're collecting in the door. So under your definition, you would call an insurance company a Ponzi scheme." Coffeezilla: "No, no. They have real profits. They have real cash flows." Walton: "The profits are the assets that are protected on their balance sheet." Coffeezilla: "People are paying for products." Walton: "What's the product?"

TFTC

86,823 views • 3 months ago

Coffeezilla thinks that $STRC is going to fail because it's 11.5% yield is "Too good to be true" comparing it to the Terra Luna moment and described it as a "Ponzi Scheme". There's absolutely no substance to his claims because he doesn't understand it. He sees the headline interest return and then compares it to every other high yield return product but spectacularly misses the fact that this product is nothing like them. Saylor recently did an interview with Bankless and mentioned there were '3 types of people in the world - Optimists, Pessimists & Alarmists". Coffeezilla in this instance is an alarmist. He says that Strategy are 'not obligated to pay you the yield'. Correct....but it's clearly not in their interest to not pay the divided, so why would they not? As Saylor correctly says: "You need to have a stochastic view of the world. We could list 100 things that could go wrong, but the real threat is you get hit by a truck because you're not looking both ways while you cross the street." $STRC is the real deal. Anyone who has watched it closely over the past 8+ months will tell you that.
2:58

Coffeezilla thinks that $STRC is going to fail because it's 11.5% yield is "Too good to be true" comparing it to the Terra Luna moment and described it as a "Ponzi Scheme". There's absolutely no substance to his claims because he doesn't understand it. He sees the headline interest return and then compares it to every other high yield return product but spectacularly misses the fact that this product is nothing like them. Saylor recently did an interview with Bankless and mentioned there were '3 types of people in the world - Optimists, Pessimists & Alarmists". Coffeezilla in this instance is an alarmist. He says that Strategy are 'not obligated to pay you the yield'. Correct....but it's clearly not in their interest to not pay the divided, so why would they not? As Saylor correctly says: "You need to have a stochastic view of the world. We could list 100 things that could go wrong, but the real threat is you get hit by a truck because you're not looking both ways while you cross the street." $STRC is the real deal. Anyone who has watched it closely over the past 8+ months will tell you that.

David Lawrence

39,873 views • 4 months ago

Logan Paul says he spent $562,000 on a Michael Jordan signed court, discovered it wasn’t what he was told, and thinks he’s uncovered something shady that could rattle the sports memorabilia market “I bought an 8 foot by 8 foot piece of Chicago Bulls floor court that was supposedly used during the second three, Last Dance, signed by Michael Jordan” “Turns out it is not what they say it is, and they will say it is what they say it is, it is objectively not what they say it is. So the only way for me to not move forward and have to pay $562,000, because they were making me do it by this certain date, was to file an injunction, which made SportsCenter news. It’s like, hold on a second, let me inspect this item and verify its authenticity first. And I tried so hard to verify that this thing was what they said it was, and that it was used during the years of 1994 to either 98 or 99. I could not do it. It didn’t check out” “As this house of cards was falling down, I discovered that this is just the tip of the iceberg in items that have been authenticated and actually don’t have the proof that they are what they say they are.” “I believe I’m sitting on a story that is going to rattle the sports market to the core. There’s been some just shady fucked up shit that’s happened, and it appears that one company in particular said things were used or are things that they actually are not. That is my opinion”
2:28

Logan Paul says he spent $562,000 on a Michael Jordan signed court, discovered it wasn’t what he was told, and thinks he’s uncovered something shady that could rattle the sports memorabilia market “I bought an 8 foot by 8 foot piece of Chicago Bulls floor court that was supposedly used during the second three, Last Dance, signed by Michael Jordan” “Turns out it is not what they say it is, and they will say it is what they say it is, it is objectively not what they say it is. So the only way for me to not move forward and have to pay $562,000, because they were making me do it by this certain date, was to file an injunction, which made SportsCenter news. It’s like, hold on a second, let me inspect this item and verify its authenticity first. And I tried so hard to verify that this thing was what they said it was, and that it was used during the years of 1994 to either 98 or 99. I could not do it. It didn’t check out” “As this house of cards was falling down, I discovered that this is just the tip of the iceberg in items that have been authenticated and actually don’t have the proof that they are what they say they are.” “I believe I’m sitting on a story that is going to rattle the sports market to the core. There’s been some just shady fucked up shit that’s happened, and it appears that one company in particular said things were used or are things that they actually are not. That is my opinion”

Third

53,654 views • 15 days ago

"Stretch could stay below 100 for ten years, twenty years. They could hike the dividend, not change it, pause it, or cut it. But you continue to receive the dividend until they change that" Ryan Rasmussen on why Strategy investors are panicking over the wrong things "They sold 32 Bitcoin and everyone is freaking out. They bought over a thousand the next week. People are so focused on the fact they sold 32" "I think it was a good thing that they sold 32. When Bitcoin recovers to 80, 90, 100 plus k we will look back and think it was silly that everyone was freaking out"
0:50

"Stretch could stay below 100 for ten years, twenty years. They could hike the dividend, not change it, pause it, or cut it. But you continue to receive the dividend until they change that" Ryan Rasmussen on why Strategy investors are panicking over the wrong things "They sold 32 Bitcoin and everyone is freaking out. They bought over a thousand the next week. People are so focused on the fact they sold 32" "I think it was a good thing that they sold 32. When Bitcoin recovers to 80, 90, 100 plus k we will look back and think it was silly that everyone was freaking out"

The Wolf Of All Streets

101,757 views • 2 months ago

Kasparov: Putin’s real danger is that his own elite starts asking the Prigozhin question: what are we paying for? As long as the war paid, they stayed loyal. Now they are being forced to pay for a war that is not delivering the result they were promised. 4X
1:02

Kasparov: Putin’s real danger is that his own elite starts asking the Prigozhin question: what are we paying for? As long as the war paid, they stayed loyal. Now they are being forced to pay for a war that is not delivering the result they were promised. 4X

Tymofiy Mylovanov

54,532 views • 3 months ago

THIS IS THE PROBLEM!!! This is how retail investors are introduced to memecoins. They’re literally being taught to only buy new pairs under 10k and panic sell ass soon as possible before a possible 80% nuke happens. This is NOT the game to play. #crypto #fyp #trading #memecoins
2:48

THIS IS THE PROBLEM!!! This is how retail investors are introduced to memecoins. They’re literally being taught to only buy new pairs under 10k and panic sell ass soon as possible before a possible 80% nuke happens. This is NOT the game to play. #crypto #fyp #trading #memecoins

ImJustGroovy

18,818 views • 14 days ago

CryptoKaleo claims MicroStrategy is trapped in an endless cycle that is hurting its shareholders "They are diluting $MSTR holders directly to pay the bill for everything else." "They're buying the Bitcoin as a mask to be able to say, 'Hey, we're still buying Bitcoin,' but they're not increasing Bitcoin per share at all. For the longest time, that was the No. 1 metric." "They can't raise money through $STRC as long as it's trading this far below par... they can't tap that facility, and that was where they were raising the majority of their capital over the past year." "The real options left are dilution via either selling $MSTR or selling Bitcoin. Either way, both are hurting shareholders."
3:11

CryptoKaleo claims MicroStrategy is trapped in an endless cycle that is hurting its shareholders "They are diluting $MSTR holders directly to pay the bill for everything else." "They're buying the Bitcoin as a mask to be able to say, 'Hey, we're still buying Bitcoin,' but they're not increasing Bitcoin per share at all. For the longest time, that was the No. 1 metric." "They can't raise money through $STRC as long as it's trading this far below par... they can't tap that facility, and that was where they were raising the majority of their capital over the past year." "The real options left are dilution via either selling $MSTR or selling Bitcoin. Either way, both are hurting shareholders."

Fibonacci 🥷

57,821 views • 2 months ago

This Labour MP admits that there are "Native Brits and Non-Native Citizens." A good start. She also says that some groups are "seeking to rewrite the definition of Britishness as being based on ancestry alone." Right...Does she not realise that it was the British Nationality Acts of 1948 & 1981 that rewrote the definition of British to literally include anyone from anywhere in the world? The British People have ancestry from the British Isles dating back thousands of years. This is just a fact. Before mass-immigration, pre-1948, there was not a need to 'define Britishness'. Any definition that seeks to say 'anyone from anywhere in the world can be British' is genocidal as we are on the verge of becoming a minority in our homeland. Ancestry is everything. It is who we are as a People.
0:35

This Labour MP admits that there are "Native Brits and Non-Native Citizens." A good start. She also says that some groups are "seeking to rewrite the definition of Britishness as being based on ancestry alone." Right...Does she not realise that it was the British Nationality Acts of 1948 & 1981 that rewrote the definition of British to literally include anyone from anywhere in the world? The British People have ancestry from the British Isles dating back thousands of years. This is just a fact. Before mass-immigration, pre-1948, there was not a need to 'define Britishness'. Any definition that seeks to say 'anyone from anywhere in the world can be British' is genocidal as we are on the verge of becoming a minority in our homeland. Ancestry is everything. It is who we are as a People.

Lucy White

64,064 views • 1 month ago

People say “that’s not fair,” but often what they really mean is “my status feels diminished." People care deeply about fairness, especially when it comes to how material resources are distributed. But often the concern is not really about the resource itself. It is about something underneath it. People say they care about fairness, but what they are really asking is: do you respect me? Do you see me as equal? Are you granting me the status that matches how I see myself? Take a common example. You find out that others at your job, in the same role, are being paid more than you. You are still doing well. You are comfortable. By most objective standards, you are fine. But the moment you learn that your peers earn more, the reaction is immediate: something is wrong. This feels unfair. Now imagine your boss responds, “You’re already making good money. Relax.” That does not calm the situation. It makes it worse. Because the issue was never just the money. It was the signal the difference sends. The gap suggests that you are valued less, that you occupy a lower rung, even if your absolute income is high. The anger that follows is not about deprivation. It is about status. It is the feeling of being diminished, of being treated as less than others who are, in principle, your equals.
0:49

People say “that’s not fair,” but often what they really mean is “my status feels diminished." People care deeply about fairness, especially when it comes to how material resources are distributed. But often the concern is not really about the resource itself. It is about something underneath it. People say they care about fairness, but what they are really asking is: do you respect me? Do you see me as equal? Are you granting me the status that matches how I see myself? Take a common example. You find out that others at your job, in the same role, are being paid more than you. You are still doing well. You are comfortable. By most objective standards, you are fine. But the moment you learn that your peers earn more, the reaction is immediate: something is wrong. This feels unfair. Now imagine your boss responds, “You’re already making good money. Relax.” That does not calm the situation. It makes it worse. Because the issue was never just the money. It was the signal the difference sends. The gap suggests that you are valued less, that you occupy a lower rung, even if your absolute income is high. The anger that follows is not about deprivation. It is about status. It is the feeling of being diminished, of being treated as less than others who are, in principle, your equals.

Rob Henderson

20,838 views • 4 months ago

Is Social Security on the chopping block? Trump says no, but why is his genius buddy out there trashing the program as a Ponzi scheme? How can somebody be a genius and be so fundamentally wrong… Check out this fact check
10:33

Is Social Security on the chopping block? Trump says no, but why is his genius buddy out there trashing the program as a Ponzi scheme? How can somebody be a genius and be so fundamentally wrong… Check out this fact check

Christopher C. Cuomo

84,675 views • 1 year ago

“They are saying next year they will start paying tax. I told my fellow Christians, this tax we are the one to be paying it, but as far as Islamic people is concerned, they will never pay that tax.”
0:45

“They are saying next year they will start paying tax. I told my fellow Christians, this tax we are the one to be paying it, but as far as Islamic people is concerned, they will never pay that tax.”

Ozor Ndi Ozor

305,041 views • 8 months ago

Jimi Wanjigi: We should not pay our debt; it is not only logical, but it is the only way we don’t die. We are dying as a complete nation. When we say odious, it is illegal debt that is costing us. This year alone, it is going to be 91 percent of the taxes that we contribute to the government. This year alone, for every Kenyan, it is 40,000 shillings they are paying. For every working Kenyan, it is 120,000 shillings, 10,000 shillings a month, you are paying to something that you did not approve. If this debt was not passed by Parliament, why should we pay it? #CitizenSundayLive
2:15

Jimi Wanjigi: We should not pay our debt; it is not only logical, but it is the only way we don’t die. We are dying as a complete nation. When we say odious, it is illegal debt that is costing us. This year alone, it is going to be 91 percent of the taxes that we contribute to the government. This year alone, for every Kenyan, it is 40,000 shillings they are paying. For every working Kenyan, it is 120,000 shillings, 10,000 shillings a month, you are paying to something that you did not approve. If this debt was not passed by Parliament, why should we pay it? #CitizenSundayLive

Citizen TV Kenya

22,959 views • 3 months ago