Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

No one from the McAlbert Mafia can explain why John O'Keefe's phone shows him going up and down 3 flights of stairs between 12:22 and 12:24. It is the most important piece of evidence putting him inside Brian Albert's house, and they have no explanation for it. They say...

99,443 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Gregg Parenteau
Gregg Parenteauvor 1 Jahr

It was not explained but rather swept under the rug. Just like the friction between John and the Albert’s. Remember the picture they all took on John’s property? “The new gate they knew he had installed to keep people off his lawn—a clear effort to antagonize him.” See a post from Olivia about it. That should be emphasized at trial 2.

Profilbild von Your Daily Post
Your Daily Postvor 1 Jahr

Why did Two and a Half Men star Angus T. Jones call the show “filth” before leaving it in 2012? Since then, he’s left Hollywood, choosing to focus on his faith and community work. Here's the full story 👇

Profilbild von Sarah
Sarahvor 1 Jahr

John walked up or down the 2 flights and was carried up the 3rd. Guarino's story was such an unbelievable mess, I think he felt stupid telling it. 🤡

Profilbild von Liz
Lizvor 1 Jahr

Went up a couple ski lifts for the first time this weekend. Guess what it didn’t show…..me ascending any stairs

Profilbild von Barney’s Wife
Barney’s Wifevor 1 Jahr

Thats the time Ryan and Heather pulled up behind Karen and also said John wasn’t in the car also.

Profilbild von Mosttalkative
Mosttalkativevor 1 Jahr

And Karen’s phone did not register steps by going up & down ‘hilly’ streets

Profilbild von Yellow Cottage Tales
Yellow Cottage Talesvor 1 Jahr

How many times do we need to address it? We explain it, you don't want to hear. There is NO QUESTION, from multiple streams of data and evidence, that Karen and John were driving at that time. MULTIPLE. 1) GPS, which is highly accurate, shows exactly where they were during that period: on the road. 2) John entered the address into Waze at 12:20. They were still a four minute drive away. 3) Waze and GPS show them turning onto Fairview at 12:24:18 4) GPS shows John's phone never went in the house. 5) Ryan Nagel texted Julie that the ride was there to pick her up. This was at 12:23. He testified that they were about 2 minutes away, on Cedarcrest, when he texted her. They arrived right behind Karen and John. Why did the health up make this mistake? There can never be any exact explanation because the app is interpreting multiple data streams from several sensors in order to GUESS what the user is doing. Anyone can ask Chat GPT what sensors the app uses, and you'll see it's complicated. For example, it uses a barometric altimeter as PART of its way to determine change in elevation. It also has a gyroscope. It measures GPS, cell tower signals, and arm movements. In fact, arm movements are a key piece of data that it uses to interpret "stairs". So if you are sitting in the car talking with your phone in your hand, and you are someone that uses hand gestures, that can throw it off. The change in elevation from the location on Oakdale St where the app first detected stair ascending/descending to the location on Fairview is 30 feet. Three flights. In addition, as the engine finally warmed up, they would blast the heat, probably around Oakdale. Raising the temp inside the car from say 25 degrees to 75 degrees will create a change in barometric pressure...measured by the altimeter on the phone...of about 30 feet. Or three flights. Speed would be a factor two. My guess is that at the intersection of Oakdale and Cedarcrest, they stopped and argued, Karen wanting to go left and home, John wanting to go right and to Fairview. That stopping would impact the overall speed in those two minutes. They also would have driven slow on the dark street looking for the turn, which they missed. At the end of the day, we don't know and can't know for sure why an exercise app made a wrong interpretation. It's a very imperfect tool trying to interpret what you're doing based on a variety of sensors. On the other hand, GPS is designed by to put a missile through a mullah's window from a thousand miles away. GPS is highly accurate. And the margin of error on any GPS point is always measurable, second to second. So you can't try some argument about weak signal in the area. The exact signal strength is known second to second. If you want to make the weird argument that the clocks were off...again, other evidence defeats you. We have independent evidence from what time they passed the Jewish temple, and they were about a four minute drive away from Fairview. We have Waze AND the raw GPS. And we also have Ryan Nagel, who testified he texted his sister from Cedarcrest at 12:23. At that time, Karen and John were still driving...but according to the immortal Rich Green, they were ascending/descending stairs. Which was it, by the way, ascending or descending? Was he going up or down stairs? The app doesn't say. Which doesn't sound very accurate, does it.

Profilbild von Joe Donnelly
Joe Donnellyvor 1 Jahr

It's all "phone records show"... until you point out to them the omissions, deletions, lack of common sense, and whatever other nonsense they manufacture... then it's black holes, anti-physics, voodoo to try to explain why John was just simply in the house.

Profilbild von El Duderino
El Duderinovor 1 Jahr

Hilly streets 😂 I live by my Apple health on an obsessive level. The only thing Apple Health may get wrong is not enough flights logged and calories burned. It never logs bogus flights of stairs and never logs the proper calories burned

Profilbild von Max Settillo
Max Settillovor 1 Jahr

You know more about this than most, but my concern is that the CPD destroyed all forensic evidence tying B.A. & Co. to the murder they committed, leaving only a confession or direct witness implication pursuant to immunity grant, to see them convicted.

Profilbild von Megan Hatchett 🇺🇸
Megan Hatchett 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

This and they need to get Tristian’s phone records. I’m very curious about his communications during the night.

Ähnliche Videos

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin confirmed what Richard Green/the #KarenRead defense said in Trial 1, thus confirming that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview 3 minutes & 1 second before the Commonwealth’s GPS/location data points show: “[The monotonic clock] is not a clock that can be trusted to see when events occur.” Only the display time is accurate when determining when something actually happened. “All activity is related to that (the display) clock.” “You have to take the values that the monotonic clock provides and add or subtract different values, which are essentially offsets, to get the correct time.” That’s a major problem for the Commonwealth — because Whiffin’s entire Waze location analysis is built on the MONOTONIC TIMESTAMPS! And somehow, neither Whiffin nor Hank Brennan seems to grasp what just happened: They accidentally proved the defense’s theory! Specifically, because the Waze app runs on monotonic time programming and not the display time programming, the timestamps associated with the cached locations from Waze on John’s iPhone are 3 minutes and 1 second fast/ahead, or have a 181 second offset (see attached evidence exhibit from trial 1 with the specific conversions). This means that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview at approximately 12:21:37am, give or take, and not at 12:24:38am as the Commonwealth asserts, as Waze is based off of the monotonic timestamps, not the display clock timestamps. Consequently, this means John arrives at 34 Fairview BEFORE his Apple Health data recorded him taking flights of stairs, which didn’t first occur until 12:22:14am, therefore meaning that approximately 40 seconds after arriving at the house, John O’Keefe first began climbing some stairs. It suddenly becomes a lot harder for the Commonwealth to discredit the reliability of Apple Health data confirming John went inside the house when his location data also put him there. Why would the Commonwealth rely on the wrong timestamps when conducting their 15+ months after the fact GPS/location data analysis? Because it was right after the defense had first made public John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing flights of stairs climbed upon John’s arrival at 34 Fairview—thus establishing that he did in fact go inside the house. They needed to keep John out of the house to have any case, so they opted for discrediting the Apple Health data they so regularly rely upon in their criminal prosecutions, while deliberately only looking at John’s phone location data sourced from the one app that uses monotonic time programming without converting those timestamps to the display time (or subtracting the 3 mins. 1 second offset). By exploiting the incorrect monotonic timestamps of the cached Waze location data, the Commonwealth was able to claim that John’s phone location data showed he’d not yet arrived at 34 Fairview by the time his Apple Health data showed him climbing flights of stairs inside the house. To convert any of John O’Keefe’s Waze data that Whiffin presented into real time, you need to subtract 3 full minutes from each monotonic timestamp. So when Whiffin bizarrely testified that John was climbing stairs while driving down Oakdale at 12:22 AM? Yeah — that actually happened at 12:19 AM. And when he claimed Karen pulled up to 34 Fairview at 12:24 AM? That was really at 12:21 AM. Both times perfectly aligned with the Defense’s timeline. Not the Commonwealth’s. And Hank Brennan? Well, he’s got his expert, Ian Whiffin, casually confirming that John O’Keefe was walking into 34 Fairview at 12:21 AM, and climbing stairs at 12:22 AM. At this point, you really have to ask: Are the Commonwealth’s witnesses planning to leave anything for the Defense to rebut? Or are they just going to blow up their own case — one by one? Because this? This is getting insane. #IanWhiffin #Cellebrite #NorfolkCounty #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

179,619 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Officer #JohnOKeefe’s Cellphone Chain of Custody: Kerry Roberts testified—while simultaneously shaking her head “no”— that she picked up John’s cellphone, put it in her pocket, “and at some point one of the first responders asked if [she] had it, and [she] handed it over”. She could not recall who that first responder was, or whether they were a Police Officer, firefighter, or paramedic. Apple Health Movement Data show us that whoever had John O’Keefe’s cellphone climbed a flight of stairs at 6:43:31am. Additionally, between 6:26:17am & 6:43:19am, John’s cellphone is logging steps throughout (365 steps total). Therefore, these data seem to eliminate the possibility that Kerry gave John’s phone to a firefighter/EMT given they were in the ambulance driving to the hospital during this time & wouldn’t have been able to have been walking around or climbing stairs. The flight of stairs is also shown as being climbed/ascended before John arrived at the hospital around 6:49am, per his hospital bracelet. This means that Kerry most likely gave John’s phone to a Canton Police Officer. However, the CPD Officers have testified that while some of them went inside 34 Fairview (in the foyer area), none of them went up or down any stairs at any point inside the house. This fact alone suggests that either Kerry’s memory is unreliable—and perhaps she gave the cellphone to Jen McCabe, for instance—or that the CPD Officer who she gave the phone to then gave the it to someone inside Brian Albert’s house who climbed a flight of stairs with it at 6:43:31am. Alternatively, it could mean a CPD Officer did have John’s phone, but that they did in fact go down to the basement, or upstairs—contrary to their testimony. The other issue with Kerry’s statement is that it is directly contradicted by the fact that John’s phone started logging steps starting at 6:04:01am, nearly a minute after Jen McCabe’s phone GPS data show them arriving at 34 Fairview & finding his body. This was before Jen had even called 911, so there were no first responders at the scene, thus John’s body hadn’t been lifted from the ground yet exposing his phone—suggesting that it was with someone during that time, and not on the ground underneath him. What is curious though is the fact that there is nothing in Kerry Roberts’ interview w/ law enforcement on 1/29/22 about this critically important, material fact. Why? In fact, this seems to be one of the first times we’re hearing that Kerry is the one who found John’s phone. Let’s take a look at the sordid history regarding this matter, per the DA & its investigators’ own Court filings & public records. In the original cellphone chain of custody report filed on 2/4/2022, by Trooper Nicholas Guarino, it states: “On Saturday, January 29, 2022, Trooper Michael Proctor & Sgt. Yuri Bukhenik of the Norfolk District Attorney’s Office responded to an unattended death of John O'Keefe…at 34 Fairview Road in Canton…While on scene Tpr. Proctor secured O’Keefe’s cell phone & brought it to the Norfolk DA's Office for forensic analysis.” This was filed by Guarino, who is supposed to be the state’s computer & digital forensics expert, and was responsible for conducting the forensic analysis of John’s phone—surely, if anyone is going to get the precise whereabouts & custody information correct, then this would be that person, right? Despite this being under signed affidavit from DA Morrissey’s Office, that wouldn’t stop Morrissey from making a public video statement over a year & a half later, and only AFTER the defense had implicated Michael Proctor in planting evidence at the scene. Morrissey improperly tried evidence outside of the courtroom, directly contradicting the Court documents filed by HIS OFFICE to say that Proctor never went to the scene of 34 Fairview on the day of the incident & therefore couldn’t have planted evidence. Who had John’s cellphone? TO BE CONTINUED IN PART 2: JO’s PHONE #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

129,911 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

22,015 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten