正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

No runway? No problem The Ilmavoimat 🇫🇮 replaced runways with motorways during Kesäbaana 23 The NATO Ally regularly practices flying from austere locations so that aircraft can be rapidly fielded to different parts of Finland if neccessary

339,493 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Marc Casspir 的头像
Marc Casspir3 年前

@FinnishAirForce @NATO The #NATO Ally. Love that. Go 🇫🇮Suomi!

Lammis watching ruzzian empire go BOOM! 💥🗑🔚🐺 的头像
Lammis watching ruzzian empire go BOOM! 💥🗑🔚🐺3 年前

@FinnishAirForce @NATO That's standard for the Swedish JAS Gripen.

FinabelOfficial 的头像
FinabelOfficial3 年前

@FinnishAirForce @NATO Resourceful and ready! 🛫 The @FinnishAirForce's use of motorways as runways during Kesäbaana 23 showcases agility and preparedness. Essential for quick response scenarios. 🇫🇮✈️ #AerospaceReadiness #NATO

Karl Brodowsky 🇺🇦 的头像
Karl Brodowsky 🇺🇦3 年前

@minna_alander @FinnishAirForce @NATO Even normal 2-lane highways have short overwide sections, enough for 8 lanes, for a few kilometers length, to be used as temporary airfield. Example: E75 Rovaniemi - Ivalo. I have encountered such section on normal "non-motorway" highways in FI and SE, but nowhere else.

Heikki Hyttinen 的头像
Heikki Hyttinen3 年前

@FinnishAirForce @NATO That is one of the wider location, Hornets can land on roads almost anywhere with "enough" space

💚 @saudonym@snabelen.no 🌍 的头像
💚 @[email protected] 🌍3 年前

@FinnishAirForce @NATO Why did F-16 become the go-to western jet for Ukraine? F/A-18 and Gripen can both operate from motorways while F-16 demands a rather pristine runway.

Cristian T. 🇹🇩🇺🇦🇪🇺🇬🇧🇱🇷 的头像
Cristian T. 🇹🇩🇺🇦🇪🇺🇬🇧🇱🇷3 年前

@FinnishAirForce @NATO Finland is just a great military power...they know exactly who is they neighbour...

Sir Pip Oliver Fella 🇺🇦🇺🇸🇬🇧 💙 的头像
Sir Pip Oliver Fella 🇺🇦🇺🇸🇬🇧 💙3 年前

@FWN24h @FinnishAirForce @NATO Wouldn't work in the UK. Doubt there's a stretch long enough between roadworks to use as a runway.

Ed Sheeran Fan #105 的头像
Ed Sheeran Fan #1053 年前

@Caucasuswar @FinnishAirForce @NATO Imagine being stuck in stand still traffic bc a jet gotta take off the highway

Geri K 的头像
Geri K3 年前

@rawlimark @FinnishAirForce @NATO The US has started doing the same - a clip from last year showing an A-10 Warthog operating from a road in Michigan, USA.

相关视频

It is impossible for all NATO allies to be like Turkiye. Why? This is because there are some countries within the alliance that demand all kinds of assistance without assuming any operational responsibility or join missions, and some has been engaging in hostile actions and lobbying efforts for years with the aim of hindering the progress of other NATO countries. Not only has this country failed to make any financial or military contributions to NATO, but it is also attempting to weaken NATO from within in order to hinder the progress of countries like Turkiye—which carry out NATO missions under the NATO flag from the Baltic states to Eastern Europe. Let’s turn to the other aspect of the issue: the question of being like Turkiye. Just think about it this way; What business does a country that can’t even build a cheap commercial ship have in the same military alliance as one that can produce over 50 warships including destroyers, aircraft carriers and submarines at the same time? Can the perception of power and alliance ever be the same between a country capable of delivering thousands of AG munitions in a single shipment and a country that is delighted even to purchase just 30–40 AG munitions? Can a country with only 150-170 tanks that could be considered "modern" in its inventory be the same as one that is building facilities capable of delivering 100 tanks a year? Can there be a spirit of unity between a country that can develop and fly a 5th-generation fighter jet, and build facilities to produce 24+9 KAAN fighter jets/year and a country that, upon purchasing 20-25 4th-generation aircraft, immediately thinks of provocation, illegal actions and violating treaties for expanding ? As long as NATO fails to purge own parasites within its union, other countries will be forced to walk with a burden on their backs. Without these types of freeloaders—who don’t shoulder any of the alliance’s burdens—NATO could be a much stronger military organization. They're of no use—at least we'd be spared the harm they cause. Imagine flying side by side in battle with the incompetents who crashed a plane into parked fighter jets during a NATO exercise or caused a helicopter to crash into the sea in other exercise while flying at low altitude. May God grant us ease.

TR_tech

18,247 次观看 • 1 个月前