Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

"Nottingham Forest made more changes than Aston Villa did and no one said anything" "We played without Romero, Kulusevski, Kudus, Solanke, Simons, Maddison..." Roberto De Zerbi does not agree with criticism Aston Villa received for the rotated starting XI against Spurs 💬

1,934,196 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Michael Ballack on Chelsea signing Morgan Rogers for a reported £117m. 🗣️ “Chelsea are making the same mistake over and over again. Every transfer window, they walk into negotiations with a blank cheque, and then people wonder why the market has become completely ridiculous.” “Let’s be honest £117 million is a massive overpayment. Morgan Rogers is a talented footballer, but when you pay that kind of money, you’re talking about players who have dominated Europe for years, not players who are still proving themselves.” “This isn’t criticism of Morgan. It’s criticism of Chelsea’s decision-making. They’ve made Aston Villa’s job incredibly easy. Villa must be celebrating because they’ve negotiated a phenomenal deal.” “The worrying part is that Chelsea never seem to learn. Every time they overpay, the next club asks for even more. They’ve become the benchmark for inflated transfer fees, and everyone in football knows it.” “A transfer fee like this doesn’t just buy a player it creates impossible expectations. The first poor performance, the first missed chance, the first defeat… the £117 million price tag will be brought up immediately. Chelsea have put that burden on the player.” “Big clubs are supposed to dominate the market with intelligence, not desperation. If these reports are accurate, Chelsea haven’t outsmarted Aston Villa Aston Villa have outsmarted Chelsea. That’s the harsh reality.”

‏ْ

79,493 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

‼️🚨🔵PRESSER🔵🚨‼️ 🎙 Enzo Maresca’s Full Pre–Aston Villa Press Conference (Part 1 & 2) 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Delap and Estevão: “Both are available following their injuries.” ✅💪🏽 🔹 Enzo Maresca on if he would swap Morgan Rogers for Cole Palmer: “No. Because I love Cole ❤️ and Cole is my player.” 🔵 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Antoine Semenyo: “I’m focused on Aston Villa 🎯. Not on players who can arrive and leave. I’m in love with the squad we have.” 💙✨ 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Cole Palmer: “He is ready to play a full 90 minutes if needed.” ⏱️⚽ ⸻ 🔹 Enzo Maresca on any developments / the ‘worst 48 hours’ quote: “No, no, no. Before the Newcastle game, I already spoke about that. So nothing to add.” ❌🗣️ 🔹 Enzo Maresca on meetings with sporting directors / ownership: “Again, before the Newcastle game, in the press conference, I said that we had a meeting, that the relationship is good and we all focus on the Aston Villa game — the next game, the next game. So nothing to add.” 🤝🔵 🔹 Enzo Maresca on the players’ Christmas party: “Yeah, it was very good 🎄😊. Family time, players with their friends, with the kids. So it was a nice day, yeah.” 👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Chelsea’s training plan over Christmas: “After Newcastle they had two days off 😮‍💨. We trained yesterday, we train today, tomorrow off, and then Friday session and Saturday again.” 📆🏃🏽‍♂️ 🔹 Enzo Maresca on Pep giving players time off: “It’s Pep’s choice 🤝. He considers doing that. I think every manager probably thinks in a different way, but you have to respect different points of view. Is it about trusting the players to do the right thing on Christmas? No. I think it’s not about trust or not trust. I think also Pep trusts the players — just in a different way.” 🧠⚽ 🔹 Enzo Maresca on being in the stands vs Aston Villa: “Yes. In almost 100 games, I’ve been suspended three times 😅. One for celebration 🎉, and two times for yellow cards 🟨. So yeah, unfortunately I will be on the stand, but Willy [Caballero] is there, Danny [Walker] is there, the coaching staff is there. Does it affect the way I prepare, in terms of getting my messages to the players? No, no.” 🏟️📣 🔹 Enzo Maresca on facing Aston Villa: “It will be a very tough game for us ⚔️. We will have to be at our best because Aston Villa are playing very well. They have a clear way of playing and they are very organised both on and off the ball. They are full of confidence in this moment 🔥, but we are at home 🏠 and we will be trying to get the three points as we always do. We will work hard and continue to grow.” 📈💙

Miki Djan

29,957 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

🚨David Ornestein 🗣️ “Chelsea were willing to pay it, and the deal was completed incredibly quickly. An agreement was reached owner-to-owner, which is becoming an interesting dynamic in some of these transfers. “We saw it with Manchester City, Elliot Anderson and Nottingham Forest. The people at the very top are starting to step in, above sporting directors and other executives, to get these deals moving and completed. “Chelsea made an offer of £117 million.” “Why £117 million? Just to make it the highest? Take it £1 million above the other deal?” “That’s what it is.” “And all of it is performance-related?” “Not to my knowledge. It’s guaranteed.” “An amazing deal for Aston Villa.” “I think so. When you look at some of the other valuations involving Tonali and Anderson this summer, I don’t think it’s wild. Rogers is a top attacker who produces goals and assists, and he is at a great age. “But yes, it’s fantastic for Villa financially, especially considering how much they originally signed him for. No doubt they’ll bring somebody else in and try to go again. “Rogers will have his medical on Monday, which is tomorrow, according to our understanding. He will sign a six-year contract, with Chelsea holding the option to extend it by another 12 months. “Xabi Alonso was at the heart of the deal. He was instrumental in convincing Rogers to join Chelsea, play for him and become part of the project.

SHAYEE 𒀭

201,450 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Why Manchester City Could Still Hold a Buy-Back Clause on Morgan Rogers Reports suggesting Manchester City hold a buy-back clause on Morgan Rogers have sparked debate among Aston Villa supporters, largely because Rogers did not join Villa directly from City. The immediate reaction is understandable. Rogers moved from Manchester City to Middlesbrough in 2023 before joining Aston Villa in January 2024. If City sold the player before his move to Villa, how could they possibly retain a future right to bring him back? The answer is that football contracts can be more complex than many supporters realise. Buy-back clauses do not always disappear after a second transfer Most supporters are familiar with sell-on clauses. A club develops a young player, sells him, and retains a percentage of any future transfer fee. Buy-back clauses operate differently. In some cases, the selling club negotiates a contractual right to re-sign the player at a predetermined price during a specified period. While these arrangements are most commonly associated with direct transfers, there is nothing in football regulations preventing the right from surviving future moves if all parties agree. In theory, Manchester City could have sold Rogers to Middlesbrough while retaining a long-term repurchase right. When Villa negotiated Rogers' transfer, that obligation could have been disclosed and accepted as part of the transfer structure. If such an agreement exists, Villa would have purchased the player fully aware of the clause. There is precedent across European football Spanish clubs have used similar mechanisms for years. Real Madrid have repeatedly sold talented young players while retaining future control through buy-back agreements. Players such as Álvaro Morata, Casemiro and Dani Carvajal all left Madrid before later returning through contractual rights negotiated in earlier deals. The principle is simple: the selling club sacrifices immediate ownership but maintains a pathway to regain the player if his development exceeds expectations. Why the Rogers story feels different The scepticism among Villa supporters is not because the arrangement would be illegal. It is because such a clause would be unusually significant. Morgan Rogers has emerged as one of the Premier League's most exciting attacking players. Were City holding an £80 million buy-back option, it would represent one of the most valuable contractual clauses attached to a player outside the traditional elite clubs. Normally, details of arrangements of that magnitude surface quickly. The absence of widespread reporting about a buy-back clause during Rogers' move to Villa is what makes many observers cautious. The most likely explanation At present, the more plausible scenario remains that Manchester City hold a substantial sell-on clause rather than an active buy-back option. A sell-on clause would allow City to benefit financially from any future transfer without giving them the power to dictate Rogers' future. A buy-back clause, by contrast, would potentially allow City to re-acquire one of Villa's most valuable assets at a predetermined fee, regardless of his market value at the time. Without access to the contracts, certainty is impossible. The question is not whether such a clause is legally possible. The question is whether Aston Villa would really have sanctioned it on a player who has since become one of the Premier League's breakout stars. #AVFC

Aston Villa Updates

13,558 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

FT Sunderland 1-0 Spurs In case of emergency break glass well it’s time to smash it. No wins in 2026 and it’s mid April. When your struggling your luck just doesn’t run your way. A completely freak own goal out of nowhere. Then to make matters worse Brobbey on a yellow card pushes Romero into our keeper injuring them both with our captain having to leave the pitch 🤦🏻‍♂️ Let’s be honest tho what was Romero doing in that 1st half he was a liability lacking any discipline he got his 9th yellow of the season some leadership this was from our so called captain. Was this performance that much different than the previous 13 games ? I don’t think so. Udogie was the notable difference getting himself into positions with his dangerous runs forward and was probably our best player today. The midfield of Gray & Bergvall were just poor. Brobbey caused us non-stop trouble. We just couldn’t handle him. How did have we yet another poor referee? 🤦🏻‍♂️ Kinsky at least looked calm and composed and made a very good save in that 1st half he’s so much better with his feet than Vicario. Richarlison, Solanke, and Muani didn’t link up well at all. Did we deserve to lose to a goal like that ? no but you don’t always get what you deserve.I’m not sure how we are going to escape this mess I really don’t,the confidence and body language of the players got worse as the game went on. 14 games now without a win We’ve lost 32 games now when conceding first did you ever believe we were going to score ? It’s going to take a super human effort from De Zerbi to save this club from going down. We hardly created any clear chances #COYS 🤍💙

Jonny H

36,461 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce