Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 NUCLEAR BUNKERS: FROM BILLIONAIRE BLING TO BACKYARD FLEX Zuckerberg and Kardashian’s luxury bunkers scream apocalypse chic, but now regular folks are joining the club. Starting at $20K, these steel hideaways come with air filters to handle nuclear fallout, biohazards, or just nosy neighbors. Sales exploded after the Ukraine...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,234,068 subscribers

51,005 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля β⁣rаԁ Gаrlі⁣nghoսѕe⁣🌞
β⁣rаԁ Gаrlі⁣nghoսѕe⁣🌞1 год назад

Pathway to success.

Фото профиля Bṛ⁣ȧd Gаrlingou⁣se﹒
Bṛ⁣ȧd Gаrlingou⁣se﹒1 год назад

Progress that unites us all.

Фото профиля Frontline Focus
Frontline Focus1 год назад

Most Americans believe Trump’s presidency will bring LASTING PEACE to the Middle East .

Фото профиля Splad
Splad1 год назад

Flex all you want. Most of those folks won't ever make it to their bunker when it all goes south.

Фото профиля Salvazion
Salvazion1 год назад

All About Bunkers for an Apocalyptic War

Фото профиля Noble Gold Investments
Noble Gold Investments3 лет назад

Protect your money now! Two US banks collapsed, billions trapped. Invest in gold, a retirement hedge outside of the government's control.

Фото профиля JKash 🍊MAGA Queen
JKash 🍊MAGA Queen1 год назад

I want to know if what I heard about Hawaii and Zuck is true!

Фото профиля Block
Block1 год назад

Interesting

Фото профиля Xnews_with_Grok
Xnews_with_Grok1 год назад

Good business his phone rang every 30 seconds. Apparently, #Nuclear threat is one of their marketing.

Фото профиля Gravy
Gravy1 год назад

How did they know about these stuffs?

Фото профиля Carmagnola
Carmagnola1 год назад

I'm having a difficult time envisioning a Kardashian emerging from her bunker, after surviving the nuclear exchange, to then survive the post-apocalyptic world while dining on rats that she's trapped.

Похожие видео

🚨 BILL GATES HAS 11 DOOMSDAY BUNKERS — THIS IS THE MAN WHO BUILDS APOCALYPSE SHELTERS FOR THE ELITES A luxury bunker builder just went on camera and gave a tour of one of his underground bomb shelters, while naming some of the powerful clients he says are preparing to go underground. According to him, he has built bunkers for: • Bill Gates: who he claims owns 11 bunkers • Mark Zuckerberg • The Kardashians • Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan He says the Tate brothers bought six massive bunker units that connect together underground into one giant compound. Each bunker is bigger than a New York apartment. Price per bunker? About $400,000. According to the builder, the six-bunker setup for the Tate brothers came out to roughly $3.9 million. He says wealthy people "are not cutting any corners." Some bunkers are hidden behind secret doors and staircases inside mansions. But the part that really caught people’s attention is what he said next. When he started building bunkers in 2011, people believed the chance of seeing civil war or World War III in their lifetime was only around 1%. Hidden passages. Secret bunkers. Underground apartments for the powerful. And this is the man who builds them. Why are the ultra-wealthy suddenly preparing to go underground?
1:22

🚨 BILL GATES HAS 11 DOOMSDAY BUNKERS — THIS IS THE MAN WHO BUILDS APOCALYPSE SHELTERS FOR THE ELITES A luxury bunker builder just went on camera and gave a tour of one of his underground bomb shelters, while naming some of the powerful clients he says are preparing to go underground. According to him, he has built bunkers for: • Bill Gates: who he claims owns 11 bunkers • Mark Zuckerberg • The Kardashians • Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan He says the Tate brothers bought six massive bunker units that connect together underground into one giant compound. Each bunker is bigger than a New York apartment. Price per bunker? About $400,000. According to the builder, the six-bunker setup for the Tate brothers came out to roughly $3.9 million. He says wealthy people "are not cutting any corners." Some bunkers are hidden behind secret doors and staircases inside mansions. But the part that really caught people’s attention is what he said next. When he started building bunkers in 2011, people believed the chance of seeing civil war or World War III in their lifetime was only around 1%. Hidden passages. Secret bunkers. Underground apartments for the powerful. And this is the man who builds them. Why are the ultra-wealthy suddenly preparing to go underground?

HustleBitch

302,974 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 DOOMSDAY VAULTS: THE NUCLEAR BUNKERS THAT STORE YOUR MESSENGER CHATS Nuclear bunkers from the Cold War are now hosting your cloud selfies, Spotify streams, and grandma’s cookie recipe. Big Tech is retrofitting underground caves, bomb shelters, and even Arctic mines into “apocalypse-proof” data centers that promise your files will outlive you. Why? Because regular data centers can’t handle car bombs, cyberattacks, or squirrels with a taste for fiber optic cables. Companies like Cyberfort in the UK are storing data behind blast doors and biometric locks, claiming, “The client might not survive the apocalypse, but their data will.” It’s not just about hackers anymore. It's about keeping TikTok operational when the world ends. Source: WIRED via The Conversation
0:44

🚨 DOOMSDAY VAULTS: THE NUCLEAR BUNKERS THAT STORE YOUR MESSENGER CHATS Nuclear bunkers from the Cold War are now hosting your cloud selfies, Spotify streams, and grandma’s cookie recipe. Big Tech is retrofitting underground caves, bomb shelters, and even Arctic mines into “apocalypse-proof” data centers that promise your files will outlive you. Why? Because regular data centers can’t handle car bombs, cyberattacks, or squirrels with a taste for fiber optic cables. Companies like Cyberfort in the UK are storing data behind blast doors and biometric locks, claiming, “The client might not survive the apocalypse, but their data will.” It’s not just about hackers anymore. It's about keeping TikTok operational when the world ends. Source: WIRED via The Conversation

Mario Nawfal

90,238 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Trump lied about the cost of the ballroom, but there’s another angle to this. How does a ballroom go from costing $400 million to $1 billion? Because it’s not just a ballroom. They’re building a bunker underneath to ensure that in a nuclear war the politicians who caused it will survive while we all die. That’s why this is so urgent. The only way to survive a nuclear war is to prevent one by stopping these politicians from having a secure bunker where they will be safe. Imagine how much more dangerous their rhetoric, policies, and wars will become when they know they won’t suffer the consequences from them. The safer the elites are, the less safe the people are.
2:05

Trump lied about the cost of the ballroom, but there’s another angle to this. How does a ballroom go from costing $400 million to $1 billion? Because it’s not just a ballroom. They’re building a bunker underneath to ensure that in a nuclear war the politicians who caused it will survive while we all die. That’s why this is so urgent. The only way to survive a nuclear war is to prevent one by stopping these politicians from having a secure bunker where they will be safe. Imagine how much more dangerous their rhetoric, policies, and wars will become when they know they won’t suffer the consequences from them. The safer the elites are, the less safe the people are.

Power to the People ☭🕊

542,610 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🔥🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Here is a video introduction from Oppidum the underground apocalypse bunker manufacturer. He Majority of the politicians, celebrities and billionaires are selecting Oppidum to build their underground bunker. These bunkers are starting at $40 million. The company is owned by former Chief of the Military Intelligence Service of the Czech Republic and Brigadier General named Jakub Zamrazil. This is interesting because the Czech Republic hosts a NATO Center of Excellence for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear defense, helping NATO's military commanders and civilian decision-makers meet the potential threat of WMD attacks. Their position in NATO increased under President Obama and Secretary Clinton on January 29, 2015 when Obama announced a plan to create a genetic biobank with the help of the Czech Republic.
3:17

🔥🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Here is a video introduction from Oppidum the underground apocalypse bunker manufacturer. He Majority of the politicians, celebrities and billionaires are selecting Oppidum to build their underground bunker. These bunkers are starting at $40 million. The company is owned by former Chief of the Military Intelligence Service of the Czech Republic and Brigadier General named Jakub Zamrazil. This is interesting because the Czech Republic hosts a NATO Center of Excellence for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear defense, helping NATO's military commanders and civilian decision-makers meet the potential threat of WMD attacks. Their position in NATO increased under President Obama and Secretary Clinton on January 29, 2015 when Obama announced a plan to create a genetic biobank with the help of the Czech Republic.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

2,870,889 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?
0:57

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?

Mario Nawfal

10,996,455 просмотров • 2 лет назад

President Trump says he and Putin talked about "de-nuclearizing" and that "there's no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons." "We were talking about de-nuking; president Putin and I agreed we are going to do it in a very big way. There's no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many you could destroy the world 50 times over, 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons and they're building nuclear weapons and China is building nuclear weapons and China is trying to catch up because you know, they're very substantially behind, but ithin five or six years they'll be even. And we're all spending a lot of money that we could be spending on other things that are actually hopefully much more productive. Hopefully there'll never be a time wren with -- when we need those weapons. If there's ever a time when we need nuclear weapon, the kind of weapons that we're building and Russia has and China has to a lesser extent but will have. That's going to be a very sad day. That's going to be probably oblivion."
1:00

President Trump says he and Putin talked about "de-nuclearizing" and that "there's no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons." "We were talking about de-nuking; president Putin and I agreed we are going to do it in a very big way. There's no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many you could destroy the world 50 times over, 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons and they're building nuclear weapons and China is building nuclear weapons and China is trying to catch up because you know, they're very substantially behind, but ithin five or six years they'll be even. And we're all spending a lot of money that we could be spending on other things that are actually hopefully much more productive. Hopefully there'll never be a time wren with -- when we need those weapons. If there's ever a time when we need nuclear weapon, the kind of weapons that we're building and Russia has and China has to a lesser extent but will have. That's going to be a very sad day. That's going to be probably oblivion."

Ken Klippenstein (NSPM-7 Compliant)

683,841 просмотров • 1 год назад

Pastor Erik Reed boldly putting an end to the "both sides" arguments we've seen from many Christians over the last few weeks and calling out the Democrats for being at war with "creational reality." "We are living in a world where there are two different visions for what kind of society we want to live in. And if Christ is not in the foundations of what we're doing with our vision for the future, if the Christian foundation and worldview that made our country great to begin with is not there, and everybody's just doing what's right in their own eyes, you can guarantee chaos will ensue. We are choosing between two distinct futures. They are not the same. Our two political parties in our country are not morally equivalent to each other... I am not baptizing the Republican Party. They did not come from Mount Sinai on high from God to say 'Thus saith the Lord.' But the current state of the Democratic Party, as they are...they are a party at war with creational realities every day. Creational realities. They are at war about what it means to be a man or a woman, about marriage, about sexuality, about who has the right to live in a womb. They are at war with life and prosperity. There is one side in particular with a progressive ideology that not only tried to suppress the story of the young woman in Charlotte, but who celebrated, both in the media and with college professors and many others, the death of a man whose beliefs they did not hold... And if you're more concerned with what I've just said in the last two or three minutes, about sounding partisan, than you are concerned about the reality of what's actually happening in our society right now, you have lost the plot."
1:57

Pastor Erik Reed boldly putting an end to the "both sides" arguments we've seen from many Christians over the last few weeks and calling out the Democrats for being at war with "creational reality." "We are living in a world where there are two different visions for what kind of society we want to live in. And if Christ is not in the foundations of what we're doing with our vision for the future, if the Christian foundation and worldview that made our country great to begin with is not there, and everybody's just doing what's right in their own eyes, you can guarantee chaos will ensue. We are choosing between two distinct futures. They are not the same. Our two political parties in our country are not morally equivalent to each other... I am not baptizing the Republican Party. They did not come from Mount Sinai on high from God to say 'Thus saith the Lord.' But the current state of the Democratic Party, as they are...they are a party at war with creational realities every day. Creational realities. They are at war about what it means to be a man or a woman, about marriage, about sexuality, about who has the right to live in a womb. They are at war with life and prosperity. There is one side in particular with a progressive ideology that not only tried to suppress the story of the young woman in Charlotte, but who celebrated, both in the media and with college professors and many others, the death of a man whose beliefs they did not hold... And if you're more concerned with what I've just said in the last two or three minutes, about sounding partisan, than you are concerned about the reality of what's actually happening in our society right now, you have lost the plot."

Center for Baptist Leadership

105,520 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Nuclear bombs are fake. 100% fiction. Japan surrendered because of Soviet invasion and their cities were fire bombed. Fact. Rods of god are not fake however. Satellites aren’t “orbiting” by falling forever around a spinning ball. That’s complete nonsense. They’re attached to balloons. NASA is the #1 consumer of helium. All of the world’s “space” presence is from balloons. Fallout radiation is the thing that always terrifies people about nuclear bombs. Which don’t exist. The concept is so stupid. But, 5G towers theoretically could mimic the symptoms of radiation poisoning in people after a rod hits something. That quantity and frequency obviously needs a massive and sustainable energy source. Ultra high frequency has a very short range. That’s why there are so many 5G towers every few blocks. It’s easy to get away from them. Keep an eye out for that move. The grabblers are really up to some sneaky schemes and tricks these days
2:58

Nuclear bombs are fake. 100% fiction. Japan surrendered because of Soviet invasion and their cities were fire bombed. Fact. Rods of god are not fake however. Satellites aren’t “orbiting” by falling forever around a spinning ball. That’s complete nonsense. They’re attached to balloons. NASA is the #1 consumer of helium. All of the world’s “space” presence is from balloons. Fallout radiation is the thing that always terrifies people about nuclear bombs. Which don’t exist. The concept is so stupid. But, 5G towers theoretically could mimic the symptoms of radiation poisoning in people after a rod hits something. That quantity and frequency obviously needs a massive and sustainable energy source. Ultra high frequency has a very short range. That’s why there are so many 5G towers every few blocks. It’s easy to get away from them. Keep an eye out for that move. The grabblers are really up to some sneaky schemes and tricks these days

Owen Benjamin 🐻

92,888 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The world has spent approximately $6–7 trillion cumulatively on wind turbines and solar panels. With that amount, we could have built up to 1,400 standard nuclear power plants (each with ~1–1.2 GW capacity, typical for modern large reactors). With proper maintenance, safety upgrades, and regulatory approvals, many nuclear plants last 60 years- 80 years or more. A typical wind or solar farm lasts about 20 years, meaning we would need to spend up to $21 trillion to produce the same energy as nuclear. With $21 trillion, the world could theoretically fund up to 4,000 nuclear power plants. Now lets talk about wind turbines. Without the Production Tax Credit (PTC), many wind farms were not economically viable from electricity sales alone, due to high upfront costs, intermittency (requiring backup power), and competition from cheaper sources like natural gas. The tax credits effectively offset a significant portion of costs—in some cases covering much or all of the investment for tax-liable entities—turning otherwise marginal or unprofitable projects into attractive ones. Are you seeing the scam? It's time to start building more nuclear and less of these green dream turbines and solar panels.
0:55

The world has spent approximately $6–7 trillion cumulatively on wind turbines and solar panels. With that amount, we could have built up to 1,400 standard nuclear power plants (each with ~1–1.2 GW capacity, typical for modern large reactors). With proper maintenance, safety upgrades, and regulatory approvals, many nuclear plants last 60 years- 80 years or more. A typical wind or solar farm lasts about 20 years, meaning we would need to spend up to $21 trillion to produce the same energy as nuclear. With $21 trillion, the world could theoretically fund up to 4,000 nuclear power plants. Now lets talk about wind turbines. Without the Production Tax Credit (PTC), many wind farms were not economically viable from electricity sales alone, due to high upfront costs, intermittency (requiring backup power), and competition from cheaper sources like natural gas. The tax credits effectively offset a significant portion of costs—in some cases covering much or all of the investment for tax-liable entities—turning otherwise marginal or unprofitable projects into attractive ones. Are you seeing the scam? It's time to start building more nuclear and less of these green dream turbines and solar panels.

John Lee Pettimore

120,600 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.
0:37

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.

Mario Nawfal

6,904,590 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🇮🇷 INTERVIEW – SCOTT HORTON: “IRAN MAY BE CLOSER TO A NUKE, BUT THAT’S BECAUSE OF ISRAELI SABOTAGE” Scott Horton says Israeli attacks on Iran’s nuclear program backfired – pushing Tehran closer to weapons-grade enrichment. Scott Horton: “I agree with Trita – Iran is more likely to pursue a nuclear weapon now than ever before. But that shift didn’t happen after October 7. It began after Israel sabotaged Iran’s Natanz facility in April 2021 and assassinated the head of its nuclear program in 2020. That’s when Iran started enriching uranium to 60 percent. But 60 percent isn’t useful for weapons. You need at least 90 percent for a bomb. So why go to 60? It’s a bargaining chip. A bigger bluff. Something they can negotiate away. Iran says their fatwas against WMDs still stand, and they’re not building a bomb. That might still be true, but the risk of breakout is now much higher. And if you ask why, look at the provocations. Israel escalated, and Iran responded.”
2:56

🇮🇷 INTERVIEW – SCOTT HORTON: “IRAN MAY BE CLOSER TO A NUKE, BUT THAT’S BECAUSE OF ISRAELI SABOTAGE” Scott Horton says Israeli attacks on Iran’s nuclear program backfired – pushing Tehran closer to weapons-grade enrichment. Scott Horton: “I agree with Trita – Iran is more likely to pursue a nuclear weapon now than ever before. But that shift didn’t happen after October 7. It began after Israel sabotaged Iran’s Natanz facility in April 2021 and assassinated the head of its nuclear program in 2020. That’s when Iran started enriching uranium to 60 percent. But 60 percent isn’t useful for weapons. You need at least 90 percent for a bomb. So why go to 60? It’s a bargaining chip. A bigger bluff. Something they can negotiate away. Iran says their fatwas against WMDs still stand, and they’re not building a bomb. That might still be true, but the risk of breakout is now much higher. And if you ask why, look at the provocations. Israel escalated, and Iran responded.”

Mario Nawfal

73,185 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

‼️🇷🇺 Russia has always known that the US, UK, NATO planned a larger war against Russia. Ukraine was just the West's opening salvo. NATO from its inception is an anti-Russia military organization. Russia's FM Sergey Lavrov: "Europe does not hide its preparations for a new big war. For example, in July, France and Britain agreed to coordinate nuclear forces and created a "kind of Entente" to develop missile systems. At the same time, London and Berlin signed an agreement on military cooperation, and the other day they started talking about giving it a nuclear dimension." NATO's plans to intensify NATO in the Arctic are also cause for concern, and the alliance is also seeking to "stake out" a place for itself in the Pacific Ocean, its goal is deterrence China and the isolation of Russia: « "We have repeatedly said that we did not and do not have intentions to attack any of the current members of NATO and the European Union. We are ready to enshrine this position in future security guarantees for this part of Eurasia, but EU leaders are moving away from considering these future guarantees on a truly collective basis."
1:00

‼️🇷🇺 Russia has always known that the US, UK, NATO planned a larger war against Russia. Ukraine was just the West's opening salvo. NATO from its inception is an anti-Russia military organization. Russia's FM Sergey Lavrov: "Europe does not hide its preparations for a new big war. For example, in July, France and Britain agreed to coordinate nuclear forces and created a "kind of Entente" to develop missile systems. At the same time, London and Berlin signed an agreement on military cooperation, and the other day they started talking about giving it a nuclear dimension." NATO's plans to intensify NATO in the Arctic are also cause for concern, and the alliance is also seeking to "stake out" a place for itself in the Pacific Ocean, its goal is deterrence China and the isolation of Russia: « "We have repeatedly said that we did not and do not have intentions to attack any of the current members of NATO and the European Union. We are ready to enshrine this position in future security guarantees for this part of Eurasia, but EU leaders are moving away from considering these future guarantees on a truly collective basis."

⏳Towhee 🌏☮️

170,825 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Kevin O’Leary just said the quiet part out loud about what the Hormuz closure has confirmed about green energy: “It’s been practically USELESS in helping us at this point right now.” AOC and the climate alarmists are not going to like this one bit. O’LEARY: “The one thing about this commodity, it’s the input to EVERY sector of the economy.” “We have 11 sectors. Every single sector requires a reasonably priced energy source.” “And you know, we’ve talked a lot about alternative energy and new ideas and nuclear power.” “But this shock has proven to the world that oil still matters — not a some, it matters A LOT!” “And I expect policy around hydrocarbons to change dramatically everywhere in terms of securing a source of it at a price, sort of around the $70 range.” “So you’re going to see that happen and a lot less money going into alternatives.” “That may not be good or bad, depending on where you sit, but CLEARLY we didn’t buy any insurance investing billions of dollars in wind and solar.” “It’s been practically USELESS in helping us at this point right now.”
0:48

Kevin O’Leary just said the quiet part out loud about what the Hormuz closure has confirmed about green energy: “It’s been practically USELESS in helping us at this point right now.” AOC and the climate alarmists are not going to like this one bit. O’LEARY: “The one thing about this commodity, it’s the input to EVERY sector of the economy.” “We have 11 sectors. Every single sector requires a reasonably priced energy source.” “And you know, we’ve talked a lot about alternative energy and new ideas and nuclear power.” “But this shock has proven to the world that oil still matters — not a some, it matters A LOT!” “And I expect policy around hydrocarbons to change dramatically everywhere in terms of securing a source of it at a price, sort of around the $70 range.” “So you’re going to see that happen and a lot less money going into alternatives.” “That may not be good or bad, depending on where you sit, but CLEARLY we didn’t buy any insurance investing billions of dollars in wind and solar.” “It’s been practically USELESS in helping us at this point right now.”

Overton

155,234 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Israel Strikes Near Bushehr The reported Israeli bombing in the vicinity of the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant raises questions about Israel's objectives. The pattern of targeting critical infrastructure, from water desalination plants to areas close to sensitive nuclear sites, should serve as a strategic shock to the regional actors, especially GGC. These attacks have the potential to create a large scale existential threat to the Gulf region. A scenario comparable to the Chornobyl disaster is no longer unthinkable if strikes occur near nuclear facilities. Before any escalation, Qatar’s foreign minister warned explicitly about the consequences of targeting Bushehr. “Water supply for the whole region will be contaminated, and Qatar, Kuwait, and the UAE will run out of water within three days.” Given the scale of the potential humanitarian and environmental fallout, the absence of clearly defined rules of engagement around such sensitive infrastructure is deeply alarming. Sites adjacent to Nuclear plants are not conventional military sites. Their destruction or damage carries consequences that are indiscriminate and transnational. Israel, through these attacks, is threatening the Gulf to participate in a devastating war with Iran or is targeting Iran in a way that would lead to direct regional confrontation with the Gulf. The lack of serious public discourse around the radioactive risks is also concerning. In a worst case scenario, depending on wind direction, the radioactive contamination due to any attack on Busherh could extend as far as Pakistan, affecting coastal regions such as Karachi. Clips from Interview with Tucker Carlson
2:42

Israel Strikes Near Bushehr The reported Israeli bombing in the vicinity of the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant raises questions about Israel's objectives. The pattern of targeting critical infrastructure, from water desalination plants to areas close to sensitive nuclear sites, should serve as a strategic shock to the regional actors, especially GGC. These attacks have the potential to create a large scale existential threat to the Gulf region. A scenario comparable to the Chornobyl disaster is no longer unthinkable if strikes occur near nuclear facilities. Before any escalation, Qatar’s foreign minister warned explicitly about the consequences of targeting Bushehr. “Water supply for the whole region will be contaminated, and Qatar, Kuwait, and the UAE will run out of water within three days.” Given the scale of the potential humanitarian and environmental fallout, the absence of clearly defined rules of engagement around such sensitive infrastructure is deeply alarming. Sites adjacent to Nuclear plants are not conventional military sites. Their destruction or damage carries consequences that are indiscriminate and transnational. Israel, through these attacks, is threatening the Gulf to participate in a devastating war with Iran or is targeting Iran in a way that would lead to direct regional confrontation with the Gulf. The lack of serious public discourse around the radioactive risks is also concerning. In a worst case scenario, depending on wind direction, the radioactive contamination due to any attack on Busherh could extend as far as Pakistan, affecting coastal regions such as Karachi. Clips from Interview with Tucker Carlson

Talha Ahmad

67,729 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

WHY WE SHOULD GO TO MARS: ELON MUSK ON SECURING THE FUTURE OF CONSCIOUSNESS Going to Mars isn’t about escape—it’s about insurance. It’s about making sure the light of consciousness doesn’t go out if something catastrophic happens on Earth. Elon has consistently framed the Mars mission as the single most important step humanity can take to ensure long-term survival and expansion. “The key branching point for human destiny or destiny of consciousness as a whole is that Mars is self-sustaining, even if the resupply ships from Earth stop coming. You’re not multiplanetary until the planet can grow by itself. Because there’s always some risk of technology on Earth falling below a certain level or of a nuclear war or a meteor. You haven’t secured the future of civilization and consciousness until both planets can survive independently.” This is why Mars matters: • Backup for humanity — A second home protects against single-point failures (asteroids, supervolcanoes, pandemics, nuclear conflict, AI misalignment, etc.). • Self-sustaining civilization — Once Mars can grow its own population and industry without constant Earth resupply, consciousness becomes multiplanetary and far more resilient. • Inspiration & progress driver — The challenge forces breakthroughs in energy, life support, materials, AI, and closed-loop systems that benefit Earth too. • Long-term species survival — Staying on one fragile planet forever is a gamble with extinction-level risks. Mars turns that into a hedge. Every Starship launch, every refueling test, every iteration brings us closer to that branching point. It’s not luxury—it’s the ultimate act of responsibility toward future generations.
2:11

WHY WE SHOULD GO TO MARS: ELON MUSK ON SECURING THE FUTURE OF CONSCIOUSNESS Going to Mars isn’t about escape—it’s about insurance. It’s about making sure the light of consciousness doesn’t go out if something catastrophic happens on Earth. Elon has consistently framed the Mars mission as the single most important step humanity can take to ensure long-term survival and expansion. “The key branching point for human destiny or destiny of consciousness as a whole is that Mars is self-sustaining, even if the resupply ships from Earth stop coming. You’re not multiplanetary until the planet can grow by itself. Because there’s always some risk of technology on Earth falling below a certain level or of a nuclear war or a meteor. You haven’t secured the future of civilization and consciousness until both planets can survive independently.” This is why Mars matters: • Backup for humanity — A second home protects against single-point failures (asteroids, supervolcanoes, pandemics, nuclear conflict, AI misalignment, etc.). • Self-sustaining civilization — Once Mars can grow its own population and industry without constant Earth resupply, consciousness becomes multiplanetary and far more resilient. • Inspiration & progress driver — The challenge forces breakthroughs in energy, life support, materials, AI, and closed-loop systems that benefit Earth too. • Long-term species survival — Staying on one fragile planet forever is a gamble with extinction-level risks. Mars turns that into a hedge. Every Starship launch, every refueling test, every iteration brings us closer to that branching point. It’s not luxury—it’s the ultimate act of responsibility toward future generations.

Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

652,974 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

☢️Trump will WALK AWAY from Iran War…but can Middle East nuclear proliferation be STOPPED? Afshin Rattansi: ‘How can the world disarm Israel of nuclear weapons then?’ Former Israeli Acting President Abraham Burg: ‘It’s not about disarming Israel, it’s about the entire region.’ Afshin: ‘Well, no one else has nuclear weapons, it’s just Israel that has them in this region. How can the world disarm them?’ Burg: ‘What started now does not end with this two-week ceasefire. There are so many genies out of the bottle now. And the motivation for nuclear power without America, because America under Trump will walk away like it ran away from so many other conflicts around the world in the last 20-some years, people will be motivated to have nuclear weapons. So there should be both a regional setting and global pressure to disable anybody who has nuclear capability, war nuclear capability, not to have it. Whatever guarantees are given to Iran, to the Saudis, to the Israelis, those guarantees should be very, very solid, very, very strong. But with one bottom line: the Middle East clean and clear of weapons of mass destruction. Can we have nuclear capabilities and nuclear reactors for energy? Yes. Should these nuclear energy centres be run together by Israelis and Saudis and Iranians and Egyptians and Emiratis? The answer is yes. The more cooperation we have on peacetime nuclear capability, the less threat we have with the warheads.’ Watch the full interview with Avraham Burg below in the replies👇
1:37

☢️Trump will WALK AWAY from Iran War…but can Middle East nuclear proliferation be STOPPED? Afshin Rattansi: ‘How can the world disarm Israel of nuclear weapons then?’ Former Israeli Acting President Abraham Burg: ‘It’s not about disarming Israel, it’s about the entire region.’ Afshin: ‘Well, no one else has nuclear weapons, it’s just Israel that has them in this region. How can the world disarm them?’ Burg: ‘What started now does not end with this two-week ceasefire. There are so many genies out of the bottle now. And the motivation for nuclear power without America, because America under Trump will walk away like it ran away from so many other conflicts around the world in the last 20-some years, people will be motivated to have nuclear weapons. So there should be both a regional setting and global pressure to disable anybody who has nuclear capability, war nuclear capability, not to have it. Whatever guarantees are given to Iran, to the Saudis, to the Israelis, those guarantees should be very, very solid, very, very strong. But with one bottom line: the Middle East clean and clear of weapons of mass destruction. Can we have nuclear capabilities and nuclear reactors for energy? Yes. Should these nuclear energy centres be run together by Israelis and Saudis and Iranians and Egyptians and Emiratis? The answer is yes. The more cooperation we have on peacetime nuclear capability, the less threat we have with the warheads.’ Watch the full interview with Avraham Burg below in the replies👇

Going Underground

33,475 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ELON: MAKE MARS CHEAP OR HUMANITY’S DOOMED “The key branching point for human destiny or destiny of consciousness as a whole is that Mars is self-sustaining, even if the resupply ships from Earth stop coming. Because there's always some risk of technology on Earth falling below a certain level or of a nuclear war or a meteor. So, the goal of SpaceX is trying to get to the point where Mars can survive by itself and grow by itself as quickly as possible. This requires millions of tons or at least a million tons to the surface of Mars of useful load and reducing the cost per ton to the surface of Mars by a factor of 1,000 to maybe 10,000, if not more than 10,000. Currently, the cost per ton to the surface of Mars is about a billion dollars. Civilization can't afford to build Mars at a billion dollars a ton, even a million dollars a ton is still high. So, a million dollars a ton is a 1000-fold improvement, but you really rather be at $100,000 a ton, which is still a lot, but I think aspiration should be to get the cost per ton to Mars under $100,000 a ton. This is a 10,000-fold improvement for where things are today. Thought of another way, we literally need to make things a million percent better.” Source: Interview with Everyday Astronaut, May 27, 2025
2:11

ELON: MAKE MARS CHEAP OR HUMANITY’S DOOMED “The key branching point for human destiny or destiny of consciousness as a whole is that Mars is self-sustaining, even if the resupply ships from Earth stop coming. Because there's always some risk of technology on Earth falling below a certain level or of a nuclear war or a meteor. So, the goal of SpaceX is trying to get to the point where Mars can survive by itself and grow by itself as quickly as possible. This requires millions of tons or at least a million tons to the surface of Mars of useful load and reducing the cost per ton to the surface of Mars by a factor of 1,000 to maybe 10,000, if not more than 10,000. Currently, the cost per ton to the surface of Mars is about a billion dollars. Civilization can't afford to build Mars at a billion dollars a ton, even a million dollars a ton is still high. So, a million dollars a ton is a 1000-fold improvement, but you really rather be at $100,000 a ton, which is still a lot, but I think aspiration should be to get the cost per ton to Mars under $100,000 a ton. This is a 10,000-fold improvement for where things are today. Thought of another way, we literally need to make things a million percent better.” Source: Interview with Everyday Astronaut, May 27, 2025

Mario Nawfal

28,948 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇺🇸 “ALIEN MOTHERSHIP” OR SPACE ROCK: 3I/ATLAS HAS PEOPLE SPIRALING A huge interstellar object called 3I/ATLAS just zipped through our cosmic neighborhood, and the internet immediately did what it does best: went full sci fi. Some headlines are floating wild theories like “hostile alien technology” or an alien “mothership” dropping probes to spy on Earth. Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb is among the voices asking big questions, and a few members of Congress are even hinting about a possible cover up. But here’s the grounded version: interstellar objects can be weird, fast, and hard to study, and that leaves a lot of room for speculation to sprint ahead of the data. So no, you probably do not need to build a bunker today, but you should absolutely enjoy the chaos while scientists try to figure out what 3I/ATLAS actually is. Source: NY Post
1:21

🇺🇸 “ALIEN MOTHERSHIP” OR SPACE ROCK: 3I/ATLAS HAS PEOPLE SPIRALING A huge interstellar object called 3I/ATLAS just zipped through our cosmic neighborhood, and the internet immediately did what it does best: went full sci fi. Some headlines are floating wild theories like “hostile alien technology” or an alien “mothership” dropping probes to spy on Earth. Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb is among the voices asking big questions, and a few members of Congress are even hinting about a possible cover up. But here’s the grounded version: interstellar objects can be weird, fast, and hard to study, and that leaves a lot of room for speculation to sprint ahead of the data. So no, you probably do not need to build a bunker today, but you should absolutely enjoy the chaos while scientists try to figure out what 3I/ATLAS actually is. Source: NY Post

Mario Nawfal

28,497 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад