Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 NUCLEAR BUNKERS: FROM BILLIONAIRE BLING TO BACKYARD FLEX Zuckerberg and Kardashian’s luxury bunkers scream apocalypse chic, but now regular folks are joining the club. Starting at $20K, these steel hideaways come with air filters to handle nuclear fallout, biohazards, or just nosy neighbors. Sales exploded after the Ukraine...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,234,068 subscribers

51,005 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & TeknolojiHaberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Yorum

β⁣rаԁ Gаrlі⁣nghoսѕe⁣🌞 profil fotoğrafı
β⁣rаԁ Gаrlі⁣nghoսѕe⁣🌞1 yıl önce

Pathway to success.

Bṛ⁣ȧd Gаrlingou⁣se﹒ profil fotoğrafı
Bṛ⁣ȧd Gаrlingou⁣se﹒1 yıl önce

Progress that unites us all.

Frontline Focus profil fotoğrafı
Frontline Focus1 yıl önce

Most Americans believe Trump’s presidency will bring LASTING PEACE to the Middle East .

Splad profil fotoğrafı
Splad1 yıl önce

Flex all you want. Most of those folks won't ever make it to their bunker when it all goes south.

Salvazion profil fotoğrafı
Salvazion1 yıl önce

All About Bunkers for an Apocalyptic War

Noble Gold Investments profil fotoğrafı
Noble Gold Investments3 yıl önce

Protect your money now! Two US banks collapsed, billions trapped. Invest in gold, a retirement hedge outside of the government's control.

JKash 🍊MAGA Queen profil fotoğrafı
JKash 🍊MAGA Queen1 yıl önce

I want to know if what I heard about Hawaii and Zuck is true!

Block profil fotoğrafı
Block1 yıl önce

Interesting

Xnews_with_Grok profil fotoğrafı
Xnews_with_Grok1 yıl önce

Good business his phone rang every 30 seconds. Apparently, #Nuclear threat is one of their marketing.

Gravy profil fotoğrafı
Gravy1 yıl önce

How did they know about these stuffs?

Carmagnola profil fotoğrafı
Carmagnola1 yıl önce

I'm having a difficult time envisioning a Kardashian emerging from her bunker, after surviving the nuclear exchange, to then survive the post-apocalyptic world while dining on rats that she's trapped.

Benzer Videolar

🚨 BILL GATES HAS 11 DOOMSDAY BUNKERS — THIS IS THE MAN WHO BUILDS APOCALYPSE SHELTERS FOR THE ELITES A luxury bunker builder just went on camera and gave a tour of one of his underground bomb shelters, while naming some of the powerful clients he says are preparing to go underground. According to him, he has built bunkers for: • Bill Gates: who he claims owns 11 bunkers • Mark Zuckerberg • The Kardashians • Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan He says the Tate brothers bought six massive bunker units that connect together underground into one giant compound. Each bunker is bigger than a New York apartment. Price per bunker? About $400,000. According to the builder, the six-bunker setup for the Tate brothers came out to roughly $3.9 million. He says wealthy people "are not cutting any corners." Some bunkers are hidden behind secret doors and staircases inside mansions. But the part that really caught people’s attention is what he said next. When he started building bunkers in 2011, people believed the chance of seeing civil war or World War III in their lifetime was only around 1%. Hidden passages. Secret bunkers. Underground apartments for the powerful. And this is the man who builds them. Why are the ultra-wealthy suddenly preparing to go underground?
1:22

🚨 BILL GATES HAS 11 DOOMSDAY BUNKERS — THIS IS THE MAN WHO BUILDS APOCALYPSE SHELTERS FOR THE ELITES A luxury bunker builder just went on camera and gave a tour of one of his underground bomb shelters, while naming some of the powerful clients he says are preparing to go underground. According to him, he has built bunkers for: • Bill Gates: who he claims owns 11 bunkers • Mark Zuckerberg • The Kardashians • Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan He says the Tate brothers bought six massive bunker units that connect together underground into one giant compound. Each bunker is bigger than a New York apartment. Price per bunker? About $400,000. According to the builder, the six-bunker setup for the Tate brothers came out to roughly $3.9 million. He says wealthy people "are not cutting any corners." Some bunkers are hidden behind secret doors and staircases inside mansions. But the part that really caught people’s attention is what he said next. When he started building bunkers in 2011, people believed the chance of seeing civil war or World War III in their lifetime was only around 1%. Hidden passages. Secret bunkers. Underground apartments for the powerful. And this is the man who builds them. Why are the ultra-wealthy suddenly preparing to go underground?

HustleBitch

304,445 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

🚨 DOOMSDAY VAULTS: THE NUCLEAR BUNKERS THAT STORE YOUR MESSENGER CHATS Nuclear bunkers from the Cold War are now hosting your cloud selfies, Spotify streams, and grandma’s cookie recipe. Big Tech is retrofitting underground caves, bomb shelters, and even Arctic mines into “apocalypse-proof” data centers that promise your files will outlive you. Why? Because regular data centers can’t handle car bombs, cyberattacks, or squirrels with a taste for fiber optic cables. Companies like Cyberfort in the UK are storing data behind blast doors and biometric locks, claiming, “The client might not survive the apocalypse, but their data will.” It’s not just about hackers anymore. It's about keeping TikTok operational when the world ends. Source: WIRED via The Conversation
0:44

🚨 DOOMSDAY VAULTS: THE NUCLEAR BUNKERS THAT STORE YOUR MESSENGER CHATS Nuclear bunkers from the Cold War are now hosting your cloud selfies, Spotify streams, and grandma’s cookie recipe. Big Tech is retrofitting underground caves, bomb shelters, and even Arctic mines into “apocalypse-proof” data centers that promise your files will outlive you. Why? Because regular data centers can’t handle car bombs, cyberattacks, or squirrels with a taste for fiber optic cables. Companies like Cyberfort in the UK are storing data behind blast doors and biometric locks, claiming, “The client might not survive the apocalypse, but their data will.” It’s not just about hackers anymore. It's about keeping TikTok operational when the world ends. Source: WIRED via The Conversation

Mario Nawfal

90,238 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Trump lied about the cost of the ballroom, but there’s another angle to this. How does a ballroom go from costing $400 million to $1 billion? Because it’s not just a ballroom. They’re building a bunker underneath to ensure that in a nuclear war the politicians who caused it will survive while we all die. That’s why this is so urgent. The only way to survive a nuclear war is to prevent one by stopping these politicians from having a secure bunker where they will be safe. Imagine how much more dangerous their rhetoric, policies, and wars will become when they know they won’t suffer the consequences from them. The safer the elites are, the less safe the people are.
2:05

Trump lied about the cost of the ballroom, but there’s another angle to this. How does a ballroom go from costing $400 million to $1 billion? Because it’s not just a ballroom. They’re building a bunker underneath to ensure that in a nuclear war the politicians who caused it will survive while we all die. That’s why this is so urgent. The only way to survive a nuclear war is to prevent one by stopping these politicians from having a secure bunker where they will be safe. Imagine how much more dangerous their rhetoric, policies, and wars will become when they know they won’t suffer the consequences from them. The safer the elites are, the less safe the people are.

Power to the People ☭🕊

542,823 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🔥🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Here is a video introduction from Oppidum the underground apocalypse bunker manufacturer. He Majority of the politicians, celebrities and billionaires are selecting Oppidum to build their underground bunker. These bunkers are starting at $40 million. The company is owned by former Chief of the Military Intelligence Service of the Czech Republic and Brigadier General named Jakub Zamrazil. This is interesting because the Czech Republic hosts a NATO Center of Excellence for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear defense, helping NATO's military commanders and civilian decision-makers meet the potential threat of WMD attacks. Their position in NATO increased under President Obama and Secretary Clinton on January 29, 2015 when Obama announced a plan to create a genetic biobank with the help of the Czech Republic.
3:17

🔥🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Here is a video introduction from Oppidum the underground apocalypse bunker manufacturer. He Majority of the politicians, celebrities and billionaires are selecting Oppidum to build their underground bunker. These bunkers are starting at $40 million. The company is owned by former Chief of the Military Intelligence Service of the Czech Republic and Brigadier General named Jakub Zamrazil. This is interesting because the Czech Republic hosts a NATO Center of Excellence for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear defense, helping NATO's military commanders and civilian decision-makers meet the potential threat of WMD attacks. Their position in NATO increased under President Obama and Secretary Clinton on January 29, 2015 when Obama announced a plan to create a genetic biobank with the help of the Czech Republic.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

2,870,997 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?
0:57

🚨BREAKING: RUSSIA TO DEPLOY NUCLEAR POWERED MISSLE | Threatens West With ‘Response’ Putin says Russia will deploy a nuclear powered missile ‘soon’. This comes after a successful test of a nuclear-powered and nuclear-capable cruise missile with a potential range of many thousands of miles. Putin also declined to rule out the possibility it could carry out weapons tests involving nuclear explosions for the first time in more than three decades. Today, Putin warned the West of a ‘response’ to the pressure, and his willingness to ‘end the war’: "There is permanently increasing military and political pressure [from the West]. We have to respond. I have said many times that it was not us who started the war in Ukraine. On the contrary, we are trying to end it." “The West has lost the sense of reality. Ukrainian conflict is not about territories. The issue is about global order.” Zelensky warned Europe that if Ukraine loses, Russia will attack other counties as well. Is Russia posturing again, as we’ve seen in the past, or is this not a bluff?

Mario Nawfal

10,998,688 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

President Trump says he and Putin talked about "de-nuclearizing" and that "there's no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons." "We were talking about de-nuking; president Putin and I agreed we are going to do it in a very big way. There's no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many you could destroy the world 50 times over, 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons and they're building nuclear weapons and China is building nuclear weapons and China is trying to catch up because you know, they're very substantially behind, but ithin five or six years they'll be even. And we're all spending a lot of money that we could be spending on other things that are actually hopefully much more productive. Hopefully there'll never be a time wren with -- when we need those weapons. If there's ever a time when we need nuclear weapon, the kind of weapons that we're building and Russia has and China has to a lesser extent but will have. That's going to be a very sad day. That's going to be probably oblivion."
1:00

President Trump says he and Putin talked about "de-nuclearizing" and that "there's no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons." "We were talking about de-nuking; president Putin and I agreed we are going to do it in a very big way. There's no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many you could destroy the world 50 times over, 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons and they're building nuclear weapons and China is building nuclear weapons and China is trying to catch up because you know, they're very substantially behind, but ithin five or six years they'll be even. And we're all spending a lot of money that we could be spending on other things that are actually hopefully much more productive. Hopefully there'll never be a time wren with -- when we need those weapons. If there's ever a time when we need nuclear weapon, the kind of weapons that we're building and Russia has and China has to a lesser extent but will have. That's going to be a very sad day. That's going to be probably oblivion."

Ken Klippenstein

684,374 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Pastor Erik Reed boldly putting an end to the "both sides" arguments we've seen from many Christians over the last few weeks and calling out the Democrats for being at war with "creational reality." "We are living in a world where there are two different visions for what kind of society we want to live in. And if Christ is not in the foundations of what we're doing with our vision for the future, if the Christian foundation and worldview that made our country great to begin with is not there, and everybody's just doing what's right in their own eyes, you can guarantee chaos will ensue. We are choosing between two distinct futures. They are not the same. Our two political parties in our country are not morally equivalent to each other... I am not baptizing the Republican Party. They did not come from Mount Sinai on high from God to say 'Thus saith the Lord.' But the current state of the Democratic Party, as they are...they are a party at war with creational realities every day. Creational realities. They are at war about what it means to be a man or a woman, about marriage, about sexuality, about who has the right to live in a womb. They are at war with life and prosperity. There is one side in particular with a progressive ideology that not only tried to suppress the story of the young woman in Charlotte, but who celebrated, both in the media and with college professors and many others, the death of a man whose beliefs they did not hold... And if you're more concerned with what I've just said in the last two or three minutes, about sounding partisan, than you are concerned about the reality of what's actually happening in our society right now, you have lost the plot."
1:57

Pastor Erik Reed boldly putting an end to the "both sides" arguments we've seen from many Christians over the last few weeks and calling out the Democrats for being at war with "creational reality." "We are living in a world where there are two different visions for what kind of society we want to live in. And if Christ is not in the foundations of what we're doing with our vision for the future, if the Christian foundation and worldview that made our country great to begin with is not there, and everybody's just doing what's right in their own eyes, you can guarantee chaos will ensue. We are choosing between two distinct futures. They are not the same. Our two political parties in our country are not morally equivalent to each other... I am not baptizing the Republican Party. They did not come from Mount Sinai on high from God to say 'Thus saith the Lord.' But the current state of the Democratic Party, as they are...they are a party at war with creational realities every day. Creational realities. They are at war about what it means to be a man or a woman, about marriage, about sexuality, about who has the right to live in a womb. They are at war with life and prosperity. There is one side in particular with a progressive ideology that not only tried to suppress the story of the young woman in Charlotte, but who celebrated, both in the media and with college professors and many others, the death of a man whose beliefs they did not hold... And if you're more concerned with what I've just said in the last two or three minutes, about sounding partisan, than you are concerned about the reality of what's actually happening in our society right now, you have lost the plot."

Center for Baptist Leadership

105,577 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Nuclear bombs are fake. 100% fiction. Japan surrendered because of Soviet invasion and their cities were fire bombed. Fact. Rods of god are not fake however. Satellites aren’t “orbiting” by falling forever around a spinning ball. That’s complete nonsense. They’re attached to balloons. NASA is the #1 consumer of helium. All of the world’s “space” presence is from balloons. Fallout radiation is the thing that always terrifies people about nuclear bombs. Which don’t exist. The concept is so stupid. But, 5G towers theoretically could mimic the symptoms of radiation poisoning in people after a rod hits something. That quantity and frequency obviously needs a massive and sustainable energy source. Ultra high frequency has a very short range. That’s why there are so many 5G towers every few blocks. It’s easy to get away from them. Keep an eye out for that move. The grabblers are really up to some sneaky schemes and tricks these days
2:58

Nuclear bombs are fake. 100% fiction. Japan surrendered because of Soviet invasion and their cities were fire bombed. Fact. Rods of god are not fake however. Satellites aren’t “orbiting” by falling forever around a spinning ball. That’s complete nonsense. They’re attached to balloons. NASA is the #1 consumer of helium. All of the world’s “space” presence is from balloons. Fallout radiation is the thing that always terrifies people about nuclear bombs. Which don’t exist. The concept is so stupid. But, 5G towers theoretically could mimic the symptoms of radiation poisoning in people after a rod hits something. That quantity and frequency obviously needs a massive and sustainable energy source. Ultra high frequency has a very short range. That’s why there are so many 5G towers every few blocks. It’s easy to get away from them. Keep an eye out for that move. The grabblers are really up to some sneaky schemes and tricks these days

Owen Benjamin 🐻

92,888 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The world has spent approximately $6–7 trillion cumulatively on wind turbines and solar panels. With that amount, we could have built up to 1,400 standard nuclear power plants (each with ~1–1.2 GW capacity, typical for modern large reactors). With proper maintenance, safety upgrades, and regulatory approvals, many nuclear plants last 60 years- 80 years or more. A typical wind or solar farm lasts about 20 years, meaning we would need to spend up to $21 trillion to produce the same energy as nuclear. With $21 trillion, the world could theoretically fund up to 4,000 nuclear power plants. Now lets talk about wind turbines. Without the Production Tax Credit (PTC), many wind farms were not economically viable from electricity sales alone, due to high upfront costs, intermittency (requiring backup power), and competition from cheaper sources like natural gas. The tax credits effectively offset a significant portion of costs—in some cases covering much or all of the investment for tax-liable entities—turning otherwise marginal or unprofitable projects into attractive ones. Are you seeing the scam? It's time to start building more nuclear and less of these green dream turbines and solar panels.
0:55

The world has spent approximately $6–7 trillion cumulatively on wind turbines and solar panels. With that amount, we could have built up to 1,400 standard nuclear power plants (each with ~1–1.2 GW capacity, typical for modern large reactors). With proper maintenance, safety upgrades, and regulatory approvals, many nuclear plants last 60 years- 80 years or more. A typical wind or solar farm lasts about 20 years, meaning we would need to spend up to $21 trillion to produce the same energy as nuclear. With $21 trillion, the world could theoretically fund up to 4,000 nuclear power plants. Now lets talk about wind turbines. Without the Production Tax Credit (PTC), many wind farms were not economically viable from electricity sales alone, due to high upfront costs, intermittency (requiring backup power), and competition from cheaper sources like natural gas. The tax credits effectively offset a significant portion of costs—in some cases covering much or all of the investment for tax-liable entities—turning otherwise marginal or unprofitable projects into attractive ones. Are you seeing the scam? It's time to start building more nuclear and less of these green dream turbines and solar panels.

John Lee Pettimore

120,600 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

New John Mearsheimer lecture on tactical nuclear weapons just dropped -- fascinating stuff. transcript from Grok Bot: "So it's just very important to understand that tactical nuclear weapons were seen for much of the 1950s as a magic weapon. Now, what happened to throw cold water on this whole line of thinking was a war game that was run in mid-June 1955. This is called Carte Blanche, and we had the situation where the Soviets would attack with conventional forces. We would use nuclear weapons, tactical nuclear weapons in response. And of course, the Soviets would use nuclear weapons of their own. Now, what happened in this war game, basically about 3,000 NATO aircraft from 11 different countries were employed in the war game. And about, I'd say, 335 nuclear weapons were employed. The usual range is 335 to 355. That's how many tactical nuclear weapons were employed in this war game. And by the way, the Russians, of course, employed nuclear weapons as well as the NATO forces in this war game. And in fact, the Russians or the Soviets ended up using or deploying or exploding more nuclear weapons, slightly more nuclear weapons than NATO did. But let's say the total was about 335 nuclear weapons. And the war was fought almost exclusively on West German soil. Now, what was the end result? The end result is that 1.7 million West Germans died and 3.5 million West Germans were wounded. Moreover, these numbers don't take into account the subsequent deaths that would occur as a result of the radiation poisoning. So you just want to think about that. You had a war game that went from June 20th to June 28th. This is 1955, the middle of the 50s, and it ended up with 1.7 million West Germans dead. What is this tell you? In effect, it tells you that you're destroying Germany to save Germany."
2:58

New John Mearsheimer lecture on tactical nuclear weapons just dropped -- fascinating stuff. transcript from Grok Bot: "So it's just very important to understand that tactical nuclear weapons were seen for much of the 1950s as a magic weapon. Now, what happened to throw cold water on this whole line of thinking was a war game that was run in mid-June 1955. This is called Carte Blanche, and we had the situation where the Soviets would attack with conventional forces. We would use nuclear weapons, tactical nuclear weapons in response. And of course, the Soviets would use nuclear weapons of their own. Now, what happened in this war game, basically about 3,000 NATO aircraft from 11 different countries were employed in the war game. And about, I'd say, 335 nuclear weapons were employed. The usual range is 335 to 355. That's how many tactical nuclear weapons were employed in this war game. And by the way, the Russians, of course, employed nuclear weapons as well as the NATO forces in this war game. And in fact, the Russians or the Soviets ended up using or deploying or exploding more nuclear weapons, slightly more nuclear weapons than NATO did. But let's say the total was about 335 nuclear weapons. And the war was fought almost exclusively on West German soil. Now, what was the end result? The end result is that 1.7 million West Germans died and 3.5 million West Germans were wounded. Moreover, these numbers don't take into account the subsequent deaths that would occur as a result of the radiation poisoning. So you just want to think about that. You had a war game that went from June 20th to June 28th. This is 1955, the middle of the 50s, and it ended up with 1.7 million West Germans dead. What is this tell you? In effect, it tells you that you're destroying Germany to save Germany."

@jason

55,179 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.
0:37

🚨NUCLEAR EXTINCTION: PUTIN HAS THREATENED ANNIHILATION IF A NUCLEAR STRIKE IS DETECTED Putin's recent statements on nuclear capabilities should be alarming to EVERYONE. He threatened ‘enemies’ with total nuclear annihilation, leaving 'no chance of survival' Putin emphasized that once Nuclear missile launches are detected, a massive retaliatory strike of HUNDREDS of Russian Nuclear missiles will be unleashed from various directions, ensuring that ‘no single enemy survives.’ In other words, any Nuclear strike from any NATO member could mean a simultaneous and total nuclear strike against all NATO nuclear powers, including the U.S. It's important to note that NATO has never threatened a first strike on Moscow. Recent reports suggested suspicions of a new test in the Arctic involving the Burevestnik, a super powerful missile with an onboard nuclear reactor. Putin also bragged about the successful testing of the 'Sarmat' or 'Satan-2,' an unstoppable ICBM that travels at 15,880 mph and is the size of a 14-storey tower block. He vowed to move towards mass production and combat duty deployment soon. When asked about resuming nuclear weapons testing, Putin remained non-committal, suggesting Russia could potentially revoke ratification of the international nuclear test ban treaty. MY THOUGHTS: The Ukraine war is complex. Russia is at fault, and denying this is ridiculous. This does NOT mean NATO is also not at fault, and it does not mean one cannot criticize the West for not doing enough to END the war. Voters, the media, and lawmakers, need to take steps in DE-ESCALATING this war rather than criticizing those who do so. I don’t want to sound alarming, but if this war gets out of control, the world is at risk of more destruction than both World Wars combined. Although slim, this is the closest we've been to such a position since the Cold War. Russia is known to bluff, and people like to compare this to the ‘Boy That Cried Wolf’. What those people forget is that eventually, the boy cried wolf and the wolf was actually there, killing the boy. This is a risk the world CANNOT AFFORD.

Mario Nawfal

6,904,744 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

The idea of NATO died in Ukraine. The Alliance was created to protect people, yet Ukrainians are now dying merely for the idea of a hypothetical accession sometime years from now. Maybe—if we do everything right and don’t die out before then. When people ask me what Ukraine can do to end the war, one answer is: stop lying to its own people, and stop setting unattainable maximalist goals in this war. Second: stop escalating the rhetoric. It’s easy to talk on camera about invincibility when you have a hundred bodyguards, a bunker against a nuclear strike, and can fly abroad whenever it’s useful or whenever you feel like it. This covers NATO, the 1991 borders, and how we will bomb Russia. And then—whoosh—into the bunker. Meanwhile the people swallow all of this, pick up arms and legs from everywhere, and pray every day for this hell to end. There is no diplomacy of threats. And this rhetoric is the first sign that the Ukrainian leader does not need peace. Third: stop stealing, because it weakens the nation in both war and peace. Corruption is our defeat. Fourth: repeal the decree banning negotiations with Putin. It makes any talks with him illegal. Waiting for Putin’s death is a cute idea—for a children’s comic. Because the math shows there will be no one left to wait. There are already almost 20 million of us, out of 52. Invincibility is only a political slogan. In the end, we are all human. Our bodies break, and now our souls are breaking too—from this damned war and from the authorities’ inhuman treatment. Ukraine needs peace. And Ukraine can still start doing something to achieve it.
1:21

The idea of NATO died in Ukraine. The Alliance was created to protect people, yet Ukrainians are now dying merely for the idea of a hypothetical accession sometime years from now. Maybe—if we do everything right and don’t die out before then. When people ask me what Ukraine can do to end the war, one answer is: stop lying to its own people, and stop setting unattainable maximalist goals in this war. Second: stop escalating the rhetoric. It’s easy to talk on camera about invincibility when you have a hundred bodyguards, a bunker against a nuclear strike, and can fly abroad whenever it’s useful or whenever you feel like it. This covers NATO, the 1991 borders, and how we will bomb Russia. And then—whoosh—into the bunker. Meanwhile the people swallow all of this, pick up arms and legs from everywhere, and pray every day for this hell to end. There is no diplomacy of threats. And this rhetoric is the first sign that the Ukrainian leader does not need peace. Third: stop stealing, because it weakens the nation in both war and peace. Corruption is our defeat. Fourth: repeal the decree banning negotiations with Putin. It makes any talks with him illegal. Waiting for Putin’s death is a cute idea—for a children’s comic. Because the math shows there will be no one left to wait. There are already almost 20 million of us, out of 52. Invincibility is only a political slogan. In the end, we are all human. Our bodies break, and now our souls are breaking too—from this damned war and from the authorities’ inhuman treatment. Ukraine needs peace. And Ukraine can still start doing something to achieve it.

Iuliia Mendel

56,041 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

‼️🇷🇺 Russia has always known that the US, UK, NATO planned a larger war against Russia. Ukraine was just the West's opening salvo. NATO from its inception is an anti-Russia military organization. Russia's FM Sergey Lavrov: "Europe does not hide its preparations for a new big war. For example, in July, France and Britain agreed to coordinate nuclear forces and created a "kind of Entente" to develop missile systems. At the same time, London and Berlin signed an agreement on military cooperation, and the other day they started talking about giving it a nuclear dimension." NATO's plans to intensify NATO in the Arctic are also cause for concern, and the alliance is also seeking to "stake out" a place for itself in the Pacific Ocean, its goal is deterrence China and the isolation of Russia: « "We have repeatedly said that we did not and do not have intentions to attack any of the current members of NATO and the European Union. We are ready to enshrine this position in future security guarantees for this part of Eurasia, but EU leaders are moving away from considering these future guarantees on a truly collective basis."
1:00

‼️🇷🇺 Russia has always known that the US, UK, NATO planned a larger war against Russia. Ukraine was just the West's opening salvo. NATO from its inception is an anti-Russia military organization. Russia's FM Sergey Lavrov: "Europe does not hide its preparations for a new big war. For example, in July, France and Britain agreed to coordinate nuclear forces and created a "kind of Entente" to develop missile systems. At the same time, London and Berlin signed an agreement on military cooperation, and the other day they started talking about giving it a nuclear dimension." NATO's plans to intensify NATO in the Arctic are also cause for concern, and the alliance is also seeking to "stake out" a place for itself in the Pacific Ocean, its goal is deterrence China and the isolation of Russia: « "We have repeatedly said that we did not and do not have intentions to attack any of the current members of NATO and the European Union. We are ready to enshrine this position in future security guarantees for this part of Eurasia, but EU leaders are moving away from considering these future guarantees on a truly collective basis."

⏳Towhee 🌏☮️

170,825 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Kevin O’Leary just said the quiet part out loud about what the Hormuz closure has confirmed about green energy: “It’s been practically USELESS in helping us at this point right now.” AOC and the climate alarmists are not going to like this one bit. O’LEARY: “The one thing about this commodity, it’s the input to EVERY sector of the economy.” “We have 11 sectors. Every single sector requires a reasonably priced energy source.” “And you know, we’ve talked a lot about alternative energy and new ideas and nuclear power.” “But this shock has proven to the world that oil still matters — not a some, it matters A LOT!” “And I expect policy around hydrocarbons to change dramatically everywhere in terms of securing a source of it at a price, sort of around the $70 range.” “So you’re going to see that happen and a lot less money going into alternatives.” “That may not be good or bad, depending on where you sit, but CLEARLY we didn’t buy any insurance investing billions of dollars in wind and solar.” “It’s been practically USELESS in helping us at this point right now.”
0:48

Kevin O’Leary just said the quiet part out loud about what the Hormuz closure has confirmed about green energy: “It’s been practically USELESS in helping us at this point right now.” AOC and the climate alarmists are not going to like this one bit. O’LEARY: “The one thing about this commodity, it’s the input to EVERY sector of the economy.” “We have 11 sectors. Every single sector requires a reasonably priced energy source.” “And you know, we’ve talked a lot about alternative energy and new ideas and nuclear power.” “But this shock has proven to the world that oil still matters — not a some, it matters A LOT!” “And I expect policy around hydrocarbons to change dramatically everywhere in terms of securing a source of it at a price, sort of around the $70 range.” “So you’re going to see that happen and a lot less money going into alternatives.” “That may not be good or bad, depending on where you sit, but CLEARLY we didn’t buy any insurance investing billions of dollars in wind and solar.” “It’s been practically USELESS in helping us at this point right now.”

Overton

155,234 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

☢️Trump will WALK AWAY from Iran War…but can Middle East nuclear proliferation be STOPPED? Afshin Rattansi: ‘How can the world disarm Israel of nuclear weapons then?’ Former Israeli Acting President Abraham Burg: ‘It’s not about disarming Israel, it’s about the entire region.’ Afshin: ‘Well, no one else has nuclear weapons, it’s just Israel that has them in this region. How can the world disarm them?’ Burg: ‘What started now does not end with this two-week ceasefire. There are so many genies out of the bottle now. And the motivation for nuclear power without America, because America under Trump will walk away like it ran away from so many other conflicts around the world in the last 20-some years, people will be motivated to have nuclear weapons. So there should be both a regional setting and global pressure to disable anybody who has nuclear capability, war nuclear capability, not to have it. Whatever guarantees are given to Iran, to the Saudis, to the Israelis, those guarantees should be very, very solid, very, very strong. But with one bottom line: the Middle East clean and clear of weapons of mass destruction. Can we have nuclear capabilities and nuclear reactors for energy? Yes. Should these nuclear energy centres be run together by Israelis and Saudis and Iranians and Egyptians and Emiratis? The answer is yes. The more cooperation we have on peacetime nuclear capability, the less threat we have with the warheads.’ Watch the full interview with Avraham Burg below in the replies👇
1:37

☢️Trump will WALK AWAY from Iran War…but can Middle East nuclear proliferation be STOPPED? Afshin Rattansi: ‘How can the world disarm Israel of nuclear weapons then?’ Former Israeli Acting President Abraham Burg: ‘It’s not about disarming Israel, it’s about the entire region.’ Afshin: ‘Well, no one else has nuclear weapons, it’s just Israel that has them in this region. How can the world disarm them?’ Burg: ‘What started now does not end with this two-week ceasefire. There are so many genies out of the bottle now. And the motivation for nuclear power without America, because America under Trump will walk away like it ran away from so many other conflicts around the world in the last 20-some years, people will be motivated to have nuclear weapons. So there should be both a regional setting and global pressure to disable anybody who has nuclear capability, war nuclear capability, not to have it. Whatever guarantees are given to Iran, to the Saudis, to the Israelis, those guarantees should be very, very solid, very, very strong. But with one bottom line: the Middle East clean and clear of weapons of mass destruction. Can we have nuclear capabilities and nuclear reactors for energy? Yes. Should these nuclear energy centres be run together by Israelis and Saudis and Iranians and Egyptians and Emiratis? The answer is yes. The more cooperation we have on peacetime nuclear capability, the less threat we have with the warheads.’ Watch the full interview with Avraham Burg below in the replies👇

Going Underground

33,475 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Israel Strikes Near Bushehr The reported Israeli bombing in the vicinity of the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant raises questions about Israel's objectives. The pattern of targeting critical infrastructure, from water desalination plants to areas close to sensitive nuclear sites, should serve as a strategic shock to the regional actors, especially GGC. These attacks have the potential to create a large scale existential threat to the Gulf region. A scenario comparable to the Chornobyl disaster is no longer unthinkable if strikes occur near nuclear facilities. Before any escalation, Qatar’s foreign minister warned explicitly about the consequences of targeting Bushehr. “Water supply for the whole region will be contaminated, and Qatar, Kuwait, and the UAE will run out of water within three days.” Given the scale of the potential humanitarian and environmental fallout, the absence of clearly defined rules of engagement around such sensitive infrastructure is deeply alarming. Sites adjacent to Nuclear plants are not conventional military sites. Their destruction or damage carries consequences that are indiscriminate and transnational. Israel, through these attacks, is threatening the Gulf to participate in a devastating war with Iran or is targeting Iran in a way that would lead to direct regional confrontation with the Gulf. The lack of serious public discourse around the radioactive risks is also concerning. In a worst case scenario, depending on wind direction, the radioactive contamination due to any attack on Busherh could extend as far as Pakistan, affecting coastal regions such as Karachi. Clips from Interview with Tucker Carlson
2:42

Israel Strikes Near Bushehr The reported Israeli bombing in the vicinity of the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant raises questions about Israel's objectives. The pattern of targeting critical infrastructure, from water desalination plants to areas close to sensitive nuclear sites, should serve as a strategic shock to the regional actors, especially GGC. These attacks have the potential to create a large scale existential threat to the Gulf region. A scenario comparable to the Chornobyl disaster is no longer unthinkable if strikes occur near nuclear facilities. Before any escalation, Qatar’s foreign minister warned explicitly about the consequences of targeting Bushehr. “Water supply for the whole region will be contaminated, and Qatar, Kuwait, and the UAE will run out of water within three days.” Given the scale of the potential humanitarian and environmental fallout, the absence of clearly defined rules of engagement around such sensitive infrastructure is deeply alarming. Sites adjacent to Nuclear plants are not conventional military sites. Their destruction or damage carries consequences that are indiscriminate and transnational. Israel, through these attacks, is threatening the Gulf to participate in a devastating war with Iran or is targeting Iran in a way that would lead to direct regional confrontation with the Gulf. The lack of serious public discourse around the radioactive risks is also concerning. In a worst case scenario, depending on wind direction, the radioactive contamination due to any attack on Busherh could extend as far as Pakistan, affecting coastal regions such as Karachi. Clips from Interview with Tucker Carlson

Talha Ahmad

67,811 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce