正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Nvidia could release a GLM 5.2 or better equivalent model any time it wants, and nuke OpenAI's margins 🤯

Marcelo P. Lima

29,828 subscribers

102,723 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I was skeptical about giving GLM-5.2 the task to build a super mario snes style game in a single HTML file so i ran the test on Opus and also on GLM-5.2 Opus didnt even try to make a game or made something but it wasn't a game GLM-5.2 one shotted a pretty functional game.. WILD

I was skeptical about giving GLM-5.2 the task to build a super mario snes style game in a single HTML file so i ran the test on Opus and also on GLM-5.2 Opus didnt even try to make a game or made something but it wasn't a game GLM-5.2 one shotted a pretty functional game.. WILD

Hermes Agent Tips

32,883 次观看 • 1 个月前

Sam Altman confirms: OpenAI is planning to release a very powerful open-source model. It could be "near the frontier" and better than any current open-source model out there.

Sam Altman confirms: OpenAI is planning to release a very powerful open-source model. It could be "near the frontier" and better than any current open-source model out there.

Haider.

169,375 次观看 • 1 年前

Introducing TogetherLink! An open source CLI to run any open source model inside your favorite coding harness. Run GLM 5.2 directly in Codex and Claude Code.

Introducing TogetherLink! An open source CLI to run any open source model inside your favorite coding harness. Run GLM 5.2 directly in Codex and Claude Code.

Hassan

34,537 次观看 • 1 个月前

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

we asked GLM 5.2 and Claude Opus 4.8 to find and fix the bugs in two different scripts while Opus 4.8 finished a few seconds faster in both tests, GLM 5.2 burned roughly 17k–38k fewer tokens and absolutely crushed it on cost, coming in 15x to 22x cheaper! Test 1: GLM 5.2 ($0.068) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.06) Test 2: GLM 5.2 ($0.045) vs. Opus 4.8 ($1.02)

GMI Cloud

86,444 次观看 • 1 个月前

GLM 5.2 is first chinese model that made 3d watch without any major mistakes 🤯 Z.ai you guys cooked very hard with this model , now only thing that we need is the big fat model , tell us the time when we can expect This is one of the hardest thing to one shot

GLM 5.2 is first chinese model that made 3d watch without any major mistakes 🤯 Z.ai you guys cooked very hard with this model , now only thing that we need is the big fat model , tell us the time when we can expect This is one of the hardest thing to one shot

Chetaslua

294,069 次观看 • 2 个月前

I used GLM-5.2 to optimize this visualization I previously made, and it doesn't feel like an open-source model at all. It's amazing.

I used GLM-5.2 to optimize this visualization I previously made, and it doesn't feel like an open-source model at all. It's amazing.

Joshua Guo

118,237 次观看 • 1 个月前

I’ve been using GLM 5.2 in Cursor with MagicPath and really like it so far. Cursor Settings → Models: Add your Fireworks key under “OpenAI API Key” and enable it Base URL: Model: accounts/fireworks/models/glm-5p2 Restart Cursor. Done.

I’ve been using GLM 5.2 in Cursor with MagicPath and really like it so far. Cursor Settings → Models: Add your Fireworks key under “OpenAI API Key” and enable it Base URL: Model: accounts/fireworks/models/glm-5p2 Restart Cursor. Done.

Pietro Schirano

36,538 次观看 • 1 个月前

We got attacked by secret unreleased proprietary models and defended ourselves with an open model, more precisely the NVIDIA quantized version of GLM 5.2 coming from Z.ai. Banning any open model would hurt first cyber security defenders, startups, small companies, researchers and everyone who's not a frontier lab and need on-prem affordable controlable models to compete and protect themselves. Let's not do that!

We got attacked by secret unreleased proprietary models and defended ourselves with an open model, more precisely the NVIDIA quantized version of GLM 5.2 coming from Z.ai. Banning any open model would hurt first cyber security defenders, startups, small companies, researchers and everyone who's not a frontier lab and need on-prem affordable controlable models to compete and protect themselves. Let's not do that!

clem 🤗

391,952 次观看 • 17 天前

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

GMI Cloud

150,679 次观看 • 1 个月前

I just tested GLM 5.2, Claude opus 4.8, and GPT 5.5 to see which one could rebuild my personal site in that whimsical ascii style GLM 5.2 held its own and went toe to toe with the other 2 top tier models lowkey impressed, look at the hero section it built here

I just tested GLM 5.2, Claude opus 4.8, and GPT 5.5 to see which one could rebuild my personal site in that whimsical ascii style GLM 5.2 held its own and went toe to toe with the other 2 top tier models lowkey impressed, look at the hero section it built here

Ann Nguyen

33,577 次观看 • 2 个月前

GLM-5.2 Nvidia NVFP4 No pruning, no quantising, exact same model card. 110 tok/s single stream. My friend is a genius, holy fudge. Here's the repo, he got full DS4-Flash on a 5090 + DDR5 at 38.5 tok/s This is a breakthrough.

GLM-5.2 Nvidia NVFP4 No pruning, no quantising, exact same model card. 110 tok/s single stream. My friend is a genius, holy fudge. Here's the repo, he got full DS4-Flash on a 5090 + DDR5 at 38.5 tok/s This is a breakthrough.

0xSero

156,978 次观看 • 1 个月前

NVIDIA just dropped free API keys for every top AI model You don't need your own GPU and you don't pay per token. GLM-5.2, MiniMax, Kimi, DeepSeek, OpenAI, all running on NVIDIA's servers, called through a normal API. Link: How to use one: 1. Create a free NVIDIA account. 2. Pick a Free Endpoint model and open its Build tab. You'll see ready-to-copy code with the base URL 3. Hit Generate API Key, copy it and paste that base URL and key into Claude Code, Cursor, or Cline. Bonus: NVIDIA also dropped 237 official skills that install into Claude Code and Codex in one command. Bookmark this.

NVIDIA just dropped free API keys for every top AI model You don't need your own GPU and you don't pay per token. GLM-5.2, MiniMax, Kimi, DeepSeek, OpenAI, all running on NVIDIA's servers, called through a normal API. Link: How to use one: 1. Create a free NVIDIA account. 2. Pick a Free Endpoint model and open its Build tab. You'll see ready-to-copy code with the base URL 3. Hit Generate API Key, copy it and paste that base URL and key into Claude Code, Cursor, or Cline. Bonus: NVIDIA also dropped 237 official skills that install into Claude Code and Codex in one command. Bookmark this.

Yarchi

62,979 次观看 • 1 个月前

NVIDIA is giving away free access to 140+ AI models for a full year > most people building AI agents are paying $50-200/month for API access NVIDIA just made that argument irrelevant models you get: GLM 5.2, MiniMax M3, Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B, Kimi K2.7, and 130+ more setup: > step 1 - get your free key > go to > register -> bind phone -> copy API key > step 2 - add to Hermes agent > open Settings -> Model Provider -> Custom base_url = " api_key = "nvapi-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" > step 3 - pick a model model = "z-ai/glm-5.2" model = "minimaxai/minimax-m3" model = "nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b" model = "moonshot-ai/kimi-k2.7" > Hermes already has NVIDIA set as default base_url > paste the key and you're running instantly > works the same in Cursor and OpenCode > cost: $0 > limit: 40 req/min > expires: 1 year while everyone is paying for API access, this is sitting there for free with this many models in one place, it is also the easiest way to test which one actually fits your agent before you commit to a paid provider

NVIDIA is giving away free access to 140+ AI models for a full year > most people building AI agents are paying $50-200/month for API access NVIDIA just made that argument irrelevant models you get: GLM 5.2, MiniMax M3, Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B, Kimi K2.7, and 130+ more setup: > step 1 - get your free key > go to > register -> bind phone -> copy API key > step 2 - add to Hermes agent > open Settings -> Model Provider -> Custom base_url = " api_key = "nvapi-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" > step 3 - pick a model model = "z-ai/glm-5.2" model = "minimaxai/minimax-m3" model = "nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b" model = "moonshot-ai/kimi-k2.7" > Hermes already has NVIDIA set as default base_url > paste the key and you're running instantly > works the same in Cursor and OpenCode > cost: $0 > limit: 40 req/min > expires: 1 year while everyone is paying for API access, this is sitting there for free with this many models in one place, it is also the easiest way to test which one actually fits your agent before you commit to a paid provider

Mr. Buzzoni

120,852 次观看 • 1 个月前

Ran two prompts in Kimi K2.7 Code HighSpeed, Kimi K2.7 Code, and GLM 5.2 HighSpeed is 2.5 to 4.2 times faster than Kimi K2.7 Code while producing comparable quality 4.5 to 15 times faster than GLM 5.2, and half the price (or less) These are simple tests, so the pricing difference is small and speed difference could diverge a lot But definitely a hell of a lot faster with good output

Ran two prompts in Kimi K2.7 Code HighSpeed, Kimi K2.7 Code, and GLM 5.2 HighSpeed is 2.5 to 4.2 times faster than Kimi K2.7 Code while producing comparable quality 4.5 to 15 times faster than GLM 5.2, and half the price (or less) These are simple tests, so the pricing difference is small and speed difference could diverge a lot But definitely a hell of a lot faster with good output

GMI Cloud

38,174 次观看 • 1 个月前

Grok 4.5 is first xAI model that win my heart 🫡 this is better then glm 5.2 and on par with current opus and gpt They cooked with the frontend too , like see this quality it made a website to showcase its benchmark and i asked it for water effects on background Elon Musk great job

Grok 4.5 is first xAI model that win my heart 🫡 this is better then glm 5.2 and on par with current opus and gpt They cooked with the frontend too , like see this quality it made a website to showcase its benchmark and i asked it for water effects on background Elon Musk great job

Chetaslua

49,068 次观看 • 1 个月前

GLM-5.2 is legit. It produces games easily and as accurately as SOTA closed-source models. My GLM 5.2 versus Fable 5 comparison is close, but I prefer Fable 5 just a little. Both games are equal in nearly all respects, but Fable 5 produced slightly better graphics and more challenging gameplay. Both needed 2 shots to get all the prompt instructions correct.

GLM-5.2 is legit. It produces games easily and as accurately as SOTA closed-source models. My GLM 5.2 versus Fable 5 comparison is close, but I prefer Fable 5 just a little. Both games are equal in nearly all respects, but Fable 5 produced slightly better graphics and more challenging gameplay. Both needed 2 shots to get all the prompt instructions correct.

David Hendrickson

18,779 次观看 • 1 个月前

First kinda working implementation of GLM 5.2 in DwarfStar. Will take some time to be good enough, but it is a promising start. 433 GB GGUF file. M3 Ultra 512GB.

First kinda working implementation of GLM 5.2 in DwarfStar. Will take some time to be good enough, but it is a promising start. 433 GB GGUF file. M3 Ultra 512GB.

antirez

69,508 次观看 • 1 个月前

Blender AI Real-Time Motion Capture Plugin — connect a 1080P camera or upload videos. It runs locally with a 1-billion-parameter model and requires 8GB of VRAM for real-time processing. It supports both real-time capture and video uploads. The full-parameter version currently supports NVIDIA CUDA and requires DX11 or higher.

Blender AI Real-Time Motion Capture Plugin — connect a 1080P camera or upload videos. It runs locally with a 1-billion-parameter model and requires 8GB of VRAM for real-time processing. It supports both real-time capture and video uploads. The full-parameter version currently supports NVIDIA CUDA and requires DX11 or higher.

CYANPUPPETS

54,124 次观看 • 5 个月前

Blender AI Real-Time Motion Capture Plugin — connect a 1080P camera or upload videos. It runs locally with a 1-billion-parameter model and requires 8GB of VRAM for real-time processing. It supports both real-time capture and video uploads. The full-parameter version currently supports NVIDIA CUDA and requires DX11 or higher.

Blender AI Real-Time Motion Capture Plugin — connect a 1080P camera or upload videos. It runs locally with a 1-billion-parameter model and requires 8GB of VRAM for real-time processing. It supports both real-time capture and video uploads. The full-parameter version currently supports NVIDIA CUDA and requires DX11 or higher.

CYANPUPPETS

26,492 次观看 • 6 个月前

Schedule release day?? Any time, any place.. Come and take it😴

Schedule release day?? Any time, any place.. Come and take it😴

Wartburg Express

12,633 次观看 • 3 年前