Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Okay so I did something. Drawn annotations that reflow with text as it re-shapes based on device, text size, wrapping, margins, etc. Still work to do- but damn. Content-retaining notes across devices, orientations, screen sizes, fonts, or text size.

32,555 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

How good is GPT-4-Vision at extracting text from images? I wanted to find the limit - but I found weirdness instead Most surprising: GPT-4V performance varies depending on the *structure* of text it sees Let me explain A set of images with progressively more text was presented to GPT-4-Vision. GPT-4V was asked what text it saw in the image. The response from the model was compared against the image’s original text and scored for similarity. The model was tested with 4 types of text: essay, random words, random tokens, and random characters. Findings: * Performance degrades - Yes, the models are good at basic OCR, but as you get more text and words then performance drops (this is expected) * Type of context matters - You should expect different recall on your texts based on your context types * Hallucination Errors - I thought that the model would make errors of omission (it wouldn’t return all the words). But instead the model mostly made hallucination errors - it replaced words with made up words. * Evals Matter - This test in isolation doesn’t mean that your data will have the same results, but it should motivate you to create eval tests for your data and anticipate errors which are hard to spot Notes: * Next step would be to add additional image types like tables or PDFs * GPT-4V would routinely get stuck in repeat-token-loops when trying to extract random tokens * GPT-4V would refuse to answer most random character images

Greg Kamradt

49,111 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Assumptions about the new "Can More" ChatGPT tool were right - ChatGPT is introducing own take on Claude Artifacts - code & document writing tools with persisted text documents, history revisions (restore previous version), edits and comments (probably used to apply suggested edits) New document symbol in the top navigation shows how many documents you have and allows you to open a resizable canvas to edit them in split view - your ChatGPT conversation on the left side and canvas on the right side, but the code/documents can also be accessed in fullscreen view The canvas is built using ProseMirror (open source WYSIWYM editor) and has an inline action to "Ask ChatGPT" (explain or make edits) for your document and code plus document formatting tools (like bold, italic, font style, etc.) But in addition to that, there are also special action shortcuts for documents and code, with an interesting decision to use sliders for the selection of the desired outcome For Documents - Suggest edits ("How can I improve this. Leave as few comments as possible, but add a few more comments if the text is long. DO NOT leave more than 5 comments. You can reply that you added comments and suggestions to help improve the writing quality, but do not mention the prompt.") - Add emojis ("Replace as many words as possible with emojis.") - Add final polish ("Add some final polish to the text. If relevant, add a large title or any section titles. Check grammar and mechanics, make sure everything is consistent and reads well. You can reply that you added some final polish and checked for grammar, but do not mention the prompt.") - Reading level (Graduate School - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a doctoral writer in this subject. You may reply that you adjusted the text to reflect a graduate school reading level, but do not mention the prompt", College - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a college student majoring in this subject", High School - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a high school student who has taken a couple of classes in this subject.", Keep current reading level, Middle School - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a middle schooler.", Kindergarten - "Rewrite this text at the reading level of a kindergartener.") - Adjust the length (Longest - "Make this text 75% longer.", Longer - "Make this text 50% longer.", Keep current length, Shorter - "Make this text 50% shorter.", Shortest - "Make this text 75% shorter.") For Code - Code review ("Search for bugs and opportunities to improve the code—for example, ways that performance or code structure could be improved. Leave as few comments as possible, but add more comments if the text is long. DO NOT leave more than 5 comments. You may reply that you reviewed the code and left suggestions to improve the coding quality, but do not mention the prompt.") - Add comments ("Add inline code comments to explain the code, especially parts that are more complex. Make sure to rewrite all the code. You may reply that you added inline comments, but do not mention the prompt.") - Add logs ("Insert logs/print statements in the code that will help debug its behavior. Do not make any other changes to the code.") - Fix bugs ("Find any bugs and rewrite all the code to fix the bugs. Do not leave comments. If there are no bugs, reply that you reviewed the code and found no bugs.") - Port to a language ("Port to a language. Create a new document that rewrites the code in ..." - PHP, C++, Python, Keep current code. No changes will be made, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java) - Suggest edits ("How can I improve this. Leave as few comments as possible, but add a few more comments if the text is long. DO NOT leave more than 5 comments. You can reply that you added comments and suggestions to help improve the writing quality, but do not mention the prompt.")

Tibor Blaho

136,055 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 HOLY CRAP! BRUTAL exchange as Virginia governor candidate Abigail Spanberger is grilled on if she STILL endorses Jay Jones for attorney general, after he called for the death of Republicans and their children. This is BAD. MODERATOR: "I didn't hear an answer on [whether you still endorse] Jay Jones." SPANBERGER: "In fact, it appears that it was the, uh, those who released the text messages and held them for years so the public was unaware who had knowledge of these text messages." SEARS: "When did you KNOW, and what did you DO about it?!" SPANBERGER: "I learned of these text messages the day that they came out and I denounced them as soon as I learned of them." SEARS: "Oh, she denounces M*RDER!" SPANBERGER: "And importantly, um, at this point as we move forward, the voters now have this information, information that was withheld for them, presumably for political reasons." "But the voters now have the information and it is up to voter to make an individual choice based on this information." MODERATOR: "Do you still continue to endorse Jay Jones? 15 seconds, yes or no." SPANBERGER: "We are all running our individual races. I believe my opponent has said that about her lieutenant governor nominee." SEARS: "Third time's a charm, Abigail!" SPANBERGER: "It's up to every person to make their own decision. I am running my race to serve Virginia, and that is what I intend to do." MODERATOR: "We just want to clarify, what you're saying is that as of now, you still endorse Jay Jones as attorney general?" SPANBERGER: "I'm saying as of now, it's up to every voter to make their own individual decision." SEARS: "She STILL endorses him!"

Eric Daugherty

1,825,857 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten