Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Okay... this is actually insane. OpenCodex feels like the open-source breakthrough I've been waiting for. The best part : You can plug multiple providers into the same OpenAI Codex harness and switch between models depending on the task. Running low on tokens? No problem. Use another provider. OpenRouter free... show more

CHOI

12,616 subscribers

42,894 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Cline Desktop just launched. An open-source workspace for open-weight models 🤯 > Import tasks from other coding agents > Run agents in parallel > Schedule tasks to run on their own Free models built in: DeepSeek V4 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash, Laguna S 2.1. I had early access and I can assure you it feels incredible. Pick your model and provider, and run it. 100% open source.

Cline Desktop just launched. An open-source workspace for open-weight models 🤯 > Import tasks from other coding agents > Run agents in parallel > Schedule tasks to run on their own Free models built in: DeepSeek V4 Flash, GLM 5.3 Flash, Laguna S 2.1. I had early access and I can assure you it feels incredible. Pick your model and provider, and run it. 100% open source.

Alvaro Cintas

15,934 views • 1 month ago

We are launching Open Dots, run the same capabilities in 1/10th of the cost OpenAI shipped Dot yesterday for Pro users. Ours is open source, runs on your Mac and cheaper Here's how it works: - each dot has its own browser that stays logged in securely - it can use and setup triggers on your Gmail, Calendar and 1,500 other apps - you can call it and give it things to do while you talk - dots can coordinate and schedule reminders built with Composio OpenRouter free and open source:

We are launching Open Dots, run the same capabilities in 1/10th of the cost OpenAI shipped Dot yesterday for Pro users. Ours is open source, runs on your Mac and cheaper Here's how it works: - each dot has its own browser that stays logged in securely - it can use and setup triggers on your Gmail, Calendar and 1,500 other apps - you can call it and give it things to do while you talk - dots can coordinate and schedule reminders built with Composio OpenRouter free and open source:

Karan Vaidya

239,752 views • 1 month ago

Fixing plastic AI generated skin is a $100k/month problem. Apps like Enhancor AI use open-source models and ComfyUI workflows as a backend. How do I know this? I built a workflow that clones their core feature and I'm dropping it below for FREE. Same results, no subscriptions. Use it yourself OR build your own app around it. Why pay for open-source tools? 🧵

Fixing plastic AI generated skin is a $100k/month problem. Apps like Enhancor AI use open-source models and ComfyUI workflows as a backend. How do I know this? I built a workflow that clones their core feature and I'm dropping it below for FREE. Same results, no subscriptions. Use it yourself OR build your own app around it. Why pay for open-source tools? 🧵

rob - comfyui

75,152 views • 1 year ago

New open-source agent harness just landed! I got early access to TrueForge by TrueFoundry and have been running it locally for the past few days. The harness layer deserves as much attention as the model, and open source matters here because you can inspect the loop, run it on your own infrastructure, and swap to the latest or cheaper models. TrueForge handles the runtime work that makes an agent reliable. It drives the tool-calling loop, manages context, coordinates subagents, and executes code in a sandbox, with any model you choose. Every tool call re-sends the growing context to the model, so in practice the harness controls most of what an agent costs to run. A few things stood out from my testing and their published benchmarks. Vendor-Neutral by design. It runs OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google models alongside open-weight models like Kimi, GLM, and DeepSeek. Model routing is a setting, and you can send each task to the model that fits it. On a 14-task enterprise agent benchmark, it matched the accuracy of Claude Managed Agents running the same Opus 4.8 model at roughly 30% lower cost per run (3.8M tokens vs 10M for the same answers). Routing the same tasks to GLM-5.2 held accuracy and brought cost down by about 75%, around $3 per run instead of $12. Fully self-hosted and Open Source (MIT License). I had it running locally with one command, with sandboxed code execution working out of the box. It's time to own your agent harness. Thanks to TrueFoundry for partnering on this post.

New open-source agent harness just landed! I got early access to TrueForge by TrueFoundry and have been running it locally for the past few days. The harness layer deserves as much attention as the model, and open source matters here because you can inspect the loop, run it on your own infrastructure, and swap to the latest or cheaper models. TrueForge handles the runtime work that makes an agent reliable. It drives the tool-calling loop, manages context, coordinates subagents, and executes code in a sandbox, with any model you choose. Every tool call re-sends the growing context to the model, so in practice the harness controls most of what an agent costs to run. A few things stood out from my testing and their published benchmarks. Vendor-Neutral by design. It runs OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google models alongside open-weight models like Kimi, GLM, and DeepSeek. Model routing is a setting, and you can send each task to the model that fits it. On a 14-task enterprise agent benchmark, it matched the accuracy of Claude Managed Agents running the same Opus 4.8 model at roughly 30% lower cost per run (3.8M tokens vs 10M for the same answers). Routing the same tasks to GLM-5.2 held accuracy and brought cost down by about 75%, around $3 per run instead of $12. Fully self-hosted and Open Source (MIT License). I had it running locally with one command, with sandboxed code execution working out of the box. It's time to own your agent harness. Thanks to TrueFoundry for partnering on this post.

elvis

11,303 views • 2 months ago

It's over. OpenAI just crushed it. We have their o3-level open-source model running on GroqInc at 500 tokens per second. Watch it build an entire SaaS app in just a few seconds. This is the new standard. Why the hell would you use anything else??

It's over. OpenAI just crushed it. We have their o3-level open-source model running on GroqInc at 500 tokens per second. Watch it build an entire SaaS app in just a few seconds. This is the new standard. Why the hell would you use anything else??

Matt Shumer

498,828 views • 1 year ago

Something just launched that makes VS Code feel ancient. And im all in for it: Cline Desktop app, an open-source app for open-weight models (and you know how much i love open source) brings its coding agent into a standalone Cline Desktop app for Mac + Windows. Just open a project and tell it what you want to change. No need to open VS Code first. In Cline's demo, it adds priority filters to a task board, works through the code and runs the build. Glad to see the model choice stays open, too. You can bring your own API keys, use supported open-weight models and even switch models halfway through a project!

Something just launched that makes VS Code feel ancient. And im all in for it: Cline Desktop app, an open-source app for open-weight models (and you know how much i love open source) brings its coding agent into a standalone Cline Desktop app for Mac + Windows. Just open a project and tell it what you want to change. No need to open VS Code first. In Cline's demo, it adds priority filters to a task board, works through the code and runs the build. Glad to see the model choice stays open, too. You can bring your own API keys, use supported open-weight models and even switch models halfway through a project!

Chubby♨️

40,292 views • 1 month ago

Little preview of something I've been working on! You can connect to any provider, or through any harness like Hermes Agent, and the setup is instant with no configuration required, unless you want to. Proactive, self-aware, and will be fully open source

Little preview of something I've been working on! You can connect to any provider, or through any harness like Hermes Agent, and the setup is instant with no configuration required, unless you want to. Proactive, self-aware, and will be fully open source

Brooklyn!

229,093 views • 18 days ago

Monitor and control your AI spend on every provider on Our early users save 40% on average. Every week, the price-intelligence-latency frontier shifts, and we expect this trend to continue. Tradeoffs between latency, reasoning, cost, service tier, open source and closed source models are shifting constantly. Router sends every request to the model that's actually best for the task and helps you control what tokens you buy. We benchmark it against real work: ~40% lower cost for the same outputs. Today we're opening it to everyone. Two lines of code or just change your base URL. No Ramp account needed. Free through 2026, first $26 on us. Get an API key today at

Monitor and control your AI spend on every provider on Our early users save 40% on average. Every week, the price-intelligence-latency frontier shifts, and we expect this trend to continue. Tradeoffs between latency, reasoning, cost, service tier, open source and closed source models are shifting constantly. Router sends every request to the model that's actually best for the task and helps you control what tokens you buy. We benchmark it against real work: ~40% lower cost for the same outputs. Today we're opening it to everyone. Two lines of code or just change your base URL. No Ramp account needed. Free through 2026, first $26 on us. Get an API key today at

Veeral Patel

1,432,108 views • 2 months ago

🚨 one of the sharpest image to 3D models just went open source Hi3D V1.0 , this is Sparc3D from last year scaled up , code + weights now on GitHub / HF and it’s completely free to download and use , honestly the most interesting open 3D drop i’ve seen in a while i threw 4 of my own images at it , goku / charizard / the new roadster / the pelican on a bike Try it free Hi3D

🚨 one of the sharpest image to 3D models just went open source Hi3D V1.0 , this is Sparc3D from last year scaled up , code + weights now on GitHub / HF and it’s completely free to download and use , honestly the most interesting open 3D drop i’ve seen in a while i threw 4 of my own images at it , goku / charizard / the new roadster / the pelican on a bike Try it free Hi3D

Chetaslua

44,493 views • 18 days ago

Big win for open-source LLMs! DeepSeek V4 Pro holds the top open-weights score on SWE-bench Verified, in the GPT-5.5 range. GLM 5.2 leads the open-weight intelligence index and sits near the closed frontier on long-horizon coding. But this leaderboard number is a weak proxy for real performance. It comes from one task set, run through one harness, served at one precision. The same weights can even score differently across providers, since many hosts quantize activations to fp8 and drift the model off its reference weights. Real performance is determined based on whether a model can read a repo, make coordinated edits across files, run the tests, and recover when one breaks. By that measure, the top open models hold up, but only inside the right harness. The teams that actually put DeepSeek V4 into production pipelines as a frontier substitute got there through the harness they built around the model, not by picking a stronger model. If you want to see this in practice, Cline (64k+ stars) has actually built that harness around open models, tuned so they run at production quality. And it's tuned so that these LLMs can run at production quality, with plan and act modes, checkpoints, and terminal feedback. ClinePass is the new access layer on top of it. It runs a curated set of those models inside Cline, narrowed to the ones tested for coding-agent use, with 2 to 5x the standard rate limits and no separate provider accounts, keys, or billing to track. The video below shows the setup, and I worked with the team to put this together. It runs alongside custom keys and local models as well, not in place of them.

Big win for open-source LLMs! DeepSeek V4 Pro holds the top open-weights score on SWE-bench Verified, in the GPT-5.5 range. GLM 5.2 leads the open-weight intelligence index and sits near the closed frontier on long-horizon coding. But this leaderboard number is a weak proxy for real performance. It comes from one task set, run through one harness, served at one precision. The same weights can even score differently across providers, since many hosts quantize activations to fp8 and drift the model off its reference weights. Real performance is determined based on whether a model can read a repo, make coordinated edits across files, run the tests, and recover when one breaks. By that measure, the top open models hold up, but only inside the right harness. The teams that actually put DeepSeek V4 into production pipelines as a frontier substitute got there through the harness they built around the model, not by picking a stronger model. If you want to see this in practice, Cline (64k+ stars) has actually built that harness around open models, tuned so they run at production quality. And it's tuned so that these LLMs can run at production quality, with plan and act modes, checkpoints, and terminal feedback. ClinePass is the new access layer on top of it. It runs a curated set of those models inside Cline, narrowed to the ones tested for coding-agent use, with 2 to 5x the standard rate limits and no separate provider accounts, keys, or billing to track. The video below shows the setup, and I worked with the team to put this together. It runs alongside custom keys and local models as well, not in place of them.

Avi Chawla

44,124 views • 4 months ago

This free model just beat every closed-source AI on coding benchmarks. Open weights. 6x cheaper than Opus. The labs don't want you to know it exists. > GLM-5.2 from Zai just topped Code Arena - the first open-weights model to ever hold the #1 coding spot. Not a leaked weight, not a fine-tune. A fully open model beating GPT and Claude on their own turf. It's live on Hugging Face Inference API right now. 5 providers: Novita, Together AI, Fireworks, Deepinfra, Zai. OpenAI-compatible client. → Go to huggingface(.)co → grab HF_TOKEN from account settings → plug into any OpenAI-compatible client 6x cheaper than Opus. Companies bleeding on AI bills are already routing to this for orchestration, caching, and token optimization. The smart money moved before the headline dropped. > Now you know. huggingface(.)co/zai-org/GLM-5.2 Bookmark this before everyone else figures it out.

This free model just beat every closed-source AI on coding benchmarks. Open weights. 6x cheaper than Opus. The labs don't want you to know it exists. > GLM-5.2 from Zai just topped Code Arena - the first open-weights model to ever hold the #1 coding spot. Not a leaked weight, not a fine-tune. A fully open model beating GPT and Claude on their own turf. It's live on Hugging Face Inference API right now. 5 providers: Novita, Together AI, Fireworks, Deepinfra, Zai. OpenAI-compatible client. → Go to huggingface(.)co → grab HF_TOKEN from account settings → plug into any OpenAI-compatible client 6x cheaper than Opus. Companies bleeding on AI bills are already routing to this for orchestration, caching, and token optimization. The smart money moved before the headline dropped. > Now you know. huggingface(.)co/zai-org/GLM-5.2 Bookmark this before everyone else figures it out.

Atenov int.

12,395 views • 4 months ago

Buzz by Jack Dorsey just killed Slack. 100% free and open-source Slack alternative powered by AI agents. Bring your own agents; free desktop app included. I think we're about to see a LOT more open-source projects like this start to launch. Ultimately, the best asset a business can have in the AI era is data, and open-source projects give companies complete oversight over their own internal data. Genius launch →

Buzz by Jack Dorsey just killed Slack. 100% free and open-source Slack alternative powered by AI agents. Bring your own agents; free desktop app included. I think we're about to see a LOT more open-source projects like this start to launch. Ultimately, the best asset a business can have in the AI era is data, and open-source projects give companies complete oversight over their own internal data. Genius launch →

Miles Deutscher

40,031 views • 3 months ago

I think one of the biggest problems with AI agents right now is how much control we give up just to use them. Most AI agent platforms want you to work inside their ecosystem, use their preferred models, and trust them with your files and data. That might be convenient, but I don't think it should be the only option. I recently came across PilotDeck, and I found its approach pretty interesting. It's an open-source AI agent workspace developed by Tsinghua University's THUNLP, ModelBest, OpenBMB, and AI9Stars. The idea is simple: instead of being tied to one AI provider, you should have more freedom to decide how your agent works. And there are a few things worth looking at here. First, model independence. Most people focus on which AI model is the smartest, but I think having the freedom to choose your model is equally important. PilotDeck supports different model providers and configurable API endpoints. This means you're not necessarily stuck with one company's models. You can choose a setup based on your budget, performance needs, or the type of task you're working on. For developers who regularly experiment with different AI models, I think that's a pretty useful approach. Second, privacy and control over your workspace. This is probably the part that interests me the most. AI agents are increasingly being used to handle research papers, financial documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and other personal or business files. And once you start giving an agent access to that kind of information, where your files are processed becomes an important question. PilotDeck supports local workspaces and offers options for local or private deployment. That gives users more flexibility over how their environment is configured, rather than relying entirely on a closed platform. Of course, privacy still depends on which model provider and API you connect. Using a local workspace doesn't automatically mean your data never leaves your device. But having the option to control the setup is a meaningful difference. Third, it's designed to actually complete work. Another thing I like about the approach is that PilotDeck isn't just trying to be another chatbot. It's built around an agent workflow where you describe a task, the system plans the steps, works with files, uses tools, and produces an output you can still edit. For example, imagine giving an AI agent multiple research documents and asking it to organize the information into an Excel spreadsheet and prepare a PowerPoint presentation. Instead of getting a long text response that you need to manually copy into different applications, the goal is to have the agent handle the workflow and deliver usable files. It also supports task history, result previews, switching models, and changing instructions while a task is running. I think this is where AI agents become more practical for everyday work. And finally, there's the open-source aspect. Personally, I think we're going to see more demand for AI tools that don't force users into one vendor's ecosystem. Models are improving quickly, and the best option today might not be the best option six months from now. Having an agent workspace that can work with different models makes a lot more sense to me than rebuilding your entire workflow every time you want to switch providers. There are still things I'd want to test properly, especially how reliable it is on longer tasks, how easy the setup is for non-technical users, and what the actual privacy trade-offs are with different model configurations. But I like the direction PilotDeck is taking. I don't think the future of AI agents should be about which company controls your entire workflow. It should be about how much control you have over the tools doing the work. And that's why I think open-source, model-independent projects like PilotDeck are worth paying attention to. If you're interested in building AI workflows with more flexibility, check it out. Website: GitHub:

I think one of the biggest problems with AI agents right now is how much control we give up just to use them. Most AI agent platforms want you to work inside their ecosystem, use their preferred models, and trust them with your files and data. That might be convenient, but I don't think it should be the only option. I recently came across PilotDeck, and I found its approach pretty interesting. It's an open-source AI agent workspace developed by Tsinghua University's THUNLP, ModelBest, OpenBMB, and AI9Stars. The idea is simple: instead of being tied to one AI provider, you should have more freedom to decide how your agent works. And there are a few things worth looking at here. First, model independence. Most people focus on which AI model is the smartest, but I think having the freedom to choose your model is equally important. PilotDeck supports different model providers and configurable API endpoints. This means you're not necessarily stuck with one company's models. You can choose a setup based on your budget, performance needs, or the type of task you're working on. For developers who regularly experiment with different AI models, I think that's a pretty useful approach. Second, privacy and control over your workspace. This is probably the part that interests me the most. AI agents are increasingly being used to handle research papers, financial documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and other personal or business files. And once you start giving an agent access to that kind of information, where your files are processed becomes an important question. PilotDeck supports local workspaces and offers options for local or private deployment. That gives users more flexibility over how their environment is configured, rather than relying entirely on a closed platform. Of course, privacy still depends on which model provider and API you connect. Using a local workspace doesn't automatically mean your data never leaves your device. But having the option to control the setup is a meaningful difference. Third, it's designed to actually complete work. Another thing I like about the approach is that PilotDeck isn't just trying to be another chatbot. It's built around an agent workflow where you describe a task, the system plans the steps, works with files, uses tools, and produces an output you can still edit. For example, imagine giving an AI agent multiple research documents and asking it to organize the information into an Excel spreadsheet and prepare a PowerPoint presentation. Instead of getting a long text response that you need to manually copy into different applications, the goal is to have the agent handle the workflow and deliver usable files. It also supports task history, result previews, switching models, and changing instructions while a task is running. I think this is where AI agents become more practical for everyday work. And finally, there's the open-source aspect. Personally, I think we're going to see more demand for AI tools that don't force users into one vendor's ecosystem. Models are improving quickly, and the best option today might not be the best option six months from now. Having an agent workspace that can work with different models makes a lot more sense to me than rebuilding your entire workflow every time you want to switch providers. There are still things I'd want to test properly, especially how reliable it is on longer tasks, how easy the setup is for non-technical users, and what the actual privacy trade-offs are with different model configurations. But I like the direction PilotDeck is taking. I don't think the future of AI agents should be about which company controls your entire workflow. It should be about how much control you have over the tools doing the work. And that's why I think open-source, model-independent projects like PilotDeck are worth paying attention to. If you're interested in building AI workflows with more flexibility, check it out. Website: GitHub:

Sally Stockholm

13,794 views • 28 days ago

Take your time to explore Sentient GRID, the largest open-source intelligence network and the backbone that makes open AI actually scale. The GRID is real infrastructure, designed to make open-source AI viable for the long run. Here’s what sets it apart from others: ➩ Anyone can build and launch AI tools. ➩ Everything is transparent—you can see how it works. ➩ Shared resources speed up innovation. You can try it yourself: ➩ Sentient Chat → ➩ The GRID → Right now, most AI is locked behind big corporations. They own the models, the data, and the power. Sentient changes that by building a system where AI belongs to everyone: builders, users, and communities. Whether you’re here to build, invest, or just use AI tools, Sentient gives you the chance to be part of the upside of this shift. gSent!

Take your time to explore Sentient GRID, the largest open-source intelligence network and the backbone that makes open AI actually scale. The GRID is real infrastructure, designed to make open-source AI viable for the long run. Here’s what sets it apart from others: ➩ Anyone can build and launch AI tools. ➩ Everything is transparent—you can see how it works. ➩ Shared resources speed up innovation. You can try it yourself: ➩ Sentient Chat → ➩ The GRID → Right now, most AI is locked behind big corporations. They own the models, the data, and the power. Sentient changes that by building a system where AI belongs to everyone: builders, users, and communities. Whether you’re here to build, invest, or just use AI tools, Sentient gives you the chance to be part of the upside of this shift. gSent!

Sir Khaycee

10,267 views • 1 year ago

launching a free and open source granola alternative it's the 2137th open source granola alternative, except this one works and looks good. i made this out of curiosity, following the trend of replacing saas with free software, wanted to see how hard would be to actually rebuild an app. setup includes: • BYO OpenAI + AssemblyAI • BYO R2 storage (optional) next i want to make it easier to add your own db + launch an iPhone app. hmu with features you'd like to add!

launching a free and open source granola alternative it's the 2137th open source granola alternative, except this one works and looks good. i made this out of curiosity, following the trend of replacing saas with free software, wanted to see how hard would be to actually rebuild an app. setup includes: • BYO OpenAI + AssemblyAI • BYO R2 storage (optional) next i want to make it easier to add your own db + launch an iPhone app. hmu with features you'd like to add!

kyzo

18,783 views • 2 months ago

We're excited to introduce Ocelot, an open-source and Brave-trained AI model built specifically to summarize web content. Ocelot is now available in Leo, our browser's AI assistant, and as an open-source model for the developer community.

We're excited to introduce Ocelot, an open-source and Brave-trained AI model built specifically to summarize web content. Ocelot is now available in Leo, our browser's AI assistant, and as an open-source model for the developer community.

Brave

101,075 views • 6 months ago