正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

ONI's Section Two subdivision deals with public communications and propaganda, boosting public morale during wartime through measures such as ONI Directive 930, stating that Spartans must not be recorded as KIA—only missing or wounded in action. #FictionFriday

35,928 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇬🇧 As a UK lawyer addressing the Prime Minister's inaction towards armed gangs running the streets, it's important to evaluate the legal framework and the Prime Minister's obligations under the law 🇬🇧 UK Legal Obligations and Potential Offences of the Prime Minister 🇬🇧 1. Dereliction of Duty. The Prime Minister, as the head of the government, has a duty to uphold the law and ensure the safety of the public. Ignoring armed gangs and dismissing public concerns could be seen as a failure to fulfil this duty, potentially amounting to dereliction of duty. 2. Misconduct in Public Office. The common law offence of misconduct in public office applies when a public official willfully neglects to perform their duties or acts in a way that amounts to an abuse of the public's trust. Ignoring violent gangs and accusing the public of racism for their concerns could be interpreted as such misconduct. 3. Negligence. Under civil law, negligence occurs when someone fails to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury or loss to another person. The Prime Minister's inaction could be seen as a form of negligence if it can be shown that it has led to harm or risk to the public. 4. Breach of the Human Rights Act 1998. The European Convention on Human Rights, incorporated into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998, protects individuals' rights to life (Article 2) and security (Article 5). The state's failure to address violent gangs could be seen as a breach of these rights, especially if the violence results in harm to individuals. 5. Incitement to Racial Hatred. While the Prime Minister is accusing the public of racism and far right extremism, it's crucial to ensure that his statements do not incite racial hatred, which is an offence under the Public Order Act 1986. However, this is more about ensuring balanced rhetoric rather than an offence the Prime Minister himself might be committing. Potential Offences Committed by the Armed Muslim gangs. 1. Possession of Firearms and Offensive Weapons. Under the Firearms Act 1968 and the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, carrying firearms and other weapons in public without a license is a serious offence. 2. Public Order Offences. Their actions likely violate the Public Order Act 1986, prohibiting behaviour that causes harassment, alarm, or distress. 3. Terrorism Offences Chanting extremist slogans while armed could fall under the Terrorism Act 2000, which includes the glorification of terrorism and inciting violence. 4. Incitement to Violence. Encouraging violent acts is a criminal offence under the Serious Crime Act 2007. 5. Affray. Engaging in behaviour causing others to fear for their safety violates the Public Order Act 1986. 6. Trespassing and Damage to Property Likely offences under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 if they are trespassing and causing property damage. 7. Conspiracy to Commit Offences. Organizing and participating in coordinated attacks is a conspiracy to commit multiple offences, punishable under the Criminal Law Act 1977. Conclusion The Prime Minister's inaction in the face of such blatant lawlessness is deeply troubling. It could be construed as misconduct in public office or even negligence, given the duty to protect the public and uphold the law. Moreover, the public's concerns are legitimate and should be addressed with due seriousness, not dismissed as racist or far right extremism. This is a critical issue requiring immediate and effective action to maintain public order and trust in the government. Share,like,follow and comment for your opinion to be heard. 🇬🇧

Marx Anthony

369,415 次观看 • 1 年前

>Hezbollah continues their rapid pace of attacks. Four more in the last 30 minutes. >Reports of occupation army evacuation helicopters spotted leaving Lebanon. >United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) have been informed that, effective from 1400 UTC on 13 April 2026, maritime access restrictions are being enforced affecting Iranian ports and coastal areas, including locations along the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, and the Arabian Sea east of the Strait of Hormuz. These access restrictions apply without distinction to vessels of any flag engaging with Iranian ports, oil terminals, or coastal facilities. UKMTO understands that formal details of these measures, including enforcement provisions and exemptions, will be promulgated and updated through official Notice to Mariners (NTM). Based on information currently available to UKMTO: • The restrictions encompass the entirety of the Iranian coastline, including ports and energy infrastructure. • Transit passage through the Strait of Hormuz to or from non-Iranian destinations is not reported to be impeded by these measures; however, vessels may encounter military presence, directed communications, or right-of-visit procedures during passage. • Neutral vessels currently within Iranian ports have been granted a limited grace period to depart, as will be specified in the NTM. Additional guidelines for mariners regarding how these measures will be applied in practice, including routing, verification, and authorised transit procedures are in development. Further clarification is expected to be provided through subsequent advisories as information becomes available.

barry with the NED

11,968 次观看 • 3 个月前