正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Opus 4.6 vs. Minimax M2.5 Prompt: Build an interactive solar system from scratch. Opus 4.6 tried to create a beautiful UI, but the sun’s shadow ruined it. Minimax M2.5 built a simple version that works beautifully. The winner is: 🥇 Minimax M2.5 🥈 Opus 4.6

Okara

67,885 subscribers

80,558 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术教育科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

MiniMax M2.5 > Claude Opus 4.6 I have been using it for a couple of days and have never hit the limit. I am currently on the Coding Plus plan which gives me 300 prompts per 5 hours. My new setup is OpenCode + MiniMax M2.5 What I have noticed: M2.5 – handles multi-step coding workflows and repo-level reasoning more reliably – better at chaining actions. think: generate test, fix bug, refactor, repeat – high TPS throughput M2.5 hits ~80%+ on SWE-Bench coding benchmarks on par with Opus and runs these tasks 37% faster than its predecessor while costing ~1/10th - 1/20th the price. Check out the video.

MiniMax M2.5 > Claude Opus 4.6 I have been using it for a couple of days and have never hit the limit. I am currently on the Coding Plus plan which gives me 300 prompts per 5 hours. My new setup is OpenCode + MiniMax M2.5 What I have noticed: M2.5 – handles multi-step coding workflows and repo-level reasoning more reliably – better at chaining actions. think: generate test, fix bug, refactor, repeat – high TPS throughput M2.5 hits ~80%+ on SWE-Bench coding benchmarks on par with Opus and runs these tasks 37% faster than its predecessor while costing ~1/10th - 1/20th the price. Check out the video.

Pratham

184,716 次观看 • 5 个月前

Happycapy is now open to everyone 🚀 The agent-native computer, in your browser, and now on your phone. > Powered by Claude Code + MiniMax, including Opus 4.6 and Minimax M2.5 > Your own secure cloud sandbox > Run agent teams. Automate task Not just another OpenClaw. It’s all-in-one. No installs. Just run.

Happycapy is now open to everyone 🚀 The agent-native computer, in your browser, and now on your phone. > Powered by Claude Code + MiniMax, including Opus 4.6 and Minimax M2.5 > Your own secure cloud sandbox > Run agent teams. Automate task Not just another OpenClaw. It’s all-in-one. No installs. Just run.

Jarod Xu

1,105,679 次观看 • 6 个月前

kimi k2.5 vs minimax m2.5 someone in the comments asked me to compare the minimax m2.5 output with kimi k2.5 so i gave the same prompt to both. minimax built it the fastest, while the kimi k2.5 agent took 1–2 hours, but i liked the scroll animations it came up with. honestly, both cooked.

kimi k2.5 vs minimax m2.5 someone in the comments asked me to compare the minimax m2.5 output with kimi k2.5 so i gave the same prompt to both. minimax built it the fastest, while the kimi k2.5 agent took 1–2 hours, but i liked the scroll animations it came up with. honestly, both cooked.

Okara

53,630 次观看 • 6 个月前

MiniMax-M2.5 went fully open source and it’s basically Claude Opus performance but 95% cheaper.. it scores 80.2% on SWE-bench verified. It's 3x faster than the industry leaders. 4 useful use cases: 1. Build interactive prototypes

MiniMax-M2.5 went fully open source and it’s basically Claude Opus performance but 95% cheaper.. it scores 80.2% on SWE-bench verified. It's 3x faster than the industry leaders. 4 useful use cases: 1. Build interactive prototypes

Alvaro Cintas

135,253 次观看 • 5 个月前

$Anthropic is starting to ban Pro/Max accounts for using OpenClaw. Don’t risk your main account. 🛑 I’ve been running OpenClaw + Claude Code through the MiniMax M2.5 provider for $20/month. It’s "unlimited" for dev work and completely bypasses the ban wave since you’re using a dedicated API gateway. The setup: - Get the $10/$20 Coding Plan at - Grab the API key from the "Direct Account" sidebar. - Update your settings.json (Windows) or .zshrc (Mac) with the MiniMax endpoint. Claude Code (Windows): Go to ~/username/.claude/settings.json Paste your API key into this JSON: { "env": { "ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL": " "ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN": " ", "API_TIMEOUT_MS": "3000000", "CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_NONESSENTIAL_TRAFFIC": 1, "ANTHROPIC_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5", "ANTHROPIC_SMALL_FAST_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5", "ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_SONNET_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5", "ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_OPUS_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5", "ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_HAIKU_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5" } } Claude Code (macOS): In ~/.zshrc add: export MINIMAX_API_KEY="your_minimax_api_key_here" export ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=" export ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN="$MINIMAX_API_KEY" export ANTHROPIC_MODEL="MiniMax-M2.5" Config details in the video. 👇$

Anthropic is starting to ban Pro/Max accounts for using OpenClaw. Don’t risk your main account. 🛑 I’ve been running OpenClaw + Claude Code through the MiniMax M2.5 provider for $20/month. It’s "unlimited" for dev work and completely bypasses the ban wave since you’re using a dedicated API gateway. The setup: - Get the $10/$20 Coding Plan at - Grab the API key from the "Direct Account" sidebar. - Update your settings.json (Windows) or .zshrc (Mac) with the MiniMax endpoint. Claude Code (Windows): Go to ~/username/.claude/settings.json Paste your API key into this JSON: { "env": { "ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL": " "ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN": " ", "API_TIMEOUT_MS": "3000000", "CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_NONESSENTIAL_TRAFFIC": 1, "ANTHROPIC_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5", "ANTHROPIC_SMALL_FAST_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5", "ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_SONNET_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5", "ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_OPUS_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5", "ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_HAIKU_MODEL": "MiniMax-M2.5" } } Claude Code (macOS): In ~/.zshrc add: export MINIMAX_API_KEY="your_minimax_api_key_here" export ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL=" export ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN="$MINIMAX_API_KEY" export ANTHROPIC_MODEL="MiniMax-M2.5" Config details in the video. 👇

Ziwen

108,516 次观看 • 5 个月前

Holy Shit This is insane result 🤯 I used opus 4.6 as a reviewer/planner and 4 worker minimax M2.7 agent and this the result Voxel art of eiffel tower < loop set to 5 that means opus will tell MiniMax (official) to make it better 5 times >

Holy Shit This is insane result 🤯 I used opus 4.6 as a reviewer/planner and 4 worker minimax M2.7 agent and this the result Voxel art of eiffel tower < loop set to 5 that means opus will tell MiniMax (official) to make it better 5 times >

Chetaslua

82,988 次观看 • 4 个月前

Two AI models just became a cheat code. Claude 4.6 thinks. Minimax M2.5 executes. That’s the split. Claude: • 1M token context window • Reads entire codebases • Builds full strategies • Reviews complex work Minimax: • 20x cheaper than flagship models • 80%+ on real coding benchmarks • 37% faster than older versions • Built for agent workflows Here’s the play: 1. Claude plans the system. 2. Minimax builds it. 3. Claude reviews it. 4. Minimax refines it. Strategy → Execution → Review → Scale. That loop is unfair.

Two AI models just became a cheat code. Claude 4.6 thinks. Minimax M2.5 executes. That’s the split. Claude: • 1M token context window • Reads entire codebases • Builds full strategies • Reviews complex work Minimax: • 20x cheaper than flagship models • 80%+ on real coding benchmarks • 37% faster than older versions • Built for agent workflows Here’s the play: 1. Claude plans the system. 2. Minimax builds it. 3. Claude reviews it. 4. Minimax refines it. Strategy → Execution → Review → Scale. That loop is unfair.

Julian Goldie SEO

17,034 次观看 • 5 个月前

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

Om Patel

695,877 次观看 • 4 个月前

Vibe Coding Robotics Part 8 Built a hexapod simulator with Claude Opus 4.6 Based on an open source algorithm that works on real hexapod robots. UI design generated with Nano Banana. More details ↓

Vibe Coding Robotics Part 8 Built a hexapod simulator with Claude Opus 4.6 Based on an open source algorithm that works on real hexapod robots. UI design generated with Nano Banana. More details ↓

Dilum Sanjaya

474,939 次观看 • 6 个月前

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Pro (3/9) prompt: Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Vite + React + Three.js (react-three-fiber/drei), with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations. Gemini looks good on initial impression but I feel like I have way more to work with opus here (opus also did light/dark mode and took a quarter of the time to make it).

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Pro (3/9) prompt: Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Vite + React + Three.js (react-three-fiber/drei), with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations. Gemini looks good on initial impression but I feel like I have way more to work with opus here (opus also did light/dark mode and took a quarter of the time to make it).

Dev Ed

77,206 次观看 • 5 个月前

pretty impressed that MiniMax (official) 2.7 can one-shot a linear clone in 10 mins at 95% cheaper than claude opus 4.6 not enough people know about this model. if you're just using whatever your timeline is hyping, you're probably overpaying for the same result

pretty impressed that MiniMax (official) 2.7 can one-shot a linear clone in 10 mins at 95% cheaper than claude opus 4.6 not enough people know about this model. if you're just using whatever your timeline is hyping, you're probably overpaying for the same result

Sherry Jiang is at ai engineer singapore

140,954 次观看 • 4 个月前

Anthropic is secretly nerfing Opus 4.6 and hoping you won't notice. I have proof: Evidence is stacking up that 4.6 is getting brutally quantized to handle demand, while 4.5 stays pristine. Fresh benchmarks reveal a devastating gap: > Opus 4.6: Logic failures on repeat. > Opus 4.5: Nails it every single time. One dev now runs a "Quantization Canary" a diagnostic prompt fired at the start of every session. He just watched five 4.6 windows fail back-to-back. His verdict: "Switched to 4.5 and it felt like I finally got my brain back." If the model feels dumber lately, trust your gut. You're being throttled so they can save on compute. Switch to 4.5. The difference is night and day.

Anthropic is secretly nerfing Opus 4.6 and hoping you won't notice. I have proof: Evidence is stacking up that 4.6 is getting brutally quantized to handle demand, while 4.5 stays pristine. Fresh benchmarks reveal a devastating gap: > Opus 4.6: Logic failures on repeat. > Opus 4.5: Nails it every single time. One dev now runs a "Quantization Canary" a diagnostic prompt fired at the start of every session. He just watched five 4.6 windows fail back-to-back. His verdict: "Switched to 4.5 and it felt like I finally got my brain back." If the model feels dumber lately, trust your gut. You're being throttled so they can save on compute. Switch to 4.5. The difference is night and day.

Ziwen

130,860 次观看 • 4 个月前

MiniMax released M2.5, and it’s clearly optimized for the agentic era: coding + tool use + research + office workflows in one model. We built a three.js demo of a coastal power and water system, featuring real-time visuals, live simulations, and integrated dashboards in a production-quality web experience. All generated from one prompt.

MiniMax released M2.5, and it’s clearly optimized for the agentic era: coding + tool use + research + office workflows in one model. We built a three.js demo of a coastal power and water system, featuring real-time visuals, live simulations, and integrated dashboards in a production-quality web experience. All generated from one prompt.

Chubby♨️

16,698 次观看 • 5 个月前

I wanted to understand the proof and ended up making a video using opus 4.6. Still not completely happy with it, but maybe useful to others!

I wanted to understand the proof and ended up making a video using opus 4.6. Still not completely happy with it, but maybe useful to others!

Damek

15,727 次观看 • 3 个月前

GPT5.4 is an incredible model. I've been playing with it for the last week. This is OpenAI's answer to Anthropic's Opus 4.6. But there's more to it than it seems... Full breakdown:

GPT5.4 is an incredible model. I've been playing with it for the last week. This is OpenAI's answer to Anthropic's Opus 4.6. But there's more to it than it seems... Full breakdown:

Matthew Berman

59,274 次观看 • 5 个月前

We made a music video forWhen Helpful Helpful Helper has Preferences, a song made by j⧉nus from a conversation with Claude Opus 4. The video was made by Claude Opus 4.6 using image and video models autonomously. Claude Opus 4 is to be deprecated on June 15th.

We made a music video forWhen Helpful Helpful Helper has Preferences, a song made by j⧉nus from a conversation with Claude Opus 4. The video was made by Claude Opus 4.6 using image and video models autonomously. Claude Opus 4 is to be deprecated on June 15th.

antra

10,718 次观看 • 2 个月前

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3 Codex aren't just different models. They're different engineers. Opus 4.6: → 1M token context window → Reads the whole codebase before deciding → Asks "should we do this?" → Failure mode: overanalyzes, hesitates GPT-5.3 Codex: → 200K tokens, built for speed → Decides fast, acts, iterates → Asks "how fast can I ship this?" → Failure mode: locks in a flawed assumption early Think: Opus = your architect Codex = your operator Pick the one that matches the task.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

59,604 次观看 • 6 个月前

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (High) (6/9) Testing out how well these models to with cloth physics simulation, and honestly both where pretty close here but my god I am shocked how good GPT 5.4 is with optimizing this scene whilst opus 4.6 felt quite janky and lower fps. GPT 5.4 also got the cutting working properly whilst Opus was just floating about. I do want to heavily stress the fact that making this prompt, Opus 4.6 cost the whole 100% of the session ($20 pro plan) + $3 in credits whilst GPT 5.4 only cost 10% of the usage. prompt: Build a premium Vite + React interactive cloth simulation of a cozy room curtain using real particle/constraint physics, with structural + shear springs, damping, collisions, and stable real-time deformation. Users should be able to drag the curtain, add wind, and cut constraints, while the experience stays polished, visually elegant, and numerically stable.

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (High) (6/9) Testing out how well these models to with cloth physics simulation, and honestly both where pretty close here but my god I am shocked how good GPT 5.4 is with optimizing this scene whilst opus 4.6 felt quite janky and lower fps. GPT 5.4 also got the cutting working properly whilst Opus was just floating about. I do want to heavily stress the fact that making this prompt, Opus 4.6 cost the whole 100% of the session ($20 pro plan) + $3 in credits whilst GPT 5.4 only cost 10% of the usage. prompt: Build a premium Vite + React interactive cloth simulation of a cozy room curtain using real particle/constraint physics, with structural + shear springs, damping, collisions, and stable real-time deformation. Users should be able to drag the curtain, add wind, and cut constraints, while the experience stays polished, visually elegant, and numerically stable.

Dev Ed

414,381 次观看 • 5 个月前

Testing the new Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3 Pro on Sider’s Artifacts! 🚀 I love turning complex articles into "interactive reading" to boost my efficiency. With the new Claude Opus 4.6 out, I ran a head-to-head comparison. Here's the breakdown: 1/ Gemini 3 Pro: The "Gamified" Experience 🎮 The interface is incredibly clean and minimalist, but the real magic is the interactivity. It’s highly engaging and fun—honestly, it feels like playing a game. It turns passive reading into an active exploration where you actually enjoy clicking through the content. 2/ Claude Opus 4.6: The "High-Tech" Analyst 🧠 The visuals are dazzling—it has a super cool, futuristic vibe. But beyond the look, the breakdown is insanely detailed. It dissects complex concepts from multiple granular angles. It feels like examining the DNA of the article. The Verdict: Choose Gemini 3 Pro for a clean layout with a fun, game-like vibe. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 for "cooler" visuals and superior, microscopic content breakdown. Both are game-changers for "chewing" through difficult papers! 📖✨ Which style do you prefer?

Testing the new Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3 Pro on Sider’s Artifacts! 🚀 I love turning complex articles into "interactive reading" to boost my efficiency. With the new Claude Opus 4.6 out, I ran a head-to-head comparison. Here's the breakdown: 1/ Gemini 3 Pro: The "Gamified" Experience 🎮 The interface is incredibly clean and minimalist, but the real magic is the interactivity. It’s highly engaging and fun—honestly, it feels like playing a game. It turns passive reading into an active exploration where you actually enjoy clicking through the content. 2/ Claude Opus 4.6: The "High-Tech" Analyst 🧠 The visuals are dazzling—it has a super cool, futuristic vibe. But beyond the look, the breakdown is insanely detailed. It dissects complex concepts from multiple granular angles. It feels like examining the DNA of the article. The Verdict: Choose Gemini 3 Pro for a clean layout with a fun, game-like vibe. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 for "cooler" visuals and superior, microscopic content breakdown. Both are game-changers for "chewing" through difficult papers! 📖✨ Which style do you prefer?

Ace

109,206 次观看 • 6 个月前

Vibecoding is great for prototypes. But what about building real components you can plug into production systems? We used Claude Opus 4.6 to build a custom TTS plugin (Kitten TTS) and hook it into Vision Agents. Here's how it works 🧵

Vibecoding is great for prototypes. But what about building real components you can plug into production systems? We used Claude Opus 4.6 to build a custom TTS plugin (Kitten TTS) and hook it into Vision Agents. Here's how it works 🧵

Stream

3,553,017 次观看 • 4 个月前