Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3 Pro (3/9) prompt: Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Vite + React + Three.js (react-three-fiber/drei), with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations. Gemini looks good on initial impression but I feel like I have way... show more

Dev Ed

71,245 subscribers

77,206 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

MiniMax M2.7 is too good for it price🤯 Prompt : Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Three.js in one html code block, with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations and you can do 2 things of your choice to make it better

MiniMax M2.7 is too good for it price🤯 Prompt : Build a premium interactive isometric 3D cozy room using Three.js in one html code block, with all objects modeled in code (no external assets) and subtle ambient animations and you can do 2 things of your choice to make it better

Chetaslua

26,520 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini Pro 3.1 (7/9) I wanted to do a physics simulation test, overall both models did a good job in this department, however Opus added nice animations to things like "Fan", "Magnet" whilst gemini just rendered them out as a red circle. Opus also included way more effects in its toolbox, like rocket, connecting shapes with rope, springs etc. Should note that in all of these tests, Opus one shotted all of them, whilst gemini took an extra 3-5 prompts to get the project compile :) prompt: Build a polished physics sandbox toy using React + Vite with a real physics engine (Matter.js or Rapier), where users can spawn, grab, throw, and connect objects with springs, hinges, and ropes, plus interactive gadgets like fans and thrusters.

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini Pro 3.1 (7/9) I wanted to do a physics simulation test, overall both models did a good job in this department, however Opus added nice animations to things like "Fan", "Magnet" whilst gemini just rendered them out as a red circle. Opus also included way more effects in its toolbox, like rocket, connecting shapes with rope, springs etc. Should note that in all of these tests, Opus one shotted all of them, whilst gemini took an extra 3-5 prompts to get the project compile :) prompt: Build a polished physics sandbox toy using React + Vite with a real physics engine (Matter.js or Rapier), where users can spawn, grab, throw, and connect objects with springs, hinges, and ropes, plus interactive gadgets like fans and thrusters.

Dev Ed

28,179 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (2/9) prompt: Build a premium Vite + React landing page for Aether, an AI creative studio, with dark-mode design, high-end animations (Framer Motion), and conversion-focused sections (hero, features, demo, pricing, testimonials). Whilst I think gemini is overall better at design, the model often struggles with syntax issues, tool calling and thinking for 2-3 times the amount of opus.

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro (2/9) prompt: Build a premium Vite + React landing page for Aether, an AI creative studio, with dark-mode design, high-end animations (Framer Motion), and conversion-focused sections (hero, features, demo, pricing, testimonials). Whilst I think gemini is overall better at design, the model often struggles with syntax issues, tool calling and thinking for 2-3 times the amount of opus.

Dev Ed

62,391 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini Pro 3.1 (5/9) Opus absolutely COOKS gemini, by creating an overall better cohesive design, extra features like like dark mode, poper tabs for stock analysis, news, and it even created it's own svgs for the stock tickers whilst doing it FASTER than gemini. Opus: 12 mins 23 seconds Gemini: 18 mins 31 seconds (had to reprompt it 3 extra times to fix syntax errors) prompt: Build a high-end stock analysis dashboard using React + Vite + TypeScript, with a polished TradingView/Bloomberg-style UI, left sidebar of stock tickers, smooth transitions, and premium charts (candlesticks, indicators, comparisons). Use local dummy JSON data only (prices, financials, future points) with a time-simulation mode, rich stock detail tabs (overview, financials, valuation, technicals), and add 3–5 pro features like watchlists, compare mode, alerts, portfolio sandbox, or earnings calendar—architected so a real API can be swapped in later.

Opus 4.6 vs Gemini Pro 3.1 (5/9) Opus absolutely COOKS gemini, by creating an overall better cohesive design, extra features like like dark mode, poper tabs for stock analysis, news, and it even created it's own svgs for the stock tickers whilst doing it FASTER than gemini. Opus: 12 mins 23 seconds Gemini: 18 mins 31 seconds (had to reprompt it 3 extra times to fix syntax errors) prompt: Build a high-end stock analysis dashboard using React + Vite + TypeScript, with a polished TradingView/Bloomberg-style UI, left sidebar of stock tickers, smooth transitions, and premium charts (candlesticks, indicators, comparisons). Use local dummy JSON data only (prices, financials, future points) with a time-simulation mode, rich stock detail tabs (overview, financials, valuation, technicals), and add 3–5 pro features like watchlists, compare mode, alerts, portfolio sandbox, or earnings calendar—architected so a real API can be swapped in later.

Dev Ed

286,694 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (High) (6/9) Testing out how well these models to with cloth physics simulation, and honestly both where pretty close here but my god I am shocked how good GPT 5.4 is with optimizing this scene whilst opus 4.6 felt quite janky and lower fps. GPT 5.4 also got the cutting working properly whilst Opus was just floating about. I do want to heavily stress the fact that making this prompt, Opus 4.6 cost the whole 100% of the session ($20 pro plan) + $3 in credits whilst GPT 5.4 only cost 10% of the usage. prompt: Build a premium Vite + React interactive cloth simulation of a cozy room curtain using real particle/constraint physics, with structural + shear springs, damping, collisions, and stable real-time deformation. Users should be able to drag the curtain, add wind, and cut constraints, while the experience stays polished, visually elegant, and numerically stable.

Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.4 (High) (6/9) Testing out how well these models to with cloth physics simulation, and honestly both where pretty close here but my god I am shocked how good GPT 5.4 is with optimizing this scene whilst opus 4.6 felt quite janky and lower fps. GPT 5.4 also got the cutting working properly whilst Opus was just floating about. I do want to heavily stress the fact that making this prompt, Opus 4.6 cost the whole 100% of the session ($20 pro plan) + $3 in credits whilst GPT 5.4 only cost 10% of the usage. prompt: Build a premium Vite + React interactive cloth simulation of a cozy room curtain using real particle/constraint physics, with structural + shear springs, damping, collisions, and stable real-time deformation. Users should be able to drag the curtain, add wind, and cut constraints, while the experience stays polished, visually elegant, and numerically stable.

Dev Ed

414,134 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

Om Patel

695,562 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Testing the new Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3 Pro on Sider’s Artifacts! 🚀 I love turning complex articles into "interactive reading" to boost my efficiency. With the new Claude Opus 4.6 out, I ran a head-to-head comparison. Here's the breakdown: 1/ Gemini 3 Pro: The "Gamified" Experience 🎮 The interface is incredibly clean and minimalist, but the real magic is the interactivity. It’s highly engaging and fun—honestly, it feels like playing a game. It turns passive reading into an active exploration where you actually enjoy clicking through the content. 2/ Claude Opus 4.6: The "High-Tech" Analyst 🧠 The visuals are dazzling—it has a super cool, futuristic vibe. But beyond the look, the breakdown is insanely detailed. It dissects complex concepts from multiple granular angles. It feels like examining the DNA of the article. The Verdict: Choose Gemini 3 Pro for a clean layout with a fun, game-like vibe. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 for "cooler" visuals and superior, microscopic content breakdown. Both are game-changers for "chewing" through difficult papers! 📖✨ Which style do you prefer?

Testing the new Claude Opus 4.6 vs. Gemini 3 Pro on Sider’s Artifacts! 🚀 I love turning complex articles into "interactive reading" to boost my efficiency. With the new Claude Opus 4.6 out, I ran a head-to-head comparison. Here's the breakdown: 1/ Gemini 3 Pro: The "Gamified" Experience 🎮 The interface is incredibly clean and minimalist, but the real magic is the interactivity. It’s highly engaging and fun—honestly, it feels like playing a game. It turns passive reading into an active exploration where you actually enjoy clicking through the content. 2/ Claude Opus 4.6: The "High-Tech" Analyst 🧠 The visuals are dazzling—it has a super cool, futuristic vibe. But beyond the look, the breakdown is insanely detailed. It dissects complex concepts from multiple granular angles. It feels like examining the DNA of the article. The Verdict: Choose Gemini 3 Pro for a clean layout with a fun, game-like vibe. Choose Claude Opus 4.6 for "cooler" visuals and superior, microscopic content breakdown. Both are game-changers for "chewing" through difficult papers! 📖✨ Which style do you prefer?

Ace

109,206 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 CANCEL YOUR SaaS Subscriptions - Build With AI Use top models including - Opus 4.7 & Sonnet 4.6 - GPT 5.5 high - Gemini 3.1 Pro Build entire apps, backends, APIs and mobile apps all using ENGLISH - The agent also has a built in Q/A engineer BUILD END TO END APPS WITH AI

🚨 CANCEL YOUR SaaS Subscriptions - Build With AI Use top models including - Opus 4.7 & Sonnet 4.6 - GPT 5.5 high - Gemini 3.1 Pro Build entire apps, backends, APIs and mobile apps all using ENGLISH - The agent also has a built in Q/A engineer BUILD END TO END APPS WITH AI

Abacus.AI

3,299,141 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

Clawdbot creator Peter Steinberger 🦞 says Claude Opus is his favorite model, but OpenAI Codex is the best for coding: "OpenAI is very reliable. For coding, I prefer Codex because it can navigate large codebases. You can prompt and have 95% certainty that it actually works. With Claude Code you need more tricks to get the same." "But character wise, [Opus] behaves so good in a Discord it kind of feels like a human. I've only really experienced that with Opus."

TBPN

442,659 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

I tried Opus 4.6 Max in Cursor with a much more detailed prompt and the results are incredible Functional inventory, health, tools, recipes, and more The only downside is how expensive the model is and it also had to fix some bugs, but it's a pretty strong model overall

I tried Opus 4.6 Max in Cursor with a much more detailed prompt and the results are incredible Functional inventory, health, tools, recipes, and more The only downside is how expensive the model is and it also had to fix some bugs, but it's a pretty strong model overall

Angel 🌼

70,710 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

For developers, Gemini 3 Pro offers unparalleled results across every major AI benchmark compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro. Here three ways Gemini 3 Pro can improve your workflow today: 1. Gemini 3 Pro fits right into existing production agent and coding workflows. It is also integrated into development environment experiences across the ecosystem of developer products like Google AI Studio, Gemini CLI, and Android Studio. 2. We introduced Google Google Antigravity, a new agentic development platform that reimagines how the model and IDE work together. It enables developers to manage agents to work at a higher, task-oriented level collaborating with agents while they build. 3. We’ve built Google AI Studio to be your fastest path from a prompt to an AI-native app. Build mode lets you add AI capabilities faster than ever, automatically wiring up the right models and APIs, while features like annotations enable fast and intuitive iteration. Whether you’re building a one-shot prompt game or an interactive landing page from unstructured voice notes, you can bring any idea to life with Gemini 3.

For developers, Gemini 3 Pro offers unparalleled results across every major AI benchmark compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro. Here three ways Gemini 3 Pro can improve your workflow today: 1. Gemini 3 Pro fits right into existing production agent and coding workflows. It is also integrated into development environment experiences across the ecosystem of developer products like Google AI Studio, Gemini CLI, and Android Studio. 2. We introduced Google Google Antigravity, a new agentic development platform that reimagines how the model and IDE work together. It enables developers to manage agents to work at a higher, task-oriented level collaborating with agents while they build. 3. We’ve built Google AI Studio to be your fastest path from a prompt to an AI-native app. Build mode lets you add AI capabilities faster than ever, automatically wiring up the right models and APIs, while features like annotations enable fast and intuitive iteration. Whether you’re building a one-shot prompt game or an interactive landing page from unstructured voice notes, you can bring any idea to life with Gemini 3.

Google AI

136,589 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Over the weekend, I added multiplayer "paint ball" dogfight to Tiny Skies, so players can fly around pelting each other with colourful paint balls, just for fun. I tried meshy and tripo to generate some 3D models for the game and the mesh vertices count are really high and lags the game a lot (probably because my game is a globe with thousands of objects - albeit mostly instanced). To my surprise, I found Gemini 3.1 Pro to be really quite good at generating good looking 3D models that are low in poly count. It generated 3D models at a much higher quality than Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4. You can see the upgraded biplane models and some objects in the video below. #vibejam

Over the weekend, I added multiplayer "paint ball" dogfight to Tiny Skies, so players can fly around pelting each other with colourful paint balls, just for fun. I tried meshy and tripo to generate some 3D models for the game and the mesh vertices count are really high and lags the game a lot (probably because my game is a globe with thousands of objects - albeit mostly instanced). To my surprise, I found Gemini 3.1 Pro to be really quite good at generating good looking 3D models that are low in poly count. It generated 3D models at a much higher quality than Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4. You can see the upgraded biplane models and some objects in the video below. #vibejam

Danny Limanseta

36,091 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

$I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)$

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)

Ian Nuttall

194,949 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Really proud of what I was able to achieve developing 3D cell nuclei with custom geometry shaders using Three.js for a cancer care platform, all built with Google Gemini 3 Pro AI 💜 Had to approach the project twice, but had a lot of fun doing it :) Live:

Really proud of what I was able to achieve developing 3D cell nuclei with custom geometry shaders using Three.js for a cancer care platform, all built with Google Gemini 3 Pro AI 💜 Had to approach the project twice, but had a lot of fun doing it :) Live:

The Bugged Dev

19,420 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨Gemini 3.0 Pro - One shotted i asked it for retro nintendo sims with games and no external assets used , it takes 1 min to output no other model have this level of consistency Prompt and Proof of one shot in Thread and this is not the best shot , there is one more cooking with slightly different prompt

🚨Gemini 3.0 Pro - One shotted i asked it for retro nintendo sims with games and no external assets used , it takes 1 min to output no other model have this level of consistency Prompt and Proof of one shot in Thread and this is not the best shot , there is one more cooking with slightly different prompt

Chetaslua

184,195 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

I built a bot on an ESP32 that can create full projects by itself. Ask it to generate images, videos, 3D, build a website and publish it, it does everything autonomously. Powered by Claude Opus 4.6 for code, visual content generated with fal, bot powered via OpenClaw🦞 The skills to generate project with fal are here All running on a tiny M5Stack Core2.

I built a bot on an ESP32 that can create full projects by itself. Ask it to generate images, videos, 3D, build a website and publish it, it does everything autonomously. Powered by Claude Opus 4.6 for code, visual content generated with fal, bot powered via OpenClaw🦞 The skills to generate project with fal are here All running on a tiny M5Stack Core2.

Lovis Odin

50,371 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Block blast makes ~$1M/day from ads I play it everyday and my biggest gripe is there's no way to skip them So I vibe coded my own version - here's how: > Write prompt with gpt-5 > Build using opus 4.5 on rork > Done entirely on my phone I used to code games from scratch and it took months, now all it takes is a $25/month app and the quality feels unreal With 0.1% of block blast's market, you’ll have a $30k/month app If you’re waiting to start building - this is your sign

Block blast makes ~$1M/day from ads I play it everyday and my biggest gripe is there's no way to skip them So I vibe coded my own version - here's how: > Write prompt with gpt-5 > Build using opus 4.5 on rork > Done entirely on my phone I used to code games from scratch and it took months, now all it takes is a $25/month app and the quality feels unreal With 0.1% of block blast's market, you’ll have a $30k/month app If you’re waiting to start building - this is your sign

Avery

271,278 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Claude Code is unusable. So I built my own. Introducing BridgeCode. Launching next Wednesday. Everything you love about Claude Code. No rate limits. No 529 errors. No 500 errors. No nerfing. Connect to any provider. Claude Opus 4.6. GPT 5.4. Gemini 3.1 Pro. GLM 5.1. All of them. Switch models in seconds. And one more thing. Swarm mode. One prompt. Ten agents. Working together to ship your code. Claude Code rate limited me into building a competitor. Thank you, Anthropic. Launching next Wednesday.

Claude Code is unusable. So I built my own. Introducing BridgeCode. Launching next Wednesday. Everything you love about Claude Code. No rate limits. No 529 errors. No 500 errors. No nerfing. Connect to any provider. Claude Opus 4.6. GPT 5.4. Gemini 3.1 Pro. GLM 5.1. All of them. Switch models in seconds. And one more thing. Swarm mode. One prompt. Ten agents. Working together to ship your code. Claude Code rate limited me into building a competitor. Thank you, Anthropic. Launching next Wednesday.

BridgeMind

47,103 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

claude opus 4.5 is finally here, so we tested it against gemini 3 to see which one is the better at vibe coding we took a new startup idea and went from idea to landing page to prototype to ad creative in one sitting. you also see how The Boring Marketer uses claude skills to get the most out of claude opus 4.5 (and how you can do the same). if you’re wondering whether opus 4.5 is worth using, this 1hr tutorial will help you decide and learn how to get the most from it.

claude opus 4.5 is finally here, so we tested it against gemini 3 to see which one is the better at vibe coding we took a new startup idea and went from idea to landing page to prototype to ad creative in one sitting. you also see how The Boring Marketer uses claude skills to get the most out of claude opus 4.5 (and how you can do the same). if you’re wondering whether opus 4.5 is worth using, this 1hr tutorial will help you decide and learn how to get the most from it.

GREG ISENBERG

84,982 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚀 I'm launching r3f-webgpu-perf today! "npm i r3f-webgpu-perf" One thing I missed while working with WebGPU in React Three Fiber was a performance monitor similar to r3f-perf. The existing tool is fantastic, but it doesn’t support the WebGPU renderer yet. So I decided to build one. ✅ Supports both WebGL and WebGPU ✅ Modern and customizable UI ✅ Lightweight and easy to integrate ✅ Built specifically for React Three Fiber My goal is to turn r3f-webgpu-perf into more than just a metrics dashboard. I want it to become a learning tool that provides real-time optimization suggestions based on the techniques I’ve developed while building hundreds of interactive 3D projects over the last two decades. A vanilla Three.js version is also planned. If you’re building with Three.js, React Three Fiber, or WebGPU, I’d love for you to try it and share your feedback. ⭐ GitHub: 📦 NPM: Every GitHub star helps make the tool better for the entire community. #threejs #creativecoding #webgpu #r3f

🚀 I'm launching r3f-webgpu-perf today! "npm i r3f-webgpu-perf" One thing I missed while working with WebGPU in React Three Fiber was a performance monitor similar to r3f-perf. The existing tool is fantastic, but it doesn’t support the WebGPU renderer yet. So I decided to build one. ✅ Supports both WebGL and WebGPU ✅ Modern and customizable UI ✅ Lightweight and easy to integrate ✅ Built specifically for React Three Fiber My goal is to turn r3f-webgpu-perf into more than just a metrics dashboard. I want it to become a learning tool that provides real-time optimization suggestions based on the techniques I’ve developed while building hundreds of interactive 3D projects over the last two decades. A vanilla Three.js version is also planned. If you’re building with Three.js, React Three Fiber, or WebGPU, I’d love for you to try it and share your feedback. ⭐ GitHub: 📦 NPM: Every GitHub star helps make the tool better for the entire community. #threejs #creativecoding #webgpu #r3f

Anderson Mancini

23,332 просмотров • 1 месяц назад