Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

RoundtableSpace's profile picture

0xMarioNawfal

266,222 subscribers

55,164 просмотров • 6 часов назад •via X (Twitter)

ОбразованиеИгрыНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 2

Фото профиля vøv △
vøv △6 часов назад

v4.1 flash speed for local agenting wins

Фото профиля Yaro 🔜 TOKEN2049 🇸🇬
Yaro 🔜 TOKEN2049 🇸🇬6 часов назад

AI benchmarks are basically esports now.

Похожие видео

Qwen 3.8 vs GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Prompt: Build an Angry Birds clone Qwen 3.8 took $0.49 in 3 min GLM 5.3 took $0.46 in 2 min Gemini 3.8 Flash took $0.29 in 2 min 23 sec DeepSeek v4.1 Flash took $0.11 in 1 min 28 sec Which one wins for you?
0:24

Qwen 3.8 vs GLM 5.3 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash Prompt: Build an Angry Birds clone Qwen 3.8 took $0.49 in 3 min GLM 5.3 took $0.46 in 2 min Gemini 3.8 Flash took $0.29 in 2 min 23 sec DeepSeek v4.1 Flash took $0.11 in 1 min 28 sec Which one wins for you?

Bhavy☄️

27,799 просмотров • 27 дней назад

Five frontier models. One simple prompt. No retries. No blender. Just a simple frontend web design. Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs. GLM 5.3 Flash vs. Qwen3.8 Flash Next Which model built the best looking luxury watch landing page? IMO Fable 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash look the best. LIVE DEMO:
0:43

Five frontier models. One simple prompt. No retries. No blender. Just a simple frontend web design. Fable 5.1 vs. GPT-6 Astra vs. DeepSeek v4.1 Flash vs. GLM 5.3 Flash vs. Qwen3.8 Flash Next Which model built the best looking luxury watch landing page? IMO Fable 5.1 and GLM 5.3 Flash look the best. LIVE DEMO:

Mia

16,501 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Gemini-3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra I tried to recreate 3D website that pulls apart male anatomy using Gemini 3.8 Flash it took 1 minute 52 seconds to build at zero cost here's the result 💀
0:28

Gemini-3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra I tried to recreate 3D website that pulls apart male anatomy using Gemini 3.8 Flash it took 1 minute 52 seconds to build at zero cost here's the result 💀

Tim Jayas

419,951 просмотров • 28 дней назад

GPT-6 Astra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in Three.js. Same kind of task, two completely different approaches. The visual difference alone is pretty interesting. Source footage and original material: OpenDesign
0:24

GPT-6 Astra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in Three.js. Same kind of task, two completely different approaches. The visual difference alone is pretty interesting. Source footage and original material: OpenDesign

Token Gremlin

44,946 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Opus 5.5 vs GPT Astra 6 "Make me a bluetooth speaker with tscircuit"
0:38

Opus 5.5 vs GPT Astra 6 "Make me a bluetooth speaker with tscircuit"

Seve

321,973 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Astra 6 Which one did better at Spider Man Game
0:32

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Fable 5.1 vs GPT-Astra 6 Which one did better at Spider Man Game

K2S

242,127 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Opus 5.5 vs 6 Astra
0:41

Opus 5.5 vs 6 Astra

0xMarioNawfal

46,003 просмотров • 7 дней назад

DEEPSEEK V4.1 FLASH IS CLAIMED TO HIT 98% OF GPT-6 ASTRA AND IT’S FREE ON XPLABS
0:29

DEEPSEEK V4.1 FLASH IS CLAIMED TO HIT 98% OF GPT-6 ASTRA AND IT’S FREE ON XPLABS

0xMarioNawfal

42,767 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. Samurai game demos made with Higgsfield.
0:27

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. Samurai game demos made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

1,113,753 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra
0:40

Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra

0xMarioNawfal

54,948 просмотров • 29 дней назад

Which flash model wins? DeepSeek v4.1 flash, Qwen 3.8 flash, or GLM 5.3 flash 🤯
0:41

Which flash model wins? DeepSeek v4.1 flash, Qwen 3.8 flash, or GLM 5.3 flash 🤯

GMI Cloud

15,052 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Opus 5 same prompt to each model and i wasn't expecting gemini 3.8 flash to be this fast! build time: > Opus 5: 24 minutes > 3.8 Flash: 37 seconds 💀 if gemini is given same time as opus 5 it will mog the hell out of opus in terms of quality too which one would you choose here?
0:35

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Opus 5 same prompt to each model and i wasn't expecting gemini 3.8 flash to be this fast! build time: > Opus 5: 24 minutes > 3.8 Flash: 37 seconds 💀 if gemini is given same time as opus 5 it will mog the hell out of opus in terms of quality too which one would you choose here?

Tim Jayas

76,990 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

deepseek v4.1 flash ran all four three.js scenes for $0.15. gemini 3.8 flash needed $1.25 we put the two models on one job: a self-contained html page that renders an animated 3d scene with three.js – a storm at sea, a spiral galaxy, a tornado over farmland, a tesla coil on a dark table. same prompt - calls until all four scenes were usable #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 6 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 12 - time #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 13m 57s #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 32m 02s - cost #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.15 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – $1.25 observations: • gemini blew out the exposure on 4 of 5 first attempts – a white blob where the tesla coil should be. the prompt had a paragraph on exposure. it did not help. • both models overcorrect in the fix loop: "too bright" becomes "almost black". round two is where it lands. same four scenes, 6 calls and $0.15 against 12 calls and $1.25!
0:28

deepseek v4.1 flash ran all four three.js scenes for $0.15. gemini 3.8 flash needed $1.25 we put the two models on one job: a self-contained html page that renders an animated 3d scene with three.js – a storm at sea, a spiral galaxy, a tornado over farmland, a tesla coil on a dark table. same prompt - calls until all four scenes were usable #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 6 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 12 - time #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – 13m 57s #2 gemini 3.8 flash – 32m 02s - cost #1 deepseek v4.1 flash – $0.15 #2 gemini 3.8 flash – $1.25 observations: • gemini blew out the exposure on 4 of 5 first attempts – a white blob where the tesla coil should be. the prompt had a paragraph on exposure. it did not help. • both models overcorrect in the fix loop: "too bright" becomes "almost black". round two is where it lands. same four scenes, 6 calls and $0.15 against 12 calls and $1.25!

thehype.

62,603 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra, cost comparison. We paired both of these with Tesseract to recreate our launch video.
0:32

Opus 5.5 vs. GPT-6 Astra, cost comparison. We paired both of these with Tesseract to recreate our launch video.

Mirage

206,781 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6 xHigh vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3 Guys… the gap is actually ridiculous 😭 Opus 5 is in a completely different world here. Especially compared to Gemini 3.6 Flash — it’s not even remotely close.
0:28

Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6 xHigh vs Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Kimi K3 Guys… the gap is actually ridiculous 😭 Opus 5 is in a completely different world here. Especially compared to Gemini 3.6 Flash — it’s not even remotely close.

OmedTheVibeCoder

12,823 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS × Opus 5.5で動画作るの熱そう！
1:40

Gemini 3.8 Flash TTS × Opus 5.5で動画作るの熱そう！

KEITO💻AIディレクター

1,226,161 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Opus 5 vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash tested both models with same frontend prompt at highest reasoning available but results came out really different > opus took 80 minutes to complete and costed $20 > v4.1 flash took 60 minutes and costed $0.2 which one did better here?
0:25

Opus 5 vs DeepSeek v4.1 Flash tested both models with same frontend prompt at highest reasoning available but results came out really different > opus took 80 minutes to complete and costed $20 > v4.1 flash took 60 minutes and costed $0.2 which one did better here?

J A Z I I

39,045 просмотров • 25 дней назад

how did DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash became so good both the outputs are from same prompts.. DeepSeek's flash model on max effort smokes Opus 5 on medium effort and the crazy part is it's still 90% cheaper best strategy would be to use Opus for planning and deepseek-v4.1-flash for execution, that would be an insane combo but do you think Gemini 4 Pro could outperform DeepSeek-v4.1-flash?
0:50

how did DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash became so good both the outputs are from same prompts.. DeepSeek's flash model on max effort smokes Opus 5 on medium effort and the crazy part is it's still 90% cheaper best strategy would be to use Opus for planning and deepseek-v4.1-flash for execution, that would be an insane combo but do you think Gemini 4 Pro could outperform DeepSeek-v4.1-flash?

Tim Jayas

11,371 просмотров • 18 дней назад

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Opus 5. Only 7 days separated their releases. While Opus 5 accomplished in 1 shot what took DS 3, DeepSeek V4 Flash did it in ~900 lines vs ~3000 lines for Opus. Cost delta is stark. DeepSeek cost 1 cent. DS V4 Flash 0731 is new baseline for value-perf
0:20

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Opus 5. Only 7 days separated their releases. While Opus 5 accomplished in 1 shot what took DS 3, DeepSeek V4 Flash did it in ~900 lines vs ~3000 lines for Opus. Cost delta is stark. DeepSeek cost 1 cent. DS V4 Flash 0731 is new baseline for value-perf

David Hendrickson

43,797 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash just one shot Minecraft. It built this in 11 minutes and cost less than $0.25. Muse Spark 1.3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash completely failed on this same exact prompt. DeepSeek cooked.
0:58

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash just one shot Minecraft. It built this in 11 minutes and cost less than $0.25. Muse Spark 1.3 and Gemini 3.8 Flash completely failed on this same exact prompt. DeepSeek cooked.

BridgeMind

47,564 просмотров • 25 дней назад