正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Ossoff: I think we have to step back and recognize that this entire war is based on lies. They told us last year that the Iranian nuclear threat was obliterated. Then they told us earlier this year that there was an imminent nuclear threat. On day four of this... show more

Acyn

769,190 subscribers

24,727 次观看 • 5 小时前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Jon Ossoff: “There’s something uniquely despicable about lying a nation into war. Treating citizens as fools and the selfless patriots who serve as pawns. Earlier this year, they claimed there was an imminent nuclear threat after last year they told us they had obliterated that threat. Both times lies. On day 12 of this war, the president said we won. On day 14, Secretary Hegseth said Iran’s military was destroyed. Five months later, we’re still bombing, Americans are still dying, Iran still has its uranium, the Strait of Hormuz is still closed. I challenge anyone to defend this. A war built on lies told by a White House that is utterly absent any figures of integrity to dissuade this president from his delusions”

Jon Ossoff: “There’s something uniquely despicable about lying a nation into war. Treating citizens as fools and the selfless patriots who serve as pawns. Earlier this year, they claimed there was an imminent nuclear threat after last year they told us they had obliterated that threat. Both times lies. On day 12 of this war, the president said we won. On day 14, Secretary Hegseth said Iran’s military was destroyed. Five months later, we’re still bombing, Americans are still dying, Iran still has its uranium, the Strait of Hormuz is still closed. I challenge anyone to defend this. A war built on lies told by a White House that is utterly absent any figures of integrity to dissuade this president from his delusions”

Marco Foster

548,228 次观看 • 3 天前

OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct? GABBARD: That's right OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC assess that there was an imminent nuclear threat? GABBARD: The only person who can determine what is or is not an imminent threat is the president OSSOFF: False

OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct? GABBARD: That's right OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC assess that there was an imminent nuclear threat? GABBARD: The only person who can determine what is or is not an imminent threat is the president OSSOFF: False

Aaron Rupar

789,439 次观看 • 4 个月前

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Rand Paul: "Really, the debate now should be, is a 47 year old conflict an imminent threat? Were there changes in their nuclear program that made this an imminent threat? And I don't think the evidence is there that this was an imminent threat that would allow the president to go to war on his own."

Aaron Rupar

228,697 次观看 • 4 个月前

Tulsi Gabbard: 🚨 The Intelligence Community did not assess an imminent nuclear threat from Iran following last Summer’s airstrike Ossoffd: The IC determined that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program enrichment program was obliterated by last summers airstrike. Correct? Gabbard: Yes… Ossoff: Last night, you stated there’s been no effort since then to rebuild their enrichment capability, correct? Gabbard: That’s right.. Ossoff: The WH says this new war was launched to eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by Iran. —— “Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: The IC determined that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and grow their nuclear enrichment capabilities. ——The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: False…

Tulsi Gabbard: 🚨 The Intelligence Community did not assess an imminent nuclear threat from Iran following last Summer’s airstrike Ossoffd: The IC determined that Iran’s nuclear enrichment program enrichment program was obliterated by last summers airstrike. Correct? Gabbard: Yes… Ossoff: Last night, you stated there’s been no effort since then to rebuild their enrichment capability, correct? Gabbard: That’s right.. Ossoff: The WH says this new war was launched to eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by Iran. —— “Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: The IC determined that Iran maintained the intention to rebuild and grow their nuclear enrichment capabilities. ——The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: False…

MJTruthUltra

440,571 次观看 • 4 个月前

OSSOFF: You stated we had “achieved every single objective” Was that an accurate statement four months ago? HEGSETH: The main objective of this was to ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon. Their main sites were obliterated.

OSSOFF: You stated we had “achieved every single objective” Was that an accurate statement four months ago? HEGSETH: The main objective of this was to ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon. Their main sites were obliterated.

Acyn

88,773 次观看 • 22 天前

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth: President Trump said, "We're not fighting stupid wars like that again." And he hasn't. YES WE HAVE. We were told they started this war to END the Nuclear Program that they said they OBLITERATED on June 25th, 2025. END WAR NOW

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth: President Trump said, "We're not fighting stupid wars like that again." And he hasn't. YES WE HAVE. We were told they started this war to END the Nuclear Program that they said they OBLITERATED on June 25th, 2025. END WAR NOW

Ryan Rozbiani

10,201 次观看 • 22 天前

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) questioned Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on the bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities. Smith: “We had to start this war you just said 60 days ago because the nuclear weapon was an imminent threat. Now you're saying that it was completely obliterated?” Hegseth: “They had not given up their nuclear ambitions.”

Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) questioned Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on the bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities. Smith: “We had to start this war you just said 60 days ago because the nuclear weapon was an imminent threat. Now you're saying that it was completely obliterated?” Hegseth: “They had not given up their nuclear ambitions.”

CBS News

53,996 次观看 • 3 个月前

Thomas Massie says the Trump administration “can’t give us a straight answer as to why we launched this war.” “They told us this war was about nuclear weapons but six months ago we were assured our last strike on Iran decimated their nuclear program. So which is it?”

Thomas Massie says the Trump administration “can’t give us a straight answer as to why we launched this war.” “They told us this war was about nuclear weapons but six months ago we were assured our last strike on Iran decimated their nuclear program. So which is it?”

The American Conservative

53,146 次观看 • 5 个月前

Ossoff: We've got Americans coming back from overseas in flag-draped coffins. In the last two weeks, nearly 100 wounded in action, at least four killed in action, in a war that they lied us into. They told us there was an imminent nuclear threat, a year after they told us they'd obliterated the threat. They told us in the second week they'd already destroyed the enemy. They told us over and over and over again that they'd won. That they were about to win…They keep telling us it's going to last just a couple more days, just a couple more weeks. And all of this incompetence is costing lives, and it's costing families across the country economically who are dealing with these out-of-control tariffs, who are dealing with gas prices.

Ossoff: We've got Americans coming back from overseas in flag-draped coffins. In the last two weeks, nearly 100 wounded in action, at least four killed in action, in a war that they lied us into. They told us there was an imminent nuclear threat, a year after they told us they'd obliterated the threat. They told us in the second week they'd already destroyed the enemy. They told us over and over and over again that they'd won. That they were about to win…They keep telling us it's going to last just a couple more days, just a couple more weeks. And all of this incompetence is costing lives, and it's costing families across the country economically who are dealing with these out-of-control tariffs, who are dealing with gas prices.

Team Ossoff

88,525 次观看 • 18 天前

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak stated that Netanyahu is lying about achieving the goals of the war with Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran, and doesn't know how to end the hostilities. "Israel, at the political level, doesn't know - either doesn't know or doesn't want to - put an end to the war. They don't know how to end wars. We have been in this situation for two and a half years; Hamas is still there, despite the fact that they promised us six times that we were on the verge of 'complete victory'. Hezbollah is still there, despite the fact that they told us we had pushed them back decades. And the Iranian nuclear program and missiles are still there, despite the fact that they assured us that he [Netanyahu] had eliminated the existential threat."

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak stated that Netanyahu is lying about achieving the goals of the war with Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran, and doesn't know how to end the hostilities. "Israel, at the political level, doesn't know - either doesn't know or doesn't want to - put an end to the war. They don't know how to end wars. We have been in this situation for two and a half years; Hamas is still there, despite the fact that they promised us six times that we were on the verge of 'complete victory'. Hezbollah is still there, despite the fact that they told us we had pushed them back decades. And the Iranian nuclear program and missiles are still there, despite the fact that they assured us that he [Netanyahu] had eliminated the existential threat."

Sprinter Press

13,930 次观看 • 4 个月前

US Senator: "American soldiers are returning from the war with Iran in coffins." John Asaaf: "Some Americans are returning from overseas in coffins, draped with flags. In the past two weeks, nearly 100 people have been injured in the war with Iran, and at least four have died in a war that we were drawn into through lies. Last year, we were told that the nuclear threat had been eliminated. Then, in the second week, we were told that the enemy had been destroyed. Again and again, we were told that we had won, that we were on the verge of victory... We are constantly told that this will only last a few days, a few weeks. But all this incompetence is costing lives, and it is also taking a heavy economic toll on families across the country who are struggling with uncontrolled tariffs and gasoline prices."

US Senator: "American soldiers are returning from the war with Iran in coffins." John Asaaf: "Some Americans are returning from overseas in coffins, draped with flags. In the past two weeks, nearly 100 people have been injured in the war with Iran, and at least four have died in a war that we were drawn into through lies. Last year, we were told that the nuclear threat had been eliminated. Then, in the second week, we were told that the enemy had been destroyed. Again and again, we were told that we had won, that we were on the verge of victory... We are constantly told that this will only last a few days, a few weeks. But all this incompetence is costing lives, and it is also taking a heavy economic toll on families across the country who are struggling with uncontrolled tariffs and gasoline prices."

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

24,709 次观看 • 17 天前

Magaziner: The administration has not given us any evidence—I've gone to every briefing, classified briefings and otherwise—that Iran was plotting an imminent threat against the United States, an imminent attack, any evidence that they were close to getting a nuclear weapon? None. This is an unnecessary war

Magaziner: The administration has not given us any evidence—I've gone to every briefing, classified briefings and otherwise—that Iran was plotting an imminent threat against the United States, an imminent attack, any evidence that they were close to getting a nuclear weapon? None. This is an unnecessary war

Acyn

21,203 次观看 • 3 个月前

Rep. Smith did a masterful job of exposing the fact that Pete Hegseth and the trump regime have been LYING TO US about their reasons for waging war on Iran. You "obliterated" their nuclear materials last year? So then why are we 60 days into this war?

Rep. Smith did a masterful job of exposing the fact that Pete Hegseth and the trump regime have been LYING TO US about their reasons for waging war on Iran. You "obliterated" their nuclear materials last year? So then why are we 60 days into this war?

BrooklynDad_Defiant!☮️

108,235 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 Multiple Israeli officials are saying they “would NOT” consider the war a victory until Iran’s 400 kilos of enriched uranium is “controlled in some way.” “That does not appear to be the President’s goal here.” Trump said earlier today that Iran is now “incapable” of making a nuclear weapon, and that the US would monitor their enriched uranium from satellites and take action if Iran makes a move. “That has not been Israel’s goal at the start of this war,” reported Jim Sciutto. “I’ve been told by multiple Israeli officials that they would not consider the war a victory unless that 400 kilos of enriched uranium was controlled in some way.”

🚨 Multiple Israeli officials are saying they “would NOT” consider the war a victory until Iran’s 400 kilos of enriched uranium is “controlled in some way.” “That does not appear to be the President’s goal here.” Trump said earlier today that Iran is now “incapable” of making a nuclear weapon, and that the US would monitor their enriched uranium from satellites and take action if Iran makes a move. “That has not been Israel’s goal at the start of this war,” reported Jim Sciutto. “I’ve been told by multiple Israeli officials that they would not consider the war a victory unless that 400 kilos of enriched uranium was controlled in some way.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

148,281 次观看 • 4 个月前

BLITZER: Trump has said there was an 'imminent threat' from Iran. What's your understanding of that threat? REP. STUTZMAN: I think the imminent threat is they were going to continue to build -- rebuild -- their nuclear program BLITZER: But Trump said the nuclear facilities were 'obliterated.' So why the need to attack?

BLITZER: Trump has said there was an 'imminent threat' from Iran. What's your understanding of that threat? REP. STUTZMAN: I think the imminent threat is they were going to continue to build -- rebuild -- their nuclear program BLITZER: But Trump said the nuclear facilities were 'obliterated.' So why the need to attack?

Aaron Rupar

108,069 次观看 • 5 个月前

Mockler: This directly contradicts almost everything the administration has said. Rantz: It doesn’t Mockler: It absolutely has. Donald Trump has declared total victory multiple times. Rantz: He said that we’re winning. Mockler: He said that we won this war. Every weapon system that was actually a threat to us is still intact. Rantz: That’s not true. Mockler: That is absolutely true. Why are the ballistic missiles still firing? Why is the strait of hormuz closed?

Mockler: This directly contradicts almost everything the administration has said. Rantz: It doesn’t Mockler: It absolutely has. Donald Trump has declared total victory multiple times. Rantz: He said that we’re winning. Mockler: He said that we won this war. Every weapon system that was actually a threat to us is still intact. Rantz: That’s not true. Mockler: That is absolutely true. Why are the ballistic missiles still firing? Why is the strait of hormuz closed?

Acyn

187,002 次观看 • 4 个月前

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

Senator Ossoff: "Was it the assessment of the Intelligence Community that there was an 'imminent nuclear threat' posed by the Iranian regime?" Gabbard: "The only person who can determine what is and is not a threat is the President—" Ossoff: "False."

unusual_whales

356,379 次观看 • 4 个月前

Sunshine: Six months ago, Iran's nuclear program was completely obliterated and anybody that said otherwise was fake news. Now we have been told that somehow, they were able to restart the program. Now we are told that we have completely destroyed it again…. If all of that has been done, why are we still there?

Sunshine: Six months ago, Iran's nuclear program was completely obliterated and anybody that said otherwise was fake news. Now we have been told that somehow, they were able to restart the program. Now we are told that we have completely destroyed it again…. If all of that has been done, why are we still there?

Acyn

242,805 次观看 • 5 个月前

Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. Ossoff: It is precisely your responsibility. This is the worldwide threats hearing where, as you noted in your opening testimony quote, you represent the ic's assessment of threats.

Ossoff: Was it the assessment of the intelligence community that there was an imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime? Gabbard: The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president. It is not the intelligence community's responsibility to determine what is and is not an imminent threat. Ossoff: It is precisely your responsibility. This is the worldwide threats hearing where, as you noted in your opening testimony quote, you represent the ic's assessment of threats.

Acyn

1,815,651 次观看 • 4 个月前

WATCH: MS NOW’s Nicolle Wallace gushes over Joe Kent’s resignation letter from the Trump administration as the kind of thing that will be written about in history books... Wallace: “Tom Nichols, Mr. Kent writing this sort of sentence, that’ll — that’ll live on forever in the history of this chapter is written and the chapter on the war in Iran is written. I believe the sentence will be there: ‘I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.’ So writes the first senior national security official to depart Donald Trump’s isolationist political coalition in the aftermath of the of the Iran war being launched.” Nichols: “Well, the truest part of that was Kent saying that there was no imminent threat from Iran. There was nothing. There was no forcing function behind this war. It’s not like we knew that they were days or weeks or months from a nuclear bomb, although now that is the talking point the President seems to be holding on to for dear life. Just today, he talked about if it had, but not for me, there would have been a nuclear holocaust.”

WATCH: MS NOW’s Nicolle Wallace gushes over Joe Kent’s resignation letter from the Trump administration as the kind of thing that will be written about in history books... Wallace: “Tom Nichols, Mr. Kent writing this sort of sentence, that’ll — that’ll live on forever in the history of this chapter is written and the chapter on the war in Iran is written. I believe the sentence will be there: ‘I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.’ So writes the first senior national security official to depart Donald Trump’s isolationist political coalition in the aftermath of the of the Iran war being launched.” Nichols: “Well, the truest part of that was Kent saying that there was no imminent threat from Iran. There was nothing. There was no forcing function behind this war. It’s not like we knew that they were days or weeks or months from a nuclear bomb, although now that is the talking point the President seems to be holding on to for dear life. Just today, he talked about if it had, but not for me, there would have been a nuclear holocaust.”

Curtis Houck

59,060 次观看 • 4 个月前