Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Our devices are changing how we use our brains. Dr. Arthur Brooks makes a compelling point that constant device use fills every open moment with stimulation, and that may come at the expense of reflection, meaning, and self-understanding. Boredom feels uncomfortable, but it also gives the brain space to...

59,420 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Richard Dolan, on our need for collective self-reflection as we face the alien presence. 👽 "Here's another scenario, because I love to speculate about this. So what if these beings have an IQ of like 500+. Like they’re orders of magnitude beyond us. And they're telepathic, so they can crawl inside your mind. And they're part of their own hive mind so that they have instant access to a complete like encyclopedia, a Galactica Encyclopedia of information. And they have an emotional disposition that makes it so that maybe they don't laugh at all of your jokes. And they look at you and they can see your naked soul before them. So does it matter if they look human or not? If you're sitting in a room across from one of them and they're just staring at you? Well, that would be very intimidating, I think. And that doesn't strike me as impossible a scenario. "So if they are like that, we are going to have to find our own center of being. I mean, some people might think this sounds very wishy washy, but I've really come to believe that it is probably essential that, for us to deal with them, we need to have a very much better understanding of ourselves. "For example, think of the kind of society that we create. Constant stimulation. Constant screen attachment. Screen addiction. Waiting for the notifications. Bing bing bing. The endorphins. And we're constantly chasing, chasing after whatever we're chasing in this world of ours. Like the hamster wheel that you never get off of. That's the world for many of us. That is not a society conducive to self-examination and self-exploration. When you are dealing with a series of intelligences that are probably leaps and bounds beyond our operational capacity to begin with. "So if we're going actually to deal with them in any way that's meaningful, we probably need to just stop and engage in some seriously deep self-reflection about what we are. And then maybe that means spirituality, like it probably does, to be honest. And the kind of system that we've developed in our world, I just, at this point in my life, I don't think is all that conducive to us being able to effectively, psychologically relate to these other beings."

David Windt

54,218 просмотров • 1 год назад

20,000 people deliberately introduced boredom into their lives and generated 41% more breakthrough insights within one week. Yes, Dr. Manoush Zomorodi demonstrated what neuroscientists long suspected: "deliberate boredom boosts creative output and strengthens the brain’s capacity for original thinking." In that study, 20,000 participants added periods of unstimulated time to their routines, and experienced 41% more creative breakthrough moments within seven days. Your default mode network operates like a background processor that only runs when conscious attention stops demanding resources. During unstimulated moments, this network begins cross referencing every memory, skill, and experience you've accumulated, hunting for patterns your focused mind missed. The insights we call "creativity" are actually sophisticated pattern recognition happening below conscious awareness. Modern humans have accidentally trained themselves to interrupt this process every time it begins. The average person checks their phone 96 times per day. Every notification, every scroll, every background podcast cuts the neural pattern matching short before it completes. We've created a civilization where the mental state required for original thinking gets treated like an emergency that needs immediate correction. Watch people in waiting rooms, elevators, or checkout lines. The moment external stimulation drops below a certain threshold, hands automatically reach for phones. The discomfort they're avoiding is literally their brain attempting to do the background processing that produces breakthrough insights. Evolutionary biologists argue boredom developed as a survival mechanism. Animals that could sit unstimulated and let their minds wander were more likely to notice environmental changes, recognize new food sources, and develop innovative hunting strategies. Boredom forced our ancestors into the mental state where novel solutions emerge from existing knowledge. We've pathologized our most important cognitive function. The corporate world talks endlessly about innovation while designing work environments that make innovation neurologically impossible. Open offices with constant interruption. Back to back meetings with no processing time. Performance metrics that reward immediate output over deep thinking. Then companies spend millions on creativity consultants and innovation workshops, trying to artificially recreate what the human brain does naturally during sustained boredom. Participants in Zomorodi’s study generated more ideas and also described a welcome shift: during quiet, unstimulated moments, answers to long-running challenges often came into clear focus. With fewer distractions, their brains kept working on the underlying patterns and had the space to bring that recognition to completion. The quality gap between stimulated and unstimulated thinking becomes stark when you map it against major discoveries. The pattern repeats across every domain: breakthrough insights emerge during mental downtime, not during intense focus. Modern neuroscience explains why. The default mode network draws connections between brain regions that don't communicate during focused attention. Areas responsible for memory, emotion, sensory processing, and abstract thinking create novel combinations only when executive control relaxes. Constant stimulation keeps executive control active, blocking the cross domain communication that generates original ideas. Silicon Valley understood this before the research proved it. Google's famous "20% time" and similar policies were more thsn just about employee satisfaction. Companies discovered that structured boredom produces more valuable innovations than structured brainstorming sessions. Engineers who spend one day per week on self directed, unstimulated projects generate patents at higher rates than those focused solely on assigned tasks. The pharmaceutical industry treats boredom as a symptom of depression and prescribes stimulants to eliminate unstimulated mental states. Meanwhile, the same industry struggles with declining innovation rates in drug discovery. The connection isn't coincidental. Educational systems double down on the same mistake. Schools pack schedules with back to back classes, eliminate recess, and assign homework that fills every unstimulated moment. Then educators wonder why creative problem solving scores have declined for three consecutive decades. Students arrive at universities neurologically unprepared for the kind of open ended thinking that produces original research. The economic implications compound across generations. Industries that depend on creative problem solving hire workforces trained to avoid the mental states where creative problem solving occurs. Then they implement productivity tools and collaborative platforms that further fragment attention and eliminate the sustained boredom where breakthrough solutions develop. Zomorodi's experiment succeeded because participants actively resisted their conditioning. They scheduled specific periods of deliberate understimulation. They sat without phones, music, or conversation. They allowed their minds to wander without redirecting attention to productive tasks. Within days, their brains remembered how to complete the background processing that constant stimulation had been interrupting. The 41% increase in creative output came from creating better conditions for creativity to flow naturally, supported by replacing unhelpful habits with more supportive ones. Most people reading this will agree intellectually but continue reaching for stimulation the moment boredom threatens. The addiction to constant input runs deeper than conscious decision making. Your brain interprets unstimulated time as a threat that requires immediate correction. But those breakthrough insights you've been waiting for are sitting in your default mode network right now. They've been trying to surface for weeks, maybe months. Every time you reach for external stimulation, you're interrupting the neural process that would deliver them. Your next original idea is one boring afternoon away. The only question is whether you'll give it the unstimulated space it needs to emerge.

The Curious Tales

44,857 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Arteta on his role to re-energise the Arsenal team. 💪 “Certainly, when you lose a game, you have a lot of feelings because, especially, this group of players are so competitive and they seek for excellence and when you don't reach it, you ask yourself questions, and we did that. “But I think my role there as well is to bring optimism and reality about where we are, and yeah, our club has a long history. And to find a moment where, in February, we're in the position that we are, is very difficult to find. So guys, we are doing so many things so well, and let's focus mainly on that. And for sure, we want to improve, we want to be better in every area, but with that sense as well of self-confidence and conviction that we are in the right path. Anyone need to lift Arteta? “No, in these moments, no. Normally, I'm the opposite and when we are doing so well, I'm there with a stick to say, 'This is not good enough,' 'This is not good enough.' The other day, no, because I know how much they wanted the amount of games and the demands that we put on those players every day. “In those moments, they need to understand and feel that we are right behind them. I'm mainly responsible for that and they keep playing with that freedom, with that enjoyment, as I discussed the other day, and I make sure that that journey is beautiful because what is ahead is great and everybody has to be part of that but in a good sense and with good humor and with good optimism and looking forward to it.”

Connor Humm

17,767 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Elon Musk just compared artificial intelligence to a magic genie. The audience heard a fairy tale. He was describing a psychological collapse. Rishi Sunak asked him what happens to the labor market. Musk bypassed the economy entirely. Elon Musk: “There will come a point where no job is needed. You can have a job if you want to have a job for sort of personal satisfaction.” Everyone assumes losing your labor is the worst case. Musk just told you it is the best case. Lose your labor and you lose a paycheck. Lose your usefulness and you lose the reason you get out of bed. Musk: “One of the challenges in the future will be: how do we find meaning in life?” Look at the genie myth. Every version gives you exactly three wishes. The limit is the entire point. Scarcity forces you to choose. Choice is where meaning comes from. Musk: “You just have as many wishes as you want.” The limit is gone. Unlimited wishes means unlimited abundance. Unlimited abundance means zero friction. Human meaning has always been built entirely out of friction. We spent all of civilization building something that could grant our every request. We never stopped to ask what happens to the mind the morning after it gets exactly what it wanted. We thought the worst fate was a world that demanded everything from us. Maybe it is. But the generation that figures out how to build meaning without scarcity will be the first in history that chose purpose instead of having it forced on them. That is not a crisis. That is the hardest graduation ceremony the species has ever faced.

Dustin

32,227 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад