Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Out here still dreamin' about #ApeFest 🐒 What should we host next? 😶‍🌫️ #throwback with ELITE APES HK Animoca Brands AWS Startups Amazon Web Services Yuga Labs ApeCoin @phaverapp Weebox @Sleekcard

Moca Network

511,010 subscribers

22,847 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

Gaming #ApeFest #throwback

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Mocaverse💼🪐2 years ago

@animocabrands @AWSstartups @awscloud @yugalabs @apecoin @phaverapp @Weebox_Official @Sleekcard Stay vigilant and beware of scam links. Make sure you are connected to our official links and always crosscheck with the official team This is the last tweet in this thread

DL🚀🌕2 years ago

@EliteApesHK @animocabrands @AWSstartups @awscloud @yugalabs @apecoin @phaverapp @Weebox_Official @Sleekcard Miss you all ❤️

NADIR2 years ago

@EliteApesHK @animocabrands @AWSstartups @awscloud @yugalabs @apecoin @phaverapp @Weebox_Official @Sleekcard Mocaverse will be always on top🩷🫂 Mocaverse > Home

👁 KOLYAN TREND | NFT and METAVERSE 👁2 years ago

@EliteApesHK @animocabrands @AWSstartups @awscloud @yugalabs @apecoin @phaverapp @Weebox_Official @Sleekcard very cool event 🔥👍

GVG ✳️2 years ago

@EliteApesHK @animocabrands @AWSstartups @awscloud @yugalabs @apecoin @phaverapp @Weebox_Official @Sleekcard 😍

Sooltan 🧞‍♂️2 years ago

@EliteApesHK @animocabrands @AWSstartups @awscloud @yugalabs @apecoin @phaverapp @Weebox_Official @Sleekcard Moca fam needs to get to the Mena region would be the best growth strategy!

🥵 CEO of WeB 3.02 years ago

@EliteApesHK @animocabrands @AWSstartups @awscloud @yugalabs @apecoin @phaverapp @Weebox_Official @Sleekcard Looks amazing tbh

zayn2 years ago

@EliteApesHK @animocabrands @AWSstartups @awscloud @yugalabs @apecoin @phaverapp @Weebox_Official @Sleekcard E Mocaverse

MrHype 🔥2 years ago

@EliteApesHK @animocabrands @AWSstartups @awscloud @yugalabs @apecoin @phaverapp @Weebox_Official @Sleekcard 🔥🤝🔥

ALL CITY2 years ago

@EliteApesHK @animocabrands @AWSstartups @awscloud @yugalabs @apecoin @phaverapp @Weebox_Official @Sleekcard Best time!

Related Videos

Jeff Bezos explains Amazon’s process for expanding into new products like Kindle and AWS “I would definitely advise a small startup company to be as narrow and as focused as is possible to be. If you look at the original Amazon business plan, there was no hint of anything other than books in it… I wanted to build an online bookstore, and that was it.” But the online bookstore worked better than they thought it would. So Amazon launched music, and that worked better than they thought. Then video, and that worked too. So Jeff sent an email to customers: “I picked about 1,000 customers and I said, besides the things we sell today - books, music, and video - what would you like to see us sell? And the list came back incredibly long-tailed… So it’s been kind of one foot in front of the other.” As Jeff explains, Amazon expands into new businesses in two ways: “One is from a customer need. We will work from a customer need to the skills that we need. And the other one is skills forward: from a skillset we have to a new set of customers.” Kindle is an example of a customer need - Amazon had no hardware team at the time, but to make sure they didn’t miss the transition to ebooks, they built one. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is an example of skills-forward: “We had probably more distributed computing expertise than anybody else in the world because of transactions. Transaction systems are so complicated and hard to build, and we had a service-oriented architecture of great complexity - probably before anybody else. Because we were doing that, we could see the future a little bit and decided to build AWS, which has turned into a huge business in its own right.” Jeff concludes: “Business is very situational. Rules of thumb are good, but they have to be applied to the right situation. Sometimes the old maxim that you should stick to the knitting is correct, but sometimes it’s wrong. And a senior leader’s job is to figure out: Which situation are you in?” Video source: Business Insider (2014)

Jeff Bezos explains Amazon’s process for expanding into new products like Kindle and AWS “I would definitely advise a small startup company to be as narrow and as focused as is possible to be. If you look at the original Amazon business plan, there was no hint of anything other than books in it… I wanted to build an online bookstore, and that was it.” But the online bookstore worked better than they thought it would. So Amazon launched music, and that worked better than they thought. Then video, and that worked too. So Jeff sent an email to customers: “I picked about 1,000 customers and I said, besides the things we sell today - books, music, and video - what would you like to see us sell? And the list came back incredibly long-tailed… So it’s been kind of one foot in front of the other.” As Jeff explains, Amazon expands into new businesses in two ways: “One is from a customer need. We will work from a customer need to the skills that we need. And the other one is skills forward: from a skillset we have to a new set of customers.” Kindle is an example of a customer need - Amazon had no hardware team at the time, but to make sure they didn’t miss the transition to ebooks, they built one. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is an example of skills-forward: “We had probably more distributed computing expertise than anybody else in the world because of transactions. Transaction systems are so complicated and hard to build, and we had a service-oriented architecture of great complexity - probably before anybody else. Because we were doing that, we could see the future a little bit and decided to build AWS, which has turned into a huge business in its own right.” Jeff concludes: “Business is very situational. Rules of thumb are good, but they have to be applied to the right situation. Sometimes the old maxim that you should stick to the knitting is correct, but sometimes it’s wrong. And a senior leader’s job is to figure out: Which situation are you in?” Video source: Business Insider (2014)

Startup Archive

63,593 views • 10 months ago

It only needs a few crazy ones to fix a continent… Let's be crazy… I got something to announce: We're launching PROTOTYPE: a new fund, fully focused on Europe. A small fund that punches way above it's size. With it we back what Europe is world-class at: robotics, automation, manufacturing, and anything that requires hard engineering. First check. First round. As early as it gets. Europe invented industry. We're the birthplace of precision manufacturing. The second largest manufacturing hub on the planet. Leaders in automation and robotics. And yet… We sell out our best tech to China. We export our best founders & most of our investment money to the US. That's insanity. What should we do instead? Build the next trillion euro companies in robotics, manufacturing, automation right here: in Europe. Showcase to young founders what is possible and change the system around them where needed. What we will do: → Publish all our fund updates and build in public: → Showcase Europe’s Most Ambitious Startups on Youtube: → Launch & support more projects like EU–INC. Enough talking about Europe. Time to build it: Startups, makerspaces, student clubs, and much more. → And most importantly, invest into the best founders in Europe. Same model as our previous funds that are in their top 1-5% cohorts worldwide. We won’t do a VC fund in the classic sense. This will be a community of hyper-ambitious people who want to actively change Europe for the better. It only needs a few crazy ones to fix a continent… Let's be crazy. Check out

It only needs a few crazy ones to fix a continent… Let's be crazy… I got something to announce: We're launching PROTOTYPE: a new fund, fully focused on Europe. A small fund that punches way above it's size. With it we back what Europe is world-class at: robotics, automation, manufacturing, and anything that requires hard engineering. First check. First round. As early as it gets. Europe invented industry. We're the birthplace of precision manufacturing. The second largest manufacturing hub on the planet. Leaders in automation and robotics. And yet… We sell out our best tech to China. We export our best founders & most of our investment money to the US. That's insanity. What should we do instead? Build the next trillion euro companies in robotics, manufacturing, automation right here: in Europe. Showcase to young founders what is possible and change the system around them where needed. What we will do: → Publish all our fund updates and build in public: → Showcase Europe’s Most Ambitious Startups on Youtube: → Launch & support more projects like EU–INC. Enough talking about Europe. Time to build it: Startups, makerspaces, student clubs, and much more. → And most importantly, invest into the best founders in Europe. Same model as our previous funds that are in their top 1-5% cohorts worldwide. We won’t do a VC fund in the classic sense. This will be a community of hyper-ambitious people who want to actively change Europe for the better. It only needs a few crazy ones to fix a continent… Let's be crazy. Check out

Andreas Klinger 🦾

402,164 views • 6 months ago

Madonna is rolling out one of the most ambitious and complex eras of her career, backed by 360-degree partnerships with major brands and collaborators. The idea that her main goal is to break streaming records is almost absurd, what a boring objective that would be for someone like Madonna. Her goal has never been just numbers. It's about pushing boundaries, reminding people what fun looks like, what art can be, and what refusing to give up looks like after four decades in the spotlight. The people making shallow claims about streams seem to ignore one simple fact: her label, her brand partners, and her collaborators all know exactly what her streaming numbers are. They knew them before signing on, and they know them now. Yet here we are, watching one major partnership after another come together. That alone should tell you this era was never about chasing streams. It's about creating culture, conversation, and spectacle. And here's the uncomfortable truth for a lot of people: Confessions II already succeeds on its own terms and it's not because Madonna adapted to the modern pop landscape but because the modern pop landscape adapted to Madonna yet again. For over forty years, the industry has repeatedly caught up to ideas she introduced years earlier. The real story of this era isn't whether Madonna can compete with today's artists. It's whether today's artists can still compete with an artist who is redefining the rules at 67. #ConfessionsII #Madonna

Madonna Ultimate

40,463 views • 1 month ago

🚨🎙️Ben Foster on Why Jordan Henderson Could Be Exactly What Chelsea Need Ben Foster: “Do you remember when we played Liverpool at Vicarage Road?” Co-host: “Yeah.” Ben Foster: “There was one player in particular who stood out more than anybody else on that pitch. Liverpool beat us comfortably, I think it was 5-0 or 3-0, but the scoreline wasn’t even the thing that stayed with me. It was Jordan Henderson. Honestly, every single one of us came off that pitch saying exactly the same thing: ‘Wow, he’s so important to that team.’ You could feel his presence everywhere.” Co-host: “He was like an on-field manager.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. And that’s the thing people don’t always see when they’re watching on TV. They see the passes, the running, the tackles, but they don’t see the constant communication. He had so much quality, but his leadership was on another level entirely.” Co-host: “Even players like Mané and Salah were looking at him for information. You could see them turning to him for instructions, guidance, reassurance. It was like he was the heartbeat of the entire team.” Ben Foster: “That’s what blew me away. We’re talking about some of the best players in world football, and even they trusted Henderson’s voice. Every few seconds he was pointing, directing, organising, demanding more. To see it firsthand at the highest level was incredible.” Co-host: “At the very top level.” Ben Foster: “The absolute top level. And afterwards in the dressing room, every one of us was talking about him. We weren’t talking about Salah’s goals or Mané’s pace. We were talking about Henderson. That’s how much influence he had over that Liverpool side.” Co-host: “You could tell the players would run through a brick wall for him.” Ben Foster: “Without a doubt. If Henderson told them to push harder, they pushed harder. If he told them to stay calm, they stayed calm. If he told them to jump, they’d ask how high. That’s genuine leadership. That’s something you can’t teach.” Co-host: “And that’s why so many managers value him.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. In modern football, everybody talks about tactics, systems and technical ability, but dressing rooms still need leaders. They still need characters who can hold standards, keep players accountable and drive the group forward when things get difficult.” Co-host: “Which is probably why clubs keep looking at him despite his age.” Ben Foster: “One hundred percent. And if you ask me, that’s exactly why I think he’d be a fantastic addition for Chelsea. They’ve got talent everywhere you look. Young, exciting players with massive potential. But sometimes what takes a talented squad to the next level is having that experienced voice in the dressing room every single day.” Co-host: “Someone who sets the standards.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. Someone who demands excellence in training, someone who isn’t afraid to speak up when things aren’t right, someone who has won the biggest trophies and knows what it takes to get over the line. Henderson brings all of that.” Co-host: “You think that’s why Xabi Alonso was so keen on him as well?” Ben Foster: “Absolutely. Managers like Xabi Alonso understand that football isn’t just played with your feet, it’s played with your mentality. Henderson gives you leadership, professionalism, organisation and belief. Those qualities spread through a squad. That’s why I can completely understand why Alonso would go all in for him. Players like that are rare. They make everyone around them better.” Co-host: “So for Chelsea, it would be about more than just what he does on the pitch?” Ben Foster: “Much more. It’s about culture. It’s about mentality. It’s about helping young players understand what elite standards look like every single day. That’s what Jordan Henderson brings, and that’s why every manager who has worked with him speaks so highly of him. You don’t replace that easily.” (THE FOZCAST)

🚨🎙️Ben Foster on Why Jordan Henderson Could Be Exactly What Chelsea Need Ben Foster: “Do you remember when we played Liverpool at Vicarage Road?” Co-host: “Yeah.” Ben Foster: “There was one player in particular who stood out more than anybody else on that pitch. Liverpool beat us comfortably, I think it was 5-0 or 3-0, but the scoreline wasn’t even the thing that stayed with me. It was Jordan Henderson. Honestly, every single one of us came off that pitch saying exactly the same thing: ‘Wow, he’s so important to that team.’ You could feel his presence everywhere.” Co-host: “He was like an on-field manager.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. And that’s the thing people don’t always see when they’re watching on TV. They see the passes, the running, the tackles, but they don’t see the constant communication. He had so much quality, but his leadership was on another level entirely.” Co-host: “Even players like Mané and Salah were looking at him for information. You could see them turning to him for instructions, guidance, reassurance. It was like he was the heartbeat of the entire team.” Ben Foster: “That’s what blew me away. We’re talking about some of the best players in world football, and even they trusted Henderson’s voice. Every few seconds he was pointing, directing, organising, demanding more. To see it firsthand at the highest level was incredible.” Co-host: “At the very top level.” Ben Foster: “The absolute top level. And afterwards in the dressing room, every one of us was talking about him. We weren’t talking about Salah’s goals or Mané’s pace. We were talking about Henderson. That’s how much influence he had over that Liverpool side.” Co-host: “You could tell the players would run through a brick wall for him.” Ben Foster: “Without a doubt. If Henderson told them to push harder, they pushed harder. If he told them to stay calm, they stayed calm. If he told them to jump, they’d ask how high. That’s genuine leadership. That’s something you can’t teach.” Co-host: “And that’s why so many managers value him.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. In modern football, everybody talks about tactics, systems and technical ability, but dressing rooms still need leaders. They still need characters who can hold standards, keep players accountable and drive the group forward when things get difficult.” Co-host: “Which is probably why clubs keep looking at him despite his age.” Ben Foster: “One hundred percent. And if you ask me, that’s exactly why I think he’d be a fantastic addition for Chelsea. They’ve got talent everywhere you look. Young, exciting players with massive potential. But sometimes what takes a talented squad to the next level is having that experienced voice in the dressing room every single day.” Co-host: “Someone who sets the standards.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. Someone who demands excellence in training, someone who isn’t afraid to speak up when things aren’t right, someone who has won the biggest trophies and knows what it takes to get over the line. Henderson brings all of that.” Co-host: “You think that’s why Xabi Alonso was so keen on him as well?” Ben Foster: “Absolutely. Managers like Xabi Alonso understand that football isn’t just played with your feet, it’s played with your mentality. Henderson gives you leadership, professionalism, organisation and belief. Those qualities spread through a squad. That’s why I can completely understand why Alonso would go all in for him. Players like that are rare. They make everyone around them better.” Co-host: “So for Chelsea, it would be about more than just what he does on the pitch?” Ben Foster: “Much more. It’s about culture. It’s about mentality. It’s about helping young players understand what elite standards look like every single day. That’s what Jordan Henderson brings, and that’s why every manager who has worked with him speaks so highly of him. You don’t replace that easily.” (THE FOZCAST)

MatchReport

140,965 views • 6 days ago

Microsoft is about to sue its own golden child. $14 billion invested. Exclusive cloud rights. The most important AI partnership in history. And Sam Altman just went behind their back with a $50 billion Amazon deal. Here's why they're betraying each other: When Microsoft first invested in OpenAI in 2019, they locked in ONE rule above everything else... ALL access to OpenAI's models must go through Microsoft's Azure cloud. No exceptions. That deal made Azure the backbone of the AI revolution. Every company using ChatGPT's API was paying Microsoft for the privilege. It was the smartest infrastructure play of the decade. Then last month, OpenAI quietly signed a deal with Amazon. $50 billion. AWS becomes the exclusive third-party cloud provider for Frontier, OpenAI's new enterprise AI agent platform. $138 billion committed to Amazon cloud services. Microsoft found out and got really angry.... A person familiar with Microsoft's position told the Financial Times today: "We know our contract. We will sue them if they breach it. If Amazon and OpenAI want to take a bet on the creativity of their contractual lawyers, I would back us, not them." That's basically a declaration of war. And here's where it gets crazy: OpenAI and Amazon are trying to build a technical workaround. A system called the "Stateful Runtime Environment" that runs on Amazon's Bedrock platform. Their argument is that the system "only" handles memory and context for AI agents using enterprise data on AWS. It doesn't technically "invoke" OpenAI's core models through Amazon. Microsoft's response: Bullshit. The workaround violates the spirit of the deal even if it technically dances around the letter. Amazon knows they're on thin ice too. An internal memo leaked showing Amazon told employees exactly what language they can and can't use. They can say Frontier is "powered by OpenAI" or "enabled by OpenAI." But they CANNOT say customers can "access" or "invoke" OpenAI models on AWS. When you're coaching employees on which verbs to avoid, you know you're in trouble. But here's the thing everyone seems to forget: OpenAI is planning an IPO this year. They just closed a $110 billion funding round last month. So if Microsoft sues, the IPO timeline is DEAD. You can't go public while your biggest partner and investor is suing you for breach of contract. Elon Musk is already suing OpenAI separately for abandoning its nonprofit mission. Two active lawsuits from two of the most powerful people in tech. Against one company trying to IPO. Good luck with that S-1 filing. But WHY did Altman do this? Microsoft gave OpenAI everything. Capital. Infrastructure. Distribution. Enterprise customers. And Altman's response was to secretly build an escape route through Amazon... Because he saw what was coming: Microsoft launched Copilot. Their own AI product. Competing directly with ChatGPT. Microsoft started building their own models. Hiring their own AI researchers. Reducing dependency on OpenAI. So Altman did the same thing back. Found another cloud provider. Started building leverage. Both sides were preparing for divorce while still living in the same house. So the $50 billion Amazon deal was just an insurance policy against the day Microsoft decides it doesn't need OpenAI anymore. And Microsoft caught him packing his bags. What happens next: The companies are still talking. Trying to resolve this before Frontier launches. But Microsoft has made their position clear. Litigation is on the table. If this goes to court, it sets a precedent for every AI partnership in the industry. Every cloud deal. Every exclusive licensing agreement. The entire AI infrastructure map gets redrawn. Sam Altman built OpenAI on Microsoft's money, Microsoft's cloud, and Microsoft's trust. Then he signed a $50 billion deal with their biggest competitor. In any other industry they'd call that what it is.

Microsoft is about to sue its own golden child. $14 billion invested. Exclusive cloud rights. The most important AI partnership in history. And Sam Altman just went behind their back with a $50 billion Amazon deal. Here's why they're betraying each other: When Microsoft first invested in OpenAI in 2019, they locked in ONE rule above everything else... ALL access to OpenAI's models must go through Microsoft's Azure cloud. No exceptions. That deal made Azure the backbone of the AI revolution. Every company using ChatGPT's API was paying Microsoft for the privilege. It was the smartest infrastructure play of the decade. Then last month, OpenAI quietly signed a deal with Amazon. $50 billion. AWS becomes the exclusive third-party cloud provider for Frontier, OpenAI's new enterprise AI agent platform. $138 billion committed to Amazon cloud services. Microsoft found out and got really angry.... A person familiar with Microsoft's position told the Financial Times today: "We know our contract. We will sue them if they breach it. If Amazon and OpenAI want to take a bet on the creativity of their contractual lawyers, I would back us, not them." That's basically a declaration of war. And here's where it gets crazy: OpenAI and Amazon are trying to build a technical workaround. A system called the "Stateful Runtime Environment" that runs on Amazon's Bedrock platform. Their argument is that the system "only" handles memory and context for AI agents using enterprise data on AWS. It doesn't technically "invoke" OpenAI's core models through Amazon. Microsoft's response: Bullshit. The workaround violates the spirit of the deal even if it technically dances around the letter. Amazon knows they're on thin ice too. An internal memo leaked showing Amazon told employees exactly what language they can and can't use. They can say Frontier is "powered by OpenAI" or "enabled by OpenAI." But they CANNOT say customers can "access" or "invoke" OpenAI models on AWS. When you're coaching employees on which verbs to avoid, you know you're in trouble. But here's the thing everyone seems to forget: OpenAI is planning an IPO this year. They just closed a $110 billion funding round last month. So if Microsoft sues, the IPO timeline is DEAD. You can't go public while your biggest partner and investor is suing you for breach of contract. Elon Musk is already suing OpenAI separately for abandoning its nonprofit mission. Two active lawsuits from two of the most powerful people in tech. Against one company trying to IPO. Good luck with that S-1 filing. But WHY did Altman do this? Microsoft gave OpenAI everything. Capital. Infrastructure. Distribution. Enterprise customers. And Altman's response was to secretly build an escape route through Amazon... Because he saw what was coming: Microsoft launched Copilot. Their own AI product. Competing directly with ChatGPT. Microsoft started building their own models. Hiring their own AI researchers. Reducing dependency on OpenAI. So Altman did the same thing back. Found another cloud provider. Started building leverage. Both sides were preparing for divorce while still living in the same house. So the $50 billion Amazon deal was just an insurance policy against the day Microsoft decides it doesn't need OpenAI anymore. And Microsoft caught him packing his bags. What happens next: The companies are still talking. Trying to resolve this before Frontier launches. But Microsoft has made their position clear. Litigation is on the table. If this goes to court, it sets a precedent for every AI partnership in the industry. Every cloud deal. Every exclusive licensing agreement. The entire AI infrastructure map gets redrawn. Sam Altman built OpenAI on Microsoft's money, Microsoft's cloud, and Microsoft's trust. Then he signed a $50 billion deal with their biggest competitor. In any other industry they'd call that what it is.

Ricardo

209,425 views • 4 months ago

This guy accidentally swallowed a toothpick on his last night in Brazil and ended up at the public hospital in Rocinha favela around 1 AM. With language barriers and no one around, the hostel owner hooked him up with moto taxis and got him there fast. What happened next blew his mind: quick intake and vitals, multiple X-rays, a doctor consultation reviewing everything, and even free gut-health meds — all in about 20-25 minutes while they were also handling gunshot wounds and other serious cases. It’s the kind of story that makes you pause and think about how the US spends significantly more per person on healthcare than most countries with universal-style systems… Even though the US has a much larger population than most other developed countries, we already spend nearly twice as much per person on healthcare. Yet many Americans still face high insurance premiums, steep deductibles, and large out-of-pocket expenses — while roughly 4 in 10 adults carry some form of medical debt. Real experiences like his remind us that efficiency, speed, and affordability matter deeply — and why we keep wrestling with what that should look like here at home. Have you ever needed medical care while traveling abroad? How did it compare to what you’ve experienced in the US?

This guy accidentally swallowed a toothpick on his last night in Brazil and ended up at the public hospital in Rocinha favela around 1 AM. With language barriers and no one around, the hostel owner hooked him up with moto taxis and got him there fast. What happened next blew his mind: quick intake and vitals, multiple X-rays, a doctor consultation reviewing everything, and even free gut-health meds — all in about 20-25 minutes while they were also handling gunshot wounds and other serious cases. It’s the kind of story that makes you pause and think about how the US spends significantly more per person on healthcare than most countries with universal-style systems… Even though the US has a much larger population than most other developed countries, we already spend nearly twice as much per person on healthcare. Yet many Americans still face high insurance premiums, steep deductibles, and large out-of-pocket expenses — while roughly 4 in 10 adults carry some form of medical debt. Real experiences like his remind us that efficiency, speed, and affordability matter deeply — and why we keep wrestling with what that should look like here at home. Have you ever needed medical care while traveling abroad? How did it compare to what you’ve experienced in the US?

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

28,061 views • 2 months ago

What should the new administration do to support healthcare entrepreneurs? A few weeks ago I sat down with Dan Crenshaw , who sits on the House Subcommittee for Health, to discuss ways our government can make it easier to build in healthcare. We’re at a crisis point and need the private sector to improve productivity: more health outcomes with less labor and cost. Here are a couple of my ideas. What did I get wrong? And what else should be a priority? — Streamline Licensure, Credentialing, and Enrollment Telemedicine companies who want to treat patients across state lines are hamstrung by rules requiring providers see patients only in states where they have obtained licensure. In my eyes a doctor is a doctor: we should seek to recognize licensure from one state to another. Meanwhile, every high growth healthcare startup burns tens of thousands of dollars on every newly-hired provider – paying salary while waiting for slow credentialing and enrollment processes with payer organizations. What if we could create a national clearinghouse for credentialing and enrollment with a 1-week SLA? Such a change could improve the capital efficiency for innovative new companies. Reimbursement Reform For AI Time-based reimbursement codes (e.g. 99203 - New patient office visit, 30-44 minutes) require providers to spend a fixed amount of time on a visit in order to bill a code. But what if AI can enable a doctor to complete the visit more quickly? There’s no incentive for labor-saving innovation like every other part of the economy. This is silly! Let's align codes with value creation, not labor input. In general, we must create clear pathways to reward AI in care delivery – we have hundreds of AI companies already slashing administrative costs across the healthcare industry, but precious few success stories on the care delivery side. When software can complete a service described in a code (e.g. a diagnostic assessment), it should be eligible for reimbursement like a person. And while we need to ensure a quality and safety bar, we should not allow obviously-conflicted physicians’ groups to make determinations about what that bar is. Eliminate Unfair Preferences For Nonprofits Nonprofit organizations are not inherently more virtuous and better stewards of patient and taxpayer interests than for-profit businesses. And they are almost always run less efficiently than private sector equivalents. From Medicaid coverage to specialized programs like PACE, we should eliminate both explicit and implicit preference for nonprofit organizations and put them on a level playing field with entrepreneur-run startups. Taxpayer-funded healthcare should support the best and most effective provider groups, not the best-connected. Improve Interoperability to Support Healthcare IT The 21st Century Cures Act was signed into law at the end of 2016. In spite of its noble goal to require EHRs to expose an API and enable access to patient data, I still hear plenty of complaints from entrepreneurs about how difficult it can be to get data in and out of EHRs to build new AI applications. We need to investigate the state of play in interoperability: and find regulatory or statutory solutions that will make life easier for health IT startups. — I continue to be excited about the potential of value-based care – as long as models are constructed to provide strong incentives for true productivity improvement through care model and technology – and would like to see continued support for VBC across Medicare and Medicaid. One specific idea would be to revive CMMI’s Geographic DCE model – which (although canceled by the Biden administration) in my eyes could do a lot of good for Medicare beneficiaries across many rural geographies. What else should we be thinking about? (h/t Samir Unni for helping brainstorm)

What should the new administration do to support healthcare entrepreneurs? A few weeks ago I sat down with Dan Crenshaw , who sits on the House Subcommittee for Health, to discuss ways our government can make it easier to build in healthcare. We’re at a crisis point and need the private sector to improve productivity: more health outcomes with less labor and cost. Here are a couple of my ideas. What did I get wrong? And what else should be a priority? — Streamline Licensure, Credentialing, and Enrollment Telemedicine companies who want to treat patients across state lines are hamstrung by rules requiring providers see patients only in states where they have obtained licensure. In my eyes a doctor is a doctor: we should seek to recognize licensure from one state to another. Meanwhile, every high growth healthcare startup burns tens of thousands of dollars on every newly-hired provider – paying salary while waiting for slow credentialing and enrollment processes with payer organizations. What if we could create a national clearinghouse for credentialing and enrollment with a 1-week SLA? Such a change could improve the capital efficiency for innovative new companies. Reimbursement Reform For AI Time-based reimbursement codes (e.g. 99203 - New patient office visit, 30-44 minutes) require providers to spend a fixed amount of time on a visit in order to bill a code. But what if AI can enable a doctor to complete the visit more quickly? There’s no incentive for labor-saving innovation like every other part of the economy. This is silly! Let's align codes with value creation, not labor input. In general, we must create clear pathways to reward AI in care delivery – we have hundreds of AI companies already slashing administrative costs across the healthcare industry, but precious few success stories on the care delivery side. When software can complete a service described in a code (e.g. a diagnostic assessment), it should be eligible for reimbursement like a person. And while we need to ensure a quality and safety bar, we should not allow obviously-conflicted physicians’ groups to make determinations about what that bar is. Eliminate Unfair Preferences For Nonprofits Nonprofit organizations are not inherently more virtuous and better stewards of patient and taxpayer interests than for-profit businesses. And they are almost always run less efficiently than private sector equivalents. From Medicaid coverage to specialized programs like PACE, we should eliminate both explicit and implicit preference for nonprofit organizations and put them on a level playing field with entrepreneur-run startups. Taxpayer-funded healthcare should support the best and most effective provider groups, not the best-connected. Improve Interoperability to Support Healthcare IT The 21st Century Cures Act was signed into law at the end of 2016. In spite of its noble goal to require EHRs to expose an API and enable access to patient data, I still hear plenty of complaints from entrepreneurs about how difficult it can be to get data in and out of EHRs to build new AI applications. We need to investigate the state of play in interoperability: and find regulatory or statutory solutions that will make life easier for health IT startups. — I continue to be excited about the potential of value-based care – as long as models are constructed to provide strong incentives for true productivity improvement through care model and technology – and would like to see continued support for VBC across Medicare and Medicaid. One specific idea would be to revive CMMI’s Geographic DCE model – which (although canceled by the Biden administration) in my eyes could do a lot of good for Medicare beneficiaries across many rural geographies. What else should we be thinking about? (h/t Samir Unni for helping brainstorm)

Sebastian Caliri

34,338 views • 1 year ago

Announcing the Operators Only Podcast An experiment I'm running with Rameel Sheikh ⚙️ where we talk to startup operators who built iconic startups and/or are building the next breakout companies. First episode is with Preeya Goenka 🐝, the COO at beehiiv 🐝. - Preeya joined Beehiiv as employee #7 and Tyler Denk 🐝's chief of staff. - In case you live under a rock, Beehiiv's one of the fastest growing companies in tech right now. Impossible to be on Twitter and not hear about them. - She's played a big role in their success. - Excited for more folks to get to know her story and see some of the behind the scenes of how they're building Beehiiv. - We talked about her journey prior to Beehiiv, how she met Tyler, why/when founders should hire a chief of staff (including why my tweet saying the opposite is wrong), acquihires, and more. Give the show a listen on Youtube, Spotify, and wherever you listen to podcasts. (link further in the thread) ----- A couple notes on why I wanted to do this: - I've long felt that startup operators are some of the most unsung heroes in tech. - We constantly hear the same stories from the same founders (especially CEOs) and VCs involved in successful companies. - Much less common to hear from the early employees that made big but less appreciated contributions to making these companies successful. - These folks are the unsung heroes of the startup world. We think their stories should be told more often. - Lastly, I think we need spaces for more nuanced conversations with builders in startups. Too much fluff and surface level narrative in most tech media. Not enough depth about the craft of the game itself. Transparently, I don't think we've yet created the perfect representation of what I want to exist. But I think we've made a good start and will iterate from here. --- This is very much a WIP. And we're new to podcasting. Figuring out the format as we go. Any feedback on how we can make the show better, questions to ask, guests to have on, etc.... is welcome. 🙏

Announcing the Operators Only Podcast An experiment I'm running with Rameel Sheikh ⚙️ where we talk to startup operators who built iconic startups and/or are building the next breakout companies. First episode is with Preeya Goenka 🐝, the COO at beehiiv 🐝. - Preeya joined Beehiiv as employee #7 and Tyler Denk 🐝's chief of staff. - In case you live under a rock, Beehiiv's one of the fastest growing companies in tech right now. Impossible to be on Twitter and not hear about them. - She's played a big role in their success. - Excited for more folks to get to know her story and see some of the behind the scenes of how they're building Beehiiv. - We talked about her journey prior to Beehiiv, how she met Tyler, why/when founders should hire a chief of staff (including why my tweet saying the opposite is wrong), acquihires, and more. Give the show a listen on Youtube, Spotify, and wherever you listen to podcasts. (link further in the thread) ----- A couple notes on why I wanted to do this: - I've long felt that startup operators are some of the most unsung heroes in tech. - We constantly hear the same stories from the same founders (especially CEOs) and VCs involved in successful companies. - Much less common to hear from the early employees that made big but less appreciated contributions to making these companies successful. - These folks are the unsung heroes of the startup world. We think their stories should be told more often. - Lastly, I think we need spaces for more nuanced conversations with builders in startups. Too much fluff and surface level narrative in most tech media. Not enough depth about the craft of the game itself. Transparently, I don't think we've yet created the perfect representation of what I want to exist. But I think we've made a good start and will iterate from here. --- This is very much a WIP. And we're new to podcasting. Figuring out the format as we go. Any feedback on how we can make the show better, questions to ask, guests to have on, etc.... is welcome. 🙏

Andrew Rea

11,394 views • 1 year ago

How Kon Knueppel scores 18.5 PPG with only 2 dribbles per catch One thing that stands out about Kon Knueppel’s game is how quickly he plays without rushing. He doesn’t need the ball to stick. He doesn’t need 10 dribbles. And he doesn’t need a flashy combo move every possession. Kon averaged less than 2 dribbles per touch and possessed the ball only about 7% of the time he was on the floor… Yet he still averaged 18.5 PPG and earned 1st Team All-Rookie honors. That should get everybody’s attention. Because it proves you do not have to dominate the ball to impact the game. You just have to be ready, make quick decisions, and flow into the next action. That’s what makes players like Kon so effective. Shoot off the catch. Attack in straight lines. Land on two feet and finish. If nothing is there… pass, relocate, and keep moving. That’s also one of the things we like about Coach Bob Patton’s Modern Game Shooting workouts. Players aren’t just standing still getting shots up. They’re constantly moving through game-like sequences where they have to prepare, attack, pass, relocate, reset their feet, and flow into the next action without pausing. A lot of modern scoring is about connecting actions together quickly and efficiently. See the complete Modern Game Shooting System here: 📷 The promo ends TONIGHT.

How Kon Knueppel scores 18.5 PPG with only 2 dribbles per catch One thing that stands out about Kon Knueppel’s game is how quickly he plays without rushing. He doesn’t need the ball to stick. He doesn’t need 10 dribbles. And he doesn’t need a flashy combo move every possession. Kon averaged less than 2 dribbles per touch and possessed the ball only about 7% of the time he was on the floor… Yet he still averaged 18.5 PPG and earned 1st Team All-Rookie honors. That should get everybody’s attention. Because it proves you do not have to dominate the ball to impact the game. You just have to be ready, make quick decisions, and flow into the next action. That’s what makes players like Kon so effective. Shoot off the catch. Attack in straight lines. Land on two feet and finish. If nothing is there… pass, relocate, and keep moving. That’s also one of the things we like about Coach Bob Patton’s Modern Game Shooting workouts. Players aren’t just standing still getting shots up. They’re constantly moving through game-like sequences where they have to prepare, attack, pass, relocate, reset their feet, and flow into the next action without pausing. A lot of modern scoring is about connecting actions together quickly and efficiently. See the complete Modern Game Shooting System here: 📷 The promo ends TONIGHT.

Joe Haefner | Breakthrough Basketball

83,337 views • 2 months ago

David Sacks: “FDA for AI” is fake news, but here’s why it’s making headlines @jason: “ Who's leading Trump down the path of regulation and creating this AI FDA?” David Sacks: “I think there's several things going on here. The first one is, there's a lot of fake news. This whole idea of an FDA for AI, I don't think any senior official supports it. Certainly, I don't think that's the way the president thinks about these issues. He's the most pro-innovation president we've ever had. And the White House Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, just put out a statement last night that I think pretty much shoots this down. Second, there's another thing going on, which is a straw manning of what the Trump administration did on AI in its first year. In the same way that they want to spin this FDA for AI, they're also trying to spin what we did as this completely laissez-faire attitude, where there'd be no regulations whatsoever, nor guardrails. It's a way of criticizing what we did. They're trying to portray it as unsafe. In fact, if you look, on March 20th, the White House released a national AI regulatory framework in which we put out a four-page bulleted list of legislation that we would support. So we have not been against every conceivable regulation or every conceivable law, we just believe that there should be specific solutions to specific problems, as opposed to a giant power grab by Washington that would squash innovation. Point number three is, there is a legitimate thing happening here with, let's call it Mythos or cyber. Within 3-6 months, all the major frontier labs, including Chinese models, will have cyber capabilities. In response to that, we do need there to be a hardening of systems, and we do need there to be a scanning of codebases to find these vulnerabilities and patch them before the hackers do it. Because the hackers will have these capabilities in a matter of months. That's a certainty. So we do need a response to that. Now, my view on what should that response be, first of all, we should want the government and the private sector to work cooperatively, and I think they are. What we should be doing, I think, is getting these tools, Mythos, and then the OpenAI model, and others like it, in the hands of our cybersecurity industry. And by the way, not just the public companies like Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, although certainly they're two of the most noteworthy, but there's also some incredibly strong startups on the way up. We need to get these tools into their hands as quickly as possible because they're a force multiplier for all the companies out there that aren't that good at cybersecurity, they can use these companies as vendors. And just one last point on this whole thing is, both Anthropic and OpenAI acted responsibly here. No one was trying to release these super powerful models. So in a way, all the people who are saying that we need pre-release approvals for models, they're trying to solve a problem that didn't exist. Yes, we do have this cyber issue, but that is a problem that we will solve over the next six months. What they're trying to do is use that issue to try and create a permanent new infrastructure in Washington. The classic 'never let a crisis go to waste' strategy.”

David Sacks: “FDA for AI” is fake news, but here’s why it’s making headlines @jason: “ Who's leading Trump down the path of regulation and creating this AI FDA?” David Sacks: “I think there's several things going on here. The first one is, there's a lot of fake news. This whole idea of an FDA for AI, I don't think any senior official supports it. Certainly, I don't think that's the way the president thinks about these issues. He's the most pro-innovation president we've ever had. And the White House Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, just put out a statement last night that I think pretty much shoots this down. Second, there's another thing going on, which is a straw manning of what the Trump administration did on AI in its first year. In the same way that they want to spin this FDA for AI, they're also trying to spin what we did as this completely laissez-faire attitude, where there'd be no regulations whatsoever, nor guardrails. It's a way of criticizing what we did. They're trying to portray it as unsafe. In fact, if you look, on March 20th, the White House released a national AI regulatory framework in which we put out a four-page bulleted list of legislation that we would support. So we have not been against every conceivable regulation or every conceivable law, we just believe that there should be specific solutions to specific problems, as opposed to a giant power grab by Washington that would squash innovation. Point number three is, there is a legitimate thing happening here with, let's call it Mythos or cyber. Within 3-6 months, all the major frontier labs, including Chinese models, will have cyber capabilities. In response to that, we do need there to be a hardening of systems, and we do need there to be a scanning of codebases to find these vulnerabilities and patch them before the hackers do it. Because the hackers will have these capabilities in a matter of months. That's a certainty. So we do need a response to that. Now, my view on what should that response be, first of all, we should want the government and the private sector to work cooperatively, and I think they are. What we should be doing, I think, is getting these tools, Mythos, and then the OpenAI model, and others like it, in the hands of our cybersecurity industry. And by the way, not just the public companies like Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, although certainly they're two of the most noteworthy, but there's also some incredibly strong startups on the way up. We need to get these tools into their hands as quickly as possible because they're a force multiplier for all the companies out there that aren't that good at cybersecurity, they can use these companies as vendors. And just one last point on this whole thing is, both Anthropic and OpenAI acted responsibly here. No one was trying to release these super powerful models. So in a way, all the people who are saying that we need pre-release approvals for models, they're trying to solve a problem that didn't exist. Yes, we do have this cyber issue, but that is a problem that we will solve over the next six months. What they're trying to do is use that issue to try and create a permanent new infrastructure in Washington. The classic 'never let a crisis go to waste' strategy.”

The All-In Podcast

150,106 views • 2 months ago

if you're on tech twitter chances are you've seen Arlan the (newly) 19 year-old wunderkind from kazakhstan was YC's youngest solo founder, got backing from the likes of PG himself, and raised a $6.2 million seed for his company Nozomio Labs oh btw, did we mention he's a hs dropout? we sat down with arlan rakhmetzhanov to talk about one of the most unhinged gen-z founder stories we’ve ever heard. he started coding at 15. got rejected by every accelerator. took investor calls during class and got kicked out. then chased paul graham at 10PM and turned that into an investment. now with nozomio, he’s taking AI's biggest problem — context. 01:05 - Dropping out of high school in Kazakhstan to go all-in on startups 02:39 - Teaching himself to code + building iOS apps at 15 05:08 - Getting rejected by every accelerator… then finally getting into one 05:57 - Raising his first round while still in school (and getting kicked out for taking calls) 14:40- Building “Google for agents” — indexing and searching context across data 19:29 - His vision to “kill search” and rebuild it for the AI agent era 23:30 - Chasing Paul Graham in a parking lot after getting rejected — and turning it into an investment 27:12 - Why AI is enabling solo founders for the first time 31:12 - Why young founders should stop learning and just start building 32:45 - Whether this is the next dot-com bubble… or something bigger (plus some of that good sf vs nyc debate for founders)

if you're on tech twitter chances are you've seen Arlan the (newly) 19 year-old wunderkind from kazakhstan was YC's youngest solo founder, got backing from the likes of PG himself, and raised a $6.2 million seed for his company Nozomio Labs oh btw, did we mention he's a hs dropout? we sat down with arlan rakhmetzhanov to talk about one of the most unhinged gen-z founder stories we’ve ever heard. he started coding at 15. got rejected by every accelerator. took investor calls during class and got kicked out. then chased paul graham at 10PM and turned that into an investment. now with nozomio, he’s taking AI's biggest problem — context. 01:05 - Dropping out of high school in Kazakhstan to go all-in on startups 02:39 - Teaching himself to code + building iOS apps at 15 05:08 - Getting rejected by every accelerator… then finally getting into one 05:57 - Raising his first round while still in school (and getting kicked out for taking calls) 14:40- Building “Google for agents” — indexing and searching context across data 19:29 - His vision to “kill search” and rebuild it for the AI agent era 23:30 - Chasing Paul Graham in a parking lot after getting rejected — and turning it into an investment 27:12 - Why AI is enabling solo founders for the first time 31:12 - Why young founders should stop learning and just start building 32:45 - Whether this is the next dot-com bubble… or something bigger (plus some of that good sf vs nyc debate for founders)

The Cap Table

104,539 views • 3 months ago

China is Changing Faster Than We Realize 🚀 Outdated Perceptions: Many still see China as if it’s stuck in the 1980s or 1990s, just like we often picture the U.S. through a nostalgic golden age. This creates a huge gap between perception and reality. Rapid Development: Even those living in China struggle to keep up with the speed of change. Cities like Shanghai and Chongqing look like something out of a sci-fi movie—no wonder foreigners are surprised! See It for Yourself: If you really want to know whether what you hear about China is propaganda or reality, visit and experience it firsthand. Life in Cities is Insanely Convenient:Order groceries, takeout, or even cleaning services with a tap on your phone—delivered in 30 minutes. No need for keys or wallets anymore—your phone handles everything. High-speed rail has cut travel times dramatically (Beijing to Hubei in just over 3 hours instead of a full day). Technology & Innovation: EV boom: Xiaomi and other Chinese brands are rolling out sleek electric cars everywhere. AI & Robotics: This year’s Spring Festival gala even featured dancing robots—who knows what’s next? The Bigger Picture: My family’s journey—from the countryside to the city, from slow trains to bullet trains—reflects how fast China is moving forward. Breaking Stereotypes: The recent reconciliation is powerful because it encourages real understanding. The world is evolving—are we keeping up? #China #Innovation #ChangingPerspectives #Future

China is Changing Faster Than We Realize 🚀 Outdated Perceptions: Many still see China as if it’s stuck in the 1980s or 1990s, just like we often picture the U.S. through a nostalgic golden age. This creates a huge gap between perception and reality. Rapid Development: Even those living in China struggle to keep up with the speed of change. Cities like Shanghai and Chongqing look like something out of a sci-fi movie—no wonder foreigners are surprised! See It for Yourself: If you really want to know whether what you hear about China is propaganda or reality, visit and experience it firsthand. Life in Cities is Insanely Convenient:Order groceries, takeout, or even cleaning services with a tap on your phone—delivered in 30 minutes. No need for keys or wallets anymore—your phone handles everything. High-speed rail has cut travel times dramatically (Beijing to Hubei in just over 3 hours instead of a full day). Technology & Innovation: EV boom: Xiaomi and other Chinese brands are rolling out sleek electric cars everywhere. AI & Robotics: This year’s Spring Festival gala even featured dancing robots—who knows what’s next? The Bigger Picture: My family’s journey—from the countryside to the city, from slow trains to bullet trains—reflects how fast China is moving forward. Breaking Stereotypes: The recent reconciliation is powerful because it encourages real understanding. The world is evolving—are we keeping up? #China #Innovation #ChangingPerspectives #Future

Johannes Maria

107,234 views • 1 year ago

I did a lot of interviews today about Hantavirus and tried to answer a lot of questions. If you're freaking out, here are things you should know: 1) I'm not freaking out. Like, at all. On a scale of 1-10 of worry, I'm at <1. I've spent a long time preparing for and responding to dangerous outbreaks. I've worked onboard vessels at sea that needed to disembark sick passengers. THIS situation is not my nightmare, promise. 2) When WOULD I freak out? If we learned that transmission was much more common and much easier than what we've seen so far, and that many more people were sick. I do expect a few more positive cases, and wouldn't be surprised if we seen a few tied to folks who traveled back to their homes. But I don't expect hundreds of cases. Or thousands. Or for this to be the next pandemic, at all. 3) What I'm being careful about—We know a lot about this type of Hantavirus, but there's still a lot we can learn. Over the next few weeks, we'll get a better understanding of how well it transmits, who might be at greater risk, and whether we need to update what we thought we knew. But transmission on a cruise ship likely doesn't reflect much about how this plays out in the 'real world'. Suffice it to say, we're gonna learn a lot, and some things we 'know' will likely change. 4) The U.S. is catching up—sending CDC disease detectives to the ship to accompany American passengers home—but we were WAY too flat-footed here. We should've been on the ball earlier on. But when we pull down the systems we've built over decades to respond to stuff like this—think all the USAID cuts, the CDC cuts, the NIH cuts, and severing the relationship with the WHO—we are gonna be spending a lot of time catching up as opposed to leading the response. That's a huge shame. 5) The WHO is doing a helluva job right now. They have put out real clear communications, are working with governments to coordinate travel and quarantines and testing. We would be in a MUCH MUCH worse spot right now if it wasn't for the WHO, promise. 6) The American passengers are going to a special facility in Nebraska for 'special pathogens' like Hantavirus. Many folks don't know that we have over a dozen specialized centers all over the U.S. that can treat patients just like this. We keep them on the ready at all times, which takes massive amounts of human resources, supplies, and funding. Thankfully their funding has been protected over the past decade, but this is exactly why we need to maintain support for this constant readiness. We'd never take away firefighters' hoses and water and expect them to respond perfectly to the next fire...we must treat preparation for all health threats the same! 7) The folks I'm talking to at the CDC—the 'boots on the ground' disease detectives and epidemiologists—are doing amazing work. But where the hell is our health leadership right now? RFK Jr, are you going to say anything about what we're doing to respond? I'll share soon, and let me know your questions below...

I did a lot of interviews today about Hantavirus and tried to answer a lot of questions. If you're freaking out, here are things you should know: 1) I'm not freaking out. Like, at all. On a scale of 1-10 of worry, I'm at <1. I've spent a long time preparing for and responding to dangerous outbreaks. I've worked onboard vessels at sea that needed to disembark sick passengers. THIS situation is not my nightmare, promise. 2) When WOULD I freak out? If we learned that transmission was much more common and much easier than what we've seen so far, and that many more people were sick. I do expect a few more positive cases, and wouldn't be surprised if we seen a few tied to folks who traveled back to their homes. But I don't expect hundreds of cases. Or thousands. Or for this to be the next pandemic, at all. 3) What I'm being careful about—We know a lot about this type of Hantavirus, but there's still a lot we can learn. Over the next few weeks, we'll get a better understanding of how well it transmits, who might be at greater risk, and whether we need to update what we thought we knew. But transmission on a cruise ship likely doesn't reflect much about how this plays out in the 'real world'. Suffice it to say, we're gonna learn a lot, and some things we 'know' will likely change. 4) The U.S. is catching up—sending CDC disease detectives to the ship to accompany American passengers home—but we were WAY too flat-footed here. We should've been on the ball earlier on. But when we pull down the systems we've built over decades to respond to stuff like this—think all the USAID cuts, the CDC cuts, the NIH cuts, and severing the relationship with the WHO—we are gonna be spending a lot of time catching up as opposed to leading the response. That's a huge shame. 5) The WHO is doing a helluva job right now. They have put out real clear communications, are working with governments to coordinate travel and quarantines and testing. We would be in a MUCH MUCH worse spot right now if it wasn't for the WHO, promise. 6) The American passengers are going to a special facility in Nebraska for 'special pathogens' like Hantavirus. Many folks don't know that we have over a dozen specialized centers all over the U.S. that can treat patients just like this. We keep them on the ready at all times, which takes massive amounts of human resources, supplies, and funding. Thankfully their funding has been protected over the past decade, but this is exactly why we need to maintain support for this constant readiness. We'd never take away firefighters' hoses and water and expect them to respond perfectly to the next fire...we must treat preparation for all health threats the same! 7) The folks I'm talking to at the CDC—the 'boots on the ground' disease detectives and epidemiologists—are doing amazing work. But where the hell is our health leadership right now? RFK Jr, are you going to say anything about what we're doing to respond? I'll share soon, and let me know your questions below...

Craig Spencer MD MPH

116,811 views • 2 months ago

🚨 THEY’RE NOT JUST WATCHING YOU THEY’RE INSIDE YOUR MIND RIGHT NOW MK ULTRA 2.0 is LIVE. 🚨 Amazon, X, Facebook, all social media's, ANOTHER PURPOSE FOR THE DATA CENTERS! Google's CIA-built cloud isn’t storing your photos… It’s mapping your thoughts, syncing your brainwaves, and turning humanity into remote-controlled puppets. This isn’t sci-fi. This is the silent war they never told you about. Watch this explosive video exposing: - Whistleblower Bryan Kofron revealing Security Industry Specialists’ role in targeting citizens. - DARPA brain implants & neural interfaces. - Patents that prove they can read, write, and hijack your brain activity. - How Amazon Web Services + CIA tech = Electronic Brain Link for mass control. Reply and Tag 5 Friends! Let’s break the matrix! If your thoughts can be read and influenced through your phone/cloud… how many of your “decisions” |are actually yours? Why is Amazon (CIA contractor) pushing Neural tech while everyone’s addicted to Alexa and Prime? Have you felt random mood swings, brain fog, or “forgotten” thoughts lately? Could it be more than stress? Who benefits from a population that’s anxious, divided, and easily triggered? Follow the patents. What’s your first step to reclaim your mind? (No fluoride, ground yourself, detox, awareness?) DROP a like if you’re not their puppet anymore. RT + Comment your #1 question Below. The algorithm can’t hide this forever. Share this with 5 people who still think it’s “just a conspiracy.” The Great Awakening isn’t coming... it’s HERE. Let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And check out the thread below 👇

🚨 THEY’RE NOT JUST WATCHING YOU THEY’RE INSIDE YOUR MIND RIGHT NOW MK ULTRA 2.0 is LIVE. 🚨 Amazon, X, Facebook, all social media's, ANOTHER PURPOSE FOR THE DATA CENTERS! Google's CIA-built cloud isn’t storing your photos… It’s mapping your thoughts, syncing your brainwaves, and turning humanity into remote-controlled puppets. This isn’t sci-fi. This is the silent war they never told you about. Watch this explosive video exposing: - Whistleblower Bryan Kofron revealing Security Industry Specialists’ role in targeting citizens. - DARPA brain implants & neural interfaces. - Patents that prove they can read, write, and hijack your brain activity. - How Amazon Web Services + CIA tech = Electronic Brain Link for mass control. Reply and Tag 5 Friends! Let’s break the matrix! If your thoughts can be read and influenced through your phone/cloud… how many of your “decisions” |are actually yours? Why is Amazon (CIA contractor) pushing Neural tech while everyone’s addicted to Alexa and Prime? Have you felt random mood swings, brain fog, or “forgotten” thoughts lately? Could it be more than stress? Who benefits from a population that’s anxious, divided, and easily triggered? Follow the patents. What’s your first step to reclaim your mind? (No fluoride, ground yourself, detox, awareness?) DROP a like if you’re not their puppet anymore. RT + Comment your #1 question Below. The algorithm can’t hide this forever. Share this with 5 people who still think it’s “just a conspiracy.” The Great Awakening isn’t coming... it’s HERE. Let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And check out the thread below 👇

Noah B. Price

11,783 views • 1 month ago

AI legal startups are a thing in 2024. But as Ironclad’s Jason Boehmig puts it, “nobody was trying to buy an AI legal assistant back in 2015.” Ironclad has one of the most interesting and underexplored stories out there IMO. As we were developing First Round's PMF Method, we learned so much from their journey — super grateful Jason took the time to share his insights for other builders. 🙏 Here were a few of my takeaways: 🔬 Zoom in to find focus “It was actually fairly easy to sign up early customers — what was difficult was finding a product that could address that market. That took us several years of iteration. We had to try to figure out what pieces we could peel off into a repeatable, discrete software product. We quickly realized the really interesting part of the problem was in repeatable business transactions — sales agreements, employment agreements, NDAs licensing agreements, partnership agreements. A lot of our competitors tried to do everything that corporate legal teams do. But we were only doing the contract part.” 📣 Expand an existing category (with an existing buying cycle) But the initial AI legal assistant positioning wasn’t resonating. I’ve talked to 100s of founders about PMF and the story of how Ironclad got unstuck is one of the wildest ones I’ve heard. “100% of the time I had to explain what an AI legal assistant was. We had a hello@ironclad.ai email on our site. One day I got a one-liner message that said, ‘Hello, are you a CLM?’ I was so close to hitting archive, but it was from someone at a publicly traded company. But what was a CLM? Turns out it’s a Contract Lifecycle Management platform that helps enterprise companies create and manage their legal contracts. By that definition, we were. So of course I wrote back, ‘Yes, we are definitely a CLM, we would love to come demo our CLM for you.’ But while we were really great at creating contracts with our AI legal assistant product, we hadn't put a lot of thought into how you deal with contracts afterwards, with a feature called a repository. And so we had set up this demo with the legal team from this publicly traded company, and I turned to my co-founder Cai, and said, ‘By the way, we have 3 hours to build a repository.’ We took the train from SF to San Jose and he built the first version of a repository, which we demoed live at the end of the train ride. This customer was in a CLM evaluation cycle that had 12 other solutions in it, but they loved the demo. So we went and actually built the full product, and we won. And after that, of course, we changed our messaging. We got serious about building CLM functionality and that's our flagship product to this day. There were lots of people out there trying to buy a CLM so we just got to participate in a lot of buying cycles, but with the AI legal assistant buying cycle, we had to create every one of those.” 👥 Artificially constrain the buyer and build community early “One of the things that we did which was really helpful in hindsight was we artificially constrained the buyer we were going after. Once we decided to make the shift to enterprise, instead of trying to address the whole US market or the whole global market, we decided we only cared about being the number one CLM in SoMa. We got a list of every company that could use the CLM in SoMa and got intros to them — it just provided a ton of focus for us. It's how we also stumbled into doing community. We would host these community dinners and if you were a general counsel of a company based in SoMa, you probably knew other people that were coming to them. We just started to get this buzz of ‘Are you going to the Ironclad thing tonight?’ There's a ton of value if you can discover a part of the organization that no one cares about, and connect that part of the organization to a larger business problem.” 📚 Founder-led sales is learnable I was impressed to learn that Jason still sends cold outreach himself to this day. But founder-led sales didn’t come naturally. “A misconception I had about early-stage startups was that the cartoon character salesperson who's slapping everyone on the back and is a total extrovert is the best salesperson. And it's actually the person who's almost like an engineer in their mindset — super methodical, sends great follow ups, could be very shy. It's a very learnable skill.”

AI legal startups are a thing in 2024. But as Ironclad’s Jason Boehmig puts it, “nobody was trying to buy an AI legal assistant back in 2015.” Ironclad has one of the most interesting and underexplored stories out there IMO. As we were developing First Round's PMF Method, we learned so much from their journey — super grateful Jason took the time to share his insights for other builders. 🙏 Here were a few of my takeaways: 🔬 Zoom in to find focus “It was actually fairly easy to sign up early customers — what was difficult was finding a product that could address that market. That took us several years of iteration. We had to try to figure out what pieces we could peel off into a repeatable, discrete software product. We quickly realized the really interesting part of the problem was in repeatable business transactions — sales agreements, employment agreements, NDAs licensing agreements, partnership agreements. A lot of our competitors tried to do everything that corporate legal teams do. But we were only doing the contract part.” 📣 Expand an existing category (with an existing buying cycle) But the initial AI legal assistant positioning wasn’t resonating. I’ve talked to 100s of founders about PMF and the story of how Ironclad got unstuck is one of the wildest ones I’ve heard. “100% of the time I had to explain what an AI legal assistant was. We had a [email protected] email on our site. One day I got a one-liner message that said, ‘Hello, are you a CLM?’ I was so close to hitting archive, but it was from someone at a publicly traded company. But what was a CLM? Turns out it’s a Contract Lifecycle Management platform that helps enterprise companies create and manage their legal contracts. By that definition, we were. So of course I wrote back, ‘Yes, we are definitely a CLM, we would love to come demo our CLM for you.’ But while we were really great at creating contracts with our AI legal assistant product, we hadn't put a lot of thought into how you deal with contracts afterwards, with a feature called a repository. And so we had set up this demo with the legal team from this publicly traded company, and I turned to my co-founder Cai, and said, ‘By the way, we have 3 hours to build a repository.’ We took the train from SF to San Jose and he built the first version of a repository, which we demoed live at the end of the train ride. This customer was in a CLM evaluation cycle that had 12 other solutions in it, but they loved the demo. So we went and actually built the full product, and we won. And after that, of course, we changed our messaging. We got serious about building CLM functionality and that's our flagship product to this day. There were lots of people out there trying to buy a CLM so we just got to participate in a lot of buying cycles, but with the AI legal assistant buying cycle, we had to create every one of those.” 👥 Artificially constrain the buyer and build community early “One of the things that we did which was really helpful in hindsight was we artificially constrained the buyer we were going after. Once we decided to make the shift to enterprise, instead of trying to address the whole US market or the whole global market, we decided we only cared about being the number one CLM in SoMa. We got a list of every company that could use the CLM in SoMa and got intros to them — it just provided a ton of focus for us. It's how we also stumbled into doing community. We would host these community dinners and if you were a general counsel of a company based in SoMa, you probably knew other people that were coming to them. We just started to get this buzz of ‘Are you going to the Ironclad thing tonight?’ There's a ton of value if you can discover a part of the organization that no one cares about, and connect that part of the organization to a larger business problem.” 📚 Founder-led sales is learnable I was impressed to learn that Jason still sends cold outreach himself to this day. But founder-led sales didn’t come naturally. “A misconception I had about early-stage startups was that the cartoon character salesperson who's slapping everyone on the back and is a total extrovert is the best salesperson. And it's actually the person who's almost like an engineer in their mindset — super methodical, sends great follow ups, could be very shy. It's a very learnable skill.”

Todd Jackson

50,683 views • 2 years ago

Chamath: AI advantage may come less from models than from private inputs. "When labs can build similar models, the real win comes from one unique ingredient in order to monetize it well. Here is a basic thing about machine learning that is worth knowing: if you take 1,000 of the same inputs and give them to Facebook, Microsoft, Google, and Amazon, they will all come up with the same machine learning model. But if you have one extra thing, one little ingredient that all of those other companies do not have, your output can be markedly different. It is like giving two great chefs three ingredients, but giving the third chef one extra ingredient. That person has the ability to do something very special. Right now, we are in a world where everybody is crawling the open web. We are going to move to a world where, as everybody gets sophisticated enough and information is widely available, somebody is going to say, “You know what? This site, I am not going to allow anybody else to access. It is only for me, only for my models.” Those models will become better. So we have to let that play out a little bit. It is going to be a really interesting arms race. The next wave of M&A, for example, could be companies like Google, Microsoft, and Facebook looking at these companies and saying, “Can they be viable inputs to my large language models or to my other machine learning and AI models?” --- A company with unique workflows, transactions, medical records, industrial logs, legal archives, design files, or user behavior can turn boring private data into a compounding advantage. Some startups may never become great public companies on their own, yet still become valuable because they own a data stream that makes a larger AI system sharper, more differentiated, or harder to copy. That turns acquisition strategy upside down: the buyer may not be purchasing revenue, brand, or even software, but a private ingredient for intelligence. ---- From "iConnections" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

143,134 views • 2 months ago

Here is Robert De Niro’s full statement about how Donald Trump should NEVER be president again: “I’ve spent a lot of time studying bad men. I’ve examined their characteristics, their mannerisms, the utter banality of their cruelty. Yet there’s something different about Donald Trump. When I look at him, I don’t see a bad man. Truly. I see an evil one. Over the years, I’ve met gangsters here and there. This guy tries to be one, but he can’t quite pull it off. There’s such a thing as “honor among thieves.” Yes, even criminals usually have a sense of right and wrong. Whether they do the right thing or not is a different story — but — they have a moral code, however warped. Donald Trump does not. He’s a wannabe tough guy with no morals or ethics. No sense of right or wrong. No regard for anyone but himself — not the people he was supposed to lead and protect, not the people he does business with, not the people who follow him, blindly and loyally, not even the people who consider themselves his “friends.” He has contempt for all of them. We New Yorkers got to know him over the years that he poisoned the atmosphere and littered our city with monuments to his ego. We knew first hand that this was someone who should never be considered for leadership. We tried to warn the world in 2016. The repercussions of his turbulent presidency divided America and rattled New York City beyond imagination. Remember how we were jolted by crisis in early 2020, as a virus swept the world. We lived with Donald Trump’s bombastic behavior every day on the national stage, and we suffered as we saw our neighbors piling up in body bags. The man who was supposed to protect this country put it in peril, because of his recklessness and impulsiveness. It was like an abusive father ruling the family by fear and violent behavior. That was the consequence of New York’s warning getting ignored. Next time, we know it will be worse. Make no mistake: the twice-impeached, 4-time indicted Donald Trump is still a fool. But we can’t let our fellow Americans write him off like one. Evil thrives in the shadow of dismissive mockery, which is why we must take the danger of Donald Trump very seriously. So today we issue another warning. From this place where Abraham Lincoln spoke — right here in the beating heart of New York — to the rest of America: This is our last chance. Democracy won’t survive the return of a wannabe dictator. And it won’t overcome evil if we are divided. So what do we do about it? I know I’m preaching to the choir here. What we’re doing today is valuable, but we have to take today into tomorrow – take it outside these walls. We have to reach out to the half of our country who have ignored the hazards of Trump and, for whatever reason, support elevating him back into the White House. They’re not stupid, and we must not condemn them for making a stupid choice. Our future doesn’t just depend on us. It depends on them. Let’s reach out to Trump’s followers with respect. Let’s not talk about “democracy.” “Democracy” may be our holy grail, but to others it is just a word, a concept, and in their embrace of Trump, they’ve already turned their backs on it. Let’s talk about right and wrong. Let’s talk about humanity. Let’s talk about kindness. Security for our world. Safety for our families. Decency. Let’s welcome them back. We won’t get them all, but we can get enough to end the nightmare of Trump, and fulfill the mission of this “Stop Trump Summit.”

Here is Robert De Niro’s full statement about how Donald Trump should NEVER be president again: “I’ve spent a lot of time studying bad men. I’ve examined their characteristics, their mannerisms, the utter banality of their cruelty. Yet there’s something different about Donald Trump. When I look at him, I don’t see a bad man. Truly. I see an evil one. Over the years, I’ve met gangsters here and there. This guy tries to be one, but he can’t quite pull it off. There’s such a thing as “honor among thieves.” Yes, even criminals usually have a sense of right and wrong. Whether they do the right thing or not is a different story — but — they have a moral code, however warped. Donald Trump does not. He’s a wannabe tough guy with no morals or ethics. No sense of right or wrong. No regard for anyone but himself — not the people he was supposed to lead and protect, not the people he does business with, not the people who follow him, blindly and loyally, not even the people who consider themselves his “friends.” He has contempt for all of them. We New Yorkers got to know him over the years that he poisoned the atmosphere and littered our city with monuments to his ego. We knew first hand that this was someone who should never be considered for leadership. We tried to warn the world in 2016. The repercussions of his turbulent presidency divided America and rattled New York City beyond imagination. Remember how we were jolted by crisis in early 2020, as a virus swept the world. We lived with Donald Trump’s bombastic behavior every day on the national stage, and we suffered as we saw our neighbors piling up in body bags. The man who was supposed to protect this country put it in peril, because of his recklessness and impulsiveness. It was like an abusive father ruling the family by fear and violent behavior. That was the consequence of New York’s warning getting ignored. Next time, we know it will be worse. Make no mistake: the twice-impeached, 4-time indicted Donald Trump is still a fool. But we can’t let our fellow Americans write him off like one. Evil thrives in the shadow of dismissive mockery, which is why we must take the danger of Donald Trump very seriously. So today we issue another warning. From this place where Abraham Lincoln spoke — right here in the beating heart of New York — to the rest of America: This is our last chance. Democracy won’t survive the return of a wannabe dictator. And it won’t overcome evil if we are divided. So what do we do about it? I know I’m preaching to the choir here. What we’re doing today is valuable, but we have to take today into tomorrow – take it outside these walls. We have to reach out to the half of our country who have ignored the hazards of Trump and, for whatever reason, support elevating him back into the White House. They’re not stupid, and we must not condemn them for making a stupid choice. Our future doesn’t just depend on us. It depends on them. Let’s reach out to Trump’s followers with respect. Let’s not talk about “democracy.” “Democracy” may be our holy grail, but to others it is just a word, a concept, and in their embrace of Trump, they’ve already turned their backs on it. Let’s talk about right and wrong. Let’s talk about humanity. Let’s talk about kindness. Security for our world. Safety for our families. Decency. Let’s welcome them back. We won’t get them all, but we can get enough to end the nightmare of Trump, and fulfill the mission of this “Stop Trump Summit.”

CALL TO ACTIVISM

7,458,821 views • 2 years ago

"Mark Carney didn’t misspeak. He didn’t stumble over words. He stood in China and very deliberately said that Canada’s partnership with the CCP “sets us up well for the new world order.” That phrase isn’t accidental. It’s not poetic fluff. It’s a term that’s been whispered behind closed doors for decades... dismissed as conspiracy theory every time regular people noticed global institutions consolidating power, erasing borders, side-lining national sovereignty, and replacing voters with technocrats. And now we have a Prime Minister saying it out loud, on foreign soil, next to an authoritarian regime. When people warned about a *new world order,* this is exactly what they meant... unelected elites reshaping global power structures while pretending it’s progress. When Carney says the world has changed, what he means is that democratic consent is now an inconvenience. When he says partnership, what he means is alignment. And when he says new world order, he’s not talking about prosperity for Canadians... he’s talking about a system where decisions are made above your head and far away from your vote. If this were anyone else saying it, the media would be in a full-blown meltdown. But because it’s said calmly, in a suit, with banker confidence, we’re supposed to nod along and trust the process. No questions. No scepticism. No alarms. People were mocked for years for warning this moment was coming. And now it’s here... not whispered, not leaked... but openly declared. That should terrify every Canadian who still believes this country belongs to its citizens, not a *new order* designed without them."

"Mark Carney didn’t misspeak. He didn’t stumble over words. He stood in China and very deliberately said that Canada’s partnership with the CCP “sets us up well for the new world order.” That phrase isn’t accidental. It’s not poetic fluff. It’s a term that’s been whispered behind closed doors for decades... dismissed as conspiracy theory every time regular people noticed global institutions consolidating power, erasing borders, side-lining national sovereignty, and replacing voters with technocrats. And now we have a Prime Minister saying it out loud, on foreign soil, next to an authoritarian regime. When people warned about a new world order, this is exactly what they meant... unelected elites reshaping global power structures while pretending it’s progress. When Carney says the world has changed, what he means is that democratic consent is now an inconvenience. When he says partnership, what he means is alignment. And when he says new world order, he’s not talking about prosperity for Canadians... he’s talking about a system where decisions are made above your head and far away from your vote. If this were anyone else saying it, the media would be in a full-blown meltdown. But because it’s said calmly, in a suit, with banker confidence, we’re supposed to nod along and trust the process. No questions. No scepticism. No alarms. People were mocked for years for warning this moment was coming. And now it’s here... not whispered, not leaked... but openly declared. That should terrify every Canadian who still believes this country belongs to its citizens, not a new order designed without them."

Ivor Cummins

65,411 views • 6 months ago

“Here we are, six years after the coronavirus outbreak, and we still don’t know for sure how it started. Which is kind of important, because if we don’t know how it started, we can’t really know how to prevent the next one. And for a lot of reasons, that issue got completely politicized over the last six years. And this hearing didn’t help in that regard. It’s Kabuki. It’s a show. On both sides, actually… It’s a lot of heat and no light.” “When it comes to Fauci, in any normal situation, you could say, well, if he’s got nothing to hide, he could just talk. But we’re not in a normal environment. We’re in an environment where the Justice Department indicted Comey for an Instagram post on the beach. Fauci has a pardon, it’s not a future pardon. He doesn’t have immunity. If Rand Paul really wanted answers, he could give him immunity, but he didn’t do that. So, knowing that he could be indicted for almost anything in this era, I completely understand why he took the fifth.” “There’s a lot of evidence that Fauci seriously considered the lab leak theory, in private. But he and his friends, in public, always poo-pooed it and talked it down… There’s a ton of U.S. government information that we still have not seen. And that’s the information that led the FBI, the Department of Energy, and more recently the CIA to conclude that there’s a preponderance of evidence, not proof, but more evidence than not that the bat coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan was somehow related to the bat coronavirus labs in Wuhan.” “There’s a lot of research that American and Chinese researchers were doing in Wuhan on making bat coronaviruses more dangerous. You can call it Gain of Function or not, it doesn’t matter what you call it… The idea was to figure out how viruses might evolve so that we could prevent them. But if the viruses broke out of the lab, then we actually caused the pandemic, which is a tough thing to wrap your head around.” “This was government-sponsored research by scientists in America and China who were trying to do the right thing. They weren’t trying to start a pandemic. But they may have started a pandemic. And the fact that this is politicized means we can’t get to those answers. But those answers are still there. Something happened in Wuhan. We need to figure out what it was, so we can prevent the next pandemic.” Watch my entire segment about the Rand-Fauci hearing battle with Boris Sanchez on CNN News Central.

“Here we are, six years after the coronavirus outbreak, and we still don’t know for sure how it started. Which is kind of important, because if we don’t know how it started, we can’t really know how to prevent the next one. And for a lot of reasons, that issue got completely politicized over the last six years. And this hearing didn’t help in that regard. It’s Kabuki. It’s a show. On both sides, actually… It’s a lot of heat and no light.” “When it comes to Fauci, in any normal situation, you could say, well, if he’s got nothing to hide, he could just talk. But we’re not in a normal environment. We’re in an environment where the Justice Department indicted Comey for an Instagram post on the beach. Fauci has a pardon, it’s not a future pardon. He doesn’t have immunity. If Rand Paul really wanted answers, he could give him immunity, but he didn’t do that. So, knowing that he could be indicted for almost anything in this era, I completely understand why he took the fifth.” “There’s a lot of evidence that Fauci seriously considered the lab leak theory, in private. But he and his friends, in public, always poo-pooed it and talked it down… There’s a ton of U.S. government information that we still have not seen. And that’s the information that led the FBI, the Department of Energy, and more recently the CIA to conclude that there’s a preponderance of evidence, not proof, but more evidence than not that the bat coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan was somehow related to the bat coronavirus labs in Wuhan.” “There’s a lot of research that American and Chinese researchers were doing in Wuhan on making bat coronaviruses more dangerous. You can call it Gain of Function or not, it doesn’t matter what you call it… The idea was to figure out how viruses might evolve so that we could prevent them. But if the viruses broke out of the lab, then we actually caused the pandemic, which is a tough thing to wrap your head around.” “This was government-sponsored research by scientists in America and China who were trying to do the right thing. They weren’t trying to start a pandemic. But they may have started a pandemic. And the fact that this is politicized means we can’t get to those answers. But those answers are still there. Something happened in Wuhan. We need to figure out what it was, so we can prevent the next pandemic.” Watch my entire segment about the Rand-Fauci hearing battle with Boris Sanchez on CNN News Central.

Josh Rogin

62,795 views • 6 days ago

EPSTEIN OBSESSED WITH ANTIGRAVITY TECH as Eric Weinstein blows the lid off of Epstein's secret connections to the scientific community and questions who and what Epstein and the elite were really up to. Weinstein claims that Epstein knew all about his research about antigravity technology without even telling him. How much deeper and darker does this go? We also know for a fact that Epstein had access and connections to all the leading scientists in the world and was conducting bizarre research and buying woman's eggs and God only knows what else. Epstein was also obsessed with eugenics and transhumanism and wanted to literally seed the human race and create a super human species. Epstein himself, in a New York Times article, talked about a baby factory and wanted to impregnate multiple women at his alleged underground lab location at his New Mexico, Zorro Ranch. Over $21 trillion dollars has gone missing over the years and some of the most connected people are claiming that a group of wealthy elites are conducting classified and secret research with advanced technology and have also built enormous military D.U.M.B.s all across the world, especially right here in the U.S. There was also a video from a NASA space shuttle that allegedly filmed something rising form the area of Epstein's Little St. James Island out into the atmosphere at extremely high velocity. From child trafficking, Satanic rituals, human sacrifice, transhumanism, and seeding the human race, to an obsession with science, antigravity technology, including being accused of hiding scientific knowledge and breakthroughs from the public, anything is possible. Why was Epstein obsessed with antigravity technology? Did they crack the code and have research privy that nobody else was aware of? Were they working on things in secret? Does this have anything to do with human trafficking or abductions? With his intelligence connections, secret locations and the amount of scientists and witness testimonies over the years. I wouldn't put anything past any of the wealthy elite and what they're really up to. Let's just say this goes so much deeper and darker and should signal to you as to why all of this stuff is coming out at the same time. Pay attention. They are hiding scientific findings, physics, and many other important things from us. This is a lot darker and bigger than anyone saw coming. But the question still remains, what was Epstein and this group of wealthy Satanic elite really up to?

EPSTEIN OBSESSED WITH ANTIGRAVITY TECH as Eric Weinstein blows the lid off of Epstein's secret connections to the scientific community and questions who and what Epstein and the elite were really up to. Weinstein claims that Epstein knew all about his research about antigravity technology without even telling him. How much deeper and darker does this go? We also know for a fact that Epstein had access and connections to all the leading scientists in the world and was conducting bizarre research and buying woman's eggs and God only knows what else. Epstein was also obsessed with eugenics and transhumanism and wanted to literally seed the human race and create a super human species. Epstein himself, in a New York Times article, talked about a baby factory and wanted to impregnate multiple women at his alleged underground lab location at his New Mexico, Zorro Ranch. Over $21 trillion dollars has gone missing over the years and some of the most connected people are claiming that a group of wealthy elites are conducting classified and secret research with advanced technology and have also built enormous military D.U.M.B.s all across the world, especially right here in the U.S. There was also a video from a NASA space shuttle that allegedly filmed something rising form the area of Epstein's Little St. James Island out into the atmosphere at extremely high velocity. From child trafficking, Satanic rituals, human sacrifice, transhumanism, and seeding the human race, to an obsession with science, antigravity technology, including being accused of hiding scientific knowledge and breakthroughs from the public, anything is possible. Why was Epstein obsessed with antigravity technology? Did they crack the code and have research privy that nobody else was aware of? Were they working on things in secret? Does this have anything to do with human trafficking or abductions? With his intelligence connections, secret locations and the amount of scientists and witness testimonies over the years. I wouldn't put anything past any of the wealthy elite and what they're really up to. Let's just say this goes so much deeper and darker and should signal to you as to why all of this stuff is coming out at the same time. Pay attention. They are hiding scientific findings, physics, and many other important things from us. This is a lot darker and bigger than anyone saw coming. But the question still remains, what was Epstein and this group of wealthy Satanic elite really up to?

The SCIF

36,961 views • 1 year ago