Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINA TESTS SHAPE-SHIFTING HYPERSONIC RAMJET ENGINE China has pulled off a major hypersonic breakthrough by ground-testing a variable-geometry Ramjet that reshapes its own internal airflow channel in flight — much like a throat tightening and relaxing — and runs continuously from Mach 1.8 all the... way to Mach 6 without leaking superheated gases or needing a heavy rocket booster to get started. 🔸 Chinese engineers solved the decades-old problem of creating reliable airtight seals for moving parts inside variable-geometry Ramjets, a challenge that caused severe gas leaks at extreme heat and speed and led most countries to abandon the design entirely. 🔸 The engine’s combustion chamber throat adjusted itself in just one-third of a second while inhaling gases at 1,650 degrees Celsius, delivering stable performance across a wide speed range that previously required separate boosters and added cost and complexity. 🔸 The graphite seal used in the Chinese breakthrough is the same one the US defense industry desperately needs. The US defense industry, now faces vulnerabilities in its graphite supply chains – material critical for missile nose tips, rocket nozzles, stealth coatings, and nuclear reactor components. 🔸 China produces nearly 80 percent of the world’s graphite, including the high-purity grades needed for aerospace, and restricted exports of the material to the United States starting in late 2024. 🔸 Washington has invoked the Defense Production Act to fund domestic and allied graphite mining while Europe pushes similar efforts under its Critical Raw Materials Act, yet building new supply chains from scratch is expected to take a decade or more. Do you think U.S. engines can catch up with Chinese technology?show more

NewRulesGeopolitics

93,737 subscribers

80,264 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

America imports 100% of its natural graphite. Titan Mining is changing that as the first end-to-end natural flake graphite producer in the U.S. in 70+ years. As America accelerates efforts to secure domestic supply chains for critical minerals, Titan Mining Corporation is changing that as the first end-to-end natural flake graphite producer in the U.S. in 70+ years. Fourth-largest zinc producer in the United States. Expanding into graphite and germanium. With operations in upstate New York, Titan is building a critical minerals hub focused on materials essential to: - Defense & communications systems - Batteries & energy storage - AI & semiconductors Now scaling toward: • ~40,000 tonnes of graphite production capacity • Supplying ~50% of U.S. domestic graphite demand • Recovering germanium from existing zinc streams • Advancing projects backed by U.S. government support Critical minerals are no longer just commodities - they’re strategic assets. Watch the full feature on BTV. Learn More:

America imports 100% of its natural graphite. Titan Mining is changing that as the first end-to-end natural flake graphite producer in the U.S. in 70+ years. As America accelerates efforts to secure domestic supply chains for critical minerals, Titan Mining Corporation is changing that as the first end-to-end natural flake graphite producer in the U.S. in 70+ years. Fourth-largest zinc producer in the United States. Expanding into graphite and germanium. With operations in upstate New York, Titan is building a critical minerals hub focused on materials essential to: - Defense & communications systems - Batteries & energy storage - AI & semiconductors Now scaling toward: • ~40,000 tonnes of graphite production capacity • Supplying ~50% of U.S. domestic graphite demand • Recovering germanium from existing zinc streams • Advancing projects backed by U.S. government support Critical minerals are no longer just commodities - they’re strategic assets. Watch the full feature on BTV. Learn More:

BTV & CEO Clips

51,491 views • 2 months ago

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINA DEPLOYS NEW DEFENSE SYSTEMS MAKING U.S. & TAIWAN'S MISSILES OBSOLETE As Washington sells HIMARS rockets and ATACMS ballistic missiles to Taiwan and stations US personnel permanently in Taipei’s new Joint Firepower Coordination Centre, the Chinese Army in Fujian province is now fully re-equipped with the upgraded HQ-16F long-range air defense system. 🔸 The new HQ-16F delivers a massive 160KM RANGE — more than double the 40-70km of earlier variants and the first true long-range system in the family. 🔸 Its slimmer near-tailless missiles, AESA radar, and advanced inertial + active/semi-active guidance provide superior anti-jamming and anti-saturation performance. 🔸 The upgrade arrives exactly as the U.S. considers deploying ATACMS just 16KM from the Chinese mainland coast. 🔸 It slots perfectly into Beijing’s world-class multi-layered missile shield, anchored by the new mobile HQ-29 ICBM interceptor. Do you think Taiwan and the U.S. can cope with China's defense systems?

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINA DEPLOYS NEW DEFENSE SYSTEMS MAKING U.S. & TAIWAN'S MISSILES OBSOLETE As Washington sells HIMARS rockets and ATACMS ballistic missiles to Taiwan and stations US personnel permanently in Taipei’s new Joint Firepower Coordination Centre, the Chinese Army in Fujian province is now fully re-equipped with the upgraded HQ-16F long-range air defense system. 🔸 The new HQ-16F delivers a massive 160KM RANGE — more than double the 40-70km of earlier variants and the first true long-range system in the family. 🔸 Its slimmer near-tailless missiles, AESA radar, and advanced inertial + active/semi-active guidance provide superior anti-jamming and anti-saturation performance. 🔸 The upgrade arrives exactly as the U.S. considers deploying ATACMS just 16KM from the Chinese mainland coast. 🔸 It slots perfectly into Beijing’s world-class multi-layered missile shield, anchored by the new mobile HQ-29 ICBM interceptor. Do you think Taiwan and the U.S. can cope with China's defense systems?

NewRulesGeopolitics

15,017 views • 3 months ago

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. NAVY IN PANIC: CHINA ARMS ITS MAIN DESTROYER CLASS WITH YJ-20 HYPERSONIC MISSILES New PLA footage has shown a Type 052D destroyer launching the YJ-20 hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missile for the first time publicly. Previously demonstrated aboard the larger Type 055, the weapon has now reached the class that forms the backbone of China’s surface fleet. 🔸 The YJ-20 is a boost-glide weapon capable of speeds above Mach 5, with its range estimated at up to 1,500 km. Its manoeuvring bi-conic glide body can strike ships at a steep, near-vertical angle, making interception far more difficult. 🔸 The missile was cold-launched from one of the Type 052D’s 64 universal vertical-launch cells, ejecting above the ship before its motor ignited. 🔸 More than 35 Type 052Ds are already in service, with additional ships under construction. Unlike the smaller Type 055 fleet, these destroyers are produced in large numbers and routinely operate across the South China Sea and Western Pacific. 🔸 The YJ-20 does not need to replace the YJ-18. A mixed load allows Chinese destroyers to combine long-range hypersonic attacks with sea-skimming cruise missiles, forcing carrier defenses to confront different speeds, trajectories and approach angles. 🔸 This is what makes the integration more important than a single launch. Hypersonic anti-ship firepower can now spread beyond China’s largest destroyers to a far more numerous class, creating more launch platforms and attack directions. 🔸 The Pentagon’s leaked Overmatch brief found that American warships such as the Gerald R. Ford were often destroyed in Taiwan war games. Giving China’s primary destroyer class a hypersonic carrier-killer makes those scenarios even harder for the U.S. Navy. The threat is no longer one rare missile aboard a handful of large warships. It is China’s mass-produced destroyer fleet gaining the ability to attack U.S. carrier groups from extreme range. What threatens U.S. carriers more: the YJ-20’s speed or the number of ships that can launch it?

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. NAVY IN PANIC: CHINA ARMS ITS MAIN DESTROYER CLASS WITH YJ-20 HYPERSONIC MISSILES New PLA footage has shown a Type 052D destroyer launching the YJ-20 hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missile for the first time publicly. Previously demonstrated aboard the larger Type 055, the weapon has now reached the class that forms the backbone of China’s surface fleet. 🔸 The YJ-20 is a boost-glide weapon capable of speeds above Mach 5, with its range estimated at up to 1,500 km. Its manoeuvring bi-conic glide body can strike ships at a steep, near-vertical angle, making interception far more difficult. 🔸 The missile was cold-launched from one of the Type 052D’s 64 universal vertical-launch cells, ejecting above the ship before its motor ignited. 🔸 More than 35 Type 052Ds are already in service, with additional ships under construction. Unlike the smaller Type 055 fleet, these destroyers are produced in large numbers and routinely operate across the South China Sea and Western Pacific. 🔸 The YJ-20 does not need to replace the YJ-18. A mixed load allows Chinese destroyers to combine long-range hypersonic attacks with sea-skimming cruise missiles, forcing carrier defenses to confront different speeds, trajectories and approach angles. 🔸 This is what makes the integration more important than a single launch. Hypersonic anti-ship firepower can now spread beyond China’s largest destroyers to a far more numerous class, creating more launch platforms and attack directions. 🔸 The Pentagon’s leaked Overmatch brief found that American warships such as the Gerald R. Ford were often destroyed in Taiwan war games. Giving China’s primary destroyer class a hypersonic carrier-killer makes those scenarios even harder for the U.S. Navy. The threat is no longer one rare missile aboard a handful of large warships. It is China’s mass-produced destroyer fleet gaining the ability to attack U.S. carrier groups from extreme range. What threatens U.S. carriers more: the YJ-20’s speed or the number of ships that can launch it?

NewRulesGeopolitics

15,627 views • 26 days ago

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. IN PANIC: CHINA MADE ROCKET-POWERED DRONE TO SPOT AMERICAN CARRIERS FROM 60,000 FEET China is building an automated network of drones and sensors at an industrial scale — something the U.S. has never encountered. Chinese WZ-7 Soaring Dragon drone can locate an aircraft carrier from 60,000 feet up and send its coordinates directly to a missile. 🔸 The WZ-7 Soaring Dragon feeds targeting data directly to DF-21D and DF-26 anti-ship missiles. 🔸 The Atlas Swarm-2, a truck-mounted launcher, can fire 48 drones in three-second intervals, creating a 96-drone swarm that communicates in real time. Onboard AI handles terrain recognition and autonomous routing. 🔸 China's Jiu Tian SS-UAV drone mothership has a 25-meter wingspan and carries between 100 and 150 sub-drones. 🔸 The WZ-8 Hypersonic Ghost reconnaissance drone is rocket-powered and reaches Mach 3 at 100,000 feet. 🔸 China's approach to warfare focuses on intelligentized warfare — algorithm-driven combat, autonomous networks, and industrial scale. The goal is to make decisions at machine speed using networked sensors and algorithm-assisted targeting. This drone ecosystem would severely complicate the traditional U.S. carrier strategy, which relies on launching aircraft to establish air superiority in the area. Do you think that U.S. Carriers can survive coordinated Chinese attack?

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 U.S. IN PANIC: CHINA MADE ROCKET-POWERED DRONE TO SPOT AMERICAN CARRIERS FROM 60,000 FEET China is building an automated network of drones and sensors at an industrial scale — something the U.S. has never encountered. Chinese WZ-7 Soaring Dragon drone can locate an aircraft carrier from 60,000 feet up and send its coordinates directly to a missile. 🔸 The WZ-7 Soaring Dragon feeds targeting data directly to DF-21D and DF-26 anti-ship missiles. 🔸 The Atlas Swarm-2, a truck-mounted launcher, can fire 48 drones in three-second intervals, creating a 96-drone swarm that communicates in real time. Onboard AI handles terrain recognition and autonomous routing. 🔸 China's Jiu Tian SS-UAV drone mothership has a 25-meter wingspan and carries between 100 and 150 sub-drones. 🔸 The WZ-8 Hypersonic Ghost reconnaissance drone is rocket-powered and reaches Mach 3 at 100,000 feet. 🔸 China's approach to warfare focuses on intelligentized warfare — algorithm-driven combat, autonomous networks, and industrial scale. The goal is to make decisions at machine speed using networked sensors and algorithm-assisted targeting. This drone ecosystem would severely complicate the traditional U.S. carrier strategy, which relies on launching aircraft to establish air superiority in the area. Do you think that U.S. Carriers can survive coordinated Chinese attack?

NewRulesGeopolitics

14,925 views • 3 months ago

$🚨🇨🇳 GAME OVER FOR U.S. NAVY: CHINA’S RAILGUN NOW HAS WORKING GUIDANCE SYSTEM For decades the problem inside an electromagnetic rail gun was simple: any guidance chip would be crushed by 20,000g forces and fried by a 7-tesla magnetic storm before it could steer. China just proved that barrier has been shattered. 🔸 Chinese prototype survived 20,000g overload and 7T magnetic pulse in a real rail gun firing test — first open-source proof that a full guidance system endured the launch. 🔸 Multi-layer protective cocoon (copper, iron, polyurethane impedance layers & mu-metal) was optimized via NSGA-II genetic algorithm, delivering a 71.4% shielding boost. 🔸 US Navy already shelved its naval rail gun after failing to crack guidance survival; Japan’s version remains small-calibre and limited to short-range defense. 🔸 Built-in “brain” now enables cheap hypersonic rounds to self-correct mid-flight and strike moving targets hundreds of km away at a fraction of missile cost. 🔸 Taiyuan team’s breakthrough shifts rail guns from lab curiosities toward potential war-winners — though ship power, sustained fire rates and full-range performance remain unproven. Do you think the U.S. could catch up to China's technology? Follow to keep up with the latest military and technological trends.$

🚨🇨🇳 GAME OVER FOR U.S. NAVY: CHINA’S RAILGUN NOW HAS WORKING GUIDANCE SYSTEM For decades the problem inside an electromagnetic rail gun was simple: any guidance chip would be crushed by 20,000g forces and fried by a 7-tesla magnetic storm before it could steer. China just proved that barrier has been shattered. 🔸 Chinese prototype survived 20,000g overload and 7T magnetic pulse in a real rail gun firing test — first open-source proof that a full guidance system endured the launch. 🔸 Multi-layer protective cocoon (copper, iron, polyurethane impedance layers & mu-metal) was optimized via NSGA-II genetic algorithm, delivering a 71.4% shielding boost. 🔸 US Navy already shelved its naval rail gun after failing to crack guidance survival; Japan’s version remains small-calibre and limited to short-range defense. 🔸 Built-in “brain” now enables cheap hypersonic rounds to self-correct mid-flight and strike moving targets hundreds of km away at a fraction of missile cost. 🔸 Taiyuan team’s breakthrough shifts rail guns from lab curiosities toward potential war-winners — though ship power, sustained fire rates and full-range performance remain unproven. Do you think the U.S. could catch up to China's technology? Follow to keep up with the latest military and technological trends.

NewRulesGeopolitics

16,467 views • 2 months ago

🚨🇨🇳 WEST IN PANIC: CHINA JOINS ELITE CLUB IN ADVANCED TURBINE BLADE TECHNOLOGY If the aero-engine is the pearl of modern industry, the single-crystal turbine blade is the diamond atop it. China has now mastered the complete technology chain — from materials, Research and Development, and precision casting to full engineering application — joining just 5 nations total: US, UK, Russia, France, and now China. 🔸 China’s DD6 single-crystal superalloy features 100% domestic IP and matches or exceeds 2nd-generation Western alloys while delivering significantly lower production costs. 🔸 These blades now power advanced fighter jets, helicopters, and civil aircraft, providing higher thrust, lower fuel consumption, and superior performance under extreme temperatures and pressure. 🔸 The full manufacturing chain spans over 10 major core processes — each with dozens of precise sub-steps — all now fully indigenous after closing decades of technological gaps. 🔸 This breakthrough saves China massive strategic resources and establishes new benchmarks for engine reliability and service life. Do you think the West can stop China's technological progress?

🚨🇨🇳 WEST IN PANIC: CHINA JOINS ELITE CLUB IN ADVANCED TURBINE BLADE TECHNOLOGY If the aero-engine is the pearl of modern industry, the single-crystal turbine blade is the diamond atop it. China has now mastered the complete technology chain — from materials, Research and Development, and precision casting to full engineering application — joining just 5 nations total: US, UK, Russia, France, and now China. 🔸 China’s DD6 single-crystal superalloy features 100% domestic IP and matches or exceeds 2nd-generation Western alloys while delivering significantly lower production costs. 🔸 These blades now power advanced fighter jets, helicopters, and civil aircraft, providing higher thrust, lower fuel consumption, and superior performance under extreme temperatures and pressure. 🔸 The full manufacturing chain spans over 10 major core processes — each with dozens of precise sub-steps — all now fully indigenous after closing decades of technological gaps. 🔸 This breakthrough saves China massive strategic resources and establishes new benchmarks for engine reliability and service life. Do you think the West can stop China's technological progress?

NewRulesGeopolitics

15,507 views • 3 months ago

🚨🇨🇳 China's indigenous Fujian carrier to enter service as world's first with anti-torpedo system - report The system replaces traditional depth charge launchers with six-tube torpedoes and will be able to deliver a hard-kill capability, Chinese media reports. 🔸 Blazing acceleration to 50-60 knots in 3 seconds with quiet rocket and pump-jet propulsion 🔸 Extreme maneuverability for tracking fast, evasive torpedoes like the US MK48 🔸 Advanced sonar that distinguishes real threats from decoys at long range and enables precise targeting for single-hit kills 🔸 Two-way acoustic сommunication system for reliable networking of multiple interceptors By hardening its carriers against submarine attacks, China is accelerating its challenge to US naval supremacy in Asia, signaling a major shift in the regional balance of power.

🚨🇨🇳 China's indigenous Fujian carrier to enter service as world's first with anti-torpedo system - report The system replaces traditional depth charge launchers with six-tube torpedoes and will be able to deliver a hard-kill capability, Chinese media reports. 🔸 Blazing acceleration to 50-60 knots in 3 seconds with quiet rocket and pump-jet propulsion 🔸 Extreme maneuverability for tracking fast, evasive torpedoes like the US MK48 🔸 Advanced sonar that distinguishes real threats from decoys at long range and enables precise targeting for single-hit kills 🔸 Two-way acoustic сommunication system for reliable networking of multiple interceptors By hardening its carriers against submarine attacks, China is accelerating its challenge to US naval supremacy in Asia, signaling a major shift in the regional balance of power.

Sputnik

23,833 views • 1 month ago

🚨🇷🇺OCEANIC SHIELD: RUSSIA'S DOOMSDAY TORPEDO IS NOW AT SEA The Russian Navy has launched its most secretive and strategic submarine yet — RFS Khabarovsk — a nuclear-powered special-purpose vessel built for one mission only: to carry and deploy Poseidon (Status-6) nuclear torpedoes. What is Poseidon? 🔸A nuclear-powered, autonomous underwater torpedo 🔸Estimated range: up to 6,200 miles — intercontinental 🔸Capable of carrying a 2-megaton nuclear warhead — 100x more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb 🔸Runs at depths and speeds that make interception extremely difficult Putin himself confirmed its successful test in October 2025, calling it "a huge success" and saying "there is nothing like this” Khabarovsk — Poseidon's carrier: 🔸A nuclear-powered special-purpose submarine, quietly launched by the Russian Navy 🔸Designed to carry up to 6 Poseidon torpedoes in specialized side-mounted launch hangars 🔸Powered by a single OK-650V nuclear reactor 🔸Operates from protected bastion zones near Russian coastlines — safely out of enemy reach — while Poseidon autonomously travels to its target 🔸No countermeasure exists to intercept it Poseidon is Moscow's direct hedge against US missile defense, precision-strike capabilities, and low-yield nuclear systems that Russia views as a threat to strategic stability. Integrated with the Perimeter dead-hand system, Poseidon guarantees retaliation even if Russia's nuclear command and control is destroyed. Russia's plan, according to the US Naval Institute, calls for 30 Poseidons on 4 submarines — 2 for the Northern Fleet, 2 for the Pacific Fleet — with torpedoes in the Atlantic and Pacific capable of autonomously striking US port cities, far beyond the effective reach of any American torpedo. Multipurpose Deterrent — Poseidon is dual-capable, conventional or nuclear, and built to strike carrier battle groups, coastal fortifications, and critical infrastructure. The US has no standoff weapon to intercept Poseidon. The Navy retired Subroc in 1992 — its only long-range anti-submarine missile. Its replacement, Sea Lance, was canceled at the Cold War's end and never replaced.

🚨🇷🇺OCEANIC SHIELD: RUSSIA'S DOOMSDAY TORPEDO IS NOW AT SEA The Russian Navy has launched its most secretive and strategic submarine yet — RFS Khabarovsk — a nuclear-powered special-purpose vessel built for one mission only: to carry and deploy Poseidon (Status-6) nuclear torpedoes. What is Poseidon? 🔸A nuclear-powered, autonomous underwater torpedo 🔸Estimated range: up to 6,200 miles — intercontinental 🔸Capable of carrying a 2-megaton nuclear warhead — 100x more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb 🔸Runs at depths and speeds that make interception extremely difficult Putin himself confirmed its successful test in October 2025, calling it "a huge success" and saying "there is nothing like this” Khabarovsk — Poseidon's carrier: 🔸A nuclear-powered special-purpose submarine, quietly launched by the Russian Navy 🔸Designed to carry up to 6 Poseidon torpedoes in specialized side-mounted launch hangars 🔸Powered by a single OK-650V nuclear reactor 🔸Operates from protected bastion zones near Russian coastlines — safely out of enemy reach — while Poseidon autonomously travels to its target 🔸No countermeasure exists to intercept it Poseidon is Moscow's direct hedge against US missile defense, precision-strike capabilities, and low-yield nuclear systems that Russia views as a threat to strategic stability. Integrated with the Perimeter dead-hand system, Poseidon guarantees retaliation even if Russia's nuclear command and control is destroyed. Russia's plan, according to the US Naval Institute, calls for 30 Poseidons on 4 submarines — 2 for the Northern Fleet, 2 for the Pacific Fleet — with torpedoes in the Atlantic and Pacific capable of autonomously striking US port cities, far beyond the effective reach of any American torpedo. Multipurpose Deterrent — Poseidon is dual-capable, conventional or nuclear, and built to strike carrier battle groups, coastal fortifications, and critical infrastructure. The US has no standoff weapon to intercept Poseidon. The Navy retired Subroc in 1992 — its only long-range anti-submarine missile. Its replacement, Sea Lance, was canceled at the Cold War's end and never replaced.

NewRulesGeopolitics

56,252 views • 3 months ago

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S FIRST ZIRCON-ARMED NUCLEAR SUBMARINE IS ENTERING SERVICE Russia’s Project 885M nuclear submarine Perm is expected to complete trials and join the Navy before the end of 2026. It will be Russia’s first multipurpose nuclear submarine built from the outset to carry Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles as standard armament. 🔸 The Yasen-M combines the concealment and endurance of a nuclear-powered attack submarine with Russia’s most advanced naval strike weapons. Its arsenal includes Zircon, Kalibr and Oniks missiles for attacks against warships and targets deep inland. 🔸 The submarine has a submerged displacement of around 13,800 tonnes, reaches 31 knots underwater, can dive to 520 metres and remain at sea for up to 100 days. 🔸 Zircon reaches speeds of around Mach 9 and can strike sea and land targets at ranges exceeding 1,000 km. Its speed leaves defending forces only minutes to detect the launch, identify the target and attempt an interception. 🔸 The missile has already been successfully launched from beneath the surface, but Perm turns that tested capability into the standard armament of an operational submarine rather than a launch from an adapted trial platform. 🔸 Surface ships carrying hypersonic missiles can be tracked by satellites, aircraft and patrol vessels. A Yasen-M can remain hidden beneath the ocean, change its firing position and attack from an unexpected direction. 🔸 The same submarine can hunt carrier groups and other major warships while holding naval bases, ports, command centres and infrastructure on land at risk. Finding Perm will be NATO’s first problem. Stopping its missiles after launch will be the second — and at Mach 9, the alliance may have only minutes to solve it. Does NATO have an answer to a Mach 9 missile launched from beneath the ocean?

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S FIRST ZIRCON-ARMED NUCLEAR SUBMARINE IS ENTERING SERVICE Russia’s Project 885M nuclear submarine Perm is expected to complete trials and join the Navy before the end of 2026. It will be Russia’s first multipurpose nuclear submarine built from the outset to carry Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles as standard armament. 🔸 The Yasen-M combines the concealment and endurance of a nuclear-powered attack submarine with Russia’s most advanced naval strike weapons. Its arsenal includes Zircon, Kalibr and Oniks missiles for attacks against warships and targets deep inland. 🔸 The submarine has a submerged displacement of around 13,800 tonnes, reaches 31 knots underwater, can dive to 520 metres and remain at sea for up to 100 days. 🔸 Zircon reaches speeds of around Mach 9 and can strike sea and land targets at ranges exceeding 1,000 km. Its speed leaves defending forces only minutes to detect the launch, identify the target and attempt an interception. 🔸 The missile has already been successfully launched from beneath the surface, but Perm turns that tested capability into the standard armament of an operational submarine rather than a launch from an adapted trial platform. 🔸 Surface ships carrying hypersonic missiles can be tracked by satellites, aircraft and patrol vessels. A Yasen-M can remain hidden beneath the ocean, change its firing position and attack from an unexpected direction. 🔸 The same submarine can hunt carrier groups and other major warships while holding naval bases, ports, command centres and infrastructure on land at risk. Finding Perm will be NATO’s first problem. Stopping its missiles after launch will be the second — and at Mach 9, the alliance may have only minutes to solve it. Does NATO have an answer to a Mach 9 missile launched from beneath the ocean?

NewRulesGeopolitics

29,745 views • 26 days ago

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦 NATO'S NIGHTMARE: RUSSIA'S NEW BANDEROL MISSILE OVERWHELM UKRAINE'S FRAGILE DEFENSES Russia has intensified its attacks on Kharkov region, with at least three strikes on June 3 using Banderol “S8000” missiles— a low-cost hybrid system that Western export controls and sanctions were meant to starve but it fueled instead. 🔸 The Banderol delivers up to 500 km range with a ~150 kg warhead powered by a Chinese Swiwin SW800Pro turbojet engine — a sanction-evading standoff weapon built for mass production. 🔸 It launches primarily from the Kronshtadt Orion UAV (with adaptation for Mi-28 helicopters), using pop-out wings and superior agility compared to heavier missiles like the Kh-101 or Kalibr. 🔸 Its cheap, easy-to-manufacture design allows Russia to overwhelm air defenses while conserving expensive munitions, blurring the line between drones and cruise missiles. 🔸 The new threat forces Ukraine to adapt to tighter maneuvers and extended reach, exposing gaps in air defense coverage and the limits of Western sanctions enforcement. Do you think NATO can catch up to Russia in missile technology?

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦 NATO'S NIGHTMARE: RUSSIA'S NEW BANDEROL MISSILE OVERWHELM UKRAINE'S FRAGILE DEFENSES Russia has intensified its attacks on Kharkov region, with at least three strikes on June 3 using Banderol “S8000” missiles— a low-cost hybrid system that Western export controls and sanctions were meant to starve but it fueled instead. 🔸 The Banderol delivers up to 500 km range with a ~150 kg warhead powered by a Chinese Swiwin SW800Pro turbojet engine — a sanction-evading standoff weapon built for mass production. 🔸 It launches primarily from the Kronshtadt Orion UAV (with adaptation for Mi-28 helicopters), using pop-out wings and superior agility compared to heavier missiles like the Kh-101 or Kalibr. 🔸 Its cheap, easy-to-manufacture design allows Russia to overwhelm air defenses while conserving expensive munitions, blurring the line between drones and cruise missiles. 🔸 The new threat forces Ukraine to adapt to tighter maneuvers and extended reach, exposing gaps in air defense coverage and the limits of Western sanctions enforcement. Do you think NATO can catch up to Russia in missile technology?

NewRulesGeopolitics

30,588 views • 2 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 China's Decisive Home-Field Advantage Over the U.S. The Iran War demonstrated American military capability — but also revealed a critical vulnerability. Modern wars, even against weaker adversaries, burn through missiles at an extraordinary rate. But Iran and China are not remotely comparable. China has spent decades preparing specifically for a war against American naval power. Beijing would not rely on speedboats or mines. It would attempt a coordinated campaign designed to keep U.S. carrier strike groups far from the fight — and make intervention around Taiwan or the South China Sea costly from the opening hours of the war. 🔸 China's DF-21D "carrier killer" ballistic missile has an estimated range of 1,500 kilometers. 🔸 The longer-range DF-26 can reach much farther and threatens Guam — a critical U.S. logistics and air hub. 🔸 China would also fight with submarines, long-range bombers, drones, satellites, electronic warfare, and cyberattacks — feats Iran could not sustain. 🔸 Chinese aircraft, missile forces, and naval units would operate near home territory with shorter supply lines and land-based support. 🔸 U.S. forces would need to project power across long distances while protecting bases in Guam, Okinawa, and Japan — all of which could face missile attack in the opening phase of a war. 🔸 Logistics often decide wars. Between fuel, spare parts, runway repairs, and missile reloads, the winning side needs to perfect its ability to support its fighters and hardware at all times. The core issue is endurance. U.S. forces would be heavily dependent on scattered bases throughout the region, requiring fighter jets and bombers to travel long distances. China is built to fight close to home, while the U.S. must sustain power Meanwhile. Missile threats and logistics constraints would slow American response and strain its ability to maintain tempo. Without major adaptation, geography and preparation give Beijing a decisive edge in a prolonged conflict.

🚨🇺🇸🇨🇳 China's Decisive Home-Field Advantage Over the U.S. The Iran War demonstrated American military capability — but also revealed a critical vulnerability. Modern wars, even against weaker adversaries, burn through missiles at an extraordinary rate. But Iran and China are not remotely comparable. China has spent decades preparing specifically for a war against American naval power. Beijing would not rely on speedboats or mines. It would attempt a coordinated campaign designed to keep U.S. carrier strike groups far from the fight — and make intervention around Taiwan or the South China Sea costly from the opening hours of the war. 🔸 China's DF-21D "carrier killer" ballistic missile has an estimated range of 1,500 kilometers. 🔸 The longer-range DF-26 can reach much farther and threatens Guam — a critical U.S. logistics and air hub. 🔸 China would also fight with submarines, long-range bombers, drones, satellites, electronic warfare, and cyberattacks — feats Iran could not sustain. 🔸 Chinese aircraft, missile forces, and naval units would operate near home territory with shorter supply lines and land-based support. 🔸 U.S. forces would need to project power across long distances while protecting bases in Guam, Okinawa, and Japan — all of which could face missile attack in the opening phase of a war. 🔸 Logistics often decide wars. Between fuel, spare parts, runway repairs, and missile reloads, the winning side needs to perfect its ability to support its fighters and hardware at all times. The core issue is endurance. U.S. forces would be heavily dependent on scattered bases throughout the region, requiring fighter jets and bombers to travel long distances. China is built to fight close to home, while the U.S. must sustain power Meanwhile. Missile threats and logistics constraints would slow American response and strain its ability to maintain tempo. Without major adaptation, geography and preparation give Beijing a decisive edge in a prolonged conflict.

NewRulesGeopolitics

21,899 views • 4 months ago

🚨Victor Gao: China🇨🇳 is NOT supplying weapons to Iran, Iran is on its way to SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDING itself against the US🇺🇸 and Israel ‘China calls for an immediate end to this war, and China applauds and very much is opposed to a war of aggression. China’s support to Iran has been unequivocal, very explicit. And this is the reason why Iran has been expressing thanks to the very strong and consistent Chinese support. China, I think, believes Iran still has enough wherewithal to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. And I don’t think there has been any specific request from Iran for Chinese military help. And this is the reality. So I’m firmly opposed to any allegation that China is supplying weapons to Iran. Iran is fully capable of defending itself because it keeps demonstrating and surprising many countries by the kind of weapons, either drones or missiles, or even missiles with a range of up to 4000 kilometres and all kinds of warheads that they can carry. And I think Iran is on its way to successfully defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity, regardless of the massive amount of losses, including loss of life, that the United States and Israel have inflicted on Iran. Iran has not requested for any military aid from China, and China does not supply weapons to a country at war.’ -Victor Gao, President of the Center for China and Globalisation, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

🚨Victor Gao: China🇨🇳 is NOT supplying weapons to Iran, Iran is on its way to SUCCESSFULLY DEFENDING itself against the US🇺🇸 and Israel ‘China calls for an immediate end to this war, and China applauds and very much is opposed to a war of aggression. China’s support to Iran has been unequivocal, very explicit. And this is the reason why Iran has been expressing thanks to the very strong and consistent Chinese support. China, I think, believes Iran still has enough wherewithal to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity. And I don’t think there has been any specific request from Iran for Chinese military help. And this is the reality. So I’m firmly opposed to any allegation that China is supplying weapons to Iran. Iran is fully capable of defending itself because it keeps demonstrating and surprising many countries by the kind of weapons, either drones or missiles, or even missiles with a range of up to 4000 kilometres and all kinds of warheads that they can carry. And I think Iran is on its way to successfully defending its sovereignty and territorial integrity, regardless of the massive amount of losses, including loss of life, that the United States and Israel have inflicted on Iran. Iran has not requested for any military aid from China, and China does not supply weapons to a country at war.’ -Victor Gao, President of the Center for China and Globalisation, on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

79,149 views • 4 months ago

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINA FLIES HEAVY DRONE WITH 1,900-KM RANGE AND VERTICAL TAKEOFF China’s 1.5-tonne Qizhi-5 heavy tiltrotor UAV completed an autonomous flight test at the Chuzhou test base on August 1, performing vertical takeoff, hover, transition into forward flight, manoeuvring and landing without requiring a runway. 🔸 The aircraft is designed to combine helicopter-style access with fixed-wing performance. Its stated specifications include a top speed of 450 km/h, a 300 kg payload and a maximum range of 1,900 km. 🔸 Power comes from the domestically developed CS35 modular turboshaft engine, rated at 350 kW. Its modular architecture is intended to simplify maintenance and allow the engine to support multiple aircraft types. 🔸 The most important part of the test was the autonomous transition between vertical and forward flight. During this phase, lift shifts from the rotors to the wings while the aircraft’s aerodynamics, controls and power demands change rapidly. 🔸 Completing the full sequence demonstrated that the airframe, propulsion system and flight-control software can operate together through the aircraft’s most technically demanding flight mode. 🔸 The developers say the programme has mastered six major areas: overall configuration, transmission, rotor design, flight control, structural engineering and aeroacoustic noise reduction. 🔸 Qizhi-5 is being promoted for cargo transport, surveillance, emergency response and other low-altitude operations. The same runway-independent design also offers clear value for military logistics, reconnaissance and operations from dispersed sites. The Qizhi-5 can lift vertically from a confined area and then travel at aircraft speeds across distances normally associated with fixed-wing drones. That combination gives China access to locations where conventional UAVs still need a runway. Which Qizhi-5 advantage matters most: vertical takeoff, 300 kg payload, 450 km/h speed or 1,900 km range?

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON IN PANIC: CHINA FLIES HEAVY DRONE WITH 1,900-KM RANGE AND VERTICAL TAKEOFF China’s 1.5-tonne Qizhi-5 heavy tiltrotor UAV completed an autonomous flight test at the Chuzhou test base on August 1, performing vertical takeoff, hover, transition into forward flight, manoeuvring and landing without requiring a runway. 🔸 The aircraft is designed to combine helicopter-style access with fixed-wing performance. Its stated specifications include a top speed of 450 km/h, a 300 kg payload and a maximum range of 1,900 km. 🔸 Power comes from the domestically developed CS35 modular turboshaft engine, rated at 350 kW. Its modular architecture is intended to simplify maintenance and allow the engine to support multiple aircraft types. 🔸 The most important part of the test was the autonomous transition between vertical and forward flight. During this phase, lift shifts from the rotors to the wings while the aircraft’s aerodynamics, controls and power demands change rapidly. 🔸 Completing the full sequence demonstrated that the airframe, propulsion system and flight-control software can operate together through the aircraft’s most technically demanding flight mode. 🔸 The developers say the programme has mastered six major areas: overall configuration, transmission, rotor design, flight control, structural engineering and aeroacoustic noise reduction. 🔸 Qizhi-5 is being promoted for cargo transport, surveillance, emergency response and other low-altitude operations. The same runway-independent design also offers clear value for military logistics, reconnaissance and operations from dispersed sites. The Qizhi-5 can lift vertically from a confined area and then travel at aircraft speeds across distances normally associated with fixed-wing drones. That combination gives China access to locations where conventional UAVs still need a runway. Which Qizhi-5 advantage matters most: vertical takeoff, 300 kg payload, 450 km/h speed or 1,900 km range?

NewRulesGeopolitics

16,852 views • 22 days ago

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. IN PANIC: CHINA DEPLOYS FIRST '5+ GEN' TWIN-SEAT FIGHTER China has fielded the world’s first operational ‘5+ generation’ fighter: the twin-seat J-20S, purpose-built for airborne command and control rather than training. 🔸 The J-20S is the only twin-seat fifth-generation fighter in active service, optimized for real-time command over other J-20s and loyal wingman drones. 🔸 PLAAF brought the J-20S into operational service in July 2025, delivering the exact frontline evolution chief designer Yang Wei announced years earlier. 🔸 With a combat radius roughly twice that of the F-22 or F-35, the second crewman becomes a critical force multiplier for long-range strikes and complex drone coordination. 🔸 Following the successful J-11 to J-16 transition, analysts expect the PLAAF to shift J-20 procurement toward all-twin-seat frontline units. 🔸 While future US and Chinese sixth-gen fighters will both be twin-seaters, the current F-35 fleet remains single-seat due to its smaller airframe that cannot easily accommodate a second crewman. Do you think the West can catch up to China's jet fighters?

🚨🇨🇳 U.S. IN PANIC: CHINA DEPLOYS FIRST '5+ GEN' TWIN-SEAT FIGHTER China has fielded the world’s first operational ‘5+ generation’ fighter: the twin-seat J-20S, purpose-built for airborne command and control rather than training. 🔸 The J-20S is the only twin-seat fifth-generation fighter in active service, optimized for real-time command over other J-20s and loyal wingman drones. 🔸 PLAAF brought the J-20S into operational service in July 2025, delivering the exact frontline evolution chief designer Yang Wei announced years earlier. 🔸 With a combat radius roughly twice that of the F-22 or F-35, the second crewman becomes a critical force multiplier for long-range strikes and complex drone coordination. 🔸 Following the successful J-11 to J-16 transition, analysts expect the PLAAF to shift J-20 procurement toward all-twin-seat frontline units. 🔸 While future US and Chinese sixth-gen fighters will both be twin-seaters, the current F-35 fleet remains single-seat due to its smaller airframe that cannot easily accommodate a second crewman. Do you think the West can catch up to China's jet fighters?

NewRulesGeopolitics

17,312 views • 2 months ago

America Needs Nuclear Energy to Compete with China on e189, david friedberg did a deep dive on the current and future state of energy in the us and china: total capacity: -- today, china has ~3x electricity production capacity (~3 terawatts 🇨🇳 vs ~1 tw 🇺🇸) -- by 2050, 🇨🇳 anticipates to nearly triple capacity to 8.7 tws vs ~2 in 🇺🇸 cost: -- today, 🇨🇳 is ~3x more efficient vs 🇺🇸 -- 7-9 cents/kwh in 🇨🇳 vs 17-25 cents/kwh in 🇺🇸 -- by 2050, 🇨🇳 expects to decrease cost to ~6 cents/kwh innovation: -- 🇨🇳 just demonstrated its new pebble-bed reactor can pass a “meltdown” test -- 🇨🇳 has 26 reactors in construction with plans to add ~300 david friedberg's take: "China has more electricity production, it's cheaper to make electricity, and it's cheaper to build new capacity." "And they're building at an accelerated rate." "This is why investing in and deregulating nuclear reactor technology in the United States, to enable a competitive playing field with the US and China in the decades ahead, is so critical..." if things stay the same, 🇨🇳 china will be driven by low cost, highly abundant power. 🇺🇸 america will not.

America Needs Nuclear Energy to Compete with China on e189, david friedberg did a deep dive on the current and future state of energy in the us and china: total capacity: -- today, china has ~3x electricity production capacity (~3 terawatts 🇨🇳 vs ~1 tw 🇺🇸) -- by 2050, 🇨🇳 anticipates to nearly triple capacity to 8.7 tws vs ~2 in 🇺🇸 cost: -- today, 🇨🇳 is ~3x more efficient vs 🇺🇸 -- 7-9 cents/kwh in 🇨🇳 vs 17-25 cents/kwh in 🇺🇸 -- by 2050, 🇨🇳 expects to decrease cost to ~6 cents/kwh innovation: -- 🇨🇳 just demonstrated its new pebble-bed reactor can pass a “meltdown” test -- 🇨🇳 has 26 reactors in construction with plans to add ~300 david friedberg's take: "China has more electricity production, it's cheaper to make electricity, and it's cheaper to build new capacity." "And they're building at an accelerated rate." "This is why investing in and deregulating nuclear reactor technology in the United States, to enable a competitive playing field with the US and China in the decades ahead, is so critical..." if things stay the same, 🇨🇳 china will be driven by low cost, highly abundant power. 🇺🇸 america will not.

The All-In Podcast

68,188 views • 2 years ago

Beijing fires back with a brutal reality check after the U.S. blamed China for “late notice” on its missile test. The funniest part is that the United States actually thinks it has the moral standing to lecture China on missile tests. The U.S. is the only country that has ever used nuclear weapons. The U.S. has conducted more than 300 intercontinental ballistic missile tests in the Pacific Ocean over the years. It sits on the world’s largest and most advanced nuclear arsenal. It routinely launches strategic missile tests from nuclear submarines. But when China conducts one routine test, notified in advance and not aimed at any country, Washington suddenly becomes the priest of “standards.” The problem is not missile tests. The problem is that China is no longer asking permission to defend itself. Washington is used to being the only country allowed to point missiles at the world while calling it stability. So China tests one missile, and suddenly the arsonist wants to inspect the fire code.

Beijing fires back with a brutal reality check after the U.S. blamed China for “late notice” on its missile test. The funniest part is that the United States actually thinks it has the moral standing to lecture China on missile tests. The U.S. is the only country that has ever used nuclear weapons. The U.S. has conducted more than 300 intercontinental ballistic missile tests in the Pacific Ocean over the years. It sits on the world’s largest and most advanced nuclear arsenal. It routinely launches strategic missile tests from nuclear submarines. But when China conducts one routine test, notified in advance and not aimed at any country, Washington suddenly becomes the priest of “standards.” The problem is not missile tests. The problem is that China is no longer asking permission to defend itself. Washington is used to being the only country allowed to point missiles at the world while calling it stability. So China tests one missile, and suddenly the arsonist wants to inspect the fire code.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

72,621 views • 1 month ago

🚨🇮🇷🇨🇳 IRAN WAR JUST BLEW UP AMERICA’S CHINA WAR PLANS The short war with Iran didn’t just burn through US missiles — it proved America is nowhere near ready for a real fight with China. 🔸 MISSILE STOCKPILES GUTTED: In just the first 40 days, the US fired off huge amounts of its best air defense and attack missiles. 🔸 BASES TURNED INTO EASY TARGETS: US bases in the Middle East got hammered by Iranian drones, missiles, and jets — buildings wrecked, radars destroyed, and troops forced to work from hotels. 🔸 AIR DEFENSES FAILED HARD: Iran knocked out key US radars and ground defenses, showing they can’t protect bases even against a weaker enemy. 🔸 STAND-OFF WEAPONS DIDN’T WORK: US only destroyed about 50% of Iran’s missiles and launchers — they couldn’t stop the attacks completely. China has way more, Western sources reports. 🔸 NO REAL AIR OR SEA CONTROL: US planes still faced risks and Navy ships had to stay far away. Their blockade let many Iranian ships through. 🔸 DRONE PROBLEM EXPOSED: Iran beat the US in drone use (air and sea). America is far behind, while China is the world leader — no “hellscape” for Chinese forces. America’s whole Pacific strategy relies on these same bases, carriers, and long-range strikes… and they just failed against Iran. Do you think the U.S. stands a chance in a great power war against China?

🚨🇮🇷🇨🇳 IRAN WAR JUST BLEW UP AMERICA’S CHINA WAR PLANS The short war with Iran didn’t just burn through US missiles — it proved America is nowhere near ready for a real fight with China. 🔸 MISSILE STOCKPILES GUTTED: In just the first 40 days, the US fired off huge amounts of its best air defense and attack missiles. 🔸 BASES TURNED INTO EASY TARGETS: US bases in the Middle East got hammered by Iranian drones, missiles, and jets — buildings wrecked, radars destroyed, and troops forced to work from hotels. 🔸 AIR DEFENSES FAILED HARD: Iran knocked out key US radars and ground defenses, showing they can’t protect bases even against a weaker enemy. 🔸 STAND-OFF WEAPONS DIDN’T WORK: US only destroyed about 50% of Iran’s missiles and launchers — they couldn’t stop the attacks completely. China has way more, Western sources reports. 🔸 NO REAL AIR OR SEA CONTROL: US planes still faced risks and Navy ships had to stay far away. Their blockade let many Iranian ships through. 🔸 DRONE PROBLEM EXPOSED: Iran beat the US in drone use (air and sea). America is far behind, while China is the world leader — no “hellscape” for Chinese forces. America’s whole Pacific strategy relies on these same bases, carriers, and long-range strikes… and they just failed against Iran. Do you think the U.S. stands a chance in a great power war against China?

NewRulesGeopolitics

15,344 views • 3 months ago

🚨🇮🇷 US Nightmare: Iran's Shahab-3 missile keeps Pentagon up all night If diplomacy fails, Tehran's Shahab-3 missiles loom as the brutal reality facing Washington. 🔸 The missile can hit 1,000-2,000 km away, flies back in at MACH 7 SPEED, uses liquid fuel for quick strikes on nearby enemies 🔸 The Shahab-3 guides itself with basic tech, hits within 2,500 meters, new upgrades slip past defenses, reports hint at chemical or bio warheads in 2025 🔸 Under 50 mobile launchers ready to roll, hidden sites protect them, output ramps to 70 a year for steady buildup 🔸 The missile already has some improvements, such as the conical tip of the Shahab-3B, which reduces the payload to 700 kg to improve its maneuverability, cluster bombs (5 of 280 kg each) that increase damage, and later missiles such as the Emad and Ghadr, which achieve greater accuracy (with a margin of error of 30-50 m) at a distance of 1,700-1,950 km. 🔸 Tests in the Gulf challenge US ships, space launches conceal long-range missile development, and nuclear overtures weaken US control in a changing world. Iran already penetrated the combined defenses of the US and Israel in 2025. Do US troops in the region stand any chance if Iran reconsiders its miscalculations of last year?

🚨🇮🇷 US Nightmare: Iran's Shahab-3 missile keeps Pentagon up all night If diplomacy fails, Tehran's Shahab-3 missiles loom as the brutal reality facing Washington. 🔸 The missile can hit 1,000-2,000 km away, flies back in at MACH 7 SPEED, uses liquid fuel for quick strikes on nearby enemies 🔸 The Shahab-3 guides itself with basic tech, hits within 2,500 meters, new upgrades slip past defenses, reports hint at chemical or bio warheads in 2025 🔸 Under 50 mobile launchers ready to roll, hidden sites protect them, output ramps to 70 a year for steady buildup 🔸 The missile already has some improvements, such as the conical tip of the Shahab-3B, which reduces the payload to 700 kg to improve its maneuverability, cluster bombs (5 of 280 kg each) that increase damage, and later missiles such as the Emad and Ghadr, which achieve greater accuracy (with a margin of error of 30-50 m) at a distance of 1,700-1,950 km. 🔸 Tests in the Gulf challenge US ships, space launches conceal long-range missile development, and nuclear overtures weaken US control in a changing world. Iran already penetrated the combined defenses of the US and Israel in 2025. Do US troops in the region stand any chance if Iran reconsiders its miscalculations of last year?

NewRulesGeopolitics

31,358 views • 6 months ago

🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸PENTAGON IN PANIC MODE: CHINA WILL MATCH U.S. NAVAL POWER BY THE 2030s America is showing off its huge navy in the Iran war — with 20 warships, 3 aircraft carriers, and over 100 daily strikes from far away. But China is watching — and saying: "That's exactly how NOT to do it." Beijing is following the same global strength, but smarter. 🔸 The US Navy is the only fleet today that can sustain months-long, high-intensity operations thousands of km from home bases — China is rapidly closing that gap. 🔸 China is expanding its fleet with new aircraft carriers, helicopter carriers, and large landing ships specifically designed for operations far beyond Taiwan. 🔸 By the early 2030s, China will be ready for complex missions like supporting friendly countries with sea and air forces — according to expert Sidharth Kaushal of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI.) 🔸 Key challenges remain: the “first island chain” (Japan-Taiwan-Philippines) blocks easy access to the open ocean, only one overseas base in Djibouti, and a remaining lag in quiet nuclear-powered attack submarines. 🔸 China is investing in big manned warships as essential command centers for drones, lasers, railguns, and energy weapons — plus they handle real-world diplomatic tasks like boarding ships to control sea routes 🔸 Instead of copying the US model, China is carefully analyzing its weaknesses: vulnerable carriers, heavy reliance on complex supply lines, and the steep political price of endless global missions. 🔸 This is shaping a smarter alternative strategy — prioritizing strong regional dominance supported by advanced tech, drone swarms, and asymmetric tools rather than pure worldwide power projection. Do you think China will have a powerful global naval presence by 2030?

🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸PENTAGON IN PANIC MODE: CHINA WILL MATCH U.S. NAVAL POWER BY THE 2030s America is showing off its huge navy in the Iran war — with 20 warships, 3 aircraft carriers, and over 100 daily strikes from far away. But China is watching — and saying: "That's exactly how NOT to do it." Beijing is following the same global strength, but smarter. 🔸 The US Navy is the only fleet today that can sustain months-long, high-intensity operations thousands of km from home bases — China is rapidly closing that gap. 🔸 China is expanding its fleet with new aircraft carriers, helicopter carriers, and large landing ships specifically designed for operations far beyond Taiwan. 🔸 By the early 2030s, China will be ready for complex missions like supporting friendly countries with sea and air forces — according to expert Sidharth Kaushal of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI.) 🔸 Key challenges remain: the “first island chain” (Japan-Taiwan-Philippines) blocks easy access to the open ocean, only one overseas base in Djibouti, and a remaining lag in quiet nuclear-powered attack submarines. 🔸 China is investing in big manned warships as essential command centers for drones, lasers, railguns, and energy weapons — plus they handle real-world diplomatic tasks like boarding ships to control sea routes 🔸 Instead of copying the US model, China is carefully analyzing its weaknesses: vulnerable carriers, heavy reliance on complex supply lines, and the steep political price of endless global missions. 🔸 This is shaping a smarter alternative strategy — prioritizing strong regional dominance supported by advanced tech, drone swarms, and asymmetric tools rather than pure worldwide power projection. Do you think China will have a powerful global naval presence by 2030?

NewRulesGeopolitics

17,795 views • 3 months ago

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON'S NIGHTMARE: CHINA DEPLOYS DF-27 SHIP-SLAYER ACROSS PACIFIC China’s DF-27 mobile hypersonic missile system is now openly rolling on public roads — and Western intel is scrambling. This missile is built to sink carriers and hammer distant naval bases from thousands of kilometers away, turning the US fleet posture into a liability. 🔸 DF-27 spotted in convoy on Hebei roads, April 2026 — three launchers under tarps, same chassis as DF-26 but with extended nose section over the cab 🔸 5,000–8,000 km range with hypersonic glide vehicle hitting Mach 5+ on maneuvering trajectory — tested 2,100 km in 12 minutes 🔸 Designed to shred carrier strike groups and bases across the First, Second, and Third Island Chains — Pacific and Indian Ocean ops now under direct threat 🔸 Built from DF-17/DF-26 lessons, solid-fuel, road-mobile, near-impossible to track once launched. Do you think the U.S. can stop China’s hypersonic DF-27?

🚨🇨🇳 PENTAGON'S NIGHTMARE: CHINA DEPLOYS DF-27 SHIP-SLAYER ACROSS PACIFIC China’s DF-27 mobile hypersonic missile system is now openly rolling on public roads — and Western intel is scrambling. This missile is built to sink carriers and hammer distant naval bases from thousands of kilometers away, turning the US fleet posture into a liability. 🔸 DF-27 spotted in convoy on Hebei roads, April 2026 — three launchers under tarps, same chassis as DF-26 but with extended nose section over the cab 🔸 5,000–8,000 km range with hypersonic glide vehicle hitting Mach 5+ on maneuvering trajectory — tested 2,100 km in 12 minutes 🔸 Designed to shred carrier strike groups and bases across the First, Second, and Third Island Chains — Pacific and Indian Ocean ops now under direct threat 🔸 Built from DF-17/DF-26 lessons, solid-fuel, road-mobile, near-impossible to track once launched. Do you think the U.S. can stop China’s hypersonic DF-27?

NewRulesGeopolitics

16,947 views • 3 months ago