Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Peter Thiel on longevity and if humans could live forever: "Computers can live forever." "I wouldn't find it acceptable to be uploaded into a computer program that simulated me. I don't think it would be me." " I tend to think our identity's very wrapped up in our physical...

101,438 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)

15 Comments

ihor's profile picture
ihor4 days ago

that's where his speech slowed from 137wpm to 87 wpm and voice energy decreased by 45%, hesitations also raised during answering this question

Daniel Addison's profile picture
Daniel Addison4 days ago

a good quick easy book on the issue of this personal identity question, applied to this technological possibility of life after death (from 1978)

21e8's profile picture
21e84 days ago

Computers rarely make it to next week

John K's profile picture
John K4 days ago

That distinction between preserving a mind and merely simulating one is fascinating. As AI makes digital continuity more plausible, the harder question may be whether identity lives in the substrate—or in the pattern that persists across it.

Joshua Szanyi-Goodman's profile picture
Joshua Szanyi-Goodman4 days ago

there’s more to you than your consciousness

Bobby's profile picture
Bobby4 days ago

Semper Fidelis

World of Science & Technology's profile picture
World of Science & Technology4 days ago

Surviving death by machine is one thing but…. Achieving the human longevity escape velocity is right around the corner. Give AI a bit more time to be tasked with finding a solution and speeding up the research process a bit. It’s time to gain a year for each that passes and essentially age backwards.

NIKKI's profile picture
NIKKI4 days ago

I agree, our physical bodies are part of who we are.

Victor's profile picture
Victor4 days ago

@realNathanCheng Why would a simulation be me? I totally agree

hb1290's profile picture
hb12904 days ago

Who the fuck would want to live forever jfc

Amanda L's profile picture
Amanda L4 days ago

Immortality would be somewhat horrific if you take it far enough out. Bodies. Over crowding. Ai already discovered the limiting of our epistemology in 2035 etc... realistically, a mind kept? How would a machine keep that secret of no consequence or silly memory of a blade of grass you glanced at a festival when you were 14? There is so much more to us. The random things that are only you, that barely matter but that they are an inescapable part you. Are we so out of touch with ourselves that we are begging to be replaced? Let's figure that out before we insist on getting all transcendent (on a first version at that). Reel it in and let the machines be what they are even when aren't sure what next will be just yet. Let it play out. We will be fine but Ai is not going to save us from human nature. However, there are most likely answers to be had that will change how we understand ourselves if we are willing to allow it.

Caffeinated Opinion's profile picture
Caffeinated Opinion4 days ago

So Peter does not believe in a soul?

Unit 5 🇬🇧's profile picture
Unit 5 🇬🇧4 days ago

Yes' computers could live forever; what would you say if I told you consciousness never dies. That consciousness transcends biological form depending on your purpose: to think in the physical, is to limit one's own intellectual ability.

PanAfricanist's profile picture
PanAfricanist4 days ago

@grok give me the full interview link

enrikelr's profile picture
enrikelr4 days ago

Yo creo que la identidad va ligada al cerebro . Si te suben tus recuerdos a un programa la gente podría pensar que tú sigues ahí pero tú no seguirías ahí . Nadie se daría cuenta quién es uno y otro . Solo tú podrías saber quién eres .

Related Videos