Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Pfizer Knowingly Caused 18,000 Women To Develop Brain Tumors. Birth control injections cause 5X more Meningioma brain tumors & Pfizer has known for decades. Other countries warn patients of the 5.6X greater risk, but the US FDA never forced Pfizer to warn the public. Depo-Provera’s journey to approval was... fraught with ethical issues. Clinical trials in the 1960s & 1970s often targeted vulnerable populations, including low-income women & those in developing countries, many of whom were not fully informed about the drug’s risks. Concerns about side effects—including menstrual irregularities, significant bone density loss & potential links to cancer—sparked public outcry. Advocacy groups criticized the lack of informed consent during trials, particularly in populations with limited access to alternative family planning methods. The FDA approved Depo-Provera as a contraceptive in 1992. 42 million women use injectable long term chemical contraception & in the US, use is 25%---1 in 4 women use injectable birth control. In March 2024, a study published in The BMJ investigated the use of various progestogens & the risk of developing intracranial meningiomas. The research analyzed data from over 18,000 women who underwent surgery for meningiomas. The findings showed that prolonged use (defined as one year or more) of certain progestogens, including medroxyprogesterone acetate (marketed as Depo-Provera), had an increased risk of meningiomas. Specifically, the study reported a 5.6-fold increased risk for users of medroxyprogesterone acetate injections.show more

Valerie Anne Smith

278,551 subscribers

21,702 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

30 Comments

Valerie Anne Smith1 month ago

Pfizer Depo-Provera Patients: 240% Increase Risk Of Meningioma Brain Tumors In The United States.

Valerie Anne Smith1 month ago

18,000 Women Suffer Meningioma Brain Tumors Caused By Pfizer Depo-Provera:

Valerie Anne Smith1 month ago

Pfizer Depo-Provera And Meningioma Brain Tumors:

SeaTurtleTūtū1 month ago

Let’s also talk about the fact that this shot caused infertility, obesity, mental health issues and more. I was on it for 4 years. Was never able to have any more children after my first child was born.

Kelly’s Ghost1 month ago

It’s prob . more than that imagine how many went un reported as being such.

Valerie Anne Smith1 month ago

Exactly... reporting of injuries is always very low.

JamieLynn_TrumpGrl💋1 month ago

Pfizer did so many evil things & are getting away with it. Disgusting!

Valerie Anne Smith1 month ago

They get a slap on the wrist... maybe. Then they just go on to create another harmful drug or vaccine.

JamieLynn_TrumpGrl💋1 month ago

We really are living in a dangerous society! God be with us!🙏

Mike TP Canada1 month ago

My pain very much comes from my brain. They've done mri's and found nothing. No one knows whats wrong with me

MAGA VIRAL REELS1 month ago

We have not forgotten😡

HorseGuy1 month ago

Not much from pharma is actually helping people be healthy. It's all marketing.

Peter Freitag1 month ago

@J_M_Jacoby

Kurt1 month ago

every generation there’s some pharma WOOPSIE that poisons a population and keeps the genocide rolling. what a sickening garbage society

Marissa1 month ago

Pfizer exploiting vulnerable women in trials and hiding a massive brain tumor risk for decades just to protect their profits... not shocked by this unchecked corporate negligence

GodisAll1 month ago

C’est ce qui arrive lorsque la loi naturelle n’est pas respectée.

Carol Smith1 month ago

18,000 women developing brain tumors linked to the shot is a big number. That information should have been more widely shared.

Dragonfly1 month ago

😡⚖️⛓️‍💥💥 I can’t believe how much evil has been going on in this country for sooo long!!!

alfred1 month ago

Maybe being a thot turns out to be a terrible choice.

Dave MacDonell1 month ago

Public health is only okay if Val approves Goes with her Christo-fascist enthusiasm Hope Pfizer comes after you for defamation and damages for lying

John Curtis1 month ago

Genocide

as ewe wi§h/ÊWEtōP@1 month ago

@grok wut say ewe?

jack beamon1 month ago

The FDA is the political department of Pfizer.

Tony Masimple1 month ago

What a Dumb Supremacist Zionist debater!

South🧭1 month ago

You know what's great? The US is a no communism state, allowing companies to do whatever they want. So happy we aren't communists like those EU countries living happier and healthier. Success = making 1% richer!

Elite Light1 month ago

evil. they are evil. choose you this day...one or the other...

Karen1 month ago

Stop taking any kind of birth control please this is what the government and doctors want to control you. Stop trusting them with anything like this

Jesus Is The Way, The Truth & The Life 🙏✝️🕊️1 month ago

Outrageous! Please put a stop to this and then hold them accountable!!! @SecKennedy @DrOz

Josh Anderson1 month ago

@threadreaderapp unroll

TheOrdinaryAmerican1 month ago

Again men trick women into believing birth control and abortion are for them. Who bears the cost of these things? I don’t see the study that a shot that a woman takes so a man doesn’t have to figure out self control gives the man brain tumors. And abortion? Do men bear any of the physical, emotional or mental or spiritual burdens? Who carries the burden? Women are being used. Wake up.

Related Videos

🚨 BREAKING: Pfizer’s trial date was just set in a lawsuit by thousands of women who allege their birth control drug caused brain tumors. Dr. Karl Jablonowski just broke down this massive lawsuit on CHD TV: “Depo-Provera is a very popular form of contraception.” “There is an estimate that about one in four women have ever taken it.” “And recent research shows that if you are on this medication for up to a year, you’re around three to five times more likely to develop this form of brain cancer.” “It’s produced by Pfizer.” “In one version of events, Pfizer finds out that this adverse event occurs with their product, and then they ask the FDA if they should update their label.” “And the FDA says no.” “A lot of courts may interpret that as preemption, where the FDA is holding Pfizer to not be liable for any of these brain cancers.” “But that version of events depends on Pfizer being a good actor.” “They have been found guilty 107 times over the last 26 years, paying out $11 billion.” “22 of those were False Claims Act, defrauding the government.” “With Depo-Provera, to harness the power of the ‘no’ from the FDA, you need to know someone in high places—and they did.” “The director of the Centers for Drug Evaluation and Research was Dr. Cavazzoni, who was a former employee of Pfizer.” “Dr. Cavazzoni is now the chief medical officer and executive vice president at Pfizer.”

🚨 BREAKING: Pfizer’s trial date was just set in a lawsuit by thousands of women who allege their birth control drug caused brain tumors. Dr. Karl Jablonowski just broke down this massive lawsuit on CHD TV: “Depo-Provera is a very popular form of contraception.” “There is an estimate that about one in four women have ever taken it.” “And recent research shows that if you are on this medication for up to a year, you’re around three to five times more likely to develop this form of brain cancer.” “It’s produced by Pfizer.” “In one version of events, Pfizer finds out that this adverse event occurs with their product, and then they ask the FDA if they should update their label.” “And the FDA says no.” “A lot of courts may interpret that as preemption, where the FDA is holding Pfizer to not be liable for any of these brain cancers.” “But that version of events depends on Pfizer being a good actor.” “They have been found guilty 107 times over the last 26 years, paying out $11 billion.” “22 of those were False Claims Act, defrauding the government.” “With Depo-Provera, to harness the power of the ‘no’ from the FDA, you need to know someone in high places—and they did.” “The director of the Centers for Drug Evaluation and Research was Dr. Cavazzoni, who was a former employee of Pfizer.” “Dr. Cavazzoni is now the chief medical officer and executive vice president at Pfizer.”

Children’s Health Defense

43,589 views • 7 months ago

This Zimbabwean member of parliament whose parliamentary submission has gone viral is making a valid point based on peer-reviewed research. She is essentially saying that men who have regular sex are also reducing their risk of prostate cancer. Medical studies suggest a link between frequent ejaculation and a reduced risk of prostate cancer. However, the exact number of times a man should ejaculate per month to maintain optimal prostate health has not been definitively established. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that men who reported ejaculating at least 21 times a month had a lower risk of developing prostate cancer compared to those who ejaculated less frequently. The study, which followed over 31,000 men for several years, suggested a correlation between frequent ejaculation and a lower risk of prostate cancer. A study conducted by Australian researchers and published in the journal British Journal of Urology (BJU) in 2003 found that men who ejaculated more than five times per week in their 20s had a reduced risk of prostate cancer compared to those who ejaculated less frequently. A 2008 study in the British Journal of Urology International examined over 30,000 men and found that those who reported higher ejaculation frequency showed a lower risk of prostate cancer. A 2016 study published in the journal European Urology investigated the association between ejaculation frequency and the risk of prostate cancer. The study found that men with a higher ejaculation frequency had a lower risk of developing prostate cancer, particularly in their 40s. Men over 40 should have regular medical check-ups and discuss any concerns about their prostate health with healthcare providers such as nurses and doctors. While this data is available for us to engage with, we cannot return to the old tradition she mentions in her presentation of passing on young women from the wife’s family to older men. The JAMA study's findings do not justify the revival of the outdated and exploitative traditional practice of passing young women from the wife's family to older men. Read more here; More👇🏿

This Zimbabwean member of parliament whose parliamentary submission has gone viral is making a valid point based on peer-reviewed research. She is essentially saying that men who have regular sex are also reducing their risk of prostate cancer. Medical studies suggest a link between frequent ejaculation and a reduced risk of prostate cancer. However, the exact number of times a man should ejaculate per month to maintain optimal prostate health has not been definitively established. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found that men who reported ejaculating at least 21 times a month had a lower risk of developing prostate cancer compared to those who ejaculated less frequently. The study, which followed over 31,000 men for several years, suggested a correlation between frequent ejaculation and a lower risk of prostate cancer. A study conducted by Australian researchers and published in the journal British Journal of Urology (BJU) in 2003 found that men who ejaculated more than five times per week in their 20s had a reduced risk of prostate cancer compared to those who ejaculated less frequently. A 2008 study in the British Journal of Urology International examined over 30,000 men and found that those who reported higher ejaculation frequency showed a lower risk of prostate cancer. A 2016 study published in the journal European Urology investigated the association between ejaculation frequency and the risk of prostate cancer. The study found that men with a higher ejaculation frequency had a lower risk of developing prostate cancer, particularly in their 40s. Men over 40 should have regular medical check-ups and discuss any concerns about their prostate health with healthcare providers such as nurses and doctors. While this data is available for us to engage with, we cannot return to the old tradition she mentions in her presentation of passing on young women from the wife’s family to older men. The JAMA study's findings do not justify the revival of the outdated and exploitative traditional practice of passing young women from the wife's family to older men. Read more here; More👇🏿

Hopewell Chin’ono

127,956 views • 2 years ago

My understanding, listening to hours of Robert F. Kennedy Jr is that he asserts that the US regulatory system of pharmaceuticals & foods is broken & captured by the industries it supposes to regulate! Many serious scientists agree with this assertion! Mainstream media and people like Paul Offit use the typical tactics of calling people conspiracists instead of addressing RFK arguments! Ironically, they are part of the system & narrative that pushed the harmful COVID vaccines into massive use, including in children & pregnant women! Offit speaks about transparency re the COVID vaccine approval process but neglects to acknowledge that FDA & Pfizer wanted to conceal the data for 75 years! He said he read 800 pages as a member of the advisory committee to the approval process, but he missed(?) the fact that the Pfizer vaccines given to the US & world population were fundamentally different than the ones in the clinical trials & with high level of DNA contamination! Who should we believe?

My understanding, listening to hours of Robert F. Kennedy Jr is that he asserts that the US regulatory system of pharmaceuticals & foods is broken & captured by the industries it supposes to regulate! Many serious scientists agree with this assertion! Mainstream media and people like Paul Offit use the typical tactics of calling people conspiracists instead of addressing RFK arguments! Ironically, they are part of the system & narrative that pushed the harmful COVID vaccines into massive use, including in children & pregnant women! Offit speaks about transparency re the COVID vaccine approval process but neglects to acknowledge that FDA & Pfizer wanted to conceal the data for 75 years! He said he read 800 pages as a member of the advisory committee to the approval process, but he missed(?) the fact that the Pfizer vaccines given to the US & world population were fundamentally different than the ones in the clinical trials & with high level of DNA contamination! Who should we believe?

Retsef Levi

64,681 views • 1 year ago

In the UK, only around 14% of menopausal women take HRT and this number usually shocks people. But as you can hear Dr Mary Claire Haver talk about here - in the US it is only 4% now, when just over 20 years ago it was around 40%. Much of this reduction in HRT use and the negativity regarding HRT stems from the misinterpretation of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study which was published in 2002. For those of you who don’t know much about this, in 1993, the WHI began a clinical trial looking at the health effects of women taking oestrogen-only or combined HRT compared to a placebo. In 2002, researchers halted the part of the study looking at women taking both oestrogen and progesterone (two hormones that decline during the perimenopause onwards) early over concerns there were small increased risks of breast cancer, heart disease, strokes and blood clots. This led to confusion and concern from doctors and women worldwide, and in the UK women taking HRT fell sharply. But even with the older versions of HRT, the WHI researchers have subsequently acknowledged that HRT is the most effective treatment for managing menopausal symptoms like hot flushes and that taking oestrogen alone reduces the risk of breast cancer by 23% and death by breast cancer by 40%. It is time we move on from the misinterpretation of this study and allow more women to access hormone replacement if that is what they want.

In the UK, only around 14% of menopausal women take HRT and this number usually shocks people. But as you can hear Dr Mary Claire Haver talk about here - in the US it is only 4% now, when just over 20 years ago it was around 40%. Much of this reduction in HRT use and the negativity regarding HRT stems from the misinterpretation of the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study which was published in 2002. For those of you who don’t know much about this, in 1993, the WHI began a clinical trial looking at the health effects of women taking oestrogen-only or combined HRT compared to a placebo. In 2002, researchers halted the part of the study looking at women taking both oestrogen and progesterone (two hormones that decline during the perimenopause onwards) early over concerns there were small increased risks of breast cancer, heart disease, strokes and blood clots. This led to confusion and concern from doctors and women worldwide, and in the UK women taking HRT fell sharply. But even with the older versions of HRT, the WHI researchers have subsequently acknowledged that HRT is the most effective treatment for managing menopausal symptoms like hot flushes and that taking oestrogen alone reduces the risk of breast cancer by 23% and death by breast cancer by 40%. It is time we move on from the misinterpretation of this study and allow more women to access hormone replacement if that is what they want.

Dr Louise Newson

39,139 views • 2 years ago

I find it astonishing that the public did not care about the mutilation of women's healthy breasts until the trans issue became criticized - that the experimentation on the healthy bodies of women and girls, being surgically harmed for no reason other than sexual objectification, was not contested when it was being done for pornographic purposes. For over three decades in the US silicone injections and breast implants were sold to women - many of whom developed brain cancer, or breast cancer, or died as a direct result - and not a single peer-reviewed study was released during that time on how this impacted women's health. Historically this issue was repeatedly addressed - women had suffered immensely - but it was not taken seriously. In this video from 2005, the then President of the National Organization for Women, Kim Gandy, criticized FDA Commissioner Lester M. Crawford during a press conference: "Lester Crawford is a veterinarian, but at the FDA, he's treating women like dogs." The single experiment conducted before breast implants were performed on women was done on a female dog, and the implant removed two weeks after; then, the surgeons declared the procedure to be "as harmless as water."

I find it astonishing that the public did not care about the mutilation of women's healthy breasts until the trans issue became criticized - that the experimentation on the healthy bodies of women and girls, being surgically harmed for no reason other than sexual objectification, was not contested when it was being done for pornographic purposes. For over three decades in the US silicone injections and breast implants were sold to women - many of whom developed brain cancer, or breast cancer, or died as a direct result - and not a single peer-reviewed study was released during that time on how this impacted women's health. Historically this issue was repeatedly addressed - women had suffered immensely - but it was not taken seriously. In this video from 2005, the then President of the National Organization for Women, Kim Gandy, criticized FDA Commissioner Lester M. Crawford during a press conference: "Lester Crawford is a veterinarian, but at the FDA, he's treating women like dogs." The single experiment conducted before breast implants were performed on women was done on a female dog, and the implant removed two weeks after; then, the surgeons declared the procedure to be "as harmless as water."

Genevieve Gluck

157,723 views • 3 years ago

12 MILLION DOSES OF PFIZER mRNA COVID JAB ADMINISTERED IN NZ BEFORE VACCINATORS WERE MANDATED TO INFORM VACINEES OF MYOCARDITIS RISK... Today in the NZ Herald, journalist Derek Chen published an incredibly thorough and well referenced deep dive into Government decision making (and withholding of information) relating to Covid injection recommendations to NZ teens (and their parents). It is incredibly frustrating to find such a significant article placed behind a paywall, and not reproduced in the printed newspaper. Here I focus on just one small aspect of the article....small in word count but ENORMOUS in real life negative impact. Quote: The Royal Commission Phase Two report said efforts to communicate the risk of heart inflammation were “extensive”, but VACCINATORS DIDN'T ALWAYS TELL CLIENTS ABOUT THE RISKS, NOR DID THEIR GUIDELINES ALWAYS REQUIRE THEM TO. At the time of Petousis-Harris’ email, September 2021, the Ministry of Health’s guidance for District Health Boards (DHBs) and providers mentioned heart inflammation as a rare side effect “BUT DID NOT RECOMMEND IT BE DISCUSSED WITH PATIENTS BEFORE ADMINISTERING THE VACCINE" the commission’s report said. In December 2021, providers were told to inform clients about possible symptoms, but “GUIDANCE WAS NOT ALWAYS EXPLICIT ABOUT THE NEED TO DISCUSS THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS AND PERICARDITIS, INCLUDING BEFORE VACCINATING, AS PART OF THE INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS" It wasn’t until MORE THAN A YEAR LATER in February 2023, that this guidance was updated to “EXPLICITLY REQUIRE vaccinators to discuss the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis as part of the informed consent process”. Guidance from the Immunisation Advisory Centre was updated to include this requirement in July 2022, though its clinical toolkit included information about myocarditis from November 2021 and its training courses for vaccinators included such information from July 2021. The importance of this for informed consent was underlined in a 2024 report from the Health and Disability Commissioner about a man in his 20s who died in 2021 from myocarditis caused by the vaccine he’d received at a pharmacy 12 days earlier. (RORY NAIRN) “The consumer WAS NOT INFORMED about the risk of myocarditis either prior to receiving the vaccine (as part of the informed consent process) or after (as part of safety-netting advice),” the report said. “Notwithstanding the low probability of occurrence, the risk of myocarditis was something that a reasonable consumer at the time would have expected to be informed about. “Official information sources did not make it adequately clear to vaccinators that consumers needed to be told about myocarditis prior to receiving the vaccination.” NZ VACCINATORS WERE NOT MANDATED TO INFORM COVID 19 VACINEES OF THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS UNTIL FEBRUARY 2023. In order to understand the degree of negligence and medical malpractice inherent in this timeline, I encourage you to fully read a detailed global Myocarditis timeline, compiled painstakingly by one of the Health Forum team: 12 Millions of doses of Pfizer mRNA were administered in New Zealand, including to teens and young men and greatest risk of mRNA induced Myocarditis WITH ZERO MANDATE FOR FULL INFORMED CONSENT AND ZERO MENTION OF THE POSSIBILITY OF POTENTIALLY DEADLY HEART DAMAGE - MYOCARDITIS Below is a video of Rory Nairn's mum, Christine. Rory, aged 26, died suddenly from Myocarditis, later confirmed causally linked to receipt of the Pfizer mRNA in New Zealand. He was not told of this risk at the time of his injection or afterwards. He died suddenly in his bathroom in the middle of the night, less than 2 weeks later. Aged 26

12 MILLION DOSES OF PFIZER mRNA COVID JAB ADMINISTERED IN NZ BEFORE VACCINATORS WERE MANDATED TO INFORM VACINEES OF MYOCARDITIS RISK... Today in the NZ Herald, journalist Derek Chen published an incredibly thorough and well referenced deep dive into Government decision making (and withholding of information) relating to Covid injection recommendations to NZ teens (and their parents). It is incredibly frustrating to find such a significant article placed behind a paywall, and not reproduced in the printed newspaper. Here I focus on just one small aspect of the article....small in word count but ENORMOUS in real life negative impact. Quote: The Royal Commission Phase Two report said efforts to communicate the risk of heart inflammation were “extensive”, but VACCINATORS DIDN'T ALWAYS TELL CLIENTS ABOUT THE RISKS, NOR DID THEIR GUIDELINES ALWAYS REQUIRE THEM TO. At the time of Petousis-Harris’ email, September 2021, the Ministry of Health’s guidance for District Health Boards (DHBs) and providers mentioned heart inflammation as a rare side effect “BUT DID NOT RECOMMEND IT BE DISCUSSED WITH PATIENTS BEFORE ADMINISTERING THE VACCINE" the commission’s report said. In December 2021, providers were told to inform clients about possible symptoms, but “GUIDANCE WAS NOT ALWAYS EXPLICIT ABOUT THE NEED TO DISCUSS THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS AND PERICARDITIS, INCLUDING BEFORE VACCINATING, AS PART OF THE INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS" It wasn’t until MORE THAN A YEAR LATER in February 2023, that this guidance was updated to “EXPLICITLY REQUIRE vaccinators to discuss the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis as part of the informed consent process”. Guidance from the Immunisation Advisory Centre was updated to include this requirement in July 2022, though its clinical toolkit included information about myocarditis from November 2021 and its training courses for vaccinators included such information from July 2021. The importance of this for informed consent was underlined in a 2024 report from the Health and Disability Commissioner about a man in his 20s who died in 2021 from myocarditis caused by the vaccine he’d received at a pharmacy 12 days earlier. (RORY NAIRN) “The consumer WAS NOT INFORMED about the risk of myocarditis either prior to receiving the vaccine (as part of the informed consent process) or after (as part of safety-netting advice),” the report said. “Notwithstanding the low probability of occurrence, the risk of myocarditis was something that a reasonable consumer at the time would have expected to be informed about. “Official information sources did not make it adequately clear to vaccinators that consumers needed to be told about myocarditis prior to receiving the vaccination.” NZ VACCINATORS WERE NOT MANDATED TO INFORM COVID 19 VACINEES OF THE RISK OF MYOCARDITIS UNTIL FEBRUARY 2023. In order to understand the degree of negligence and medical malpractice inherent in this timeline, I encourage you to fully read a detailed global Myocarditis timeline, compiled painstakingly by one of the Health Forum team: 12 Millions of doses of Pfizer mRNA were administered in New Zealand, including to teens and young men and greatest risk of mRNA induced Myocarditis WITH ZERO MANDATE FOR FULL INFORMED CONSENT AND ZERO MENTION OF THE POSSIBILITY OF POTENTIALLY DEADLY HEART DAMAGE - MYOCARDITIS Below is a video of Rory Nairn's mum, Christine. Rory, aged 26, died suddenly from Myocarditis, later confirmed causally linked to receipt of the Pfizer mRNA in New Zealand. He was not told of this risk at the time of his injection or afterwards. He died suddenly in his bathroom in the middle of the night, less than 2 weeks later. Aged 26

NZ and the MRNA

17,026 views • 1 month ago

TRUTH IS COMING. Kansas is the first state of many who is suing Pfizer for misleading information given to Kansas consumers. Pfizer marketed the vaccine was safe for pregnant - However, in 2016 they had possession of a study that showed more than 1/2 of the pregnant women who took the vax had an adverse event - more than 10% reported a miscarriage. Safety relating to heart conditions like myocarditis and the CEO said they had not seen a single signal which was not true - They knew the vax cause myocarditis. Pfizer said the vax protected against the variants but at the time data showed the vax was effective less than half the time. About transmission - Pfizer urged Americans to get the vax indicating that getting the vax stopped the transmission of Covid - Pfizer later admitted that they never even studied transmission. Pfizer also engaged in censorship attempts with social media. Kansas is the first of 5 states to file lawsuits.

TRUTH IS COMING. Kansas is the first state of many who is suing Pfizer for misleading information given to Kansas consumers. Pfizer marketed the vaccine was safe for pregnant - However, in 2016 they had possession of a study that showed more than 1/2 of the pregnant women who took the vax had an adverse event - more than 10% reported a miscarriage. Safety relating to heart conditions like myocarditis and the CEO said they had not seen a single signal which was not true - They knew the vax cause myocarditis. Pfizer said the vax protected against the variants but at the time data showed the vax was effective less than half the time. About transmission - Pfizer urged Americans to get the vax indicating that getting the vax stopped the transmission of Covid - Pfizer later admitted that they never even studied transmission. Pfizer also engaged in censorship attempts with social media. Kansas is the first of 5 states to file lawsuits.

BelannF

715,263 views • 1 year ago

PFIZER IS IN BIG TROUBLE. NEW interview with Kris Kobach, Attorney General for the State of Kansas, who is suing Pfizer, along with 5 x other American States. He mentions they knew 10% of women had miscarriages: "Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women and they had information in their possession not only of of causing you know grave problems for pregnant rats but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases" TRANSCRIPT FOR CLIP: NEWSMAX "You're suing Pfizer for misleading claims on the covid vaccine sir round of applause for you on this what's this about and what's your case" KRIS KOBACK "Well the case is that Pfizer violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act and by the way all 50 states have some version of a consumer Protection act and while the federal government gave all the vaccine manufacturers immunity from normal tort suits, where someone who's injured would sue the company seeking damages for their injury, the federal government did not give the vaccine manufacturers license to misrepresent or state things that they knew to be false when trying to push their product, and that's what this lawsuit is about" "[Pfizer] made multiple misrepresentations, including saying it was safe for pregnant women, when Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women. And they had information in their possession not only of of causing, you know grave problems for pregnant rats, but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications, including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases..... just think about that a person dies in every miscarriage and yet they proceeded to advertise it as safe for pregnant women". This lawsuit also highlights the amount of ignorance within other government departments, that are still pushing the "safe and effective" narrative on a Global scale. Add on top of the that the more recent accumulating evidence of DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, and you have a ticking time bomb for the Pharmaceutical industry

PFIZER IS IN BIG TROUBLE. NEW interview with Kris Kobach, Attorney General for the State of Kansas, who is suing Pfizer, along with 5 x other American States. He mentions they knew 10% of women had miscarriages: "Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women and they had information in their possession not only of of causing you know grave problems for pregnant rats but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases" TRANSCRIPT FOR CLIP: NEWSMAX "You're suing Pfizer for misleading claims on the covid vaccine sir round of applause for you on this what's this about and what's your case" KRIS KOBACK "Well the case is that Pfizer violated the Kansas Consumer Protection Act and by the way all 50 states have some version of a consumer Protection act and while the federal government gave all the vaccine manufacturers immunity from normal tort suits, where someone who's injured would sue the company seeking damages for their injury, the federal government did not give the vaccine manufacturers license to misrepresent or state things that they knew to be false when trying to push their product, and that's what this lawsuit is about" "[Pfizer] made multiple misrepresentations, including saying it was safe for pregnant women, when Pfizer was well aware of the many risks to pregnant women. And they had information in their possession not only of of causing, you know grave problems for pregnant rats, but they also had information as early as February 2021 on 458 pregnant women and they knew that there were complications, including miscarriages in over 10% of the cases..... just think about that a person dies in every miscarriage and yet they proceeded to advertise it as safe for pregnant women". This lawsuit also highlights the amount of ignorance within other government departments, that are still pushing the "safe and effective" narrative on a Global scale. Add on top of the that the more recent accumulating evidence of DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, and you have a ticking time bomb for the Pharmaceutical industry

Humanspective

549,102 views • 1 year ago

$Women have been misled by medical dogma for decades. It's time for the truth about Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT). As Dr. Marty Makary explains, the pervasive fear that HRT increases a woman's risk of dying from breast cancer is not supported by clinical trial data. This critical misunderstanding has robbed countless women of profound health benefits. The short-term relief from perimenopause symptoms—like hot flashes, night sweats, and mood swings—is well-known. But the long-term benefits are truly staggering and largely underappreciated: ✅ Cuts the risk of heart attacks by 25-50% (the #1 killer of women). ✅ Reduces the risk of cognitive decline & Alzheimer's by up to 64%. ✅ Slashes the risk of osteoporosis and debilitating bone fractures in half. When initiated within 10 years of perimenopause, HRT may be one of the most impactful preventive medications in modern history for improving women's long-term health outcomes on a population level. Yet, as Dr. Makary points out, it remains underrecognized, underappreciated, and underfunded. This is a pivotal issue in women's health that demands attention. Every woman deserves to know the real data, beyond the outdated dogma, to make an informed decision with her doctor.$

Women have been misled by medical dogma for decades. It's time for the truth about Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT). As Dr. Marty Makary explains, the pervasive fear that HRT increases a woman's risk of dying from breast cancer is not supported by clinical trial data. This critical misunderstanding has robbed countless women of profound health benefits. The short-term relief from perimenopause symptoms—like hot flashes, night sweats, and mood swings—is well-known. But the long-term benefits are truly staggering and largely underappreciated: ✅ Cuts the risk of heart attacks by 25-50% (the #1 killer of women). ✅ Reduces the risk of cognitive decline & Alzheimer's by up to 64%. ✅ Slashes the risk of osteoporosis and debilitating bone fractures in half. When initiated within 10 years of perimenopause, HRT may be one of the most impactful preventive medications in modern history for improving women's long-term health outcomes on a population level. Yet, as Dr. Makary points out, it remains underrecognized, underappreciated, and underfunded. This is a pivotal issue in women's health that demands attention. Every woman deserves to know the real data, beyond the outdated dogma, to make an informed decision with her doctor.

Camus

83,549 views • 1 year ago

💥RFK - "The immunity which was passed in 1986" comes from Wyath (now Pfizer) telling Reagan they'd leave Big Pharma without liability protection. IS THE ERA OF LIABILITY PROTECTION ENDING? 🧵Here's 36 x evidences that might be revealed in the new Kansas suit against PFIZER 💥 ◽️ 1223 Deaths were reported in Pfizer's initial clinical trial data ◽️According to Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, "At NO POINT during the trial was the intervention LIFE SAVING" ◽️ The same DR revealed undisclosed deaths in the vaccinated arm of the Pfizer trial ◽️RFK said that according to Pfizer’s own data, more people died of All Cause Mortality in the vaccine group at the end of a 6 x month period ◽️There was 5 x heart attacks in the vaccine group and only 1 x in the placebo group at the end of that period. An increase of 500% ◽️Guernsey had an increase of 500% in Myocarditis in the year of the roll-out, correlating to Pfizer actual trial data ◽️Pfizer reported to the FDA that Maddie de Garay had a "Stomach ache", when she's in a wheelchair ◽️Pfizer used data for FDA approval that does not match Maddie's adverse events reported in senate testimony for EUA approval and liability protection ◽️ According to Maddie's mother, The FDA approved Pfizer's mRNA covid vaccine for children when Maddie was in hospital from ADEs associated to the mRNA covid product she took in that clinical trial ◽️Pfizer emphasised relative risk as opposed to absolute risk for efficacy and marketing of the effectiveness of their product ◽️For Pfizer in terms of Absolute Risk (not relative risk), there was no Statistically Significant benefit to the prevention of people catching covid for the mRNA vaccinated group ◽️ Pfizer Admitted the NEVER TESTED the vaccine on whether it can prevent TRANSMISSION ◽️ Israeli research found men that were vaccinated had decreased sperm counts ◽️According to RFK, Pfizer had 2 x labels for the same product. The EUA product was available, but the licensed version of the same product was “unavailable” ◽️Pfizer and the FDA tried to withhold the clinical trial evidence for 75 years ◽️ Dr Dr Aseem Malhotra mentioned that Re analysis of the Pfizer data shows an adverse event rate of 1/800 ◽️ An Australian FOI revealed the TGA Bioaccumulation studies that show mRNA Lipid Nano Particles are distributed THROUGHOUT the body ◽️ In similar data, the implantation loss of the mice tested more than doubled in the mRNA group ◽️ Myocarditis is a recognised side effect from governments globally ◽️ Several studies have shown (one done in Israel) Myocarditis only occurs in the vaccinated ◽️Albert Bourla said “MRNA had never delivered a single product” and that Pfizer had less experience with” and that Pfizer and BioNTech were working on mRNA for FLU vaccines from 2018 ◽️ Albert Bourla, when asked on 2 x separate occasions whether he’d taken his own vaccine product, said “NO”, he didn't want to "cut the line" ◽️According to Dr Aseem Malhotra, Pfizer paid front groups to push for Vaccine mandates ◽️Pfizer had special mRNA vaccine batches for their employees according to Pfizer's own spokespeople in Australian Senate testimony ◽️South Africa court released documents revealed Pfizer asked governments to set up insurance scheme for adverse outcomes ◽️Pfizer admitted in the South African court documents that the “long term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known” ◽️Trial data used for assessing pregnancy safety was analysed by researchers that owned stocks in the company that made the product they were evaluating ◽️According to RFK, Pfizer needed to get it recommended to children for liability protection ◽️Kevin McKernan has found DNA CONTAMINATION IN PFIZER - Multiple studies confirm ◽️@P_J_Buckhaults has found DNA contamination ◽️DNA contamination confirmed in Australian Pfizer & Moderna Vials. DNA contamination in Pfizer was over 350 times above per dose limits set by the TGA ◽️Dr. David Martin mentioned that Pfizer admitted their product is experimental gene therapy in filings ◽️Pfizer did not seek approval through Gene Therapy regulations in Australia (Gillespie) ◽Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. mentioned "Trans-placental exposure" of newborns to Pfizer's product ◽️"The miscarriage rate was 80% in the Pfizer trials" ◽️The Pfizer mRNA vaccine is based on a spike protein that strong evidence suggests was a man made virus, potentially done with GOF research ◽️According to the James Okeefe Veritas Whistleblower story, a Pfizer Director stated Pfizer are talking about “Mutating covid viruses” ◽️Dr Peter McCullough, one of the most published Cardiologists, has analyzed all the data and said that Pfizer “should never have been approved” What else is there to add to this list of EVIDENCE? The discovery process for this new Kansas lawsuit against Pfizer is sure to be EPIC

💥RFK - "The immunity which was passed in 1986" comes from Wyath (now Pfizer) telling Reagan they'd leave Big Pharma without liability protection. IS THE ERA OF LIABILITY PROTECTION ENDING? 🧵Here's 36 x evidences that might be revealed in the new Kansas suit against PFIZER 💥 ◽️ 1223 Deaths were reported in Pfizer's initial clinical trial data ◽️According to Dr Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, "At NO POINT during the trial was the intervention LIFE SAVING" ◽️ The same DR revealed undisclosed deaths in the vaccinated arm of the Pfizer trial ◽️RFK said that according to Pfizer’s own data, more people died of All Cause Mortality in the vaccine group at the end of a 6 x month period ◽️There was 5 x heart attacks in the vaccine group and only 1 x in the placebo group at the end of that period. An increase of 500% ◽️Guernsey had an increase of 500% in Myocarditis in the year of the roll-out, correlating to Pfizer actual trial data ◽️Pfizer reported to the FDA that Maddie de Garay had a "Stomach ache", when she's in a wheelchair ◽️Pfizer used data for FDA approval that does not match Maddie's adverse events reported in senate testimony for EUA approval and liability protection ◽️ According to Maddie's mother, The FDA approved Pfizer's mRNA covid vaccine for children when Maddie was in hospital from ADEs associated to the mRNA covid product she took in that clinical trial ◽️Pfizer emphasised relative risk as opposed to absolute risk for efficacy and marketing of the effectiveness of their product ◽️For Pfizer in terms of Absolute Risk (not relative risk), there was no Statistically Significant benefit to the prevention of people catching covid for the mRNA vaccinated group ◽️ Pfizer Admitted the NEVER TESTED the vaccine on whether it can prevent TRANSMISSION ◽️ Israeli research found men that were vaccinated had decreased sperm counts ◽️According to RFK, Pfizer had 2 x labels for the same product. The EUA product was available, but the licensed version of the same product was “unavailable” ◽️Pfizer and the FDA tried to withhold the clinical trial evidence for 75 years ◽️ Dr Dr Aseem Malhotra mentioned that Re analysis of the Pfizer data shows an adverse event rate of 1/800 ◽️ An Australian FOI revealed the TGA Bioaccumulation studies that show mRNA Lipid Nano Particles are distributed THROUGHOUT the body ◽️ In similar data, the implantation loss of the mice tested more than doubled in the mRNA group ◽️ Myocarditis is a recognised side effect from governments globally ◽️ Several studies have shown (one done in Israel) Myocarditis only occurs in the vaccinated ◽️Albert Bourla said “MRNA had never delivered a single product” and that Pfizer had less experience with” and that Pfizer and BioNTech were working on mRNA for FLU vaccines from 2018 ◽️ Albert Bourla, when asked on 2 x separate occasions whether he’d taken his own vaccine product, said “NO”, he didn't want to "cut the line" ◽️According to Dr Aseem Malhotra, Pfizer paid front groups to push for Vaccine mandates ◽️Pfizer had special mRNA vaccine batches for their employees according to Pfizer's own spokespeople in Australian Senate testimony ◽️South Africa court released documents revealed Pfizer asked governments to set up insurance scheme for adverse outcomes ◽️Pfizer admitted in the South African court documents that the “long term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known” ◽️Trial data used for assessing pregnancy safety was analysed by researchers that owned stocks in the company that made the product they were evaluating ◽️According to RFK, Pfizer needed to get it recommended to children for liability protection ◽️Kevin McKernan has found DNA CONTAMINATION IN PFIZER - Multiple studies confirm ◽️@P_J_Buckhaults has found DNA contamination ◽️DNA contamination confirmed in Australian Pfizer & Moderna Vials. DNA contamination in Pfizer was over 350 times above per dose limits set by the TGA ◽️Dr. David Martin mentioned that Pfizer admitted their product is experimental gene therapy in filings ◽️Pfizer did not seek approval through Gene Therapy regulations in Australia (Gillespie) ◽Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. mentioned "Trans-placental exposure" of newborns to Pfizer's product ◽️"The miscarriage rate was 80% in the Pfizer trials" ◽️The Pfizer mRNA vaccine is based on a spike protein that strong evidence suggests was a man made virus, potentially done with GOF research ◽️According to the James Okeefe Veritas Whistleblower story, a Pfizer Director stated Pfizer are talking about “Mutating covid viruses” ◽️Dr Peter McCullough, one of the most published Cardiologists, has analyzed all the data and said that Pfizer “should never have been approved” What else is there to add to this list of EVIDENCE? The discovery process for this new Kansas lawsuit against Pfizer is sure to be EPIC

Humanspective

476,233 views • 2 years ago

"After 30 years of selling breast implants, there were zero clinical trials and epidemiological studies that were published. Zero. A million women had breast implants. Zero published epidemiological or clinical studies. So in 1991, the FDA finally required implant companies to submit safety data. Women with breast implants were twice as likely to die from brain cancer and three times as likely to die from lung cancer. Other government studies have found silicone in women's lymph nodes under their arms, and from there it can travel to other organs throughout their body, including their brains and their lungs. When the implant makers presented their data to the FDA just a few months ago, those studies just disappeared." President of the US National Center for Health Research Diana Zuckerman, 2005

"After 30 years of selling breast implants, there were zero clinical trials and epidemiological studies that were published. Zero. A million women had breast implants. Zero published epidemiological or clinical studies. So in 1991, the FDA finally required implant companies to submit safety data. Women with breast implants were twice as likely to die from brain cancer and three times as likely to die from lung cancer. Other government studies have found silicone in women's lymph nodes under their arms, and from there it can travel to other organs throughout their body, including their brains and their lungs. When the implant makers presented their data to the FDA just a few months ago, those studies just disappeared." President of the US National Center for Health Research Diana Zuckerman, 2005

Genevieve Gluck

54,978 views • 3 years ago

FDA Quietly Confirms COVID Vaccine Linked to Heart Damage in Young Males After years of denial, the FDA has updated its warning label—admitting the COVID vaccine can cause myocarditis, particularly in young males. Key findings from their study: - Persistent abnormal cardiac MRI findings (evidence of heart injury) were common, even months after vaccination. - The study only followed patients for ~5 months—what about long-term effects? Heart muscle cells do not regenerate. - The FDA downplays it, saying the "clinical significance is unknown." But we know: heart damage is serious. The real scandal? - These risks were flagged in early trials but ignored. - Healthy 12-24-year-olds were put at risk—what about those with pre-existing conditions? - Where’s the accountability for those who silenced warnings? This isn’t just a footnote—it’s a betrayal.

FDA Quietly Confirms COVID Vaccine Linked to Heart Damage in Young Males After years of denial, the FDA has updated its warning label—admitting the COVID vaccine can cause myocarditis, particularly in young males. Key findings from their study: - Persistent abnormal cardiac MRI findings (evidence of heart injury) were common, even months after vaccination. - The study only followed patients for ~5 months—what about long-term effects? Heart muscle cells do not regenerate. - The FDA downplays it, saying the "clinical significance is unknown." But we know: heart damage is serious. The real scandal? - These risks were flagged in early trials but ignored. - Healthy 12-24-year-olds were put at risk—what about those with pre-existing conditions? - Where’s the accountability for those who silenced warnings? This isn’t just a footnote—it’s a betrayal.

Camus

71,809 views • 1 year ago

Our study has just been published in Menopause journal which is a peer reviewed academic journal. This study is based in clinical data from over 1,500 women who were perimenopausal or menopausal. It showed that absorption of oestradiol through the skin through a patch or gel really varies with around a quarter of women requiring higher doses of oestradiol to absorb adequate amounts through their skin. Almost one in three women using standard doses of oestradiol had low levels of oestradiol in their blood. There has been so much confusion in recent months about doses of oestradiol which has led to many women being told to reduce their dose or even stop HRT. However this study highlights the importance of having the right dose for the right person as absorption can really vary between women. Some women need higher and off-label doses of oestradiol to absorb thr same amounts as other women using lower doses. Menopause Journal

Our study has just been published in Menopause journal which is a peer reviewed academic journal. This study is based in clinical data from over 1,500 women who were perimenopausal or menopausal. It showed that absorption of oestradiol through the skin through a patch or gel really varies with around a quarter of women requiring higher doses of oestradiol to absorb adequate amounts through their skin. Almost one in three women using standard doses of oestradiol had low levels of oestradiol in their blood. There has been so much confusion in recent months about doses of oestradiol which has led to many women being told to reduce their dose or even stop HRT. However this study highlights the importance of having the right dose for the right person as absorption can really vary between women. Some women need higher and off-label doses of oestradiol to absorb thr same amounts as other women using lower doses. Menopause Journal

Dr Louise Newson

17,170 views • 1 year ago

The Dark Secrets Of Johnson & Johnson...One Of The World’s Most Admired Corporations Is Also Its Deadliest Criminal Enterprise. Gardiner Harris J & J Targeted Nursing Homes To Use Antipsychotic Medications As 'Chemical Restraints' While Knowing Full Well It Would Kill Millions. 1 in 5 nursing home residents are prescribed an antipsychotic medication as 'off label' for use as a 'chemical restraint.' Keeping nursing home residents quiet benefits the facility. Antipsychotics like Johnson & Johnson's Risperdal are given to patients with dementia, often without informed consent, to control & sedate behavior. Risperdal is an antipsychotic medication used in the treatment of bipolar disorder & schizophrenia that Johnson & Johnson claimed had fewer side effects than its older antipsychotic, Haldol. Johnson & Johnson illegally marketed the use of Risperdal to elderly patients with dementia. Risperdal led to strokes, pneumonia, heart attacks & death. Risperdal & many other antipsychotic medications should never be used on patients with dementia. These antipsychotics are for specific diagnostics only...Schizophrenia & Bipolar. The package insert of Risperdal displays the harshest warning known as 'the black box warning' which is the most severe warning on a drug label: RISPERDAL® is not approved for use in patients with dementia-related psychosis. WARNING: INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA RELATED PSYCHOSIS Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Analyses of 17 placebo-controlled trials (modal duration of 10 weeks), largely in patients taking atypical antipsychotic drugs, revealed a risk of death in drug-treated patients of between 1.6 to 1.7 times the risk of death in placebo-treated patients. The deaths were cardiovascular (e.g., heart failure, stroke, sudden death) or infectious (e.g., pneumonia) in nature. Yet, despite the black box warnings added in 2005, nursing home residents are still given antipsychotics everyday as part of their polypharmacy 'medication cocktail' to keep them sedated & compliant. Drug manufacturers need to be held accountable for marketing drugs for uses that are known to be dangerous. Nursing facility staff need training & sufficient staffing to manage behaviors without resorting to drugging patients. 👇Risperdal Package Insert👇 👇No More Tears: The Dark Secrets Of J & J👇 👇The History Of Risperdal Warnings👇 Speaker: Gardiner Harris Podcast: Dr. Josh Axe

The Dark Secrets Of Johnson & Johnson...One Of The World’s Most Admired Corporations Is Also Its Deadliest Criminal Enterprise. Gardiner Harris J & J Targeted Nursing Homes To Use Antipsychotic Medications As 'Chemical Restraints' While Knowing Full Well It Would Kill Millions. 1 in 5 nursing home residents are prescribed an antipsychotic medication as 'off label' for use as a 'chemical restraint.' Keeping nursing home residents quiet benefits the facility. Antipsychotics like Johnson & Johnson's Risperdal are given to patients with dementia, often without informed consent, to control & sedate behavior. Risperdal is an antipsychotic medication used in the treatment of bipolar disorder & schizophrenia that Johnson & Johnson claimed had fewer side effects than its older antipsychotic, Haldol. Johnson & Johnson illegally marketed the use of Risperdal to elderly patients with dementia. Risperdal led to strokes, pneumonia, heart attacks & death. Risperdal & many other antipsychotic medications should never be used on patients with dementia. These antipsychotics are for specific diagnostics only...Schizophrenia & Bipolar. The package insert of Risperdal displays the harshest warning known as 'the black box warning' which is the most severe warning on a drug label: RISPERDAL® is not approved for use in patients with dementia-related psychosis. WARNING: INCREASED MORTALITY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH DEMENTIA RELATED PSYCHOSIS Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Analyses of 17 placebo-controlled trials (modal duration of 10 weeks), largely in patients taking atypical antipsychotic drugs, revealed a risk of death in drug-treated patients of between 1.6 to 1.7 times the risk of death in placebo-treated patients. The deaths were cardiovascular (e.g., heart failure, stroke, sudden death) or infectious (e.g., pneumonia) in nature. Yet, despite the black box warnings added in 2005, nursing home residents are still given antipsychotics everyday as part of their polypharmacy 'medication cocktail' to keep them sedated & compliant. Drug manufacturers need to be held accountable for marketing drugs for uses that are known to be dangerous. Nursing facility staff need training & sufficient staffing to manage behaviors without resorting to drugging patients. 👇Risperdal Package Insert👇 👇No More Tears: The Dark Secrets Of J & J👇 👇The History Of Risperdal Warnings👇 Speaker: Gardiner Harris Podcast: Dr. Josh Axe

Valerie Anne Smith

40,457 views • 1 year ago

It’s been more than 20 years since media headlines about the Women’s Health Initiative study incorrectly linked HRT to an increased risk of breast cancer, but even today many women still avoid HRT because of perceived breast cancer fears. This misinformation is really damaging to women’s health, so on my podcast this week I invited Dr Avrum Bluming to join me. Avrum is a leading US oncologist and has spent 25 years studying the benefits and risks of HRT in breast cancer survivors. As you’ll hear in the episode, Avrum tells me about more recent studies that have shown that oestrogen alone decreases the risk of breast cancer development by 23% and the risk of death from breast cancer by 40%. Yet many people still do not realise this. It is so important that everyone knows the real story about the WHI study and the misreporting of the data so I really would recommend listening to the full episode:

It’s been more than 20 years since media headlines about the Women’s Health Initiative study incorrectly linked HRT to an increased risk of breast cancer, but even today many women still avoid HRT because of perceived breast cancer fears. This misinformation is really damaging to women’s health, so on my podcast this week I invited Dr Avrum Bluming to join me. Avrum is a leading US oncologist and has spent 25 years studying the benefits and risks of HRT in breast cancer survivors. As you’ll hear in the episode, Avrum tells me about more recent studies that have shown that oestrogen alone decreases the risk of breast cancer development by 23% and the risk of death from breast cancer by 40%. Yet many people still do not realise this. It is so important that everyone knows the real story about the WHI study and the misreporting of the data so I really would recommend listening to the full episode:

Dr Louise Newson

40,567 views • 2 years ago

You may have seen the headlines this morning with yet another paper showing that women who have an earlier menopause are at a higher risk of dementia. This is something we have known for decades now and it’s because oestradiol has protective effects all around the body - including the brain - so when a women has an earlier menopause, she is without her hormones for a longer period of time which leads to this increased risk. The paper I am discussing here talks more about the science behind this and I would really recommend you all read it. I will share a link in my story now. It is crucial we do more research in this area and allow more women to have access to hormones if that is what they want.

You may have seen the headlines this morning with yet another paper showing that women who have an earlier menopause are at a higher risk of dementia. This is something we have known for decades now and it’s because oestradiol has protective effects all around the body - including the brain - so when a women has an earlier menopause, she is without her hormones for a longer period of time which leads to this increased risk. The paper I am discussing here talks more about the science behind this and I would really recommend you all read it. I will share a link in my story now. It is crucial we do more research in this area and allow more women to have access to hormones if that is what they want.

Dr Louise Newson

49,948 views • 2 years ago