正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Pit stop challenge: Yamaha Factory Racing Team vs YART 🥊 Same race. Same pressure. One timer ⏱️ You won’t believe the result 🤯 #YamahaRacing #Suzuka8Hours #FIMEWC

39,027 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 THE BIGGEST LIE IN MODERN HITTING. We’ve become a game of clones. Everyone wants the same launch angle, the same hand path, and the same “aesthetic” finish. But here is the reality: If you’re coaching every kid to move the same way, you aren’t coaching—you’re just copying and pasting. 🧩 Feel vs. Real The truth is found in who can decipher the feel vs. real for every individual player. • What a coach sees on camera (Real) is almost never what the athlete is experiencing (Feel). • If you tell a hitter to “get on plane” and they start dumping their barrels, your “correct” advice just broke their swing. 🧬 Different Bodies, Different Movements Everyone is built differently. One hitter has long levers and tight hips; another is short, explosive, and hyper-mobile. Everyone moves differently. So why on earth are we buying into ONE rigid swing philosophy? Unless that philosophy is the one that allows you to get the only intended result that matters: CONSISTENT BARRELS. 🎯 The Bottom Line Stop trying to win the “Best Looking Swing” award on Instagram. If your swing is “ugly” but you’re a barrel machine, you’re a better hitter than the kid with the “perfect” mechanics who can’t touch a high-spin heater. We need to stop chasing positions and start chasing intent. If the “feel” creates the “result,” keep it. Everything else is just noise. Stop cloning. Start competing. If you want to build a swing that is for for you, sign up for a 1:1 coaching call. DM us here.

Tyler Osik

15,394 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨🎙️ARTETA STUNS FANS WITH HONEST VINÍCIUS VERDICT: “WE NEVER FELT WE NEEDED TO SIGN HIM —MARTINELLI IS ON THE SAME LEVEL WITH VINI.” “A lot of people will probably be surprised by this, but we never reached a point where we felt signing Vinícius Júnior was something we absolutely had to do. Of course, he’s an exceptional footballer. He’s one of the best wingers in world football, and nobody at this club would deny his quality. But when you’re building a team, you don’t just look at names—you look at balance, chemistry, profiles and, most importantly, the players you already believe in.” “We sat down, assessed every possible scenario and weighed up the situation carefully. In the end, we kept coming back to one thing: Gabriel Martinelli. We already have a player with explosive pace, directness, courage in one-vs-one situations and the mentality to keep improving every single season. Internally, we have enormous confidence in him. I genuinely believe Gabriel can perform at the same level, and that’s why there was never a feeling of panic or urgency.” “People always think the answer is to buy the biggest superstar available, but football doesn’t work like that. Sometimes the best decision is trusting the player you’ve already developed. I’m not losing a single minute of sleep over not signing Vinícius because I know exactly what Martinelli is capable of. I see him every day in training, I know his character, and I believe his ceiling is incredibly high.” “Our responsibility isn’t to collect the biggest names; it’s to build the strongest team. We believe Gabriel Martinelli is a massive part of that project, and our confidence in him has never changed.”

MatchReport

106,225 次观看 • 25 天前

a moonshot engineer leaked the benchmark anthropic, openai and xai all buried the same week: kimi k3 beat opus 5, gpt-5.6 and grok 4.6 at $0.94 a task. stop paying anthropic $200 a month for opus 5 and openai $200 for gpt-5.6 when kimi does the same work for $8 the leak showed kimi k3 winning 9 of 12 categories against opus 5, gpt-5.6 and grok 4.6. within 48 hours all three labs quietly pushed pricing pages and one very specific comparison chart off their sites. nobody announced anything. they just deleted, which tells you everything the four numbers they scrubbed: cost per task · $0.94 vs $1.80 -> opus 5 charges $1.80 to finish one task. gpt-5.6 $1.04. grok 4.6 $0.61. kimi k3 $0.94 and it landed 487 of 500 clean -> anthropic is billing you double for a model that lost the benchmark it paid to promote the weights · free, sitting on huggingface right now -> the entire model is a public download. pull it, keep it, run it forever, nobody can switch it off -> a model you can hold cannot be rented at $200 a month. that single fact is what three labs deleted a chart over the switch · one line of bash -> moonshot ships an anthropic-compatible endpoint. one env variable and claude code points at kimi -> same cli, same keybindings, same /model. you change a url, opus 5 never knows it lost the seat the bill · $400 down to $8 -> opus 5 max plus gpt-5.6 pro is $400 a month. kimi runs the same daily work for $8 metered -> that is a 98% cut for output that beat both of them 9 categories to 3 here is the part they will fight me on: the frontier tax died the week this leaked and all three labs know it. once the weights are public the price has a ceiling, because anyone can serve the same model. anthropic, openai and xai are charging 2025 prices on a lead that ended in a benchmark they deleted instead of answered drop your $400/mo ai stack to $8. the run above is kimi k3 finishing the task opus 5 bills $1.80 for. the full breakdown is in the article below

starmex

32,547 次观看 • 11 天前

jane street pays $400k to traders who do this one thing top polymarket quants use the same method stop trading the moment calibration breaks brier score tells you exactly when formula: sum of (predicted_probability - actual_outcome)² perfect prediction = 0.00 random guessing = 0.25 citadel tests this in interviews top polymarket traders check it after every 50 trades why this matters on wall street you can have 70% win rate and still be badly calibrated example: you say 90% confidence on 10 trades if only 6 win, you're overconfident your 90% was actually 60% brier score exposes this immediately quant firms fire traders who can't calibrate top 20 polymarket traders do the same they track predicted probability vs actual outcomes when brier score starts rising, they stop trading not because they're scared because the math says their edge disappeared the discipline that matters imagine making $5k in a week then your brier score jumps from 0.12 to 0.19 quants walk away amateurs keep trading and give it all back why most traders ignore this tracking brier scores feels like extra work you already know if you won or lost, right? wrong winning with bad calibration means you got lucky losing with good calibration means you got unlucky only brier score tells you which is which the actual edge it's not about being right it's about knowing when you're wrong the moment your predictions stop matching reality, you stop betting quants built systems to measure their own accuracy not just their profit

ramper

103,208 次观看 • 5 个月前