Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Pretty amazing that we can now implement swipeable Tabs with native CSS. Updating the React Aria demo I made a few years ago to use native scroll snapping, scroll timeline, and anchor positioning instead of Framer Motion. Feels smooooooth! 🎉

Devon Govett

39,839 subscribers

83,922 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Been checking out Expo's new headless <Tabs /> (again! 😎) and finally got to dig into some CSS transitions with Software Mansion's react-native-reanimated v4 🚀 Tab bar smoothly disappears/reappears as you scroll. Subtle animations and haptics. Feels pretty sweet!

Been checking out Expo's new headless <Tabs /> (again! 😎) and finally got to dig into some CSS transitions with Software Mansion's react-native-reanimated v4 🚀 Tab bar smoothly disappears/reappears as you scroll. Subtle animations and haptics. Feels pretty sweet!

Jacob Clausen

33,633 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I'm 9 years old and I wrote a blog post about the hook I use to build this scroll direction based animation from Gmail app ✦ Built for React Native using Expo ✦ Powered by Software Mansion reanimated ✦ Blog post at

I'm 9 years old and I wrote a blog post about the hook I use to build this scroll direction based animation from Gmail app ✦ Built for React Native using Expo ✦ Powered by Software Mansion reanimated ✦ Blog post at

Volodymyr

24,579 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Native iOS split view is coming to React Navigation 🔜 Powered by React Native Screens 🫶 Let us know your use cases so we can test and ensure that the API is suitable for a wide range of usage 👇

Native iOS split view is coming to React Navigation 🔜 Powered by React Native Screens 🫶 Let us know your use cases so we can test and ensure that the API is suitable for a wide range of usage 👇

React Navigation

12,374 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Looks like we can place UIKit views in the accessory view! 🚀 Here is a small demo of iOS 26 accessory view running with React Native Bottom Tabs 🔥 Time to think about a good API for this 😄

Looks like we can place UIKit views in the accessory view! 🚀 Here is a small demo of iOS 26 accessory view running with React Native Bottom Tabs 🔥 Time to think about a good API for this 😄

Oskar

18,361 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WishList Update: We finished our implementation of the platform-native Scroll View component and can now use smooth scrolling and bounce events - awesome work Janic! ⛹️‍♂️ Just a little bit of fine-tuning and we'll be able to launch WishList this summer. Stay tuned! 👀🚀

WishList Update: We finished our implementation of the platform-native Scroll View component and can now use smooth scrolling and bounce events - awesome work Janic! ⛹️‍♂️ Just a little bit of fine-tuning and we'll be able to launch WishList this summer. Stay tuned! 👀🚀

Margelo

15,765 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

I've been playing around with Spline new video texture and I tried to combine it with Framer latest scroll transform interaction, here's the result! For someone who knows almost nothing about 3D and can't write a single line of code that is pretty cool huh? 🚀

I've been playing around with Spline new video texture and I tried to combine it with Framer latest scroll transform interaction, here's the result! For someone who knows almost nothing about 3D and can't write a single line of code that is pretty cool huh? 🚀

Matt

48,249 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Scroll-triggered animations are coming to Chrome early next year (and we've been really excited about this one for a bit!) 🥳 Unlike scroll-driven animations (already in Chrome & Safari), this API introduces "timeline-trigger" and "animation-trigger" to start an animation within a specific range, rather than relying on the scroller completion *as* the animation timeline. I got nerd-sniped and wanted to try it out so I built this shape morphing demo to show how you can apply multiple animations to the same element over with different triggers. PRETTY COOL IMO! Bramus has a post with more info ⬇️

Scroll-triggered animations are coming to Chrome early next year (and we've been really excited about this one for a bit!) 🥳 Unlike scroll-driven animations (already in Chrome & Safari), this API introduces "timeline-trigger" and "animation-trigger" to start an animation within a specific range, rather than relying on the scroller completion as the animation timeline. I got nerd-sniped and wanted to try it out so I built this shape morphing demo to show how you can apply multiple animations to the same element over with different triggers. PRETTY COOL IMO! Bramus has a post with more info ⬇️

Una 🇺🇦

38,727 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

My app Grounded was built with screen-transitions v3.4-beta 1, and instead of another changelog, I thought I'd do a tutorial on how to recreate this Apple Store style hero card animation using the new .navigation.zoom() API. heres how we can achieve something similar in react native

My app Grounded was built with screen-transitions v3.4-beta 1, and instead of another changelog, I thought I'd do a tutorial on how to recreate this Apple Store style hero card animation using the new .navigation.zoom() API. heres how we can achieve something similar in react native

Ed

14,157 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

THIS SITE COST AROUND $12 IN CREDITS TO BUILD. STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THE SAME THING. What's on screen isn't a basic landing page. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in one agentic session with Claude Code + Higgsfield. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → 6 cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question won't go away: did Claude really assemble all of this in a single pass? For boutique studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What it normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between them → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part studios and their clients won't enjoy hearing. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Delivery cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → a single session One operator can now run all six systems in one pass and ship a working site - without touching a frame extractor or writing a CSS keyframe by hand. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

THIS SITE COST AROUND $12 IN CREDITS TO BUILD. STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THE SAME THING. What's on screen isn't a basic landing page. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in one agentic session with Claude Code + Higgsfield. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → 6 cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question won't go away: did Claude really assemble all of this in a single pass? For boutique studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What it normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between them → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part studios and their clients won't enjoy hearing. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Delivery cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → a single session One operator can now run all six systems in one pass and ship a working site - without touching a frame extractor or writing a CSS keyframe by hand. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

ZEUS⚡️

477,187 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A SOLO CREATOR JUST SHIPPED A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE IN ONE WEEKEND - WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD, FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION. What you're looking at isn't a template. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in a single agentic session. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - not a single hand-coded keyframe → 6 cinematic effects baked in with zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question keeps surfacing: a person didn't build this by hand… did they? For studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What this normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between all three → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part the agency won't put in its pitch deck. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Your cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → one session One operator now runs all six systems in a single pass and ships a working site - without opening a frame extractor or writing one CSS keyframe. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

A SOLO CREATOR JUST SHIPPED A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE IN ONE WEEKEND - WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD, FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION. What you're looking at isn't a template. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in a single agentic session. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - not a single hand-coded keyframe → 6 cinematic effects baked in with zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question keeps surfacing: a person didn't build this by hand… did they? For studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What this normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between all three → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part the agency won't put in its pitch deck. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Your cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → one session One operator now runs all six systems in a single pass and ships a working site - without opening a frame extractor or writing one CSS keyframe. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

ZEUS⚡️

21,598 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

i wrote Close To You seven years ago and we made a demo that i posted 20 seconds of and you somehow cared about it enough for us to revisit the song seven years later. Close To You was not initially a part of TSOU — it’s from a different time entirely

i wrote Close To You seven years ago and we made a demo that i posted 20 seconds of and you somehow cared about it enough for us to revisit the song seven years later. Close To You was not initially a part of TSOU — it’s from a different time entirely

Gracie Abrams

514,682 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Replit, Vercel, and OpenAI have built very cool agent-native applications, but nobody else has passed the demo stage. Building agents that work is complex. Teams aren't shipping agents because we don't have good tooling yet (and most of us don't know how to do this well.) A couple of days ago, the CopilotKit🪁 team announced a collaboration with . You can now use LangGraph with CoAgents to build agent-native applications, and here is everything you need to know about that: CoAgents is fully open-source, and you can use it to do the following: • Human-in-the-loop to steer and correct the agent • Stream intermediate agent state • Real-time state sharing between the agent and the application • Agentic generative UI to build trust that the agent is on the right path Start this GitHub Repository: Thanks to the team for giving me early access and collaborating with me on this post.

Replit, Vercel, and OpenAI have built very cool agent-native applications, but nobody else has passed the demo stage. Building agents that work is complex. Teams aren't shipping agents because we don't have good tooling yet (and most of us don't know how to do this well.) A couple of days ago, the CopilotKit🪁 team announced a collaboration with . You can now use LangGraph with CoAgents to build agent-native applications, and here is everything you need to know about that: CoAgents is fully open-source, and you can use it to do the following: • Human-in-the-loop to steer and correct the agent • Stream intermediate agent state • Real-time state sharing between the agent and the application • Agentic generative UI to build trust that the agent is on the right path Start this GitHub Repository: Thanks to the team for giving me early access and collaborating with me on this post.

Santiago

63,073 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THIS WEBSITE. A FULLY ANIMATED, SCROLL-DRIVEN BUILD - CINEMATIC CLIPS, FILM GRAIN, GLASS CARDS - SHIPPED IN ONE SESSION FOR $12. Scroll it and one question won't leave: did an AI really assemble all of this in a single pass? For studios quoting $35,000 and billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. Here's what the page actually runs: → Motion clips generated from 30+ models - not stock, not hand-shot → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → Six cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing What that used to require: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs → Six systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It justified the invoice. It just collapsed into Claude Code + Higgsfield running in one pass. The gap nobody wants to say out loud: → Agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Real cost now: a Claude sub + a few dollars of credits → Timeline: weeks → a single session Follow me + reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THIS WEBSITE. A FULLY ANIMATED, SCROLL-DRIVEN BUILD - CINEMATIC CLIPS, FILM GRAIN, GLASS CARDS - SHIPPED IN ONE SESSION FOR $12. Scroll it and one question won't leave: did an AI really assemble all of this in a single pass? For studios quoting $35,000 and billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. Here's what the page actually runs: → Motion clips generated from 30+ models - not stock, not hand-shot → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → Six cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing What that used to require: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs → Six systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It justified the invoice. It just collapsed into Claude Code + Higgsfield running in one pass. The gap nobody wants to say out loud: → Agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Real cost now: a Claude sub + a few dollars of credits → Timeline: weeks → a single session Follow me + reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

56,569 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

i'm too stubborn to simply give up on the concept of Benji after almost 10 years(!!) of iterating on it with different stacks... 2018: graphql backend + react SPA 2019: made a react native app for 6 months 2020: gave up on it and wrote 3 years of using other bs tools and being grumpy about them 2023: rewrote it in blitz js (JUGE mistake) 2024: iterate on react native + PWA + RN pwa wrapper 2025: time for a rewrite to Zero To Shipped ⛴️ stack (but next js sucks for this kind of app, add api, mcp, cross platform app, and many other things 2026: i want it all actions INSTANT AND FAST AF and next js is the wrong tech choice for a mostly client app, so i'm starting a rewrite with TANSTACK + Convex + Better Auth it feels so snappy 😭 btw 99% of the customers abandoned it, there are like 3 ride or die fans but i know i can turn it around!!!! let /goal cook.

i'm too stubborn to simply give up on the concept of Benji after almost 10 years(!!) of iterating on it with different stacks... 2018: graphql backend + react SPA 2019: made a react native app for 6 months 2020: gave up on it and wrote 3 years of using other bs tools and being grumpy about them 2023: rewrote it in blitz js (JUGE mistake) 2024: iterate on react native + PWA + RN pwa wrapper 2025: time for a rewrite to Zero To Shipped ⛴️ stack (but next js sucks for this kind of app, add api, mcp, cross platform app, and many other things 2026: i want it all actions INSTANT AND FAST AF and next js is the wrong tech choice for a mostly client app, so i'm starting a rewrite with TANSTACK + Convex + Better Auth it feels so snappy 😭 btw 99% of the customers abandoned it, there are like 3 ride or die fans but i know i can turn it around!!!! let /goal cook.

kitze · supermac.io 🐦‍🔥

16,580 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Fable 5 just dropped and someone already built a $10k-looking website with it. Here's the full workflow The smooth scrolling, the animations, the transitions, all built with Fable 5. Here's how to get the same result instead of a generic template. 1. Steal a direction first. Go to Mobbin or Godly and find a site whose feel you love. Screenshot it. Fable copies a vibe far better than it invents one. 2. Grab real components. Pull animation-ready blocks from Aceternity UI or Magic UI. These are built for exactly this look (scroll reveals, parallax, gradients). 3. Prompt Fable with all of it. Switch to Fable 5 in Claude Code, drop in your screenshots and the component references, and describe the sections and scroll behavior you want. Let it plan before it builds. 4. Animate with the right tools. Tell it to use GSAP with ScrollTrigger for scroll effects, or Framer Motion for React. This is what separates "nice" from "$10k." 5. Iterate on feel, not code. Preview it, then give Fable specific notes ("slower fade, more spacing on mobile") until it lands. Bookmark this

Fable 5 just dropped and someone already built a $10k-looking website with it. Here's the full workflow The smooth scrolling, the animations, the transitions, all built with Fable 5. Here's how to get the same result instead of a generic template. 1. Steal a direction first. Go to Mobbin or Godly and find a site whose feel you love. Screenshot it. Fable copies a vibe far better than it invents one. 2. Grab real components. Pull animation-ready blocks from Aceternity UI or Magic UI. These are built for exactly this look (scroll reveals, parallax, gradients). 3. Prompt Fable with all of it. Switch to Fable 5 in Claude Code, drop in your screenshots and the component references, and describe the sections and scroll behavior you want. Let it plan before it builds. 4. Animate with the right tools. Tell it to use GSAP with ScrollTrigger for scroll effects, or Framer Motion for React. This is what separates "nice" from "$10k." 5. Iterate on feel, not code. Preview it, then give Fable specific notes ("slower fade, more spacing on mobile") until it lands. Bookmark this

Fokki

72,175 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

THIS GUY JUST REBUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE FOR $12. IF YOU RUN A WEB STUDIO, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY KEEP SCROLLING. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is selling you five departments wearing one invoice. Here’s each one - collapsed into a single agentic session. LAYER 1 - THE CONCEPT ROOM (Claude) Reads the brief, pulls references, and scripts the scroll: what the visitor feels at second 3, second 15, second 40. → Used to be a strategist and a wall of mood boards. Now it’s a conversation. LAYER 2 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops - all matched to the story from Layer 1. → Used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it’s a prompt. LAYER 3 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. LAYER 4 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects, zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. LAYER 5 - THE QA PASS (Claude) Checks load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - then rewrites whatever doesn’t. → Used to be a client call and a revision cycle. Now it’s one more turn in the same session. Five departments. One operator. One pass. A strategist, a motion artist, a developer, a designer, and a QA lead - weeks of handoffs - now run in a single session. For a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never selling talent. It was selling overhead. And the overhead just became five layers. Follow me, reply “website” to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

THIS GUY JUST REBUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE FOR $12. IF YOU RUN A WEB STUDIO, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY KEEP SCROLLING. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is selling you five departments wearing one invoice. Here’s each one - collapsed into a single agentic session. LAYER 1 - THE CONCEPT ROOM (Claude) Reads the brief, pulls references, and scripts the scroll: what the visitor feels at second 3, second 15, second 40. → Used to be a strategist and a wall of mood boards. Now it’s a conversation. LAYER 2 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops - all matched to the story from Layer 1. → Used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it’s a prompt. LAYER 3 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. LAYER 4 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects, zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. LAYER 5 - THE QA PASS (Claude) Checks load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - then rewrites whatever doesn’t. → Used to be a client call and a revision cycle. Now it’s one more turn in the same session. Five departments. One operator. One pass. A strategist, a motion artist, a developer, a designer, and a QA lead - weeks of handoffs - now run in a single session. For a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never selling talent. It was selling overhead. And the overhead just became five layers. Follow me, reply “website” to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

134,166 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

SplitPaneKit This is something I've wanted to componentize for a while. We've seen this pattern appear in a few apps now, I even use it at Abode. It has a couple "gotcha" moments with performance and optimisation while animating separate or child views with the drag and translation of the split views, handling breakpoints etc, I thought I'd put it into a nice package. I actually made quite a few optimisations from how I handle this with Abode in this package. So might need to implement it over there😅 As before, right now its UIKit only, but SwiftUI host will likely come over the next few days as I make improvements and final changes to the initial API from feedback. - Draggable split-pane interface - Custom breakpoints or built-in presets - Scroll view integration - drag from content or handle - Coordinated animations with pan-effecting views - UIKit

SplitPaneKit This is something I've wanted to componentize for a while. We've seen this pattern appear in a few apps now, I even use it at Abode. It has a couple "gotcha" moments with performance and optimisation while animating separate or child views with the drag and translation of the split views, handling breakpoints etc, I thought I'd put it into a nice package. I actually made quite a few optimisations from how I handle this with Abode in this package. So might need to implement it over there😅 As before, right now its UIKit only, but SwiftUI host will likely come over the next few days as I make improvements and final changes to the initial API from feedback. - Draggable split-pane interface - Custom breakpoints or built-in presets - Scroll view integration - drag from content or handle - Coordinated animations with pan-effecting views - UIKit

Joseph Smith

23,552 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A WEB STUDIO CHARGES $35,000 FOR AN ANIMATED SITE. THE SAME BUILD NOW COSTS $12 - CLAUDE CODE WRITES, HIGGSFIELD RENDERS. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is just three departments. Here's each one, collapsed into a single agentic session. SYSTEM 1 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips pulled from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops. → This used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it's a prompt. SYSTEM 2 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. SYSTEM 3 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. Three departments. One operator. One pass. What used to take a designer, a motion artist, and a developer through weeks of handoffs now runs in a single session - for a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never the talent. It was the overhead. And the overhead just became three systems. Reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

A WEB STUDIO CHARGES $35,000 FOR AN ANIMATED SITE. THE SAME BUILD NOW COSTS $12 - CLAUDE CODE WRITES, HIGGSFIELD RENDERS. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is just three departments. Here's each one, collapsed into a single agentic session. SYSTEM 1 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips pulled from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops. → This used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it's a prompt. SYSTEM 2 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. SYSTEM 3 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. Three departments. One operator. One pass. What used to take a designer, a motion artist, and a developer through weeks of handoffs now runs in a single session - for a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never the talent. It was the overhead. And the overhead just became three systems. Reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

172,590 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD CAN BUILD A $35,000 ANIMATED WEBSITE. IN ONE AGENTIC SESSION. FOR ~$12 IN CREDITS. stop paying a web studio $6,000-$35,000. stop wiring GSAP, Lenis, and frame extraction by hand. Claude Code writes it. Higgsfield renders it. WHAT THE BUILD PRODUCES: → a fully animated, scroll-driven site → cinematic motion clips from 30+ generative models → GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines - zero hand-coded keyframes → Lenis smooth-scroll, tuned pacing → automated frame extraction + asset optimization → six cinematic effects baked in: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing → responsive layout + copy THE STACK: → Claude Code - concept, scaffolding, scroll code, QA → Higgsfield (MCP) - hero clips, transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails → GSAP + Lenis - the motion layer, written for you CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: mcp_servers: higgsfield: url: " one OAuth flow. done. now Claude can generate and pull clips directly - no manual exporting. WHAT TO PROMPT: concept + scroll: "read this brief, script the scroll - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. scaffold the site with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." motion assets: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section from the story. 3–5s, high-res." polish pass: "bake in film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. no config." QA: "check load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands. rewrite whatever doesn't." WHAT THIS REPLACES: → web studio build: $6,000-$35,000+ → motion artist: $800-2,000/project → front-end dev: $2,000-10,000/project → weeks of handoffs: gone Fable 5 + Higgsfield: a subscription + a few dollars of credits. one session. SETUP IN 10 MINUTES: - install Claude Code - add the Higgsfield MCP + authenticate - drop your brief + references - let it scaffold, generate, and animate in one pass - preview, send fixes in plain English, ship the pipeline was the moat. it just became a prompt. Follow me, comment "WEB" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD CAN BUILD A $35,000 ANIMATED WEBSITE. IN ONE AGENTIC SESSION. FOR ~$12 IN CREDITS. stop paying a web studio $6,000-$35,000. stop wiring GSAP, Lenis, and frame extraction by hand. Claude Code writes it. Higgsfield renders it. WHAT THE BUILD PRODUCES: → a fully animated, scroll-driven site → cinematic motion clips from 30+ generative models → GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines - zero hand-coded keyframes → Lenis smooth-scroll, tuned pacing → automated frame extraction + asset optimization → six cinematic effects baked in: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing → responsive layout + copy THE STACK: → Claude Code - concept, scaffolding, scroll code, QA → Higgsfield (MCP) - hero clips, transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails → GSAP + Lenis - the motion layer, written for you CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: mcp_servers: higgsfield: url: " one OAuth flow. done. now Claude can generate and pull clips directly - no manual exporting. WHAT TO PROMPT: concept + scroll: "read this brief, script the scroll - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. scaffold the site with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." motion assets: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section from the story. 3–5s, high-res." polish pass: "bake in film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. no config." QA: "check load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands. rewrite whatever doesn't." WHAT THIS REPLACES: → web studio build: $6,000-$35,000+ → motion artist: $800-2,000/project → front-end dev: $2,000-10,000/project → weeks of handoffs: gone Fable 5 + Higgsfield: a subscription + a few dollars of credits. one session. SETUP IN 10 MINUTES: - install Claude Code - add the Higgsfield MCP + authenticate - drop your brief + references - let it scaffold, generate, and animate in one pass - preview, send fixes in plain English, ship the pipeline was the moat. it just became a prompt. Follow me, comment "WEB" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

559,161 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

We were never fully satisfied with the animated components available outside. Some looked good but were hard to customize. Some were easy to use but felt too basic. So 2 months ago, we started building our own. It started as a Framer component library. Then we expanded it to Next.js and MCP, so people can use it with code and AI builders too. Now we’re finally launching the beta on July 2, 11 AM IST. Only for the first 500 users. If you’re building animated websites, this will save you a lot of time. And I think you’re going to love this.

We were never fully satisfied with the animated components available outside. Some looked good but were hard to customize. Some were easy to use but felt too basic. So 2 months ago, we started building our own. It started as a Framer component library. Then we expanded it to Next.js and MCP, so people can use it with code and AI builders too. Now we’re finally launching the beta on July 2, 11 AM IST. Only for the first 500 users. If you’re building animated websites, this will save you a lot of time. And I think you’re going to love this.

Praha

44,713 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen