Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Private markets are where investors make truly astronomical returns. Perplexity Computer took this scenario of Peter Thiel putting $500K into Facebook at the seed round and created a detailed model of all of the price changes including dilution. The result? ~$89.2B. That’s over 178,000x across 21 years. Bitcoin who?... show more

Pepe Invests

64,017 subscribers

43,739 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I asked Perplexity Computer one question: “If Nvidia’s AI data center revenue doubles again, map exactly where every incremental dollar flows across the semiconductor supply chain with a chart” It generated this full supply chain chart and video in minutes. It shows exactly who benefits - memory, foundry, packaging, and more. This level of research used to take hours. Now it takes minutes.

I asked Perplexity Computer one question: “If Nvidia’s AI data center revenue doubles again, map exactly where every incremental dollar flows across the semiconductor supply chain with a chart” It generated this full supply chain chart and video in minutes. It shows exactly who benefits - memory, foundry, packaging, and more. This level of research used to take hours. Now it takes minutes.

Venu

101,207 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I just built one of the greatest insider buying tracker tools of all time with Perplexity Computer. I wanted to find out one question: Which stocks actually have a high correlation of share price appreciation and insider buying? What Perplexity Computer built to answer this was truly amazing. Here's what it did: It pulled 1,301 real SEC Form 4 insider purchases across 184 S&P 500 stocks over the last 5 years. Then it tracked what happened to each stock AFTER insiders bought, measuring forward returns, win rates, and purchase frequency. It combined all of that into a single "Alpha Score" that ranks every stock by how reliably it goes up after insiders buy. The results? $COIN: 100% win rate. +187% average return after insider buys. $ET: 100% win rate. 52 purchases. $514M in total insider buying. $VST, $LUV, $CAT, $LLY, all 100% win rates. 73% of ALL insider purchases across the S&P 500 led to share price gains. But it didn't stop there. It also built: - A live purchase feed tracking every new SEC filing - Cluster buy detection (multiple insiders buying the same stock within 14 days) - A sector heatmap showing where insiders are putting their money - Top conviction buys (Berkshire's $2.1B OXY position, Musk's $1B TSLA buy) The whole thing looks like a Bloomberg terminal. Dark theme. Real time data. Fully interactive. I didn't write a single line of code. I just told Perplexity Computer what I wanted, and it researched the data, ran the analysis, and built the entire dashboard from scratch. This is the future of building things with AI. The best part was that it created a proprietary "Alpha Score" for every stock. This was a composite ranking from 0 to 100 that weighs four factors: 1. How often insiders bought (frequency) 2. How much money they put in (total value) 3. What percentage of buys led to gains (win rate) 4. How big those gains were (average forward return) The higher the Alpha Score, the stronger the correlation between insider buying and share price appreciation. It revealed insights you would've never expected. The energy sector ended up having the highest Alpha Score, meaning insiders buying energy stocks is very correlated with energy stocks surging. I have paid for data on insider buying in the past. I literally built a better tool with Perplexity Computer than the insider buying tools I have been using for the last 3 years.

I just built one of the greatest insider buying tracker tools of all time with Perplexity Computer. I wanted to find out one question: Which stocks actually have a high correlation of share price appreciation and insider buying? What Perplexity Computer built to answer this was truly amazing. Here's what it did: It pulled 1,301 real SEC Form 4 insider purchases across 184 S&P 500 stocks over the last 5 years. Then it tracked what happened to each stock AFTER insiders bought, measuring forward returns, win rates, and purchase frequency. It combined all of that into a single "Alpha Score" that ranks every stock by how reliably it goes up after insiders buy. The results? $COIN: 100% win rate. +187% average return after insider buys. $ET: 100% win rate. 52 purchases. $514M in total insider buying. $VST, $LUV, $CAT, $LLY, all 100% win rates. 73% of ALL insider purchases across the S&P 500 led to share price gains. But it didn't stop there. It also built: - A live purchase feed tracking every new SEC filing - Cluster buy detection (multiple insiders buying the same stock within 14 days) - A sector heatmap showing where insiders are putting their money - Top conviction buys (Berkshire's $2.1B OXY position, Musk's $1B TSLA buy) The whole thing looks like a Bloomberg terminal. Dark theme. Real time data. Fully interactive. I didn't write a single line of code. I just told Perplexity Computer what I wanted, and it researched the data, ran the analysis, and built the entire dashboard from scratch. This is the future of building things with AI. The best part was that it created a proprietary "Alpha Score" for every stock. This was a composite ranking from 0 to 100 that weighs four factors: 1. How often insiders bought (frequency) 2. How much money they put in (total value) 3. What percentage of buys led to gains (win rate) 4. How big those gains were (average forward return) The higher the Alpha Score, the stronger the correlation between insider buying and share price appreciation. It revealed insights you would've never expected. The energy sector ended up having the highest Alpha Score, meaning insiders buying energy stocks is very correlated with energy stocks surging. I have paid for data on insider buying in the past. I literally built a better tool with Perplexity Computer than the insider buying tools I have been using for the last 3 years.

Dividendology

184,157 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨SHOCKING: Most people will work 9 extra years because they never ran this AI model. I asked Perplexity Computer one question: "I'm 28, earning $85K. When can I retire with $2M?" Here's how it works: You describe your situation → It models 5% annual salary raises compounding over decades → Accounts for 401k limits, tax-advantaged growth, and employer match → Runs three parallel scenarios: aggressive, balanced, conservative → Adjusts for historical volatility, not just average returns → Factors inflation into the $2M target The result? Aggressive (90% equities): Retire at 52. Balanced (60/40): Retire at 56. Conservative (30/70): Retire at 61. 9 years of your life. Determined by one allocation decision. Here's the wildest part: Financial advisors charge $2,000+ for this exact analysis. And most use outdated Monte Carlo tools from 2015. Perplexity Computer did it in under 5 minutes. For free. No advisor fees. No upsell. No "let's schedule a follow-up."

🚨SHOCKING: Most people will work 9 extra years because they never ran this AI model. I asked Perplexity Computer one question: "I'm 28, earning $85K. When can I retire with $2M?" Here's how it works: You describe your situation → It models 5% annual salary raises compounding over decades → Accounts for 401k limits, tax-advantaged growth, and employer match → Runs three parallel scenarios: aggressive, balanced, conservative → Adjusts for historical volatility, not just average returns → Factors inflation into the $2M target The result? Aggressive (90% equities): Retire at 52. Balanced (60/40): Retire at 56. Conservative (30/70): Retire at 61. 9 years of your life. Determined by one allocation decision. Here's the wildest part: Financial advisors charge $2,000+ for this exact analysis. And most use outdated Monte Carlo tools from 2015. Perplexity Computer did it in under 5 minutes. For free. No advisor fees. No upsell. No "let's schedule a follow-up."

Hasan Toor

46,193 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Peter Thiel: "The value is never a premium on the past. It's always a discount to the future." Most founders walk into a fundraising negotiation anchored to the wrong number. They point to the last round, list everything built since then, and argue for a premium on that progress. Investors push back. The whole conversation becomes a fight over the past. Thiel thinks this framing is conceptually completely wrong. Investors aren't buying your history. They're buying your trajectory. And the moment you understand that, your entire approach to pitching valuation changes. "The way I always think one should try to pitch a company or the value of a company is by explaining why it will be worth a lot more in the future. The investors are getting to invest at a point that's a lot cheaper than it will be for the share price a year, two, three years from now." He learned this firsthand at PayPal. In late 1999, PayPal closed a round at $45 million. Three months later, they raised again at a $500 million valuation. A 5x jump in a single quarter. The obvious question: how do you convince anyone to accept that? "The way we presented the round was: this is going to be the last round before the IPO." That single reframe changed everything. Investors stopped looking backward and started looking forward. "It doesn't matter what happened three months ago. You're getting in at a discount to the IPO." The founder who can paint a compelling picture of where the company is going will always negotiate from a stronger position than one defending where it's been.

Peter Thiel: "The value is never a premium on the past. It's always a discount to the future." Most founders walk into a fundraising negotiation anchored to the wrong number. They point to the last round, list everything built since then, and argue for a premium on that progress. Investors push back. The whole conversation becomes a fight over the past. Thiel thinks this framing is conceptually completely wrong. Investors aren't buying your history. They're buying your trajectory. And the moment you understand that, your entire approach to pitching valuation changes. "The way I always think one should try to pitch a company or the value of a company is by explaining why it will be worth a lot more in the future. The investors are getting to invest at a point that's a lot cheaper than it will be for the share price a year, two, three years from now." He learned this firsthand at PayPal. In late 1999, PayPal closed a round at $45 million. Three months later, they raised again at a $500 million valuation. A 5x jump in a single quarter. The obvious question: how do you convince anyone to accept that? "The way we presented the round was: this is going to be the last round before the IPO." That single reframe changed everything. Investors stopped looking backward and started looking forward. "It doesn't matter what happened three months ago. You're getting in at a discount to the IPO." The founder who can paint a compelling picture of where the company is going will always negotiate from a stronger position than one defending where it's been.

Big Brain Business

17,915 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨PERPLEXITY JUST LAUNCHED SOMETHING THAT MAKES EVERY OTHER AI PRODUCT LOOK LIKE A TOY.. AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT.. They built a Personal Computer.. Not an app.. Not a chatbot.. A full digital worker that runs 24/7 on a Mac mini even while you sleep.. You press both command keys.. And it wakes up.. Ready to work.. But here's where it gets insane.. This thing doesn't run on one AI model.. It runs on 19 of them.. At the same time.. It uses Claude Opus for complex reasoning.. Gemini 3.1 Pro for deep research with a 2 million token context window.. Nano Banana Pro for 4K images.. Grok for fast tasks.. It doesn't just pick one model and hope for the best.. It reads your task.. Breaks it into subtasks.. And routes each one to whichever model is best at that specific thing.. All running in parallel.. While ChatGPT is still thinking about your first question.. Perplexity has already split your project into 6 pieces and assigned each one to a different AI.. And here's the part that should worry OpenAI.. Perplexity hallucinates at 3.3%.. ChatGPT hallucinates at 12%.. Claude at 15%.. It's not even close.. Because Perplexity is built differently.. Every other AI tries to remember facts.. Perplexity searches for them first.. It's structurally forced to cite live sources before it's even allowed to generate a response.. OpenAI Operator launched with a 32.6% success rate on computer-use tasks.. People called it "the world's most anxious intern" because it pauses every 5 seconds to ask if it's doing the right thing.. Perplexity runs multi-hour and multi-day workflows independently.. Only interrupts you when it hits a decision that actually matters.. You can start a task from your iPhone on the train.. And it executes on your Mac mini at home.. The economics are wild too.. Internal studies show it saved teams an average of $1.6 million in labor costs.. Performing 3.25 years of work in four weeks.. And unlike every other AI company.. Perplexity dropped ads entirely.. They charge $200 a month because they said they're in the "accuracy business".. Not the advertising business.. They even launched a $42.5 million publisher program to pay media partners when their content gets cited.. While OpenAI is getting sued by every newspaper on earth.. Google and OpenAI want you locked into their ecosystem.. If a better model comes out tomorrow you're stuck.. Perplexity just updates its routing matrix.. You get the best model on earth automatically.. No switching.. No migrations.. No friction.. This isn't an AI assistant anymore.. This is the first real AI employee.. And it costs $200 a month.

🚨PERPLEXITY JUST LAUNCHED SOMETHING THAT MAKES EVERY OTHER AI PRODUCT LOOK LIKE A TOY.. AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT.. They built a Personal Computer.. Not an app.. Not a chatbot.. A full digital worker that runs 24/7 on a Mac mini even while you sleep.. You press both command keys.. And it wakes up.. Ready to work.. But here's where it gets insane.. This thing doesn't run on one AI model.. It runs on 19 of them.. At the same time.. It uses Claude Opus for complex reasoning.. Gemini 3.1 Pro for deep research with a 2 million token context window.. Nano Banana Pro for 4K images.. Grok for fast tasks.. It doesn't just pick one model and hope for the best.. It reads your task.. Breaks it into subtasks.. And routes each one to whichever model is best at that specific thing.. All running in parallel.. While ChatGPT is still thinking about your first question.. Perplexity has already split your project into 6 pieces and assigned each one to a different AI.. And here's the part that should worry OpenAI.. Perplexity hallucinates at 3.3%.. ChatGPT hallucinates at 12%.. Claude at 15%.. It's not even close.. Because Perplexity is built differently.. Every other AI tries to remember facts.. Perplexity searches for them first.. It's structurally forced to cite live sources before it's even allowed to generate a response.. OpenAI Operator launched with a 32.6% success rate on computer-use tasks.. People called it "the world's most anxious intern" because it pauses every 5 seconds to ask if it's doing the right thing.. Perplexity runs multi-hour and multi-day workflows independently.. Only interrupts you when it hits a decision that actually matters.. You can start a task from your iPhone on the train.. And it executes on your Mac mini at home.. The economics are wild too.. Internal studies show it saved teams an average of $1.6 million in labor costs.. Performing 3.25 years of work in four weeks.. And unlike every other AI company.. Perplexity dropped ads entirely.. They charge $200 a month because they said they're in the "accuracy business".. Not the advertising business.. They even launched a $42.5 million publisher program to pay media partners when their content gets cited.. While OpenAI is getting sued by every newspaper on earth.. Google and OpenAI want you locked into their ecosystem.. If a better model comes out tomorrow you're stuck.. Perplexity just updates its routing matrix.. You get the best model on earth automatically.. No switching.. No migrations.. No friction.. This isn't an AI assistant anymore.. This is the first real AI employee.. And it costs $200 a month.

Evan Luthra

1,097,438 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨‼️BREAKING!!!: Even more names have just been revealed who are a part of Peter Thiel’s Secret Sex Cult Society, this time Pastor Rick Warren being a Member who will be attending their next Big Event in August!!! This is the same Peter Thiel who is setting up Flock Cameras everywhere to violate our Privacy and Civil Liberties on a Daily Basis! What’s even crazier is how this all connects to Jared Kushner’s new Elite Private Island that he just bought and lied to the Public about at the behest of Nathaniel Rothschild, who Kushner calls his “Good Friend”! We discuss all of this and more in the Video Clip below… What do you guys think? Let us know in the Comment Section. Repost and Like this Post if you agree that all of this Secretive Shadowy Elite crap needs to be exposed and that these Flock Cameras need to be taken down!

🚨‼️BREAKING!!!: Even more names have just been revealed who are a part of Peter Thiel’s Secret Sex Cult Society, this time Pastor Rick Warren being a Member who will be attending their next Big Event in August!!! This is the same Peter Thiel who is setting up Flock Cameras everywhere to violate our Privacy and Civil Liberties on a Daily Basis! What’s even crazier is how this all connects to Jared Kushner’s new Elite Private Island that he just bought and lied to the Public about at the behest of Nathaniel Rothschild, who Kushner calls his “Good Friend”! We discuss all of this and more in the Video Clip below… What do you guys think? Let us know in the Comment Section. Repost and Like this Post if you agree that all of this Secretive Shadowy Elite crap needs to be exposed and that these Flock Cameras need to be taken down!

Godrules1

21,915 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A 26-year-old guy from Ukraine turned himself into Zelensky with the help of AI and earned $3,000 in 3 minutes He used Claude for changing his appearance in real time He took part in a contest where it was necessary to make other bloggers laugh There were 3 rounds of 3 minutes each, and every round could bring $1,000, so he won all 3 and took home $3,000 He regularly hosts streams where he earns $2,000–$5,500 on average over 5 hours thanks to donations AI and a little bit of creativity can change your life forever

A 26-year-old guy from Ukraine turned himself into Zelensky with the help of AI and earned $3,000 in 3 minutes He used Claude for changing his appearance in real time He took part in a contest where it was necessary to make other bloggers laugh There were 3 rounds of 3 minutes each, and every round could bring $1,000, so he won all 3 and took home $3,000 He regularly hosts streams where he earns $2,000–$5,500 on average over 5 hours thanks to donations AI and a little bit of creativity can change your life forever

Bober_smart

48,195 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

"This is the first synthetic species,” microbiologist J. Craig Venter told 60 Minutes’ Steve Kroft in 2010. His team of scientists created a synthetic bacteria designed on a computer, with man-made DNA. Venter says that from concept to completion, it took 15 years and $40 million to make. Venter, who died this week at 79, was one of the most famous scientists in the world, known for his pioneering work in deciphering the human genetic code.

"This is the first synthetic species,” microbiologist J. Craig Venter told 60 Minutes’ Steve Kroft in 2010. His team of scientists created a synthetic bacteria designed on a computer, with man-made DNA. Venter says that from concept to completion, it took 15 years and $40 million to make. Venter, who died this week at 79, was one of the most famous scientists in the world, known for his pioneering work in deciphering the human genetic code.

60 Minutes

92,325 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

How can anyone actually believe the Rashtrakuta empire constructed Kailasa temple at Ellora in 19 years! In order to remove 300,000 tonnes of basalt, it would require 10 cubic meters of basalt being excavated daily by a robust 200 person labour force to excavate the basalt. That's moving roughly 30 tonnes of solid basalt rock every single day would still take 33 years minimum. And thats not even including the managing staff of cooks, foreman’s, tools sharpeners, round the clock engineers. All the carts and animals for logistics for removal of basalt; all of this before the sculpting can even begin. So 19 years to achieve this with nothing but iron and copper tools and no real proof of construction other than scrawling None of it makes any sense the more you begin to dive into the mystery of Ellora.

How can anyone actually believe the Rashtrakuta empire constructed Kailasa temple at Ellora in 19 years! In order to remove 300,000 tonnes of basalt, it would require 10 cubic meters of basalt being excavated daily by a robust 200 person labour force to excavate the basalt. That's moving roughly 30 tonnes of solid basalt rock every single day would still take 33 years minimum. And thats not even including the managing staff of cooks, foreman’s, tools sharpeners, round the clock engineers. All the carts and animals for logistics for removal of basalt; all of this before the sculpting can even begin. So 19 years to achieve this with nothing but iron and copper tools and no real proof of construction other than scrawling None of it makes any sense the more you begin to dive into the mystery of Ellora.

Fozzie

226,173 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Peter Thiel on the importance of pitching your startup as a “discount to the future” Most founders will pitch their startup valuation as a sort of premium on the last round (e.g. “Our valuation last year was X, we’ve made Y progress, and now we deserve a valuation 2x greater.”) But Thiel argues that this is “completely wrong.” “The value is never a premium on the past. It’s always a discount to the future. I think the way one should always try to pitch the value of a company is by explaining why it will be worth a lot more in the future and why investors are getting to invest at a point that it’s a lot cheaper.” He uses his experience fundraising for PayPal as an example. In March 2000, PayPal raised a round at a $500M pre-money valuation, which was a massive premium on the $45M valuation from their raise 3-months prior (note: PayPal also completed a 50/50 merger with Elon Musk’s x in this 3-month period). How did they get a 5x step up in 3 months? Thiel explains: “The way we presented the round was: this is going to be the last round before the IPO. We got people thinking the next round is going to be the IPO and this was going to be at a discount to the IPO. It doesn’t matter what happened three months ago—you’re getting it at a discount to the IPO.” He concludes: “Always think of it as a discount to the future. Never a premium on the past.”

Peter Thiel on the importance of pitching your startup as a “discount to the future” Most founders will pitch their startup valuation as a sort of premium on the last round (e.g. “Our valuation last year was X, we’ve made Y progress, and now we deserve a valuation 2x greater.”) But Thiel argues that this is “completely wrong.” “The value is never a premium on the past. It’s always a discount to the future. I think the way one should always try to pitch the value of a company is by explaining why it will be worth a lot more in the future and why investors are getting to invest at a point that it’s a lot cheaper.” He uses his experience fundraising for PayPal as an example. In March 2000, PayPal raised a round at a $500M pre-money valuation, which was a massive premium on the $45M valuation from their raise 3-months prior (note: PayPal also completed a 50/50 merger with Elon Musk’s x in this 3-month period). How did they get a 5x step up in 3 months? Thiel explains: “The way we presented the round was: this is going to be the last round before the IPO. We got people thinking the next round is going to be the IPO and this was going to be at a discount to the IPO. It doesn’t matter what happened three months ago—you’re getting it at a discount to the IPO.” He concludes: “Always think of it as a discount to the future. Never a premium on the past.”

Startup Archive

169,153 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on the brutal truth about who actually makes money in AI (and why it's not who you think): Aravind argues that the real value in AI comes from orchestration. He points to products like Codex, Claude Code, and Perplexity Computer: "What is that? It's an orchestration system. It takes a model, pairs it with an agent harness." And what is an agent harness? "The simplest way of describing it is like rules for how the agent loop should run. What are all the skills and sub-agents and connectors and tools it accesses? Without the harness, you don't necessarily capture and convert the intrinsic intelligence in the model into valuable output tokens." This leads to a blunt conclusion about who has a real business in AI, and who doesn't: "If you're literally just a reseller of model tokens, you have no business, because the model will get commoditized. So even if you're a model builder, you don't have a business. As an infra layer, you have some business on serving those output tokens. But as an application layer or model builder, you don't really have a business if you're just a reseller of tokens that come directly out of the model." So where does the value accrue? "You have a business if you know how to take the model, ground it in valuable context, orchestrate it with a really good agent harness, connected to the right set of tools and connectors (whether it's personal connectors or business connectors) and provide the experience to people in one single unified system." Aravind Srinivas then explains Perplexity's specific edge: Beyond orchestrating across tools, files, and connectors, they also orchestrate across models. "That is the differentiation that Anthropic and OpenAI cannot claim, because you wouldn't find GPT-5 inside the Claude Code harness. You wouldn't find Claude Opus inside the Codex harness. These are competing with each other. Whereas you would find both these models inside Perplexity Computer." Why does this matter? Because it all comes down to power. In Aravind's framing, the fundamental cost driver in AI is watts (the one input nobody can subsidize except the government). "Whoever provides the most valuable output tokens with the least amount of power expended to produce them generates the greatest value to the end user, has the most pricing power, has the most value. That is the orchestration problem to solve." His conclusion: "The one single most important metric in AI is token value per watt per user."

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on the brutal truth about who actually makes money in AI (and why it's not who you think): Aravind argues that the real value in AI comes from orchestration. He points to products like Codex, Claude Code, and Perplexity Computer: "What is that? It's an orchestration system. It takes a model, pairs it with an agent harness." And what is an agent harness? "The simplest way of describing it is like rules for how the agent loop should run. What are all the skills and sub-agents and connectors and tools it accesses? Without the harness, you don't necessarily capture and convert the intrinsic intelligence in the model into valuable output tokens." This leads to a blunt conclusion about who has a real business in AI, and who doesn't: "If you're literally just a reseller of model tokens, you have no business, because the model will get commoditized. So even if you're a model builder, you don't have a business. As an infra layer, you have some business on serving those output tokens. But as an application layer or model builder, you don't really have a business if you're just a reseller of tokens that come directly out of the model." So where does the value accrue? "You have a business if you know how to take the model, ground it in valuable context, orchestrate it with a really good agent harness, connected to the right set of tools and connectors (whether it's personal connectors or business connectors) and provide the experience to people in one single unified system." Aravind Srinivas then explains Perplexity's specific edge: Beyond orchestrating across tools, files, and connectors, they also orchestrate across models. "That is the differentiation that Anthropic and OpenAI cannot claim, because you wouldn't find GPT-5 inside the Claude Code harness. You wouldn't find Claude Opus inside the Codex harness. These are competing with each other. Whereas you would find both these models inside Perplexity Computer." Why does this matter? Because it all comes down to power. In Aravind's framing, the fundamental cost driver in AI is watts (the one input nobody can subsidize except the government). "Whoever provides the most valuable output tokens with the least amount of power expended to produce them generates the greatest value to the end user, has the most pricing power, has the most value. That is the orchestration problem to solve." His conclusion: "The one single most important metric in AI is token value per watt per user."

Big Brain AI

40,092 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

MIND BLOWING 🤯 Patrick Wood connects J.D. Vance, Don Trump Jr., Charlie Kirk, and Peter Thiel via the 1789 capital firm. The firm's first investment? Tucker Carlson. Howse: "What do you think the goal and objective is of these folks? ...Technocracy?" Wood: "Absolutely." This clip of Patrick Wood (Patrick Wood), an economic and market forecaster, speaker, and author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation and Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order, is taken from an interview with Brannon Howse (Brannon Howse) posted to YouTube on November 7, 2025. Note that Wood says that "We see Peter Thiel in everything going back at least 25 years, starting with the PayPal mafia. And now he's just everywhere you look. And all of a sudden he shows up here in this story where he's with J.D. Vance and Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. He's everywhere, it seems like. And this is not a mistake for sure." ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Wood: "This is so deep at this point. I'm still kind of figuring out where all of these connections are. But we see John Don Jr. JD Vance, Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson." Howse: "Wait a minute. Charlie Kirk was at this meeting? Wood: "Not exactly, but he was one of the first investors in the 1789 capital firm." Howse: "Was he really?" Wood: "Yes, he was. [And] this basically kind of debunks the idea that, he had a brush-in with Peter Thiel when he was in college, or before he went to college." Howse: "And you're, talking about JD Vance now?" Wood: "No, I'm talking about Charlie Kirk. Okay. Ch— Charlie Kirk, applied for a grant from Peter Thiel. He didn't get it, but nevertheless he was there, okay? When he was under 20 years old. So I would have dismissed that. Okay, he did it, he lost, and he didn't get anywhere. But now it comes out there was a relationship all along with Peter thiel because the 1789 capital fund included Peter Thiel as well. He's one of the architects of it, if you will. And he was a friend of all these people, including J.D. Vance. And of course J.D. Vance is his protege. But now it appears that Charlie Kirk knew exactly what he was doing with Peter Thiel and he dumped a lot of money into the 1789 capital fund." Howse: "And you have that documented?" Wood: "Yep. Well, it's in this doc. It's in this article. It said plainly, says he, he was one of the first investors." Howse: "And what was the— What is the goal of this organization that you say he and others were investing in?" Wood: "Well, this was, this is a venture capital company and you know, they invest in companies. Like the first investment they made was to fund What was Carlson's network? TCN, I think it was, right? ...That was their first investment. So their idea was to invest in non-Woke companies and that included I guess, TCN, that was the first thing they put money into. But they've invested in other companies since. So it's been very profitable for the people who did this. And now we see that Omeed Malik. Malik Perhaps, he's the CEO of 1789 Capital." Howse: "Let me go back to the article. It says, the impact of Rockbridge and Super PACS on the 2024 election is not well understood. Rockbridge's affiliated Super PAC. Turnout for America was one of a handful of groups that canvassed swing states on behalf of the Trump campaign, including Charlie Kirk's Turning Point Action. Turnout for America spent 34.5 million on the 2024 cycle, according to FCC records. Far less than the 261 million from Elon Musk and America's PAC. So what you're seeing is they worked very hard to get Donald Trump elected. Is this why we're seeing Donald Trump go so big with the Tech Bros?" Wood: "Apparently so. It seems. You know, it seems like this whole— This whole thing was architected by Peter Thiel in the first place. We document this in our book the Final Betrayal. We write a lot about Peter Thiel and documenting exactly where he came from, how he's done all this stuff, how he strategized. He's a master strategist for sure. But he was. We see Peter Thiel in everything going back at least 25 years, starting with the PayPal mafia. And now he's just everywhere you look. And all of a sudden he shows up here in this story where, where he's with J.D. Vance and Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. He's everywhere, it seems like. And, this is not a mistake for sure." Howse: "So what do you think the goal and objective is of these folks? Is it just technocracy?" Wood: "Absolutely. Absolutely. So these people, they're. Well, they're one column for sure. There's other people who want to take over the country as well and take over the world. Like the old song says, everybody wants to take over the world." Howse: "Do you think it's possible that Charlie Kirk got into this and saw what was going on, was about to blow the whistle on any of this?" Wood: "This is a good possibility. I wouldn't say that outright, but I think I'm, I'm thinking it, Okay?"

MIND BLOWING 🤯 Patrick Wood connects J.D. Vance, Don Trump Jr., Charlie Kirk, and Peter Thiel via the 1789 capital firm. The firm's first investment? Tucker Carlson. Howse: "What do you think the goal and objective is of these folks? ...Technocracy?" Wood: "Absolutely." This clip of Patrick Wood (Patrick Wood), an economic and market forecaster, speaker, and author of Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation and Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order, is taken from an interview with Brannon Howse (Brannon Howse) posted to YouTube on November 7, 2025. Note that Wood says that "We see Peter Thiel in everything going back at least 25 years, starting with the PayPal mafia. And now he's just everywhere you look. And all of a sudden he shows up here in this story where he's with J.D. Vance and Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. He's everywhere, it seems like. And this is not a mistake for sure." ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Wood: "This is so deep at this point. I'm still kind of figuring out where all of these connections are. But we see John Don Jr. JD Vance, Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson." Howse: "Wait a minute. Charlie Kirk was at this meeting? Wood: "Not exactly, but he was one of the first investors in the 1789 capital firm." Howse: "Was he really?" Wood: "Yes, he was. [And] this basically kind of debunks the idea that, he had a brush-in with Peter Thiel when he was in college, or before he went to college." Howse: "And you're, talking about JD Vance now?" Wood: "No, I'm talking about Charlie Kirk. Okay. Ch— Charlie Kirk, applied for a grant from Peter Thiel. He didn't get it, but nevertheless he was there, okay? When he was under 20 years old. So I would have dismissed that. Okay, he did it, he lost, and he didn't get anywhere. But now it comes out there was a relationship all along with Peter thiel because the 1789 capital fund included Peter Thiel as well. He's one of the architects of it, if you will. And he was a friend of all these people, including J.D. Vance. And of course J.D. Vance is his protege. But now it appears that Charlie Kirk knew exactly what he was doing with Peter Thiel and he dumped a lot of money into the 1789 capital fund." Howse: "And you have that documented?" Wood: "Yep. Well, it's in this doc. It's in this article. It said plainly, says he, he was one of the first investors." Howse: "And what was the— What is the goal of this organization that you say he and others were investing in?" Wood: "Well, this was, this is a venture capital company and you know, they invest in companies. Like the first investment they made was to fund What was Carlson's network? TCN, I think it was, right? ...That was their first investment. So their idea was to invest in non-Woke companies and that included I guess, TCN, that was the first thing they put money into. But they've invested in other companies since. So it's been very profitable for the people who did this. And now we see that Omeed Malik. Malik Perhaps, he's the CEO of 1789 Capital." Howse: "Let me go back to the article. It says, the impact of Rockbridge and Super PACS on the 2024 election is not well understood. Rockbridge's affiliated Super PAC. Turnout for America was one of a handful of groups that canvassed swing states on behalf of the Trump campaign, including Charlie Kirk's Turning Point Action. Turnout for America spent 34.5 million on the 2024 cycle, according to FCC records. Far less than the 261 million from Elon Musk and America's PAC. So what you're seeing is they worked very hard to get Donald Trump elected. Is this why we're seeing Donald Trump go so big with the Tech Bros?" Wood: "Apparently so. It seems. You know, it seems like this whole— This whole thing was architected by Peter Thiel in the first place. We document this in our book the Final Betrayal. We write a lot about Peter Thiel and documenting exactly where he came from, how he's done all this stuff, how he strategized. He's a master strategist for sure. But he was. We see Peter Thiel in everything going back at least 25 years, starting with the PayPal mafia. And now he's just everywhere you look. And all of a sudden he shows up here in this story where, where he's with J.D. Vance and Tucker Carlson and Charlie Kirk, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. He's everywhere, it seems like. And, this is not a mistake for sure." Howse: "So what do you think the goal and objective is of these folks? Is it just technocracy?" Wood: "Absolutely. Absolutely. So these people, they're. Well, they're one column for sure. There's other people who want to take over the country as well and take over the world. Like the old song says, everybody wants to take over the world." Howse: "Do you think it's possible that Charlie Kirk got into this and saw what was going on, was about to blow the whistle on any of this?" Wood: "This is a good possibility. I wouldn't say that outright, but I think I'm, I'm thinking it, Okay?"

Sense Receptor

26,055 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan on Iran: We are against all scenarios aimed at triggering a civil war in Iran. This is the most dangerous scenario, and we warn both the West and the East — everyone — against it. Such a scenario will not only lead to even greater suffering of innocent civilians in Iran, but it could also result in the displacement of millions of people and force them to flee as refugees to neighboring countries and beyond. Is he worried about Iran or about the refugees who might flood into Turkey?

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan on Iran: We are against all scenarios aimed at triggering a civil war in Iran. This is the most dangerous scenario, and we warn both the West and the East — everyone — against it. Such a scenario will not only lead to even greater suffering of innocent civilians in Iran, but it could also result in the displacement of millions of people and force them to flee as refugees to neighboring countries and beyond. Is he worried about Iran or about the refugees who might flood into Turkey?

Sprinter Press

17,277 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

ONE OF THE WORLD GREATEST INVESTORS ON WHY BITCOIN $BTC IS ANTISOCIAL, STUPID AND IMMORAL! Charlie Munger gave this interview not long before his death, here are his key thoughts on $BTC: - "The Computer Science that is behind Bitcoin is a great triumph for the human mind" - "They've actually created a product that is hard to create more of, but not impossible" - "A lot of the Computer Science people love it just because its such an extreme achievement of Computer Science" - "I see an artificial speculative medium, that people are buying just because they think they can sell it to somebody else at a higher price, even though it inherently has no intrinsic value" - "I regard the whole business as anti-social, stupid and immoral" In summary: 1. Munger’s issue wasn’t the tech - it was the economics. He admired the innovation but saw no cash flow or intrinsic value behind the asset. 2. His critique reflects classic value-investing logic: if you can’t price it, you’re not investing..you’re speculating. 3. He viewed Bitcoin’s rise as a product of FOMO and gambler psychology, not productive economic activity. I agree with him, Bitcoin is not a store of value it's dropped 30% in just the last few weeks. BITCOIN IS NOT THE NEW GOLD!

ONE OF THE WORLD GREATEST INVESTORS ON WHY BITCOIN $BTC IS ANTISOCIAL, STUPID AND IMMORAL! Charlie Munger gave this interview not long before his death, here are his key thoughts on $BTC: - "The Computer Science that is behind Bitcoin is a great triumph for the human mind" - "They've actually created a product that is hard to create more of, but not impossible" - "A lot of the Computer Science people love it just because its such an extreme achievement of Computer Science" - "I see an artificial speculative medium, that people are buying just because they think they can sell it to somebody else at a higher price, even though it inherently has no intrinsic value" - "I regard the whole business as anti-social, stupid and immoral" In summary: 1. Munger’s issue wasn’t the tech - it was the economics. He admired the innovation but saw no cash flow or intrinsic value behind the asset. 2. His critique reflects classic value-investing logic: if you can’t price it, you’re not investing..you’re speculating. 3. He viewed Bitcoin’s rise as a product of FOMO and gambler psychology, not productive economic activity. I agree with him, Bitcoin is not a store of value it's dropped 30% in just the last few weeks. BITCOIN IS NOT THE NEW GOLD!

Common Sense Investor (CSI)

184,748 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

In 1901, divers pulled a lump of corroded bronze out of a two thousand year old shipwreck. It took the next century to understand what it was, and the answer broke the timeline of human history. It's called the Antikythera Mechanism, and it is the oldest known computer on earth. It was built by the ancient Greeks, around 100 BC, and it should not exist. Nothing else of its sophistication would appear anywhere in the world for more than a thousand years after it... It was found by sponge divers off the Greek island of Antikythera, in the wreck of a trading ship that had sunk in the first century BC, surrounded by bronze statues and pottery. The corroded fragments looked like nothing at first, and sat largely ignored in a museum in Athens. Only over the following decades, and especially with modern X-ray and CT scanning in our own century, did researchers finally see inside it. What they found was a machine. Behind its bronze face was a system of at least thirty interlocking precision gears, cut and arranged with a sophistication that would not be matched until the geared astronomical clocks of medieval Europe, well over a thousand years later. It was, in the words of the team that studied it, a mechanical computer that worked by turning astronomical theory into bronze... And it did extraordinary things. You turned a hand crank on the side, and the mechanism calculated the positions of the sun, the moon, and the five planets the Greeks knew. It tracked the phases of the moon. It predicted solar and lunar eclipses years in advance. It even displayed the four-year cycle of the ancient Olympic Games. A person standing in the ancient world could set this device to a date and watch the heavens be calculated in front of them, by gears, by hand. Roughly a third of the original survives, in 82 corroded fragments. We still do not know who designed it, or how a civilization without anything resembling industrial machinery achieved this level of precision engineering. What is certain is that it was not a one-off accident. A device this refined implies a tradition behind it, generations of knowledge and earlier attempts that have been lost completely. The Antikythera Mechanism is proof of how much the ancient world knew, and how much of what human beings have achieved has simply vanished without a trace, leaving us to stumble on a single piece of it at the bottom of the sea...

In 1901, divers pulled a lump of corroded bronze out of a two thousand year old shipwreck. It took the next century to understand what it was, and the answer broke the timeline of human history. It's called the Antikythera Mechanism, and it is the oldest known computer on earth. It was built by the ancient Greeks, around 100 BC, and it should not exist. Nothing else of its sophistication would appear anywhere in the world for more than a thousand years after it... It was found by sponge divers off the Greek island of Antikythera, in the wreck of a trading ship that had sunk in the first century BC, surrounded by bronze statues and pottery. The corroded fragments looked like nothing at first, and sat largely ignored in a museum in Athens. Only over the following decades, and especially with modern X-ray and CT scanning in our own century, did researchers finally see inside it. What they found was a machine. Behind its bronze face was a system of at least thirty interlocking precision gears, cut and arranged with a sophistication that would not be matched until the geared astronomical clocks of medieval Europe, well over a thousand years later. It was, in the words of the team that studied it, a mechanical computer that worked by turning astronomical theory into bronze... And it did extraordinary things. You turned a hand crank on the side, and the mechanism calculated the positions of the sun, the moon, and the five planets the Greeks knew. It tracked the phases of the moon. It predicted solar and lunar eclipses years in advance. It even displayed the four-year cycle of the ancient Olympic Games. A person standing in the ancient world could set this device to a date and watch the heavens be calculated in front of them, by gears, by hand. Roughly a third of the original survives, in 82 corroded fragments. We still do not know who designed it, or how a civilization without anything resembling industrial machinery achieved this level of precision engineering. What is certain is that it was not a one-off accident. A device this refined implies a tradition behind it, generations of knowledge and earlier attempts that have been lost completely. The Antikythera Mechanism is proof of how much the ancient world knew, and how much of what human beings have achieved has simply vanished without a trace, leaving us to stumble on a single piece of it at the bottom of the sea...

James Lucas

246,486 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Paypal co-founder Peter Thiel offers a contrarian view on mastery: the best founders aren't specialists, they're polymaths who understand how everything connects. After 14 years on the Facebook board, Thiel has watched Mark Zuckerberg up close. And he's noticed something that cuts against conventional wisdom about what it takes to build something great. "I think that one kind of perspective for a lot of the world-class entrepreneurs is they're not specialists. They're something close to polymaths." Thiel uses Zuckerberg as his prime example: "If you have a conversation with Mark Zuckerberg, he'd be able to speak with a surprising amount of understanding about a lot of things. He could talk about the details of the Facebook product, the psychology of social media, the way the culture is shifting, the management of the company, and how this fits into the bigger history of technology." This stands in stark contrast to how academia frames expertise: "Whereas the sort of academic view is often that you're like a narrow expert on one thing and that's what you do and what it is about. It's much more this polymath-like intellect who understands all these different things." Peter Thiel reflects on what this has looked like at the board level: "The kinds of board conversations we've had over the last 13, 14 years, it's just been this crazy range." The takeaway: world-class founders don't just go deep in one area. They think across product, psychology, culture, management, and technology history, and they see how it all connects.

Paypal co-founder Peter Thiel offers a contrarian view on mastery: the best founders aren't specialists, they're polymaths who understand how everything connects. After 14 years on the Facebook board, Thiel has watched Mark Zuckerberg up close. And he's noticed something that cuts against conventional wisdom about what it takes to build something great. "I think that one kind of perspective for a lot of the world-class entrepreneurs is they're not specialists. They're something close to polymaths." Thiel uses Zuckerberg as his prime example: "If you have a conversation with Mark Zuckerberg, he'd be able to speak with a surprising amount of understanding about a lot of things. He could talk about the details of the Facebook product, the psychology of social media, the way the culture is shifting, the management of the company, and how this fits into the bigger history of technology." This stands in stark contrast to how academia frames expertise: "Whereas the sort of academic view is often that you're like a narrow expert on one thing and that's what you do and what it is about. It's much more this polymath-like intellect who understands all these different things." Peter Thiel reflects on what this has looked like at the board level: "The kinds of board conversations we've had over the last 13, 14 years, it's just been this crazy range." The takeaway: world-class founders don't just go deep in one area. They think across product, psychology, culture, management, and technology history, and they see how it all connects.

Big Brain Business

69,444 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🤯incredible,its playability and usability are outstanding. Tron2 is a LEGO robot. It can be assembled into various forms depending on the scenario, including bipedal, wheeled, and humanoid torso configurations, and its end effectors are also interchangeable. Each form of the robot is driven by a VLA model. It can perform complex movements and can also be integrated into existing workflows to perform tasks. It's worth mentioning that this solves the problem of which type of humanoid robot to use. Each user can assemble the robot in a configuration that suits their specific scenario, making it truly flexible and versatile – it doesn't necessarily have to be bipedal or wheeled... I look forward to seeing more real-world use cases.

🤯incredible,its playability and usability are outstanding. Tron2 is a LEGO robot. It can be assembled into various forms depending on the scenario, including bipedal, wheeled, and humanoid torso configurations, and its end effectors are also interchangeable. Each form of the robot is driven by a VLA model. It can perform complex movements and can also be integrated into existing workflows to perform tasks. It's worth mentioning that this solves the problem of which type of humanoid robot to use. Each user can assemble the robot in a configuration that suits their specific scenario, making it truly flexible and versatile – it doesn't necessarily have to be bipedal or wheeled... I look forward to seeing more real-world use cases.

CyberRobo

147,344 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Raw round-by-round vod review of Hunter Mims's astra gameplay in premier (per his request of "proving" he is trolling his team half of the rounds and maybe the entire map). General points for people not going to watch the 40 minutes: - Abysmal astra utility (both macro/micro wise and if he even buys it). - Lack of understanding of his job and win cons. - Bad fight micro (likes to crouch spray smokes with a vandal). - Only 4 impact kills (very proud of a 13-17 scoreboard). - Terrible IGLing (he was subbing into the role though according to his teammate, so it is okay I guess). I forgot this in the vod review I believe (it is a note from my quick skim through of the replay before I recorded). 👇👇 Round 10: This timing that the iso took nest should 100% be known and you are giving all of the information rotating how you are to easily let us come B and win the round. Even if he was only top mid, he can hear you full sprinting spawn.

Raw round-by-round vod review of Hunter Mims's astra gameplay in premier (per his request of "proving" he is trolling his team half of the rounds and maybe the entire map). General points for people not going to watch the 40 minutes: - Abysmal astra utility (both macro/micro wise and if he even buys it). - Lack of understanding of his job and win cons. - Bad fight micro (likes to crouch spray smokes with a vandal). - Only 4 impact kills (very proud of a 13-17 scoreboard). - Terrible IGLing (he was subbing into the role though according to his teammate, so it is okay I guess). I forgot this in the vod review I believe (it is a note from my quick skim through of the replay before I recorded). 👇👇 Round 10: This timing that the iso took nest should 100% be known and you are giving all of the information rotating how you are to easily let us come B and win the round. Even if he was only top mid, he can hear you full sprinting spawn.

Noble

93,222 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A dollar bill is made of linen and cotton. But we accept it because we trust it. Over 16 years Bitcoin has built its own trust system — decentralized, no central authority, no single point of failure. And now Morgan Stanley is in. Goldman filed a Bitcoin ETF this morning. It’s becoming part of the model portfolio for individuals and institutions worldwide. There will only be 21 million coins ever. If each coin’s value is $1 million — that’s $21 trillion. Still below gold’s total market cap, but faster to move and easier to store. Read Niall Ferguson’s The Ascent of Money. Every characteristic that has defined money throughout human history — Bitcoin checks every single box. That’s why I’m bullish.

A dollar bill is made of linen and cotton. But we accept it because we trust it. Over 16 years Bitcoin has built its own trust system — decentralized, no central authority, no single point of failure. And now Morgan Stanley is in. Goldman filed a Bitcoin ETF this morning. It’s becoming part of the model portfolio for individuals and institutions worldwide. There will only be 21 million coins ever. If each coin’s value is $1 million — that’s $21 trillion. Still below gold’s total market cap, but faster to move and easier to store. Read Niall Ferguson’s The Ascent of Money. Every characteristic that has defined money throughout human history — Bitcoin checks every single box. That’s why I’m bullish.

Anthony Scaramucci

41,174 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

If you had told me almost 11 years ago, when Interstellar premiered, that I’d be able to do what you see here all by myself at home with just my computer, I wouldn’t have believed it 🤯 But now, with Veo 3 integrated into Runway creative assistant, it’s possible to create shorts, trailers, and even almost fully professional films. Absolutely insane. And now tell me this isn’t progress — that AI isn’t the greatest creative revolution in the history of humanity 🚀🎬

If you had told me almost 11 years ago, when Interstellar premiered, that I’d be able to do what you see here all by myself at home with just my computer, I wouldn’t have believed it 🤯 But now, with Veo 3 integrated into Runway creative assistant, it’s possible to create shorts, trailers, and even almost fully professional films. Absolutely insane. And now tell me this isn’t progress — that AI isn’t the greatest creative revolution in the history of humanity 🚀🎬

OscarAI

25,228 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten