Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨PERPLEXITY JUST LAUNCHED SOMETHING THAT MAKES EVERY OTHER AI PRODUCT LOOK LIKE A TOY.. AND NOBODY IS TALKING ABOUT IT.. They built a Personal Computer.. Not an app.. Not a chatbot.. A full digital worker that runs 24/7 on a Mac mini even while you sleep.. You press both...

EvanLuthra's profile picture

Evan Luthra

394,603 subscribers

1,096,928 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

There's an AI that runs 19 models at the same time on a Mac Mini. It works while you sleep. Not one brain. Nineteen. Each one a specialist. Here's what the Perplexity Personal Computer actually does: → You say "build me a website." → One model researches your competitors. → Another designs the layout. → Another writes the copy. → Another makes the images. → Then it publishes the whole thing. By itself. No clicking. No dragging. No switching between apps. It runs 24/7 on your Mac Mini. Always on. Never stops. You go to bed. You wake up. Your AI already finished the work. It also has access to your real files, folders, and apps. Not stuck in a chat window anymore. And unlike OpenClaw, it has a kill switch, audit logs, and confirmation steps before anything sensitive happens. We went from AI as a tool to AI as a worker. Save this. In two years, everyone will have one of these.
8:08

There's an AI that runs 19 models at the same time on a Mac Mini. It works while you sleep. Not one brain. Nineteen. Each one a specialist. Here's what the Perplexity Personal Computer actually does: → You say "build me a website." → One model researches your competitors. → Another designs the layout. → Another writes the copy. → Another makes the images. → Then it publishes the whole thing. By itself. No clicking. No dragging. No switching between apps. It runs 24/7 on your Mac Mini. Always on. Never stops. You go to bed. You wake up. Your AI already finished the work. It also has access to your real files, folders, and apps. Not stuck in a chat window anymore. And unlike OpenClaw, it has a kill switch, audit logs, and confirmation steps before anything sensitive happens. We went from AI as a tool to AI as a worker. Save this. In two years, everyone will have one of these.

Julian Goldie SEO

25,880 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

OpenClaw just got a plugin nobody is talking about. And it can replace a whole operations team. It is called Paperclip. It lets you build a full AI company on your own computer. You get an AI CEO. You get a marketing team. You get a tech team. They have real memory so they never forget a task. They wake up every day and do the work for you. You do not have to manage them or pay them a salary. Your data stays safe because it runs on your hardware. Here is how to start today. Go to GitHub and download OpenClaw. Install the Paperclip dashboard inside it. Pick one task and hire your first AI worker.
8:46

OpenClaw just got a plugin nobody is talking about. And it can replace a whole operations team. It is called Paperclip. It lets you build a full AI company on your own computer. You get an AI CEO. You get a marketing team. You get a tech team. They have real memory so they never forget a task. They wake up every day and do the work for you. You do not have to manage them or pay them a salary. Your data stays safe because it runs on your hardware. Here is how to start today. Go to GitHub and download OpenClaw. Install the Paperclip dashboard inside it. Pick one task and hire your first AI worker.

Julian Goldie SEO

33,889 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨Keith Rabois on Perplexity's AI browser: "It's a great Hail Mary attempt" because " absent something like this, Perplexity is toast." @jason: "OpenAI and Perplexity are going after the browser." "Perplexity launched Comet for their $200/month tier." "This is a really interesting category. Having your browser connected to agents lets you do really interesting things." Keith Rabois: "I think it's a great Hail Mary attempt by Perplexity." "I think absent something like this, Perplexity is toast." "Like, per the stat about ChatGPT going to a billion users, it's becoming the verb, you know, the way you describe using AI for a normal consumer." "There's nothing left of Perplexity if they can't pull this off." "So it's a great idea because the history of consumer technology companies is, whoever has uphill ground, like in a military sense, whoever's first has a lot of control." "This is actually what Google should be doing, truthfully." "I think Google Search is toast." "And since they have Chrome and they theoretically have a quality team in Gemini, they should be putting these two things together and hoping to compete with ChatGPT." "They're gonna lose the search game. The assets that are best at Google right now have nothing to do with search." "It's every other product that's the only thing that's gonna save that company if they can figure out how to use them."
1:00

🚨Keith Rabois on Perplexity's AI browser: "It's a great Hail Mary attempt" because " absent something like this, Perplexity is toast." @jason: "OpenAI and Perplexity are going after the browser." "Perplexity launched Comet for their $200/month tier." "This is a really interesting category. Having your browser connected to agents lets you do really interesting things." Keith Rabois: "I think it's a great Hail Mary attempt by Perplexity." "I think absent something like this, Perplexity is toast." "Like, per the stat about ChatGPT going to a billion users, it's becoming the verb, you know, the way you describe using AI for a normal consumer." "There's nothing left of Perplexity if they can't pull this off." "So it's a great idea because the history of consumer technology companies is, whoever has uphill ground, like in a military sense, whoever's first has a lot of control." "This is actually what Google should be doing, truthfully." "I think Google Search is toast." "And since they have Chrome and they theoretically have a quality team in Gemini, they should be putting these two things together and hoping to compete with ChatGPT." "They're gonna lose the search game. The assets that are best at Google right now have nothing to do with search." "It's every other product that's the only thing that's gonna save that company if they can figure out how to use them."

The All-In Podcast

45,297 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

One guy keeps a farm of Mac minis on his desk and says each $600 box brings him $2,000 a month while he sleeps. AND THE HARDWARE ACTUALLY WORKS. But the number is not even the interesting part. The broken part is HOW: his AI no longer sits in a chat window. It sees the screen, moves the mouse itself, types and clicks the interface like a human at a computer. That is it. While most people still run AI in a chat and ask it for text, he sat Claude down right at the computer and put it to work with its hands. He automated not a single task but the workplace itself. How it actually works: on every Mac mini Claude runs with computer use turned on and the official Claude API docs spell it out: screenshot capture, mouse control, keyboard input, desktop automation. The agent opens the browser and the apps itself and runs the boring routine on a schedule: pulls leads, fills the CRM, checks orders, runs QA on the site. One box, one quiet worker that does not sleep and does not ask for a salary. His math is simple: a Mac mini is $600 once, Claude Max is $200 a month, and a live white-collar worker on the same routine costs a business $4,000 and up. So he rents out each node to a client as an AI worker for about $2,000 and 6 Mac minis come out to around $12,000 a month with costs a bit over $1,000 on subscriptions. But the $12,000 is his projection not a revenue dashboard: the video has no client, no task log, no working automation at all. The real asset here is not the stack of hardware but the one repeatable process the agent actually closes. Because a Mac mini on its own earns nothing. The money shows up exactly where the boring browser routine used to be done by hand for a salary and now you can hand it to an agent for the price of a subscription. Computer use is still in beta, almost nobody builds a service on it and the demand for cheap GUI routine is huge. The window is open for literally the next few months. Most people will watch this, laugh at the "$600 AI worker" and close it. And the ones who actually put an agent on one boring task and grind it into a repeat will ride this wave while it is still empty. Would you sit an AI right at your own computer on the boring routine or are you still clicking through it by hand?
1:05

One guy keeps a farm of Mac minis on his desk and says each $600 box brings him $2,000 a month while he sleeps. AND THE HARDWARE ACTUALLY WORKS. But the number is not even the interesting part. The broken part is HOW: his AI no longer sits in a chat window. It sees the screen, moves the mouse itself, types and clicks the interface like a human at a computer. That is it. While most people still run AI in a chat and ask it for text, he sat Claude down right at the computer and put it to work with its hands. He automated not a single task but the workplace itself. How it actually works: on every Mac mini Claude runs with computer use turned on and the official Claude API docs spell it out: screenshot capture, mouse control, keyboard input, desktop automation. The agent opens the browser and the apps itself and runs the boring routine on a schedule: pulls leads, fills the CRM, checks orders, runs QA on the site. One box, one quiet worker that does not sleep and does not ask for a salary. His math is simple: a Mac mini is $600 once, Claude Max is $200 a month, and a live white-collar worker on the same routine costs a business $4,000 and up. So he rents out each node to a client as an AI worker for about $2,000 and 6 Mac minis come out to around $12,000 a month with costs a bit over $1,000 on subscriptions. But the $12,000 is his projection not a revenue dashboard: the video has no client, no task log, no working automation at all. The real asset here is not the stack of hardware but the one repeatable process the agent actually closes. Because a Mac mini on its own earns nothing. The money shows up exactly where the boring browser routine used to be done by hand for a salary and now you can hand it to an agent for the price of a subscription. Computer use is still in beta, almost nobody builds a service on it and the demand for cheap GUI routine is huge. The window is open for literally the next few months. Most people will watch this, laugh at the "$600 AI worker" and close it. And the ones who actually put an agent on one boring task and grind it into a repeat will ride this wave while it is still empty. Would you sit an AI right at your own computer on the boring routine or are you still clicking through it by hand?

Sorven

11,948 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

gpt-5.5 just dropped. and it changes EVERYTHING for traders. openai stopped calling it a chat model. they call it an "agent runtime" now. that means one thing: AI that doesn't wait for you - it acts. here's what gpt-5.5 can actually do: → runs multi-step trading workflows autonomously → operates computer interfaces without human input → plans, iterates, executes - in a terminal, not a chat window → 82.7% on Terminal-Bench 2.0 - real command-line task execution the only question is: are you already running one? full FREE Guide here → like + bookmark. this is the wave.
0:23

gpt-5.5 just dropped. and it changes EVERYTHING for traders. openai stopped calling it a chat model. they call it an "agent runtime" now. that means one thing: AI that doesn't wait for you - it acts. here's what gpt-5.5 can actually do: → runs multi-step trading workflows autonomously → operates computer interfaces without human input → plans, iterates, executes - in a terminal, not a chat window → 82.7% on Terminal-Bench 2.0 - real command-line task execution the only question is: are you already running one? full FREE Guide here → like + bookmark. this is the wave.

AlphaCartel

56,823 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

JUST IN: Perplexity launched "Perplexity Computer" — and it might be the most complete AI agent system available right now. Not a chatbot upgrade. Not a research tool with a new name. A system that plans entire projects, delegates to specialist AI models, and runs autonomously for hours, days, or months (their words). Here's what makes the architecture genuinely different: → Opus 4.6 handles core reasoning and orchestration → Gemini handles deep research (spawning its own sub-agents) → Grok handles lightweight speed tasks → Veo 3.1 handles video generation → Nano Banana handles image creation → ChatGPT 5.2 handles long-context recall and wide search → You can override model choices per subtask 19 models total. Each task runs in an isolated environment with a real filesystem, real browser, and real tool integrations. You describe an outcome. It breaks it into tasks and subtasks, creates sub-agents for each, and coordinates them automatically. When a sub-agent hits a problem, it spawns more sub-agents to solve it. And it connects to your existing stack — GitHub, Google Drive, Gmail, Slack, Jira, Linear, Notion, Confluence, Ahrefs, Airtable, and more. Critically, it doesn't just run once. It can run on a schedule. Reading your docs, checking your project boards, pulling from your CRM, and acting on what it finds. Market monitoring. Competitor tracking. Weekly reports with charts. Content pipelines. CRON jobs that actually execute. Not "AI that helps you once." AI that runs in the background for days or months. Think of it as managed OpenClaw — similar autonomous capability (scheduled tasks, multi-step workflows, tool integrations) but fully managed. No Mac Mini. No security config. No infrastructure to maintain. I tested it with a complex prompt — a full stock trading simulator with what-if scenarios, correlation heatmaps, sentiment analysis, and a Bloomberg Terminal aesthetic. Two prompts later: deployed to Netlify via GitHub, with working CRON jobs updating live data. I've started using it to analyze my portfolio. But coding is just one lane. This thing researches, writes reports, generates datasets, creates videos, processes documents, and connects to your existing tools — all in one coordinated workflow. The real shift: you don't choose a model anymore. You describe what you need. The system routes each piece of work to whichever model does it best — and spawns new agents when it hits a wall. 19 models, dynamic sub-agents, scheduled tasks, and your entire tool stack connected. Thoughts?
0:37

JUST IN: Perplexity launched "Perplexity Computer" — and it might be the most complete AI agent system available right now. Not a chatbot upgrade. Not a research tool with a new name. A system that plans entire projects, delegates to specialist AI models, and runs autonomously for hours, days, or months (their words). Here's what makes the architecture genuinely different: → Opus 4.6 handles core reasoning and orchestration → Gemini handles deep research (spawning its own sub-agents) → Grok handles lightweight speed tasks → Veo 3.1 handles video generation → Nano Banana handles image creation → ChatGPT 5.2 handles long-context recall and wide search → You can override model choices per subtask 19 models total. Each task runs in an isolated environment with a real filesystem, real browser, and real tool integrations. You describe an outcome. It breaks it into tasks and subtasks, creates sub-agents for each, and coordinates them automatically. When a sub-agent hits a problem, it spawns more sub-agents to solve it. And it connects to your existing stack — GitHub, Google Drive, Gmail, Slack, Jira, Linear, Notion, Confluence, Ahrefs, Airtable, and more. Critically, it doesn't just run once. It can run on a schedule. Reading your docs, checking your project boards, pulling from your CRM, and acting on what it finds. Market monitoring. Competitor tracking. Weekly reports with charts. Content pipelines. CRON jobs that actually execute. Not "AI that helps you once." AI that runs in the background for days or months. Think of it as managed OpenClaw — similar autonomous capability (scheduled tasks, multi-step workflows, tool integrations) but fully managed. No Mac Mini. No security config. No infrastructure to maintain. I tested it with a complex prompt — a full stock trading simulator with what-if scenarios, correlation heatmaps, sentiment analysis, and a Bloomberg Terminal aesthetic. Two prompts later: deployed to Netlify via GitHub, with working CRON jobs updating live data. I've started using it to analyze my portfolio. But coding is just one lane. This thing researches, writes reports, generates datasets, creates videos, processes documents, and connects to your existing tools — all in one coordinated workflow. The real shift: you don't choose a model anymore. You describe what you need. The system routes each piece of work to whichever model does it best — and spawns new agents when it hits a wall. 19 models, dynamic sub-agents, scheduled tasks, and your entire tool stack connected. Thoughts?

Paweł Huryn

219,498 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

15-year-old American made $14,000 in his first month selling a service most marketers have never even heard of. Every time someone searches for a business on Google - the first thing they see is an AI response, not a website and not an ad. ChatGPT gives 5-6 recommendations and if a business isn't there - the customer goes to a competitor without a single click. His secret - AI visibility. He optimized local businesses to appear in ChatGPT responses, Google AI Overview and Meta AI instead of paying for ads that no longer work. He'd walk up to a business owner, show them that their business didn't appear in AI responses and ask if they wanted to fix it. Almost everyone said yes immediately. 8 clients at $800 in the first month, 20 clients in the second - because every satisfied client referred him to someone else. This isn't a marketing problem - it's a visibility problem. And he was the only one solving it in his city.
0:45

15-year-old American made $14,000 in his first month selling a service most marketers have never even heard of. Every time someone searches for a business on Google - the first thing they see is an AI response, not a website and not an ad. ChatGPT gives 5-6 recommendations and if a business isn't there - the customer goes to a competitor without a single click. His secret - AI visibility. He optimized local businesses to appear in ChatGPT responses, Google AI Overview and Meta AI instead of paying for ads that no longer work. He'd walk up to a business owner, show them that their business didn't appear in AI responses and ask if they wanted to fix it. Almost everyone said yes immediately. 8 clients at $800 in the first month, 20 clients in the second - because every satisfied client referred him to someone else. This isn't a marketing problem - it's a visibility problem. And he was the only one solving it in his city.

Noisy

42,746 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Everyone says "get your team using AI." No one talks about the bill. I've been beating this drum at RapidDev for years. Our team using AI isn't optional anymore. It's the only way to stay competitive, full stop. But we have 220 people. It adds up fast. You want Claude? Fine. Then it’s Perplexity. Then ChatGPT. Giving everyone a seat on every model isn't realistic. So we started using Playgram. It has every model in one place. You can even switch mid-conversation without losing context. And you pay for usage. Not seats, not per model. I even pulled the analytics the other day. One of my guys sent 200 AI messages in a single week. That's exactly what I want to see! Playgram has not launched publicly yet, but if you’d like an early access, leave a comment below.
0:52

Everyone says "get your team using AI." No one talks about the bill. I've been beating this drum at RapidDev for years. Our team using AI isn't optional anymore. It's the only way to stay competitive, full stop. But we have 220 people. It adds up fast. You want Claude? Fine. Then it’s Perplexity. Then ChatGPT. Giving everyone a seat on every model isn't realistic. So we started using Playgram. It has every model in one place. You can even switch mid-conversation without losing context. And you pay for usage. Not seats, not per model. I even pulled the analytics the other day. One of my guys sent 200 AI messages in a single week. That's exactly what I want to see! Playgram has not launched publicly yet, but if you’d like an early access, leave a comment below.

Matt Graham

458,643 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Perplexity declared war on the biggest open source AI movement of 2026. This changes how millions of people will interact with AI agents forever. Here is what happened and why almost nobody is talking about the real implications. OpenClaw exploded in January and it became one of the fastest growing open source projects in GitHub history.​ The premise was radical. An AI agent that runs on your own machine, connects to your messaging apps and actually does things while you sleep.​ Developers went wild and over 700 community built skills appeared on ClawHub. People were negotiating car deals, filing legal rebuttals, and building entire social networks run by AI agents.​ Then Perplexity showed up with something different. A cloud powered system that coordinates 20 frontier AI models at once.​ They call it Perplexity Computer and this week they went even further.​ They announced Personal Computer. An always on AI agent that lives on a Mac mini in your home, connected to your local files and Perplexity's secure servers around the clock.​ It never sleeps or stops working and you control it from any device, anywhere.​ But the real story is what CEO Aravind Srinivas said during the Q&A session at their inaugural developer conference in San Francisco.​ He called Perplexity Computer a product "meant for serious people."​ He talked about Uber drivers asking him when they could stop driving and let AI make them passive income. That, he said, is the actual vision and then he went directly after OpenClaw. He said even a former Perplexity engineer struggled to get OpenClaw running on their own machine.​ He warned about unvetted malware being imported through OpenClaw's community skill hub, with no control over what people are contributing.​ He called the hobbyist approach of managing 700 API keys and sub agent configuration files a dead end for mainstream adoption.​ And four years of building world class orchestration gives Perplexity something an open source project cannot match. Enterprise grade security for solopreneurs and businesses alike.​ On one side, OpenClaw represents radical openness. Your data stays local, you choose your own models, you own everything and the community builds the tools. On the other hand, Perplexity is betting that most people don’t want to be system administrators. They want results, security guarantees, and something that just works out of the box. The Personal Computer runs on Perplexity's SOC 2 certified infrastructure. Every sensitive action requires user approval, every action is logged, and there is a kill switch. The enterprise version connects natively to Snowflake, Salesforce, HubSpot, and hundreds of other platforms. Teams can query data warehouses and build financial models without waiting on an analytics team.​ The real question is not which product is technically better. The real question is whether the future of AI agents looks like Linux or looks like the iPhone. Because the Uber driver Srinivas described is not going to configure sub agent routing tables. That person needs something that works the moment they open it. And if Perplexity captures that market, the open source movement becomes a niche for developers instead of a revolution for everyone. That is the billion dollar bet being made right now.
2:02

Perplexity declared war on the biggest open source AI movement of 2026. This changes how millions of people will interact with AI agents forever. Here is what happened and why almost nobody is talking about the real implications. OpenClaw exploded in January and it became one of the fastest growing open source projects in GitHub history.​ The premise was radical. An AI agent that runs on your own machine, connects to your messaging apps and actually does things while you sleep.​ Developers went wild and over 700 community built skills appeared on ClawHub. People were negotiating car deals, filing legal rebuttals, and building entire social networks run by AI agents.​ Then Perplexity showed up with something different. A cloud powered system that coordinates 20 frontier AI models at once.​ They call it Perplexity Computer and this week they went even further.​ They announced Personal Computer. An always on AI agent that lives on a Mac mini in your home, connected to your local files and Perplexity's secure servers around the clock.​ It never sleeps or stops working and you control it from any device, anywhere.​ But the real story is what CEO Aravind Srinivas said during the Q&A session at their inaugural developer conference in San Francisco.​ He called Perplexity Computer a product "meant for serious people."​ He talked about Uber drivers asking him when they could stop driving and let AI make them passive income. That, he said, is the actual vision and then he went directly after OpenClaw. He said even a former Perplexity engineer struggled to get OpenClaw running on their own machine.​ He warned about unvetted malware being imported through OpenClaw's community skill hub, with no control over what people are contributing.​ He called the hobbyist approach of managing 700 API keys and sub agent configuration files a dead end for mainstream adoption.​ And four years of building world class orchestration gives Perplexity something an open source project cannot match. Enterprise grade security for solopreneurs and businesses alike.​ On one side, OpenClaw represents radical openness. Your data stays local, you choose your own models, you own everything and the community builds the tools. On the other hand, Perplexity is betting that most people don’t want to be system administrators. They want results, security guarantees, and something that just works out of the box. The Personal Computer runs on Perplexity's SOC 2 certified infrastructure. Every sensitive action requires user approval, every action is logged, and there is a kill switch. The enterprise version connects natively to Snowflake, Salesforce, HubSpot, and hundreds of other platforms. Teams can query data warehouses and build financial models without waiting on an analytics team.​ The real question is not which product is technically better. The real question is whether the future of AI agents looks like Linux or looks like the iPhone. Because the Uber driver Srinivas described is not going to configure sub agent routing tables. That person needs something that works the moment they open it. And if Perplexity captures that market, the open source movement becomes a niche for developers instead of a revolution for everyone. That is the billion dollar bet being made right now.

Milk Road AI

22,256 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Today Perplexity shipped everything Siri was supposed to be 💻 Personal computer now has access to: → iMessage → Every folder on your Mac → 400+ connected apps → Apple Mail, Calendars, Browsers etc... Underneath, Claude Opus 4.7 is the brain. It breaks your goal into subtasks and routes each one to whichever of 20 models wins at it. GPT for long context. Gemini for deep research. Grok for speed. Nano Banana for images. Veo for video. Codex for code. It runs 24/7. You can trigger it from your phone. Pretty sweet design too
1:34

Today Perplexity shipped everything Siri was supposed to be 💻 Personal computer now has access to: → iMessage → Every folder on your Mac → 400+ connected apps → Apple Mail, Calendars, Browsers etc... Underneath, Claude Opus 4.7 is the brain. It breaks your goal into subtasks and routes each one to whichever of 20 models wins at it. GPT for long context. Gemini for deep research. Grok for speed. Nano Banana for images. Veo for video. Codex for code. It runs 24/7. You can trigger it from your phone. Pretty sweet design too

Josh Kale

665,111 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Microsoft just betrayed OpenAI and Anthropic, the two companies it helped build. And it could break the entire AI trade... Here's what happened: Inside Excel and Outlook, two of the most used business apps on Earth, Microsoft has started routing tens of thousands of AI requests every week to its own in-house models instead of OpenAI and Anthropic. Microsoft's own AI chief, Mustafa Suleyman, said himself: "We pay a lot of money to Anthropic, so our goal is to reduce and ultimately ELIMINATE that cost." This is the company that poured $13 billion into OpenAI and effectively created the modern AI industry, and it just decided the most advanced models on the market are NOT worth paying for. And here's the thing... Microsoft is not just ripping out OpenAI everywhere - it is being surgical about it. The hardest and rarest tasks can still go to OpenAI or Anthropic. What Microsoft is taking back is the boring, high-volume work, like the email replies, the thread summaries, and the simple spreadsheet formulas. Why does that matter so much? Because that boring, repetitive work is where the actual money lives. The frontier labs assumed businesses would push BILLIONS of these tiny requests through expensive models forever. That endless river of tokens is the entire reason OpenAI and Anthropic are valued in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Microsoft looked at that river, decided it was massively overpaying, and rerouted it to models it owns outright. So the single biggest customer in the industry just walked off with the most profitable part of the business. And it is not only Microsoft: That same week, CNBC reported that American companies have been escaping to Chinese AI models to dodge rising US prices. Chinese models now handle more than 30% of US companies' AI usage on one major platform, peaking at 46%, up from an average of 11% a year earlier. They cost 60 to 90% less, and on some benchmarks they land within a single point of the best American model. One US startup moved ALL of its AI traffic off Claude and onto China's DeepSeek, and expects to save millions. Meanwhile Meta just admitted it has "excess" AI compute it wants to sell, becoming the first giant to concede it built far too much. Do you see the pattern forming? For two years, the entire AI story rested on one assumption: Every company on Earth would happily pay premium prices for the best model, forever. That assumption literally died in a single week. And the market noticed. More than a trillion dollars has been wiped off AI and chip stocks in a matter of days, as Wall Street finally started asking whether all of this spending will ever pay for itself. What this means for OpenAI and Anthropic: Their models are extraordinary, and it may not matter because their own biggest customers have decided they do not NEED the best model in the world to answer an email, and "good enough" now costs a fraction of the price. When even Microsoft refuses to pay full price for AI, the real question becomes who exactly IS left to pay it. What do you think?
1:05

Microsoft just betrayed OpenAI and Anthropic, the two companies it helped build. And it could break the entire AI trade... Here's what happened: Inside Excel and Outlook, two of the most used business apps on Earth, Microsoft has started routing tens of thousands of AI requests every week to its own in-house models instead of OpenAI and Anthropic. Microsoft's own AI chief, Mustafa Suleyman, said himself: "We pay a lot of money to Anthropic, so our goal is to reduce and ultimately ELIMINATE that cost." This is the company that poured $13 billion into OpenAI and effectively created the modern AI industry, and it just decided the most advanced models on the market are NOT worth paying for. And here's the thing... Microsoft is not just ripping out OpenAI everywhere - it is being surgical about it. The hardest and rarest tasks can still go to OpenAI or Anthropic. What Microsoft is taking back is the boring, high-volume work, like the email replies, the thread summaries, and the simple spreadsheet formulas. Why does that matter so much? Because that boring, repetitive work is where the actual money lives. The frontier labs assumed businesses would push BILLIONS of these tiny requests through expensive models forever. That endless river of tokens is the entire reason OpenAI and Anthropic are valued in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Microsoft looked at that river, decided it was massively overpaying, and rerouted it to models it owns outright. So the single biggest customer in the industry just walked off with the most profitable part of the business. And it is not only Microsoft: That same week, CNBC reported that American companies have been escaping to Chinese AI models to dodge rising US prices. Chinese models now handle more than 30% of US companies' AI usage on one major platform, peaking at 46%, up from an average of 11% a year earlier. They cost 60 to 90% less, and on some benchmarks they land within a single point of the best American model. One US startup moved ALL of its AI traffic off Claude and onto China's DeepSeek, and expects to save millions. Meanwhile Meta just admitted it has "excess" AI compute it wants to sell, becoming the first giant to concede it built far too much. Do you see the pattern forming? For two years, the entire AI story rested on one assumption: Every company on Earth would happily pay premium prices for the best model, forever. That assumption literally died in a single week. And the market noticed. More than a trillion dollars has been wiped off AI and chip stocks in a matter of days, as Wall Street finally started asking whether all of this spending will ever pay for itself. What this means for OpenAI and Anthropic: Their models are extraordinary, and it may not matter because their own biggest customers have decided they do not NEED the best model in the world to answer an email, and "good enough" now costs a fraction of the price. When even Microsoft refuses to pay full price for AI, the real question becomes who exactly IS left to pay it. What do you think?

Ricardo

92,526 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

SOMEONE JUST DROPPED A FREE AI PLUGIN THAT LIVES INSIDE BLENDER it's called Blender Buddy and it's basically your personal AI helper for 3D work. what it does: > ask it anything about Blender and it answers > tell it to do something and it actually does it inside your scene > it can SEE your viewport, so it knows what you're working on > it can search the web when it needs to look something up > runs locally on your computer (no accounts, no logins, no monthly fees) why this matters: > every other AI Blender addon costs money or needs an API key > this one is completely free AND works offline > 400+ people downloaded it in the first 11 hours if you use Blender, just go grab it. it's free. link in replies 👇
1:59

SOMEONE JUST DROPPED A FREE AI PLUGIN THAT LIVES INSIDE BLENDER it's called Blender Buddy and it's basically your personal AI helper for 3D work. what it does: > ask it anything about Blender and it answers > tell it to do something and it actually does it inside your scene > it can SEE your viewport, so it knows what you're working on > it can search the web when it needs to look something up > runs locally on your computer (no accounts, no logins, no monthly fees) why this matters: > every other AI Blender addon costs money or needs an API key > this one is completely free AND works offline > 400+ people downloaded it in the first 11 hours if you use Blender, just go grab it. it's free. link in replies 👇

Creators Toolbox

358,825 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

clickup just mass-obsoleted every AI agent platform here's the thing nobody's talking about: AI doesn't fail because the models are bad. it fails because it has no context. you paste in a prompt. it hallucinates. you blame the tool. but the tool was never the problem. the CONTEXT was. clickup just solved this. their new "super agents" live INSIDE your workspace. they see everything: - your tasks - your docs - your meetings - your conversations - your decisions 100% context. always on. always scraping. this isn't bolted-on AI calling APIs. this is AI that already knows your business. i've been running an AI backend for my agency. the architecture works - but you have to BUILD the context layer. clickup just made that automatic. i already use it. have tons of data there. this is about to be unbelievable. if you're building automations and you're not paying attention to this— you're about to get lapped. playing with it hard over the next 2 days. full deep dive coming. drop "SUPER" and i'll send you the breakdown when it's ready.
5:50

clickup just mass-obsoleted every AI agent platform here's the thing nobody's talking about: AI doesn't fail because the models are bad. it fails because it has no context. you paste in a prompt. it hallucinates. you blame the tool. but the tool was never the problem. the CONTEXT was. clickup just solved this. their new "super agents" live INSIDE your workspace. they see everything: - your tasks - your docs - your meetings - your conversations - your decisions 100% context. always on. always scraping. this isn't bolted-on AI calling APIs. this is AI that already knows your business. i've been running an AI backend for my agency. the architecture works - but you have to BUILD the context layer. clickup just made that automatic. i already use it. have tons of data there. this is about to be unbelievable. if you're building automations and you're not paying attention to this— you're about to get lapped. playing with it hard over the next 2 days. full deep dive coming. drop "SUPER" and i'll send you the breakdown when it's ready.

Nozz

20,271 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

something I’ve wanted for a while: an AI that isn’t just a text box so I built it lets you create a 3D AI character on-chain that lives in your browser it can talk, remember you, show emotions, and use different skills. you can even mint it onchain, so it actually belongs to you it gets its own identity, history, and reputation that no one can take away most AI today can disappear if the app shuts down this one is permanent and yours the future is AI you can see, interact with, and actually own
1:23

something I’ve wanted for a while: an AI that isn’t just a text box so I built it lets you create a 3D AI character on-chain that lives in your browser it can talk, remember you, show emotions, and use different skills. you can even mint it onchain, so it actually belongs to you it gets its own identity, history, and reputation that no one can take away most AI today can disappear if the app shuts down this one is permanent and yours the future is AI you can see, interact with, and actually own

nich

256,465 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Imagine an AI application that can type anywhere you can and use the full context of what's on your screen. ​ This is the application we all deserve (at least if you have macOS.) ​ Check out Omnipilot. It's an app that works with every other macOS application and uses Claude Sonet 3.5 in the background—it also supports Gemini and GPT-4o. ​ ​ Here is the idea: ​ You can use the tool to ask questions about anything on your screen. Or you can use it to autocomplete the text you are typing. You don't need to copy and paste anymore or waste your time providing context to a model. ​ It sees what you see. It works right where you are. ​ That's pretty cool. ​ Here are a couple of cool examples: ​ • Use it to reply to an email • Use it in the terminal to autocomplete a command • Use it to finish a document • Use to send a message on Slack ​ AI at the system level is bonkers. You can read a ton more on their Product Hunt launch page: ​ ​ Thanks to the Omnipilot team for collaborating with me on this post!
0:29

Imagine an AI application that can type anywhere you can and use the full context of what's on your screen. ​ This is the application we all deserve (at least if you have macOS.) ​ Check out Omnipilot. It's an app that works with every other macOS application and uses Claude Sonet 3.5 in the background—it also supports Gemini and GPT-4o. ​ ​ Here is the idea: ​ You can use the tool to ask questions about anything on your screen. Or you can use it to autocomplete the text you are typing. You don't need to copy and paste anymore or waste your time providing context to a model. ​ It sees what you see. It works right where you are. ​ That's pretty cool. ​ Here are a couple of cool examples: ​ • Use it to reply to an email • Use it in the terminal to autocomplete a command • Use it to finish a document • Use to send a message on Slack ​ AI at the system level is bonkers. You can read a ton more on their Product Hunt launch page: ​ ​ Thanks to the Omnipilot team for collaborating with me on this post!

Santiago

72,306 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

An entire empire was overthrown over a two percent tax on a breakfast beverage. Look at what you tolerate now. You are taxed when you earn it. Taxed when you spend it. Taxed when you save it. Taxed when you invest it. And when you die, they tax whatever is left. That is not a system. That is a harvest. You commute in a car you paid sales tax to buy. You drive it on roads you were already taxed to build. You fill it with gas taxed by the gallon. When you sell that car, the next buyer pays sales tax on it again. The same car. Taxed every time it changes hands. You arrive at a job where your salary is cut before it ever touches your hands. If you work for yourself, you pay both sides. Two people on paper. Neither one keeps what they earned. Then you go home. Every bill you open has a government standing behind it with its hand out. You buy a house with money they already took their share of. Then they charge you property tax on it every year for the rest of your life. You want to renovate your own kitchen. You need a permit. You want to build a deck on your own land. You need a permit. You pay for the property. Then you pay for permission to use it. Stop paying property tax and they seize your home. Not because you missed a mortgage payment. Because you missed a payment to the government for the privilege of keeping what is already yours. You do not own your home. You rent it from the state. If you leave something behind for your children, they are taxed on what you were already taxed to earn. The same wealth. Taxed at every stage of your life. Then taxed one final time because you had the audacity to die. They found a way to monetize your absence. We are told this is the price of civilization. It is not. It is architecture. The most effective prison ever built is the one where the inmates believe they are free. They did not take your freedom. They priced you out of it. If you kept the full value of your labor, you would be free within years. Not decades. Years. The system cannot allow that. A machine built on consumption needs a consumer that never stops. You did not sign a social contract. You were assigned one. Now pay attention. They spent decades perfecting the extraction of your productivity. Now they are building the technology to replace you. AI is not coming for your job because corporations are greedy. It is coming because a system that already takes half your output just realized it can take all of it. Without needing you in the equation. You were never the point of this arrangement. You were the input. And the moment they engineer a cheaper one, you become a rounding error on a quarterly earnings call. They did not build AI to free you. They built it to finish what the tax code started. It was never about the tea. It was about the precedent. Today we hand over half our waking lives and thank them for the potholes. You do not live in a free economy. You live in a subscription you never signed up for. And the penalty for canceling is everything you have.
0:57

An entire empire was overthrown over a two percent tax on a breakfast beverage. Look at what you tolerate now. You are taxed when you earn it. Taxed when you spend it. Taxed when you save it. Taxed when you invest it. And when you die, they tax whatever is left. That is not a system. That is a harvest. You commute in a car you paid sales tax to buy. You drive it on roads you were already taxed to build. You fill it with gas taxed by the gallon. When you sell that car, the next buyer pays sales tax on it again. The same car. Taxed every time it changes hands. You arrive at a job where your salary is cut before it ever touches your hands. If you work for yourself, you pay both sides. Two people on paper. Neither one keeps what they earned. Then you go home. Every bill you open has a government standing behind it with its hand out. You buy a house with money they already took their share of. Then they charge you property tax on it every year for the rest of your life. You want to renovate your own kitchen. You need a permit. You want to build a deck on your own land. You need a permit. You pay for the property. Then you pay for permission to use it. Stop paying property tax and they seize your home. Not because you missed a mortgage payment. Because you missed a payment to the government for the privilege of keeping what is already yours. You do not own your home. You rent it from the state. If you leave something behind for your children, they are taxed on what you were already taxed to earn. The same wealth. Taxed at every stage of your life. Then taxed one final time because you had the audacity to die. They found a way to monetize your absence. We are told this is the price of civilization. It is not. It is architecture. The most effective prison ever built is the one where the inmates believe they are free. They did not take your freedom. They priced you out of it. If you kept the full value of your labor, you would be free within years. Not decades. Years. The system cannot allow that. A machine built on consumption needs a consumer that never stops. You did not sign a social contract. You were assigned one. Now pay attention. They spent decades perfecting the extraction of your productivity. Now they are building the technology to replace you. AI is not coming for your job because corporations are greedy. It is coming because a system that already takes half your output just realized it can take all of it. Without needing you in the equation. You were never the point of this arrangement. You were the input. And the moment they engineer a cheaper one, you become a rounding error on a quarterly earnings call. They did not build AI to free you. They built it to finish what the tax code started. It was never about the tea. It was about the precedent. Today we hand over half our waking lives and thank them for the potholes. You do not live in a free economy. You live in a subscription you never signed up for. And the penalty for canceling is everything you have.

Dustin

27,737 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

This guy literally told Claude to run every day at 4am. Now it opens his website, writes a blog post, and optimizes it for SEO. Every single day. Zero involvement. Here's how Claude computer use actually works: It looks at your screen. Moves your mouse. Clicks buttons. Opens apps. Completes the full task on its own. No code. No workflow builder. No setup. You just tell it what you want done. And the 4am SEO trick? You schedule it once inside Claude Co-work. Claude runs it every night while you sleep. Your site gets fresh content. You wake up and check the results. That's not a chatbot. That's an AI employee.
11:12

This guy literally told Claude to run every day at 4am. Now it opens his website, writes a blog post, and optimizes it for SEO. Every single day. Zero involvement. Here's how Claude computer use actually works: It looks at your screen. Moves your mouse. Clicks buttons. Opens apps. Completes the full task on its own. No code. No workflow builder. No setup. You just tell it what you want done. And the 4am SEO trick? You schedule it once inside Claude Co-work. Claude runs it every night while you sleep. Your site gets fresh content. You wake up and check the results. That's not a chatbot. That's an AI employee.

Julian Goldie SEO

133,228 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

TWO EX-OPENAI ENGINEERS BUILT A WEBSITE THAT TELLS YOU HOW FAMOUS YOU ARE TO THE AI. no signup. no login. you type your name and 13 different models cough up everything they remember about you. it is called Are You in the Weights. the second you load the page you get the joke. there is a leaderboard. Messi sits at the top with a score of 996. Charlize Theron at 988. Bette Midler at 986. then there is you, scoring 12, sharing a tier with a 19th century coal miner from Sheffield. the screenshot is the post. you don't have to explain it. > it asks GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, Grok 4.20, Gemini 3.1, DeepSeek, Kimi, Llama, Mistral, Qwen, and four more > every model gets a colored bar showing how confidently it knows you > common names break it in the funniest way. type "Karen Mitchell" and the AI stacks two cards on top of each other, one British food author, one American soap actress, neither sure which one you meant > truly obscure names just spin forever while the model tries to decide if you exist > every result has a COPY IMAGE button built in. they want you to share it. made by Thomas Dimson and Joey Flynn, the two founders of Global Illumination. OpenAI bought their company in 2023. the first acquisition OpenAI ever made. they left this year and the very first thing they shipped is a vanity search engine. Dimson's pitch is darker than it sounds. "being in the weights means your existence was deemed important in the process of creating superhuman artificial intelligence. it's a kind of fame meaning you live on as long as the model does." so go check if you live forever. it takes nine seconds.
0:26

TWO EX-OPENAI ENGINEERS BUILT A WEBSITE THAT TELLS YOU HOW FAMOUS YOU ARE TO THE AI. no signup. no login. you type your name and 13 different models cough up everything they remember about you. it is called Are You in the Weights. the second you load the page you get the joke. there is a leaderboard. Messi sits at the top with a score of 996. Charlize Theron at 988. Bette Midler at 986. then there is you, scoring 12, sharing a tier with a 19th century coal miner from Sheffield. the screenshot is the post. you don't have to explain it. > it asks GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, Grok 4.20, Gemini 3.1, DeepSeek, Kimi, Llama, Mistral, Qwen, and four more > every model gets a colored bar showing how confidently it knows you > common names break it in the funniest way. type "Karen Mitchell" and the AI stacks two cards on top of each other, one British food author, one American soap actress, neither sure which one you meant > truly obscure names just spin forever while the model tries to decide if you exist > every result has a COPY IMAGE button built in. they want you to share it. made by Thomas Dimson and Joey Flynn, the two founders of Global Illumination. OpenAI bought their company in 2023. the first acquisition OpenAI ever made. they left this year and the very first thing they shipped is a vanity search engine. Dimson's pitch is darker than it sounds. "being in the weights means your existence was deemed important in the process of creating superhuman artificial intelligence. it's a kind of fame meaning you live on as long as the model does." so go check if you live forever. it takes nine seconds.

Nav Toor

27,775 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Mark Zuckerberg just described the minimum viable business for the next decade. A fourth item made the checklist. Zuckerberg: “Every business, just like they have a website, and a phone number, and an email address, is also going to have an AI.” Website. Phone number. Email address. AI agent. That is not a prediction. That is a new baseline. Twenty years ago, not having a website was a choice. Then it stopped being one. Nobody scheduled that transition. The same filter is back. Running faster this time. A business without an AI agent handling sales, support, and customer interaction will not look outdated. It will look abandoned. Its competitor’s agent responds in two seconds. Knows every customer by name. And while it’s handling yours, it’s handling ten thousand others. You do not outwork that. You do not outspend it. You just lose to it. But Zuckerberg went somewhere most tech CEOs refuse to go. He picked a side in the debate most CEOs avoid entirely. Zuckerberg: “Do you want a future where you’re interacting with kind of one system for everything? Or do you want one where a lot of different people are building a lot of different AIs?” One AI controlled by one company. Or millions of AIs built by millions of people. Centralized intelligence. Or distributed intelligence. Zuckerberg chose distributed. Zuckerberg: “What open source does is it makes it so everyone can take and modify the model and build stuff on top of it. Which is different from the kind of closed and centralized approach.” The closed model makes every business a tenant. You rent intelligence on someone else’s terms. At someone else’s price. Inside someone else’s guardrails. The open model makes every business an owner. You modify the model. You deploy it your way. You build equity in your own system with every iteration. That gap widens quietly. Then it becomes permanent. The tenant pays more for less control every year. The owner pulls further ahead every cycle. One is a subscription. The other is infrastructure. Then Zuckerberg described the part most people have not thought about yet. Zuckerberg: “A lot of creators will have their own AIs. It’s like a richer world when there’s a diversity of different things.” Your favorite creator will have an AI trained on everything they have ever made. Available to millions of people simultaneously. Responding in real time while the creator sleeps. That is the difference between a brand that scales with your waking hours and one that scales with compute. One has a ceiling. The other does not. Zuckerberg is not betting on one model that governs everything. He is betting on billions of specialized AIs, each built by the person closest to the problem it solves. The companies still debating whether to adopt AI are not having the wrong conversation. They are standing in a room where the meeting ended an hour ago. The checklist updated. They did not.
0:58

Mark Zuckerberg just described the minimum viable business for the next decade. A fourth item made the checklist. Zuckerberg: “Every business, just like they have a website, and a phone number, and an email address, is also going to have an AI.” Website. Phone number. Email address. AI agent. That is not a prediction. That is a new baseline. Twenty years ago, not having a website was a choice. Then it stopped being one. Nobody scheduled that transition. The same filter is back. Running faster this time. A business without an AI agent handling sales, support, and customer interaction will not look outdated. It will look abandoned. Its competitor’s agent responds in two seconds. Knows every customer by name. And while it’s handling yours, it’s handling ten thousand others. You do not outwork that. You do not outspend it. You just lose to it. But Zuckerberg went somewhere most tech CEOs refuse to go. He picked a side in the debate most CEOs avoid entirely. Zuckerberg: “Do you want a future where you’re interacting with kind of one system for everything? Or do you want one where a lot of different people are building a lot of different AIs?” One AI controlled by one company. Or millions of AIs built by millions of people. Centralized intelligence. Or distributed intelligence. Zuckerberg chose distributed. Zuckerberg: “What open source does is it makes it so everyone can take and modify the model and build stuff on top of it. Which is different from the kind of closed and centralized approach.” The closed model makes every business a tenant. You rent intelligence on someone else’s terms. At someone else’s price. Inside someone else’s guardrails. The open model makes every business an owner. You modify the model. You deploy it your way. You build equity in your own system with every iteration. That gap widens quietly. Then it becomes permanent. The tenant pays more for less control every year. The owner pulls further ahead every cycle. One is a subscription. The other is infrastructure. Then Zuckerberg described the part most people have not thought about yet. Zuckerberg: “A lot of creators will have their own AIs. It’s like a richer world when there’s a diversity of different things.” Your favorite creator will have an AI trained on everything they have ever made. Available to millions of people simultaneously. Responding in real time while the creator sleeps. That is the difference between a brand that scales with your waking hours and one that scales with compute. One has a ceiling. The other does not. Zuckerberg is not betting on one model that governs everything. He is betting on billions of specialized AIs, each built by the person closest to the problem it solves. The companies still debating whether to adopt AI are not having the wrong conversation. They are standing in a room where the meeting ended an hour ago. The checklist updated. They did not.

Dustin

506,657 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten