Professional Computer Programmer Testifies Under Oath That He Coded Computers To Rig Elections In 2006 Our Elections Are So 100% Safe & Secure We Have Sworn Testimony Congressman Have PAID To Have Programs Written To Rig Elections Q&A “What is your profession? I'm a computer programmer. Would you please... speak into the microphone so the audience can hear your testimony? I'm a computer programmer. Mr. Curtis, are there programs that can be used to secretly fix elections? Yes. How do you know that would be the case? Because in October of 2000, I wrote a prototype for President Congressman Tom Feeney at the company I worked for in Ovigo, Florida that did just that. And when you say did just that, it would rig an election? It would flip the vote 51-49 to whoever you wanted it to go to and whichever race you wanted to win. Be something that elections officials that might be on county boards of elections could detect? They'd never see it. Mr. Would you answer that question once again? They would never see it. So how would such a such a program a secret program that fixes the election how could it be detected? You would have to view it either in the source code or you'd have to have a receipt and then count the hard paper against the actual vote total. Other than that, you won't see it.” — This is a very long testimony and worth listening to the entire thing. I’m unable to provide a full transcription due to X’s text limitsshow more

@laralogan The idea that we have had secure elections since the implementation of electronic voting is incredibly naive. If there is not 100% transparency and accountability in any government function it is and has been corrupt beyond a shadow of a doubt.

How much more evidence is required….

Paper ballots Voter I.D.

Question everything! let me say that again slowly. Question everything!!

It's amazing that so many people have come forward to explain how the world really works. How are most of us learning this just seeing it now? It's mind blowing.

Place voting on a BLOCKCHAIN!!! Problem solved! They won’t do it because they can’t cheat and manipulate! This goes for BOTH sides!

My answer to this is to run a citizen exit poll at my polling location. It’s up to us to double check. Anyone can do this.

The problem is that: Local election officials don't have the time, the resources, or the patience to verify the suspect, electronic, election results against every single ballot submitted. And the officials are encouraged to certify the elections results as soon as possible. But once the certification of the election results is officially authenticated and signed by the Election commissioner, the election ballots are often destroyed with days or weeks. Therefore there is no way to recheck the printed ballots against electronic results. There is your Election Tampering and Cover-up.

How people responsible still not indicted for that?

Clint's concept was never put in a voting system. It was conceptual. He never saw code of any voting system nor did he have access. The important part of his testimony was Tom Feeney allegation. The person who actually put code in real machines widely used in elections was Jeffrey Dean, a former embezzler who formerly worked for a politically connected law firm, one of the partners being Egil Krogh, head of the White House Plumbers unit during Watergate. Guess I'll write a piece on this, with receipts.